DLN Nofa - K - F - LN : Multi Lab (P) LTD

June, 2013
132 KV Damak-Kabeli Transmission Line Project-Nepal

132 KV Damak-Kabeli Transmission Line Project
Nepal
Contractor : Jaguar Overseas and Aster JV
Draft Final Report On Geotechnical Investigation Works
of
Client : Nepal Electricity Authority (NEA)
Submitted By :
P. O. Box : 5720, Kathmandu, Nepal
Tel : 5548900 Fax : (977-1) 5523103, E-mail : multilab@ntc.net.np
dlN^ Nofa -k|f=_ ln=
MULTI Lab (P) Ltd.
Pulchowk, Lalitpur
Proposed Site
DADELDHURA
BAITADI
KANCHANPUR
JHAPA
MORANG
ILAM
SUNSARI
BHOJPUR
OKHALDHUNGA
DOLAKHA
SINDHUPALCHOWK
KAVRE
LALITPUR
BHAKTAPUR
KATHMANDU
DHADING
RASUWA
MAKWANPUR
NUWAKOT
SANKHUWASABHA
DHANKUTA
UDAYAPUR
SAPTARI
TAPLEJUNG
TERHATHUM
PANCHTHAR
RAMECHAP
D
H
A
N
U
S
A
SIRAHA
SINDHULI
MANANG
TANAHUN
LAMJUNG
CHITWAN
GORKHA
BARA
PARSA
RAUTAHAT
SOLUKHUMBU
KHOTANG
ARGHAKHANCHI
GULMI
MYAGDI
DOLPA
BAGLUNG
PYUTHAN
KAPILBASTU
PALPA
RUPANDEHI
SYANGJA
PARBAT
MUSTANG
JAJARKOT
HUMLA
DAILEKH
KALIKOT
BANKE
MUGU
JUMLA
DANG
SALLYAN
RUKUM
MID WESTERN
ROLPA
BAJHANG
DOTI
KAILALI SURKHET
ACHHAM
BARDIA
BAJURA
WESTERN
KASKI
NAWALPARASI
CENTRAL
EASTERN
DARCHULA
SARLAHI
M
A
H
O
T
A
R
I
FAR WESTERN
TABLE OF CONTENTS

Table of Contents Page

1. INTRODUCTION 1

2. LITERATURE REVIEW 1
2.1 Geology 1
2.2 Siesmicity 1

3. FIELD WORK 1
3.1 General 1
3.2 Boring 2
3.3 Photographs 2
3.4 Sampling 2
3.5 Field Test 2
3.6 Ground Water Table Monitoring 2

4. LABORATORY TESTS AND RESULTS 3

5. SOIL DESCRIPTION 5

6. FOUNDATION ANALYSIS 5
6.1 General 5
6.2 Depth of Foundation 5
6.3 Computation of Bearing Capacity 5

7. PEAK HORIZONTAL ACCELERATION 13

8. DISCUSSIONS 13

9. RECOMMENDATIONS 14

10. REFERENCES 14

LIST OF TABLES
Table 1 Summary of Field Works 2
Table 2 Test Results Summary Sheet 4
Table 3 Soil Description 5
Table 4 Foundation Details 6
Table 5 SPT Value Correction 7-8
Table 6 Computation of Bearing Capacity Analysis 10
Table 7 Computation of Pile Foundation Analysis 11-12
Table 8 Summary of Bearing Capacity Analysis 13

