Pile Foundation Design

© All Rights Reserved

48 visualizações

Pile Foundation Design

© All Rights Reserved

- Modelling the Behaviour of Piled Raft
- Geotechnical Engineering Lab Report 2
- Geotechnical Investigation Report of Burj Khalifa
- QCS 2007 0406.pdf
- Ground Engineering for the Autoroute 30 PPP Project in Montreal, Quebec Canada
- XPIP STE03020 Guidelines for Tank Fdn Designs
- 237977567 Pile Design Calculation
- Micro Piles by Andrew Brengola
- graha96a
- Tpr ProposedSeismicDetailingCriteriaPiersWharves
- Analysis of Laterally Loaded Piles in Multilayered Soil Deposits
- Metodos
- Foundation Engineering ICE
- Method for Prediction of Micropile Resistance for Slope Stabilization.pdf
- Laterally Loaded Pile
- Lecture13-Analisis-of-Single-Piles.pdf
- Daily Program June-2011
- 2012 Product Catalog Compressed
- July_2015_1435734432__1622.rtf
- 25-04-2016 dcr

Você está na página 1de 42

Student Guide

Introduction to pile foundations

Objectives: Texts dealing with geotechnical and ground engineering techniques classify piles in

a number of ways. The objective of this unit is that in order to help the undergraduate student

understand these classifications using materials extracted from several sources, this chapter

gives an introduction to pile foundations.

1.1 Pile foundations

Pile foundations are the part of a structure used to carry and transfer the load of the structure to

the bearing ground located at some depth below ground surface. The main components of the

foundation are the pile cap and the piles. Piles are long and slender members which transfer the

load to deeper soil or rock of high bearing capacity avoiding shallow soil of low bearing capacity

The main types of materials used for piles are Wood, steel and concrete. Piles made from these

materials are driven, drilled or jacked into the ground and connected to pile caps. epending

upon type of soil, pile material and load transmitting characteristic piles are classified

accordingly. !n the following chapter we learn about, classifications, functions and pros and cons

of piles.

1.2 Historical

Pile foundations have been used as load carrying and load transferring systems for many years.

!n the early days of civilisation"#$, from the communication, defence or strategic point of view

villages and towns were situated near to rivers and lakes. !t was therefore important to

strengthen the bearing ground with some form of piling.

Timber piles were driven in to the ground by hand or holes were dug and filled with sand and

stones.

!n %&'( )hristoffoer Polhem invented pile driving equipment which resembled to days pile driving

mechanism. *teel piles have been used since %+(( and concrete piles since about %,((.

The industrial revolution brought about important changes to pile driving system through the

invention of steam and diesel driven machines.

-ore recently, the growing need for housing and construction has forced authorities and

development agencies to exploit lands with poor soil characteristics. This has led to the

development and improved piles and pile driving systems. Today there are many advanced

techniques of pile installation.

1.3 Function of piles

.s with other types of foundations, the purpose of a pile foundations is/

to transmit a foundation load to a solid ground

to resist vertical, lateral and uplift load

. structure can be founded on piles if the soil immediately beneath its base does not have

adequate bearing capacity. !f the results of site investigation show that the shallow soil is

unstable and weak or if the magnitude of the estimated settlement is not acceptable a pile

foundation may become considered. 0urther, a cost estimate may indicate that a pile foundation

may be cheaper than any other compared ground improvement costs.

!n the cases of heavy constructions, it is likely that the bearing capacity of the shallow soil will not

be satisfactory, and the construction should be built on

pile foundations. Piles can also be used in normal ground conditions to resist hori1ontal loads.

Piles are a convenient method of foundation for works over water, such as jetties or bridge piers.

1.4 Classification of piles

1.4.1 Classification of pile with respect to load transmission and functional behaviour

2nd bearing piles 3point bearing piles4

0riction piles 3cohesion piles 4

)ombination of friction and cohesion piles

1.4.2 End bearing piles

These piles transfer their load on to a firm stratum located at a considerable depth below the

base of the structure and they derive most of their carrying capacity from the penetration

resistance of the soil at the toe of the pile 3see figure %.%4. The pile behaves as an ordinary

column and should be designed as such. 2ven in weak soil a pile will not fail by buckling and this

effect need only be considered if part of the pile is unsupported, i.e. if it is in either air or water.

5oad is transmitted to the soil through friction or cohesion. 6ut sometimes, the soil surrounding

the pile may adhere to the surface of the pile and causes 78egative *kin 0riction7 on the pile.

This, sometimes have considerable effect on the capacity of the pile. 8egative skin friction is

caused by the drainage of the ground water and consolidation of the soil. The founding depth of

the pile is influenced by the results of the site investigate on and soil test.

1.4.3 Friction or cohesion piles

)arrying capacity is derived mainly from the adhesion or friction of the soil in contact with the

shaft of the pile 3see fig %.#4.

0igure %9% 2nd bearing piles 0igure %9# 0riction or cohesion pile

1.4.4 Cohesion piles

These piles transmit most of their load to the soil through skin friction. This process of driving

such piles close to each other in groups greatly reduces the porosity and compressibility of the

soil within and around the groups. Therefore piles of this category are some times called

compaction piles. uring the process of driving the pile into the ground, the soil becomes

moulded and, as a result loses some of its strength. Therefore the pile is not able to transfer the

exact amount of load which it is intended to immediately after it has been driven. :sually, the soil

regains some of its strength three to five months after it has been driven.

1.4.5 Friction piles

These piles also transfer their load to the ground through skin friction. The process of driving

such piles does not compact the soil appreciably. These types of pile foundations are commonly

known as floating pile foundations.

1.4.6 Combination of friction piles and cohesion piles

.n extension of the end bearing pile when the bearing stratum is not hard, such as a firm clay.

The pile is driven far enough into the lower material to develop adequate frictional resistance. .

farther variation of the end bearing pile is piles with enlarged bearing areas. This is achieved by

forcing a bulb of concrete into the soft stratum immediately above the firm layer to give an

enlarged base. . similar effect is produced with bored piles by forming a large cone or bell at the

bottom with a special reaming tool. 6ored piles which are provided with a bell have a high tensile

strength and can be used as tension piles 3see fig.%9;4

0igure %9; under9reamed base enlargement to a

bore9and9cast9in9situ pile

1.4. Classification of pile with respect to t!pe of material

Timber

Concrete

Steel

Composite piles

1.4." #imber piles

:sed from earliest record time and still used for permanent works in regions where timber is

plentiful. Timber is most suitable for long cohesion piling and piling beneath embankments. The

timber should be in a good condition and should not have been attacked by insects. 0or timber

piles of length less than %' meters, the diameter of the tip should be greater than %<( mm. !f the

length is greater than %+ meters a tip with a diameter of %#< mm is acceptable. !t is essential that

the timber is driven in the right direction and should not be driven into firm ground. .s this can

easily damage the pile. =eeping the timber below the ground water level will protect the timber

against decay and putrefaction. To protect and strengthen the tip of the pile, timber piles can be

provided with toe cover. Pressure creosoting is the usual method of protecting timber piles.

