Initial Draft Resource Report 1 Project Description PDF

June 2014
Gulf LNG Liquefaction Project

Initial Draft Resource Report 1
General Project Description
Docket No. PF13-4-000
Public

Gulf LNG Liquefaction Company, LLC,
Gulf LNG Energy, LLC and
Gulf LNG Pipeline, LLC

569 Brookwood Center, Suite 749
Birmingham, AL
35209

June 2014

ii
Summary of Filing Information
Minimum Requirements Found in Section
1. Provide a detailed description and location map of the Project facilities. ( 380.12(c)(1)).
Include all pipeline and aboveground facilities.
Include support areas for construction or operation.
Identify facilities to be abandoned.
Section 1.4
Figures 1.1-1, 1.4-1, & 1.4-2,
Appendix 1.B
Section 1.9.2
2. Describe any non-jurisdictional facilities that would be built in association with the
Project. (380.12(c)(2)).
Include auxiliary facilities (see 2.55(a)).
Describe the relationship to the jurisdictional facilities.
Include ownership, land requirements, gas consumption, megawatt size,
construction status, and an update of the latest status of Federal, state, and local
permits/approvals.
Include the length and diameter of any interconnecting pipeline.
Apply the four-factor test to each facility (see 380.12(c)(2)(ii)).
Section 1.12

Section 1.12.1
3. Provide current original U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) 7.5-minute series topographic
maps with mileposts showing the Project facilities. (380.12(c)(3)).
Maps of equivalent detail are acceptable if legible (check with staff).
Show locations of all linear project elements, and label them.
Show locations of all significant aboveground facilities, and label them.
Appendix 1.B
4. Provide aerial images or photographs or alignment sheets based on these sources with
mileposts showing the Project facilities. (380.12(c)(3)).
No more than 1-year old.
Scale no smaller than 1:6,000.
Appendix 1.B
5. Provide plot/site plans of compressor stations showing the location of the nearest noise-
sensitive areas (NSA) within 1 mile. (380.12(c)(3,4)).
Scale no smaller than 1:3,600.
Show reference to topographic maps and aerial alignments provided above.
Not applicable. No
compressor stations associated
with Project. NSAs within 1
mile of Terminal will be
addressed in Resource Report
9
6. Describe construction and restoration methods. (380.12(c)(6)).
Include this information by milepost.
Make sure this is provided for offshore construction as well. For the offshore this
information is needed on a mile-by-mile basis and will require completion of
geophysical and other surveys before filing.
Section 1.7
7. Identify the permits required for construction across surface waters. (380.12(c)(9)).
Include the status of all permits.
For construction in the Federal offshore area be sure to include consultation with the
MMS File with the MMS for rights-of-way grants at the same time or before you
file with the FERC.
Section 1.10, Table 1.10-1
8. Provide the names and addresses of all affected landowners and certify that all affected
landowners will be notified as required in 157.6(d). (380.12(a)(4) and (c)(10)).
Affected landowners are defined in 157.6(d).
Provide an electronic copy directly to the environmental staff.
Section 1.11.2 , Appendix 1-C

iii
Minimum Requirements Found in Section
Additional Information
Describe all authorizations required to complete the proposed action and the status of
applications for such authorizations.
Section 1.10, Table 1.10-1
Provide plot/site plans of all other aboveground facilities that are not completely within the
right-of-way.
Appendix 1.B
Resource Report 13
Provide detailed typical construction right-of-way cross-section diagrams showing
information such as widths and relative locations of existing rights-of-way, new permanent
right-of-way, and temporary construction right-of-way.
Not Applicable.

Summarize the total acreage of land affected by construction and operation of the Project. Section 1.6
If Resource Report 5, Socioeconomics is not provided, provide the start and end dates of
construction, the number of pipeline spreads that would be used, and the workforce per
spread.
Section 1.7.1
Resource Report 5
Send two (2) additional copies of topographic maps and aerial images/photographs directly to
the environmental staff of the Office of Energy Projects (OEP).
Included with filing

iv
Contents
Summary of Filing Information................................................................................................................. ii
Contents ...................................................................................................................................................... iv
Acronyms and Abbreviations ................................................................................................................... vi
1. General Project Description ....................................................................................................... 1-1
1.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 1-1
1.2 History of Gulf LNG and Existing Facilities ................................................................................ 1-1
1.3 Purpose and Need ......................................................................................................................... 1-2
1.4 Proposed Facilities ........................................................................................................................ 1-3
1.4.1 Project Facilities .............................................................................................................. 1-3
1.5 Location Maps and Plot/Site Plans ............................................................................................... 1-7
1.6 Land Requirements ....................................................................................................................... 1-7
1.7 Construction Schedule and Procedures ......................................................................................... 1-7
1.7.1 Construction Schedule ..................................................................................................... 1-7
1.7.2 Construction Procedures .................................................................................................. 1-8
1.7.3 Environmental Compliance, Training, and Inspection .................................................. 1-10
1.8 Operation and Maintenance ........................................................................................................ 1-11
1.9 Future Expansion or Abandonment of Facilities ........................................................................ 1-11
1.9.1 Future Expansion ........................................................................................................... 1-11
1.9.2 Future Abandonment of Facilities ................................................................................. 1-12
1.10 Permits and Approvals ................................................................................................................ 1-12
1.11 Agency/Landowner Consultations .............................................................................................. 1-18
1.11.1 Agency Consultations .................................................................................................... 1-18
1.11.2 Affected Landowners ..................................................................................................... 1-18
1.12 Non-J urisdictional Facilities ....................................................................................................... 1-18
1.12.1 Four-Factor Test ............................................................................................................ 1-18
1.13 References ................................................................................................................................... 1-19

v
Tables
Table 1.6-1: Land Impacts Associated with Construction of the Gulf LNG Liquefaction Project ............ 1-7
Table 1.10-1: Permits, Approvals, and Certifications Required for Construction, Operation, and
Maintenance of the Gulf LNG Liquefaction Project ................................................................................ 1-13

Appendices
1.A Regulatory Correspondence
1.B Project Figures and Mapping
1.C Stakeholder Information (Volume II, Privileged and Confidential)

vi
Acronyms and Abbreviations
AGRU Acid Gas Removal Unit
APCI Air Products and Chemicals Incorporated
ASCE American Society of Civil Engineers
Bcf billion cubic feet
BOG boil-off gas
CEII Critical Energy Infrastructure Information
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
Destin Destin Pipeline Company, LLC
DOE U.S. Department of Energy
DOT U.S. Department of Transportation
EI Environmental Inspector
ER Environmental Report
ESA Endangered Species Act
ESD emergency shutdown
FEMA Federal Emergency Management Agency
FERC or Commission Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
FGT Florida Gas Transmission Company, LLC
FTA Free Trade Agreement
GLE Gulf LNG Energy, LLC
GLLC Gulf LNG Liquefaction Company, LLC
kV kilovolt
LNG liquefied natural gas
LNGC LNG carrier
LPG liquefied petroleum gas
MCHE Main Cryogenic Heat Exchanger
MMcf/d million cubic feet per day also referred to as million standard cubic feet
per day (MMscf/d)
MOF Marine Offloading Facility
MSFCMA Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act
MTPA million tonnes per annum
MW megawatt
NAVD 88 North American Vertical Datum 88
NEPA National Environmental Policy Act
NFPA National Fire Protection Association
NGA Natural Gas Act
NHPA National Historic Preservation Act
NMFS National Marine Fisheries Service
NOAA National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
NSA noise sensitive area
INITIAL DRAFT RESOURCE REPORT 1GENERAL PROJ ECT DESCRIPTION
vii
PCB polychlorinated biphenyl
PHMSA Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
Plan FERCs Upland Erosion Control, Revegetation, and Maintenance Plan
Procedures FERCs Wetland and Waterbody Construction and Mitigation
Procedures
Terminal Gulf LNG Terminal located in J ackson County, Mississippi
Transco Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC
U.S. United States
USFWS U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
USACE U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
USCG U.S. Coast Guard
USGS U.S. Geological Survey
WSA Waterway Suitability Assessment

1-1
INITIAL DRAFT RESOURCE REPORT 1
1. General Project Description
1.1 Introduction
Gulf LNG Liquefaction Company, LLC (GLLC), Gulf LNG Energy, LLC (GLE) and Gulf LNG
Pipeline, LLC, (GLP), are developing the proposed Gulf LNG Liquefaction Project (Project), which will
add liquefaction and export capabilities to GLEs existing Gulf LNG Terminal (Terminal) located in
J ackson County, Mississippi (Figure 1.1-1, Appendix 1.B).
The Project will include the installation of natural gas liquefaction and export facilities at the Terminal with a
total natural gas liquefaction capacity of approximately 10 million tonnes per annum (MTPA). These
facilities will allow liquefaction of domestic natural gas delivered by pipeline, storage of the LNG in the
Terminals existing LNG storage tanks, and loading of the stored LNG into LNG carriers (LNGCs) via the
Terminals existing marine jetty. The Terminal will retain its current capability to receive, store, regasify,
and deliver natural gas into the interstate pipeline system as originally constructed, thereby making the
Terminal bi-directional in terms of LNG import and export.
The Project will be constructed and operated in compliance with all applicable federal, state, and local
regulations. The Environmental Report (ER) for the Project includes Resource Reports 1 through 13 in
compliance with the requirements of Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or Commission)
regulations concerning ERs for Natural Gas Act (NGA) applications, 18 Code of Federal Regulations
(CFR) Sections 380.3 and 380.12, and in accordance with the FERC Order No. 665 (October 2005),
Pre-filing Procedures for Review of LNG Terminals and Other Natural Gas Facilities.
This Resource Report 1 provides a general description of the proposal to add LNG liquefaction and export
capabilities and functionality under Section 3 of the NGA to the previously authorized Terminal facilities and
for GLP to modify its pipeline facilities to the Terminal under Section 7(c) of the NGA. Resource Reports 2
through 9 describe the existing environment by resource, the potential impacts associated with construction
and operation of the Project, and proposed measures to mitigate these impacts. Resource Report 10 describes
the alternatives that were considered for the Project. Resource Report 11 contains a description of the design,
construction, operation, and maintenance measures that will be incorporated into the Project to prevent or
mitigate potential hazards to the public from failure of the Project components as a result of accidents or
natural catastrophes. Resource Report 12, pertaining to polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), is not applicable
to the Project as there is no PCB contamination at the Terminal. Finally, Resource Report 13 contains
additional detailed engineering and design information related to the Project.
The data for the aforementioned Resource Reports has been compiled utilizing United States (U.S.)
Geological Survey (USGS) topographic maps, recent aerial photography, publicly available information,
onsite investigations, and information obtained by consultation with appropriate federal and state agencies.
Copies of all correspondence are included in Appendix 1.A of this Resource Report 1.
1.2 History of Gulf LNG and Existing Facilities
GLEs Terminal is located near the City of Pascagoula in J ackson County, Mississippi, at the end of State
Highway 611 and is situated adjacent to the federally maintained Bayou Casotte Navigation Channel on the
Mississippi Sound. The Terminal is part of the Port of Pascagoula. The application for the construction and
operation of the Terminal and Gulf LNG Pipeline was filed in 2005 with the FERC in Docket Nos. CP06-12,
CP06-13, and CP06-14. The Commission issued its draft Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) on May
19, 2006, and the final EIS on November 24, 2006. On February 16, 2007, the Commission authorized GLE
and GLP to construct, own, and operate the Terminal and Gulf LNG Pipeline. The Terminal went in-service
on October 1, 2011.
1-2
The Terminal consists of the following facilities:
A single dock facility that is currently permitted to receive up to 170,000 cubic meter LNGC vessels;
Two (2) full containment LNG storage tanks, each with a capacity of 160,000 cubic meters;
State-of-the-art fire protection and other hazard detection systems located throughout the Terminal;
A concrete storm surge protection wall surrounding the Terminal that has an elevation of 27 feet
North American Vertical Datum 88 (NAVD 88). Two openings in the wall - one for the main
access road and another for dock access - are outfitted with watertight steel doors that may be closed
in the event of an approaching tropical system; and
Electrical service provided by Mississippi Power Company via a dedicated 23,000 volt line. A
transformer steps the voltage feed down to 4,160 volts for service to the Terminal via a single motor
control center. The Terminal also has two (2) gas turbine generators to provide essential backup
power generation, each having a capacity of approximately12 megawatts (MWs).
GLPs 36-inch send-out pipeline is used to transport regasified LNG from the Terminal to multiple
interconnect points with downstream interstate pipelines. The send-out pipeline is approximately 5 miles
long, running northerly from the Terminal, and has a Maximum Allowable Operating Pressure of 1,440 psi.
The send-out pipeline interconnects with the following downstream pipelines:
Gulfstream Natural Gas System, L.L.C (Gulfstream)
Destin Pipeline Company, L.L.C. (Destin)
A joint venture pipeline of Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC and Florida Gas
Transmission Company, LLC (Transco/FGT)
The send-out pipeline also interconnects with the BP Processing Facility.
1.3 Purpose and Need
The liquefaction facilities have been proposed due to the improved outlook for domestic natural gas
production, owing primarily to drilling productivity gains that have enabled growth in supplies from both
conventional and unconventional sources in the U.S. Improvements in drilling and extraction technologies
and efficiencies, combined with an expansion of the industrys understanding of the unconventional resource
base and sharing best practices for responsible resource development, have practically eliminated concerns of
declining future domestic natural gas production. As the NERA Economic Consulting (NERA 2012) study
commissioned by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) noted, the export of natural gas as LNG would
provide net economic benefits to the U.S. economy. More recently, on December 16, 2013, the
Administrator of the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) concluded, EIA's updated Reference
case shows that advanced technologies for crude oil and natural gas production are continuing to increase
domestic supply and reshape the U.S. energy economy as well as expand the potential for U.S. natural gas
exports (EIA 2013). Further benefits provided by this project would include:
Stimulating job creation, increasing economic activity and tax revenues by supporting a healthy
domestic drilling program, increasing pipeline construction and operations, constructing and
operating the liquefaction and terminal facilities at the Terminal, and by an increase in associated
support industries;
Creating a significant amount of economic activity and tax revenues, including an increase in port
tonnage and marine activity;
Enhancing U.S. energy security;

