I Clinical Neurosurgical Vignettes for the Oral Board and Recertification Examinations: A Self Assessment Guide by Thomas G. Psarros, Jonathan A. White, and Howard m. Morgan. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted without the prior written permission of the publisher. This publication contains information relating to general principles of medical care that should not be construed as specific instructions for individual patients.
Descrição original:
Título original
Clinical Neurosurgical Vignettes for the Oral Board and Recertification Examinations First 2 Chapters.pdf
I Clinical Neurosurgical Vignettes for the Oral Board and Recertification Examinations: A Self Assessment Guide by Thomas G. Psarros, Jonathan A. White, and Howard m. Morgan. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted without the prior written permission of the publisher. This publication contains information relating to general principles of medical care that should not be construed as specific instructions for individual patients.
I Clinical Neurosurgical Vignettes for the Oral Board and Recertification Examinations: A Self Assessment Guide by Thomas G. Psarros, Jonathan A. White, and Howard m. Morgan. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted without the prior written permission of the publisher. This publication contains information relating to general principles of medical care that should not be construed as specific instructions for individual patients.
Clinical Neurosurgical Vignettes for the Oral Board and Recertification Examinations:
A Self Assessment Guide
Thomas G. Psarros, MD Spine and Brain Neurosurgery Center Reading Hospital and Medical Center West Reading, Pennsylvania
Jonathan A. White, MD Assistant Professor and Residency Program Director Department of Neurological Surgery Birsner Family Professorship in Neurological Surgery University of Texas Southwestern School of Medicine Dallas, Texas
Howard Morgan, MD, MA., MS., FACS Professor Department of Neurological Surgery Trammell Crow Professorship in Neurological Surgery University of Texas Southwestern School of Medicine Dallas, Texas
Anotatos Publishing 2008
iv Anotatos Publishing, LLC. Allentown, Pennsylvania 18104
2008 by Anotatos Publishing, LLC.
Typeset in Times New Roman Printed in the United States
All rights including that of translation reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, including photocopying, electronic, mechanical, recording, or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the publisher.
The publisher and/or authors are not responsible (as a matter of product liability, negligence, or otherwise) for any injury resulting from any material contained herein. This publication contains information relating to general principles of medical care that should not be construed as specific instructions for individual patients. Manufacturers product information and package inserts should be reviewed for current information including contraindications, dosages, and precautions.
Library of Congress Control Number: 2007943015 Psarros, Thomas G., January 2008 Clinical Neurosurgical Vignettes for the Oral Board and Recertification Examinations: A Self Assessment Guide. Thomas G. Psarros, Jonathan A. White, Howard Morgan p. 310 Includes index and bibliographical references. ISBN-13: 978-0-9802096-0-0 ISBN-10: 0-9802096-0-9 for Library of Congress
The publishers and authors have made every effort to trace copyright holders for borrowed material and reference all material in this book in a just manner when appropriate. If they have inadvertently overlooked any, they will be pleased to make any necessary arrangements at the first opportunity.
v v
Dedication
To my young son George for making me the proudest father in the world
To my lovely wife, Sandy, for her unconditional support
vii vii Table of Contents
Case 1: Anterior interosseous nerve syndrome............................................ 1-6 Case 2: Posterior communicating artery aneurysm................................... 7-18 Case 3: Parkinsons disease ..................................................................... 19-28 Case 4: Perimesencephalic subarachnoid hemorrhage ............................ 29-36 Case 5: Middle cerebral artery aneurysm................................................ 37-46 Case 6: Normal pressure hydrocephalus.................................................. 47-52 Case 7: Trigeminal neuralgia................................................................... 53-58 Case 8: Carotid-cavernous fistula............................................................ 59-62 Case 9: Carotid stenosis........................................................................... 63-72 Case 10: Carpel tunnel syndrome .............................................................. 73-78 Case 11: Basilar apex aneurysm................................................................ 79-88 Case 12: Odontoid fracture........................................................................ 89-98 Case 13: Colloid cyst ............................................................................... 99-104 Case 14: Anterior communicating artery aneurysm.............................. 105-112 Case 15: Posterior inferior cerebellar artery aneurysm......................... 113-118 Case16: Mycotic aneurysm................................................................... 119-122 Case 17: Cerebral venous thrombosis.................................................... 123-128 Case 18: Middle cerebral artery infarct ................................................. 129-138 Case 19: Vein of Galen malformation................................................... 139-142 Case 20: Cerebral arterial venous malformation ................................... 143-150 Case 21: Cerebral amyloid angiopathy.................................................. 151-152 Case 22: Far lateral lumbar disc herniation ........................................... 153-156 Case 23: Central nervous system germinoma........................................ 157-166 Case 24: Pituitary adenoma/Cushings disease ..................................... 167-178 Case 25: Vestibular schwannoma.......................................................... 179-186 Case 26: Neurocysticercosis .................................................................. 187-192 Case 27: Myelomeningocele.................................................................. 193-198 Case 28: Lipomyelomeningocele........................................................... 199-204 Case 29: Upper brachial plexopathy...................................................... 205-210 Case 30: Closed head injury .................................................................. 211-220 Case 31: Cubital tunnel syndrome......................................................... 221-228 Case 32: Cervical spine fracture/ligamentous injury............................. 229-236 Case 33: Posterior interosseous nerve entrapment ................................ 237-240 Case 34: Isolated brain metastases......................................................... 241-248 Case 35: Thoracic spinal cord tumor ..................................................... 249-254 Case 36: Carotid artery dissection ......................................................... 255-259 Case 37: Spinal cord stimulation and failed back surgery syndrome ... 261-270 Index: .................................................................................................... 271-282 Bibliography: ......................................................................................... 283-298
ix Preface
The thought of preparing a series of books for the written neurosurgery board examination seemed to be an excellent one, but the task seemed daunting because the fund of knowledge required to pass the test was felt to be as extensive as the field of neurosurgery itself. Our first two books entitled The Definitive Neurological Surgery Board Review and Intensive Neurosurgery Board Review: Neurological Surgery Q & A primarily focused on the basic science aspects of the field in the form of a textbook and a Q & A book, respectively. This book is primarily intended for neurosurgeons preparing for the oral board and recertification examinations, although should prove useful to neurosurgical residents studying for the written examination due to the growing number of clinical-based questions popping up on this exam. It is certainly not meant to be a comprehensive or authoritative narrative on the plethora of neurosurgical topics tested, but simply a compilation of case studies that I put together while studying for the Oral Boards that may prove useful during your preparatory efforts. I primarily relied on two board-certified neurosurgeons from The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center while compiling these case studies, but have benefited tremendously from the collective experience of many others during my residency in Dallas. This book is a tribute to all of them because without their mentorship, guidance, and unselfish dedication to neurosurgical education this book would not be in your hands today.
