Você está na página 1de 20

3-1

Chapter 3

Audit Reports


Review Questions

3-1 Auditor's reports are important to users of financial statements because
they inform users of the auditor's opinion as to whether or not the financial
statements are fairly stated or whether no conclusion can be made with regard to
the fairness of their presentation. Users especially look for any deviation from the
wording of the standard unqualified report and the reasons and implications of
such deviations. Having standard wording improves communications for the benefit
of users of the auditors report. When there are departures from the standard
wording, users are more likely to recognize and consider situations requiring a
modification or qualification to the auditors report or opinion.

3-2 The unqualified audit report consists of:

1. Report title Auditing standards require that the report be titled and
that the title includes the word independent.
2. Audit report address The report is usually addressed to the company,
its stockholders, or the board of directors.
3. Introductory paragraph The first paragraph of the report does three
things: first, it makes the simple statement that the CPA firm has
done an audit. Second, it lists the financial statements that were
audited, including the balance sheet dates and the accounting
periods for the income statement and statement of cash flows.
Third, it states that the statements are the responsibility of
management and that the auditor's responsibility is to express an
opinion on the statements based on an audit.
4. Scope paragraph. The scope paragraph is a factual statement about
what the auditor did in the audit. The remainder briefly describes
important aspects of an audit.
5. Opinion paragraph. The final paragraph in the standard report
states the auditor's conclusions based on the results of the audit.
6. Name of CPA firm. The name identifies the CPA firm or practitioner
who performed the audit.
7. Audit report date. The appropriate date for the report is the end of
fieldwork, when the auditor has gathered sufficient appropriate
evidence to support the opinion.

The same seven parts are found in a qualified report as in an unqualified
report. There are also often one or more additional paragraphs explaining reasons
for the qualifications.

3-2
3-3 The purposes of the scope paragraph in the auditor's report are to inform
the financial statement users that the audit was conducted in accordance with
generally accepted auditing standards, in general terms what those standards
mean, and whether the audit provides a reasonable basis for an opinion.
The information in the scope paragraph includes:

1. The auditor followed generally accepted auditing standards.
2. The audit is designed to obtain reasonable assurance about whether
the statements are free of material misstatement.
3. Discussion of the audit evidence accumulated.
4. Statement that the auditor believes the evidence accumulated was
appropriate for the circumstances to express the opinion presented.

3-4 The purpose of the opinion paragraph is to state the auditor's conclusions
based upon the results of the audit evidence. The most important information in
the opinion paragraph includes:

1. The words "in our opinion" which indicate that the conclusions are
based on professional judgment.
2. A restatement of the financial statements that have been audited
and the dates thereof or a reference to the introductory paragraph.
3. A statement about whether the financial statements were presented
fairly and in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles.

3-5 The auditor's report should be dated February 17, 2012, the date on which
the auditor concluded that he or she had sufficient appropriate evidence to support
the auditors opinion.

3-6 An unqualified report may be issued under the following five circumstances:

1. All statementsbalance sheet, income statement, statement of
retained earnings, and statement of cash flowsare included in the
financial statements.
2. The three general standards have been followed in all respects on
the engagement.
3. Sufficient appropriate evidence has been accumulated and the
auditor has conducted the engagement in a manner that enables
him or her to conclude that the three standards of field work have
been met.
4. The financial statements are presented in accordance with appropriate
accounting standards such as generally accepted accounting principles
or IFRS. This also means that adequate disclosures have been
included in the footnotes and other parts of the financial statements.
5. There are no circumstances requiring the addition of an explanatory
paragraph or modification of the wording of the report.
3-3
3-7 The introductory, scope and opinion paragraphs are modified to include
reference to managements report on internal control over financial reporting, and
the scope of the auditors work and opinion on internal control over financial
reporting. The introductory and opinion paragraphs also refer to the framework
used to evaluate internal control. Two additional paragraphs are added between
the scope and opinion paragraphs that define internal control and describe the
inherent limitations of internal control.