1-3
Increasing economic trade and ties with foreign nations, including neighboring countries in the
Americas;
Helping to achieve global greenhouse gas emissions targets through the promotion of clean
burning natural gas in countries that would otherwise use coal or oil for electric generation or
manufacturing processes;
Helping facilitate development of abundant natural gas in the U.S. and related jobs; and;
Helping to decrease U.S. dependence on foreign nations by increasing gas supply diversity to the
global market.
The economic benefits of the abundant and available natural gas supply would be amplified, not
compromised, through the permitting of export projects, including the Project, and there is a compelling
need to provide for such economic benefits in the context of the U.S. economic recovery. The NERA
study Macroeconomic Impacts of LNG Exports from the United States (NERA 2012) found that for
every one of the market scenarios examined, net economic benefits increased as the level of LNG exports
increased. There is also an increasing need among world markets for access to cleaner, affordable
sources of energy, which this Project would expressly provide.
1.4 Proposed Facilities
The proposed Project will be constructed on approximately 113 acres adjacent to the existing 33 acre
Terminal south of Pascagoula, Mississippi (Figure 1.4-1, Appendix 1.B). The Project will be located
within areas previously evaluated and assessed in conjunction with the FERCs earlier review and
approval of the Terminal in Docket No. CP06-12. The footprint of the proposed Project facilities is
shown on Figure 1.4-2 (Appendix 1.B). Construction of the Project will be performed primarily within
the indicated Project footprint. Additional offsite areas will be required for Project staging, warehouse
yards, contractor offices, and parking.
The Project will involve construction in two phases of two liquefaction trains, each capable of producing
approximately 5 MTPA of LNG for export, along with the required support utilities and infrastructure and
modifications to the GLE Terminal, GLP Pipeline and certain GLP meter stations to enable bidirectional
operations.
A general description of the involved Project facilities is provided below. More detailed facility
descriptions are provided in Resource Report 13.
1.4.1 Project Facilities
1.4.1.1 Metering Facilities
The Metering Facilities are existing facilities that will be modified to be bi-directional. The existing
Metering Facilities consist of a gas metering station, a pig receiver, and a pressure let-down station.
Filters will be added to remove trace quantities of solids which could plug downstream equipment.
1.4.1.1.1 GLP Modifications to Gulfstream Metering Station
Piping modifications will be made to the existing Gulfstream metering skid to permit bi-directional
flow.
1.4.1.1.2 GLP Modifications to Destin Metering Station
Piping modifications will be made to the existing Destin metering skid to permit bi-directional flow.
1.4.1.1.3 GLP Modifications to Transco/FGT Interconnect
Piping modifications will be made to the existing Transco/FGT interconnect to permit bi-directional
flow.
1-4
1.4.1.2 GLP Pipeline Modifications
The GLP pipeline is an existing facility that will be modified to be bi-directional. The 36-inch pipeline
will be modified on the pipeline side of the 36-inch battery-limits valve to provide a connection to the
inlet of the LNG liquefaction pre-treatment facilities.
1.4.1.3 Pretreatment Facilities
Pretreatment facilities are provided to remove impurities in the natural gas stream that have no heating
value, could be corrosive to, or could solidify in downstream units, or which must be removed to meet
product LNG specifications.
The pretreatment facilities consist of:
Mercury Removal - natural gas could contain trace levels of mercury which could damage the
aluminum-based heat exchangers in the liquefaction section. Mercury removal is accomplished
by adsorption through either a sulfur impregnated activated carbon or a metal sulfide based
catalyst.
Acid Gas Removal Unit (AGRU) - Acid gases, consisting primarily of carbon dioxide with
trace quantities of other contaminants (such as hydrogen sulfide), are removed from the feed
natural gas by means of absorption in a water-based lean solvent in an Acid Gas Absorber
Dehydration - Treated natural gas from the AGRU will be saturated with water. The water must
be removed to avoid water freezing in the downstream cryogenic liquefaction section.
Heavy Hydrocarbon Removal - The purpose of heavy hydrocarbon removal is to meet product
LNG specifications as well as to recover refrigerant makeup components from the feed gas.
1.4.1.4 Liquefaction Trains
Each phase of the Project will consist of installation of one liquefaction train equal to an approximate,
nominal output capacity of 5 MTPA. The configuration of the LNG Trains will be based on the Air
Products and Chemicals Incorporated (APCI C3-MR) process with one APCI manufactured Main
Cryogenic Heat Exchanger (MCHE) per train. In each LNG train, the Propane and Mixed Refrigerant
compressors will be driven by two (2) GE Frame 7EA gas turbines and associated helper motors. Gas will
be cooled and liquefied by heat exchange with a mixture of propane, ethane, and methane in a MCHE.
The product LNG liquid stream leaves the MCHE and passes through the energy extraction LNG
Hydraulic Turbine, which reduces the pressure of the LNG. This energy extraction effectively serves as
low level refrigeration that reduces LNG temperature and increases LNG production. The LNG is then
sent to the existing cryogenic storage tanks and stored at atmospheric pressure at approximately -256 F.
1.4.1.5 Ship Loading Modifications
New in-tank LNG loading pumps will be installed in the existing LNG storage tanks to transfer LNG to
LNGCs through the existing transfer lines. Minor changes will be made to the piping to the marine
loading arms to permit bi-directional flow. There will be no change in the capacity or operating pressure
of the existing transfer line during the proposed loading operation.
1.4.1.6 Extension of Storm Surge Protection Wall
The existing concrete storm surge protection wall will be modified to enclose the entire Terminal,
including the new liquefaction facilities. Either a section of the existing wall will be removed or openings
will be installed in the wall to permit access between the existing and new facilities.
1.4.1.7 Utilities and Support Facilities
Ancillary utilities and support facilities needed to support the liquefaction trains will include the
following:
1-5
Fuel Gas System - the Fuel Gas System collects and mixes hydrocarbon vapors generated in the
facility with pretreated feed gas downstream of the Molecular Sieve Driers make-up to serve as
the fuel source for facility consumers.
Flare Systems - Warm Flare and Cold Flare systems will be provided for the safe disposal of
hydrocarbon streams during upset or emergency release scenarios. Flare options are currently
being evaluated based on safety and operational requirements.
Hot Oil System - Process heating will be provided by a circulating hot-oil-based system. Heating
of the oil will be accomplished through a Hot Oil Heater, which is a gas-fired furnace.
Instrument and Utility Air System - An air system will be provided to supply compressed dry air
to control systems (instrument air), and wet air to pneumatic tools and other utility consumers
(plant air), as well as the Nitrogen Generation System.
Nitrogen Generation System - The nitrogen will be used for refrigerant makeup, compressor seal
gas, pump seal purges, flare header purge gas, non-LNG storage tank and expansion drum blanket
gas, instrument and electrical panel purges, and other uses. A Nitrogen Generation System will be
generated on site, as needed, to produce gaseous nitrogen from compressed air supplied from the
Air System.
Utility/Potable/Demineralized Water System
o Utility water from the Utility/Firewater Tank will supply water to the tempered
water system for initial fill and make-up, to the utility water distribution system,
to and to the Potable Water and the Demineralized Water systems for further
purification.
o Potable water will be pumped from Potable Water Storage Tank and supplied to the
eyewashes, safety showers, and buildings.
o Demineralized water from Demineralized Water Storage Tank will be pumped to Solvent
Storage Tank, AGRU, and Aqueous Ammonia Storage Tank for water makeup.
Demineralized water will also be used for gas turbine washing.
Tempered Water System - The Tempered Water System is a closed loop circulation system that
provides cooling for compressor lube oil systems in the LNG Trains.
Firewater System - The Firewater System will include a combination of detection and mitigation
measures to minimize the risks of a fire event to the LNG Trains and utility and support facilities.
The Firewater System will be designed in accordance with the requirements of the National Fire
Protection Association (NFPA) NFPA 59A.
Essential Backup Power Generation Additional generator(s) will be installed to serve as a
reliable power source for critical equipment and safe plant shutdown in the event of local utility
power failure.
Refrigerant Storage - The Refrigerant Storage System provides storage and transfer capability for
the ethane and propane used for refrigerant make-up. The ethane and propane will be stored in
dedicated on-site storage: ethane in bullets and propane in spheres.
Condensate Storage - The Condensate Storage system will include 1 storage tank, pumps, and a
truck-loading station for periodic truck-out of the recovered hydrocarbon condensate.
Amine Solvent Storage - The Amine Storage System provides storage and transfer capability for
amine solvents. The Fresh Amine solvent will be imported and stored in Solvent Storage Tank to
1-6
provide makeup to the AGRU. The same tank is also used as a de-inventory tank for solvent from
AGRU when required.
Aqueous Ammonia Storage - Aqueous Ammonia Storage is designed to receive and store
aqueous ammonia for distribution to the LNG trains. The aqueous ammonia is pumped to
injection skids for vaporization and supply to the Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) units of
the gas turbines.
Waste Water System Amine containing equipment and piping drains within the AGRU will be
drained through a closed system to a collection drum for recycling back to the amine system.
Potentially, amine- and hydrocarbon-contaminated regeneration water from the Dehydration Unit
will be routed to the Thermal Oxidizers for disposal.
Spill Containment System - The Project will provide a LNG spill containment system designed
and constructed to comply with DOT regulations 49 C.F.R. Part 193 Sections 193.2149 through
193.2185. These regulations require that each LNG transfer system be provided with a means of
secondary containment which has been sized to hold the quantity of LNG that could be released
as a result of the design spill which is appropriate for the area and LNG equipment.
Storm Water System - One or more storm water outfalls will be installed to remove (i.e., pump)
any storm water that collects within the storm surge protection wall to the Mississippi Sound
through the Terminals berthing area. Secondary containment also will be provided for chemical
storage and/or oil storage within the Projects processing area. In accordance with standard
industry practice, these containment areas will only be drained to the site storm water
management system following inspection by on-site staff. If there are any visual signs of oil or
hazardous materials present, storm water from containment areas will be retained until cleanup
can be completed and the source of the contaminants is repaired or replaced
Buildings New or modified warehouse, maintenance, control, and office buildings will be
constructed onsite. The Terminals existing warehouse/maintenance building will be relocated to
minimize vehicle traffic and security escort requirements within the secure/restricted area of the
Terminal. The Terminals existing control room and administration building will be relocated.
The size of the buildings will accommodate the new requirements of the liquefaction Project and
will be elevated for storm surge protection.
Hazard Detection System - The Project will comply with 49 C.F.R. Part 193, 33 C.F.R.
127.205, and NFPA 59A by monitoring all areas where the potential for combustible/flammable
gas concentrations exist.
Emergency Shutdown System - In accordance with CFR Part 127.201(b), the loading system
(marine terminal) will have detectors measuring LNG concentrations that will automatically
activate the emergency shutdown (ESD) system if concentrations exceed 40 percent of the
lower flammable limit. For the remainder of facility (liquefaction, refrigerant storage, etc.), fire
and gas detectors will only activate alarm systems and will not operate or initiate any facility
shutdowns. Audible alarms will be provided throughout the facility area to alert plant
operators. Operators at any of the control stations would take the appropriate actions to safeguard
the equipment and the terminal. All hazard detection, hazard control and emergency shutdown
systems will be fully integrated into the control room.
Security System - GLLC will work with GLE to revise its existing security plan, in accordance
with the Maritime 33 C.F.R. Part 105 and 49 C.F.R. Part 193, to incorporate the liquefaction
facilities.
1-7
1.5 Location Maps and Plot/Site Plans
The general location of the Project is depicted in Figure 1.1-1 (Appendix 1.B). The specific locations of
the Project facilities are shown on Figure 1.4-1 (Appendix 1.B), and on the USGS topographic quadrangle
excerpts (8-1/2-inch by 11-inch and scale of 1:24,000) located in Appendix 1.B of this report. All other
areas discussed in this Resource Report 1 are shown on additional figures in Appendix 1.B. Full-size
USGS topographic quadrangle maps are provided as a separate attachment to this report. Project facility
site plans and schematic drawings are provided in Resource Report 13.
1.6 Land Requirements
A summary of land requirements for the Project is provided in Table 1.6-1. Approximately 193 acres will
be affected by construction of the Project, of which approximately 113 acres will be permanently required
for operation of the Project.
TABLE 1.6-1: LAND IMPACTS ASSOCIATED WITH CONSTRUCTION OF THE GULF LNG
LIQUEFACTION PROJECT
Facility Land Impacted by Construction Land Impacted During
Operations
a

(acres) (acres)
Liquefaction Trains and
Support Facilities
65 65
New Control/Admin
Buildings
4 4
Construction Staging Areas 11 11
Marine Offloading Facility 5 0
Existing Facilities 33 33
Offsite Wareyard Area 75 0
Total 193 113
a
Site preparation earthwork required for the plant site construction staging areas will be excavated, filled,
and stabilized as required. This land will not be restored following use because it will be used in
operation as a staging area for plant maintenance turn-arounds.
1.7 Construction Schedule and Procedures
1.7.1 Construction Schedule
The overall schedule for the construction of the Project, which is detailed in Resource Report 13, is
expected to be approximately 42 months from commencement of site preparation to the completion of
Phase II. The construction of the two LNG liquefaction trains will be staggered to balance the workforce.
The construction of the first LNG liquefaction train and common utilities will take approximately 36
months. The construction of the second LNG liquefaction train will be initiated shortly after the start of
the first train and will conclude approximately 6 months after the completion of the first train. The
detailed schedule for the Project is provided in Resource Report 13.
1-8
1.7.2 Construction Procedures
The Project facilities will be designed, constructed, operated, and maintained in accordance with the U.S.
Department of Transportation (DOT) Federal Safety Standards for Liquefied Natural Gas Facilities, 49
CFR Part 193 and NFPA 59A. GLLC will adopt the FERC Upland Erosion Control, Revegetation and
Maintenance Plan (Plan) and Wetland and Waterbody Construction and Mitigation Procedures
(Procedures), with modifications, which will be implemented as well as all Project conditions resulting
from the Order and Project permits.
Typical Project construction activities are summarized below. The general schedule for the major Project
construction activities and the average construction workforce is provided in Resource Report 5.
1.7.2.1 Mobilization
Upon receipt of Project permits and clearances, Project labor and supervision with necessary equipment
will be mobilized to site to construct the temporary construction facilities and to commence site
preparation earthworks activities. Additional labor and equipment will be mobilized to site as required to
facilitate each subsequent phase of the work.
1.7.2.2 Temporary Facilities
Temporary facilities necessary to support Project construction will be located around the construction site.
The temporary facilities will include equipment and material laydown areas, contractor offices and
parking areas, warehouses, and workshops. Due to space constraints within the existing facility, it will be
necessary to locate and utilize a significant portion of the required temporary facilities offsite in the
general Pascagoula area.
It will also be necessary to construct a temporary Marine Offloading Facility (MOF) to facilitate
movement of equipment too large to be transported by road onto the construction site. Tentative plans call
to locate that offloading facility in the northwestern-most portion of the Terminal owned property at the
mouth of Bayou Casotte in the Mississippi Sound.
1.7.2.3 Clearing, Grading, and Excavation
Previously, Fugro Consultants, LP performed a subsurface geotechnical and seismic investigation as part
of the LNG regasification facility preconstruction activities. The investigation examined the properties of
the existing soil and subsurface materials. Investigation results became the basis for the determination of
appropriate ground improvements and foundation designs. A similar geotechnical and seismic
investigation will be performed for the new liquefaction facility. This second investigation will take into
account the preexisting facility investigation results and expand upon it to include the new liquefaction
trains, related utility areas and facility storm surge wall. The original investigation report, together with
the facility liquefaction geotechnical and seismic investigation are included in the Reconnaissance
Geotechnical Study report and included in Section 13.3 of Resource Report 13.
Based on the results of the report, the general description of the site work is essentially to fill and grade
the existing site to a proposed elevation of 12.0 to 15.0 feet NAVD 88 in the Process Area and to
elevation of 10.0 to 12.0 feet NAVD 88 in other areas. The subgrade preparation work will begin with
the preparation of ground surface by first removing trees, stumps, roots, vegetation, logs, rubbish and
other unsuitable materials. The grade will then be cut to elevation 3.5 feet NAVD 88, which will expose
soft to firm clay fill or fine grained clayey sandy fill. To provide a good working surface, the exposed
surface soil will be chemically stabilized with lime-fly ash to a depth of 8 to 10 inches and then be re-
compacted to a minimum of 92 percent of standard proctor ASTM D698 test procedures. Any free water
will be drained from the site by establishing positive drainage with ditches or pumping from the sumps.
Low lying areas with standing water will be backfilled with coarse aggregate such that standing water is
no longer exposed. An 8 oz. / yd., non-woven, needle-punched geo-fabric will be placed over, and in
good contact with the prepared ground surface prior to placement of general fill.

1-9
A bi-axial Geogrid equivalent to Tensar BX 1200 will then be placed on top of the geofabric and extend at
least 10 feet beyond the toe of the proposed general fill. This will act as a separator between the subgrade
and the structural fill used to raise the site elevation to the design level. The initial fill layer will be 16
inches thick of well graded, coarse aggregate over the geofabric and bi-axial Geogrid compacted to a
minimum of 90 percent of standard proctor per ASTM D698.
A second bi-axial Geogrid layer will then be placed over the well graded aggregate. A 16-inch thick second
layer of well-graded aggregate will be placed over the second bi-axial Geogrid. Aggregate will be placed in
8 inch lifts and compacted to at least 95 percent of standard proctor per ASTM D698. General fill will then
be placed and compacted to at least 95 percent ASTM D698 to raise the site grade to elevation 4 feet.
Select fill will be used to raise the grade in all areas from elevation 4 feet to the design grade of elevations
varying from 10.0 to 15.0 feet and placed in uniform loose lifts not exceeding 8 inches thick and extending
across the entire planed raised area.
Site grading will also include finish grading of the entire site for roadways, culverts, ditches, ramps and
swales etc. Finish grading will include concrete paving, with curbs for surfaced process areas, general
gravel surfacing and applications of top soils, seeding and mulching for grass areas.
GLLC will adopt FERCs Plan and Procedures, with modifications, as well as the Coastal Construction
Manual as instructed by Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Mitigation Directorate to
ensure that potential effects on soils due to construction activities of the facility are minimal.
1.7.2.4 Storm Surge Protection Wall
The existing storm surge protection wall will be extended to encircle the new liquefaction facilities. The
storm surge protection wall will have a finished elevation of 27 feet NAVD 88. The area within the storm
surge protection wall will be filled to between +12 feet and +18 feet NAVD 88. Portions of the existing
storm surge protection wall contained within the new perimeter storm surge protection wall will be
removed, as required, to accommodate the new facility additions.
1.7.2.5 Foundations
Foundations for heavy equipment and structures will be installed on precast or steel piles that will be
delivered to the site by barge to the temporary MOF or by truck. Piles will be installed in a manner to
efficiently complete piling operations on a schedule that will best support the subsequent construction
operations. After pile driving is complete, pile caps consisting of formwork, rebar installation, and pouring
of concrete will be installed at the top of each pile. Consideration is also being given to utilizing drilled
displacement piling in applications where appropriate.
Lighter equipment and structures will be supported by foundations laid directly on compacted soil.
1.7.2.6 Underground Utilities
The underground portion of utilities, such as water, fire water, electrical, and communications, will be
installed throughout the new Project area.
1.7.2.7 Materials and Equipment Delivery
Materials and equipment required for the liquefaction facilities include the main processing equipment
(such heat exchangers, gas compressors, gas turbines, vessel, tanks, etc.), piping, steel for equipment
supports and pipe racks, and utility package systems such as water treatment units. The majority of the
Project will be constructed completely onsite using a stick-build (from the ground up) construction
approach, although some of the components (e.g. package systems and/or pipe racks) may be preassembled
off site and delivered to the site as modularized packages.
Materials and equipment will be shipped from the place of origin to the Port of Pascagoula and off-loaded
near the site at staging and laydown areas, and via barge to the MOF. Materials and equipment may also be
brought in by rail or trucked to the site. Charter delivery by barge of large equipment shipments will be
1-10
made directly to the Terminal grounds and offloaded onto the site via a temporary MOF. Trucks/equipment
will transport materials from the offloading area through the Terminal to the respective facility construction
areas. Existing terminal roads will be upgraded as required to allow for heavy hauls deliveries.
1.7.2.8 Erection
Equipment and pipe racks will be set on their respective foundations. As the pipe racks are completed,
work will begin on the installation of above ground process and utility piping and cable trays. As the major
equipment is set, piping, electrical and instrumentation tie-ins would commence.
1.7.2.9 Testing
As systems are installed, appropriate testing will be done to ensure integrity and safety of the various
components. This will include items such as hydrotesting and pneumatic testing of piping, testing of
electrical cables, calibration of instruments, loop checks for control circuits, and check-outs by equipment
vendors.
1.7.2.10 Commissioning and Start-up
As individual systems become available, they will be commissioned according to a detailed plan to ensure
they are ready for proper operation. Actual start-up of the new equipment may begin once the
commissioning process is completed for each system.
1.7.3 Environmental Compliance, Training, and Inspection
GLLC is committed to designing, building, and conducting their operations in ways that minimize adverse
impact on human health and the environment. GLLC will ensure that applicable environmental
requirements are incorporated in construction documents, will conduct environmental training, will employ
at least one environmental inspector (EI), and will provide routine monitoring during all phases of
construction, cleanup and restoration.
GLLC will include Project-specific environmental requirements that will be part of the construction
contract documents. These documents and requirements will include applicable permits, FERCs Plan and
Procedures, FERC Section 3 authorization conditions, and other environmental requirements. GLLC will
effectively communicate to its contractor(s) the environmental requirements for the Project. If, during
construction, a contractor is found to be in violation of an environmental requirement, GLLC will require
an immediate correction of the problem, issue a stop work order if necessary, and resolve any disciplinary
issue with the contractor.
Before any construction begins, GLLC will conduct intensive environmental training for the inspector(s) to
familiarize them with the specific conditions and issues associated with the Project. Separate training of the
contractor personnel will also be undertaken to familiarize all personnel with the environmental
requirements of the Project. As new personnel are assigned to the Project, training will be conducted for
these personnel as well.
GLLC considers the role of the EI to be a critical part of the Construction Management Team. During
construction, the EI will have the authority at all times to assess and evaluate any construction-related
activity to confirm compliance with the environmental conditions of all local, state, and federal agency
permits or certificates. GLLC will be responsible for the selection, employment, training, and guidance of
the EI. The duties of the EI are to monitor and report on those activities designated as environmental scope
of work in the construction contracts, such as erosion control, re-vegetation, construction signage,
environmental permit compliance, threatened and endangered species protection, and fencing of
environmentally sensitive sites. The role of the EI is not to inspect the physical construction of the facilities
(welding, lowering-in, pressure testing, etc.) but to provide guidance to other inspectors monitoring these
activities related to the conditions of environmental permits or authorizations.
The EI will attend the meetings of the Construction Management Team. The EI will report, as appropriate,
to the Chief Construction Inspector and/or Construction Manager at the meetings on all environmental-
1-11
related activities of the construction contractor(s). GLLCs environmental project manager personnel will
maintain contact with the EI at the appropriate levels throughout the Project.
An EI will be present onsite on a daily basis during construction of the Project. The objective is to keep the
Project moving forward within the guidelines established by GLLC and the regulating environmental
agencies. The EI will work with the construction foreman/crew to provide interpretation and enforcement
of all local, state and federal environmental regulations. If an agreement on an interpretation of an
environmental condition cannot be reached between the EI and construction personnel, the issue will be
raised to the environmental project manager and GLLCs Project Manager as necessary. The field crews
will then implement the interpretation and final resolution.
The environmental project manager and GLLCs Project Manager will review daily reports generated by
the EI. The EI will also complete field reports for agency notification. The environmental project manager
and GLLCs project manager will review all agency notifications. Any agency notifications required by
permit conditions will be made by the environmental project manager.
1.8 Operation and Maintenance
GLE has on file with the FERC Office of Pipeline Safety and USCG, operations manuals for the current
facilities. GLLC will coordinate with GLE to update the manuals as necessary to accommodate the new
liquefaction facilities and submit amendments to the agencies prior to commissioning the Project.
All systems for the operation of the liquefaction facilities, storage tanks and ship loading will be controlled
and monitored through a central control room. All hazard detection, hazard control, security and emergency
shutdown systems will be fully integrated into the control room.
GLLC will coordinate with GLE to amend the existing facility maintenance plans to include the proposed
facility modifications. GLLC will operate under a maintenance regime that will include corrective and
preventative maintenance plans. The plan will include written procedures consistent with corporate policy
and federal standards, including regulations at 33 CFR Part 127.401 and 49 CFR Part 193 subpart G.
The liquefaction units are designed with an ESD System which is incorporated to safely shut down the
facility in the event of an emergency. Emergency shutdown and depressurization of the Liquefaction
Facility can be initiated immediately, dependent on the emergency. The timeline for an emergency
shutdown of the liquefaction process in an emergency can be a matter of seconds.
A controlled shutdown would usually begin with feed rate reduction followed potentially by de-inventory
of stored hydrocarbon levels in vessels. Advance warning of one-half hour to one hour will give the
operator time to transfer inventory and shut down and/or blow down inventory to the flare if required. In
the event that advance warning of an impending shutdown during emergency events is not available to
allow a controlled shutdown of the unit, the ESD System is designed to safely take the plant out of service
within seconds.
All operations and maintenance personnel for the Project will be trained to properly and safely perform
their jobs including the potential hazards associated with cryogenic LNG operations and the proper
operations of all equipment. Operators will meet the training requirements of the U.S. Coast Guard, DOT,
and other regulatory entities. All maintenance plans will be implemented by trained maintenance
technicians reporting to a Maintenance Supervisor.
1.9 Future Expansion or Abandonment of Facilities
1.9.1 Future Expansion
GLLC, GLE, and GLP currently have no plans for future expansion beyond those proposed in this
application.
1-12
1.9.2 Future Abandonment of Facilities
GLLC, GLE, and GLP have no plans for abandonment of any of their respective facilities.
1.10 Permits and Approvals
Construction, operation, and maintenance of the proposed Project will be in accordance with all applicable
federal, state, and local permits and approvals. The environmental permits and approvals, administering
agencies, and status of correspondence required for the Project are presented in Table 1.10-1.