Although every attempt has been made to ensure the clarity and accuracy of the questions and answers, the reader is referred to the multiple referenced textbooks and journal articles for further clarification should the need arise. Each vignette is generally formulated with a differential diagnosis, most likely diagnosis, treatment recommendations, and surgical approaches and techniques. This volume will serve as an eye-opening refresher for busy neurosurgeons studying for the oral board and recertification examinations, and should prove to be a valuable vehicle for rapid and systematic pre-test review for neurosurgery residents preparing for the written boards. We wish you luck during your preparatory efforts.
Thomas G. Psarros, MD Anterior interosseous nerve syndrome 1
Case 1
A 17-year-old female fractured her right forearm during a high school volleyball game and required casting. Two-months after removal of the cast she complained of a painful right hand. Her neurologic examination was normal except that she was unable to perform the maneuver depicted below with the right hand.
1. What is the most likely diagnosis? Anterior interosseous nerve (AIN) injury or compression (also known as Kiloh-Nevin syndrome) causes weakness of the long flexors of the thumb (flexor pollicis longus), index and middle fingers (flexor digitorum profundus I and II), and the pronator quadratus muscle. When one tries to pinch the index finger and thumb, the end of the fingers extend and instead of the tips of the fingers, the pulps touch producing the classic pinch sign, as depicted above. (Brazis, et al., 1996, p 14-15 ) [19] ; (Greenberg, 2001, p 540) [51] .
2. Describe the course of the AIN? The AIN originates from the posterolateral surface of the median nerve (between the two heads of the pronator teres muscle) approximately 5 to 8 cm distal to the medial epicondyle. Typically, the AIN branches just distal to the proximal border of the superficial head of the pronator teres muscle, and accompanies the median nerve through the fibrous arch of the flexor digitorum superficialis (FDS) muscle. The AIN then comes to lie in front of the interosseous membrane, coursing distally with the anterior interosseous artery (branch of the ulnar artery) to the level of the wrist. The AIN supplies motor branches to the flexor pollicis longus (FPL) muscle, flexor digitorum profundus (FDP) muscles of the index and long fingers, and pronator quadratus (PQ) muscle. The branches to the FPL and FDP muscles arise near the tendinous origin of the FDS muscle approximately 4 cm distal to AIN origin. The AIN terminates in the PQ muscle (Wilkins and Rengachary, 1996, p 3081) [161] .
3. What is the etiology of a painful hand with this syndrome? The AIN has no cutaneous innervation and is most often considered a purely motor nerve. The AIN, however, does have terminal sensory branches from the wrist radiocarpal, radioulnar, intercarpal, and carpometacarpal joints. Damage to the terminal sensory branches can cause chronic, nagging volar wrist and forearm pain (Brazis, et al., 1996, p 14-15) [19] ; (Wilkins and Rengachary, 1996, p 3081) [161] . 2 Clinical Neurosurgical Vignettes
4. What are some causes of AIN syndrome? Trauma including supracondylar humeral fracture, forearm fracture (as in this case), dislocation of the elbow, penetrating missile injury, stab wounds, and crush injuries Compression of the AIN by musculotendinous bands or other anomalous structures within the forearm (from pronator teres muscle, flexor digitorum superficialis arch) Iatrogenic injury Arterial or venous access (cutdowns, catheterization, venipuncture) Anomalous AIN course deep to pronator teres muscle Accessory muscles: Gantzers muscle, aberrant head of flexor carpi radialis muscle Forearm mass Enlarged bicipital bursa Aberrant radial artery Thrombosed ulnar collateral artery Inflammation The AIN may be involved as part of neuralgic amyotrophy Infection (cytomegalovirus) Arteritis (polyarteritis nodosa) (Brazis, et al., 1996, p 14) [19]
5. What are typical features of a complete AIN syndrome? There is a history of spontaneous pain in the proximal volar wrist and forearm. Symptoms tend to increase with activity, especially repetitive forearm motion. Weakness is usually preceded by pain, with the pain often subsiding partially or completely over weeks to months. There is classically weakness of the FPL, FDP of the index and long fingers, and PQ muscles. This often leaves patients complaining of difficulty with writing or picking up small objects. On clinical examination, the most prominent feature is weakness of the thumb FPL and index and long finger FDP muscles causing the "classic attitude" of the weak pinch (Wilkins and Rengachary, 1996, p 3081) [161] .
6. What are the typical features of an incomplete AIN syndrome and how is it usually caused? There are reports of various "incomplete AIN syndromes, also referred to as pseudo-anterior interosseous nerve syndromes. These atypical presentations may be caused by anatomic variations including:
A. The ulnar nerve may innervate the long finger (partial or complete in half the population), which will preserve the long finger FDP muscle strength.
B. The Martin-Gruber anastomosis, present in approximately 17% of the population has a connection between the median and ulnar nerves. One common variant has a connection between the anterior interosseous to ulnar nerve. In this situation, many of the ulnar-mediated hand intrinsic muscles will be affected as well.