APPENDICES
APPENDIX-A: Borehole Logs
APPENDIX-B: Test Result Sheets

Soil Investigation Work of 132 KV Damak-Kabeli Transmission Line Project-Nepal

MULTI Lab (P). Ltd. Page 1 of 14

1. INTRODUCTION
This report on proposed 132 KV Damak Kabeli Transmission Line Tower at Chainages km
19375 (Location No 10/2), 6121 (Location No AP - 4/0) and 5097 (Location No 3/5) discusses
the details of soil investigation works and foundation recommendations for its proposed site at
the stated locations. This work has been carried as per the information provided by R K Das
D.G.M (Projects), Jaguar Overseas (P) Ltd New Delhi. Pile capacity has been analyzed at
locations 10/2 and 3/5 the chainages of which are stated above. Open foundation has been
designed at location AP 4/0, chainage km 6121. The investigation work included literature
review, test pit excavation/ augur boring; SPT Test, Laboratory Tests and Analysis of various test
results to predict the allowable bearing capacity of sub-soil at the proposed Transmission Tower
Foundation and recommend the most suitable foundation compatible to the prevailing soil
conditions. The details of the investigation work as well as that of findings of the analysis carried
out are presented in the following paragraphs.

2. LITERATURE REVIEW
2.1 Geology
The literature study has been confined mostly in the geology and seismicity of the study area.
Geologically the study area lies in Terai and Midland between Mahabharat range in the south and
higher Himalaya in the north. Some portion of the study area also lies in the siwalik formation. The
geo-morphological units of the area consist of low lying hills, river basins and tectonic basins. The
width is approximately 30 km and extends from east to west of Nepal in the form of a strip. The
main rock formations are purple phyllite, amphibolite, dolomite, sandstone, mudstone, quartzite
and gneiss. In most areas rock phyllite lies at the top followed by amphibollite. In some areas rocks
above amphibollite comprise dolomite, quartzite and gneiss.

2.2 Seismicity
The Characteristics of seismic ground vibration expected at any locations depends upon the
magnitude of earthquake, its depth of focus, distance from the epicenter, characteristics of path
through the seismic waves travel and the soil strata on which the structure stand. The random
earthquake ground motions, which cause structures to vibrate, can be resolved into three mutually
perpendicular directions. The predominant direction of ground vibration is usually horizontal.

Nepal lies in the zone which is highly vulnerable in the event earthquake. As per the study
conducted by JICA 2002, at any time major earthquakes of intensity over VII in Modified Marcalli
Intensity (MMI) could trigger in the country. The intensity could go up to IX in the study area. This
intensity is equivalent to 7.5 in moment scale.

3. FIELD WORK
3.1 General
The fieldwork included Rotary Drilling, Sampling, Standard Penetration Test and Water Table
Monitoring. The details of the field works carried out at the proposed site are presented in Table 1.



Table 1 - Summary of Field Works
S No Location Boring
Type
BH/PIT
No
Started
on
Completed
on
Depth
m
1 10/2 Rotary 1 22 05 - 2013 25 05 - 2013 12
2 AP 4/0
Rotary
2 26 05 - 2013 27 05 - 2013 6
3 3/5
Rotary
3 27 05 - 2013 28 05 - 2013 12

3.2 Boring
The field investigation was carried out by using Rotary Drilling. The drilling holes were logged
continuously in the field for all the locations. The logs included visual classification of soil,
records of SPT values and position of ground water table. The field record of logs were updated
after completion of laboratory investigation works wherever was necessary. The updated logs for
the tower foundation sites are presented in Appendix A.

3.3 Photographs
A set of color photographs was taken to show the record of ground investigation work. The
photographs cover the location of borehole, drilling of hole and pits, sample recovery and soil
samples.

3.4 Sampling
Before any disturbed samples were taken, the bore holes were washed clean to flush any loose
disturbed soil particles deposited during the boring operation. The samples obtained in the split
spoon barrel of SPT tube during SPT tests were preserved as representative disturbed samples.
The disturbed samples recovered were placed in airtight doubled 0.5 mm thick transparent plastic
bags, labeled properly for identification and finally sealed to avoid any loss of moisture. Only
then the samples were transportation to the laboratory for further investigation. Due to presence
of sandy soil undisturbed samples could not be taken.

