Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
C
reaction temperature.
2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
Biodiesel also called fatty acid methyl ester is a clean-burning,
renewable fuel produced from vegetable oils, animal fats and
recycledcookingoil andgreases, etc. It is not onlybiodegradablebut
also free of sulfur, making it a cleaner burning fuel than petroleum
diesel withreducedemissionof SOx, CO, unburnt hydrocarbons and
particulate matter [1]. Excellent lubricating properties that extend
engine life, superior cetane number, ash point compared to con-
ventional diesel and acceptable cold lter plugging point (CFPP) are
some of the attributes that make biodiesel very attractive alterna-
tive fuel [2,3].
The major hurdle in the use of biodiesel for replacing conven-
tional petroleumfuels is its higher cost. The two main factors that
affect the cost of biodiesel are the cost of raw materials and the
processingcost suchas catalysts andequipments [4]. Therawmate-
rials account for over 6075% of the biodiesel production expenses.
The potential solution to this problemis the utilization of lowvalue
alternative feedstocks of varying type, quality and cost. For exam-
ple, the cost of waste cooking oil is 23 times lower than virgin
oils. Thus the utilization of less expensive feedstocks such as ani-
mal fat, waste cooking oil, yellowand brown grease is expected to
Corresponding author. Tel.: +1 336 334 7564x107; fax: +1 336 334 7417.
E-mail address: adewuyi@ncat.edu (Y.G. Adewuyi).
appreciably reduce the biodiesel cost [5]. However, many of these
alternative feedstocks may contain high levels of free fatty acids
(FFA), water, or insoluble matter, which affect biodiesel production
[6]. Synthesis of biodiesel via transestericationreactionwithfeed-
stocks having higher FFA and moisture is complicated. During the
reaction, the feedstocks undergo saponication reaction leading to
soaps formation resulting in reduced biodiesel yields, especially
when alkaline catalysts are used. Furthermore, the soap formation
also leads to the catalyst consumption, lowering catalytic efciency
and increase in the viscosity of reaction mixture and gel formation
requiring additional purication steps [5]. These problems could
potentially be eliminated via the use of heterogeneous acid cata-
lysts due to their lower susceptibility to FFAs and moisture content
in the oil [7]. Also, catalysts can be easily separated fromthe reac-
tion products with much more simplied product separation steps
resulting in high yields of methyl esters and decrease of catalyst
cost due to the possibility of catalyst regeneration.
To date, several solid acid catalysts have been reported for
biodiesel synthesis, including zeolites (e.g. H-ZSM-5, Y and Beta),
ion exchange resins (e.g. Amberlist 12, a styrene based sul-
fonic acid and Naon-NR-50, a copolymer of tetrauoroethene
and peruoro-2-(uorosulphonyle-thoxy) propyl vinyl ether) and
metal oxides modied with sulfate ions (SO
4
2
/M
x
O
y
, such as
SO
4
2
/ZrO
2
, SO
4
2
/SnO
2
, SO
4
2
/TiO
2
, SO
4
2
/WO
3
), etc. [8,9]. Zeo-
lite catalysts with small (micron-sized) pores are not suitable for
biodiesel manufacture because of the diffusion limitations induced
0926-860X/$ see front matter 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2013.05.005
V.G. Deshmane, Y.G. Adewuyi / Applied Catalysis A: General 462463 (2013) 196206 197
by the large fatty acid molecules. Ion-exchange resins are active
strong acids, but have a low thermal stability which is problem-
atic as the esterication reaction might require high temperatures.
Metal oxides modied with sulfate ions and especially sulfated
zirconia, has high boiling point, strength, toughness, good cor-
rosion resistant in acidic and alkaline environment. In addition
sulfated zirconia has very high activity, selectivity and stability
making it a promising candidate not only for the estericationreac-
tion but also for number of industrially important reactions such
as hydrocarbon isomerization, methanol conversion to hydrocar-
bons, alkylation, acylation, etherication, condensation, nitration,
cyclization and FisherTropsch synthesis [1012]. However, the
catalytic and structural properties of the sulfated zirconia depends
on number of factors including Zr(OH)
2
preparation method, pre-
cursor used, precipitation pH, precursor concentration, type of
sulfonating agent, catalyst pretreatment, and calcination [1315].