1.4.$ Concrete pile

Pre cast concrete Piles or Pre fabricated concrete piles : :sually of square 3see fig %9' b4,

triangle, circle or octagonal section, they are produced in short length in one metre intervals

between ; and %; meters. They are pre9caste so that they can be easily connected together in

order to reach to the required length 3fig %9' a4 . This will not decrease the design load capacity.

>einforcement is necessary within the pile to help withstand both handling and driving stresses.

Pre stressed concrete piles are also used and are becoming more popular than the ordinary pre

cast as less reinforcement is required .

0igure %9' a4 concrete pile connecting detail. b4 squared pre9cast concert pile

The ?ercules type of pile joint 30igure %9<4 is easily and accurately cast into the pile and is

quickly and safely joined on site. They are made to accurate dimensional tolerances from high

grade steels.

0igure %9< ?ercules type of pile joint

1.4.1% &riven and cast in place Concrete piles

Two of the main types used in the := are/ West@s shell pile / Pre cast, reinforced concrete tubes,

about % m long, are threaded on to a steel mandrel and driven into the ground after a concrete

shoe has been placed at the front of the shells. Ance the shells have been driven to specified

depth the mandrel is withdrawn and reinforced concrete inserted in the core. iameters vary

from ;#< to B(( mm.

0ranki Pile/ . steel tube is erected vertically over the place where the pile is to be driven, and

about a metre depth of gravel is placed at the end of the tube. . drop hammer, %<(( to '(((kg

mass, compacts the aggregate into a solid plug which then penetrates the soil and takes the

steel tube down with it. When the required depth has been achieved the tube is raised slightly

and the aggregate broken out. ry concrete is now added and hammered until a bulb is formed.

>einforcement is placed in position and more dry concrete is placed and rammed until the pile

top comes up to ground level.

1.4.11 'teel piles

*teel piles/ 3figure %.'4 steelC !ron piles are suitable for handling and driving in long lengths. Their

relatively small cross9sectional area combined with their high strength makes penetration easier

in firm soil. They can be easily cut off or joined by welding. !f the pile is driven into a soil with low

p? value, then there is a risk of corrosion, but risk of corrosion is not as great as one might think.

.lthough tar coating or cathodic protection can be employed in permanent works.

!t is common to allow for an amount of corrosion in design by simply over dimensioning the

cross9sectional area of the steel pile. !n this way the corrosion process can be prolonged up to

<( years. 8ormally the speed of corrosion is (.#9(.< mmCyear and, in design, this value can be

taken as %mmCyear

a) X- cross-section

b) H - cross-

section

c) steel pipe

0igure %9B *teel piles cross9sections

1.4.12 Composite piles

)ombination of different materials in the same of pile. .s indicated earlier, part of a timber pile

which is installed above ground water could be vulnerable to insect attack and decay. To avoid

this, concrete or steel pile is used above the ground water level, whilst wood pile is installed

under the ground water level 3see figure %.&4.

0igure %9& Protecting timber piles from decay/

a4 by pre9cast concrete upper section above water level.

b4 by extending pile cap below water level

1.4.13 Classification of pile with respect to effect on the soil

. simplified division into driven or bored piles is often employed.

1.4.14 &riven piles

riven piles are considered to be displacement piles. !n the process of driving the pile into the

ground, soil is moved radially as the pile shaft enters the ground. There may also be a

component of movement of the soil in the vertical direction.

0igure %9+ driven piles

1.4.15 (ored piles

6ored piles3>eplacement piles) are generally considered to be non9displacement piles a void is

formed by boring or excavation before piles is produced. Piles can be produced by casting

concrete in the void. *ome soils such as stiff clays are particularly amenable to the formation of

piles in this way, since the bore hole walls do not requires temporary support except cloth to the

ground surface. !n unstable ground, such as gravel the ground requires temporary support from

casing or bentonite slurry. .lternatively the casing may be permanent, but driven into a hole

which is bored as casing is advanced. . different technique, which is still essentially non9

displacement, is to intrude, a grout or a concrete from an auger which is rotated into the granular

soil, and hence produced a grouted column of soil.

There are three non9displacement methods/ bored cast9 in 9 place piles, particularly pre9formed

piles and grout or concrete intruded piles.

The following are replacement piles/

.ugered

)able percussion drilling

5arge9diameter under9reamed

Types incorporating pre caste concrete unite

rilled9in tubes

-ini piles

1.5 ide to classification of piles

0igure %9+. for a quick understanding of pile classification, a hierarchical representation of pile

types can be used. .lso advantages and disadvantages of different pile materials is given in

section %.B.

0igure %9, hierarchical representation of pile types

1.! dvanta"es and disadvanta"es of different pile #aterial

$ood piles

% The piles are easy to handle

% >elatively inexpensive where timber is plentiful.

% *ections can be joined together and excess length easily removed.

&& The piles will rot above the ground water level. ?ave a limited bearing capacity.

&& )an easily be damaged during driving by stones and boulders.

&& The piles are difficult to splice and are attacked by marine borers in salt water.

Prefabricated concrete piles 'reinforced( and pre stressed concrete piles. 'driven( affected

b) t*e "round +ater conditions.

% o not corrode or rot.

% .re easy to splice. >elatively inexpensive.

% The quality of the concrete can be checked before driving.

% *table in squee1ing ground, for example, soft clays, silts and peats pile material can be

inspected before piling.

% )an be re driven if affected by ground heave. )onstruction procedure unaffected by ground

water.

% )an be driven in long lengths. )an be carried above ground level, for example, through water

for marine structures.

% )an increase the relative density of a granular founding stratum.

&& >elatively difficult to cut.

&& isplacement, heave, and disturbance of the soil during driving.

&& )an be damaged during driving. >eplacement piles may be required.