3.5 Field Test.
Standard Penetration Test (SPT) was the field test conducted at the site. A standard split barrel
sampler was used in the test. The SPT tests were conducted in all the pits and augur holes of the
site at depth interval of every 1 m. The driving of split-spoon was recorded at every 150 mm of
penetration till the total depth of penetration of 450 mm was reached. The number of blows
recorded for the first 150 mm of penetration is disregarded. The number of blows recorded for
the last two 150 mm intervals are added and expressed as SPT N-value. The records of the SPT
values obtained are presented in logs in Appendix A. The recorded SPT values are without any
correction of overburden pressure and water table. The test was conducted without using liner.
The maximum rod length used was 13.50 m. The SPT value obtained in the field are corrected
for overburden pressure.

3.6 Ground Water Table Monitoring
The position of ground water table was measured at each borehole. The water level observed in
the bore holes at the end of a 24 hours long period after completion of boring work was taken as
the position of ground water table. The depth to ground water table from ground level for all the
boreholes are given in the borehole logs presented in the Appendix A.


4. LABORATORY TESTS AND RESULTS
The following laboratory tests were conducted:
a) Grain Size Analysis (Sieve)
b) Specific Gravity
c) Natural water content
The above laboratory tests were performed as per the specification laid down in the IS standard
codes. The above tests were conducted at the Geotechnical Laboratory of MULTI Lab (P) Ltd. at
Kopundole Height, Lalitpur. The results of laboratory tests were compiled in the form of Test
Results Summary Sheet and are presented in Table-2. The test result sheets of individual tests are
given in Appendix B.

Table 2. - Test Result Summary Sheet
Project : 132 KV Damak- Kabeli Transmission Line Project -Nepal
BH. Depth Water Specific
Content
No m Silt Clay % Gravity
0.00-3.00 58.00 34.00 6.64 -
3.00-6.00 39.00 54.00 11.70 2.66
6.00-9.00 28.00 64.00 13.14 -
9.00-12.00 60.00 35.00 5.51 -
0.20-3.00 3.00 81.00 17.10 2.61
3.00-6.00 6.00 81.00 18.13 -
0.00-3.00 5.00 60.00 16.77 -
3.00-9.00 4.00 81.00 12.70 2.64
9.00-12.00 8.00 70.00 15.22 -
35.00
15.00
22.00
8.00
5.00
16.00
13.00
3
1
2
MULTI Lab (P) Ltd.
Fines
% of
Gravel Sand
8.00
7.00


5. SOIL DESCRIPTION
The surface as well as sub-surface geological features existing at the proposed site is shown in the
borehole logs presented in Appendix A. The soil types existing at the site are as shown in Table 3
below.
Table 3 Soil Description
S No Location BH No
1 10/2 1 The soil to a depth of 3.0 m is gray to white very dense moist sandy
gravels with traces of cobbles. From depth 3.0 to 6 m the soil is
gray to brown very dense moist gravelly sand with traces of
cobbles. Between 6.0 m to 9.0 m depth the soil is gray to brown to
white moist very dense coarse to medium sand including gravels
and cobbles. The soil from depth 9.0 m to investigated depth of 12
m is gray to brown and white moist very dense sandy gravels
including cobbles.
2 AP 4/0 2 The soil to a depth of 0.20 m is vegetable top soil. From depth 0.20
to 3 m the soil is gray to brown and white moist medium dense silty
sand with traces of gravels. The soil from depth 3.0 m to
investigated depth of 6 m is gray to white moist medium dense
coarse to fine sandwith gravels and silt.
3 3/5 3 The soil to a depth of 3.0 m is gray to brown loose to medium dense
moist silty sand with traces of pebbles. From depth 3.0 to 9.0 m the
soil is gray to brown and white medium dense moist silty coarse to
fine sand with traces of gravels. The soil from depth 9.0 m to
investigated depth of 12 m is gray to brown moist medium dense
silty sand including traces of pebbles.

