27

Table 1.3
Civil Status of the Respondents
Civil status Frequency Percentage

PUBLIC
Single 4 3.10
Married 118 91.47
Widow 5 3.88
Widower 2 1.55

PRIVATE
Single 21 52.5
Married 18 45
Widow 0 0
Widower 1 2.5

Table 1.3 shows the Civil Status of the Respondents. As
shown in the table that there are more teacher respondents in
public elementary schools who are already married, while in
private elementary schools most of the teachers are still
single.
Table 1.4
Number of Dependent of the Respondents
Number of
Dependent
Frequency Percentage

PUBLIC
0 2 1.55
1-2 78 60.47
3-4 34 26.35
5- above 15 11.63

PRIVATE
0 7 17.5
1-2 19 47.5
3-4 11 27.5
5-above 3 7.5

Table 1.4 shows the number of dependent of the respondent.
As shown in the table that majority of the teacher respondents
in public elementary schools have 1-2 or 60.47% number of
dependent, while in private elementary schools also have 1-2 or
47.5% number of dependent.
28

Table 1.5
Highest Educational Attainment of the Respondents
Highest educational
attainment of Respondents
Frequency Percentage


PUBLIC
BEED 100 77.52
BSE 2 1.55
Earned units in M.A 24 18.60
M.A Education 3 2.33
Others 0 0


PRIVATE
BEED 16 40
BSE 7 17.5
Earned units in M.A 11 27.5
M.A Education 6 15
Others 0 0
Table 1.5 shows the Highest Educational Attainment of the
respondent. As shown in the table that majority of the teacher
respondents in public and private elementary schools have the
highest educational attainment is BEED.
Table 1.6
Years of Teaching of the Respondent
Years of Teaching of
Respondents
Frequency Percentage




PUBLIC
1-4 4 3.10
5-9 7 5.43
10-14 33 25.58
15-19 55 42.64
20-24 8 6.20
25-29 9 6.98
30-34 12 9.20
35-39 1 0.78
40-above 0 0



PRIVATE
1-4 12 30
5-9 12 30
10-14 6 15
15-19 1 2.5
20-24 3 7.5
25-29 3 7.5
30-34 0 0
35-39 0 0
40-above 3 7.5

Table 1.6 shows the Years of Teaching of the Respondent. As
shown in the table that majority of the teacher respondents in
public elementary schools are 15-19 years in teaching
29

profession, while in private elementary schools it implies that
majority are new in the field of teaching profession.
Table 1.7
Monthly Salary of the Respondents
Monthly Salary Frequency Percentage



PUBLIC
5,000-10,000 0 0
11,000-15,000 0 0
16,000-20,000 50 38.76
21,000-25,000 60 46.51
26,000-30,000 16 12.40
31,000-35,000 3 2.33



PRIVATE
5,000-10,000 21 52.5
11,000-15,000 16 40
16,000-20,000 3 7.5
21,000-25,000 0 0
26,000-30,000 0 0
31,000-35,000 0 0

Table 1.7 shows the Monthly Salary of the Respondents. As
shown in the table, majority of the teacher respondents in
public elementary school have a salary that fall within the
range of 21,000 to 25,000 with a total number of 60 and
percentage of 46.51%, while majority of the teacher respondents
in private elementary schools have a salary that fall within the
range of 5,000 to 10,000 with a total number of 21 percentage of
52.5%.
Table 1.8
Status of Appointment of the Respondents
Status of
Appointment
Frequency Percentage

PUBLIC
Substitute 0 0
Temporary 0 0
Permanent 129 100

PRIVATE
Substitute 1 2.5
Temporary 12 30
Permanent 27 67.5
Table 1.8 shows the Status of Appointment of the
Respondent. It presents that majority of the teacher respondents
30

in the public and private elementary schools are permanent in
status of appointment.
Table 1.9
Eligibility of the Respondents
Eligibility of
Respondents
Frequency Percentage
PUBLIC LET passer 86 66.67
Others 43 33.33
PRIVATE LET passer 28 70
Others 12 30

Table 1.9 shows the Eligibility of the respondents. It
presents that majority of the teachers respondents in public and
private elementary schools are LET passers.
Table 1.10

Seminars Attended of the Respondents
Seminars Attended
by Respondents
Frequency Percentage



PUBLIC
1-3 2 1.55
4-6 6 4.65
7-9 23 17.83
10-12 28 21.71
13-15 25 19.38
16-above 45 34.38


PRIVATE
1-3 8 20
4-6 13 32.5
7-9 10 25
10-12 1 2.5
13-15 0 0
16-above 8 20

Table 1.10 shows Seminars Attended of the Respondents. It
presents that majority of the respondents in public elementary
schools have attended 16 seminars and above, while in private
elementary schools implies that most of the teacher respondents
have only 4 to 6 seminars attended.
31

Table 2.1

Evaluation on the Teaching Strategies of the Respondent


PUBLIC PRIVATE
ITEMS WM VI Rank WM VI Rank
1. I bring variation in my
teaching strategies to
reach out pupil
learning.

