If the original of a document or thing can be produced through the exercise of reasonable

diligence, then only the original is admissible ... and no copy can be used as a substitute.
If failure to produce the original is satisfactory explained, secondary evidence is admissible, and
the burden shifts to the party objecting to the secondary evidence (the copy) to show it is not
what it purports to be.
Rule 1003. Admissibility of Duplicates
A duplicate is admissible to the same extent as an original unless (1) a genuine uestion is raised
as to the authenticity of the original or (!) in the circumstances it would be unfair to admit the
duplicate in lieu of the original.
"e (1) genuine uestion as to the authenticity of the original
A document is authenticated when the proponent offers #evidence sufficient to support a finding
that the matter in uestion is what its proponent claims.$ %he burden of proof for authentication
&of documents' is slight. All that is reuired is a foundation from which the fact finder could
legitimately infer that the evidence is what the proponent claims it to be.
McQueeney v. Wilmington Trust Co., (() *.!d )1+ (,d -ir. 1)./)
"e (!) unfair to admit the duplicate in lieu of the original0
1ere speculation or supposition that an original document may have contained information that
the duplicate did not, or vice versa, does not amount to a showing that it would be unfair to admit
the duplicate and thus does not preclude admission of the duplicate under rule 122,. Equico
Lessors, Inc. v. Taks Automotive Service, +.2 3.!d ./4 (-olo. App. 1).4).
A copy of a chec5 was admissible as a duplicate of the original where defendant failed to show
that the original had been tampered with or altered in any way or that the copy was not what it
purported to be. nite! States v Mulinelli"#avas, 111 *.,d )., (1st cir 1)..).
$oyce %roycemit&...' wrote0
I am sending this to the group because it is so well written. I am not endorsing
this product by any stretch of the imagination, but his discourse on the Best
Evidence Rule is very well written, short, and on point. In fact, you could get a lot
worse procedural information on the internet than this attorney produces. At a
minimum, I would suggest getting on his email list. You'll get other emails lie the
one below.
I've left the subscribe lin below at the bottom !ust in case anyone wants to
subscribe. Also, for "#$% you will get more information in the form of their # day
course. Again, I'm not recommending it, but I'm not saying that it isn't a good
value for the money. I've not gotten the course. But, I have gotten these &ips for
some time and he is always dead on with his advice.
Royce
Tips & Tactics
The Best Evidence Rule ...
Winwith Jurisdi ction ary!
6on7t get caught li5e this fellow, trying to get a document into evidence
that isn7t the #best evidence#.
If the other side objects, you7ll lose8
"ule 122! of the *ederal "ules of 9vidence (after which nearly all state
rules of evidence are patterned) states, #%o prove the content of a
writing, recording, or photograph, the original writing, recording, or
photograph is reuired, except as otherwise provided in these rules or by
Act of -ongress.#
%ypically, state rules, such as this one from *lorida, follow suit. #9xcept
as otherwise provided by statute, an original writing, recording, or
photograph is reuired in order to prove the contents of the writing,
recording, or photograph.# "ule )2.)/!, *lorida "ules of 9vidence. :our
state7s evidence rules no doubt have the same provision.
%his is sometimes called the #;est 9vidence "ule# and forms a handy
objection when the other side in your case offers a copy instead of the
original of a document, recording, or photograph.
<uppose your opponent offers a =erox> copy of some alleged cancelled
chec5 in an effort to prove his client paid some bill you claim is due and
owing. :ou object. #?bjection, your @onor. ;est evidence rule.# %he
judge may as5 (or you will), #Ahere is the originalB# If the other side
replies, #?h, it7s bac5 at my client7s office in the company safe,# or, #1y
client7s accountant has the original,# then you renew your objection and
insist that the original be produced or that the copy be excluded as
inadmissible evidence under the best evidence rule. If the other side
claims, #%he original was destroyed, your @onor,# then you ma5e your
record by demanding to 5now details of the circumstances under which
the original was destroyed, since legitimate unavailability of an original
results in the admissibility of a copy under the rule.
In brief, the best evidence rule can be explained this way. If the original
of a document or thing can be produced through the exercise of
reasonable diligence, then only the original is admissible ... and no copy
can be used as a substitute.
If the original has been destroyed or is otherwise no longer available,
even with the exercise of reasonable diligence, then the copy may be
admitted, in spite of the rule. @owever, the copy is still a copy C and, as
such, it does not carry the same weight of proof as would the original.
Do not fail to make this distinction. If the original is not available, and
the court admits a copy, ma5e it clear on the record that the copy is not
an euivalent of the original.
9specially in this present digital age, any schoolchild with a smattering
of computer savvy can create exacting duplicates of almost anything that
can be replicated on ordinary paper .
Dearn more about %he ;est 9vidence "ule in our affordable caseC
winning stepCbyCstep lawsuit selfChelp course.
6on7t get caught with your evidentiary pants down8
%han5s to the internet and u!isdictiona!y " the simple rules and tactics
you need to win your lawsuit are no longer hidden from you by the legal
profession8 Ae ma5e it easy for you to learn how to win in court.
C C C C C C C C
6iscover how easy it is to get for yourself while securing Diberty for
your children. %ens of thousands of others are already enjoying this
power8 Dearn the easy way, with u!isdictiona!y #s self$help cou!se ...
step$by$step to victo!y%
Dearning @ow to Ain in -ourt is no longer expensive or timeC
consuming. %he average .th grader can understand and use what we
ma5e incredibly easyCtoClearn8
&et ou! '$day step$by$step cou!se today. (till only )'1*
EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
As5 anyone who has our course. #Furisdictionary Aor5s8#
+isit ,,,.u!isdictiona!y.com to lea!n mo!e%
EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
?ur !Cday, 4C-6, stepCbyCstep selfChelp course includes0
/Chour narrated video -6 simplifying the entire process of
litigation
! audio -6s that cover practical lawsuit tactics and procedures
1/ lawsuitCsimplifying multimedia tutorials on a 4th -6
Daminated 9asyGuide to the "ules of -ourt
3ostage and @andling included in one affordable price0 H!1)
Ask anyone ,ho has ou! cou!se. (uris!ictionary Works)
(ave le-al fees% .ont!ol /ud-es% Defeat c!ooked la,ye!s%
&et you! competitive ed-e ,ith ou! easy self$help cou!se.
,,,.u!isdictiona!y.com
.all Toll 0!ee fo! details1 233$4a,$Easy
5nte!ested in sellin- u!isdictiona!y cou!ses fo! cash6
<ubstantial discounts available to bul5 buyers.
9mail us for details8
u!isdictiona!y .lubs
Io registration fee8
?ur motto is Justicia Omnibus ... #Fustice for All#
Re-iste! fo! a u!isdictiona!y .lub 7ea! 8ou
Furisdictionary, .1+ 6olphin 6rive, <tuart, *D ,4))+, J<A