C. The AIN may innervate the entire FDP muscle, which would result in weakness of all fingers. D. The AIN may also supply part of the FDS muscle (30% of people) (Brazis, et al., 1996, p 15) [19] . Anterior interosseous nerve syndrome 3
7. What is the differential diagnosis of AIN syndrome? The most commonly misdiagnosed problem is a tendon rupture, usually of the FPL muscle, but also of the FDP muscle. Hill reported that 10 of 33 patients with AIN syndrome were initially diagnosed as having a tendon rupture (three had FPL exploration unnecessarily) (Hill, et al., 1985, p 4- 16) [59] . Electrical stimulation of the FPL or FDP muscle can help identify the presence of an intact tendon (Howard, 1986, p 737-785) [62] . Other common conditions in the differential include acute brachial plexus neuropathy, partial proximal median nerve injury, thoracic outlet syndrome, and cervical radiculopathy (especially C8, although relatively uncommon). History, clinical examination, and electrophysiologic studies can help exclude these other entities (Brazis, et al., 1996, p 15) [19] .
8. What diagnostic studies may help confirm the diagnosis? Electromyography can help confirm the diagnoses of AIN syndrome by helping to localize the muscles affected. It may show evidence of abnormal membrane irritability with loss of motor units in any or all of the muscles supplied by the AIN. Needle examination of these muscles may prove difficult, however, due to their fairly deep location (Hill, et al., 1985, p 4-16) [59] .
9. What are some characteristics of normal and abnormal single- motor-unit potentials on electromyography (EMG)? In order to understand abnormalities on EMG, it is imperative that one have a sound understanding of how a needle EMG study is conducted and what the expected norms should be. EMG involves placing a recording needle into specific muscles and recording action potentials from muscle fibers, which can be used to determine if any pathology exists in motoneurons and/or muscles. There are generally 2 aspects of an EMG examination that merit discussion. They include: 1) assessing whether there is spontaneous muscle fiber action potentials, and 2) measuring motor unit action potential (MUAP) duration, amplitude, and phases.
Spontaneous muscle activity
When a patient is not moving and under resting conditions, muscles are essentially silent with no significant activity. If a motor neuron or muscle is damaged, however, it is common to see spontaneous muscle fiber activity on EMG due to hypersensitivity of denervated muscles. The most common spontaneous activities that have clinical significance are fibrillation potentials, positive sharp waves, and complex repetitive discharges. Fibrillation potentials are abnormal, spontaneous contractions of single muscle fibers that are not visible through the skin, but have a characteristic EMG waveform. They usually occur rhythmically and are thought to result from oscillations of the resting membrane potential in denervated muscles. They have a characteristic 4 Clinical Neurosurgical Vignettes
biphasic or triphasic waveform that can often be distinguished from normal end plate potentials. Positive sharp waves are similar to fibrillation potentials and appear on EMG as a downward wave after needle insertion, which is indicative of needle irritation of denervated muscle fibers. Denervation of muscle fibers results in fibrillation potentials and positive sharp waves within approximately two weeks, but their onset may take up to five weeks in certain cases. These findings usually persist until the muscle is reinnervated, typically within 3 to 4 months in mild injuries, or until the injured muscle undergoes complete atrophy (may take years). Complex repetitive discharges are generated from muscle fibers that have been denervated for longer periods of time (> 2 months) resulting in chronic muscle fiber necrosis. The disorders causing complex repetitive discharges are similar to the ones causing fibrillation potentials and positive sharp waves, except that complex repetitive discharges occur with chronic disease states. Insertional activity is the discharge of a single muscle fiber during insertion of the EMG needle, and does not necessarily indicate abnormality unless significantly increased activity is seen (Winn and Youmans, 2004, p 3856- 3857) [162] .
MUAP amplitude, duration, and phases
Muscle potentials appear normally as waveforms with duration of 5-15 ms, 2-4 phases, and amplitude of 0.5-3 mV. The size of the MUAP is related to the number of muscle fibers within the recording range of the EMG needle. If the MUAP is larger than normal (increased amplitude and duration), there must be an increased number of summated action potentials per motor unit. An increased number of muscle fibers per motor unit are usually the result of reinnervation of a previously injured nerve, suggesting that there was some insult to the motor nerve approximately 2 months earlier. If the MUAP is smaller than normal (decreased amplitude and duration), there is decreased number of muscle fibers per motor unit, which generally occurs with neuromuscular junction disorders or myopathies. Polyphasic units (greater than 4 phases) are abnormal, and can be seen in both neurogenic and myogenic disorders. With neurogenic disorders, however, motor units have a longer duration and higher amplitude than normal potentials, while with myopathic potentials, they are just the opposite (shorter durations and smaller amplitudes) (Rowland and Merritt, 2000, p 75-76) [136] ; (Winn and Youmans, 2004, p 3856-3857) [162] .
10. What are the treatment options for AIN syndrome? The treatment of patients with AIN syndrome depends primarily on the cause of the injury. Closed crush injuries or those related to musculoskeletal trauma are usually treated expectantly. Patients are oftentimes followed closely with serial clinical examinations and diagnostic studies (electromyograms), and, if, after 3 to 4 months there is no recovery, surgery is considered. Most insidious or spontaneous cases are initially treated nonoperatively, as well. Immediate exploration is usually indicated for penetrating trauma.
Anterior interosseous nerve syndrome 5
Nonoperative treatment
The initial treatment is generally rest, avoidance of aggravating factors, splinting, and nonsteroidal anti- inflammatory medication. If signs/symptoms persist, some have advocated corticosteroid injections into the region of the pronator teres muscle. Controversy arises as to the duration of conservative or nonsurgical treatment. The surgical literature generally still supports nonoperative treatment for 2 to 3 months. If there is no improvement, surgical exploration is advocated. When the deficit is partial or slowly improving, the observation period can be extended.
In spontaneous or unexplained cases, treatment depends upon whether compression or inflammation is the suspected cause. Features suggestive of entrapment include slow development, mild pain (primarily volar wrist/forearm pain), or neurological deficits isolated to the AIN. Inflammation may be suspected if the pain is severe, extends above the elbow into the shoulder region, precedes the neurological deficit by a matter of days, and/or there is an associated ipsilateral or contralateral brachial plexopathy.