1-13
TABLE 1.10-1: PERMITS, APPROVALS, AND CERTIFICATIONS REQUIRED FOR CONSTRUCTION, OPERATION, AND
MAINTENANCE OF THE GULF LNG LIQUEFACTION PROJECT
Permit/Approval Administering Agency Contact Initiated Process Status

Federal
Section 3 and
Section 7 of the
Natural Gas Act
Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission
Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
888 First Street, N.E.
Room 1A
Washington, D.C. 20426
5/1/2014 - Meeting with FERC
Staff to introduce GLLC Project.
5/9/2014 Provided FERC with
supplementary Project information.
5/21/2014 Received approval to initiate
FERCs pre-filing process
Authorization to
Import and Export
Natural Gas,
including LNG
U.S. Department of
Energy (DOE)
Larine A. Moore
U.S. Department of Energy
1000 Independence Ave., SW
Washington, DC 20585
202-586-9478
Free Trade Agreement (FTA) -
GLLC has received authorization
to export LNG to FTA countries.
Non-FTA GLLC applied for
authorization to export LNG to
non-FTA countries on 8/31/2012

FTA FE Docket No. 12-47-LNG, GLLC has
received authorization to export LNG to FTA
countries
Non-FTA FE Docket No. 12-101-LNG
Approval pending

Lisa C. Tracy, Natural Gas Analyst
Routing: FE-34.2
Building: FORS
Washington, DC 202-586-4523
lisa.tracy@hq.doe.gov
6/06/2014 - Lisa Tracy has requested
cooperating status for the DOE and requests
that she participate in all future conference
calls and communications on the Project. Lisa
will prepare a letter to the Commission
requesting cooperating status.
Waterway
Suitability
Assessment
(WSA)
U.S. Coast Guard
(USCG)
Duke Walker, Captain of the Port
Mobile Sector - Waterways
Management Division
1500 5th Street, Brookley Complex
Mobile, Alabama 36615-1300
251-441-5940

Scott Muller Commander
(251) 441-5284
12/11/2012 - GLLC submitted a
letter to the U.S. Coast Guard
requesting a determination that
this Project would not require a
new Letter of Recommendation
(LOR) or a new Waterway
Suitability Assessment (WSA).
1/17/2013 - U.S. Coast Guard issued a letter
stating that the existing LOR and WSA would
remain valid and not require revisions based
on GLLCs statement that the proposed
modifications in this Project would not alter
the Marine Transfer Area in a way that would
result in an increased capacity beyond the
existing Waterway Suitability Assessment.
4/29/2014 contacted Scott Muller as part of
pre-filing outreach
1-14

Safety and Security
Review
U.S. Department of
Transportation
(DOT), Pipeline and
Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration
(PHMSA)
Ms. Melanie Barber
Emergency Support and Response
Officer
Office of Pipeline Safety, PHMSA
1200 New J ersey Avenue, SE

M. Buddy Secor, J r. PE
General Engineer
Engineering and Research Division
PHP-80
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
1200 New J ersey Avenue, SE, E22-
327
(202) 493-0452 Desk
(202) 754-2594 Cell
buddy.secor@dot.gov
04/18/2014 - Correspondence sent
to introduce the Project and to
determine the agencys
willingness to participate in the
FERCs pre-filing process.
5/1/2014 Received email message from
M.Buddy Secor, J r. that Ms. Barber had
retired and that he was helping to coordinate
LNG applications at PHMSA. 5/7/2014 --
Exchanged emails with Mr. Secor and
provided a copy of the 4/18/14
correspondence letter.
5/8/2014 Left message with Mr. Secor, to
follow up with 4/18/14 correspondence letter.
Response pending.
Endangered Species
Act (ESA)
Section 7
Consultation
USFWS Paul Necaise
Mississippi Field Office Ecological
Services
6578 Dogwood View Pkwy, Suite A
J ackson, MS 39213
228-493-6631
5/8/2014 contacted Paul Necaise to follow
up with 4/18/2014 correspondence letter. Mr.
Necaise will be involved in the pre-filing
process and plans to attend scoping meetings,
if available.

1-15

Section 7
Consultation (ESA),
Marine Mammal
Protection Act,
MagnusonStevens
Fishery
Conservation and
Management Act
(MSFCMA)
National Oceanic and
Atmospheric
Administration
(NOAA)
National Marine
Fisheries Service
(NMFS)
Ryan Hendron
Southeast Regional Office
263 13th Ave. South
St. Petersburg, FL 33701
727-551-5610
Heather Young
Habitat Conservation Division
4700 Avenue U, Building 307
Galveston, Texas 77551-5997
(409) 766-3699

5/8/2014 Left message with Ryan Hendron
to follow up with 4/18/2014 correspondence
letter. Response pending.

5/8/2014 Left message with Mark
Thompson to follow up with 4/18/2014
correspondence letter. Response pending.

Information has been provided that Mark
Thompson has retired. GLLC to identify new
agency contact.
Clean Water Act,
Section 404; Rivers
and Harbors Act,
Section 10
Section 103 of the
Marine Protection,
Research and
Sanctuaries Act
(MPRSA) w/ EPA
U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (USACE),
Mobile District
Munther Sahawneh
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Mobile District
109 St. J oseph Street
Mobile, AL 36602
251-690-2658

Allison Monroe
(251) 690-3228

Colonel J on Chytka
(251) 690-2512

Peter Taylor - Deputy District
Engineer
(251) 690-2513
J ay Smitherman - Chief, Civil Works
Branch
(251) 694-3701

04/14/2014 USACE was
contacted about the Project in
general and its impacts

4/21/2014 contacted during pre-
filing outreach
filing outreach

filing outreach

5/8/2014 contacted to follow up with
4/18/2014 correspondence letter. Mr.
Sahawneh or a representative from his office
will be involved in the pre-filing process and
plans to attend scoping meetings.

6/12/2014 Project teammet with USACE
Mobile District to present preliminary Project
plans, discuss impacts to Waters of the U.S.,
and potential mitigation options.

1-16

Construction Within
a Floodplain
Federal Emergency
Management Agency
(FEMA), Region IV
Susan Wilson
3003 Chamblee Tucker Road
Atlanta, GA 30341
770-220-5200
5/8/2014 Left message with Susan Wilson to
follow up with 4/18/2014 correspondence
State
Mississippi
Listed Species
Consultation
Mississippi Natural
Science
Museum/Mississippi
Department of Wildlife,
Fisheries and Parks
Andy Sanderson
Natural Heritage Program Coordinator
2148 Riverside Drive
J ackson, MS 39202
601-576-6000
5/8/2014 Left message with Andy Sanderson
05/12/2014 received response from
MDWFP providing list of protected species
within 2 miles of Project site and
recommendations to avoid impacts.
CWA, Section 401
State Water Quality
Determination Joint
Review for Coastal
Wetlands
Mississippi Department
of Marine Resources
(MDMR) - Bureau of
Wetland Permitting

Willa Brantley
Wetland Permitting Program
Coordinator
1141 Bayview Ave
Biloxi MS 39532
228-523-4108
Correspondence sent on
04/18/2014 to introduce the Gulf
LNG Liquefaction Project and to
NEPA pre-filing review process.
5/8/2014 Left message with Willa Brantley
CWA, Section 401
State Water Quality
Determination

of Environmental
Quality (MDEQ)
Florance Bass
515 East Amite Street
J ackson, MS 39201
601-961-5164
5/8/2014 Left message with Florance Bass
Clean Air Act
MDEQ Bryan Collins
Branch Chief of Energy and
Transportation
515 E. Amite St.,
J ackson, MS, 39201
601-961-5239
5/8/2014 contacted Bryan Collins to follow
up with 4/18/2014 correspondence letter. Mr.
Collins will be involved in the pre-filing
process and plans to attend scoping meetings.
Coastal Zone
Management Act
Coastal Zone
Consistency
MDMR, Coastal Zone
Management Office
Willa Brantley
Coordinator
1141 Bayview Ave
Biloxi MS 39532
228-523-4108
5/8/2014 Left message with Willa Brantley
1-17

National Historic
Preservation Act
(NHPA), Section
106 Consultation
of Archives and
History-State Historic
Preservation Office

J im Woodrick
Division Director
Mississippi Department of Archives
and History
100 South State Street
J ackson, MS 39201
601-576-6908
5/8/2014 Left message with J im Woodrick
5/9/2014 MDAH confirmed their intention
to participate in FERCs pre-filing process.
6/3/2014 MDAH provided map indicating
areas of concern.
6/11/2014 MDAH expressed concerns
regarding cultural resources in the Project
area, recommended surveys.
NHPA, Section 106
Consultation
Eastern Band of
Cherokee Indians
Principal Chief Michell Hicks
P.O. Box 455
Quall Boundary
Cherokee, NC 28719
828-497-7000
Consultation to be conducted in
coordination with MDAH
5/21/2014 Correspondence sent to introduce
the Project.
NHPA, Section 106
Consultation
Mississippi Band of
Choctaw Indians
Mr. Kenneth H. Carleton
Tribal Historic Preservation
Officer/Archaeologist
101 Industrial Road
Choctaw, MS 39350
Phone: (601) 650-7316
5/21/2014 Correspondence sent to introduce
the Project.
Local

J ackson County Port
Authority (Director)
and Commission
Mark McAndrews 05/01/2014 - Port Authorities
attended the J ackson County
Economic Development
Foundation Meeting where GLLC
made a presentation about the
Project
05/13/2014 GLLC made a
presentation about the
Project. They want to attend
Open House and evidence their
support

06/03/2014 - Invitations to Open House were
sent to Port Authority
1-18
1.11 Agency/Landowner Consultations
GLLC has endeavored to include landowners, regulatory and resource agencies, and others in the early
planning stages of the proposed Project. As discussed below, federal, state, and local agencies were given the
opportunity to comment on the Project during the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) pre-filing
review process in Docket No. PF13-4-000.
Correspondence since April 18, 2014 with federal, state, and local agencies can be found in Appendix 1.A.
GLLC will file any additional correspondences and approvals with FERC upon receipt. GLLC will obtain all
necessary permits, clearances, and licenses related to the Project, and will observe and comply with all
federal, state, and local laws, ordinances, and regulations governing the Project.
1.11.1 Agency Consultations
GLLC initiated an effort early in the proposed Project to work with all federal, state, and local regulatory
agencies with an interest in the Project. In order to solicit input and guidance for the proposed Project to
maintain compliance with regulatory policies, GLLC mailed Project consultation letters, including a map of
the Project area, to all agencies known to have potential regulatory jurisdiction over the Project as shown in
Table 1.9-1. GLLC will continue to consult with the regulatory agencies to solicit input and to obtain data
germane to assessing potential environmental impacts. Correspondence with regulatory agencies regarding
the Project, including meeting information, is included in Appendix 1.A of this Resource Report 1.
1.11.2 Affected Landowners
There are no residences located within one-half mile of the Terminal. The names and addresses of all
affected landowners and towns, communities, and local, state and federal governments and agencies of the
Project facilities are included in Appendix 1.C (Volume II), filed pursuant to 380.12(c)(10) of the
Commissions regulations. As required, and in accordance with 18 CFR 157.6(d)(2), GLLC will send
formal written notification to these entities and individuals within three (3) business days following the date
the Commission issues a notice of application for the Project.
1.12 Non-Jurisdictional Facilities
The liquefaction facility will add approximately 200 MW of load to the local utility (Mississippi Power)
system. The existing LNG import terminal is served by a 23 kV distribution line. It is expected that new
high-voltage transmission lines will have to be installed to provide the power required by the Gulf LNG
Liquefaction Project.
Final plans have yet to be developed but it is expected that Mississippi Power will build a new substation
within the liquefaction facility. The new substation will be supplied by redundant transmission lines and
provide dedicated and redundant service to the liquefaction facility.
1.12.1 Four-Factor Test
Under NEPA, the FERC may need to consider the environmental impact of related non-jurisdictional
facilities that would be constructed upstream or downstream of the jurisdictional facilities for the purpose of
delivering, receiving, or using the proposed gas volumes. The extent of the Commissions analyses of non-
jurisdictional facilities depends on the Commissions determination of its and other federal agencies control
and responsibility over these facilities. Section 380.12(c)(2)(ii) of the Regulations sets forth four factors the
Commission will use to determine whether there is sufficient federal control and responsibility over a project
as a whole to warrant environmental analysis of project-related non-jurisdictional facilities. The factors are:
1. Whether or not the regulated activity comprises merely a link in a corridor type project (e.g., a
transportation or utility transmission project).
2. Whether there are aspects of the non-jurisdictional facility in the immediate vicinity of the regulated
activity which uniquely determine the location and configuration of the regulated activity.

1-19
3. The extent to which the entire project will be within the Commissions jurisdiction.
4. The extent of cumulative federal control and responsibility.
Application of the four-factor test does not support federal environmental review of the upgraded facilities
that the electric service provider will install to supply additional electric power to the Project site.
Conclusions of the four factor test are as follows:
With regard to the first factor, the jurisdictional facility is a link in a natural gas transportation project. The
modifications to the Terminal to install liquefaction and export facilities will enable LLC to export
approximately 10 MTPA of LNG.
With regard to the second factor, the proposed non-jurisdictional facilities will provide electricity to the
jurisdictional facility proposed in this application. The location and configuration of the jurisdictional facility
has not been uniquely influenced by an electric service providers non-jurisdictional facilities. The proposed
Project site in J ackson County, Mississippi is an existing certificated facility, and the proposed modifications
to the Terminal are not dictated by the electric transmission lines. Rather, the location and design of an
electric service providers non-jurisdictional facilities have been, and will continue to be, dictated by the
location of the jurisdictional Project facilities.
With regard to the third factor, installation of the electric power lines is regulated by state and local agencies
and an electric service provider must comply with applicable state environmental requirements. FERC does
not have authority over the permitting, licensing, funding, construction, or operation of the electric service
providers non-jurisdictional facilities. Therefore, this factor also weighs against extending the scope of the
FERCs environmental review to the non-jurisdictional facilities.
With regard to the fourth factor, federal control is determined by the amount of federal financing, assistance,
direction, regulation, or approval inherent in a project. Installation of the electrical facilities will be under
state and local jurisdiction. No federal financing or federally controlled lands are involved. Other federal
agencies (e.g., USFWS and USACE) are expected to have limited or no involvement in the approval of the
non-jurisdictional facilities to be constructed, owned, and operated by the electric service provider.
Therefore, cumulative federal control is minimal, and this factor does not warrant extending FERCs
environmental review to the non-jurisdictional facilities.
1.13 References
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC). 2013. Upland Erosion Control, Revegetation and
Maintenance Plan.
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC). 2013. Wetland and Waterbody Construction and
Mitigation Procedures.
The following Project engineering documents and industry standards also have been referenced in
preparation of this Resource Report 1:
1. NFPA 59A, Standard for the Production, Storage, and Handling of Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG).
2. ASCE 7-05, Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures.
3. American Concrete Institute ACI 318/318 R - Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete and
Commentary.
4. American Concrete Institute ACI 350/350R - Code Requirements for Environmental Engineering
Concrete Structures and Commentary.
5. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) Standard
Specifications for Highway Bridges.

1-20
6. American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC) Steel Construction Manual Allowable Stress Design
(ASD) and Load and Resistance Factor Design (LRFD).

Appendix 1.A
Regulatory Correspondence

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC)

1

A

n
u
m
b
e
r

o
f

t
h
e

p
e
r
m
i
t
s

d
e
s
c
r
i
b
e
d

p
r
o
v
i
d
e

a
g
e
n
c
i
e
s
,

t
h
e

p
u
b
l
i
c
,

a
n
d

o
t
h
e
r

s
t
a
k
e
h
o
l
d
e
r
s

t
h
e

o
p
p
o
r
t
u
n
i
t
y

t
o

r
e
v
i
e
w

a
n
d

c
o
m
m
e
n
t

o
n

t
h
e

p
r
o
j
e
c
t

(
e
.
g
.
,

F
E
R
C
s

N
E
P
A

p
r
o
c
e
s
s
,

C
O
E
s

s
e
c
t
i
o
n

1
0
/
4
0
4

p
e
r
m
i
t
,

e
t
c
.
)
.

M
a
j
o
r

P
e
r
m
i
t
s
,

A
p
p
r
o
v
a
l
s
,

a
n
d

C
o
n
s
u
l
t
a
t
i
o
n
s

f
o
r

t
h
e

L
N
G

C
l
e
a
n

E
n
e
r
g
y

P
r
o
j
e
c
t

A
g
e
n
c
y

P
e
r
m
i
t
/
A
p
p
r
o
v
a
l
/
C
o
n
s
u
l
t
a
t
i
o
n
s
1

A
g
e
n
c
y

A
c
t
i
o
n

F
E
D
E
R
A
L

F
e
d
e
r
a
l

E
n
e
r
g
y

R
e
g
u
l
a
t
o
r
y

C
o
m
m
i
s
s
i
o
n

(
F
E
R
C
)

A
u
t
h
o
r
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
s

u
n
d
e
r

s
e
c
t
i
o
n
s

3

a
n
d

7

o
f

t
h
e

N
a
t
i
o
n
a
l

G
a
s

A
c
t

R
e
q
u
e
s
t

t
o

I
n
i
t
i
a
t
e

N
E
P
A

P
r
e
f
i
l
i
n
g

f
i
l
e
d

w
i
t
h

F
E
R
C

1
2
/
5
/
2
0
1
2

A
d
v
i
s
o
r
y

C
o
u
n
c
i
l

o
n

H
i
s
t
o
r
i
c

P
r
e
s
e
r
v
a
t
i
o
n

N
a
t
i
o
n
a
l

E
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l

P
o
l
i
c
y

A
c
t

o
f

1
9
6
9

(
N
E
P
A
)

S
e
c
t
i
o
n

1
0
6

C
o
n
s
u
l
t
a
t
i
o
n
,

N
a
t
i
o
n
a
l

H
i
s
t
o
r
i
c

P
r
e
s
e
r
v
a
t
i
o
n

A
c
t

(
N
H
P
A
)

C
o
r
r
e
s
p
o
n
d
e
n
c
e

w
i
l
l

b
e

s
e
n
t

s
h
o
r
t
l
y

t
o

d
e
t
e
r
m
i
n
e

t
h
e

a
g
e
n
c
i
e
s

w
i
l
l
i
n
g
n
e
s
s

t
o

p
a
r
t
i
c
i
p
a
t
e

i
n

t
h
e

N
E
P
A

P
r
e
-
F
i
l
i
n
g

P
r
o
c
e
s
s

U
.
S
.

A
r
m
y

C
o
r
p
s

o
f

E
n
g
i
n
e
e
r
s

(
C
O
E
)

M
o
b
i
l
e

D
i
s
t
r
i
c
t

A
u
t
h
o
r
i
z
a
t
i
o
n

f
o
r

a
c
t
i
v
i
t
i
e
s

t
h
a
t

w
i
l
l

o
c
c
u
p
y
,

f
i
l
l
,

o
r

g
r
a
d
e

l
a
n
d

i
n

a

f
l
o
o
d
p
l
a
i
n
,

s
t
r
e
a
m
b
e
d
,

o
r

c
h
a
n
n
e
l

o
f

a

s
t
r
e
a
m

o
r

o
t
h
e
r

w
a
t
e
r
s

o
f

t
h
e

U
n
i
t
e
d

S
t
a
t
e
s

u
n
d
e
r

s
e
c
t
i
o
n

1
0

o
f

t
h
e

R
i
v
e
r
s

a
n
d

H
a
r
b
o
r
s

A
c
t

o
f

1
8
9
9

A
u
t
h
o
r
i
z
a
t
i
o
n

t
o

d
i
s
c
h
a
r
g
e

d
r
e
d
g
e
d

o
r

f
i
l
l

m
a
t
e
r
i
a
l

i
n
t
o

w
a
t
e
r
s

o
f

t
h
e

U
n
i
t
e
d

S
t
a
t
e
s

u
n
d
e
r

s
e
c
t
i
o
n

4
0
4

o
f

t
h
e

C
l
e
a
n

W
a
t
e
r

A
c
t

(
C
W
A
)

A
u
t
h
o
r
i
z
a
t
i
o
n

f
o
r

o
c
e
a
n

d
i
s
p
o
s
a
l

o
f

d
r
e
d
g
e
d

m
a
t
e
r
i
a
l

u
n
d
e
r

s
e
c
t
i
o
n

1
0
3

o
f

t
h
e

M
a
r
i
n
e

P
r
o
t
e
c
t
i
o
n
,

R
e
s
e
a
r
c
h
,

a
n
d

S
a
n
c
t
u
a
r
i
e
s

A
c
t

(
M
P
R
S
A
)

C
o
r
r
e
s
p
o
n
d
e
n
c
e

w
i
l
l

b
e

s
e
n
t

s
h
o
r
t
l
y

t
o

d
e
t
e
r
m
i
n
e

t
h
e

a
g
e
n
c
i
e
s

w
i
l
l
i
n
g
n
e
s
s

t
o

p
a
r
t
i
c
i
p
a
t
e

i
n

t
h
e

N
E
P
A

P
r
e
-
F
i
l
i
n
g

P
r
o
c
e
s
s

U
.
S
.

D
e
p
a
r
t
m
e
n
t

o
f

C
o
m
m
e
r
c
e

N
a
t
i
o
n
a
l

O
c
e
a
n
i
c

a
n
d

A
t
m
o
s
p
h
e
r
i
c

A
d
m
i
n
i
s
t
r
a
t
i
o
n
,

N
a
t
i
o
n
a
l

M
a
r
i
n
e

F
i
s
h
e
r
i
e
s

S
e
r
v
i
c
e

C
o
n
s
u
l
t
a
t
i
o
n

r
e
g
a
r
d
i
n
g

c
o
m
p
l
i
a
n
c
e

w
i
t
h

s
e
c
t
i
o
n

7

o
f

t
h
e

E
n
d
a
n
g
e
r
e
d

S
p
e
c
i
e
s

A
c
t
;

t
h
e

M
a
g
n
u
s
o
n
-
S
t
e
v
e
n
s

F
i
s
h
e
r
y

C
o
n
s
e
r
v
a
t
i
o
n

a
n
d

M
a
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t

A
c
t
;

a
n
d

t
h
e

M
a
r
i
n
e

M
a
m
m
a
l

P
r
o
t
e
c
t
i
o
n

A
c
t

C
o
r
r
e
s
p
o
n
d
e
n
c
e

w
i
l
l

b
e

s
e
n
t

s
h
o
r
t
l
y

t
o

d
e
t
e
r
m
i
n
e

t
h
e

a
g
e
n
c
i
e
s

w
i
l
l
i
n
g
n
e
s
s

t
o

p
a
r
t
i
c
i
p
a
t
e

i
n

t
h
e

N
E
P
A

P
r
e
-
F
i
l
i
n
g

P
r
o
c
e
s
s

U
.
S
.

D
e
p
a
r
t
m
e
n
t

o
f

t
h
e

I
n
t
e
r
i
o
r

F
i
s
h

a
n
d

W
i
l
d
l
i
f
e

S
e
r
v
i
c
e

C
o
n
s
u
l
t
a
t
i
o
n

r
e
g
a
r
d
i
n
g

c
o
m
p
l
i
a
n
c
e

w
i
t
h

s
e
c
t
i
o
n

7

o
f

t
h
e

E
n
d
a
n
g
e
r
e
d

S
p
e
c
i
e
s

A
c
t
,

t
h
e

M
i
g
r
a
t
o
r
y

B
i
r
d

T
r
e
a
t
y

A
c
t
,

a
n
d

t
h
e

F
i
s
h

a
n
d

W
i
l
d
l
i
f
e

C
o
o
r
d
i
n
a
t
i
o
n

A
c
t

C
o
r
r
e
s
p
o
n
d
e
n
c
e

w
i
l
l

b
e

s
e
n
t

s
h
o
r
t
l
y

t
o

d
e
t
e
r
m
i
n
e

t
h
e

a
g
e
n
c
i
e
s

w
i
l
l
i
n
g
n
e
s
s

t
o

p
a
r
t
i
c
i
p
a
t
e

i
n

t
h
e

N
E
P
A

P
r
e
-
F
i
l
i
n
g

P
r
o
c
e
s
s

U
.
S
.

E
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l

P
r
o
t
e
c
t
i
o
n

A
g
e
n
c
y

R
e
g
i
o
n

4

S
e
c
t
i
o
n

4
0
4

o
f

t
h
e

C
W
A

(
v
e
t
o

p
o
w
e
r

f
o
r

w
e
t
l
a
n
d

p
e
r
m
i
t
s

i
s
s
u
e
d

b
y

t
h
e

C
O
E
)

S
e
c
t
i
o
n

4
0
2
,

C
W
A
,

N
a
t
i
o
n
a
l

P
o
l
l
u
t
a
n
t

D
i
s
c
h
a
r
g
e

E
l
i
m
i
n
a
t
i
o
n

S
y
s
t
e
m

(
N
P
D
E
S
)

P
e
r
m
i
t

C
l
e
a
n

A
i
r

A
c
t

(
C
A
A
)

p
e
r
m
i
t
s

f
o
r

t
h
e

c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n

o
f

a

s
t
a
t
i
o
n
a
r
y

s
o
u
r
c
e

o
f

a
i
r

p
o
l
l
u
t
a
n
t

e
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
s

a
n
d

f
o
r

o
p
e
r
a
t
i
o
n

o
f

t
h
e

s
o
u
r
c
e

S
e
c
t
i
o
n

1
0
3

o
f

t
h
e

M
P
R
S
A

(
v
e
t
o

p
o
w
e
r

f
o
r

o
c
e
a
n

d
i
s
p
o
s
a
l

o
f

d
r
e
d
g
e
d

m
a
t
e
r
i
a
l

p
e
r
m
i
t
s

i
s
s
u
e
d

b
y

t
h
e

C
O
E
)

C
o
r
r
e
s
p
o
n
d
e
n
c
e

w
i
l
l

b
e

s
e
n
t

s
h
o
r
t
l
y

t
o

d
e
t
e
r
m
i
n
e

t
h
e

a
g
e
n
c
i
e
s

w
i
l
l
i
n
g
n
e
s
s

t
o

p
a
r
t
i
c
i
p
a
t
e

i
n

t
h
e

N
E
P
A

P
r
e
-
F
i
l
i
n
g

P
r
o
c
e
s
s

U
.
S
.

D
e
p
a
r
t
m
e
n
t

o
f

H
o
m
e
l
a
n
d

S
e
c
u
r
i
t
y

U
.
S
.

C
o
a
s
t

G
u
a
r
d

F
a
c
i
l
i
t
y

S
e
c
u
r
i
t
y

P
l
a
n

L
e
t
t
e
r

o
f

R
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
a
t
i
o
n

L
N
G

V
e
s
s
e
l

O
p
e
r
a
t
i
o
n

a
n
d

E
m
e
r
g
e
n
c
y

C
o
n
t
i
n
g
e
n
c
y

P
l
a
n

O
p
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
s

M
a
n
u
a
l

a
n
d

E
m
e
r
g
e
n
c
y

M
a
n
u
a
l

P
e
r
m
i
s
s
i
o
n

t
o

E
s
t
a
b
l
i
s
h

A
i
d
s

t
o

N
a
v
i
g
a
t
i
o
n

S
p
i
l
l

P
r
e
v
e
n
t
i
o
n

a
n
d

S
p
i
l
l

R
e
s
p
o
n
s
e

P
l
a
n

C
o
r
r
e
s
p
o
n
d
e
n
c
e

w
i
l
l

b
e

s
e
n
t

s
h
o
r
t
l
y

t
o

d
e
t
e
r
m
i
n
e

t
h
e

a
g
e
n
c
i
e
s

w
i
l
l
i
n
g
n
e
s
s

t
o

p
a
r
t
i
c
i
p
a
t
e

i
n

t
h
e

N
E
P
A

P
r
e
-
F
i
l
i
n
g

P
r
o
c
e
s
s

APPENDIX B
MAJOR PERMITTING TABLE
U
.
S
.

D
e
p
a
r
t
m
e
n
t

o
f

T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n

P
i
p
e
l
i
n
e

a
n
d

H
a
z
a
r
d
o
u
s

M
a
t
e
r
i
a
l
s

S
a
f
e
t
y

A
d
m
i
n
i
s
t
r
a
t
i
o
n

L
N
G

F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s

P
e
t
i
t
i
o
n

f
o
r

A
p
p
r
o
v
a
l

C
o
r
r
e
s
p
o
n
d
e
n
c
e

w
i
l
l

b
e

s
e
n
t

s
h
o
r
t
l
y

t
o

d
e
t
e
r
m
i
n
e

t
h
e

a
g
e
n
c
i
e
s

w
i
l
l
i
n
g
n
e
s
s

t
o

p
a
r
t
i
c
i
p
a
t
e

i
n

t
h
e

N
E
P
A

P
r
e
-
F
i
l
i
n
g

P
r
o
c
e
s
s

S
T
A
T
E

M
i
s
s
i
s
s
i
p
p
i

D
e
p
a
r
t
m
e
n
t

o
f

E
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l

Q
u
a
l
i
t
y

S
e
c
t
i
o
n

4
0
1

C
W
A
,

W
a
t
e
r

Q
u
a
l
i
t
y

C
e
r
t
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n

N
P
D
E
S

H
y
d
r
o
s
t
a
t
i
c

D
i
s
c
h
a
r
g
e

P
e
r
m
i
t

N
P
D
E
S

C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n

S
t
o
r
m
w
a
t
e
r

P
e
r
m
i
t

N
P
D
E
S

D
i
s
c
h
a
r
g
e

P
e
r
m
i
t

(
t
e
r
m
i
n
a
l

o
p
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
s
)

N
P
D
E
S

I
n
d
u
s
t
r
i
a
l

S
t
o
r
m
w
a
t
e
r

P
e
r
m
i
t

P
e
r
m
i
t

t
o

C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
/
P
e
r
m
i
t

t
o

O
p
e
r
a
t
e

(
T
i
t
l
e

V
,

C
A
A
)

C
o
r
r
e
s
p
o
n
d
e
n
c
e

w
i
l
l

b
e

s
e
n
t

s
h
o
r
t
l
y

t
o

d
e
t
e
r
m
i
n
e

t
h
e

a
g
e
n
c
i
e
s

w
i
l
l
i
n
g
n
e
s
s

t
o

p
a
r
t
i
c
i
p
a
t
e

i
n

t
h
e

N
E
P
A

P
r
e
-
F
i
l
i
n
g

P
r
o
c
e
s
s

M
i
s
s
i
s
s
i
p
p
i

D
e
p
a
r
t
m
e
n
t

o
f

M
a
r
i
n
e

C
o
n
s
i
d
e
r

c
o
n
s
i
s
t
e
n
c
y

w
i
t
h

C
Z
M
A
.

R
e
s
o
u
r
c
e
s

F
e
d
e
r
a
l

C
o
n
s
i
s
t
e
n
c
y

R
e
v
i
e
w

w
i
t
h

C
o
a
s
t
a
l

Z
o
n
e

M
a
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t

A
c
t

(
C
Z
M
A
)

p
r
o
g
r
a
m

p
o
l
i
c
i
e
s
.

J
o
i
n
t

w
e
t
l
a
n
d
s

p
e
r
m
i
t

w
i
t
h

t
h
e

C
O
E

C
o
r
r
e
s
p
o
n
d
e
n
c
e

w
i
l
l

b
e

s
e
n
t

s
h
o
r
t
l
y

t
o

d
e
t
e
r
m
i
n
e

t
h
e

a
g
e
n
c
i
e
s

w
i
l
l
i
n
g
n
e
s
s

t
o

p
a
r
t
i
c
i
p
a
t
e

i
n

t
h
e

N
E
P
A

P
r
e
-
F
i
l
i
n
g

P
r
o
c
e
s
s

M
i
s
s
i
s
s
i
p
p
i

D
e
p
a
r
t
m
e
n
t

o
f

A
r
c
h
i
v
e
s

a
n
d

H
i
s
t
o
r
y

S
e
c
t
i
o
n

1
0
6
,

N
H
P
A

C
o
r
r
e
s
p
o
n
d
e
n
c
e

w
i
l
l

b
e

s
e
n
t

s
h
o
r
t
l
y

t
o

d
e
t
e
r
m
i
n
e

t
h
e

a
g
e
n
c
i
e
s

w
i
l
l
i
n
g
n
e
s
s

t
o

p
a
r
t
i
c
i
p
a
t
e

i
n

t
h
e

N
E
P
A

P
r
e
-
F
i
l
i
n
g

P
r
o
c
e
s
s

M
i
s
s
i
s
s
i
p
p
i

M
u
s
e
u
m

o
f

N
a
t
u
r
a
l

S
c
i
e
n
c
e

N
a
t
u
r
a
l

H
e
r
i
t
a
g
e

P
r
o
g
r
a
m

C
o
n
s
u
l
t
a
t
i
o
n

r
e
g
a
r
d
i
n
g

s
t
a
t
e
-
l
i
s
t
e
d

t
h
r
e
a
t
e
n
e
d

a
n
d

e
n
d
a
n
g
e
r
e
d

s
p
e
c
i
e
s

C
o
r
r
e
s
p
o
n
d
e
n
c
e

w
i
l
l

b
e

s
e
n
t

s
h
o
r
t
l
y

t
o

d
e
t
e
r
m
i
n
e

t
h
e

a
g
e
n
c
i
e
s

w
i
l
l
i
n
g
n
e
s
s

t
o

p
a
r
t
i
c
i
p
a
t
e

i
n

t
h
e

N
E
P
A

P
r
e
-
F
i
l
i
n
g

P
r
o
c
e
s
s

M
i
s
s
i
s
s
i
p
p
i

D
e
p
a
r
t
m
e
n
t

o
f

T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n

R
o
a
d

r
i
g
h
t
-
o
f
-
w
a
y

p
e
r
m
i
t

C
o
r
r
e
s
p
o
n
d
e
n
c
e

w
i
l
l

b
e

s
e
n
t

s
h
o
r
t
l
y

t
o

d
e
t
e
r
m
i
n
e

t
h
e

a
g
e
n
c
i
e
s

w
i
l
l
i
n
g
n
e
s
s

t
o

p
a
r
t
i
c
i
p
a
t
e

i
n

t
h
e

N
E
P
A

P
r
e
-
F
i
l
i
n
g

P
r
o
c
e
s
s

L
O
C
A
L

J
a
c
k
s
o
n

C
o
u
n
t
y

P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g

D
e
p
a
r
t
m
e
n
t

J
a
c
k
s
o
n

C
o
u
n
t
y

P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g

D
e
p
a
r
t
m
e
n
t

Z
o
n
i
n
g

v
a
r
i
a
n
c
e

f
o
r

b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g

h
e
i
g
h
t

C
o
r
r
e
s
p
o
n
d
e
n
c
e

w
i
l
l

b
e

s
e
n
t

s
h
o
r
t
l
y

t
o

d
e
t
e
r
m
i
n
e

t
h
e

a
g
e
n
c
i
e
s

w
i
l
l
i
n
g
n
e
s
s

t
o

p
a
r
t
i
c
i
p
a
t
e

i
n

t
h
e

N
E
P
A

P
r
e
-
F
i
l
i
n
g

P
r
o
c
e
s
s

APPENDIX B
MAJOR PERMITTING TABLE
APPENDIX C

LOCAL AND STATE OFFICIALS

Jackson County Port Authority (Director) and Commissioners
Jackson County Supervisors
Mayor & Council City of Pascagoula
Mayor & Council City of Moss Point
Jackson County Economic Development Foundation Board
Michael Watson (State Senator)
Brice Wiggins (State Senator)
Manly Barton (State Rep)
Charles Busby (State Rep)
John Lundy (Capitol Resources) informational only

May 9, 2014

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
888 First Street, NE
Room 1A

Re: Supplemental Information to Original Request to Initiate
Commission NEPA Pre-Filing Process filed on December 5, 2012

Dear Ms. Bose:

On December 5, 2012, Gulf LNG Liquefaction Company, LLC
1
(GLLC) requested that
the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission) initiate a National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) pre-filing review (December 5 Request),
2

pursuant to Section 157.21 of the Commissions regulations,
3
of a proposed two-phased
liquefaction and export project (GLLC Liquefaction Project or the Project) that will
be integrated with Gulf LNG Energy, LLCs (GLE) existing liquefied natural gas
(LNG) terminal located in J ackson County, Mississippi near Pascagoula, Mississippi
(Terminal)
4
. On December 14, 2012, the Commission issued a letter stating that it will
consider the December 5 Request upon full compliance with the procedures outlined in the
Commissions regulations at 18 CFR 157.21. GLLC hereby files supplemental
information relating to the December 5 Request for review and written approval from the
Director of the Office of Energy Projects.
5

Addition of Gulf LNG Energy, LLC and Gulf LNG Pipeline, LLC

By this Supplement, GLE and Gulf LNG Pipeline, LLC (GLP) join GLLC (together
Companies) in requesting that the Commission initiate a NEPA pre-filing review of the
proposed Project. The Project will require modifications to the existing Gulf LNG
Terminal owned by GLE, including new or additional in-tank pumps, piping modifications
and valves, and control systems to provide for bi-directional operation and tie-ins to the
new facility. Additionally, GLP proposes modifications to meter stations and interconnects
in order for the Gulf LNG Pipeline to have bi-directional flow capability. Upon
completion of the Project, GLP will continue to be able to provide import and vaporization

1
GLLC is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Gulf LNG Holdings Group, LLC, which is held 50% by
Southern Gulf LNG Company, L.L.C., a wholly owned subsidiary of Kinder Morgan, Inc., 38%
directly and indirectly by GE Energy Financial Services, a unit of GE, and 12% indirectly by other
investors.
2
42 U.S.C. 4332 (2000).
3
18 C.F.R. 157.21 (2012).
4
See Gulf LNG Energy, LLC, 118 FERC 61,128 (2007).
5
The December 5 Request is attached hereto as Appendix A. Except as supplemented and updated
here, the information submitted in the December 5 Request is still applicable.
May 9, 2014
Page 2
terminaling services and retain its ability to deliver vaporized LNG to the existing pipeline
interconnections.

