1

Cody Robert Judy

Attorney Pro Se
3031 So. Ogden Ave. Suite #2
Ogden, Utah 84401
801-497-6655
___________________________________________________________________________________
DISTRICT OF UTAH UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
________________________________________________________________________

CODY ROBERT JUDY , AFFIDAVIT FOR Clerks
Plaintiff, CERTIFICATE OF DEFAULT

v. Case No. 1:14cv00093
BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA JUDGE: Honorable TED STEWART
aka BARRY SOETORO , DNC ,
ORGANIZATION FOR ACTION et al.,
Defendant(s)
__________________________________________________________________________________

COMES NOW the Plaintiff, Cody Robert Judy pro se, and submits this AFFADAVIT FOR CERTIFICATE OF
DEFAULT with an accompanying proposed ORDER OF DEEFAULT.
AFFIDAVIT
I , Cody Robert Judy, certify under penalty of perjury under F.R.C.P Law, that I know the contents of this
Affidavit signed by me, and that the statements are true and correct.


FACTS & HISTORY OF THE CASE 1:14-cv-93

1. July 7
th
, Plaintiff filed the Civil Rights and Sherman/Clayton Act Complaint with the 20 Day
Summons and accompanying Order to Proceed Informa Pauperis.

2

2. July 8
th
Plaintiffs Motion was granted by Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead.


3. July 14
th
the Court recognized the Motion to Proceed without cost on the Docket and it was
filed on July 10
th
.

4. July 14
th
-The Court issued two 20 Day Summons that were mailed to the Plaintiff who received
them on the July 15
th
.

5. July 15
th
- An Order of Recusal was signed by Senior Judge Bruce S. Jenkins

6. July 16
th
-The Defendants were served the Complaint and the Court stamped 20 Day Summons
at the Democratic Party Headquarters at the address 825 North 300 West C400, Salt Lake City,
Utah 84103. (801) 328-1212 as is witnessed by ALI JUDY on the Return of Service to the person
named and authorized to receive the two (2) summonses and complaint(s).

7. July 16
th
-The verification of the service of the Complaint and the 20 Day Summons were
recognized by the Court by two witnesses, in two (2) witnessed RETURN OF SERVICE documents
filed in the court the same day. The two witnesses are the person authorized to receive the
service for the Defendants and the Server.

8. Additionally, Plaintiff affirms he witnessed the service as a standby and that the Courts stamped
20 Day Summon(s) and the Complaint were served with the Complaint witnessed on the Return
of Service filed with the Court Clerk.

9. July 17
th
- The Court recognized was the first day from which the 20 day summons begun.

10. July 21st The Order of Recusal was recognized by Judge Jenkins and filed in the Docket.

11. August 8
th
- a Default is recognized on the Court Issued 20 Day Summons by the two witnesses
on the Return of Service of the Complaint and the Court issued 20 Summons giving the
Defendants Twenty (20) Days plus three (3) days mailing service.

12. August 26
th
, 2014- Plaintiff filed a Motion and Order for Default and on the 26
th
Day of August,
2014 the U.S. District Court Judge Ted Stewart issued a MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER
DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE MOTION FOR DEFAULT ORDER OF JUDGEMENT stating Plaintiff
3

needs a DEFAULT CERTIFICATE from the Clerk of the Court and stated it would leave that
determination to the Clerk of the Court.

13. The Court recognized its MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE
MOTION FOR DEFAULT ORDER OF JUDGEMENT an award of $141 million in damages, upon
which Plaintiff asserts is a maximum award due to him from the Plaintiffs outlined in the
Complaint of the first instance and the Proposed Default Order.

14. Plaintiff acknowledges that $101 million dollars of this award is subject as a statute penalty
award for violations of law that have been lawfully asserted by the Plaintiff to the Judge of this
Court; and that $40 million are damages to the Plaintiffs Campaigns and Person from 2008 to
the present time and that a Certificate of Default may say as much respecting the discretion of
the Judge.

15. Plaintiff asserts to the best of his ability that he has administered the complaint and the
summons to the Defendants/or to those who claimed the ability to receive service for them as is
noted on the Return of Service and that it would prejudice Plaintiff if the Certificate of Default is
not granted by the Clerk of the Court having maintained the records since the initial filing.

16. Plaintiff asserts that there is nothing that was not properly administered in the Complaint and
OFFICALLY STAMPED 20 Day Summons served to the Defendant(s) that would not warrant their
understanding that the Court had indeed stamped the 20 Day Summons they were served along
with the complaint and thus there is/was no legal reason for them not to responsibly answer
the Courts Summons/Complaint understanding that no answer would mean that a judgment for
the damages would be taken against them in the event they did not answer.
17. "I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and
correct and further say not. Executed on.
Signed this _____ Day of September, 2014
Cody Robert Judy/ pro se _____________________________
I, Cody Robert Judy, residing at the address of 3031 So. Ogden Ave, #2, Ogden, Utah 84401 certify under
penalty of perjury under F.R.C.P Law, that I know the contents of this Affidavit signed by me, and that
the statements are true and correct.
4

___________________________
Signed by
Witnessed by: ______________________
State of __________ County of: ______________________

Notary Public: _______________________________________
Title:
My commission expires: