IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

INNOVATIVE DISPLAY TECHNOLOGIES
LLC

Plaintiff,

v.

ZTE CORPORATION ET AL.


Defendants.




Consolidated
Case No. 2:14-cv-527-JRG

J URY TRIAL DEMANDED




PLAINTIFFS NOTICE
PURSUANT TO STANDING ORDER
REGARDING READINESS FOR SCHEDULING CONFERENCE



Pursuant to the Courts Standing Order, Plaintiff Innovative Display Technologies LLC
(IDT) files this Notice advising the Court that the remaining Defendants in the above-
captioned consolidated case (the ZTE Consolidated Case) have answered. There are no
pending motions to dismiss or transfer in the ZTE Consolidated Case. The member cases and
asserted patents are:

Table 1: ZTE Consolidated Case: member cases

Case No. Case Name Short Reference
2:13-cv-00527 IDT v. ZTE Corporation et al. ZTE case
2:13-cv-00784 IDT v. Nokia Corporation et al. Nokia case
2:14-cv-00146 IDT v. TomTom North America Inc. et al. TomTom case
2:14-cv-00200 IDT v. Toyota Motor Corporation et al. Toyota case
2:14-cv-00202 IDT v. Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. et al. Nissan case
2:14-cv-00222 IDT v. American Honda Motor Co. Inc. et al. Honda case
2:14-cv-00320 IDT v. Google Inc. et al. Google case
Case 2:13-cv-00527-JRG Document 132 Filed 10/03/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 710
2

Table 2: ZTE Consolidated Case: patents-in-suit

Pat. No.
ZTE case
(lead)
Nokia
case
TomTom
case
Toyota
case
Nissan
case
Honda
case
Google
case
6,755,547 x x

x x x x
7,300,194 x x x x x x x
7,384,177 x x x x x x x
7,404,660 x x x x x

x
7,434,974 x x x x x

x
7,537,370 x x x x x
8,215,816 x x x x x x x
7,736,043 x
7,160,015 x
7,963,687 x
8,142,063 x
6,079,838 x
6,508,563 x x x
6,886,956 x x x



RELATED CASES
A. The Acer Consolidated Case
There are five (5) related cases pending in this District which are consolidated under
Innovative Display Technologies LLC (IDT) v. Acer Inc. et al., Case No. 2:13-cv-522 (the
Acer Consolidated Case).
1
In the Acer Consolidated Case, a Markman hearing was held on
J uly 28, 2014 before the Magistrate J udge, whose recommendations are currently on appeal to
the District Court. J ury selection in the Acer Consolidated Case has been set for March 9, 2015.
The member cases and asserted patents in this group are:



1
This case number and style remain as the designation for the consolidation, even though the
action against the specific Acer defendants was dismissed on August 27, 2014.
Case 2:13-cv-00527-JRG Document 132 Filed 10/03/14 Page 2 of 6 PageID #: 711
3

Table 3: Acer Consolidated Case: member cases
Case No. Case Name Short Reference
2:13-cv-00523 IDT v. Dell Inc. Dell case
2:13-cv-00524 IDT v. Hewlett-Packard Company HP case
2:13-cv-00525 IDT v. Huawei Investment and Holding Co. Ltd. et al. Huawei case
2:13-cv-00526 IDT v. BlackBerry Limited et al. BlackBerry case
2:13-cv-00783 IDT v. Microsoft Corporation et al. Microsoft case

Table 4: Acer Consolidated Case: patents-in-suit

Pat. No.
Dell
case
HP
case
Huawei
case
BlackBerry
case
Microsoft
case
6,755,547 x x x x x
7,300,194 x x x x x
7,384,177 x x x x x
7,404,660 x x x x x
7,434,974 x x x x x
7,537,370 x x x x x
8,215,816 x x x x x

All of these patents are also asserted in the ZTE Consolidated Case.


B. The Hyundai Consolidated Case
There are another five (5) related cases pending in this District which are consolidated
under IDT v. Hyundai Motor Company et al., Case No. 2:14-cv-00201-J RG (collectively the
Hyundai Consolidated Case). In the Hyundai Consolidated Cases, a Markman hearing has
been set for April 29, 2015, and jury selection is set to begin on November 9, 2015. A motion to
dismiss in the Sprint member case is pending. The member cases and asserted patents in this
group are:
Table 5: Hyundai Consolidated Case: member cases
Case No. Case Name Short Reference
2:14-cv-00201-J RG IDT v. Hyundai Motor Company et al. Hyundai case
2:14-cv-00720-J RG IDT v. AT&T Inc. et al. AT&T case
2:14-cv-00721-J RG IDT v. Sprint Corporation et al. Sprint case
2:14-cv-00624-J RG IDT v. Mazda Motor Corporation et al. Mazda case
2:14-cv-00535-J RG IDT v. Mercedes-Benz U.S. Intl Inc. et al. Mercedes case
Case 2:13-cv-00527-JRG Document 132 Filed 10/03/14 Page 3 of 6 PageID #: 712
4

Table 6: Hyundai Consolidated Case: patents-in-suit

Pat. No.
Hyundai
case (lead)
AT&T
case
Sprint
case
Mazda
case
Mercedes
case
6,755,547 x x

x x
7,300,194 x x x x x
7,384,177 x x x x x
7,404,660 x x x x x
7,434,974 x x x x x
7,537,370

x x
8,215,816 x x x x x
7,736,043 x
7,160,015 x
7,963,687 x
8,142,063 x
6,079,838 x
6,508,563 x
6,886,956 x
7,914,196 x

All of these patents except Pat. No. 7,914,196 are also asserted in the ZTE Consolidated Case.

C. Unconsolidated Cases
There are two (2) related cases pending in this District which have not been consolidated.
No Markman hearing or trial date has been set in any of the unconsolidated cases, and no Docket
Control Order has been entered. A motion to transfer venue in the BMW member case is
pending. The unconsolidated cases and asserted patents are:
Table 7: Unconsolidated Cases
Case No. Case Name Short Reference
2:14-cv-00106-J RG IDT v. BMW of North America LLC et al. BMW case
2:14-cv-00300-J RG IDT v. Volkswagen AG et al. Volkswagen case


Case 2:13-cv-00527-JRG Document 132 Filed 10/03/14 Page 4 of 6 PageID #: 713
5

Table 8: Unconsolidated Cases: patents-in-suit
Pat. No. BMW Case Volkswagen Case
6,755,547 x x
7,300,194 x x
7,384,177 x x
7,404,660 x x
7,434,974 x x
7,537,370 x

8,215,816 x x
6,508,563 x
6,886,956 x x

All of these patents are also asserted in the ZTE Consolidated Case.
Dated: October 3, 2014 Respectfully submitted,
/s/ Justin B. Kimble (by permission)
J effrey R. Bragalone
Texas Bar No. 02855775
Email: jbragalone@bcpc-law.com
Patrick J . Conroy
Texas Bar No. 24012448
Email: pconroy@bcpc-law.com
J ustin B. Kimble
Email: jkimble@bcpc-law.com
Texas Bar No. 24036909
T. William Kennedy, J r.
Texas Bar No. 24055771
Email: bkennedy@bcpc-law.com
Daniel F. Olejko
Pennsylvania Bar No. 205512
Email: dolejko@bcpc-law.com
Bragalone Conroy PC
2200 Ross Avenue
Suite 4500W
Dallas, TX 75201
Tel: 214-785-6670


T. J ohn Ward J r.
Texas Bar No. 00794818
Email: jw@wsfirm.com
Claire Abernathy Henry
Texas Bar No. 24053063
Email: claire@wsfirm.com
Ward & Smith Law Firm
/s/ George W. Webb III
Demetrios Anaipakos
Texas Bar No. 00793258
Email: danaipakos@azalaw.com
Amir Alavi
Texas Bar No. 00793239
Email: aalavi@azalaw.com
Brian E. Simmons
Email: bsimmons@azalaw.com
Texas Bar No. 24004922
George W. Webb III
Email: gwebb@azalaw.com
Texas Bar No. 24003146
AHMAD, ZAVITSANOS, ANAIPAKOS,
ALAVI & MENSING P.C.
1221 McKinney Street, Suite 3460
Houston, TX 77010
Tel: 713-655-1101


/s/ Michael P. Kella_(by permission)
Anthony G. Simon
Benjamin R. Askew
Timothy D. Krieger
Michael P. Kella
THE SIMON LAW FIRM, P.C.
800 Market Street, Suite 1700
St. Louis, MO 63101
P. 314-241-2929
F. 314-241-2029
Case 2:13-cv-00527-JRG Document 132 Filed 10/03/14 Page 5 of 6 PageID #: 714
6

1127 J udson Road, Suite 220
Longview, TX 75601
Tel: 903-757-6400

asimon@simonlawpc.com
baskew@simonlawpc.com
tkrieger@simonlawpc.com
mkella@simonlawpc.com

Attorneys for Plaintiff INNOVATIVE DISPLAY TECHNOLOGIES LLC



CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned hereby certifies that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing
document was filed electronically in compliance with the Local Rules CV-5(a). As such, this
document was served on all counsel of record pursuant to Local Rules CV-5(a)(3)(A) and the
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure on October 3, 2014.
/s/ George W. Webb III
George W. Webb III

Case 2:13-cv-00527-JRG Document 132 Filed 10/03/14 Page 6 of 6 PageID #: 715