&& *ometimes problems with noise and vibration.

&& )annot be driven with very large diameters or in condition of limited headroom.

,riven and cast&in&place concrete piles

Per#anentl) cased 'casin" left in t*e "round(

-e#poraril) cased or uncased 'casin" retrieved(

% )an be inspected before casting can easily be cut or extended to the desired length.

% >elatively inexpensive.

% 5ow noise level.

% The piles can be cast before excavation.

% Pile lengths are readily adjustable.

% .n enlarged base can be formed which can increase the relative density of a granular founding

stratum leading to much higher end bearing capacity.

% >einforcement is not determined by the effects of handling or driving stresses.

% )an be driven with closed end so excluding the effects of DW

&& ?eave of neighbouring ground surface, which could lead to re consolidation and the

development of negative skin friction forces on piles.

&& isplacement of nearby retaining walls. 5ifting of previously driven piles, where the penetration

at the toe have been sufficient to resist upward movements.

&& Tensile damage to unreinforced piles or piles consisting of green concrete, where forces at the

toe have been sufficient to resist upward movements.

&& amage piles consisting of uncased or thinly cased green concrete due to the lateral forces

set up in the soil, for example, necking or waisting. )oncrete cannot be inspected after

completion. )oncrete may be weakened if artesian flow pipes up shaft of piles when tube is

withdrawn.

&& 5ight steel section or Precast concrete shells may be damaged or distorted by hard driving.

&& 5imitation in length owing to lifting forces required to withdraw casing, nose vibration and

ground displacement may a nuisance or may damage adjacent structures.

&& )annot be driven where headroom is limited.

&& >elatively expensive.

&& Time consuming. )annot be used immediately after the installation.

&& 5imited length.

.ored and cast in &place 'non &displace#ent piles(

% 5ength can be readily varied to suit varying ground conditions.

% *oil removed in boring can be inspected and if necessary sampled or in9 situ test made.

% )an be installed in very large diameters.

% 2nd enlargement up to two or three diameters are possible in clays.

% -aterial of piles is not dependent on handling or driving conditions.

% )an be installed in very long lengths.

% )an be installed with out appreciable noise or vibrations.

% )an be installed in conditions of very low headroom.

% 8o risk of ground heave.

&& *usceptible to 7waisting7 or 7necking7 in squee1ing ground.

&& )oncrete is not placed under ideal conditions and cannot be subsequently inspected.

&& Water under artesian pressure may pipe up pile shaft washing out cement.

&& 2nlarged ends cannot be formed in cohesionless materials without special techniques.

&& )annot be readily extended above ground level especially in river and marine structures.

&& 6oring methods may loosen sandy or gravely soils requiring base grouting to achieve

economical base resistance.

&& *inking piles may cause loss of ground ! cohesion9less leading to settlement of adjacent

structures.

/teel piles '0olled steel section(

% The piles are easy to handle and can easily be cut to desired length.

% )an be driven through dense layers. The lateral displacement of the soil during driving is low

3steel section ? or ! section piles4 can be relatively easily spliced or bolted.

% )an be driven hard and in very long lengths.

% )an carry heavy loads.

% )an be successfully anchored in sloping rock.

% *mall displacement piles particularly useful if ground displacements and disturbance critical.

&& The piles will corrode,

&& Will deviate relatively easy during driving.

&& .re relatively expensive.

1.1 Classification of piles & 0evie+

- -as2

1. escribe the main function of piles

2. !n the introduction, it is stated that piles transfer load to the bearing ground. *tate

how this is achieved.

3. Piles are made out of different materials. !n short state the advantages and

disadvantages of these materials.

4. Piles can be referred as displacement and non9displacement piles. *tate the

differences and the similarities of these piles

5. Piles can be classified as end9bearing piles cohesive or friction piles. escribe the

differences and similarity of these piles.

6. Piles can be classified as bored or driven state the differences.

.ac2 to -op

3i#it /tate ,esi"n

Introduction

Traditionally, design resistance of foundations has been evaluated

on an allowable stress basis that piles were designed with ultimate

axial capacity between # and ; times than working load. ?owever

structural design is now using a limit state design 35*4 bases

whereby partial factors are applied to various elements of the

design according to the reliability with which the parameters are

known or can be calculated. 5* approach is the base of all the

2urocodes, including that for foundations design. !t is believed that

5imit state design has many benefits for the economic design of

piling. The eurocode approach is particularly rigorous, and this

guide adopts the partial factors presented in the codes.

4urocode 1 divides investigation, design and implementation of

geoconstructions into three categories. !t is a requirement of the

code that project must be supervised at all stages by personnel

with geotechnical knowledge.

!n order to establish minimum requirements for the extent and

quality of geotechnical investigation, deign and construction three

geotechnical categories defined. These are/ Deotechnical )ategory

%, #, ;.

15.1 6oetec*nical cate"or) 17 6C 1

this category includes small and relative simple structures/

9for which is impossible to ensure that the fundamental

requirements will be satisfied on the basis of experience and

qualitative geotecnical investigationE

9with negligible risk for property and life.

Deotechnical )ategory % procedures will be only be sufficient in

ground conditions which are known from comparable experience to

be sufficiently straight9forward that routine methods may be used

for foundation design and construction. Fualitative geotechnical

investigations

15.2 6eotec*nical Cate"or)7 6C 2

This category includes conventional types of structures and

foundations with no abnormal risks or unusual or exceptionally

difficult ground or loading conditions. *tructures in Deotechnical

category # require quantitative geotechnical data and analysis to

ensure that the fundamental requirements will be satisfied, but

routine procedures for field and laboratory testing and for design

and execution may be used. Fualified engineer with relevant

experience must be involved.

15.3 6eotec*nical Cate"or)7 6C 3

This category includes structures or parts of structures which do not

fall within the limits of Deotechnical )ategories %and #.

The following are examples of structures or parts of structures

complying with geotechnical category #/

conventional type of /

spread foundationsE

raft foundationsE

piled foundationsE

walls and other structures retaining for supporting soil or

waterE

excavationsE

bridge piers and abutmentsE

embankment and earthworksE

ground anchors and other tie9back systemsE

tunnels in hard, non9fractured rock and not subjected to

special water tightness or other requirement.

6eotec*nical Cate"or) 3 includes very large or unusual structure.

*tructures involving abnormal risks or unusual or exceptionally

difficult ground or loading conditions and highly seismic areas.

Fualified geotechnical engineer must be involved.