6. FOUNDATION ANALYSIS
6.1 General
Before selecting a given type of foundation vis--vis the particular set of conditions prevailing at
a site, the probable performance of the foundation must be judged with respect to two types of
potentially unsatisfactory behavior. In the first place, the bearing capacity of the foundation soil
must be sufficient enough to ensure that the induced total or differential settlement is not
detrimental. Secondly, the bearing capacity should be such that excessive shear strain, which
could lead to shear failure, does not occur.
6.2 Depth of Foundation
The depth of foundation is governed mainly factors such as scour depth and the nature of the
subsoil strata to place the foundation, basement requirement and other environmental factors.
Isolated pad foundation is the common type of foundation for transmission tower. The locations
at the stated towers lie at the river crossing. There could be possibility scour to the tower
foundation. As a result the foundation should be placed at least 2 m depth below the depth of
maximum scour. At the moment hydrological data are not available, the maximum depth of
scour has been assumed. Table 4 shown below shows the details of data assumed and types of
foundation adopted.



Table 4 Foundation Details
BH
No
Location No Chainage
km
Assumed
Scour
Depth from
Bed Level,
m
Type of
Foundation
Adopted
Minimum Depth of
Foundation from
River Bed, m
1 10/2 19375 4 Pile 9
2 AP 4/0 6121 3 Open 5
3 3/5 5097 4 Pile 9

6.3 Computation of Bearing Capacity
6. 3.1 General
Open and pile foundation have been analyzed at these locations. The bearing capacity analysis
has been made using both shear failure and settlement criteria for open foundation at location AP
4/0. The analysis was carried out based on the results of corrected SPT Value. The depth
adopted for open foundation is 5 m from river bed. Terzaghis method was used to determine the
bearing capacity from shear failure criteria. The equation suggested by Peck et al. (1974) has
been used to determine bearing capacity on the basis of settlement criteria. The SPT value
correction is shown in Table 5.

At locations 10/2 and 3/5 pile foundations have been analyzed. The diameter of pile adopted is
900 mm as per the email by R. K. Das. The foundation details are shown in Table 4 above.

COMPUTATION OF BEARING CAPACITY Table 5
DAMAK-KABELI TRANSMISSION LINE- 3 HOLES Location: Illam
SPT Value Correction
BH No 1 10/2 Chainage: 19375 km
kN/m
3
18
sub kN/m
3
8 GWT, m
0.00
Remarks
S.No Depth, m
Measured
SPT
p
o
' C
N
Corrected SPT
Value
1 3 50 24 1.48 74 2.0 3.0
2 4.5 50 36 1.34 67 Width p
o
' =g'*D
3 6 50 48 1.25 62 4 5.0 C
N
=0.77log10(2000/po')
4 7.5 50 60 1.17 59
5 9 50 72 1.11 56
6 10.5 50 84 1.06 53
7 12 50 96 1.02 51
BH No 2 AP -4/0 Chainage: 6121 km
kN/m
3
18
sub kN/m
3
8 GWT, m
0.00
Remarks
S.No Depth, m
Measured
SPT
p
o
' C
N
Corrected SPT
Value
1 3 12 24 1.48 18 2.0 3.0
2 4.5 14 36 1.34 19 Width p
o
' =g'*D
3 6 13 48 1.25 16 4 5.0 C
N
=0.77log10(2000/po')
4 7.5 NA NA NA NA
5 9 NA NA NA NA
6 10.5 NA NA NA NA
7 12 NA NA NA NA
Depth
Depth
50 50
Design SPT Value
Design SPT Value
18 18
BH No 3 3/5 Chainage: 5097 km
kN/m
3
18
sub kN/m
3
8 GWT, m
0.00
Remarks
S.No Depth, m
Measured
SPT
p
o
' C
N
Corrected SPT
Value
1 3 13 24 1.48 19 2.0 3.0
2 4.5 10 36 1.34 13 Width p
o
' =g'*D
3 6 15 48 1.25 19 4 5.0 C
N
=0.77log10(2000/po')
4 7.5 14 60 1.17 16
5 9 16 72 1.11 18
6 10.5 14 84 1.06 15
7 12 15 96 1.02 15
Depth
17 17
Design SPT Value


6.3.2 Open Foundation
Shear failure Criteria The following equation is used to determine bearing capacity.

) 1 ( * * * * * 4 . 0
) ( q f net ult
N D N B Q
(1)
Settlement Criteria To check bearing pressure on the basis of settlement criteria the following
relation has been used.