If inflammation is suspected, some suggest that nonsurgical treatment be carried out for 6 months, while others argue it may not be needed at all since reports document improvement even beyond 2.5 years (Hill, et al., 1985, p 4-16) [59] . All patients in one report experienced full recovery when treated without surgery (England and Sumner, 1987, p 60) [41] . The surgical literature suggests exploration at 3 months if entrapment is the suspected cause after a trial of nonsurgical therapy (Kaye and Black, 2000, p 2092) [77] .
Operative Treatment
The operative treatment is generally similar to the techniques used for the pronator syndrome. A curvilinear incision can be made on the anteromedial side of the arm approximately 8 cm above the elbow, and carried across the flexor crease into the midforearm. The median nerve can then be identified proximal to the take-off of the AIN and followed distally being sure it is decompressed at all potential sites of entrapment.
Approximately 4-5 cm above the elbow, one needs to look for a fibrous band connecting the medial epicondyle to a rare bony prominence of the humerus called the ligament of Struthers. It only occurs in about 2% of the population, but if identified, needs to be divided. The next common entrapment site of the median nerve is at the lacertus fibrosis, which arises from the biceps tendon. The median nerve generally runs under the lacertus fibrosis, which may cause entrapment if hypertrophic or fibrotic. The median nerve then courses between the two heads of the pronator teres muscle. At the level of the pronator teres muscle, the AIN arises from the median nerve. Together they may be entrapped by a fibrotic pronator teres muscle, especially adjacent to the deep or ulnar head of this muscle. The deep head of the pronator teres muscle can be divided to relieve the compression on the nerve if the ulnar head is fibrotic or hypertrophic. The dissection is then carried distally to the level of the 6 Clinical Neurosurgical Vignettes
sublimis bridge, which is the fibrous arch of the flexor digitorum superficialis muscle. The AIN travels under the sublimis bridge, and needs to be transected to relieve any compression on the AIN. The AIN is then followed further distally to ensure there is no entrapment from anomalous muscle origins (i.e. Gantzer's muscle, flexor carpi radialis brevis muscle). Dissection adjacent to the origin of the AIN may be difficult due to a constellation of multiple small arteries and veins that tend to congregate near origin of the FDS muscle, which need to be preserved (Kaye and Black, 2000, p 2092-2093) [77] ; (Wilkins and Rengachary, 1996, p 3081) [161] ; (Winn and Youmans, 2004, p 3925) [162]
(Batjer and Loftus, 2003, p 1757) [13] .
End of case Posterior communicating artery aneurysm 7
Case 2
A 62-year-old female with a history of malignant hypertension and aortic valve insufficiency was brought to the emergency room by paramedics complaining of severe headache, neck stiffness, and photophobia. There was no history of trauma. On examination, she was fully alert with no ocular gaze restriction or neurological deficit. Her noncontrast computed tomography (CT) scan is depicted below.
1. As the consulting neurosurgeon, you inform the emergency room physician that the next course of action should include? After making a diagnosis of subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) by CT scan (will demonstrate blood in 85% of patients scanned within 48 hours), cerebral angiography should be performed as soon as possible. Traditional catheter-based angiography remains the gold standard for diagnosing cerebral aneurysms, although other imaging modalities are gaining widespread popularity including computed tomographic angiography (CTA) and magnetic resonance angiography (MRA).
During cerebral angiography, it is imperative to identify the entire course of blood vessels in two planes, including the posterior inferior cerebellar arteries and anterior communicating artery complex. The angiogram should demonstrate, if possible, the etiology of the SAH, the aneurysmal neck and projection, the vessels arising next to the aneurysm, determine whether multiple aneurysms exist (up to 20% of cases), and assess the degree of concomitant vasospasm that may be present (although vasospasm is extremely unlikely in the hours immediately following a SAH) (Hughes, 2003, p 253) [63] .
The experience with MRA is rapidly evolving as acquisition protocols and MRI technology improve. Earlier studies suggest 86% sensitivity in detecting aneurysms greater than 3 mm compared to digital subtraction angiography (Ross, et al., 1990, p 449- 456) [135] ; (Ronkainen, et al., 1997, p 380-384) [133] , while other studies show that MRA sensitivity approaches 95% when compared to angiography (Atlas, 1994, p 1-16) [9] . The false positive rate for MRA is approximately 16% (Ronkainen, et al., 1997, p 380- 384) [133] . There are a number of variables that affect MRAs ability to detect aneurysms including: aneurysm size, rate and direction of blood flow in the aneurysm in relation to the magnetic field, thrombosis, and calcification. Moreover, it has limited 8 Clinical Neurosurgical Vignettes
resolution in the setting of vasospasm and in detecting blood products in the acute period following SAH. MRI, however, has proven invaluable and highly effective in the evaluation of giant intracranial aneurysms. Because giant aneurysms are often partially thrombosed, they often opacify incompletely during angiography, which can result in an underestimation of their true size (Hackney, et al., 1986, p 878-880) [53] ; (Barboriak and Provenzale, 1998, p 1469) [10] ; (Greenberg, 2001, p 757) [51] .
CTA is a more recent development, and its role is becoming better defined. Evidence suggests that it has similar sensitivity to conventional angiography in detecting aneurysms, and its use among cerebrovascular surgeons for surgical planning has steadily grown. It has a reported sensitivity and specificity of 95% and 83%, respectively, in detecting aneurysms as small as 2.2 mm. Unlike conventional angiography, however, CTA has the advantage of showing a 3-dimensional image and demonstrating the aneurysms relationship to adjacent structures. Bone artifact may hinder adequate visualization of certain aneurysms adjacent to the skull base (Anderson, et al., 1997, p 522-528) [6] ; (Zouaoui, et al., 1997, p 125-130) [170] ; (Greenberg, 2001, p 758) [51] ; (Korogi, et al., 1999, p 497) [85] ; (Liang, et al., 1995, p 1497) [90] .