In an earlier work, nanocrystalline mesoporous Zr(OH)
2
pow-
der with very high surface area was synthesized using ethylene
diamine and zirconyl chloride octahydrate. Ethylene diamine used
as precipitating agent also acted as a colloidal protecting agent.
The results of the effects of various process parameters such as
precipitation pH, precursor concentration, time of hydrothermal
treatment and calcination temperature on the structural and tex-
tual properties of zirconiumoxide were discussed in detail [16].
Yadav and Murkute [17] previously reported the use of chloro-
sulfonic for the sulfonation of zirconia powder. It was showed that
the chorosulfonic acid treated zirconia possesses more sulfate ions,
stability and activity compared to the sulfated zirconia synthesized
using sulfuric acid. In this study we report the synthesis of meso-
porous nanocrystalline sulfated zirconia with high surface area
and acidity. Mesoporous zirconium hydroxide prepared at differ-
ent digestion times of 0, 1, 3, 6, 12, 24 and 48h were sulfonated
by wet impregnation method using sulfuric acid and chlorosul-
fonic acid as two different sulfonating agents. To the best of our
knowledge, nostudies have beenreportedinthe literature showing
the effect of digestion/hydrothermal treatment on the sulfonation
process and acidity of nal sulfated zirconia catalyst. The effect of
preparation conditions such as digestion time, sulfonating agent
and the calcination temperature on the structural phases, textu-
ral characteristics and the number and types of available active
acidic sites on the surface of the nal sulfated zirconia were inves-
tigated using nitrogen adsorptiondesorption (BET), ammonia
temperature programmed desorption (NH
3
-TPD), X-ray diffraction
(XRD), thermogravimetry and differential scanning calorimetry
(TGADSC), and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR).
The sulfated zirconia prepared at the best synthesis conditions was
tested for the esterication of free fatty acid in soybean oil (pre-
pared by mixing oleic acid in soybean oil) as model reaction.
2. Experimental
2.1. Chemicals
Zirconyl chloride octahydrate (ZrOCl
2
8H
2
O), 98+% pure,
ethylenediamine (H
2
NCH
2
CH
2
NH
2
), 99%, extra pure, sulfuric acid,
97%, ethylene dichloride were purchased fromAcros Organics, NJ,
USA. Chlorosulfonic acid, 99% was obtained fromAlfa Aesar, Ward
Hill, USA. The water used at all stages of the experiments was puri-
edusing a Mill-QAdvantage A10 withElix 5 systemobtainedfrom
Millipore Corporation (Bedford, MA, USA).
2.2. Catalyst synthesis
The method for the synthesis of zirconium hydroxide (8090%
yield) has been discussed in details previously [16]. Zirconyl
chloride octahydrate and ethylene diamine are used as zirco-
nium precursor and precipitating agent, respectively, as reported
by Dsouza et al. [18]. Sulfated zirconia was prepared from this
material using two different methods based upon two different
sulfonating agents, i.e., sulfuric acid and chlorosulfonic acid. In the
case of sulfuric acid, 1g of the dried again as prepared zirconium
hydroxide power was mixed with 15ml of 1N H
2
SO
4
and then
stirredwithmagnetic stirrer for about 10min followedbythe ltra-
tion and air drying. The air dried material was then dried in oven
for 24h at 110
C. The sam-
ples prepared by using both methods were then calcined at 600
C
and 650
C/min and 1
C at 20
Candsaturatedwithammoniabyexpos-
ing the sample to 100% NH
3
for 10min. Physisorbed ammonia was
removed by purging the sample withheliumgas for 30min. Finally,
the temperature was ramped to 600
C at a rate of 20
C/min and
evolvedammonia was quantiedby thermal conductivity detector.