w c n
R N q * * 5 . 10
for 40 mm allowable settlement (2)

Where,

n
q
= Net bearing capacity from settlement criteria
N
C
= Corrected SPT Value for overburden pressure
R
W
= Water Table Correction Factor
Q
ult(net)
= Net Ultimate Bearing Capacity Shear Criteria
B = Width of Foundation
D
f
= Depth of Foundation
= Soil Unit Weight
N , N
q
= Bearing Capacity Factors for weight and surcharge
Using the appropriate relationships suggested above the analyses was carried out. The details of
the analysis are shown in Table 6.

6.3.3 Cohesionless Soil Single Pile Action
The ultimate resistance of single pile in cohesionless soil is given by:

s
Q
b
Q ult
Q

tan * ' * * * * '
0
* * ) 1 (
ave
p K
s
A
u
c p
b
A
q
N ult
Q
Where,

ult
Q = Ultimate pile resistance

b
Q = Base Resistance
Qs = Shaft Resistance

Nq
= Bearing Capacity Factor

b
A
= Area of Base

As
= Area of Shaft

'
0
p
= Effective overburden pressure at base of pile

avg
p' = Effective overburden pressure over the length of pile
K = Earth pressure Coefficient
= Angle of wall friction
Using the appropriate relationships suggested above the analyses was carried out. The details of
the analysis are shown in Table 7.
COMPUTATION OF BEARING CAPACITY
Damak Kabeli Transmission Line Project Table 6
BH No 2 Chainage: 6121 km Location: AP - 4/0
COMPUTATION OF BEARING CAPACITY FROM SHEAR FAILURE CRITERIA
Description Unit Symbol
Remarks
Depth m D
f
5 5
Width m B
4 5
Length m L
4 5
Unit Weight of Soil kN/m
3
18 18
Depth to Water Table m Dw
0.00 0.00 WT at Surface
Maximum depth of Scour Assumed m Ds
3.00 3.00
Corrected SPT Value
18 18
Bearing Capacity Factor - N
27 27
Bearing Capacity Factor - Nq
27 27
Net Ultimate Bearing capacity
kN/m
2
Q
net
1559 1656
Factor of Safety F
3 3
Safe Bearing capacity
kN/m
2
q
n
520 552
BEARING CAPACITY FROM SETTLEMENT CRITERIA
Water Table correction Factor - Rw 0.50 0.50
Net Safe Bearing capacity kN/m
2
qn 102 102
Remarks Settlement Criteria Governs Bearing Capacity
Data
COMPUTATION OF BEARING CAPACITY
Damak Kabeli Transmission Line Project Table 7
Pile Foundation
COMPUTATION OF BEARING CAPACITY FROM SHEAR FAILURE CRITERIA
Description Unit Symbol
Remarks
BH No 1 3
Location - - 10/2 3/5
Chainage km Ch 19375 5097
Diameter of pile shaft m d 0.90 0.90
Diameter of pile bulb at base m D 0.90 0.90
Base Area m
2
A
b
0.64 0.64
Shaft area per meter m
2
As 2.83 2.83
Total length of pile m L 14 14
Unit weight kN/m
3
18 18
Submerged Unit weight kN/m
3
sub
8.00 8.00
Length up to which shaft resistance ignored m l 4.00 4.00
Depth to bottom of sand layer m Dus 9.00 9.00
Thickness of Sand Layer m Tus 5.00 5.00
SPT Value sand layer - N 50 17
Angle of internal Friction Degrees 41 33
Angle of wall Friction Degrees 23 23
Data
Angle of wall Friction Rad 0.39 0.39
Tan - tan 0.41 0.41
Depth to water Table m Dw 0 0
Effective overburden pressure in top of sand layer kN/m
2
p
o
' 0 0
Effective overburden pressure in bottom of sand layer 40 40
Average effective overburden pressure in upper sand layer kN/m
2
p
o
'
(avg)
20 20
Shaft Resistance sand layer Qs1 117 117
Bearing Capacity Factor m Nq 150 52
Base Resistance kN Qb 3790 1297
Ultimate Resistance kN Q 3907 1414
Pile Capacity kN q 1563 566


