SUPPLIER AUDIT FORM

Supplier: Crystal Precision products - Bangalore (CPP) Date: 10/12/2009

Components supplied:
SEAL Washer, Eccentric boss, Clamp plate, Pick Line tube assy
Supplier Representatives Auditor:
Sl No Name Sign. Sl No Name Sign.
1 karthik 1 S.Jothibasu
2 Sunder 2
3 kumar ( QA ) 3
4 4
Results:
Individual Area Score Quality System Score:
A Incoming : 6.00
B Manufacturing : 22.92 Very good (90% & above)
C Audit /Final Inspection : 7.93

D Gauge calibration : 10.50 Good ( 75 to 89%)

E Material despatch : 7.50

F Special Activities : 11.33 a Needs Improvement (50 - 74%)

Overall Score: 52.94 % Poor ( Less than 50%)

(A+B+C+D+E+F)/125*100

Target date for next

audit:

Evaluation Criteria:
Supplier not familiar with the requirements of the element and has no relevant source documentation (flow charts,
0
forecast, plans, procedures, strategies.etc.) in this area
Supplier is familiar with the requirements of the element but there is no evidence of source documentation, planning
1
or implementation.
Supplier is familiar with requirements of the element and has preliminary source documentation with incomplete
2
plans for implementation.
Source documentation is available. Implementation (with assigned responsibilities) has just started, (0-30%
3
complete)
Source documentation is available and implementation is in progress (30- 60% complete). Deficiencies has been
4
identified but improvements are not quantifiable

Implementation has progressed (60-80% complete) and there is preliminary evidence of relevant results. 5

Implementation is nearly complete(85-95%) and documented evidence of implementation effectiveness exists 6

Full implementation of source documentation for the requirement and complete confirmed evidence of
7
implementation effectiveness. The supplier has met minimum requirements.
Analysis of results and on-going continuous improvements can be demonstrated in key areas linked to customer
8
satisfaction

Supplier has reached world class performance and is able to show growth and continuous improvement in all areas 9

Supplier is best in class---he creates industry bench mark 10

CTP/IND/S001 Rev 0; Page 1 of 3

Sl
Audit Points Observations Marks
No
A Incoming Area (weightage: 15)
Supplier Inspection reports / Raw material Raw material test report evidenced for Seal Washer & Eccentric boss products
1 (Reference for CPP/RECC/QA/ Register Report & Documents ) 8
TC

Incoming inspection system working , need to be improved Raw material

2 Inspection of incoming material Specification & Drawing
5

3 Material Identification System to be improved right now identification system not working at CPP 2

4 Material Storage & release (FIFO etc) System to be improved need sub rate Area for Storage 3

5 Shelf life material management Not applicable --

6 Supplier survey and selection system System to be improved need sub rate Area for Storage 2

Total score: 20
Points [(Total score/maximum score)*15]: 6
B Manufacturing (weightage: 50)

Work instructions evidenced for process machine at CPP . Need to be update

1 Availability & use of Operator instructions process Specification input and out put in work instruction 5

Identification & control of special

2 Identification & special Characteristics updated in Process instruction 6
characteristics

3 Job set up approval System to be improved 2

4 Visual control (Limit samples) System to be improved 2

5 Availability & use of gauges/instruments Gauges/Instruments were used to verify the dimensions as per Control plan 8

6 Periodic inspection Periodic inspection System to be improved all process 3

7 Verification of mistake proofing some of future available in mistake proofing & need to be improvements 6

8 Material identification Material identification System to be improved 2

9 Nonconforming material control System to be improved 3

10 Operator Training System to be improved 3

11 Tool life monitoring & Tool change over Tool life monitoring system is partially evidenced. ( tool history card not Available) 6

12 Preventive maintenance Preventive maintenance system exists 9

Total score: 55
Points [(Total score/maximum score)*50]: 22.92
C Audit /Final Inspection (weightage: 15)

1 Latest drawing Drawing available . ( CPP Stage wise Drawing available ) 8

2 Quality Requirements Quality requirements were understood by the Final Inspection Inspectors. 8

Final Inspection carried out by using the gauges/Instruments as identified in Control

3 Instrument / gauge availability plan/ Stage wise drawing. 8

4 Inspection instructions System to be improved 2

5 Check sheet need to be improve all area check Sheet 7

6 Control of non-conforming product System to be improved 2

CTP/IND/S001 Rev 0; Page 2 of 3

 7 Corrective and Preventive Action System to be improved 2

Total score: 37
Points [(Total score/maximum score)*15]: 7.93
D Gauge Calibration (weightage: 15)

1 Calibration system & Control Calibration control exists verified ( Ref attached Doc ) 8

2 Calibration Records caliobration record evidenced for Micrometer 0-25mm. ( Ref attached Doc ) 8

3 Calibration Instructions System to be improved or guide line to be improved 5

Total score: 21
Points [(Total score/maximum score)*15]: 10.5
E Material Despatch (weightage: 10)

Pre-dispatch inspection exists verified and they sent every batch ISIR & Raw
1 Pre-despatch Inspection material Report 8

2 FIFO Exists but needs improvement 6

3 Packaging packing found ok 8

4 Material identification (Labeling/Batch/Lot) Labelling (Tag) provided for every bins 8

Total score: 30
Points [(Total score/maximum score)*10]: 7.5
F Special activities (weightage: 20)

1 Customer complaint handling Customer complaint handling system needs to be improved 6

2 Returned material control and analysis Root cause analysis needs to be improved. 5

3 Material handling Materials handled need to be improved CPP sub supplier 5

4 Statistical techniques System to be improved 2

Product & Process development

5 Exists but needs improvement new Revision Drawing 7
techniques

6 Quality Policy Quality Policy defined / Same was displayed. 7

7 Information Flow system System evidenced. 7

8 Documentation need to be improve all area Documentation 6

9 5S need to be improve all area 6

Total score: 51
Points [(Total score/maximum score)*20]: 11.33

Audit Result :

Needs to be correct weak Area

CTP/IND/S001 Rev 0; Page 3 of 3