Lumbar puncture (LP) after SAH is risky, and should not be performed in the patient presented here. In one study, 13% of patients undergoing lumbar puncture after SAH deteriorated neurologically. Whether or not clinical deterioration was related to the LP is unclear, but since it carries a risk of brain herniation or aneurysmal rebleeding, this procedure should generally be reserved for patients where the diagnosis remains uncertain following CT scanning.
Xanthochromia develops only after red blood cells lyse, and is usually detectable after 4 hours, is maximal at 1 week, and is typically undetectable by 3 weeks. If cerebrospinal fluid is bloody due to SAH, the blood will usually not clot if left to stand (Duffy, 1982, p 1163-1164) [35] .
2. What is the clinical Hunt and Hess grade of this patient? Once a diagnosis of SAH has been established, patients are given a clinical grade based on one of the accepted grading schemes. Although numerous grading scales have been devised since the 1930s, one of the most universally accepted grading scales is that of Hunt and Hess, described originally in 1968 (see Table 2.2a). Table 2.2a Hunt and Hess clinical grading scale after SAH
Grade Clinical symptomatology Grade I Awake, mild headache, +nuchal rigidity Grade II Awake, moderate- to- severe headaches, nuchal rigidity Grade III Drowsy or confused +focal deficits Grade IV Stuporous, mild- to- moderate hemiparesis, and signs of increased intracranial pressure Grade V Comatose, severe disability, severe increased intracranial pressure Posterior communicating artery aneurysm 9
Of note, the Hunt and Hess grading scale places the patient into the next worse grade if serious systemic disease or vasospasm is present (Hunt and Hess, 1968, p 14-20) [64] . This grading scale was later revised by Hunt in 1974 to include two additional grades. Grade 0 was added to include patients with unruptured aneurysms without symptoms, and grade 1a to include patients with no acute meningeal reaction, but a fixed neurological deficit (Hunt and Kosnik, 1974, p 79- 84) [65] . The patient in this case presented with a severe headache, photophobia, nuchal rigidity, and no decline in her level of consciousness; all characteristic of a Hunt and Hess grade II category. Her comorbid conditions (malignant hypertension and aortic valve insufficiency), however, drop her one grade into a grade III category (Hughes, 2003, p 255-256) [63] .
Although the Hunt and Hess grading system remains the most widely used grading scale for patient assessment following SAH, some have proposed using other scales to improve predictive value. For example, Oshiro, et al., developed a grading scale (World Federation of Neurological Surgeons, WFNS) based on the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS). In the WFNS grading scheme, GCS scores of 15, 12-14, 9-11, 6-8, and 3-5 replaced the Hunt and Hess scores of 1-5, respectively (see Table 2.2b). The authors of this scale (WFNS) felt that their grading scheme was better than the Hunt and Hess system at predicting overall patient outcomes while at the same time being more reproducible across observers (Hughes, 2003, p 255- 256) [63] ; (Oshiro, et al., 1997, p 140- 148) [115] .
Table 2.2b World Federation of Neurological Surgeons Scale
3. What is the Fisher grade of this patient? Fisher (1980) developed a four-tiered grading scale for the appearance of SAH on CT scanning dependent upon the severity and location of the blood pattern. Grade I patients had no evidence of blood detectable on CT scanning, while grade II patients had a thin layer of blood (< 1 mm thick) diffusely spread throughout the subarachnoid space. Grade III patients had a thicker amount of cisternal subarachnoid blood (>1mm thickness as depicted in this case), while grade IV patients had intraventricular or intraparenchymal blood with or without a significant subarachnoid component. The Fisher grading system can help predict the probability of developing vasospasm by the amount of blood detected on CT scan . Patients with Grade I, II, and IV bleeds had no or minimal incidence of clinically significant vasospasm, while grade III patients had a 95.8% incidence in Grade Clinical findings Grade I Glasgow coma score 15, no motor deficit Grade II Glasgow coma score 13 14, no motor deficit Grade III Glasgow coma score 13 14, motor deficit Grade IV Glasgow coma score 7 12, with or without motor deficit Grade V Glasgow coma score 3 6, with or without motor deficit 10 Clinical Neurosurgical Vignettes
Fishers original paper (Fisher, et al., 1977, p 1-9) [44] . These findings suggest that blood breakdown products are an important factor in the genesis of cerebral vasospasm, with larger quantities of blood increasing the likelihood that vasospasm will occur (Hughes, 2003, p 252) [63] .
4. The cerebral angiogram for this patient is depicted below. What is the diagnosis?
This angiogram of the left internal carotid artery (ICA) depicts a bilobed posterior communicating artery (PcomA) aneurysm originating at the level of a fetal PcomA (Wilkins and Rengachary, 1996, p 2306) [161] .
5. Describe two angiographic findings in this patient that are important for surgical planning? Care needs to be taken when evaluating angiograms of patients with a PComA aneurysm, SAH, and no third nerve deficit because the aneurysms often project laterally onto the medial edge of the temporal lobe rather than in more common posterolateral or downward directions. This is important during surgical planning since premature retraction of the temporal lobe may result in aneurysm rupture. Additionally, the integrity of a fetal PComA needs to be preserved during surgery and aneurysm clip placement. If the area supplied by the PComA is small, inadvertently placing this vessel into the clip construct may not cause any adverse sequelae, however, if the PComA is fetal or there is a hypoplastic P 1 , it may result in a clinically significant PCA infarct (Wilkins and Rengachary, 1996, p 2306) [161] ; (Psarros, 2006, p 199) [124] .