3-8 When adherence to generally accepted accounting principles would result
in misleading financial statements there should be a complete explanation in a
separate paragraph. The separate paragraph should fully explain the departure
and the reason why generally accepted accounting principles would have
resulted in misleading statements. The opinion should be unqualified, but it
should refer to the separate paragraph during the portion of the opinion in which
generally accepted accounting principles are mentioned.

3-9 An unqualified report with an explanatory paragraph or modified wording is
the same as a standard unqualified report except that the auditor believes it is
necessary to provide additional information about the audit or the financial
statements. For a qualified report, either there is a scope limitation (condition 1)
or a failure to follow generally accepted accounting principles (condition 2).
Under either condition, the auditor concludes that the overall financial statements
are fairly presented.
Two examples of an unqualified report with an explanatory paragraph
or modified wording are:

1. The entity changed from one generally accepted accounting principle
to another generally accepted accounting principle.
2. A shared report involving the use of other auditors.

3-10 When another CPA has performed part of the audit, the primary auditor
issues one of the following types of reports based on the circumstances.

1. No reference is made to the other auditor. This will occur if the
other auditor audited an immaterial portion of the statement, the
other auditor is known or closely supervised, or if the principal
auditor has thoroughly reviewed the other auditor's work.
2. Issue a shared opinion in which reference is made to the other
auditor. This type of report is issued when it is impractical to review
the work of the other auditor or when a portion of the financial
statements audited by the other CPA is material in relation to the
total.
3. The report may be qualified if the principal auditor is not willing to
assume any responsibility for the work of the other auditor. A
disclaimer may be issued if the segment audited by the other CPA
is highly material.
3-4
3-11 Even though the prior year statements have been restated to enhance
comparability, a separate explanatory paragraph is required to explain the
change in generally accepted accounting principles in the first year in which the
change took place.

3-12 Changes that affect the consistency of the financial statements may
involve any of the following:

a. Change in accounting principle
b. Change in reporting entity
c. Corrections of errors involving accounting principles.

An example of a change that affects consistency would be a change in the
method of computing depreciation from straight line to an accelerated method. A
separate explanatory paragraph is required if the amounts are material.
Comparability refers to items such as changes in estimates, presentation,
and events rather than changes in accounting principles. For example, a change
in the estimated life of a depreciable asset will affect the comparability of the
statements. In that case, no explanatory paragraph for lack of consistency is
needed because the same method of depreciation is used in both years, but the
information may require disclosure in the statements.

3-13 The three conditions requiring a departure from an unqualified opinion are:

1. The scope of the audit has been restricted. One example is when
the client will not permit the auditor to confirm material receivables.
Another example is when the engagement is not agreed upon until
after the client's year-end when it may be impossible to physically
observe inventories.
2. The financial statements have not been prepared in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles. An example is when
the client insists upon using replacement costs for fixed assets.
3. The auditor is not independent. An example is when the auditor
owns stock in the client's business.

3-14 A qualified opinion states that there has been either a limitation on the
scope of the audit or a departure from GAAP in the financial statements, but that
the auditor believes that the overall financial statements are fairly presented. This
type of opinion may not be used if the auditor believes the exceptions being
reported upon are extremely material, in which case a disclaimer or adverse
opinion would be used.
An adverse opinion states that the auditor believes the overall financial
statements are so materially misstated or misleading that they do not present
fairly in accordance with GAAP the financial position, results of operations, or
cash flows.
3-5
3-14 (continued)

A disclaimer of opinion states that the auditor has been unable to satisfy
him or herself as to whether or not the overall financial statements are fairly
presented because of a significant limitation of the scope of the audit, or a non-
independent relationship under the Code of Professional Conduct between the
auditor and the client.
Examples of situations that are appropriate for each type of opinion are as
follows:

OPINION TYPE EXAMPLE SITUATION
Disclaimer Material physical inventories not
observed and the inventory cannot be
verified through other procedures.
Lack of independence by the auditor.
Adverse A highly material departure from GAAP.
Qualified Inability to confirm the existence of an
asset which is material but not extremely
material in value.

3-15 The common definition of materiality as it applies to accounting and,
therefore, to audit reporting is:

A misstatement in the financial statements can be considered material if
knowledge of the misstatement would affect a decision of a reasonable
user of the statements.

Conditions that affect the auditor's determination of materiality include:

Potential users of the financial statements
Dollar amounts of the following items: net income before taxes,
total assets, current assets, current liabilities, and owners' equity
Nature of the potential misstatementscertain misstatements, such
as fraud, are likely to be more important to users of the financial
statements than other misstatements.

3-16 Materiality for lack of independence in audit reporting is easiest to define.
If the auditor lacks independence as defined by the Code of Professional
Conduct, it is always considered highly material and therefore a disclaimer of
opinion is always necessary. That is, either the CPA is independent or not
independent. For failure to follow GAAP, there are three levels of materiality:
immaterial, material, and highly material.
3-6
3-17 The auditor's opinion may be qualified by scope limitations caused by
client restrictions or by limitations resulting from conditions beyond the client's
control. The former occurs when the client will not, for example, permit the
auditor to confirm material receivables or physically observe inventories. The
latter may occur when the engagement is not agreed upon until after the client's
year-end when it may not be possible to physically observe inventories or confirm
receivables.
A disclaimer of opinion is issued if the scope limitation is so material that
the auditor cannot determine if the overall financial statements are fairly
presented. If the scope limitation is caused by the client's restriction the auditor
should be aware that the reason for the restriction might be to deceive the
auditor. For this reason, a disclaimer is more likely for client restrictions than for
conditions beyond anyone's control.
When there is a scope restriction that results in the failure to verify
material, but not pervasive accounts, a qualified opinion may be issued. This is
more likely when the scope limitation is for conditions beyond the client's control
than for restrictions by the client.

3-18 A report with a scope and an opinion qualification is issued when the
auditor can neither perform procedures that he or she considers necessary nor
satisfy him or herself by using alternative procedures, usually due to the
existence of conditions beyond the client's or the auditor's control, but the
amount involved in the financial statements is not highly material. An important
part of a scope and opinion qualification is that it results from not accumulating
sufficient appropriate audit evidence, either because of the client's request or
because of circumstances beyond anyone's control.
A report qualified as to opinion only results when the auditor has
accumulated sufficient appropriate evidence but has concluded that the financial
statements are not correctly stated. The only circumstance in which an opinion
only qualification is appropriate is for material, but not highly material, departures
from GAAP.

3-19 The three alternative opinions that may be appropriate when the client's
financial statements are not in accordance with GAAP are an unqualified opinion,
qualified as to opinion only and adverse opinion. Determining which is
appropriate depends entirely upon materiality. An unqualified opinion is
appropriate if the GAAP departure is immaterial (standard unqualified) or if the
auditor agrees with the client's departure from GAAP (unqualified with
explanatory paragraph). A qualified opinion is appropriate when the deviation
from GAAP is material but not highly material; the adverse opinion is appropriate
when the deviation is highly material.

3-7
3-20 When the auditor discovers more than one condition that requires a
departure from or a modification of a standard unqualified report, the report should
be modified for each condition. An exception is when one condition neutralizes the
other condition. An example would be when the auditor is not independent and
there is also a scope limitation. In this situation the lack of independence
overshadows the scope limitation. Accordingly, the scope limitation should not be
mentioned.