Completion of Commissions Regulations

In compliance with Section 157.21 of the Commissions regulations, Companies provide
the following supplemental information to the December 5 Request:

1. Companies met with the Office of Energy Projects Staff (Staff) on May 1, 2014,
for an initial consultation meeting.

2. Companies provided Staff with proposals from three prospective third-party
contractors on May 1, 2014.

3. See Appendix B for a letter by the U.S. Coast Guard from J anuary 17, 2013, stating
that the existing Letter of Recommendation and Waterway Suitability Assessment
(WSA) will remain valid since the proposed modifications for this Project do not
alter the Marine Transfer Area in a way that would result in an increased capacity
beyond the existing WSA.

Updates to the Project

Companies provide the following updates to the Project:

1. In accordance with Section 157.2(d)(1) of the Commissions Regulations, the
Companies have updated the anticipated key milestone dates for the Project have
been as follows:

Commence Front End Engineering Design April 2014
Approval of Pre-Filing Request May 2014
Submit Application to Commission
GLLC and GLE Liquefaction Project NGA Section 3
April 2015
NEPA Document Issued February 2016
Commission Order Issued April 2016
File Initial Implementation Plans May 2016
Initiate Construction J une 2016
Phase I In Service for GLLC Liquefaction Project 3
rd
Quarter 2019
Phase II In Service for GLLC Liquefaction Project 2
nd
Quarter 2020

2. In accordance with Section 157.21(d)(3) of the Commissions Regulations, GLP
has been added to the request to reflect that GLP proposes modifications to meter
stations and interconnects in order for the Gulf LNG Pipeline to have bi-directional
flow capability.

Companies are providing updated overview maps of the Project, which are attached
as Appendix C.

May 9, 2014
Page 3
4. Companies further state that the Project will entail the following equipment and site
modifications:

GLLC LIQUEFACTION FACILITIES
Two LNG trains to be installed in two phases. Each phase will consist of a
single LNG train with a nominal production capacity of up to 5 million tons
per annum (MTPA). Up to 10 MTPA nominal of LNG will be produced
from a natural gas feedstock rate of up to 1.5 billion standard cubic feet per
day (Bcf/d) serving multiple liquefaction and export customers.
The refrigeration compressors in each LNG train will utilize gas turbine
drivers.
Processing facilities include:
o Inlet Feed Gas Pre-treatment facility including;
Acid Gas Removal Unit and Solvent Regeneration
Dehydration and Mercury Removal Unit
Heavies Removal Unit
o Refrigeration and Liquefaction
o Boil Off Gas Compression
Utilities and support facilities include:
o Wet and Dry Flares
o New Marine Flare (existing heated vent stack will not be used)
o Acid Gas Thermal Oxidizer
o Refrigerant Storage
o Miscellaneous Storage (diesel, lube oil, chemical)
o Fuel Gas System
o Effluent & Wastewater Disposal
o Firewater Systems (existing firewater pumps and storage tanks will
be used)
o Compressed Air (plant and instrument air)
o Nitrogen System (based on liquid nitrogen)
o Utility water, potable water and water demineralization (water supply
from existing Industrial Water Supply Pipeline)
o Defrost Gas
o Buildings (use of existing administration, control, security, and
maintenance buildings will be considered)
o Marine Offloading Facility (MOF) seaward of the existing marine
berth

GLE EXISTING TERMINAL MODIFICATIONS
Tie-ins to existing facilities
Replacement of one or more of the in-tank LNG pumps to support reverse flow
required for loading of LNG carriers
Expansion and integration of electrical systems
Building modifications
Pre-filing request no longer includes plans for a third tank or additional LNG
dock facilities

May 9, 2014
Page 4

GULF LNG PIPELINE MODIFICATIONS
Modification to the meter stations with Gulfstream Pipeline Company and
Destin Pipeline Company
Modification to the interconnection with Transcontinental Gas Pipeline
Corporation / Florida Gas Transmission Company.

5. In accordance with Section 157.21(d)(5) of the Commissions Regulations, an
updated list of federal and state permitting agencies and the status of Companies
contact with these agencies is attached as Appendix D.

6. In accordance with Section 157.21(d)(6) of the Commissions Regulations, a list of
other persons and organizations who have been contacted about the project, is
attached as Appendix E.

following contractors have been engaged to assist with certain aspects of the
development and design:

Engineering Contractor Engagement

KBR Pre-FEED Contractor
MMI Engineering Owners Engineer
CH-IV International LNG Technical Consultant

Environmental Studies - CH2MHILL

8. In accordance with Section 157.21(d)(8) of the Commissions Regulations,
Companies provided Staff with proposals from three prospective third-party
contractors on May 1, 2014.

9. In accordance with Section 157.21(d)(11) of the Commissions Regulations, GLLC
has developed a website dedicated to the Project to provide updated Project
materials and information. The website address is
http://gulflng.kindermorgan.com.

10. In accordance with Section 157.21(d)(12) of the Commissions Regulations,
Companies have attached as Appendix B a letter from the U.S. Coast Guard from
J anuary 17, 2013, stating that the existing Letter of Recommendation and WSA
will remain valid since the proposed modifications for this Project do not alter the
Marine Transfer Area in a way that would result in an increased capacity beyond
the existing WSA.

May 9, 2014
Page 5

Companies look forward to working with the Commission's OEP Staff as well as the
various federal, state, and local agencies to ensure a thorough and timely environmental
review of the proposed Project. Based on the foregoing information, Companies
respectfully request that the Commission approve the use of its pre-filing process for the
Project by May 23, 2014. Should you have any questions about this request, please feel
free to contact the undersigned at (205) 325-3813.

Very truly yours,

GULF LNG LIQUEFACTION COMPANY, LLC
GULF LNG ENERGY, LLC
GULF LNG PIPELINE, LLC

/s/ Glenn A. Sheffield
Glenn A. Sheffield
Director, Regulatory

Enclosures

cc: Lauren ODonnell
Terry Turpin
Rich McGuire
Anthony J . Rana
Andrew Kohout

Appendix A
December 5 Request

Appendix A
Page 1

December 5, 2012

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
888 First Street, NE
Room 1A

Re: Gulf LNG Liquefaction Company, L.L.C.
Request to Initiate Commission NEPA Pre-Filing Process
GLLC Liquefaction Project
Docket No. PF13-___-000

Dear Ms. Bose:

Gulf LNG Liquefaction Company, LLC.
6
(GLLC), respectfully requests, pursuant to
Section 157.21 of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commissions (Commission)
regulations,
7
that the Commission initiate a National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
pre-filing review
8
of a proposed two-phased liquefaction and export project (GLLC
Liquefaction Project or the Project) that will be integrated with Gulf LNG Energy,
LLCs (Gulf LNG) existing liquefied natural gas (LNG) terminal located in J ackson
County, Mississippi near Pascagoula, Mississippi (Terminal)
9
. The GLLC Liquefaction
Project is being developed to liquefy supplies of domestic natural gas for export.

The Project will be constructed pursuant to Section 3 of the Natural Gas Act (NGA).
10

Pursuant to Section 3(e) of the NGA, the Commission has exclusive authority to approve
or deny an application for citing, construction, expansion or operation of an LNG terminal.

In compliance with the requirements for NEPA pre-filing requests, GLLC hereby provides
the following information for the proposed Project:

1. A description of the schedule desired for the GLLC Liquefaction Project
including the expected application filing date and the desired date for
Commission approval.

GLLC anticipates filing its formal application for the Project pursuant to Section 3
of the NGA no later than J anuary 2014, approximately twelve (12) months from the

6
GLLC is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Gulf LNG Holdings Group, LLC, which is held 50% by
Southern Gulf LNG Company, LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Kinder Morgan, Inc. and the
remaining 50% interest is held by Arc LNG Holdings, LLC (20%) and EFS LNG Holdings, LLC
(30%).
7
18 C.F.R. 157.21 (2012).
8
42 U.S.C. 4332 (2000).
9
See Gulf LNG Energy, LLC, 118 FERC 61,128 (2007).
10
15 U.S.C. 717b (2006).
Appendix A
Page 2

expected date of commencement of the pre-filing review process for the Project. In
the application, GLLC will request that the Commission issue an order authorizing
the citing, construction and operation of the Project on or before J anuary 2015.
GLLC anticipates requesting authorization for construction before the end of
J anuary 2015.

The anticipated key milestone dates for the Project are as follows:

Approval of Pre-Filing Request December 2012
Commence Front End Engineering Design April 2013
Submit Applications to Commission
GLLC Liquefaction Project NGA Sections 3
and 7; and

J anuary 2014
NEPA Document Issued October 2014
Commission Order Issued J anuary 2015
File Initial Implementation Plans J anuary 2015
Initiate Construction March 2015

September 2018
Phase I In Service for GLLC Liquefaction Project

March 2019
Phase II In Service for GLLC Liquefaction Project

2. For LNG terminal facilities, a description of the zoning and availability of the
proposed site and marine facility location.

Gulf LNG owns the Terminal situated on the 33-acre site and the proposed
facilities for the GLLC Liquefaction Project will be situated on an adjacent site of
approximately 50 acres to be leased by GLLC. The Terminal site is currently
zoned for heavy industrial uses. The Terminal currently imports LNG using a
single marine unloading dock facility situated near the Gulf of Mexico in J ackson
County, Mississippi, near Pascagoula, Mississippi. The export component of the
GLLC Liquefaction Project includes modifications to utilize the existing Gulf LNG
marine facilities and the construction of a second marine unloading dock facility.

3. For natural gas facilities other than LNG terminal facilities and related
jurisdictional natural gas facilities, an explanation of why the GLLC is
requesting to use the pre-filing process.

Not applicable.

Appendix A
Page 3

4. A detailed description of the project, including location maps and plot plans to
scale showing all major plant components that will serve as the initial
discussion point for stakeholder review.

The Project is proposed to be constructed in two phases pursuant to Section 3 of the
Natural Gas Act.

Scope
The scope of the Project will involve modifications and additions to the existing
Terminal that are necessary to allow it to liquefy natural gas delivered by pipeline,
store it in the existing and additional LNG storage tanks and load it into LNG vessels
for export to foreign countries. The Terminal will remain able to receive, store,
regasify and deliver natural gas as originally constructed, thereby making the
Terminal bi-directional.

Capacity
Two LNG trains will be installed in two phases. Each phase will consist of a single
LNG train with a nominal production capacity of up to 5 MTPA. Up to 10.5
million tons per annum (MTPA) of LNG will be produced from a natural gas
feedstock rate of up to 1.5 billion standard cubic feet per day (Bcf/d) serving
multiple liquefaction and export customers.

Compressor Driver
The refrigeration compressors in each LNG train will utilize gas turbine drivers.
General Electric LM-6000 PF gas turbines with DLE combustion or equivalent are
expected.

Facilities
Since the feed gas will be pipeline quality natural gas, no provisions are expected to
be made to handle inlet condensate.

Based on the expected range of feed gas compositions, there are no hydrocarbon
constituents in the feed gas that cannot be included in the LNG product or that will
freeze (solidify) in the liquefaction facilities. Therefore, a Heavies Removal Unit is
not expected to be required. The relatively low level of nitrogen in the feed gas also
indicates that any excess nitrogen that does not remain in the LNG product can be
rejected into the plant fuel gas, and a cryogenic Nitrogen Removal Unit is not
expected to be required.

The existing plant back-up gas turbine generators and essential generator will be
supplemented with new essential generation capacity used to provide stand- by
power for the new liquefaction facilities.

Appendix A
Page 4

Processing facilities include:

Inlet Feed Gas Heater (including reconfiguration of the existing gas meters to
flow in reverse direction to the LNG facilities)
Acid Gas Removal Unit (AGRU) and Solvent Regeneration
Gas Dehydration and Mercury Removal Unit
Refrigeration and Liquefaction (excluding Heavies Removal)
LNG Storage: Two existing storage tanks and a third new LNG tank will be
included
Boil Off Gas Compression

Utilities and support facilities include:

LNG loading: Existing berth and loading arms will be used and supplemented
with a second berth and loading arms.
Wet and Dry Flares
New Marine Flare (existing heated vent stack will not be used)
Acid Gas Incinerator/Thermal Oxidizer
Refrigerant Storage
Miscellaneous Storage (diesel, lube oil, chemical, if required)
Fuel Gas System
Effluent & Wastewater Disposal
Firewater Systems (existing firewater pumps and storage tanks will be used)
Heating Medium System (using waste heat recovery)
Compressed Air (plant and instrument air)
Nitrogen System (based on liquid nitrogen)
Utility water, potable water and water demineralization (water supply from
existing Industrial Water Supply Pipeline)
Defrost Gas
Buildings (use of existing administration, control, security, and maintenance
buildings will be considered)

An overview map that includes both Phase I and Phase II of the proposed
GLLC Liquefaction Project is included herein as Appendix A.

5. A list of the relevant federal and state agencies in the project area with
permitting requirements. For LNG terminal facilities, the list shall identify
the agency designated by the governor of the state in which the Project will be
located to consult with the Commission regarding state and local safety
considerations. The filing shall include a statement indicating

(i) That those agencies are aware of the GLLCs intention to use the
pre-filing process (including contact names and telephone
numbers);
Appendix A
Page 5

(ii) Whether the agencies have agreed to participate in the process;
(iii) How the GLLC have accounted for agency schedules for issuance of
federal authorizations; and
(iv) When the GLLC propose to file with those agencies for their
respective permits or other authorizations.

Appendix C herein contains a list of federal and state permitting requirements for
the proposed GLLC Liquefaction Project. The responsible agencies for the federal
and state permitting requirements will be made aware of the intent to file an
application with the Commission and to use the Commission's pre-filing process.
GLLC will file any agency requests and responses with the Commission during the
application process. GLLC believe that all federal and state environmental
permitting requirements can be completed concurrent with the schedule set by the
Commission pursuant to Section 157.9 of the Commissions regulations.
11

6. A list and description of the interest of other persons and organizations who
have been contacted about the project (including contact names and telephone
numbers).

GLLC has initiated its public outreach program and will continue to contact various
interested persons and organizations prior to conducting an open house and/or other
public outreach efforts. Appendix C herein contains a list of federal, state and local
government officials for the proposed GLLC Liquefaction Project. GLLC will
contact federal, state, and local government officials, and other interested parties or
organizations that have been contacted about the Project, in addition to the
environmental agencies to whom consultation letters are being sent (Appendix B).

7. A description of what work has already been done, e.g., contacting
stakeholders, agency consultations, project engineering, route planning,
environmental and engineering contractor engagement, environmental
surveys/studies, and open houses. This description shall also include the
identification of the environmental and engineering firms and subcontractors
under contract to develop the project.

Project Work Already Done or Continuing:

Stakeholders: See Items 5 and 6 above.

Agency Consultations: See Items 5 and 6 above.

Engineering:

GLLC is preparing the engineering and design plans for the
respective components of the GLLC Liquefaction Project.

11
18 C.F.R. 157.9 (2012).
Appendix A
Page 6

Engineering Contractor Engagement: At this time the following contractors have
been engaged to assist with certain aspects of the development and design:

Bechtel Oil, Gas, and Chemicals, Inc.

Environmental Studies:

Desktop research of publicly available information for the Terminal site has
been performed for each of the required Resource Reports. Field studies are
being scheduled.

Public Outreach and Open House Meetings:

Discussions have taken place with local, state and federal officials regarding
the proposed GLLC Liquefaction Project and will continue throughout
development, construction and operation of the proposed facilities
(Appendix C). An Open House will be scheduled in coordination with
Commission Staff.

8. For LNG terminal projects, proposals for at least three prospective third-
party contractors from which Commission staff may make a selection to assist
in the preparation of the requisite NEPA document.

GLLC plans to solicit proposals for prospective third-party contractors to assist
Commission Staff in the preparation of a NEPA document with a request for
response by J anuary 10, 2013. GLLC will submit three contractor proposals along
with GLLCs evaluation to the Commission for its consideration under separate
cover.

9. For natural gas facilities other than LNG terminal facilities and related
jurisdictional natural gas facilities, proposals for at least three prospective
third-party contractors from which Commission staff may make a selection to
assist in the preparation of the requisite NEPA document, or a proposal for
the submission of an applicant-prepared draft Environmental Assessment as
determined during the initial consultation described in paragraph (c) of this
section.

Not applicable.

10. Acknowledgement that a complete Environmental Report and complete
application are required at the time of filing.

GLLC hereby acknowledges that complete Environmental Reports and application
under Section 3 are required at the time of filing applications with the Commission.

Appendix A
Page 7

11. A description of a Public Participation Plan which identifies specific tools and
actions to facilitate stakeholder communications and public information,
including a project website and a single point of contact. This plan shall also
describe how the applicant intends to respond to requests for information
from federal and state permitting agencies, including, if applicable, the
governors designated agency for consultation regarding state and local safety
considerations with respect to LNG facilities

GLLC is committed to stakeholder communications and effective public outreach
on the Project. GLLC will develop a Public Participation Plan that will include the
following methods of communication with stakeholders:

A website dedicated to the Project to provide updated Project
materials and information.

Scheduling of open houses for the GLLC Liquefaction Project to
share and gather information. The final location and dates will be
determined in consultation with Commission Staff.

GLLC will contact stakeholders, either in person, by phone, or by
email and/or letter correspondence throughout the Project, as
appropriate. As appropriate, GLLC will endeavor to make direct
contact in response to GLLC requests and inquiries from
stakeholders.

The single point of contact for the Project will be

Glenn A. Sheffield
Director - Regulatory
Gulf LNG Liquefaction Company, L.L.C.
569 Brookwood Village, Suite 749
Birmingham, Alabama 35209
(205) 325-3813
glenn_sheffield@kindermorgan.com

12. Certification that a Letter of Intent and Preliminary WSA have been
submitted to the U.S. Coast Guard or, for modifications to an existing or
approved LNG terminal, that the U.S. Coast Guard did not require such
information.

GLLC will consult with the U.S. Coast Guard with respect to the GLLC
Liquefaction Project to obtain a letter from the U.S. Coast Guard stating that the
proposed modifications would not alter the Marine Transfer Area in a way that
would result in an increased capacity beyond the existing Waterway Suitability
Assessment. Therefore, GLLC does not believe that it will be required to submit a
new Letter of Intent, or Waterway Suitability Report.

Appendix A
Page 8

GLLC looks forward to working with the Commission's OEP Staff as well as the various
federal, state, and local agencies to ensure a thorough and timely environmental review of
the proposed Project. Based on the foregoing information, GLLC respectfully requests
that the Commission approve the use of its pre-filing process for the Project by December
17, 2012. Should you have any questions about this request, please feel free to contact the
undersigned at (205) 325-3813.

Very truly yours,

GULF LNG LIQUEFACTION COMPANY, L.L.C.