The following factors must be considered in arriving at a

classification of a structure or part of a structure/

8ature and si1e of the structure

5ocal conditions, e.g. traffic, utilities, hydrology, subsidence,

etc.

Dround and groundwater conditions

>egional seismicityG..

1%.3.1 Conditions classified as in Eurocode

!n the code, conditions are classified as favourable or unfavourable.

Favourable conditions are as suc*:

% if experience shows that the material posses limited spreading

characteristic

% if large scale investigation was carried out and test results are

reliable

% the existence of well documented investigation carried out using

reliable methods which can give reproducible results

% if additional tests, investigations and supervisions are

recommend

% high certainty in defining test results

% failure is plastic

&& if experience shows that the material posses spreading

characteres

&& if test results shows large spreading than the normal conditions

&& if the extent of investigation is limited

&& limited experience and methods lucking reproducibility

&& where there is no recommendation for additional test,

investigations and supervision

&& uncertainty in analysing test results

&& if failure is brittle

2urocode & refers to foundation loadings as action. The se can be

permanent as !n the case of weights of structures and installations,

or variable as imposed loading, or wind and snow loads. They can

be accidental, e.g. vehicle impact or explosions.

.ctions can vary spatially, e.g. self9weights are fixed 3fixed actions4,

but imposed loads can vary in position 3free actions4. The duration

of actions affections affects the response of the ground. !t may

cause strengthening such as the gain in strength of a clay by long9

term loading, or weakening as in the case of excavation slopes in

clay over the medium or long term. To allow for this 2urocode &

introduces a classification related to the soil response and refers to

transient actions 3e.g. wind loads4, short9term actions 3e.g.

construction loading4 and long9term actions. !n order to allow for

uncertainties in the calculation of he magnitude of actions or

combinations of actions and their duration and spatial distribution,

2uorcode requires the design values of actions F

d

to be used for

the geotechnical design either to be assessed directly or to be

derived from characteristic values F

k

/

F

d

= F

k

15.4 -*e partial factors

#7 n7 0d

-*e partial factor

#

: this factor is applied as a safety factor that

the characteristic values of the material is divided by this factor. 3m

H material index4 and covers /

unfavourable deviation from the material

product property

inaccuracies in the conversion factors/ and

uncertainties in the geometric properties and

the resistance model.

!n ultimate limit state, depending upon a given conditions, for

Deotechnical )ategory #, the values of the

m

may be decided

using table %(9%I %(9#.

-*e partial co&efficient

n

/ in order to ensure stability and

adequate strength in the structure and in the ground, in the code,

cases ., 6, and ) have been introduced. Jalues of

n

is given in

table %(9;

Partial co&efficient

0d

/ this co9efficient is applied in consideration

of deviation between test results and future construction. Jalues of

the

n

should be between %.' 9 %.+

-able 15&1 partial factors on #aterial properties for conventional desi"n situations for ulti#ate li#it

states

-aterial property Partial factor

m

tan %.%9 %.#<

modules %.# 9 %.+

other properties %.B 9 #.(

-able 15&2 partial factors on #aterial properties for conventional desi"n situations for service li#it

state

-aterial property Partial factor

m

modules %.# 9 %.+

other properties %.B 9 #.(

9or#all) t*e desi"n values7 d 7 4d7 tan 7 can be decided usin" t*e follo+in" for#ulae:

f

d

= f

k

/(

n m

)

E

d

= E

k

/(

n m

)

tan

d

= tan

k

/(

n m

)

Where:

f = reaction force

= internal angle of friction

E = elastic module

-able 15&3 partial factor n

)lass

n

. %.(

6 %.%

) %.#

-able 15&4 ad*esion factor

pile

b

s

)oncrete piles (.< (.((<

*teel piles (.< (.((#

timber piles 3wood piles4 (.< (.((,

The table is used for qc %( -pa

-able 15&5 .earin" factors 9 7 9:7 9C

d 8 8) 8q

#< B.'+ #(.& %(.&

#B &.B' ##.# %%.+

#& +.,, #;., %;.#

#+ %(.B #<.+ %'.&

#, %#.< #&., %B.'

;( %'.& ;(.% %+.'

;% %&.' ;#.& #(.B

;# #(.B ;<.< #;.#

;; #'.' ;+., #B.%

;' #,.( '#.# #,.'

;< ;'.' 'B.% ;;.;

;B '%., <(.B ;&.&

;& ',.% <<.B '#.,

;+ <+., B%.; '+.,

;, &(., B&., <B.(

'( +<.B &<.; B'.#

'% %(' +;., &;.,

'# %#B ,;.& +<.'

'; %<' %(< ,,.(

'' %,( %%+ %%<

'< #;' %;' %;<

Back to Top

Copyright of the material in this suite of web pages belongs to the authors.

Last updated: May 13, 1999.

3O, O9 PI34/

2.1 Introduction

This section of the guide is divided into two parts. The first part gives brief

summary on basic pile arrangements while part two deals with load distribution on

individual piles.

Piles can be arranged in a number of ways so that they can support load imposed

on them. Jertical piles can be designed to carry vertical loads as well as lateral

loads. !f required, vertical piles can be combined with raking piles to support

hori1ontal and vertical forces.

often, if a pile group is subjected to vertical force, then the calculation of load

distribution on single pile that is member of the group is assumed to be the total

load divided by the number of piles in the group. ?owever if a group of piles is

subjected to lateral load or eccentric vertical load or combination of vertical and

lateral load which can cause moment force on the group which should be taken

into account during calculation of load distribution.

!n the second part of this section, piles are considered to be part of the structure

and force distribution on individual piles is calculated accordingly.

Objective/ !n the first part of this section, considering group of piles with limited

number of piles subjected to vertical and lateral forces, forces acting centrally or

eccentrically, we learn how these forces are distributed on individual piles.

The worked examples are intended to give easy follow through exercise that can

help quick understanding of pile design both single and group of piles. !n the

second part, the comparison made between different methods used in pile design

will enable students to appreciate the theoretical background of the methods while

exercising pile designing.

3earnin" outco#e

When students complete this section, they will be able to/

)alculate load distribution on group of piles consist of vertical piles

subjected to eccentric vertical load.

)alculate load distribution on vertically arranged piles subjected to

lateral and vertical forces.

)alculate load distribution on vertical and raking piles subjected to

hori1ontal and eccentric vertical loads.