3-21 The standard wording required by U.S. auditing standards has the
advantage of being consistent in how auditors communicate information about
the fair presentation of financial statements to users of financial statements.
Thus, any departures from the standard wording are more easily recognized.
Furthermore, some users may question whether the auditors conclusion about
the financial statements differ when using present fairly rather than when using
true and fair view. Proponents of the alternative choices offered by ISAs may
believe the choices allow the auditor to customize their report wording based on
the auditors preference of how to communicate to users. Others may also argue
for U.S. adoption of similar alternatives so that U.S. audit reports conf orm to
auditor reports based on ISAs. That consistency at a global level may help
reduce misunderstandings between auditors and users of financial statements.

3-22 Given the global nature of the financial markets, investors, both in the U.S.
and abroad, are frequently making investments in companies that are located all
over the world. While many companies located outside the U. S. already prepare
financial statements in accordance with International Financial Reporting
Standards (IFRS), financial statements of U.S.-based entities are based on U.S.
generally accepted accounting principles, differences in the basis of presentation
makes the analysis of U.S. and non-U.S.-based company financial statements
difficult. Similarly, differences exist in auditing standards issued across the globe,
so the adoption of International Statements on Auditing (ISAs) would mean
auditors from around the globe are conducting their audits using the same set of
standards. The embrace of IFRS and ISAs will help investors in their analysis of
audited financial statements prepared across the globe.


Multiple Choice Questions From CPA Examinations

3-23 a. (2) b. (3) c. (3)

3-24 a. (3) b. (4) c. (1)

3-25 a. (3) b. (2) c. (3)

3-8
Discussion Questions and Problems

3-26 a. "Correctly stated" implies absolute accuracy, whereas the alternative
report states that no material misstatements exist.
b. The reference to generally accepted accounting principles specifies
rules that were followed in accounting for the transactions to date;
whereas "the true economic conditions" does not identify the specific
accounting procedures applied.
c. The opinion paragraph is not intended to be a certification or a
guarantee of the accuracy and correctness of the financial statements,
but rather it is intended to be an expression of professional judgment
based upon a reasonable audit of the statements and underlying
records.
d. The name of the CPA firm rather than that of the individual practitioner
should appear on the accountant's report because it is the entire
firm that accepts responsibility for the report issued.
e. "Our audit was performed to detect material misstatements in the
financial statements" is flawed because the purpose of the audit is
to determine whether financial statements are fairly stated, not to
specifically search for material errors and fraud. It also fails to
recognize the audit standards followed by the auditor.
"We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards
generally accepted in the United States of America" identifies the
auditor's responsibilities for the conduct of the audit, accumulation
of evidence, and reporting requirements. It is a much broader
statement than the alternative clause. It also implies that if the
auditor has conducted the audit in accordance with generally
accepted auditing standards but does not uncover certain material
errors or fraud, the auditor is unlikely to have responsibility for
failing to do so.

3-27 a. Items that need not be included in the auditor's report are:

1. That Bellamy is presenting comparative financial statements.
(Both years' statements will be referred to in the audit report.)
2. Specific description of the change in method of accounting
for long-term construction contracts need not be included in
the report since it is discussed in the footnotes. But, the
auditor's report must state that there is a change in accounting
principles and refer to the footnote.
3. The fact that normal receivable confirmation procedures were
not used should not be disclosed since the auditor was able
to satisfy him or herself through alternative audit procedures.
4. The lawsuit need not be discussed in the report since it has
been included in a footnote.

3-9
3-27 (continued)

b. The following deficiencies are in Patel's report:

1. The audit report is neither addressed nor dated and it does
not contain a title. The audit report date should be the last
day of field work.
2. The balance sheet is as of a specific date, whereas the income
statement and the statement of retained earnings are for a
period of time. The scope paragraph should identify the period
of time (usually one year).
3. There are comparative statements, but the audit report
identifies and deals with only the current year's financial
statements. An opinion must also be included for the prior
period financial statements.
4. There is no separate introductory paragraph that states the
financial statements audited, dates, and the responsibilities
of management and the auditor.
5. There is no separate scope paragraph that describes what
an audit is. Two required sentences are completely omitted:
"An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting
principles used and significant estimates made by management,
as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation."
6. The audit was made in accordance with auditing standards
generally accepted in the United States of America rather
than generally accepted accounting standards.
7. The word material is excluded from the scope paragraph
(free of material misstatement).
8. An additional paragraph should be included which describes
the dividend restrictions and the refusal of the client to
present a statement of cash flows.
9. The opinion paragraph states that accounting principles were
consistent with those used in the prior year. The opinion
paragraph should make no reference to consistency.
10. The opinion paragraph excludes the required phrase, "in all
material respects."
11. The opinion paragraph includes the words "generally accepted
auditing standards" rather than the phrase "accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America."
12. A separate paragraph should be included stating that generally
accepted accounting principles were not consistently applied.
13. The opinion should be qualified rather than being unqualified.
Qualifications are caused by the:
(a) failure to present a statement of cash flows.
(b) failure to disclose the dividend restrictions.
3-10
3-28

(a)

CONDITION
(b)
MATERIALITY
LEVEL
(c)
TYPE OF
REPORT COMMENTS
1. Scope of
the audit
has been
restricted
Highly material Disclaimer Because the client refuses
to allow the auditor to
expand the scope of his
audit, a disclaimer of
opinion is appropriate
rather than a qualified as
to scope and opinion.
2. Lack of
independence
Not applicable Disclaimer Lack of independence by
audit personnel on the
engagement mandates
a disclaimer for lack of
independence.
3. None Not applicable Unqualified The company has made
a business decision to
follow a different financing
method for to have use of
delivery trucks, which is
adequately disclosed.
There is no change of
accounting principle.
4. Substantial
doubt about
going concern
Material Unqualified
explanatory
paragraph
Because the auditor has
substantial doubt about
the clients ability to
continue as a going
concern, the auditor
should include add an
explanatory paragraph to
the unqualified opinion.
5. None Material Unqualified While the auditor engaged
a business valuation
specialist to gather
evidence about the fair
value of the investment,
the auditor would issue an
unqualified opinion given
he or she was able to
conclude that the valuation
specialists work provides
sufficient appropriate
evidence.

3-11
3-28 (continued)

(a)

CONDITION
(b)
MATERIALITY
LEVEL
(c)
TYPE OF
REPORT COMMENTS
6. Failure to
follow GAAP
Highly material or
material. We need
additional
information
regarding the
auditor's
preliminary
judgment about
materiality
Adverse
(if highly
material)
or
Qualified
(if material)
The materiality of twenty
percent of net earnings
before taxes would be
sufficient for many
auditors to require an
adverse opinion. That
materiality question is a
matter of auditor
judgment.

3-29

(a)

CONDITION
(b)
MATERIALITY
LEVEL
(c)
TYPE OF
REPORT
(d) MODIFIED WORDING /
ADDITIONAL
PARAGRAPHS
(& OTHER COMMENTS)
1. None Not applicable (1) Unqualified
standard
wording
There is no indication
questioning the ability of the
business to continue
operations. The auditor does
not automatically add an
explanatory paragraph simply
because there is a risky
business.
2. None Immaterial (1) Unqualified
standard
wording
The amount is immaterial. The
facts are adequately disclosed
in the footnote.
3. Failure to
follow
GAAP
Material (4) Qualified
opinion only
except for
The standards require the use
of a qualified opinion for the
failure to include a statement
of cash flows. Third paragraph
must be added stating the
omission.
3-12
3-29 (continued)

(a)