Thermo-gravimetric (TGA) and differential scanning calorime-
try analysis (DSC) were carried out using a SDT Q600 V20.4 Build
14 system(TA Instruments, NewCastle, DE, USA). The heating was
carried out in an air environment. The air owrate was maintained
at 100ml/min and the heating rate was 10
C/min.
Infrared absorptiontransmission spectra were obtained using
an FTIR spectrometer (TENSOR 27, Bruker Optics, Inc., Billerica,
MA) with HeNe laser source and a room-temperature deuterated l-
alanine triglycine sulfate detector (DLATGS detector). The FTIR was
equipped with an ATR sampling accessory, MIRacle ATR set with
Diamond crystal assembly fromPIKE Technologies (PIKE Technolo-
gies, Inc., Madison, WI). All spectra were collected at 201
C using
an average of 16 scans and with a spectral resolution of 2cm
1
.
The background spectra were obtained using a clean ATR accessory
with a continuous dry, CO
2
-free air purge from a laboratory gen-
erator (Parker-Balston, Haverhill, MA) to remove moisture. During
the analysis, a small amount of powderedsample was placedonthe
crystal and pressured with high pressure clamp to get the intimate
contact between the sample and crystal surface.
198 V.G. Deshmane, Y.G. Adewuyi / Applied Catalysis A: General 462463 (2013) 196206
0 200 400 600 800 1000
75
80
85
90
95
100 0 h
1 h
3 h
6 h
12 h
24 h
48 h
Temperature (C)
W
e
i
g
h
t
(
%
)
-2.0
-1.5
-1.0
-0.5
0.0
0.5
H
e
a
t
F
l
o
w
(
W
/
g
)
Fig. 1. TGADSC plot for the zirconium hydroxide prepared at different digestion
times.
The XRDpatterns were recorded on D8 DISCOVER X-ray diffrac-
tometer fromBruker (Bruker Optics, Inc., Billerica, MA) with a PSD
detector using Cu K radiation generated at 40mA and 40kV at
the scanning rate of 0.01
C tem-
perature. The cooled sample was then centrifuged to separate the
solid catalyst fromthe liquid reaction mixture. Approximately, 1g
of the separated liquid phase was dissolved in 5ml of 2-propanol
to make a homogeneous solution which was then titrated against
0.05N KOH solution in the presence of phenolphthalein indicator
to determine the acid value (mg of KOH required to neutralize 1g
of the sample).
3. Results and discussion
3.1. TGADSC
The TGADSC plots for the zirconiumhydroxide prepared at dif-
ferent digestion times (048h) are shown in Fig. 1. Two weight
0 200 400 600 800 1000
80
85
90
95
100
105
110
115
W
e
i
g
h
t
(
%
)
Temperature (C)
48 h
24 h
12 h
6 h
3 h
1 h
0 h
(a)
0 200 400 600 800 1000
-2.0
-1.5
-1.0
-0.5
0.0
H
e
a
t
F
l
o
w
(
W
/
g
)
Temperature (C)
48 h
24 h
12 h
6 h
3 h
1 h
0 h
(b)
Fig. 2. Sulfated zirconia prepared using sulfuric acid with different digestion times
(a) TGA (b) DSC.
loss stages were observed in the TGA prole with rst one located
below150
C and 500
C for 3h
and 635701
C showed
highest catalytic activity for n-hexane isomerization reaction. A
high sulfur concentration and co-existence of S
4+
and S
6+
over
amorphous material was observedfor thesulfatedzirconiacalcined
at temperature below 500
C tem-
peratures are favorable for the formation of highly active sulfated
zirconia catalyst [11,2830]. Fig. 4 shows the XRD patterns of the
sulfated zirconia prepared from zirconium hydroxide synthesized
withdigestiontimes rangingfrom0hto48h, usingsulfuric acidand
chlorosulfonic acid as two different sulfonating agents; calcined at
600
C and 650
C,
material was found to be crystallized with 100% tetragonal phase
structure, however lower crystallinity was observed for materials
digested for 3h and 6h.
When chlorosulfonic acid was used, 100% tetragonal structure
was obtained upon calcination at 600
Cand
650
and SO
4
2
fromwater sensitive SO
3
groups. This could also be one
of the reasons for the observed disappearance of sulfate peaks for
calcined SZ and CSZ samples in the present study.
3.4. Ammonia TPD studies
Temperature programmed desorption (TPD) of ammonia was
used to measure the total acid strength and the acid sites distribu-
tion on the surface of sulfated zirconia. Fig. 7 shows the acid sites
distribution for the SZ prepared from zirconium hydroxide syn-
thesized at 1, 3 and 6h and calcined at 600
C and 650
C. It was
observed that for all three digestion times and for both calcination
temperatures, SZ exhibit two peaks, at about 300
C and 600
C.
The CSZ calcined at 600
C temperature.
Material Digestion time
(h)
Surface area
(m
2
/g)
Pore volume
(cm
3
/g)
Avg. pore size
(nm)
Zirconia 3 141.6 0.1415 3.996
SZ 1 114.1 0.0965 3.381
3 149.0 0.1306 3.507
6 165.5 0.1492 3.606
12 158.8 0.1546 3.892
24 177.6 0.1845 4.157
48 176.5 0.1807 4.096
CSZ 1 18.02 0.0664 14.74
3 20.93 0.0778 14.71
6 23.73 0.0881 14.85
12 18.90 0.0516 10.91
24 20.98 0.0523 9.982
48 20.07 0.0478 9.528
2400 2200 2000 1800 1600 1400 1200 1000 800 600
0.75
0.80
0.85
0.90
0.95
1.00
1.05
1.10
T
r
a
n
s
m
i
t
t
a
n
c
e
(
%
)
Wavenumber (cm
-1
)
48 h
24 h
12 h
6 h
3 h
1 h
0 h
(a)
2400 2200 2000 1800 1600 1400 1200 1000 800 600
0.90
0.95
1.00
1.05
1.10
T
r
a
n
s
m
i
t
t
a
n
c
e
(
%
)
Wavenumber (cm
-1
)
48 h
24 h
12 h
6 h
3 h
1 h
0 h
(b)
2400 2200 2000 1800 1600 1400 1200 1000 800 600
0.80
0.85
0.90
0.95
1.00
1.05
1.10
T
r
a
n
s
m
i
t
t
a
n
c
e
(
%
)
Wavenumber (cm
-1
)
48 h
24 h
12 h
6 h
3 h
1 h
0 h
(c)
Fig. 5. FTIR spectra of sulfated zirconia prepared using sulfuric acid with different digestion times and calcined at (a) 110
C (b) 600
C (c) 650
C.
in the temperature range of 156200
C, 280300
C, 380400
C,
and 560600
C to 650
C and 480
C
demonstrates the presence of superacidic sites on the surface of
zirconia [14]. By comparing Fig. 7 and Fig. 8, it can also be observed
that the CSZ possesses more superacidic sites compared to the SZ.