6. The emergency room physician reviews the CT scan with you and wants to begin an infusion of epsilon-aminocaproic acid (AMICAR). What are some important factors to consider about this medication? The role of antifibrinolytics for the purpose of preventing or decreasing clot breakdown following SAH is controversial (Kassell, et al., 1984, p 225-230) [74] ; (Adams, 1982, p 256- 259) [2] ; (Mizoi, et al., 1991, p 807- 813) [99] ; (Findlay, et al., 1988, p 723- 735) [43] . During normal fibrinolysis, Posterior communicating artery aneurysm 11
plasminogen is converted to plasmin, which facilitates the digestion of fibrin and aids in clot lysis. AMICAR inhibits the conversion of plasminogen to plasmin, and reduces the extent of fibrinolysis and clot breakdown after SAH. Intravenous injection of AMICAR generally peaks in the bloodstream in about 20 minutes. It crosses the blood-brain barrier and achieves maximal antifibrinolytic activity within the cerebrospinal fluid approximately 48 hours later (Findlay, et al., 1988, p 723-735) [43] . A typical regimen includes infusing 2 g/ hour intravenously for 48 hours, and then 1.5 g/ hour until surgery is performed. Review of the results of one study found a reduction in rehemorrhage and death at 14 days from 21% to 10% with its use (Burchiel, et al., 1984, p 57- 63) [21] . Although it halved the rebleeding rate the first 14 days following SAH, there was an increased risk in associated medical morbidity, the most frequent being diarrhea in approximately 24% of patients. Additionally, communicating hydrocephalus was 25% more likely with antifibrinolytic therapy (Burchiel, et al., 1984, p 57-63) [21] . The greatest concern over its use, however, was the increased risk of vasospasm that negated its benefits in some studies (Kassell, et al., 1984, p 225-230) [74] . The general consensus about the role of antifibrinolytics is that they have little role in acute SAH, especially if surgery is anticipated within a few hours or days of admission (Hughes, 2003, p 267) [63] .
7. What is the rate of rebleeding following a SAH? The frequency of rebleeding is in the range of 4% within the first 24 to 48 hours, and approximately 1.5% each day for the next 13 or 14 days. It approaches 20% within the first 2 weeks, and approximately 50% at 6 months. Thereafter, the risk is believed to level off to approximately 3% per year. The mortality rate from aneurysmal rebleeding is between 44% and 78%. Early surgery or aneurysm coiling offers the best protection against rebleeding and its attendant complications (Hughes, 2003, p 267) [63] ; (Kassell, et al., 1982, p 337- 343) [73] . 12 Clinical Neurosurgical Vignettes
8. What are some advantages and disadvantages of early versus delayed surgery after SAH? Table 2.8 Advantages and disadvantages of early versus delayed surgery after SAH
Despite the potential microsurgical challenges associated with operating on a swollen brain, the majority of grade I-III patients at various institutions still undergo surgery early after SAH to minimize the incidence of rebleeding. Although early surgery can certainly be technically more challenging, experience has shown that patient outcomes are not necessarily adversely affected, as demonstrated by the International Cooperative Study on the Timing of Aneurysm Surgery (ICSTAS) (Kassell, et al., 1990, p 37- 47) [75] . Intraoperative ventriculostomy placement and aggressive gravity drainage of cerebrospinal fluid have proven to be very useful in overcoming an initially swollen brain soon after SAH (Paine, et al., 1988, p 1107- 1109) [117] .
9. The patient is taken to the operating room for aneurysm clipping. After elevating a pterionally-centered bone flap and modestly craniectomizing the squamosal portion of the temporal bone, attention is directed toward the sphenoid ridge. This bony wing is typically removed from lateral to medial to the level of origin of what structure? One of the most useful adjuncts to avoid brain retraction for anterior circulation aneurysms during initial exposure is to aggressively remove the bony wing (or sphenoid ridge) of the sphenoid bone. It is removed using rongeurs and a power drill from lateral to medial for a distance of approximately 4 cm, to the level of the orbital meningeal artery. This maneuver must include removing the thin spine of the sphenoid ridge, which, oftentimes, is very adherent to the underlying dura adjacent to the horizontal portion of the Sylvian fissure. If the spine is left intact, the degree of initial frontal lobe elevation necessary to expose the carotid cistern Early approach Delayed approach ADVANTAGES ADVANTAGES Decreases rebleeding risk Allows for aggressive management of vasospasm Early removal of subarachnoid blood and possible prevention of hydrocephalus Earlier patient ambulation and rehabilitation; perhaps reduced hospital stay Reduced medical complications associated with bedrest Evacuation of hematoma, if applicable Brain less swollen Easier microdissection Stable patient DISADVANTAGES DISADVANTAGES Swollen brain may make surgery more difficult Unstable patient in some instances Scheduling problems, possibility of inexperienced operative team Higher rebleeding risk Does not facilitate or allow for aggressive management of vasospasm Delayed ambulation, longer hospital stay Increased risk of medical complications while awaiting surgery Posterior communicating artery aneurysm 13
is increased, and surgical access along the flattened ridge and frontal fossa floor can be markedly hindered. After the sphenoid ridge is removed and bony and dural hemostasis is obtained, the dura can be opened in a routine curvilinear fashion and held with retention sutures flat against the inferior aspect of the craniectomy and adjacent muscle (Samson and Batjer, 1990, p 57) [138] .
10. Describe the pertinent steps during surgery for a PcomA aneurysm? Initial exposure after dura opened
In Intracranial Aneurysm Surgery: Techniques, Samson and Batjer eloquently describe the steps for clipping PcomA aneurysms (Samson and Batjer, 1990, p 57-58) [138] . With the aid of a microscope, a small self- retaining brain retractor is used to gently elevate the frontal lobe adjacent to the horizontal portion of the Sylvian fissure. The retractor is then advanced in a step-by-step fashion as the arachnoid opening is extended from the horizontal portion of the Sylvian fissure to its junction with the carotid cistern. As frontal lobe elevation brings the optic nerve and internal carotid artery (ICA) covered by arachnoid into view, the arachnoid covering the Sylvian fissure usually thickens. Oftentimes, a small vein will be found bridging the temporal to frontal lobe immediately under this thicker arachnoidal layer adjacent to the Sylvian fissure. This vein usually lies above the origin of the middle cerebral artery (MCA), and can be coagulated and cut to complete the opening of the horizontal portion of the Sylvian fissure. The retractor blade can then be advanced to expose the arachnoid layer that surrounds the optic nerve and ICA. The arachnoid incision, which was started over the horizontal portion of the Sylvian fissure, is then extended posteriorly and anteriorly for better visualization of the ICA and optic nerve. The release of cerebrospinal fluid from the subarachnoid Sylvian and prechiasmatic cisterns will generally help relax the brain to facilitate further microdissection and eventual aneurysm clipping (Samson and Batjer, 1990, p 57-58) [138] .