)alculate load distribution on symmetrically arranged vertical and

raking piles subjected to vertical and lateral forces

2.2 Pile arran"e#ent

8ormally, pile foundations consist of pile cap and a group of piles. The pile cap

distributes the applied load to the individual piles which, in turn,. transfer the load to

the bearing ground. The individual piles are spaced and connected to the pile cap

or tie beams and trimmed in order to connect the pile to the structure at cut)off

level, and depending on the type of structure and eccentricity of the load, they can

be arranged in different patterns. 0igure #.% bellow illustrates the three basic

formation of pile groups.

a4 P!52 D>A:P )A8*!*T A0 A85K

J2>T!).5 P!52*

b4 P!52 D>A:P )A8*!*T A0 6AT?

J2>T!).5 .8 >.=!8D P!52*

c4 *K--2T>!).55K .>>.8D2

J2>T!).5 .8 >.=!8D P!52*

Q = Vertically applied load

H = Horizontally applied load

0igure #9% 6asic formation of pile groups

Ba! to "op

Copyright of the material in this suite of web pages belongs to the authors.

Last updated: May 1#, 1999.

3O, ,I/-0I.8-IO9

To a great extent the design and calculation 3load analysis4 of pile foundations is carried out

using computer software. 0or some special cases, calculations can be carried out using the

following methodsG...0or a simple understanding of the method, let us assume that the

following conditions are satisfied/

The pile is rigid

The pile is pinned at the top and at the bottom

2ach pile receives the load only vertically 3i.e. axially applied 4E

The force P

acting on the pile is proportional to the displacement : due to compression

P = k.U GGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG;.%

Since P = E.A

E.A = k.U GGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG;.#

GGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG;.;

where:

P

= vertical load component

k = material constant

U = displacement

E = elastic module of pile material

A = cross-sectional area of pile

Copyright of the material in this suite of web pages belongs to the authors.

Last updated: May 1#, 1999.

3O, O9 /I9634 PI34

4.1 Introduction

!n this section, considering pileCsoil interaction, we learn to calculate the bearing capacity of single piles

subjected to compressive axial load. uring pile design, the following factors should be taken into

consideration/

pile material compression and tension capacity

deformation area of pile, bending moment capacity

condition of the pile at the top and the end of the pile

eccentricity of the load applied on the pile

soil characteristics

ground water level ..etc.

8evertheless, calculation method that can satisfy all of these conditions will be complicated and difficult to

carry out manually, instead two widely used simplified methods are presented. These two methods are

refereed as geotechnical and dynamic methods. This section too has worked examples showing the

application of the formulae used in predicting the bearing capacity of piles made of different types of

materials.

3earnin" outco#e

When students complete this section, they will be able to

understand the theoretical back ground of the formulae used in pile design

carry out calculation and be able to predict design bearing capacity of single piles

appreciate results calculated by means of different formulae

4.2 -*e be*aviour of piles under load

Piles are designed that calculations and prediction of carrying capacity is based on the application of

ultimate axial load in the particular soil conditions at the site at relatively short time after installation.

This ultimate load capacity can be determined by either/

the use of empirical formula to predict capacity from soil properties determined by testing, or

load test on piles at the site

0ig.'9%, When pile is subjected to gradually increasing compressive load in maintained load stages, initially

the pile9soil system behaves in a linear9elastic manner up to point . on the settlement9load diagram and if

the load is realised at any stage up to this point the pile head rebound to its original level. When the load is

increase beyond point .

there is yielding at, or close to, the pile9soil interface and slippage occurs until

point 6

is reached, when the maximum skin friction on the pile shaft will have been mobilised. !f the load

is realised at this stage the pile head will rebound to point )

the distance A). When the stage of full mobilisation of the base resistance is reached 3 point 4, the pile

plunges downwards with out any farther increase of load, or small increases in load producing large

settlements.

o end!bearing is mobilised up to this point. The whole of the load is carried by the s"in friction on the pile shaft see figure 4-1 I)

The pile shaft is carrying its ma#imum s"in friction and the pile toe will be carrying some load

$t this point there is no further increase in the load transferred in s"in friction but the base load will have reached its ma#imum value.

0igure 9% axial compression of pile

4.3 6eotec*nical desi"n #et*ods

!n order to separate their behavioural responses to applied pile load, soils are classified as either

granularCnoncohesive or claysCcohesive. The generic formulae used to predict soil resistance to pile load

include empirical modifying factors which can be adjusted according to previous engineering experience of

the influence on the accuracy of predictions of changes in soil type and other factors such as the time

delay before load testing.

30ig '9%&&4 the load settlement response is composed of two separate components, the linear elastic shaft

friction >

s

and non9linear base resistance >

b

. The concept of the separate evaluation of shaft friction and

base resistance forms the bases of 7static or soil mechanics7 calculation of pile carrying capacity. The

basic equations to be used for this are written as/

F H F

b

L F

s

9 W

p

or

>

c

H >

b

L >

s

9 W

p

>

t

H >

s

L W

p

Where: F H >

c

H the ultimate compression resistance of the pile

F

b

H >

b

H base resistance

F

s

H >

s

H shaft resistance

W

p

H weight of the pile

>

t

H tensile resistance of pile

!n terms of soil mechanics theory, the ultimate skin friction on the pile shaft is related to the hori1ontal

effective stress acting on the shaft and the effective remoulded angle of friction between the pile and the

clay and the ultimate shaft resistance >

s

can be evaluated by integration of the pile9soil shear strength

over the surface area of the shaft/

a = Ca +

n

tan a

Where: n = Ks v (refer geotechnical notes)

a = Ca + KS v tan a

and

where' p = pile perimeter

( = pile length

= angle of friction between pile and soil

)s = coefficient of lateral pressure

the ultimate bearing capacity, *b, of the base is evaluated from the bearing capacity theory'

$b = area of pile base

C = undrained strength of soil at base of pile

C = bearing capacity factor

+++++++++++++++++,.%

8evertheless, in practise, for a given pile at a given site, the undrained shear strength )

a

varies

considerably with many factors, including, pile type, soil type, and methods of installations.

