''Cultures: human behaviour capabilities subdivided into polarized classes.
The ascetic cultures know the normative difference between perfect and imperfect, the religious cultures between sacred and profane, the aristocratic cultures between highborn and ordinar ! average, the militar cultures between brave and cowardl, the political cultures between powerful and powerless, the administrative cultures between superior and subordinate, the athletic cultures between e"cellence and mediocrit, the economic cultures between abundance and lack, the cognitive cultures between knowledge and ignorance, the wisdom cultures between enlightened and blindness. #hat these distinctions without e"ceptions have in common, is the preference for the first value, which applies in the corresponding field as attractor, while the second pole is alwas the function value of rejection or as avoidance variable.'' $''Culturen: menselijke gedragsmogelijkheden onderverdeeld in gepolariseerde klassen. %o kennen de ascetische culturen het normatieve verschil tussen volkomen en onvolkomen, de religieuze culturen tussen heilig en profaan, de aristocratische culturen tussen voornaam en gewoon, de militaire culturen tussen dapper en laf, de politieke culturen tussen machtig en onmachtig, de bestuurlijke culturen tussen superieur en ondergeschikt, de atletische culturen tussen uitnemendheid en middelmaat, de economische culturen tussen overvloed en gebrek, de cognitieve culturen tussen kennis en onwetendheid, de wijsheids culturen tussen verlichting en verblinding. #at deze onderscheidingen zonder uitzonderingen gemeen hebben, is de voorkeur voor de eerste waarde, die in het betreffende veld as attractor geldt, terwijl de tweede pool altijd de functie van afstotingswaarde of vermijdingsgrootheid heeft.''& 'ual thoughts: (ood ) *vil, +ormal ) ,bnormal, -oral ) .mmoral, /ositive ) +egative. , sheep being killed and eaten b a lion 0 it is positive for the lion, negative for the sheep. , sheep escaping the lion claws 0 the lion will starve and the sheep will live. *ach positive has its negative. +ormative differences in each societ: ,rtistic: ,esthetic ) 1gl -edical: 2ealth ) Sick, Christian: /ious $like a angel& ) 3ebellious $like a devil&, 2edonistic: /leasure ) 4oredom, -ar"ist ! *galitarian: *5ual ) Misshapen... *tcetera, etcetera. +ormative judgments and specializations used to be based upon genetic biological and pschological, average differences between genders, races, classes and circumstances. The were based upon value judgments, comparisons. Toda, due to the inversion of realit $male becomes female, black becomes white, the self0 evident a mster etc.&, these normative differences are in toda's societ, able to survive due to the man0made constructive world, where minds are sheltered from realit and the conse5uences of certain beliefs. There alwas are conse5uences, it is about the degree. That which would have ou 'normall' e"cluded from our tribe in an time, an location, or resulted in our death 0 it is now propagated as ''normal'' or of 'no importance to meddle in'. The inversion of realit 0 a good e"ample is toda's art: 4eaut, is to an e"tent, in the ees of the beholder6 but not on average, not as a whole. 3ecognition of beaut and ugliness are universal. Such as the depictions of health, natural phenomena, a bod developed to its capacit etc., in paintings and statues. ,nd the revulsion for shit, for e"ample, is also applicable in a painting, a photo, a statue: .t simpl is not beautiful. #ithin the man0mad$e& world, trained ''thinking'': 4eaut becomes average, boring, ugl. 1gl becomes beautiful, art, valuable. 7riginalit e5uals value to the modern mind. Certain polarized thoughts within the modern culture of no culture: Tolerant ) 2omophobe. 'ieverse ) #hite, 7ne race ) 3acist, 7pen minded ) /rimitive, /rogressive ) Conservative, *tcetera. .t is alwas about a dual contrast to which one should live up to, and one should avoid the absolute opposite and deem them as an enem or prevent ourself from thinking certain concepts not in line with the desired norm. Choose between societal acceptance and e"clusion, e"orcism. 3egarding the *galitarian ideal.. The dual concept of this ideal, e5ual and misshapen6 the who identif with this ideolog still perceive differences and acknowledge them. 4ut the believe it is all due to oppression and free will that ine5ualit e"ists. *ach person is born according to them, as a tabula rasa, a blank slate. 