The quantitative measurement of total acid sites for the SZ and CSZ
prepared at various digestion times and calcination temperature
is depicted in Fig. 9. It is observed that, for both SZ and CSZ, the
total number of acids sites initially increased when digestion time
202 V.G. Deshmane, Y.G. Adewuyi / Applied Catalysis A: General 462463 (2013) 196206
2400 2200 2000 1800 1600 1400 1200 1000 800 600
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
1.1
1.2
T
r
a
n
s
m
i
t
t
a
n
c
e
(
%
)
Wavenumber (cm
-1
)
48 h
24 h
12 h
6 h
3 h
1 h
0 h
(a)
2400 2200 2000 1800 1600 1400 1200 1000 800 600
0.75
0.80
0.85
0.90
0.95
1.00
1.05
1.10
T
r
a
n
s
m
i
t
t
a
n
c
e
(
%
)
Wavenumber (cm
-1
)
48 h
24 h
12 h
6 h
3 h
1 h
0 h
(b)
2400 2200 2000 1800 1600 1400 1200 1000 800 600
0.80
0.85
0.90
0.95
1.00
1.05
1.10
T
r
a
n
s
m
i
t
t
a
n
c
e
(
%
)
Wavenumber (cm
-1
)
48 h
24 h
12 h
6 h
3 h
1 h
0 h
(c)
Fig. 6. FTIR spectra of sulfated zirconia prepared using chlorosulfonic acid with different digestion times and calcined at (a) 110
C (b) 600
C (c) 650
C.
increased from0 to 3h but then observed to decrease with further
increase in digestion time to 24h. Upon more increase in diges-
tion time to 48h, the acid sites were seen to increase again by a
small number. Similar observation was made about the XRD peak
intensities for the sulfated zirconia samples prepared at different
digestion times (Fig. 4c and d) wherein lower XRD peak intensities
were observed for 3h and 6h digested samples. These observa-
tions can be explained on the basis of the effect of digestion time on
surfaceareaandhydroxyl groups onthesurfaceof hydrous zirconia.
Chen et al. [37] demonstrated the importance of surface OH
groups for the formation of sulfated zirconia. They suggested that
the formation of sulfated zirconia is a two step process. In the
rst step sulfate group displaces the surface OH group and upon
calcination acid sites are formed through oxolation process form-
ing stronger chemical bonds [38]. In an earlier work [16], we
demonstrated that the process of digestion leads to an extensive
polymerization through the condensation of the hydroxyl groups
in the hydrous zirconia to formordered three-dimensional porous
structure with greater thermal stability. Thus an increase in diges-
tion time inuences both the surface hydroxyl groups as well as the
surface area of the material. As the digestiontime increases the sur-
face areas increases at the expense of surface OH groups which are
important for the anchoring of sulfate groups during the sulfona-
tion process. On the other hand, more surface area provides more
distributed anchoring sites for unhindered attachment of sulfate
groups. Thus, with lower digestion time we have more OH groups
but low surface area and at higher digestion times we have less
OH groups but higher surface area, which explains the observation
made about the variations in crystallinity in the XRD analysis and
the existence of optimum number of acid sites for 3h digestion
time.
3.5. Nitrogen adsorptiondesorption
The nitrogen adsorptiondesorption isotherms for the zirconia,
SZ and CSZ prepared with 3h digestion time and calcined at 600
C
temperature are shown in Fig. 10. The isotherms resemble the type
IV isotherms with hysteresis loop of type H2 based on IUPAC clas-
sication [39]. The hysteresis loop is associated with the capillary
condensation taking place in the mesopores signifying existence of
mesoporous structure in the calcined sulfated zirconia. The type H2
hysteresis loop is attributed to the ink-bottle shaped pores (pores
with narrownecks and wide bodies). Table 1 presents the values of
surface area, pore volume and average pore sizes of the SZ and CSZ
prepared with various digestion times calcined at 600
C tempera-
ture. A slightly higher surface area was observed upon sulfonation
using sulfuric acid compared to the non-sulfated zirconia. This sup-
ports the observation made in the TGADSC studied wherein delay
in the crystallization temperature was observed upon sulfonation.