!deally, )

a

should be determined from a pile9load test, but since this is not always possible, )

a

is correlated

with the undrained cohesion )

u

by empirical adhesion factor so that the general expression in e.q. 3'9%4

could be simplified to the following expression/

GGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG

Where/ Ws H weight of soil replaced by the pile

Haverage value of shear strength over the whole shaft length

4.3.1 #he undrained load capacit! *total stress approach+

0or piles in clay, the undrained load capacity is generally taken to be the critical value unless the clay is

highly over consolidated. !f the undrained or short9term ultimate load capacity is to be computed, the soil

parameters ), , , should be appropriate to undrained conditions and

v

and

vb

should be the total

stresses. !f the clay is saturated

u

is 1ero, and

a

3angle of friction

between pile and soil4 may also be taken as 1ero. !n addition, 8

q

H %, 8 H %, so that the eq in3'9%4 reduces

to/

+++++++++++++++++,.-

Where/ 8

c

, 8

q

, 8 ,H bearing capacity factors and are functions of the internal angle of friction of the soil,

the relative compressibility of the soil and the pile geometry.

4.3.2 &rained load capacit! *effective stress approach+

0or piles installed in stiff, over consolidated clays, the drained load capacity is taken as design criterion. !f

the simplified assumption is made that the drained pile9soil adhesion )M

a

is 1ero and that the term in eq

3'9%4Ginvolving 8

c

, 8 ignoring the drained ultimate bearing capacity of the pile may be expressed as /

GGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG'.'

Where/ s M

v,

and s M

vb

H effective vertical stress at depth 1 respective at pile base

f M

a

,H effective angle of friction between pileCsoil and implied can be taken as f M ,

8

q

which is dependant up on the values of f M may be taken to be the same as for piles in sand, and can be

decided using table %(9< I %(9B

4.3.3 ,ile in sand

!f the pile soil adhesion )

a

and term 8

c

are taken as 1ero in e.q 3'9%4G and the terms (.< d 8 is

neglected as being small in relation to the term involving 8 , the ultimate load capacity of a single pile in

sand may be expressed as follows/

GGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG'.<

Where/ s M

v,

and s M

vb

H effective vertical stress at depth 1 respective at pile base

0

w

H correction factor for tapered pile 3 H % for uniform diameter4

4.4 ,)na#ic approac*

-ost frequently used method of estimating the load capacity of driven piles is to use a driving formula or

dynamic formula. .ll such formulae relate ultimate load capacity to pile set 3the vertical movement per blow

of the driving hammer4 and assume that the driving resistance is equal to the load capacity to the pile

under static loading they are based on an idealised representation of the action of the hammer on the pile

in the last stage of its embedment.

:sually, pile9driving formulae are used either to establish a safe working load

requirements for a required working load.

The working load is usually determined by applying a suitable safety factor to the ultimate load calculated

by the formula. ?owever, the use of dynamic formula is highly criticised in some pile9design literatures.

ynamic methods do not take into account the physical characteristics of the soil. This can lead to

dangerous miss9interpretation of the results of dynamic formula calculation since they represent conditions

at the time of driving. They do not take in to account the soil conditions which affect the long9 term carrying

capacity, reconsolidation, negative skin friction and group effects.

Ba! to "op

Copyright of the material in this suite of web pages belongs to the authors.

Last updated: May 13, 1999.

/I9634 PI34 ,4/I69

5.1 4nd bearin" piles

!f a pile is installed in a soil with low bearing capacity but resting on soil beneath

with high bearing capacity, most of the load is carried by the end bearing.

!n some cases where piles are driven in to the ground using hammer, pile

capacity can be estimated by calculating the transfer of potential energy into

dynamic energy . When the hammer is lifted and thrown down, with some energy

lose while driving the pile, potential energy is transferred into dynamic energy. !n

the final stage of the pile@s embedment,An the bases of rate of settlement, it is

able to calculate the design capacity of the pile.

0or standard pile driving hammers and some standard piles with load capacity

(F

sp!

), the working load for the pile can be determined using the relationship

between bearing capacity of the pile, the design load capacity of the pile

described by/ F

sp

n

F

"d

and table <9%

where: F

"d

H design load for end baring.

The data is valid only if at the final stage, rate of settlement is %( mm per ten

blow. .nd pile length not more than #( m and geo9category # . for piles with

length #( 9 ;( m respective ;( 9 <( m the bearing capacity should be reduced by

%( res. #<N.

-able 5&1 .arin" capacit) of piles installed b) *a##erin"

hammer $%&' ()MM*% +released by trigger,

drop hammer +ati-ated by rope and

frition winh

ross-setional area of pile ross-setional area of pile

fall height 0.055m

2

0.073m

2

fall height 0.055m

2

0.073m

2

3 TO

0.3

0.4

0.5

420 !.

4!0

560

450 !.

520

5!0

0.4

0.5

0.6

3!0 !.

450

520

420 !.

4"0

540

4 TO

0.3

0.4

0.5

470

540

610

510

5!0

6"0

0.4

0.5

0.6

440

510

550

4"0

550

610

0.3 5"0 640 0.4 550 600

Copyright of the material in this suite of web pages belongs to the authors.

Last updated: May 13, 1999.

,4/I69 OF PI34 60O8P

Introduction

6roup action in piled foundation/ -ost of pile foundations

consists not of a single pile, but of a group of piles, which act

in the double role of reinforcing the soil, and also of carrying

the applied load down to deeper, stronger soil strata. 0ailure

of the group may occur either by failure of the individual piles

or as failure of the overall block of soil. The supporting

capacity of a group of vertically loaded piles can, in many

cases, be considerably less than the sum of the capacities

the individual piles comprising the group. Drope action in

piled foundation could result in failure or excessive

settlement, even though loading tests made on a single pile

have indicated satisfactory capacity. !n all cases the elastic

and consolidation settlements of the group are greater than

those of single pile carrying the same working load as that

on each pile within the group. This is because the 1one of

soil or rock which is stressed by the entire group extends to

a much greater width and depth than the 1one beneath the

single pile (fi#.$-%)

0igure B9% )omparison of stressed 1one

beneath single pile and pile group

3earnin" out co#e

When students complete this section, they will be able/

o to calculate and predict design bearing

capacity of pile group in different soil types

o to appreciate the governing factors in design of

group of piles

o to design pile groups with appropriate pile

spacing

!.1 .earin" capacit) of pile "roups

Pile groups driven into sand may provide reinforcement to

the soil. !n some cases, the shaft capacity of the pile driven

into sand could increase by factor of # or more.

6ut in the case of piles driven into sensitive clays, the

effective stress increase in the surrounding soil may be less

for piles in a group than for individual piles. this will result in

lower shaft capacities.