Microdissection after basal cisterns open
After the basal cisterns open, the next step should be to focus attention on securing proximal arterial control prior to more definitive microdissection distally. Because of the most common location of PComA aneurysms (projecting posterior and laterally), it is advantageous to accomplish this control by beginning the exposure of the ICA on its anterior-medial aspect at the apex of the opticocarotid triangle and then carrying the microdissection laterally, across the ICA. This should complete the establishment of proximal arterial control and simultaneously establish initial exposure of the proximal aneurysm complex in most cases. Initial microdissection of thickened arachnoid and clot in the posterior carotid cistern should be limited to meticulous proximal-to- distal exposure of the ICA only, as the surgeon defines in succession the following vessels: the origin of the posterior communicating artery, posterior communicating artery (PCA)- proximal aneurysm junction, aneurysm neck, the distal origin of the aneurysm 14 Clinical Neurosurgical Vignettes
neck from the carotid wall, and finally the anterior choroidal artery origin. Extensive removal of subarachnoid clot or identification of the distal posterior communicating and anterior choroidal vessels or aneurysm fundus should be postponed until satisfactory exposure of the entire posterior carotid wall has been exposed to permit safe and early distal temporary arterial control, should it be necessary. In most instances, distal control of the ICA is obtained, if necessary, by placing a temporary clip just proximal to the ICA bifurcation. After appropriate preparations have been made for proximal and distal arterial control and with satisfactory preliminary inspection of the posterior, anterior and medial carotid walls, the surgeon is nearly ready to begin definitive dissection of the aneurysm neck in preparation for clip application (Samson and Batjer, 1990, p 57- 65) [138] .
It is first important to identify the distal PComA for temporary clip placement, if possible, because obtaining proximal and distal control of the ICA may not be enough to stop back bleeding from the PComA if intraoperative rupture occurs. Sometimes, this can significantly hinder visualization and make further microdissection and aneurysm clipping difficult. Moreover, if the PComA is not identified prior to clip placement, the surgeon runs the risk of including this vessel into the clip construct, especially if vision is impaired by intraoperative rupture (Samson and Batjer, 1990, p 63) [138] ; (Psarros, 2006, p 199) [124] .
11. Postoperatively, the patient was found to have a homonymous visual field defect of both upper and lower quadrants. This was most likely the result of intra- operative injury to what structure/s? Occlusion of the anterior choroidal artery (AchA) may cause a homonymous defect in the upper and lower quadrants with sparing of the horizontal sector (quadruple sectoranopia), which is diagnostic of a lateral geniculate body infarct in the AchA distribution. Injury or ligation of this vessel may also produce the classically reported features of contralateral hemiplegia, hemianesthesia, and hemianopsia (Brazis, et al., 1996, p 132-140) [19] ; (Psarros, 2006, p 199) [124] .
The AchA arises from the ICA in 75% of patients, but can arise from either the MCA or PcomA in up to 25% of patients. The AchA supplies: 1) the temporal lobe - uncus, pyriform cortex, and a portion of the amygdala; 2) the visual system - optic tract, lateral geniculate nucleus, and a portion of the optic radiations; 3) the internal capsule and basal ganglia - medial globus pallidus, tail of caudate, genu and posterior limb of internal capsule; 4) the diencephalon - lateral thalamus and subthalamus; 5) the mesencephalon - middle one-third of cerebral peduncle and substantia nigra.
Generally, the sites for temporary clip placement chosen during surgery for PComA aneurysms include the proximal ICA near the anterior clinoid process, on the distal ICA immediately proximal to the carotid bifurcation, and on the PComA distal to the aneurysm Posterior communicating artery aneurysm 15
fundus. Obviously, the territory supplied by the AchA will be rendered ischemic during the period of temporary occlusion, which can result in a choroidal infarct should prolonged temporary occlusion time be necessary.
Samson and Batjer describe the following steps for clipping a PcomA aneurysm after preparation of the vessels to receive temporary clips (Samson and Batjer, 1990, p 57- 58) [138] . The arterial blood pressure should be normalized, and either etomidate (0.3 mg/kg) or a barbiturate (often pentobarbital) should be given to achieve burst suppression. Subsequently, temporary clips are applied from proximal to distal, and the aneurysm fundus could be more aggressively manipulated. If necessary, a small gauge spinal needle could be used to puncture the aneurysm dome (for larger aneurysms), well away from the aneurysm neck for easier manipulation. The suction can then be intermittently placed over the puncture site and despite continued bleeding of the PcomA (if temporary clip application not possible), suction will transiently decompress the aneurysm adequately enough to allow dissection to progress sufficiently to permit permanent clip placement. Should protracted microdissection be required, at intervals of approximately 10 to 15 minutes, a small cottonoid can be placed over the puncture site and the temporary clips removed to allow for reperfusion of the carotid (and anterior choroidal artery) territory, with the bleeding from the aneurysm being controlled with suction and tamponade (Samson and Batjer, 1990, p 63- 64) [138] . 12. What percent of patients with aneurysmal SAH develop angiographic and clinical vasospasm? Vasospasm is one of the greatest causes of morbidity in patients surviving the initial SAH. Angiographic vasospasm has been reported to occur in approximately 70% of patients following SAH, with approximately 20-30% having clinically significant narrowing. It has a peak incidence around the seventh day following SAH, although it can occur anytime up to approximately 13- 14 days post-bleed, beyond of which it is fairly uncommon (Heros, et al., 1983, p 599-608) [58] ; (Ropper and Zervas, 1984, p 909-915) [134] . When vasospasm develops, it may last for several weeks (Heros, et al., 1983, p 599-608) [58] ; (Weir, 1982, p 39-43) [157] . The most common indicator predisposing to vasospasm is the amount of subarachnoid blood on the CT scan. Thick blood in the basal cisterns (Fisher grade III) carries a higher vasospasm risk than focal loculations (Fisher, et al., 1977, p 245- 248) [44] . Lobar hematomas and interhemispheric blood are associated with a low risk of vasospasm, while subarachnoid blood in the Sylvian fissure appears to carry an intermediate vasospasm risk (Pasqualin, et al., 1984, p 344-353) [118] ; (Kistler, et al., 1983, p 424-436) [81] .