CONDITION
(b)
MATERIALITY
LEVEL
(c)
TYPE OF
REPORT
(d) MODIFIED WORDING /
ADDITIONAL
PARAGRAPHS
(& OTHER COMMENTS)
4. None Not applicable (2) Unqualified
modified
wording
U.S. auditing standards now
allow an auditor to perform an
audit in accordance with both
U.S. GAAS and ISAs. The
auditors scope paragraph is
modified to indicate that audit
was conducted in accordance
with both standards.
5. Scope of
the audit
has been
restricted
Highly material (6) Disclaimer The client has restricted the
scope of the audit and the
auditor was not able to satisfy
him or herself by alternative
procedures. Because it was a
client restriction rather than a
condition beyond the clients
control causing the limitation,
and because the limitation is
highly material, a disclaimer is
appropriate. Introductory
paragraph is modified, second
paragraph is added describing
the scope restriction, scope
paragraph is omitted, and
opinion paragraph is a
disclaimer of opinion.
6. Report
involving
other
auditors
Material (3) Unqualified
modified
wording
This is a shared audit report in
which the auditor will identify
the portion of work done by
the other auditor in the
introductory paragraph and
still issue an unqualified
opinion. The absolute dollar
amounts of assets and
revenues or percentages must
be stated in the introductory
paragraph. Introductory
paragraph, scope paragraph,
and opinion paragraph are all
modified.

3-13
3-30

Type of
Opinion
Description
of Opinion
Comments
a. 7. A change in consistency requires the addition of an
explanatory paragraph that follows the opinion paragraph.
b. 4. When the amounts are so material that a disclaimer of
opinion is required, the auditor only uses three paragraphs.
The scope paragraph found in a standard unqualified report
is deleted to avoid stating anything that might lead readers to
believe other parts of the financial statements were audited.
The introductory and opinion paragraphs are modified and a
new middle paragraph is added describing the scope
limitation.
c. 8. The auditor would add a new third paragraph preceding the
opinion paragraph describing the GAAP departure resulting
from inadequate disclosure. Another explanatory paragraph
would follow the opinion paragraph describing the auditors
substantial doubt about going concern.
d. 3. When the auditor references the work of other auditors, all
three paragraphs are modified to reflect the involvement of
other auditors.
e. 2. The standard unqualified report contains three paragraphs
with no modifications.
f. 5. When a scope limitation is deemed to be material, but not
highly material, the auditors opinion is qualified to
acknowledge except for the scope limitation. Also, a new
third paragraph precedes the opinion paragraph to describe
the scope limitation.
g. 6. When the departure from accounting standards is deemed to
be highly material, the auditors opinion is modified to state
that the financial statements do not present fairly. A new
third paragraph precedes that opinion paragraph to describe
the departure from accounting principles.
h. 1. When the auditor is not independent, the auditors report is
limited to one paragraph that states that the auditor is not
independent.
i. 9. The change in consistency and the auditors decision to add
an emphasis of a matter paragraph both result in the
addition of separate explanatory paragraphs that follow the
opinion paragraph.
3-14
3-31

ITEM
NO. TYPE OF CHANGE
SHOULD
AUDITOR'S
REPORT BE
MODIFIED?
1
An error correction not involving an accounting
principle.
No
2
An accounting change involving both a change in
accounting principle and a change in accounting
estimate. Although the effect of the change in each
may be inseparable and the accounting for such a
change is the same as that for a change in estimate
only, an accounting principle is involved.
Yes
3
An accounting change involving a change from one
generally accepted accounting principle to another
generally accepted accounting principle.
Yes
4
An accounting change involving a change in an
accounting estimate.
No
5
Not an accounting change but rather a change in
classification.
No
6
An accounting change involving a correction of an
error in principle, which is accounted for as a
correction of an error.
Yes
7
An accounting change involving a change in the
reporting entity, which is a special type of change in
accounting principles.
Yes
8
An accounting change from one generally accepted
accounting principle to another generally accepted
accounting principle.
Yes

3-32 Deficiencies in the staff accountant's tentative report include the following:

1. Report title must include the word independent.
2. The report should generally be addressed to the board of directors
or stockholders, not to the audit committee.
3. The introductory paragraph should state, "we have audited," not
"we have examined."
3-15
3-32 (continued)