1.81

Strongly
agree

1

1.3

Strongly
agree

2

2. I set high alternative
expectations which are
suitable for all type of
learner.

2.01

Agree

10

1.5

Agree

8
3. I integrate what I have
acquired from training
in my lessons.

1.85

Agree

2

1.25

Agree

1
4. I make extra effort to
increase the pace of
slow learners.

1.87

Agree

3

1.45

Strongly
agree

6
5. I provide a remedial
teaching after the
class.

1.81

Agree

1

1.47

Strongly
agree

7
6. I use concrete
illustration of complex
or abstracts ideas for
the learners for better
understanding of the
lesson.


1.89


Agree


4


1.42



Strongly
agree


5
7. I use the strategies
for social skills of the
learners who have
attention deficit
disorder.

1.98

Agree

8

1.37

Strongly
agree

4
8. I assign the task to a
specific level of
difficulty to develop
problem-solving skill of
the learner.


2.08


Agree


13


1.65


Agree


13
9. I provide pace of work
properly for average
learner.

1.99

Agree

9

1.55

Agree

10
10. I use on going
assessment to check
learners learning


1.96


Agree


7


1.57


Agree


11
32

through an instructional
procedure.

11. I use video and
television if it is
needed to explain the
lesson.

2.51

Agree

19

1.37

Strongly
agree

4
12. I use a PowerPoint
presentation in
discussion to stimulate
learning.

3.08

Moderately
agree

21

1.7

Agree

14
13. I provide different
instructional materials
to cater the needs of
the learners.

1.89

Agree


4

1.55

Agree

10
14. I provide mini library
for my learners to
support their learning.

2.18

Agree

15

2.0


Agree

18
15. Oftentimes, the
teaching method I use is
not effective because it
does not meet the
different needs of my
learners all the time.


3.10


Moderately
agree


22


2.27


Agree


19
16. Most of the time, the
activities I give are
not aligned with the
objectives of the
lesson.

3.76

Disagree

25

3.42

Moderately
agree

20
17. When I am tired, I
would not check whether
the strategies that I
used are really helping
the pupils learning.


3.68


Disagree


24


4.1


Disagree


23
18. I do not consider that
there are different
learning styles that
keep on insisting using
strategies even it will
not help pupils to
learn.

4.25

Disagree

26

1.37

Strongly
agree


22


19. Because of many
strategies to be used, I
found it hard to choose
what strategies are
effective that could
meet the needs and


3.58


Disagree


23


4.1



Disagree


21
33

learning styles of
diverse learners.
20. I use the experiential
leaning for the pupils
to see the real life
situation of learning.

2.24

Agree

17

1.37

Strongly
agree


4
21. I established better
communication among the
pupils.

1.91

Agree

5

1.45

Strongly
agree


6
22. I utilized materials
that will support the
lesson.

2.03

Agree

11

1.55

Agree

10
23. I integrated what I
have acquired from
training on the lesson
for having a good
discussion.

1.95

Agree

6

1.3

Strongly
agree


2
24. I use models to
support my discussion
and to have better
understanding of the
pupils.

3.07

Moderately
agree

21

1.3

Strongly
agree


2
25. My pupils and I
integrate the new trends
of teaching and learning
process in all specific
subject areas.


2.05


Agree



12


1.52


Agree


9
26. I use strategies that
integrate multimedia
such as computer, LCD
etc. in my discussion.

2.57

Moderately
agree

20

1.5

Agree

8
27. I use incentives to
maintain the attention
of my pupils in their
learning process.

2.19

Agree


16

1.76

Agree

15
28. I try to incorporate
innovative strategies
and methodologies in my
teaching practices.

2.12

Agree


14

1.38

Strongly
agree


3
29. I modify teaching to
address a broad range of
learners readiness
interests and abilities.


2.05


Agree



12


1.8


Agree


16
30. I arrange field trips
for practical experience

2.50

Moderately

18

1.85

Agree

17
34

of the pupils. agree
31. I arrange different
activities according to
the content demand.

2.17

Agree


16

1.6

Agree

12
32. I teach every child
same material in the
same way.

2.51

Moderately
agree

19

1.85

Agree

17
33. I divide the learners
in groups according to
their abilities to
enhance their social
skills.


2.08


Agree



13


1.53


Agree


9
34. I provide such an
environment in which
talented students tend
to help average and
below average.


2.05


Agree



12


1.45


Strongly
agree



6
35. I repeat instructions
for clear understanding
of the slow learners.

1.81

Agree


1

1.3

Strongly
agree


2

Table 2.1 shows the Evaluation on the Teaching Strategies
of the Respondents. As shown in the table it implies that the
respondents in public elementary schools bring variation in
teaching strategies to reach out the pupils learning, provide a
remedial teaching after class, and the teacher respondents
repeat instruction for clear understanding of the slow learners
with a weighted mean of 1.81 and a verbal interpretation of
strongly agree. On other hand private elementary schools
presents that the teacher integrates what they have acquired
from trainings on their lessons with a weighted mean of 1.25 and
a verbal interpretation of agree. The data manifest that the
35

teachers really try to incorporate the new information in their
teaching.