A Summary of bearing capacity is given in Table 8 below.
Table 8 - Summary of Bearing Capacity Analysis
BH
No
Location/
Foundation
Type
Depth
from
River
Bed
m
Width
/Dia
m
Bearing Capacity

Allowable
Bearing capacity
Shear
Criteria
Settlement
Criteria
1 10/2/ pile 9 0.90 1563 kN NA 1550 kN
2

AP 4/0/
Open
5 4. 00 520
kN/m
2

102 kN/m
2

100 kN/m
2

5.00 552
kN/m
2

102 kN/m
2

3 3/5/ Pile 9 0.90 566 kN NA 550 kN

7. PEAK HORIZONTAL ACCELERATION
As per IS 1893 (2002) Nepal lies in the Earthquake zone V. In this zone, the zone factor is 0.36
and the peak horizontal acceleration is given by:

g R
S I Z
A
a
h
* * 2
* *
= 0.14 g
Where,
Z = Zone Factor = 0.36
I = Importance Factor = 1.5
R = Response Reduction Factor = 5 for steel structures
g
S
a
= Average Response acceleration coefficient =2.5

8. DISCUSSIONS
The soil types existing at the site comprise mainly of granular type. A detailed description of soil
types existing at the site is provided in Table 3 in Section 5. The locations of towers lie at the river
crossing. There could be possibility scour to the tower foundation. As a result the foundation
should be placed at least 2 m depth below the depth of maximum scour. At the moment
hydrological data are not available, the maximum depth of scour has been assumed. The bearing
capacity analysis for open has been made using both shear failure and settlement criteria. The
bearing capacity analysis of sandy soil was carried out based on the results of SPT Value.
Terzaghis method was used to determine the bearing capacity from shear failure criteria. The
equation suggested by Peck et al. (1974) has been used to determine bearing capacity on the basis
of settlement criteria. The depths taken in the analysis is 5 m from river bed for open foundation.
For this depth, the widths adopted are 4 m and 5 m.

At locations 10/2 and 3/5 pile foundations have been analyzed. The diameter of pile adopted is
900 mm as per the email by R. K. Das. The depth of pile taken in the analysis is 9 m from the
river bed.



9. RECOMMENDATIONS
On the basis of foundation analysis the following recommendations have been made.
A detailed description of soil types existing at the line foundation site is
provided in Table 3 in Section 5.
The foundation analyzed is an isolated foundation at chainage km 6121 and
location AP 4/0.
The foundation analyzed is a bored and cast in place foundation at chainages km
19375 (location 10/2) and 5097 (location 3/5) respectively.
The depths adopted for open foundation is 5 m from river bed.
For each depth the widths adopted are 4 and 5 m for open foundation.
The diameter for pile foundation taken in the analysis is 900 mm and depth
taken is 9 m from river bed.
The recommended bearing capacities are given in Table 8.
The foundation designer need not follow strictly the depth and dimensions
adopted in the analysis presented in this report. He is free to select any other
dimensions for depth and width depending upon the actual loads and moments
to be transmitted to the foundation soil. At this juncture it is worth mentioning
that the allowable bearing capacity depends on many variables such as allowable
settlement, type of foundation, size and depth of foundation, importance of
structure, cost of project etc. Therefore, on the basis of soil index properties data
and engineering properties data provided in this report (i.e. data furnished in
test result summary sheet Table 2 and bore hole logs presented in
Appendix A), the foundation designer is free to refine the calculations wherever
he feels necessary.