_______________________________
Glenn A. Sheffield
Director, Regulatory

Enclosures

cc: Lauren ODonnell
Terry Turpin
Rich McGuire

Appendix B
US Coast Guard Letter

Appendix C
Overview Maps

Fi gure 1-1
Proj ect Overview
Gulf Liquefaction Project
Gulf LNG Energy, LLC.
Jackson County, Mississippi
R:\GIS\SCO\GulfLNGLiquefactionCompany\MapFiles\Project_Overview.mxd cvonfreeden 4/29/2014 10:21:07 AM
PROJ ECT LOCATION
Notes:
1. Sources: Esri, DeLorme, NAVTEQ, USGS,
Intermap, iPC, NRCAN, Esri J apan, METI,
Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri (Thailand),
TomTom, 2013
2. Sources: Esri, TomTom, Department of Commerce,
Census Bureau, U.S. Department of
Gul fstream Meter Stati on
Transco / FGT Interconnect Destin Meter Stati on
0 1 0.5
Miles
Legend
Transco / FGT Interconnect
Destin Meter Station
Gulfstream Meter Station
Existing Gulf LNG Pipeline
Proposed Project Boundary
Exhibit C - Page 1
Figure 1-2
Project Facilities
R:\GIS\SCO\GulfLNGLiquefactionCompany\MapFiles\Project_Facilities.mxd aomalley 4/29/2014 1:04:34 PM
PROJECT LOCATION
Notes:
Intermap, iPC, NRCAN, Esri Japan, METI,
TomTom, 2013
South Marsh Mitigation Area
North Marsh Mitigation Area
0 800 400
Feet
$
Legend
Marsh Mitigation Area
Existing Terminal (Approx. 32.7 Acres)
Existing Terminal Access Road
Proposed Marine Offloading
Facility Locations, TBD (temporary)
(Approx. 142.5 Acres)
Appendix C - Page 2

Appendix D
Federal and State Agencies with Permitting Requirements
for the Project
ExhibitD
Page1
APPENDIX D.
PERMITS, APPROVALS, AND CERTIFICATIONS REQUIRED FOR THE CONSTRUCTION, OPERATION, AND
Federal
Authorization Under
Section 3 of the Natural
Gas Act

Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission
(FERC)

Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
888 First Street, N.E.
Room 1A
Washington, D.C. 20426
5/1/2014 - Meeting with FERC
Staff to introduce GLLC Project.
---
Authorization to Import
and Export Natural Gas,
including LNG
United States
Department of Energy
Larine A. Moore
U.S. Department of Energy
1000 Independence Ave., SW
202-586-9478
Free Trade Agreement (FTA) -
GLLC has received authorization
to export LNG to FTA countries.
Non-FTA GLLC applied for
authorization to export LNG to
non-FTA countries on 8/31/2012

FTA FE Docket No. 12-47-LNG, GLLC
has received authorization to export LNG
to FTA countries
Approval pending

Waterway Suitability
Assessment
United States Coast
Guard

Duke Walker, Captain of the Port
Mobile Sector - Waterways
Management Division
1500 5th Street, Brookley Complex
Mobile, Alabama 36615-1300
251-441-5940

Scott Muller Commander
(251) 441-5284
12/11/2012 - GLLC submitted a
letter to the U.S. Coast Guard
requesting a determination that
this Project would not require a
new Letter of Recommendation
(LOR) or a new Waterway
Suitability Assessment (WSA).
1/17/2013 - U.S. Coast Guard issued a
letter stating that the existing LOR and
WSA would remain valid and not require
revisions based on GLLCs statement that
the proposed modifications in this Project
would not alter the Marine Transfer Area
in a way that would result in an increased
capacity beyond the existing Waterway
Suitability Assessment.
4/29/2014 contacted Scott Muller as part
of pre-filing outreach
ExhibitD
Page2
APPENDIX D.
Safety and Security
Review
U.S. Department of
Transportation
(DOT), Pipeline and
Hazardous Materials
(PHMSA)
Ms. Melanie Barber
Emergency Support and Response
Officer
Office of Pipeline Safety, PHMSA
1200 New J ersey Avenue, SE

M. Buddy Secor, J r. PE
General Engineer
Engineering and Research Division
PHP-80
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
1200 New J ersey Avenue, SE, E22-
327
(202) 493-0452 Desk
(202) 754-2594 Cell
buddy.secor@dot.gov

5/1/2014 Received email message from
M.Buddy Secor, J r. that Ms. Barber had
retired and that he was helping to
coordinate LNG applications at PHMSA.
5/8/2014 Left message with M. Buddy
Secor, J r. to follow up with 4/18/14
Construction Within a
Floodplain
Federal Emergency
Management Agency
(FEMA), Region IV
Ms. Susan Wilson
Federal Emergency Management
Agency
Atlanta, GA 30341
770-220-5200
5/8/2014 Left message with Susan
Wilson to follow up with 4/18/2014
ExhibitD
Page3
APPENDIX D.
Clean Water Act,
Section 404; Rivers and
Harbors Act, Section 10
Section 103 of the
Marine Protection,
Research and
Sanctuaries Act
(MPRSA)
U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (USACE),
Mobile District
Munther Sahawneh
Mobile District
109 St. J oseph Street
Mobile, AL 36602
251-690-2658

Allison Monroe
(251) 690-3228

Colonel J on Chytka
(251) 690-2512

Peter Taylor - Deputy District
Engineer
(251) 690-2513

J ay Smitherman - Chief, Civil Works
Branch
(251) 694-3701

filing outreach
filing outreach

filing outreach

filing outreach
5/8/2014 contacted to follow up with
4/18/2014 correspondence letter. Mr.
Sahawneh or a representative from his
office will be involved in the pre-filing
process and plans to attend scoping
meetings.

Section 7 Consultation
(ESA), Marine Mammal
Protection Act,
MagnusonStevens
Fishery Conservation
and Management Act
(MSFCMA)
National Oceanic and
Atmospheric
Administration
(NOAA)
National Marine
Fisheries Service
(NMFS)
Ryan Hendron
NOAA
263 13
th
Avenue South
727-551-5610

Mark Thompson
NOAA's National Marine Fisheries
Service
3500 Delwood Beach Road
Panama City, FL 32408
850-234-5061

5/8/2014 Left message with Ryan
Hendron to follow up with 4/18/2014

5/8/2014 Left message with Mark
Thompson to follow up with 4/18/2014
ExhibitD
Page4
APPENDIX D.
Endangered Species Act
(ESA) Section 7
Consultation
U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service (USFWS)
Paul Necaise
J ackson Ecological Services Field
Office
6578 Dogwood View Parkway,
Suite A
J ackson, MS 39213
601-965-4900 office
228 493-6631 cell
5/8/2014 contacted Paul Necaise to
letter. Mr. Necaise will be involved in the
pre-filing process and plans to attend
scoping meetings, if available.

Mississippi
National Historic
Preservation Act
(NHPA), Section 106
Consultation
of Archives and History
(MDAH)
J im Woodrick
Division Director
Mississippi Department of Archives
and History
J ackson, MS 39201
601-576-6908
5/8/2014 Left message with J im
Woodrick to follow up with 4/18/2014
NHPA, Section 106
Consultation
Eastern Band of
Cherokee Indians
P.O. Box 455
Quall Boundary
Cherokee, NC 28719
828-497-7000

NHPA, Section 106
Consultation
Mississippi Band of
Choctaw Indians
Mr. Kenneth H. Carleton
Tribal Historic Preservation
Officer/Archaeologist
101 Industrial Road
Choctaw, MS 39350
Phone: (601) 650-7316

Listed Species
Consultation
Mississippi Natural
Science Museum
(MNSM)
Andy Sanderson
Mississippi Natural Science Museum
J ackson, MS 39202
601-576-6000
5/8/2014 Left message with Andy
Sanderson to follow up with 4/18/2014
ExhibitD
Page5
APPENDIX D.
CWA, Section 401
State Water Quality
Determination Joint
Review for Coastal
Wetlands

of Marine Resources
(MDMR)
Willa Brantley
Coordinator
Mississippi Department of Marine
Resources
1141 Bayview Ave.
Biloxi, MS 39532
228-374-5000
5/8/2014 Left message with Willa
Brantley to follow up with 4/18/14
Coastal Zone
Management
Consistency
Determination
MDMR
Willa Brantley
Coordinator
Mississippi Department of Marine
Resources
1141 Bayview Ave.
Biloxi, MS 39532
228-374-5000
5/8/2014 Left message with Willa
Brantley to follow up with 4/18/2014
Clean Air Act, Air
Pollution Permit

of Environmental
Quality (MDEQ)
Bryan Collins
Branch Chief of Energy and
Transportation
MDEQ
515 Amite Street
J ackson, MS 39201
601-961-5239

5/8/2014 contacted Bryan Collins to

letter. Mr. Collins will be involved in the
pre-filing process and plans to attend
scoping meetings.
Section 401 Water
Quality Certification
of Environmental
Quality (MDEQ)
Florance Bass
MDEQ
J ackson, MS 39201
601-961-5614

5/8/2014 Left message with Florance
Bass to follow up with 4/18/2014
Local
Land Lease J ackson County Port
Authority (Director)
and Commission
Mark McAndrews
Week of 4/21/2014

Appendix E
Outreach Contacts
Federal, State, and Local Government Officials
Interested Parties and Organizations
Exhibit E
DateofContact ContactName PhoneNumber Purpose
1 JacksonCountyPortAuthorityandCommission 4/21/14 MarkMcAndrews (228)7624041 Prefilingoutreach
5/1/2014ExecutiveSessionMeeting* MarkMcAndrews (228)7624041 TaxAbatementandPrefilingoutreach
5/1/2014ExecutiveSessionMeeting* WallaceEasleyCommissioner (228)8752532 TaxAbatementandPrefilingoutreach
5/1/2014ExecutiveSessionMeeting* RonaldRobinsonCommissioner (228)2170581 TaxAbatementandPrefilingoutreach
5/1/2014ExecutiveSessionMeeting* JimmyColmerCommissionand
CounseltoJCEDF
(228)7628021 TaxAbatementandPrefilingoutreach
2 CaptainofthePortUSCGSectorMobile 4/29/14 ScottMullerCommander (251)4415284 Prefilingoutreach
3 CorpsofEngineers(adjoiningdredgedisposalrights
onthepropertywewillhavetoworkoutthelease
withthePortforproject)
4/21/14 AllisonMonroe (251)6903228 Prefilingoutreach
4/28/14 ColonelJonChytka (251)6902512 Prefilingoutreach
4/28/14 PeterTaylorDeputyDistrict
Engineer
(251)6902513 Prefilingoutreach
4/28/14 JaySmithermanChief,CivilWorks
Branch
(251)6943701 Prefilingoutreach
4 ChevronRefinery 4/24/14 AlanSudduth (228)9384548 Prefilingoutreach
4/24/14 LouisG.Henry (228)9384265 Prefilingoutreach
5 BPAmerica 4/24/14 RichardRose (228)6961101 Prefilingoutreach
6 JacksonCountySupervisors 5/1/2014ExecutiveSessionMeeting* MikeMagumImmediatePast,Pres (228)7627641 TaxAbatementandPrefilingoutreach
5/1/2014ExecutiveSessionMeeting* TroyRossPresident (228)7693457 TaxAbatementandPrefilingoutreach
5/1/2014ExecutiveSessionMeeting* MeltonHarrisDistrict2 (228)7693170 TaxAbatementandPrefilingoutreach
5/1/2014ExecutiveSessionMeeting* BarryCumbestDistrict1 (228)7693403 TaxAbatementandPrefilingoutreach
5/1/2014ExecutiveSessionMeeting* JohnMcKayDistrict5 (228)7693378 TaxAbatementandPrefilingoutreach
7 JacksonCountyEconomicDevelopmentFoundation
Board
5/1/2014ExecutiveSessionMeeting* GeorgeFreelandExecutiveDir (228)7696263 TaxAbatementandPrefilingoutreach
5/1/2014ExecutiveSessionMeeting* GregCroninChairman (228)2733900 TaxAbatementandPrefilingoutreach
5/1/2014ExecutiveSessionMeeting* JerrySt.PeViceChairman (228)6960651 TaxAbatementandPrefilingoutreach
5/1/2014ExecutiveSessionMeeting* RoyceCumbestSec/Treas (228)9341230 TaxAbatementandPrefilingoutreach
5/1/2014ExecutiveSessionMeeting* BrianCuccias (228)9351606 TaxAbatementandPrefilingoutreach
5/1/2014ExecutiveSessionMeeting* MorrisStrickland (228)8726272 TaxAbatementandPrefilingoutreach
5/1/2014ExecutiveSessionMeeting* DenKnecht (228)6235789 TaxAbatementandPrefilingoutreach
5/1/2014ExecutiveSessionMeeting* FredMoran (228)8755464 TaxAbatementandPrefilingoutreach
5/1/2014ExecutiveSessionMeeting* JimEstabrook (228)7622641 TaxAbatementandPrefilingoutreach
8 Mayor&CityCouncilCityofPascagoula 5/1/2014InformationalMeeting** JimBlevinsMayor (228)7621020 TaxAbatementandPrefilingoutreach
5/1/2014InformationalMeeting** ScottTiptonCityCouncil (228)7621020 TaxAbatementandPrefilingoutreach
5/1/2014InformationalMeeting** FreddyJacksonCityCouncil (228)7621020 TaxAbatementandPrefilingoutreach
5/1/2014InformationalMeeting** BurtonHillCityCouncil (228)7621020 TaxAbatementandPrefilingoutreach
5/1/2014InformationalMeeting** BrendaSimpkinsCityCouncil (228)7621020 TaxAbatementandPrefilingoutreach
5/1/2014InformationalMeeting** DavidTadlockCityCouncil (228)7621020 TaxAbatementandPrefilingoutreach
5/1/2014InformationalMeeting** LarryTaylorCityCouncil (228)7621020 TaxAbatementandPrefilingoutreach
5/1/2014InformationalMeeting** EddieWilliamsCityAttorney (228)7621020 TaxAbatementandPrefilingoutreach
5/1/2014ExecutiveSessionMeeting* JimBlevinsMayor (228)7621020 TaxAbatementandPrefilingoutreach
5/1/2014ExecutiveSessionMeeting* BrendaSimpkinsCityCouncil (228)7621020 TaxAbatementandPrefilingoutreach
9 Mayor&CouncilCityofMossPoint 5/1/2014ExecutiveSessionMeeting* BillyBroomfieldMayor (228)4750300ext9 TaxAbatementandPrefilingoutreach
10 MayorofGulfport
11 MayorofGautier 5/1/2014ExecutiveSessionMeeting* GordonGollottMayor (228)4978000 TaxAbatementandPrefilingoutreach
12 MayorofOceanSprings 5/1/2014ExecutiveSessionMeeting* ConnieMoranMayor (228)8756722 TaxAbatementandPrefilingoutreach
13 GulfCoastBusinessCouncilChairJackNorris
14 MississippiEnergyInstitutePatrickSullivan
15 MississippiDevelopmentAuthorityPhillip weekofApril21,2014 BrentChristensen (601)3593449 SupportfromMDAforProject
16 MichaelWatson(StateSenator)
17 BriceWiggins(StateSenator)
18 ManlyBarton(StateRep)
19 CharlesBusby(StateRep)
20 MississippiGovernor
21 MississippiLtGovernor
22 MississippiSpeakerofHouse
23 Governor'sOffice ChrisChampion (601)5762901
24 StaffofThadCochran(USSenator)
25 StaffofRogerWicker(USSenator) 4/10/14 BevinWilkinson (202)2246253 ResponsetoinquiryfromSenatorWicker's
Office
4/17/14 BevinWilkinson (202)2246253 ResponsetoinquiryfromSenatorWicker's
Office
26 StaffofCongressmanStevenPalazzo4
th
DistrictUS
Representative
* MembersoftheJacksonCountyEconomicDevelopmentFoundationBoardofDirectorswhowereinvitedtoExecutiveSessionMeeting
** MembersofthePascagoulaCityCouncilwhowereinvitedtoInformationalMeeting
Local
State
Federal
GulfLiquefactionOutreachList
FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20426

OFFICE OF ENERGY PROJECTS In Reply Refer To:
OEP/DG2E/Gas 1
Gulf LNG Liquefaction
Company, LLC
May 21, 2014
Mr. Glenn A. Sheffield
Director Regulatory
569 Brookwood Village, Suite 749
Birmingham, Alabama 35209

Re: Approval to Initiate the Commissions Pre-Filing Process for the
GLLC Liquefaction Project

Dear Mr. Sheffield:

Thank you for your May 9, 2014 letter providing supplemental information
to Gulf LNG Liquefaction Company, LLCs (GLLC) original December 5, 2012
pre-filing request for the planned GLLC Liquefaction Project. We believe that
beginning review of this proposal prior to the receipt of your application will
greatly improve our ability to identify issues early and address them in our
environmental document.

On December 14, 2012, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
(FERC or Commission) issued a letter stating that it would consider GLLCs pre-
filing request upon full compliance with the procedures outlined in the
Commissions regulations at 18 CFR 157.21. We have determined that GLLC has
complied with those procedures and the pre-filing review process may begin.

As stated in your May 9, 2014 letter to the Commission, GLLC plans to
construct liquefaction facilities (LNG trains, and processing and support facilities)
in order to export LNG from its existing Gulf LNG Import facility located in the
Port of Pascagoula, Jackson County, Mississippi. GLLC also plans to make
modifications to existing terminal and pipeline facilities to accommodate bi-
directional flow of natural gas. No new pipeline looping or additional LNG
storage is planned for the project. Up to 10.5 million tons per annum of LNG
would be produced from a natural gas feedstock rate of up to 1.5 billion standard
cubic feet per day, serving multiple liquefaction and export customers.

Your letter states that GLLC intends to file an application in April 2015.
When GLLC files its application with the Commission, we will evaluate the
progress made during the pre-filing process, based in part on our success in
resolving the issues raised during scoping. Once we determine that your
application is ready for processing, we will establish a schedule for completion of
the environmental document and for the issuance of all other federal
authorizations.

My staff has reviewed the third-party contractor proposals and has selected
Cardno ENTRIX to work under the direct supervision and control of the
Commission staff in preparing the National Environmental Policy Act
documentation. I request that you proceed with executing a contract with Cardno
Entrix so work may begin as soon as possible.

If you have any questions, please contact the Office of Energy Projects
Environmental Project Manager for your project, Anthony J. Rana at (202) 502-
8224.