0igure B9# :nder axial or lateral load, !n a group, instead of

failure of individual piles in the group, block failure 3the group

acting as a block4 may arise.

0igure B9# 6lock failure

!n general ,the bearing capacity of pile group may be

calculated in consideration to block failure in a similar way to

that of single pile, by means of equation '9%,but hear .

s

as

the block surface area and .

b

as the base area of the block

or by rewriting the general equation we get/

................................3B.%4

#$ere%

&

s

' s(r)ace area o) block

&

b

* base area o) block +see ,-.6-3)

C

b

' C

s

* a.era-e co$esion o) cla/ aro(n0 t$e -ro(p

an0 beneat$ t$e -ro(p.

c

* bearin- capacit/ )actor. 1or 0ept$s rele.ant )or

piles' t$e appropriate .al(e o)

c is

!

2

p

an0 2

s

* #ei-$t o) pile respecti.e #ei-$t o) soil

!n examining the behaviour of pile groups it is necessary to

consider the following elements/

a free9standing group, in which the pile cap is not in contact with

the underlying soil.

a 7piled foundation,7 in which the pile cap is in contact with the

underlying soil.

pile spacing

independent calculations, showing bearing capacity of the block

and bearing capacity of individual piles in the group should be

made.

relate the ultimate load capacity of the block to the sum of load

capacity of individual piles in the group 3 the ratio of block

capacity to the sum of individual piles capacity4 the higher the

better.

!n the case of where the pile spacing in one direction is much

greater than that in perpendicular direction, the capacity of the

group failing as shown in 0igure B9# b4 should be assessed.

6.1.1 ,ile groups in cohesive soil

0or pile groups in cohesive soil, the group bearing capacity as a block

may be calculated by mans of e.q. '9< with appropriate 8c value.

6.1.2 ,ile groups in non)cohesive soil

0or pile groups in non9cohesive soil, the group bearing capacity as a

block may be calculated by means of e.q. '9&

6.1.3 ,ile groups in sand

!n the case of most pile groups installed in sand, the estimated capacity

of the block will be well in excess of the sum of the individual pile

capacities. .s a conservative approach in design, the axial capacity of a

pile group in sand is usually taken as the sum of individual pile capacities

calculated using formulae in '9+.

$or2ed 4;a#ple !&1

)alculate the bearing capacity and group efficiency of pile foundation

installed in uniform clay of bulk unit weight, of #(k8Cm

;

and undrained

shear strength of )u of <(k8Cm

#

. The foundation consists of #< piles

each %+m long ,(.'m in diameter and weight B(k8. The weight of the pile

cap is B((k8 and founded %m below the ground level. The adhesion

factor for the soilCpile interface has a value of (.+

0igure B9; Worked 2xample B9%

'-./#0-1

)alculate single pile bearing capacity/

>s H )s .s H (.+ <( %+ 3(.'4 H ,('k8

>b H 8c )b .b H , <( 3(.#4

#

H <B.Bk8

>ci H >si L >bi H ,(' L <B.B H ,B(

3Wp LWcap4 9 Ws H 3B( #<L3B((9#( <.( <.( %.(44 9 3#( %+ 3(.#4

#

#< H 'B,k8

total load capacity of #< piles H >uc#< H 3>ci H >si L >bi4 #< 9 O3Wp

LWcap4 9 WsP H ,B( #< 9 'B, H #;<;%k8

calculate block load capacity /

H ' 3%+ '.' <( (.+4L <( '.' '.' , H

#<B<(k8

s(r)ace area o) pile -ro(p

#ei-$t o) soil replace0 b/ pile cap

Ba! to "op

Copyright of the material in this suite of web pages belongs to the authors.

Last updated: May 13, 1999.

Pile spacin" and pile

arran"e#ent

!n certain types of soil, specially in sensitive clays, the

capacity of individual piles within the a closely spaced

group may be lower than for equivalent isolated pile.

?owever, because of its insignificant effect, this may be

ignored in design. !nstead the main worry has been that

the block capacity of the group may be less than the sum

of the individual piles capacities. .s a thumb rule, if

spacing is more than # 9 ; pile diameter, then block failure

is most unlikely.

!t is vital importance that pile group in friction and

cohesive soil arranged that even distribution of load in

greater area is achieved.

5arge concentration of piles under the centre of the pile

cap should be avoided. This could lead to load

concentration resulting in local settlement and failure in

the pile cap. Jarying length of piles in the same pile group

may have similar effect.

0or pile load up to ;((k8, the minimum distance to the

pile cap should be %(( mm

for load higher than ;((k8, this distance should be more

than %<( mm.

!n general, the following formula may be used in pile

spacing/

3n0-bearin- an0 )riction piles% 4 *

2.5 +0) 5 0.02 . 6

...............&.%

7o$esion piles% 4 * 3.5 +0) 5 0.02

6

...............&.#

where:

d = assumed pile diameter

L = assumed pile length

S = pile centre to centre distance (spacing)

E2ample )1

. retaining wall imposing a weight of %#(k8Cm including

self9weight of the pile cap is to be constructed on pile

foundation in clay. Timber piles of #<(mm in diameter and

each %'m long with bearing capacity of ,(k8Cst has been

proposed. .sses suitable pile spacing and pile

arrangement.

'olution3

%. recommended minimum pile spacing/

* H ;.< 3d4 L (.(# 5 H ;.< 3(.#<4 L (.(# %' H %.%B m

into two rows/

vertical load H %#(k8C-

single pile load capacity H

,(k8Cst

H 1.33m

spacing in the two rows

minimum distance to the edge of the pile H (.%m . H # (.% L (.#<

L %.%( H %.<<m

here because of the descending nature of the pile diameter a lesser value can be taken ,

say %.%(m

Ba! to "op

Copyright of the material in this suite of web pages belongs to the authors.

Last updated: May 13, 1999.