16 Clinical Neurosurgical Vignettes
13. On postoperative day 9 the patient developed new right arm and leg weakness while recovering in the ICU, but her level of consciousness remained unchanged. Her ventriculostomy continued to function properly. This neurologic change from baseline was preceded by slight fever and leukocytosis. What should be the next course of action in this patients care? Clinical vasospasm usually develops slowly over hours or days and may be associated with a slow decline in neurologic status. Headache, fever, and leukocytosis may precede and herald the onset of vasospasm prior to neurological deterioration. Permanent neurological deficit or death has been reported to occur in approximately 12% of patients who develop severe clinical vasospasm (Heros, et al., 1983, p 599-608) [58] ; (Fisher, et al., 1977, p 245-248) [44] . Although this clinical history is highly suggestive of vasospasm, obtaining an emergent CT scan in the face of a new neurologic deficit is often the first step in management. This is done to rule out any structural abnormality (hemorrhage, hydrocephalus, etc.) that may require alternative treatment strategies.
14. What is the mainstay of treatment of clinically significant cerebral vasospasm? In the chapter on management of SAH in Neurological Emergencies, Kopitnik, et al., give a thorough discussion on the management of cerebral vasospasm, which is summarized below (Hughes, 2003, p 278-281) [63] . Presently, the mainstay of treatment for clinically significant cerebral vasospasm is the induction of hypervolemia, systemic hypertension, and hemodilution, commonly referred to as triple-H therapy or hyperdynamic therapy. The neurologic deficits seen with vasospasm result from arterial narrowing and increased cerebrovascular resistance. Autoregulation is often disrupted following SAH, and any intervention/s that increase cerebral perfusion pressure can increase cerebral blood flow in the hypoperfused regions of the brain and potentially improve outcomes (Symon, 1979, p 7-22) [150] ; (Pritz, et al., 1978, p 364-368) [123] . Patients undergoing Triple H therapy are best treated in an intensive care unit (ICU) environment with arterial and central venous lines, an indwelling foley catheter, and pulse oximetry. An arterial catheter or A-line assesses blood pressure continuously and lends itself well to frequent blood draws for blood gas measurements should they be necessary. A SwanGanz catheter monitors pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (or central venous pressure if central venous line is used), a transcutaneous pulse oximeter monitors oxygen saturation, and an indwelling foley catheter can be a useful adjunct to arterial and central venous lines to gauge volume status and certain urine electrolytes. Desaturations may indicate early pulmonary decompensation from hypervolemic therapy. Fluid balance is assessed hourly.
Specifically, the initial therapy for symptomatic vasospasm consists of volume expansion with crystalloid and/or albumin to create a positive Posterior communicating artery aneurysm 17
fluid balance. Pulmonary artery wedge pressure is generally maintained between 14 and 18 mm Hg and central venous pressure is kept at approximately 10 mm Hg. If clinical improvement is not seen soon after volume expansion or blood pressure can not adequately be raised with volume expansion alone, arterial blood pressure can be elevated with dopamine, dobutamine, and/or norepinephrine and systolic pressures typically maintained between 180 and 220 mm Hg. Kassell reported good results in 58 patients treated for cerebral vasospasm with volume expansion and induced arterial hypertension in which he demonstrated reversal of neurological deficits in 75% of patients. Neurological improvement was permanent in 74% of patients (Kassell, et al., 1982, p 337-343) [73] . As intravascular volume is expanded, patients, oftentimes, undergo a secondary diuresis, which can make artificial elevation of the pulmonary capillary wedge pressure difficult. Under these circumstances, the use of low dose vasopressin can help minimize the diuresis and maintain an elevated intravascular fluid volume, if necessary. Triple H therapy can be continued until one of the following conditions are met: neurologic symptoms resolve, vasospasm clears as demonstrated by arteriography or Doppler monitoring, or complications from hyperdynamic therapy occur. Complications may include congestive heart failure, brain edema, pulmonary edema, hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage, systemic complications of prolonged vasopressor use, and myocardial infarction (Shimoda, et al., 1993, p 423-429) [145] . Calcium channel blockers may improve SAH patient outcome (nimodipine 60 mg orally every four hours for 21 days) and are now part of the overall management algorithm at most institutions. Their efficacy in reducing the detrimental effects of vasospasm has been shown in controlled studies, (Allen, et al., 1983, p 619-624) [5] although the true mechanism of action remains somewhat elusive (Kassell, et al., 1992, p 848-852) [72] .
When hyperdynamic therapy has proven ineffective, other interventions may prove useful. Selective intra- arterial infusion of papaverine hydrochloride or calcium channel blockers into the symptomatic vascular territory may reverse angiographic vasospasm in some patients. The results of this therapy can be clinically dramatic but, in a similar fashion, may be extremely fleeting or completely unsuccessful (Minami, et al., 2001, p 169-179) [98] . Additionally, transluminal balloon angioplasty of the large intracranial vessels (ICA, M 1 segment of MCA, vertebral and basilar arteries) may also prove beneficial. A number of investigators have reported encouraging results with the use of these techniques (Zubkov, et al., 1984, p 65-79) [171] ; (Newell, et al., 1989, p 654-660) [106] ; (Hughes, 2003, p 278- 281) [63] .