Sincerely,

Jeff C. Wright
Director
Office of Energy Projects

cc: Public File, Docket No. PF13-4-000
1
Ripley, Julia/ATL
From: Thomas, David/ATL
Sent: Thursday, J une 12, 2014 9:37 AM
To: Ripley, J ulia/ATL
Subject: FW: Cooperating agency
Categories: Gulf LNG
OriginalMessage
From:McKellar,CharlesT(Tim)[mailto:Tim_McKellar@KinderMorgan.com]
Sent:Thursday,June12,20149:23AM
To:Thomas,David/ATL;Susemihl,Robyn/ATL
Cc:Hardy,TinaS
Subject:Fwd:Cooperatingagency
DavepleaseseeemailfromTonystatingthattheDOEwillbeacooperatingagency.
Thanks,
TM
SentfrommyiPhone
Beginforwardedmessage:
From:"Hardy,TinaS"<Tina_Hardy@kindermorgan.com<mailto:Tina_Hardy@kindermorgan.com>>
Date:June12,2014,8:05:11AMCDT
To:"McKellar,CharlesT(Tim)"<Tim_McKellar@KinderMorgan.com<mailto:Tim_McKellar@KinderMorgan.com>>
Subject:RE:Cooperatingagency
Whatdowedowiththisinformation?ShouldIforwardittoDaveandRobynfortheRR1table?
Tina
TinaHardy
SouthernNaturalGasCompany
RatesandRegulatory
205.325.3668
205.325.3787(fax)
205.718.1502(cell)
From:AnthonyRana[mailto:anthony.rana@ferc.gov]
Sent:Thursday,June12,20146:42AM
To:McKellar,CharlesT(Tim);WilliamStaeger;Hardy,TinaS;AndrewKohout
Subject:Cooperatingagency
Goodmorning:IreceivedaphonecallonFridayoflastweekfromLisaTracyoftheDOE:Shehasrequestedcooperating
statusfortheDOEandrequeststhatsheparticipateinallfutureconferencecallsandcommunicationsontheProject.
LisawillpreparealettertotheCommissionrequestingcooperatingstatus.PleaseseeLisa'scontactdetailsbelow:
2
LisaC.Tracy
Phone:2025864523
Routing:FE34.2
Building:FORS
Location:WASHINGTONDC
Title:NATURALGASANALYST
InternetAddress:"lisa.tracy@hq.doe.gov<mailto:%22lisa.tracy@hq.doe.gov%22>
AnthonyJ.Rana
Geologist/Hydrogeologist
OfficeofEnergyProjects
GasBranch1,6J03
888FirstStreet,NE
Washington,DC20426

U.S. Coast Guard (USCG)

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS)
CH2M HILL
6600 Peachtree Dunwoody Road
Building 400 Suite 600
Atlanta, GA 30328
Tel 770.604.9095
Fax 770.604.9183

April 18, 2014

Paul Necaise
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Jackson Ecological Services Field Office
6578 Dogwood View Parkway, Suite A
Jackson, Mississippi 39213

Subject: Gulf LNG Liquefaction Company, LLC

Dear Mr. Necaise:
Gulf LNG Liquefaction Company, LLC (GLLC), an affiliate of Gulf LNG Energy, LLC
(GLE) and Gulf LNG Pipeline, LLC, intends to add liquefaction and export capabilities to
GLEs existing liquefied natural gas (LNG) import terminal located near the City of
Pascagoula in Jackson County, Mississippi (Gulf LNG Terminal or Terminal). Such
additions will include the installation of liquefaction and export facilities to be integrated
with the existing Terminal to allow it to liquefy natural gas delivered by pipeline, store the
produced LNG in the existing LNG storage tanks, and load it into LNG vessels via the
existing marine loading jetty for export (the Project or Facility). The Terminal will
retain the capability to receive, store, re-gasify, and deliver natural gas as originally
constructed, thereby making the Terminal bi-directional. GLLC proposes to site, construct,
and operate the proposed Project in response to the global demand for natural gas produced
in the United States.
The proposed Facility will include a complete natural gas liquefaction and export plant with
associated support facilities and utilities, and modification of the existing LNG tanks and
piping for both unloading and loading service. The liquefaction plant will be integrated
with the existing Terminal, which will then be capable of being operated in a bi-directional
manner so that both import and export functions can be performed. The Facility will be
designed to produce nominally 10 million tons per annum (MTPA) of LNG in two phases.
Phase 1 of the Project includes a single 5 MTPA pretreatment facility and liquefaction train
(Train 1) and Phase 2 of the Project includes a second 5 MTPA pretreatment facility and
liquefaction train (Train 2). Design and construction of Train 1 will accommodate certain
provisions for Train 2 but Train 2 itself will be constructed in Phase 2.
Mr. Paul Necaise
April 18, 2014

PAGE 2
A Project overview and the proposed Project facilities boundary is shown on the attached
mapping. GLLC will identify any non-jurisdictional facilities associated with its proposal
for possible inclusion in the scope of review as soon as possible.
The proposed Project will be regulated by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
(FERC), with other federal agencies acting as cooperating partners in review of their
respective jurisdictions under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). GLLC will
file for approval from the FERC in May 2014 to use the FERC pre-filing process in preparing
its application under Section 3 of the NGA. The FERC has established its pre-filing process
to encourage natural gas project applicants to engage in early project development
involvement with the public and agencies, as contemplated by NEPA and the Council on
Environmental Quality regulations.
The preliminary Project schedule includes the following target dates:
a. Pre-filing process begins May 2014
b. Complete consultations, submit permit applications April 2015
c. Submit Section 3 application to FERC April 2015
d. NEPA review period April 2015 to February 2016
e. Receive FERC Authorization April 2016
f. Start Construction June 2016
Existing conditions at the Terminal have been previously analyzed in the Commissions
Final Environmental Impact Statement that was published for the LNG Clean Energy
Project (FERC Docket No. CP06-12-000 and CP06-13-000) in November 2006.
On behalf of GLLC, we respectfully request that the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service review
the information we have provided and determine its ability to participate in the
Commissions pre-filing process for the GLLC Project. We will be in contact with you during
the Project review phase for further consultation and review. Please contact me at 678-530-
4350 or by email at dthomas9@ch2m.com if you need further information.

Sincerely,

David Thomas
Principal Technologist/Service Area Lead
CH2M HILL
Enclosures
Figure 1-1
Project Overview
R:\GIS\SCO\GulfLNGLiquefactionCompany\MapFiles\Project_Overview.mxd aomalley 4/17/2014 10:38:05 AM
PROJECT LOCATION
Notes:
TomTom, 2013
^_
^_ ^_
Transco / FGT Interconnect Destin Meter Station
0 1 0.5
Miles
$
Legend
^_
^_
^_
Figure 1-2
Project Facilities
PROJECT LOCATION
Notes:
TomTom, 2013
0 800 400
Feet
$
Legend
Proposed Marine Offloading Facility

20140508_USFWS_PREFILING FOLLOWUP CALL.DOCX/[INSERT DOCUMENT LOCATOR] 1
T E L E P H O N E C O N V E R S A T I O N R E C O R D
Gulf LNG Liquefaction Company Project

Call To: Mr. Paul Necaise; USFWS
Phone No.: 228 493-6631 Date: 5/8/2014
Call From: Matt Brown Time: 1127 am
Message Taken By:
Subject: Follow-up regarding pre-filing and to ask if they have any questions about the project and if they expect to
be able to participate in the prefiling process. Also to inform them that we plan to have some meetings in the future
and are wondering if they are interested in attending and participating. Also to explain that we are beginning the
FERC process and we will be in contact with them with additional info.
Mr. Necaise stated that he had received the agency notification letter but has not had a chance to review it. He also
stated that he plans to be involved in the pre-filing process and will attend scoping meetings if he is available.
Project No.: 492903

National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration (NOAA)
CH2M HILL
Atlanta, GA 30328
Tel 770.604.9095
Fax 770.604.9183

April 18, 2014

Ryan Hendron
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
263 13th Ave. South


Dear Mr. Hendron :
and operate the proposed Project in response to the global demand for natural gas
produced in the United States.
designed to produce nominally 10 million tons per annum (MTPA) of LNG in two
phases. Phase 1 of the Project includes a single 5 MTPA pretreatment facility and
liquefaction train (Train 1) and Phase 2 of the Project includes a second 5 MTPA
pretreatment facility and liquefaction train (Train 2). Design and construction of Train 1
will accommodate certain provisions for Train 2 but Train 2 itself will be constructed in
Phase 2.
Mr. Ryan Hendron
April 18, 2014

PAGE 2
On behalf of GLLC, we respectfully request that the National Marine Fisheries Service
review the information we have provided and determine its ability to participate in the
Commissions pre-filing process for the GLLC Project. We will be in contact with you
during the Project review phase for further consultation and review. Please contact me at
678-530-4350 or by email at dthomas9@ch2m.com if you need further information.

Sincerely,

David Thomas
CH2M HILL
Enclosures
Figure 1-1
Project Overview
PROJECT LOCATION
Notes:
TomTom, 2013
^_
^_ ^_
0 1 0.5
Miles
$
Legend
^_
^_
^_
Figure 1-2
Project Facilities
PROJECT LOCATION
Notes:
TomTom, 2013
0 800 400
Feet
$
Legend

National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS)
CH2M HILL
Atlanta, GA 30328
Tel 770.604.9095
Fax 770.604.9183

April 18, 2014

Mark Thompson
National Marine Fisheries Service
3500 Delwood Beach Road
Panama City, Florida 32408


Dear Mr. Thompson:
Mr. Mark Thompson
April 18, 2014

PAGE 2
On behalf of GLLC, we respectfully request that the National Marine Fisheries Service
review the information we have provided and determine its ability to participate in the

Sincerely,

David Thomas
CH2M HILL
Enclosures
Figure 1-1
Project Overview
PROJECT LOCATION
Notes:
TomTom, 2013
^_
^_ ^_
0 1 0.5
Miles
$
Legend
^_
^_
^_
Figure 1-2
Project Facilities
PROJECT LOCATION
Notes:
TomTom, 2013
0 800 400
Feet
$
Legend

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE)
Mobile District
CH2M HILL
Atlanta, GA 30328
Tel 770.604.9095
Fax 770.604.9183

April 18, 2014

Munther Sahawneh
109 St. Joseph Street
Mobile, AL 36602


Dear Mr. Sahawneh :
Mr. Munther Sahawneh
April 18, 2014

PAGE 2
On behalf of GLLC, we respectfully request that the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers review

Sincerely,

David Thomas
CH2M HILL
Enclosures
Figure 1-1
Project Overview
PROJECT LOCATION
Notes:
TomTom, 2013
^_
^_ ^_
0 1 0.5
Miles
$
Legend
^_
^_
^_
Figure 1-2
Project Facilities
PROJECT LOCATION
Notes:
TomTom, 2013
0 800 400
Feet
$
Legend

20140508_USACE_PREFILING FOLLOWUP CALL.DOCX/[INSERT DOCUMENT LOCATOR] 1

Call To: Mr. Munther Sahawneh; USACE
Phone No.: 251-690-2658 Date: 5/8/2014
Message Taken By:
Mr. Munther stated that he had not received the agency notification letter. I told him I will send him an electronic
copy via email. Mr. Munther also stated that he or a representative from his office will be involved in the pre-filing
process and plan to attend scoping meetings.
Project No.: 492903

1
Ripley, Julia/ATL
From: Brown, Matt/BHM
Sent: Thursday, May 08, 2014 12:37 PM
To: munther.nsahawneh@usace.army.mil
Cc: Ripley, J ulia/ATL
Subject: Gulf LNG Liquefaction Facility Project
Attachments: 201404118_USACE_GLLC.Project.Info.Letter.pdf
Categories: Gulf LNG
Munther,asdiscussed,attachedisanelectronicversionofthenotificationlettersenttoyourofficeregardingthe
proposedGulfLNGLiquefactionFacilityProjectinPascagoulaMS.
Thanks,
Matt Brown
Certified Ecologist, ESA
Southeast Environmental Services Business Group

CH2M HILL
2112 11th Ave South #320
Birmingham, AL 35205
205.209.3007 ext. 33007 (Office)
225.978.3700 (Cell)
205.326-8878 (Fax)
matt.brown@ch2m.com

CH2M HILL
Atlanta, GA 30328
Tel 770.604.9095
Fax 770.604.9183

April 18, 2014

Munther Sahawneh
109 St. Joseph Street
Mobile, AL 36602


Dear Mr. Sahawneh :
Mr. Munther Sahawneh
April 18, 2014

PAGE 2
On behalf of GLLC, we respectfully request that the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers review

Sincerely,

David Thomas
CH2M HILL
Enclosures
Figure 1-1
Project Overview
PROJECT LOCATION
Notes:
TomTom, 2013
^_
^_ ^_
0 1 0.5
Miles
$
Legend
^_
^_
^_
Figure 1-2
Project Facilities
PROJECT LOCATION
Notes:
TomTom, 2013
0 800 400
Feet
$
Legend
AGENDA/Notes

GULF LNG LIQUEFACTION/MOBILE DISTRICT CORPS OF ENGINEERS
MEETING IN MOBILE, ALABAMA
June 12, 2014 @ 0900 hrs

INTRODUCTIONS
o Attendee list attached; many Corps disciplines represented during meeting

LIQUEFACTION PROJECT OVERVIEW (Powerpoint presentation)
o Brief project overview provided by Brian Gilliland

KEY FACILITY LAYOUT CONSIDERATIONS
o Provided full page handout of proposed project facilities as referenced by Figure 1-1
from Resource Report 1

ANTICIPATED SEC. 10, SEC. 404 IMPACTS
Dredging/Sec. 103
o Provided brief narrative of the temporary Marine Offloading Facility (MOF)
Wetland impacts
o Provided brief narrative of potential impacts to Water of the US and proposed
mitigation site, figure provided in presentation

RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN EXISTING AND PROPOSED PERMITS
Wetland mitigation areas
Sec. 408 consultation

POTENTIAL MITIGATIVE MEASURES
Wetland mitigation
Beneficial use of dredged material

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION NEEDS

FUTURE MEETINGS/DISCUSSIONS

Notes:

Discussed the following:
o Proposed impacts to the BCDMMS
o Potential impacts to the Corps mitigation area (flare systems)
o Project schedule and timelines
o Corps permitting process and 408 review
o Port Authority notification of proposed impacts
o Possible Dredge Material Management Plan review and approval
o Proposed wetland impacts
o GLLC Open House scheduled June 26, 2014
ATTENDEES AT MEETING OF GLLC AND MOBILE DISTRICT CORPS OF
ENGINEERS; JUNE 12, 2104 (IN MOBILE DISTRICT OFFICE IN MOBILE,
ALABAMA)

Corps of Engineers

Dean Trawick (251)690-3254 cubie.d.trawick@usace.army.mil
Randall Harvey,EN (251)690-2718 randall.b.harvey@usace.army.mil
Kelly McElhenney, OP-TN (251)694-3722 kelly.n.mcelhenney@usace.army.mil
Joseph Givhan, OC (251)6903343 joseph.p.givhan.jr@usace.army.mil
Jenny Jacobson, PD (251)690-2724 jennifer.l.jacobson@usace.army.mil
Justin McDonald, EN (251)690-3314 justin.s.mcdonald@usace.army.mil
Gordon Gough,PM (251)690-3310 gordon.d.gough@usace.army.mil
Allison Monroe, Reg. (251)690-3228 allison.f.monroe@usace.army.mil

GLLC Team

Tim McKellar, K-M (205)907-4843 tim_mckellar@kindermorgan.com
Brian Gilliland, GLE (228)202-3651 brian_gilliland@kindermorgan.com
Jill Bockenstette, GLE (228)202-3634 jill_bockenstette@kindermorgan.com
Darwin Stillson, GLE (228)202-3649 darwin_stillson@kindermorgan.com
Barry A. Vittor, BVA (251)633-6100 bvittor@bvaenviro.com

USACE Presentation
June 12, 2014
Gulf LNG Liquefaction Project - Timeline
On May 21, 2014 FERC issued its approval to initiate the
Commissions Pre-Filing Process for the GLLC
Liquefaction Project
GLLC will submit initial Draft Resource Reports 1 and 10
to FERC on June 20, 2014
GLLC is preparing its public outreach and will hold an
Open House for the Project in Pascagoula on June 26,
2014
GLLC plans to file major federal permit applications
concurrently with its application to the FERC in April
2015
2
GLLC Facilities
Scope of GLLC Facilities Installation of natural gas
processing, liquefaction and export facilities
Phase I - single train, 5 MTPA* nominal capacity
Phase II - second train, 5 MTPA nominal capacity
Total - 10 MTPA nominal capacity
Location existing Gulf LNG Terminal in Jackson County,
Mississippi
Estimated Schedule
Submit Project Application to FERC April 2015
Complete NEPA review process, receive Notice to Proceed with
construction June 2016
Production of first LNG from liquefaction 3
rd
Quarter 2019
*MTPA million tons per annum (1 MTPA ~ 140,000 Mcf/d)
3
Gulf LNG Terminal facility modifications
Terminal
Replacement and/or addition of internal pumps in existing tanks
Modify emergency plant shutdown system
Piping modifications to connect new facilities with existing facilities
Modify piping and add valves to allow for bi-directional flows
Modify and expand hurricane protection wall
Modify existing office, control rooms and warehouses
Construct temporary marine offloading facility (MOF)
Pipeline
Modify existing meter stations/interconnect piping to allow for bi-directional
flows
4
Estimated Timeline for Design Development
& Project Milestones
5
Estimated Key Milestone Dates
Commence Front End Engineering Design
April 2014
Approval of Pre-Filing Request
May 2014
Submit Application to Commission
April 2015
Environmental Assessment Issued
February 2016
Commission Order Issued
April 2016
File Initial Implementation Plan
May 2016
Initiate Construction
June 2016
Phase I In Service for Gulf LNG Liquefaction Project
3Q 2019
Phase II In Service for Gulf LNG Liquefaction Project
2Q 2020
Current Gulf LNG Terminal Facility Layout
6
MS Sound
Bayou Casotte
Current Pipeline Connections
7
Proposed Liquefaction Facility Layout
8
Potential Impacts to Waters of the U.S. and Proposed Mitigation
Site
9
Potential Environmental Considerations
Land Impacts
Working with Port of Pascagoula and Army Corps of Engineers (USACE)
Acquisition of additional land (BCDMMS) adjacent to Gulf LNG Terminal
Water Impacts
Construction of a temporary Marine Offloading Facility
Dredge material disposal at approved offshore location or beneficial use site
Potential impacts to North and South Marsh mitigation areas
New WSA or LOI not required because Project will not increase size or
frequency of LNG Vessel traffic previously authorized
Ballast Water Discharge to be addressed under USCG Ballast Water
Discharge Standard
Essential Fish Habitat and Biological Assessments to be developed to
address impacts to marine organisms
Warehouse Yards
Potential temporary off-site contractor yards and parking
Potential impact to North Marsh area
10
Summary and Path Forward
GLLC has begun the FERC Pre-Filing process and
plans to file an application with the FERC in April
2015
GLLC is reviewing design options based on Project
requirements
GLLC will continue with agency consultation process
GLLC will determine impacts to Waters of the U.S.
upon completion of Project design
GLLC will prepare appropriate mitigation plans for
unavoidable Project impacts
Schedule additional meetings when, where, who?
11

Federal Emergency Management Agency
(FEMA)
Region IV
CH2M HILL
Atlanta, GA 30328
Tel 770.604.9095
Fax 770.604.9183

April 18, 2014

Ms. Susan Wilson
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Atlanta, GA 30341


Dear Ms. Wilson:
Ms. Susan Wilson
April 18, 2014

PAGE 2
On behalf of GLLC, we respectfully request that the Federal Emergency Management
Agency review the information we have provided and determine its ability to participate in
the Commissions pre-filing process for the GLLC Project. We will be in contact with you

Sincerely,

David Thomas
CH2M HILL
Enclosures
Figure 1-1
Project Overview
PROJECT LOCATION
Notes:
TomTom, 2013
^_
^_ ^_
0 1 0.5
Miles
$
Legend
^_
^_
^_
Figure 1-2
Project Facilities
PROJECT LOCATION
Notes:
TomTom, 2013
0 800 400
Feet
$
Legend

Mississippi Natural Science Museum/Mississippi
Department of Wildlife, Fisheries and Parks
(MNSM/MDWFP)
CH2M HILL
Atlanta, GA 30328
Tel 770.604.9095
Fax 770.604.9183

April 18, 2014

Andy Sanderson
Mississippi Natural Science Museum
Jackson, MS 39202


Dear Mr. Sanderson :
Mr. Andy Sanderson
April 18, 2014

PAGE 2
On behalf of GLLC, we respectfully request that the Mississippi Natural Science Museum
Natural Heritage Program review the information we have provided and determine its
ability to participate in the Commissions pre-filing process for the GLLC Project. We will be
in contact with you during the Project review phase for further consultation and review.
Please contact me at 678-530-4350 or by email at dthomas9@ch2m.com if you need further
information.