7nl the circumstances regarding economic status, ancestral privileges and elitist e"clusion are the factors that makes people ine5ual and behave in certain was. 7verall, the mind is blank, to be written on b the 'educators'. /ersons who disagree due to life e"perience, or simpl are 'superior' in intellect and understanding have, according to them, chosen to be different and should accept the conse5uences of societal e"clusion or worse. These *galitarians desire, through technological compensations and economic theft, to lower the high towards the low. That which made a human human in the past, was not about 'being' human, onl that 'being' was stable regarding genetic capabilities, but a constant becoming. 2onour, Chivalr, Self0sacrifice, Self0respect, 8nowledge, $Self&0Consciousness, #ill to power and moulding ourSelf to an higher capacit, the stone inside of us which calls upon constant cuts, hacks and hammering. 'etesting the thought of 'that which . am now, is alread good enough, finished'. Secular0humanists lower evething to the lowest common denominator. Something we all share, something which makes us 'human' as a ''singular specie''. Thus, we are all lowered down to dicks and vaginas, se"ual reproduction. Toda, being human is nothing more than being able to have offspring with each other. The past does not matter anmore, nor does the conse5uences due to technological compensations and e"tensions. The tool used to be the e"tension of the person's capabilities, toda we are the e"tension of the tools 0 men are specialized to use specific tools with no further developments allowed. $'&evolution6 Superior and inferior are concepts relative to the time!space one lives in. ,n .ndividual comparison with added circumstances: , low .9 /gm has a higher chance of survival and procreation than a #hite rocket scientist stranded in his habitat. #e judge the inferiorit of an average Sub0Saharan ,frican mainl due to his!her low intellect, low impulse control, higher testosterone 5uantities etc. #e compare the Sub Saharan populations with the *uropean populations. To our standards the are inferior6 not being able for e"ample to build, develop and maintain a communit ! societ 0 arts, architectural delights, certain music genres, literature. 4ut the judgment of them being inferior as a whole compared to #hites, is a concept constructed b our minds. To be a human, to us, is more than just being able to have offspring with each other, more than the lowest common denominator. The standards regarding being judged as a human has developed over time b the *urasian peoples: .ntellectual capacit, empath, creativit, hormone 5uantities, altruism. The absence of these characteristics in individuals, or amongst certain breeds on average, are people who are inferior to our standards. But nature does not care. ,lthough within the culture of no culture, and the man sub0cultures with their dual concepts on 'right and wrong', 'health and sick' have a devastating influence on our perspectives6 the value of a person is mainl judged b his or her impotent 'potential' regarding educational filtering and economic usabilit. 3ebelliousness such as thinking out of the time!space borders, and in this time, this space6 being conscious thus discriminating, detesting biological sickness and being independent from for e"ample the state, the economic world, governmental food supplies etc., is regarded as worthless to the sstem and societ, non0integratable into the trained, collective hive mind and living standards of desired 'normalit'. Toda's norms and values are the overarching safet sphere of modern comfort6 stabilit.. Tr to break down this comfort, this order, and see what kind of reaction ou will get of the hive minds. The state won't need to act against these ''sick'' individuals directl, but let the social pressure, the public opinion, moulded b the media and educational filtering sstem, do its work. Shaming, slandering and guilt. The super0ego will absorb the ego.. .d: :ibidino, impulsive, short sighted, immediate gratification, basic needs present from birth. *go: Sense of self, consciousness, past awareness, far sighted $patterns ! forethoughtful&. Super0ego: -ore organisms than ourSelf, altruism, self0less0ness for selfish reasons, authorit ! religion ! ideolog ! state ! (od ! super0organism6 rules. The ego is an intermediate between the id and the super0ego6 it has to make compromises between the two. 2ence we follow the rules of toda's societ, in public at least, even though we might not agree with them. ,waiting the temporal anarch..