4. When the principal auditor decides to make reference to the audit
of another auditor, the report should i ndicate clearly in the
introductory paragraph the division of responsibility regarding the
portions of the financial statements audited by each. Also, the
opinion paragraph should state that the opinion is based in part on
the reports of other auditors. Neither of these was done.
5. When the principal auditor decides to make reference to the audit
of the other auditor, the report should disclose the dollar amounts
or percentages of the portion of the financial statements audited by
the other auditor. This was not done.
6. The second paragraph is an inappropriately worded scope paragraph.
It should be stated as follows:

We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing
standards generally accepted in the United States of
America. Those standards require that we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance
about whether the financial statements are free of
material misstatement. An audit includes examining,
on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts
and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit
also includes assessing the accounting principles
used and significant estimates made by management,
as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits and the
report of other auditors provide a reasonable basis for
our opinion.

7. Although the introductory paragraph referred to an audit of the
financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2011 and
2010, an opinion was expressed only on the 2011 financial statements.
8. The statement of cash flows was not identified in the opinion
paragraph, and financial statements were not referred to in the
opinion paragraph as "consolidated."
9. The explanatory sentence for consistency should follow the opinion
paragraph, not precede it. Also, the second sentence in the third
paragraph should be omitted.
10. There is no inclusion of the phrase, "in all material respects" in the
opinion paragraph.

3-16
3-33 The table presented below describes the seven distinct parts of the
standard unqualified report and describes both similarities (part a.) and
differences (part of b.) between the standard audit report and the audit report on
the Les Meridian, Inc. financial statements.

Seven Distinct Parts of
Standard Audit Report
a.
Description of
Similar Elements
in the Les Meridian
Auditors Report
b.
Different Elements
in Les Meridian
Auditors Report
1. Report title Auditing
standards require that
the report be titled and
that the title includes the
word independent.
The report is titled
Independent Auditors
Report.

2. Audit report address
The report is usually
addressed to the
company, its
stockholders, or the
board of directors.
The report is
addressed to the
Shareholders of Les
Meridian, Inc.

3. Introductory paragraph
The first paragraph of the
report does three things:
first, it makes the simple
statement that the CPA
firm has done an audit.
Second, it lists the
financial statements that
were audited, including
the statement of financial
position dates and the
accounting periods for
the statement of
comprehensive income
and statement of cash
flows. Third, it states that
the statements are the
responsibility of
management and that
the auditor's
responsibility is to
express an opinion on
the statements based on
an audit.
The report begins with
the statement that the
CPA firm has done an
audit.

The introductory para-
graph lists the financial
statements audited,
including the time period
of those statements.

The second paragraph
states that
management is
responsible for the
preparation and fair
presentation of the
financial statements.

The third paragraph
describes the auditors
responsibility to
express an opinion the
financial statements.
The introductory paragraph
also references the
summary of significant
accounting principles and
other explanatory reports
as being a part of the
scope of the audit. A
similar reference is not
included in the U.S.
standard audit report.

The discussion of manage-
ments responsibility for the
financial statements
contained in the second
paragraph is more
extensive than the
discussion in the standard
audit report. It specifically
notes that the financial
statements are prepared in
accordance with IFRS, and
it describes managements
responsibility for internal
control.
3-17
3-33 (continued)

Seven Distinct Parts of
Standard Audit Report
a.
Description of
Similar Elements
in the Les Meridian
Auditors Report
b.
Different Elements
in Les Meridian
Auditors Report
4. Scope paragraph. The
scope paragraph is a
factual statement about
what the auditor did in
the audit. The remainder
briefly describes
important aspects of an
audit.
The third paragraph
identifies the auditing
standards used to
conduct the audit,
similar to the standard
audit report.

Like the standard audit
report, the third
paragraph notes that
the auditor obtains
reasonable assurance
about whether the
financial statements
are free of material
misstatements.