The surface area was also observed to increase with increase in
digestion time. Several reports have suggested that the introduc-
tion of sulfate anions disturbs the transition of amorphous phase to
V.G. Deshmane, Y.G. Adewuyi / Applied Catalysis A: General 462463 (2013) 196206 203
-200 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000
100
200
300
400
500
600
Temperature
Signal
Time (sec)
T
e
m
p
e
r
a
t
u
r
e
(
o
C
)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
T
C
D
S
i
g
n
a
l
(
m
V
)
(a) SZ-1_600
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800
100
200
300
400
500
600
Temperature
Signal
Time (sec)
T
e
m
p
e
r
a
t
u
r
e
(
o
C
)
(b) SZ-1_650
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
T
C
D
S
i
g
n
a
l
(
m
V
)
0 400 800 1200 1600 2000
100
200
300
400
500
600
Temperature
Signal
Time (sec)
T
e
m
p
e
r
a
t
u
r
e
(
o
C
)
(c) SZ-3_600
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
T
C
D
S
i
g
n
a
l
(
m
V
)
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800
100
200
300
400
500
600
Temperature
Signal
Time (sec)
T
e
m
p
e
r
a
t
u
r
e
(
o
C
)
(d) SZ-3_650
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
T
C
D
S
i
g
n
a
l
(
m
V
)
0 400 800 1200 1600 2000
100
200
300
400
500
600
Temperature
Signal
Time (sec)
T
e
m
p
e
r
a
t
u
r
e
(
o
C
)
(e) SZ-6_600
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
T
C
D
S
i
g
n
a
l
(
m
V
)
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800
100
200
300
400
500
600
Temperature
Signal
Time (sec)
T
e
m
p
e
r
a
t
u
r
e
(
o
C
)
(f) SZ-6_650
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
T
C
D
S
i
g
n
a
l
(
m
V
)
Fig. 7. NH
3
TPD of sulfated zirconia prepared using sulfuric acid and zirconia prepared with digestion times and calcination temperature of (a) 1h, 600
C (c)
3 h, 600
C, respectively.
crystalline phase and the extent of delay in transition depends on
the concentration of active sulfate species on the zirconia surface
[13]. Thus it can be concluded that the time of digestion certainly
has the inuence on the number of active sulfate sites on the zir-
conia surface. A drastic reduction in the surface area and pore
volume and increase in the average pore size was observed upon
sulfonation using chlorosulfonic acid. The shift of the hysteresis
loop toward the higher relative pressures signies the formation of
bigger pores at expense of breaking of smaller pores. This could be
due to the destruction of mesoporous structure of hydrous zirco-
nia caused by the highly corrosive action of the chlorosulfonic acid
[32,40].
3.6. Catalysts performance for esterication reaction
The catalytic activity of the prepared SZ and CSZ catalysts syn-
thesized with digestion time of 1, 3, 6, 12, 24 and 48h and calcined
at 600
C
(c) 3h, 600
C, respectively.
catalyst preparation parameters on the rate of reaction and %
conversion, all reaction parameters were kept constant at 60
C
reaction temperature, methanol/oil molar ratio of 9:1 and 2% cat-
alyst concentration. The leaching test of the catalyst was carried
out in methanol and also in the reaction mixture (without oleic
acid) by following the procedure reported by Suwannakarn et al.
[41]. It was observed that both SZ and CSZ did not show any
leaching into the methanol or reaction mixture. Figs. 11 and 12
summarize the results obtained for catalytic activity of SZ and CSZ
in the esterication reaction. The results suggest that the type of
sulfonating agent has strong inuence on the catalytic activity of
the sulfated zirconia. In the case of SZ, maximum conversion of
22.49% was obtained at the end of 80min whereas for the same
reaction time it was 84.33% conversion for CSZ. The signicantly
higher activity of the CSZ even after having relatively lower sur-
face area compared to the SZ is attributed to existence of more
superacidic sites on the surface of CSZ as discussed earlier, hence,
resulting in higher conversion. The digestion time of zirconia was
also observed to inuence the rate of reaction and the nal con-
version of oleic acid for both SZ and CSZ. The sulfated zirconia
prepared from hydrous zirconia synthesized at 3h digestion time
showed higher esterication activity compared to the hydrous
zirconia synthesized at other digestion times. These results con-
rm the observance of more number of total acidic sites for 3h
V.G. Deshmane, Y.G. Adewuyi / Applied Catalysis A: General 462463 (2013) 196206 205
Fig. 9. Variation of total number of acid sites (mol/g) with respect to digestion
time and sulfonating agent on the surface of sulfated zirconia calcined at 600
C and
650
C temperature.