Sincerely,

David Thomas
CH2M HILL
Enclosures
Figure 1-1
Project Overview
PROJECT LOCATION
Notes:
TomTom, 2013
^_
^_ ^_
0 1 0.5
Miles
$
Legend
^_
^_
^_
Figure 1-2
Project Facilities
PROJECT LOCATION
Notes:
TomTom, 2013
0 800 400
Feet
$
Legend

20140508_MNSM_PREFILING FOLLOWUP CALL.DOCX/[INSERT DOCUMENT LOCATOR] 1

Call To: Mr. Andy Sanderson; MNSM
Phone No.: 601-576-6000 Date: 5/8/2014
Message Taken By: Receptionist

Project No.: 492903

Mississippi Department of Marine Resources
(MDMR)
CH2M HILL
Atlanta, GA 30328
Tel 770.604.9095
Fax 770.604.9183

April 18, 2014

Willa Brantley
Mississippi Department of Marine Resources
Wetland Permitting Program Coordinator
1141 Bayview Ave.
Biloxi MS, 39532


Dear Ms. Brantley :
Ms. Willa Brantley
April 18, 2014

PAGE 2
On behalf of GLLC, we respectfully request that the Mississippi Department of Marine
Resources review the information we have provided and determine its ability to participate
in the Commissions pre-filing process for the GLLC Project. We will be in contact with you

Sincerely,

David Thomas
CH2M HILL
Enclosures
Figure 1-1
Project Overview
PROJECT LOCATION
Notes:
TomTom, 2013
^_
^_ ^_
0 1 0.5
Miles
$
Legend
^_
^_
^_
Figure 1-2
Project Facilities
PROJECT LOCATION
Notes:
TomTom, 2013
0 800 400
Feet
$
Legend

20140508_MDMR_PREFILING FOLLOWUP CALL.DOCX/[INSERT DOCUMENT LOCATOR] 1

Call To: Ms. Willa Brantley; MDMR
Phone No.: 228-374-5000 Date: 5/8/2014
Message Taken By: Voicemail

Project No.: 492903

Mississippi Department of Environmental
Quality (MDEQ)
CH2M HILL
Atlanta, GA 30328
Tel 770.604.9095
Fax 770.604.9183

April 18, 2014

Bryan Collins
Branch Chief of Energy and Transportation
Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality
Jackson, MS 39201
601-961-5239


Dear Mr. Collins:
and operate the proposed Project in response to the global demand for natural gas
produced in the United States.
designed to produce nominally 10 million tons per annum (MTPA) of LNG in two
phases. Phase 1 of the Project includes a single 5 MTPA pretreatment facility and
liquefaction train (Train 1) and Phase 2 of the Project includes a second 5 MTPA
pretreatment facility and liquefaction train (Train 2). Design and construction of Train 1
will accommodate certain provisions for Train 2 but Train 2 itself will be constructed in
Phase 2.
Mr. Bryan Collins
April 18, 2014

On behalf of GLLC, we respectfully request that the Mississippi Department of
Environmental Quality review the information we have provided and determine its ability
to participate in the Commissions pre-filing process for the GLLC Project. We will be in
contact with you during the Project review phase for further consultation and review.
information.

Sincerely,

David Thomas
CH2M HILL
Enclosures
Figure 1-1
Project Overview
PROJECT LOCATION
Notes:
TomTom, 2013
^_
^_ ^_
0 1 0.5
Miles
$
Legend
^_
^_
^_
Figure 1-2
Project Facilities
PROJECT LOCATION
Notes:
TomTom, 2013
0 800 400
Feet
$
Legend
CH2M HILL
Atlanta, GA 30328
Tel 770.604.9095
Fax 770.604.9183

April 18, 2014

Florance Bass
Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality
Jackson, MS 39201


Dear Ms. Bass:
Ms. Florance Bass
April 18, 2014

PAGE 2
On behalf of GLLC, we respectfully request that the Mississippi Department of
Environmental Quality review the information we have provided and determine its ability
to participate in the Commissions pre-filing process for the GLLC Project. We will be in
contact with you during the Project review phase for further consultation and review.
information.

Sincerely,

David Thomas
CH2M HILL
Enclosures
Figure 1-1
Project Overview
PROJECT LOCATION
Notes:
TomTom, 2013
^_
^_ ^_
0 1 0.5
Miles
$
Legend
^_
^_
^_
Figure 1-2
Project Facilities
PROJECT LOCATION
Notes:
TomTom, 2013
0 800 400
Feet
$
Legend

20140508_MDEQ - AIR_PREFILING FOLLOWUP CALL.DOCX/[INSERT DOCUMENT LOCATOR] 1

Call To: Mr. Bryan Collins; MDEQ - Air
Phone No.: 601-961-5239 Desk Date: 5/8/2014
Message Taken By:
Mr. Collins plans to attend scoping meetings and be involved in the pre-filing process. He did not have any questions
but commented that an accumulative air quality impact analysis may be required for the proposed project, as it was
an issue during permitting for the construction of the facility.
Project No.: 492903

20140508_MDEQ - WATER_PREFILING FOLLOWUP CALL.DOCX/[INSERT DOCUMENT LOCATOR] 1

Call To: Ms. Florance Bass; MDEQ - Water
Phone No.: (601) 961-5614 Desk Date: 5/8/2014

Project No.: 492903

Mississippi Department of Archives and History
(MDAH)
State Historic Preservation Office

309 Jefferson Highway, Suite A New Orleans, Louisiana 70121
(504) 837-1940 Fax (504) 837-1550 neworleans@rcgoodwin.com www.rcgoodwin.com
New Orleans, LA Frederick, MD Lawrence, KS Tallahassee, FL Las Cruces, NM
R. CHRISTOPHER GOODWIN & ASSOCIATES, INC.
c u l t u r a l r e s o u r c e m a n a g e m e n t a n d p r e s e r v a t i o n p l a n n i n g

April 18, 2014

Jim Woodrick
Division Director
Mississippi Department of Archives and History
Jackson, MS 39201

Subject: Gulf LNG Liquefaction Company, LLC Project, Jackson County, Mississippi.

Dear Mr. Woodrick:

Gulf LNG Liquefaction Company, LLC (GLLC), an affiliate of Gulf LNG Energy, LLC (GLE) and
Gulf LNG Pipeline, LLC, intends to add liquefaction and export capabilities to GLEs existing liquefied
natural gas (LNG) import terminal located near the City of Pascagoula in Jackson County, Mississippi
(Gulf LNG Terminal or Terminal). Such additions will include the installation of liquefaction and
export facilities to be integrated with the existing Terminal to allow it to liquefy natural gas delivered by
pipeline, store the produced LNG in the existing LNG storage tanks, and load it into LNG vessels via the
existing marine loading jetty for export (the Project or Facility). The Terminal will retain the capabil-
ity to receive, store, re-gasify, and deliver natural gas as originally constructed, thereby making the Ter-
minal bi-directional. GLLC proposes to site, construct, and operate the proposed Project in response to the
global demand for natural gas produced in the United States.

The proposed Facility will include a complete natural gas liquefaction and export plant with associated
support facilities and utilities, and modification of the existing LNG tanks and piping for both unloading
and loading service. The liquefaction plant will be integrated with the existing Terminal, which will then
be capable of being operated in a bi-directional manner so that both import and export functions can be
performed. The Facility will be designed to produce nominally 10 million tons per annum (MTPA) of
LNG in two phases. Phase 1 of the Project includes a single 5 MTPA pretreatment facility and liquefac-
tion train (Train 1) and Phase 2 of the Project includes a second 5 MTPA pretreatment facility and liq-
uefaction train (Train 2). Design and construction of Train 1 will accommodate certain provisions for
Train 2 but Train 2 itself will be constructed in Phase 2.

A Project overview and the proposed Project facilities boundary is shown on the attached mapping.
GLLC will identify any non-jurisdictional facilities associated with its proposal for possible inclusion in
the scope of review as soon as possible.

The proposed Project will be regulated by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), with
other federal agencies acting as cooperating partners in review of their respective jurisdictions under the
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). GLLC will file for approval from the FERC in May 2014
to use the FERC pre-filing process in preparing its application under Section 3 of the Natural Gas Act.
The FERC has established its pre-filing process to encourage natural gas project applicants to engage in
early project development involvement with the public and agencies, as contemplated by NEPA and the
Council on Environmental Quality regulations.
Mr. Jim Woodrick
April 21, 2014



Existing conditions at the Terminal have been previously analyzed in the Commissions Final Environ-
mental Impact Statement that was published for the LNG Clean Energy Project (FERC Docket No. CP06-
12-000 and CP06-13-000) in November 2006.

On behalf of GLLC, we respectfully request that the Mississippi Department of Archives and History re-
view the information we have provided and determine its ability to participate in the Commissions pre-
filing process for the GLLC Project. We will be in contact with you during the Project review phase for
further consultation and review. Please contact me at (504) 837-1940 or by email at jeber-
wine@rcgoodwin.com if you need further information.

Sincerely,

James Eberwine, M.S., R.P.A.
Project Manager

Enclosures

Figure 1-1
Project Overview
PROJECT LOCATION
Notes:
TomTom, 2013
^_
^_ ^_
0 1 0.5
Miles
$
Legend
^_
^_
^_
Figure 1-2
Project Facilities
PROJECT LOCATION
Notes:
TomTom, 2013
0 800 400
Feet
$
Legend

20140508_MDAH_PREFILING FOLLOWUP CALL.DOCX/[INSERT DOCUMENT LOCATOR] 1

Call To: Mr. Jim Woodrick; SHPO
Phone No.: 601-576-6908 Date: 5/8/2014

Project No.: 492903

20140603_MDAH_OMITTED MAP PHONE LOG.DOCX/[INSERT DOCUMENT LOCATOR] 1

Call To: Greg Williamson
Phone No.: 601-576-6850 Date: 6/3/2014
Call From: Julia Ripley Time: 12:05 pm
Message Taken By: N/A
Subject: Missing Map from 5/9/14 Letter Confirming MDAHs Participation in Pre-Filing Process
Project No.: 492903

Julia Ripley spoke with Greg Williamson. Julia asked Greg if the 5/9/2014 letter confirming MDAHs participation in
the pre-filing process was intended to include a map. Julia noted the 5/9 letter references an attached map with
hatched markings, yet there was not attachment included with the 5/9 letter. Greg apologized and confirmed that
the map had been mistakenly omitted from the correspondence. Greg planned to email Julia the map, and Julia
planned to insert the map as an attachment to the 5/9 letter.


Record of Communication

Date: June 11, 2014

Time: 10:50

Phone Call Participants: Greg Williamson (Mississippi Department of Archives and History) and James
Eberwine (R. Christopher Goodwin and Associates, Inc.)

Conversation: Mr. Eberwine called Mr. Williamson for clarification regarding his letter dated May 9,
2014. In that letter, Mr. Williamson stated, We have some potential concerns regarding the cultural
resources in the project areaprimarily in the hatched area of the enclosed map. When asked, Mr.
Williamson stated that the project area lies in a portion of the Mississippi coast that is known to possess a
high likelihood for encountering Native American sites, particularly mound sites, and that is has not been
surveyed previously for cultural resources. Further, he stated that it was the opinion of the Mississippi
Department of Archives and History (MDAH) that a cultural resources survey was necessary for those
portions of the Gulf LNG Liquefaction Company LLC Project that fall within their concern areas. Mr.
Eberwine stated that he likely would use a combination of shovel and auger testing in these locales to
determine if buried cultural resources were present, and Mr. Williamson stated that those field
methodologies were appropriate. He went on to say that Mr. Eberwine could contact Mr. David Abbott of
the MDAH if he had any additional questions regarding survey methodology. Mr. Eberwine then thanked
Mr. Williamson for his time and ended the phone call.

Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians


Date: May 21, 2014

To: Principal Chief Michell Hicks
P.O. Box 455
Quall Boundary
Cherokee, NC 28719
Phone: (828) 497-7000

Re: Gulf LNG Liquefaction Company, LLC, Terminal Expansion Project, Jackson County, Missis-
sippi.

Dear Chief Hicks:

(Gulf LNG Terminal or Terminal; Figures 1-1 and 1-2). Such additions will include the installation of
liquefaction and export facilities to be integrated with the existing Terminal to allow it to liquefy natural
gas delivered by pipeline, store the produced LNG in the existing LNG storage tanks, and load it into
LNG vessels via the existing marine loading jetty for export (the Project or Facility). The Terminal
will retain the capability to receive, store, re-gasify, and deliver natural gas as originally constructed,
thereby making the Terminal bi-directional. GLLC proposes to site, construct, and operate the proposed
Project in response to the global demand for natural gas produced in the United States.


National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). We are contacting you at this time to see if your Nation
has any comments or is aware of any potential traditional cultural properties (TCP) within this area. If
so, this information can be provided to KMLP and it also can be taken into consideration by the FERC.
While the regulations for implementing Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (at 36 CFR
800) allow companies or consultants to gather information, the FERC will be ultimately responsible for
determinations and for government to government consultations. After the initiation of FERCs involve-

ment, the FERC will contact your tribe through issuance of a Notice of Intent to Produce an Environmen-
tal Document.

If you would like to communicate directly with the FERC natural gas archaeological staff to discuss its
cultural resource review and consultation processes, please feel free to contact Paul Friedman, Senior
Technical Expert in Cultural Resources, at 202-502-8059 (email: paul.friedman@ferc.gov).

I thank you for taking the time to review this letter. Please do not hesitate to contact me at the New Orle-
ans number listed above if you have any questions or wish to discuss any aspect of this project.

Sincerely,

James J. Eberwine, M.A., R.P.A.
Project Manager

Comment Response Form Lake Charles Expansion Project (Acadia, Calcasieu, and Evangeline
Parishes, Louisiana)

P.O. Box 455
Quall Boundary
Cherokee, NC 28719

We have reviewed the proposed natural gas project and have:

No comments

The following comments (attach sheets if preferred):

Signature

Printed Name Date

Please return to: R. Christopher Goodwin & Associates, 309 Jefferson Highway, Suite A,
New Orleans, LA 70121. Thank you.
Figure 1-1
Project Facilities
PROJECT LOCATION
Notes:
TomTom, 2013
0 800 400
Feet
$
Legend

Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians


Date: May 21, 2014

To: Kenneth H. Carleton
Tribal Historic Preservation Officer/Archaeologist
101 Industrial Road
Choctaw, MS 39350
Phone: (601) 650-7316

Re: Gulf LNG Liquefaction Company, LLC, Terminal Expansion Project, Jackson County, Mississippi.

Dear Mr. Carleton:

(Gulf LNG Terminal or Terminal; Figures 1-1 and 1-2). Such additions will include the installation of
liquefaction and export facilities to be integrated with the existing Terminal to allow it to liquefy natural
gas delivered by pipeline, store the produced LNG in the existing LNG storage tanks, and load it into
LNG vessels via the existing marine loading jetty for export (the Project or Facility). The Terminal
will retain the capability to receive, store, re-gasify, and deliver natural gas as originally constructed,
thereby making the Terminal bi-directional. GLLC proposes to site, construct, and operate the proposed
Project in response to the global demand for natural gas produced in the United States.


National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). We are contacting you at this time to see if your Nation has
any comments or is aware of any potential traditional cultural properties (TCP) within this area. If so,
this information can be provided to KMLP and it also can be taken into consideration by the FERC.
While the regulations for implementing Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (at 36 CFR
800) allow companies or consultants to gather information, the FERC will be ultimately responsible for
determinations and for government to government consultations. After the initiation of FERCs involve-

ment, the FERC will contact your tribe through issuance of a Notice of Intent to Produce an Environmen-
tal Document.

If you would like to communicate directly with the FERC natural gas archaeological staff to dis-
cuss its cultural resource review and consultation processes, please feel free to contact Paul
Friedman, Senior Technical Expert in Cultural Resources, at 202-502-8059 (email:
paul.friedman@ferc.gov).

I thank you for taking the time to review this letter. Please do not hesitate to contact me at the New Orle-
ans number listed above if you have any questions or wish to discuss any aspect of this project.

Sincerely,

James J. Eberwine, M.A., R.P.A.
Project Manager

Comment Response Form Lake Charles Expansion Project (Acadia, Calcasieu, and Evangeline
Parishes, Louisiana)

Kenneth H. Carleton
Tribal Historic Preservation Officer/Archaeologist
101 Industrial Road
Choctaw, MS 39350

We have reviewed the proposed natural gas project and have:

No comments

The following comments (attach sheets if preferred):

Signature

Printed Name Date

Please return to: R. Christopher Goodwin & Associates, 309 Jefferson Highway, Suite A,
New Orleans, LA 70121. Thank you.
Figure 1-1
Project Facilities
PROJECT LOCATION
Notes:
TomTom, 2013
0 800 400
Feet
$
Legend
Appendix 1.B
Project Figures and Mapping
Figure 1.1-1
Project Location
Gulf LNG Liquefaction Company, LLC
R:\GIS\SCO\GulfLNGLiquefactionCompany\MapFiles\Resource_Reports\RR01\Project_Location.mxd aomalley 6/18/2014 1:26:03 PM
PROJECT LOCATION
Notes:
TomTom, 2013
^_
Project Location
0 10 5
Miles
$
Legend
^_
Project Location
Figure 1.4-1
Project Overview
R:\GIS\SCO\GulfLNGLiquefactionCompany\MapFiles\Resource_Reports\RR01\Project_Overview.mxd aomalley 6/18/2014 1:30:10 PM
PROJECT LOCATION
Notes:
TomTom, 2013
^_
^_ ^_
0 1 0.5
Miles
$
Legend
^_
^_
^_
Figure 1.4-2
Project Facilities
R:\GIS\SCO\GulfLNGLiquefactionCompany\MapFiles\Resource_Reports\RR01\Project_Facilities.mxd aomalley 6/18/2014 1:23:23 PM
PROJECT LOCATION
Notes:
TomTom, 2013
2. Sources: Google Earth Imagery
Construction
Staging Area
Exclusion
Zone
Utilities
Area
Train 1
Refrigerant
Storage Area
Maintenance
Building and
Warehouse
Switchyard
Construction
Staging Area
Marine
Offloading
Facility
New Substation
Facility
Control/Admin
Bldg & Parking
Ship Loading
Modification
Train 2 Existing
Terminal
Facilities
Flare Systems
0 800 400
Feet
$
Legend
Ship Loading Modification
Control/Admin Bldg & Parking
Construction Staging Area
Existing Terminal Facilities
Exclusion Zone
Flare Systems
Maintenance Building
and Warehouse
Marine Offloading
Facility (temporary)
Refrigerant Storage Area
New Substation Facility
Switchyard
Train 1
Train 2
Utilities Area
(Approx. 113 Acres)
Project Location
R:\GIS\SCO\GulfLNGLiquefactionCompany\MapFiles\Resource_Reports\RR01\Pascagoula_South_LetterSize.mxd aomalley 6/19/2014 11:38:34 AM
PROJECT LOCATION
Notes:
1. Sources: ESRI USA Topo Maps online service.
2. Pascagoula South USGS 24K Quad; published 1983.
Pascagoula
South
0 6,000 3,000
Feet
$
Legend
Proposed Project Boundary (Approx. 113 Acres)
Project Location
R:\GIS\SCO\GulfLNGLiquefactionCompany\MapFiles\Resource_Reports\RR01\Grand_Bay_SW_LetterSize.mxd aomalley 6/19/2014 11:41:15 AM
PROJECT LOCATION
Notes:
1. Sources: ESRI USA Topo Maps online service.
2. Grand Bay SW USGS 24K Quad; published 1978.
Grand
Bay SW
0 6,000 3,000
Feet
$
Legend
Proposed Project Boundary (Approx. 113 Acres)

Appendix 1.C
Stakeholder Information
(Volume II, Privileged and Confidential)

Initial Draft Resource Report 1 Project Description PDF

Enviado por

Dados do documento

Título original

Direitos autorais

Formatos disponíveis

Compartilhar este documento

Compartilhar ou incorporar documento

Opções de compartilhamento

Você considera este documento útil?

Este conteúdo é inapropriado?

Direitos autorais:

Formatos disponíveis

Initial Draft Resource Report 1 Project Description PDF

Enviado por

Direitos autorais:

Formatos disponíveis

June 2014

Gulf LNG Liquefaction Project

INITIAL DRAFT RESOURCE REPORT 1GENERAL PROJ ECT DESCRIPTION

Permit/Approval Administering Agency Contact Initiated Process Status

Permit/Approval Administering Agency Contact Initiated Process Status

Permit/Approval Administering Agency Contact Initiated Process Status

Permit/Approval Administering Agency Contact Initiated Process Status

Permit/Approval Administering Agency Contact Initiated Process Status

5/8/2014 contacted Bryan Collins to

Você também pode gostar