Doctrine: Under the Constitution, the HRET is the sole judge of all contests relating to the election, returns and qualifcations of House Members Thus, the C!ME"EC#s jurisdiction ends and the HRET#s begins onl$ after %inners become House Members, that is, after the$ ha&e '() been *roclaimed, '+) ta,en their oath of o-ce, and '.) assumed o-ce on /une .0 of the $ear follo%ing their election, %hen the$ start ser&ing their term Facts: Regina O. Reyes fled her candidacy as representative of the lone district of Marinduque for the 2013 elections. Her candidacy was questioned y !an" a voter and resident of the district. Her candidacy was questioned on the grounds that she lied aout her civil status" her irthday" her residence" and her citi#enship. !an rought the case to the $o%%ission on &lections. On March 2'" 2013" the $o%elec (irst )ivision cancelled Reyes* certifcate of candidacy +$O$, for representative of Marinduque. -y such cancellation" Reyes ceased to e a candidate. !he (irst )ivision held that y her %arriage to an .%erican" Reyes lost her natural/ orn (ilipino citi#enship and" thus" was not qualifed to e a law%a0er. $ontrary to her clai%" she did not regain her citi#enship ecause she failed to +1, to ta0e an oath of allegiance to the 1hilippines" and +2, to renounce her .%erican citi#enship" as required y 1hilippine law. On May 12" the $OM&3&$ en anc" voting 4/1" a5r%ed the (irst )ivision*s ruling. !he a5r%ation eca%e fnal and e6ecutory on May 17. )espite such cancellation" Reyes" whose na%e was printed on the auto%ated allot" gathered the highest nu%er of votes" with 3ord .llan 8elasco placing second. On May 19" the -O$ proclai%ed her the winner. On :une ;" she too0 her oath of o5ce. Reyes sued the $OM&3&$ in the <upre%e $ourt" accusing the poll ody of e6ceeding its =urisdiction in cancelling her $O$. <he also argued that after she was proclai%ed winner" the $OM&3&$ lost its =urisdiction over her. On :une 2;" the $ourt" voting '/2" issued its questioned resolution" penned y :ustice :ose 1ortugal 1ere#" upholding the $OM&3&$. Reyes then fled a Motion for Reconsideration. Issue/s: 1. >hether or not petitioner is ineligile to run for o5ce 2. >hether or not $OM&3&$ is without =urisdiction over 1etitioner who is a duly proclai%ed winner and who has already ta0en her oath of o5ce for the position of Me%er of the House of Representatives e!"/Rat#$: 1. 1etitioner is ineligile ?n %oving for the cancellation of petitioner@s $O$" respondent su%itted records of the -ureau of ?%%igration showing that petitioner is a holder of a A< passport" and that her status is that of a ali0ayan. .t this point" the urden of proof shifted to petitioner" i%posing upon her the duty to prove that she is a natural/orn (ilipino citi#en and has not lost the sa%e" or that she has re/acquired such status in accordance with the provisions of R... Bo. 722;. .side fro% the are allegation that she is a natural/orn citi#en" however" petitioner su%itted no proof to support such contention. Beither did she su%it any proof as to the inapplicaility of R... Bo. 722; to her. 2. $OM&3&$ has =urisdiction Ander the $onstitution" the HR&! is the sole =udge of all contests relating to the election" returns and qualifcations of House Me%ers. !hus" the $OM&3&$*s =urisdiction ends and the HR&!*s egins only after winners eco%e House Me%ers" that is" after they have +1, een proclai%ed" +2, ta0en their oath of o5ce" and +3, assu%ed o5ce on :une 30 of the year following their election" when they start serving their ter%. $onsequently" the $OM&3&$ still had =urisdiction to rule on Reyes* qualifcations when the co%%ission issued its decision on May 12" which eca%e fnal on May 17. )igested yC .&ROB -. H.3O<