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
120
130
140
150
SZ
CSZ
D
A
V
o
l
u
m
e
[
c
c
/
g
]
P/Po
Zirconia
Fig. 10. Nitrogenadsorptiondesorptionisothermfor zirconia, SZ and CSZ prepared
at 3h digestion time. A: adsorption, D: desorption.
Fig. 11. Conversion vs time plot for SZ prepared at different digestion times for
oleic acid estericationreaction. Methanol/acid oil: 9/1, temperature: 60
C, catalyst
loading: 2% (wt % of acid oil).
Fig. 12. Conversion vs time plot for CSZ prepared at different digestion times for
oleic acid estericationreaction. Methanol/acid oil: 9/1, temperature: 60
C, catalyst
loading: 2% (wt % of acid oil).
digested sample compared to 1 and 6h which is demonstrated in
Fig. 9.
4. Conclusions
The hydrous zirconia prepared with different hydrothermal
treatment times was used to synthesize the sulfated zirconia solid
acidcatalyst usingsulfuric acidandchlorosulfonic acids as sulfonat-
ing agents. The digestion time and the type of sulfonating agents
were found to have signicant inuence on structural, textural and
catalytic properties of the prepared sulfated zirconia catalyst. The
sample prepared with 3h digestion time was observed to possess
the highest number of total acid sites. For the esterication of
oleic acid in soybean oil, the CSZ catalyst prepared with 3h diges-
tion time and 600
C
reaction temperature. The higher catalytic activity of CSZ though
with signicantly lower surface area compared to SZ is attributed
to the presence of higher surface superacidic sites compared with
SZ.
Acknowledgements
The authors acknowledge the funding received from National
Science Foundation (NSF) for the nancial assistance via Award
CBET 0651811. The authors are also grateful to the College of
Engineering at North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State Uni-
versity(NCAT) for partial support for this project. The authors thank
the Center for Advanced Materials and Smart Structures (CAMSS)
at NCAT for the use of their XRD for material characterization.
Appendix A. Supplementary data
Supplementary data associated with this article can be
found, in the online version, at http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/
j.apcata.2013.05.005.
References
[1] A. Demirbas, Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 31 (2005) 466487.
[2] M.S. Graboski, R.L. McCormick, Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 24 (1998) 125164.
[3] K. Bozbas, Renew. Sust. Energy Rev. 12 (2008) 542552.
[4] F. Ma, M.A. Hanna, Biores. Technol. 70 (1999) 115.
[5] I. Atadashi, M. Aroua, A. Abdul Aziz, N. Sulaiman, Renew. Sust. Energy Rev. 16
(2012) 32753285.
[6] B.R. Moser, In Vitro Cell Dev. Biol.-Plant 45 (2011) 229266.
[7] E. Lotero, Y. Liu, D.E. Lopez, K. Suwannakarn, D.A. Bruce, J.G. Goodwin Jr., Ind.
Eng. Chem. Res. 44 (2005) 53535363.
206 V.G. Deshmane, Y.G. Adewuyi / Applied Catalysis A: General 462463 (2013) 196206
[8] M.E. Borges, L. Daz, Renewable, Sustain. Energy Rev. 16 (2012) 28392849.
[9] K. Nuithitikul, J. Limtrakul, Int. J. Chem. React. Eng. 10 (2012) 129.
[10] A.A. Kiss, A.C. Dimian, G. Rothenberg, Adv. Synth. Catal. 348 (2006) 7581.
[11] G.D. Yadav, J.J. Nair, Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 33 (1999) 148.