- Modelling the Behaviour of Piled RaftEnviado porhapsea
- Geotechnical Engineering Lab Report 2Enviado porIan
- Geotechnical Investigation Report of Burj KhalifaEnviado porsumitchoudharymbm91
- QCS 2007 0406.pdfEnviado porRotsapNayrb
- Ground Engineering for the Autoroute 30 PPP Project in Montreal, Quebec CanadaEnviado porAndrew Cushing
- XPIP STE03020 Guidelines for Tank Fdn DesignsEnviado pormacynthia26
- 237977567 Pile Design CalculationEnviado porSethu Madhav
- Micro Piles by Andrew BrengolaEnviado porDiego Orlando Garzón V
- Tpr ProposedSeismicDetailingCriteriaPiersWharvesEnviado porCo Kho Martin
- graha96aEnviado porNoLo Paramarto
- Analysis of Laterally Loaded Piles in Multilayered Soil DepositsEnviado porbrowncas
- MetodosEnviado porbultusan
- Foundation Engineering ICEEnviado porCristina-Alexandra Crăciun
- Method for Prediction of Micropile Resistance for Slope Stabilization.pdfEnviado porAnonymous Re62LKaAC
- Laterally Loaded PileEnviado porvpamatya
- Lecture13-Analisis-of-Single-Piles.pdfEnviado porSmr Ebrahim
- Daily Program June-2011Enviado porMahibul Hasan
- 2012 Product Catalog CompressedEnviado porManuel Flores
- July_2015_1435734432__1622.rtfEnviado porAnonymous uK8c5VniW
- 25-04-2016 dcrEnviado porFaheem Mushtaq
- Design and Construction of Driven Pile Foundations - Volume 1 (nhi16009_v1)Enviado porAmanda Cervantes
- The Role of Full Scale TestingEnviado pormsalgueiro983305
- 6 Technical Solutions by Hat-Type Steel Sheet Piles for Enhancing Safety and Productivity in ConstructionEnviado porMuthuMurugappan
- Cofferdam sEnviado porqmsudhir
- Validation of Empirical Formulas to Derive Model Parameters for SandsEnviado porObaid Ur Rehman
- chapter 8.ppt [Compatibility Mode].pdfEnviado porsmwassy
- [0137124X - Studia Geotechnica Et Mechanica] Comparison of Analysis Specifications and Practices for Diaphragm Wall Retaining SystemEnviado porserçin
- Micro Pile Technique to Control Upward MovementEnviado porRoberto Chacon Alvarez
- Comparative study of backfill retaining systems for onshore RCC pile berth under different site conditionsEnviado porAnonymous k4O2OB4JE0
- UTF-8'en'[2083831X - Studia Geotechnica Et Mechanica] Comparison of Analysis Specifications and Practices for Diaphragm Wall Retaining SystemEnviado porABDO

- Article ReviewEnviado porBright Muza
- Aicd Background Paper 14 Roads Sect Summary EnEnviado porBright Muza
- Fredericton Grad Course Based Part TimeEnviado porBright Muza
- Design of FormworksEnviado porRaffer Asis Moraño
- 012017689082330585_3Enviado porBright Muza
- Ada 258504Enviado porBright Muza
- Res LetterEnviado porBright Muza
- 25112017 Pump B 2nd Lift 1 and 1st Lift 2Enviado porBright Muza
- Tomato Production Guideline 2014Enviado porBright Muza
- 1 Ha Bean_11 March 2014_webEnviado porBright Muza
- Concrete Casting - Pump Station AEnviado porBright Muza
- Debriefing FormEnviado porBright Muza
- Guidelines for Participant Consent and Debriefing FormsEnviado porBright Muza
- Excavation QuantitiesEnviado porBright Muza
- Miracles the Great DebateEnviado porBright Muza
- TCW5202200709 Foundation Engineering DesignEnviado porBright Muza
- TCW5202200605 Foundation Engineering DesignEnviado porBright Muza
- TCW5202200505 Foundation Engineering DesignEnviado porBright Muza
- TCW5001200904 Groundwater Hydraulics and ModellingEnviado porBright Muza
- TCW5201200904 Water Quality ManangementEnviado porBright Muza
- Victoria Falls Control Tower ReportEnviado porBright Muza
- Zim, EU to sign $270m deal _ The HeraldEnviado porBright Muza
- NSSA to inject over $10m in projects _ The HeraldEnviado porBright Muza
- Mega Platinum Project Takes Off _ the HeraldEnviado porBright Muza
- Session8 Worker Engagement and CommunicationEnviado porBright Muza
- Session7 Competence & TrainingEnviado porBright Muza
- Session6 Site Health & SafetyEnviado porBright Muza
- Session5 Principal Contractors & ContractorsEnviado porBright Muza
- Session4 DesignersEnviado porBright Muza
- session2 CllientsEnviado porBright Muza

- Punching Shear in Pad Foundations on RockEnviado porMohan Manickam
- msds hclEnviado porDachi Diputro Niko
- Pneumatic | Hydraulic | Vacuum - All-Technik and ComponentsEnviado porLance Libot
- farmer justin resume 2017 08 mechanical engineerEnviado porapi-324819672
- Bq 24610Enviado porJoanJoanJoan
- Solar Power Plant Design Interconnection 201104Enviado porAmit Pathania
- As 4702-2000 Polymeric Cable Protection CoversEnviado porSAI Global - APAC
- التوصية للمنحة اليابانيةEnviado porمحمد الحدي
- Heat TransferEnviado pordurgendra
- Microwave Sensors List 1Enviado porbsudheertec
- Landa SJ100A Parts Washer ManualEnviado porNeal Bratt
- Genius 8000Enviado porguille
- Aur DinoEnviado porKashif Khan
- API MPMS 19.3 Evaporative Loss MeasurementEnviado porSandra Viviana Esquivel Benavides
- introduction to multimedia notesEnviado porapi-326281162
- Ped Guidelines EnEnviado porMislav Ribar
- 2_Gears.pdfEnviado porPushkar Taralekar
- cse-mag-200503Enviado porThameemul Buhari
- Volume 2 - Part 2_BoQ_10 February 2014Enviado porAbdul Rahuman
- l08101egEnviado porNeelapu Siva Nagaraju
- Qip Ice 22 Engine FrictionEnviado porChetanPrajapati
- First Review PaperEnviado porNikhil Dhiman
- PerlEnviado porraniendu
- Puck Failure CriteriaEnviado porMateusz Duda
- Lexus Timing BeltEnviado porkellogg49055
- Info Esi_news 2014.3 2.0Enviado porMilorad Rumenic
- LCHR E-Handbook 071712Enviado porPrateek Kawatra
- Brilliant Light Powers Tech Business Presentation 06-28-16Enviado porLiberty Newspost Corp.
- P01 GeneralEnviado porTos Hernando
- Pack Calculation ProEnviado porAngelMarcoAntonioNetro

## Muito mais do que documentos

Descubra tudo o que o Scribd tem a oferecer, incluindo livros e audiolivros de grandes editoras.

Cancele quando quiser.