The fourth paragraph
also contains
information related to
other elements in the
scope paragraph in the
standard audit report.
For example, the fourth
paragraph describes
the auditors evaluation
of accounting principles/
policies used, estimates
made, and the overall
presentation, similar to
the scope paragraph in
the standard audit report.

The fifth paragraph
acknowledges that the
auditor believes the
evidence obtained
provides a sufficient
basis for the opinion,
similar to the last
sentence of the scope
paragraph of the
standard audit report.
The third paragraph notes
that the auditor conducted
the audit in accordance
with ISAs, rather than
U.S. GAAS.


The third paragraph notes
that the auditor is required
to comply with ethical
requirements.






The fourth paragraph
contains more information
than the standard audit
report about the auditors
need to make judgments,
the auditors consideration
of risks and internal
control, and the fact that
the risk and control
assessments are not
sufficient to express an
opinion on internal
control. The fourth
paragraph also explicitly
notes that risks of
material misstatements
due to error or fraud are
considered.
3-18
3-33 (continued)

Seven Distinct Parts of
Standard Audit Report
a.
Description of
Similar Elements
in the Les Meridian
Auditors Report
b.
Different Elements
in Les Meridian
Auditors Report
5. Opinion paragraph. The
final paragraph in the
standard report states
the auditor's conclusions
based on the results of
the audit.
The last paragraph
includes the auditors
opinion about the
financial statements
and acknowledges the
accounting principles
used as the basis of
presentation.
The wording associated
with the opinion notes that
the auditors opinion is
about the true and fair
view of the financial
statements, rather than
the financial statements
present fairly as stated in
the standard audit report.
6. Name of CPA firm. The
name identifies the CPA
firm or practitioner who
performed the audit.
The name of the CPA
is included.

7. Audit report date. The
appropriate date for the
report is the end of
fieldwork, when the auditor
has gathered sufficient
appropriate evidence to
support the opinion.
The date that the audit
is completed is
provided below the
firms signature.



Internet Problem Solution: Research Annual Reports

Internet Problem 3-1

a. Form 8-K - This is the form that must be filed whenever a
registrant encounters a significant event (e.g., a change in
control of ownership, disposition or acquisition of a significant
amount of assets, filing for bankruptcy, change in independent
auditors).
Form 10-K - This is the annual report that most reporting
companies file with the Commission. It provides a comprehensive
overview of the registrant's business. The report must be
filed within 60-90 days after the end of the company's fiscal
year. This form is required by the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934.
3-19
Internet Problem 3-1 (continued)

Form 10-Q This is the quarterly report that includes the
quarterly financial statements filed with the SEC.
DEF-14a This filing includes the proxy statement sent to
shareholders. The proxy statement includes information about
the board of directors, including any requests for shareholder
vote on the election of certain directors, and it includes
information about executive compensation, auditor selection
and related audit and other fees, and other information about
board related activities and responsibilities.

b. 1. Ernst & Young LLP
2. Separate reports were issued on the financial statements
and on internal controls over financial reporting.
3. Unqualified opinion on the financial statements
4. Unqualified opinion on internal controls over financial reporting

c. 1. Unqualified opinions on both the financial statements and
internal control over financial reporting are included in a single
combined report.
3. The combined report issued by PricewaterhouseCoopers does
not follow the same standard wording format and paragraph
order of a standard unqualified report on the financial statements
or standard unqualified report on internal controls over
financial reporting. However, all the required elements of
both reports are present in the Yahoo auditors report. While
most audit firms use the standard unqualified report format as
presented in Chapter 3, auditing standards only require that
all required elements be included. Exact wording and
paragraph format are not mandated by auditing standards.
PricewaterhouseCoopers has chosen to present its standard
audit reports using a different format.


(Note: Internet problems address current issues using Internet sources. Because
Internet sites are subject to change, Internet problems and solutions may change. Current
information on Internet problems is available at www.pearsonhighered.com/arens).

Você também pode gostar