10. REFERENCES
a. Bowles, J. E (1988), Foundation Analysis and Design, 4
th
Edition, McGraw Hill and
Company, USA.
b. Murthy, V. N. S. (1991), Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Vol. II,
Foundation Engineering, Sai Kripa Technical Consultants, Bangalore.
c. Terzaghi, K. and Peck R. B. (1967), Soil Mechanic in Engineering Practice, John Wiley
and Sons Inc. New York, USA.
d. Peck, R. B., Hanson W. E. and Thornburn T. H (1974), Foundation Engineering, Wiley
Eastern Limited, New Delhi.
e. Geotechnical Engineering Investigation Handbook, Earthquakes pp-915
f. IS 1893 (Part 1) 2002, Criteria for earthquake resistance design of structures.
g. Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) 2002. The Study on Earthquake Disaster
Mitigation in the Kathmandu Valley, Kingdom of Nepal.

Borehole Logs
Project : 132 KV Damak-Kabeli Transmission Line Project-Nepal
Location : Loc no. 10/2
Chainage : 19375
Bore Hole No : 1
RL of GWT : 0.30 m
Date : 22nd May 2013 to 25th May 2013
Logged By : Surya Tamang
Prepared By : Manoj Subedi
Checked By : Sandeep Kr. Jha
Certified By : Dr. R. K. Poudel
Scale Depth Thickness Group Soil Value
1=0.50cm Symbol Symbol Depth Type
Each m m m N
0.00
1.50 SPT >50
3.00 3.00 SPT >50
4.50 SPT >50
6.00 6.00 SPT >50
7.50 SPT >50
9.00 9.00 SPT >50
10.50 SPT >50
12.00 12.00 SPT >50
3.00
Gray to brown & white very dense moist sandy
gravels including cobbles
GW
MULTI Lab (P) Ltd.
BORE HOLE LOG
Soil Classification
Sampiling
Gray to brown & white very dense moist
coarse to medium sand including gravels &
cobbles
SW
GW
SW
3.00
3.00
3.00
Gray to white very dense moist sandy gravels
with traces of cobbles
Gray to brown very dense moist gravelly sand
with traces of cobbles
Location : AP 4/0
Chainage : 6121
Bore Hole No : 2
RL of GWT : 0.70 m
Date : 26th May, 2013 to 27th May, 2013
Logged By : Surya Tamang
Each m m m N
0-0.20
1.50 SPT 13
3.00 3.00 SPT 12
4.50 SPT 14
6.00 6.00 SPT 13
Vegetable top soil
MULTI Lab (P) Ltd.
BORE HOLE LOG
Soil Classification
Sampiling
Gray to white medium moist coarse to fine
sand with gravels & silt
SW
SP 2.80
3.00
Gray to brown & white medium moist silty sand
with traces of gravels
Location : Loc no. 3/5
Chainage : 5097
Bore Hole No : 3
Drilling Method : Auger Boring
RL of GWT : 0.30 m
Date : May 27th 2013 to 28th May 2013
Logged By : Surya Tamange
Each m m m N
0.00
1.50 SPT 9
3.00 3.00 SPT 13
4.50 SPT 10
6.00 SPT 15
7.50 SPT 14
9.00 9.00 SPT 16
10.50 SPT 14
12.00 12.00 SPT 15
Gray to brown medium moist silty sand with
traces of pebbles
3.00 SP
Gray to brown medium moist silty sand with
traces of pebbles
SP 3.00
SW 6.00
Gray to brown & white medium moist silt mix
coarse to fine sand with traces of gravels
MULTI Lab (P) Ltd.
BORE HOLE LOG
Soil Classification
Sampiling

DLN Nofa - K - F - LN : Multi Lab (P) LTD

Enviado por

Dados do documento

Descrição original:

Título original

Direitos autorais

Formatos disponíveis

Compartilhar este documento

Compartilhar ou incorporar documento

Opções de compartilhamento

Você considera este documento útil?

Este conteúdo é inapropriado?

Direitos autorais:

Formatos disponíveis

DLN Nofa - K - F - LN : Multi Lab (P) LTD

Enviado por

Direitos autorais:

Formatos disponíveis

June, 2013

132 KV Damak-Kabeli Transmission Line Project-Nepal

Você também pode gostar