[12] B.M. Reddy, M.K. Patil, ChemInform40 (2009) 21862208.
[13] T. Yamaguchi, K. Tanabe, K. Yao Chin, Mater. Chem. Phys. 16 (1987) 6777.
[14] A. Corma, V. Fornes, M. Juan-Rajadell, J. Nieto, Appl. Catal. A: Gen. 116 (1994)
151163.
[15] D. Farcasiu, J.Q. Li, Appl. Catal. A: Gen. 128 (1995) 97105.
[16] V.G. Deshmane, Y.G. Adewuyi, Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 148 (2011)
88100.
[17] G.D. Yadav, A.D. Murkute, J. Catal. 224 (2004) 218223.
[18] L. DSouza, A. Suchopar, K. Zhu, D. Balyozova, M. Devadas, R.M. Richards, Micro-
porous Mesoporous Mater. 88 (2006) 2230.
[19] E.P. Barrett, L.G. Joyner, P.P. Halenda, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 73 (1951) 373380.
[20] A.L. Patterson, Phys. Rev. 56 (1939) 978982.
[21] A. Cleareld, Inorg. Chem. 3 (1964) 146148.
[22] Q.H. Xia, K. Hidajat, S. Kawi, J. Catal. 205 (2002) 318331.
[23] M. Hino, M. Kurashige, H. Matsuhashi, K. Arata, Thermochim. Acta 441 (2006)
3541.
[24] R. Srinivasan, R.A. Keogh, D.R. Milburn, B.H. Davis, J. Catal. 153 (1995) 123130.
[25] R.A. Comelli, S.A. Canavese, S.R. Vaudagna, N.S. Fgoli, Appl. Catal. A: Gen. 135
(1996) 287299.
[26] X. Li, K. Nagaoka, R. Olindo, J.A. Lercher, J. Catal. 238 (2006) 3945.
[27] T. Yamaguchi, T. Jin, K. Tanabe, J. Phys. Chem. 90 (1986) 31483152.
[28] C. Guo, S. Yao, J. Cao, Z. Qian, Appl. Catal. A: Gen. 107 (1994) 229238.
[29] C. Morterra, G. Cerrato, M. Signoretto, Catal. Lett. 41 (1996) 101109.
[30] M. Tran, N. Gnep, G. Szabo, M. Guisnet, Appl. Catal. A: Gen. 171 (1998) 207217.
[31] J.R. Sohn, H.W. Kim, J. Mol. Catal. 52 (1989) 361374.
[32] J. Laizet, A. Soiland, J. Leglise, J. Duchet, Top. Catal. 10 (2000) 8997.
[33] D.A. Ward, E.I. Ko, J. Catal. 150 (1994) 1833.
[34] D. Sarkar, D. Mohapatra, S. Ray, S. Bhattacharyya, S. Adak, N. Mitra, Cer. Int. 33
(2007) 12751282.
[35] F. Babou, G. Coudurier, J.C. Vedrine, J. Catal. 152 (1995) 341349.
[36] A. Corma, H. Garcia, Catal. Today 38 (1997) 257308.
[37] F.R. Chen, G. Coudurier, J.F. Joly, J.C. Vedrine, J. Catal. 143 (1993) 616626.
[38] C.R. Vera, J.M. Parera, J. Catal. 166 (1997) 254262.
[39] K.S.W. Sing, D.H. Everett, R.A.W. Haul, L. Moscou, R.A. Pierotti, J. Rouquerol, T.
Siemieniewska, Pure Appl. Chem. 57 (1985) 603619.
[40] J. Mass, A.G. Mayer, Chlorosulfonic Acid in Ullmanns Encyclopedia of Industrial
Chemistry, Wiley, NewYork, USA, 2005.
[41] K. Suwannakarn, E. Lotero, J.G. Goodwin Jr., C. Lu, J. Catal. 255 (2008) 279286.