This document summarizes information about ADHD and the MOXO clinical and research tools. It describes ADHD as a common childhood neurobehavioral disorder characterized by inattention, impulsivity and hyperactivity. Twin and family studies suggest it has a strong genetic component. The MOXO test is an online computerized continuous performance test that objectively assesses attentional profiles in patients aged 7 and older. It incorporates environmental distractors to improve sensitivity over legacy CPT tests. The test provides results immediately and clinical decision support to help diagnose and treat ADHD.
This document summarizes information about ADHD and the MOXO clinical and research tools. It describes ADHD as a common childhood neurobehavioral disorder characterized by inattention, impulsivity and hyperactivity. Twin and family studies suggest it has a strong genetic component. The MOXO test is an online computerized continuous performance test that objectively assesses attentional profiles in patients aged 7 and older. It incorporates environmental distractors to improve sensitivity over legacy CPT tests. The test provides results immediately and clinical decision support to help diagnose and treat ADHD.
This document summarizes information about ADHD and the MOXO clinical and research tools. It describes ADHD as a common childhood neurobehavioral disorder characterized by inattention, impulsivity and hyperactivity. Twin and family studies suggest it has a strong genetic component. The MOXO test is an online computerized continuous performance test that objectively assesses attentional profiles in patients aged 7 and older. It incorporates environmental distractors to improve sensitivity over legacy CPT tests. The test provides results immediately and clinical decision support to help diagnose and treat ADHD.
Eran Sandel Head of Professional Training Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) ADHD is the most common childhood neuro- behavioural disorder defined by symptoms of developmentally inappropriate inattention, impulsivity and hyperactivity (Polanczyk 2007). Up to 60% of children with ADHD will continue to have significant ADHD-related symptoms persisting into adulthood (Gentile et al. 2006). Twin, family and adoption studies have suggested that there is a strong genetic contribution to ADHD, with a mean heritability estimate of 76% (Faraone 2005) . Control vs. ADHD - fMRI 2-3 years of delay in cortical maturation between ADHD and healthy controls. First developed in the early 60s. Computerized, objective measurement tool. Basic go/no-go task. Serves as an objective decision support tool in the ADHD diagnosis procedure. CPTs Continuous Performance Test T.O.V.A Test (Developed in 1966) Go - No Go Test Advantages: Popular & traditional market. Allows Test-Retest evaluation. Disadvantages: Visual channel only. OFFLINE system. Peripheral vision. Norms from the 80's (North American). T.O.V.A Test Results d-CPT Test Next-generation CPT. Objective tool to evaluate attentive profile in patients Age 7 and above. Innovative distractor approach challenges attentional and executive systems to improve sensitivity and specificity over legacy CPTs. MOXO Test moment of clarity(Japanese) Sensitivity and Specificity by ADHD subtypes (N=178) (N=369) N=547 ADHD (178) Control (369) Validation Study Source: Neurotech Solutions data on file Clinical Value Decision Support Beyond CPT Operations Web-based, low overhead. No specialized equipment. Test Design Stimuli No language confounds. Ecologically valid (real-world content). Distractors Visual, auditory and combined. Challenges attentional systems beyond classical CPT. HIPAA compliant Results Obtained immediately once the test ended. Statistical differentiation from norm population. Patient performance across the different levels of the test. Moxo Clinical Adoption Israel (2012-): National HMOs offer coverage. 400 clinics certified. 7 Major Hospitals. 28 Regional Psychological Service Centers (Ministry of Education). >60,000 tests performed. Pediatric Test Age 7-12 15 min Tests elements appear always at the center Target Element Non Target Element Distractors Visual / Audio / Combination appear always at the periphery Practice Adult Test Age 13-60 18.5 min Target Element Non Target Element Tests elements appear always at the center Distractors Visual / Audio / Combination appear always at the periphery Combined distractors Test Simulation The Four Attentiveness Indices Attention (A) The ability to respond correctly and remain focused. Timing (T) The ability to respond quickly and accurately. Example for a perfect timing Example for a less perfect timing The Four Attentiveness Indices Impulsiveness (I) The tendency to respond hastily, before evaluating the situation. Hyperactivity (H) A difficulty in regulation of motor responses. Lets play a short game Target Void Non -Target Void time Every element (Target/Non-Target) is followed by a Void. The Void period is equal to the Target/Non-Target period. The Moxo Test Pattern 4s 8s Target Void Non -Target Void A T I H The Four Attentiveness Indices Calculation Test Results Patient Profile Comparison of individual performance to norm group. Norm criteria: age and gender. Z score: Calculated for each index and categorized by performance level. Performance Graph Maps performance throughout the test Continuous Performance. Distractor effects. Patient Profile Comparison Table Severity Table Legends Comparison table ( Z > 0 ) ( < Z 0 0.825 - ) ( 0.825 - < Z 1.65 - ) ( 1.65 - Z < ) ( 2.55 - Z ) ( 2.25 - < Z 2.55 - ) ( 1.95 - < Z 2.25 - ) ( 1.65 - < Z 1.95 - ) Severity table Performance Graph Performance Graph 1. Comparison (level 8 to level 1) 3. Fluctuation 2. Distracters 4. Correlation Principles of MOXO Analysis Performance Graph Continuous performance 1 Performance in the Attention index decreases overtime (less attentive) Performance Graph Continuous performance 2 Performance in the Hyperactivity index decreases across time (more hyperactive) Performance Graph Continuous performance 3 Performance in the Impulsiveness index increases across time (less impulsivity) Performance Graph Distractors effect 1 Visual distractors lower attention Performance Graph Distractors effect 2 Auditory distractors improve Attention and Timing Performance Graph Distractors effect Major distractors improves Impulsiveness 3 Performance Graph Correlation Between Indices Trade off Timing vs. Impulsiveness 1 Performance Graph Correlation Between Indices Trade off Timing vs. Impulsiveness 2 Performance Graph Correlation Between Indices Trade off Attention vs. Hyperactivity 3 Treatment evaluation Before-after Ritalin 10mg Unmedicated Ritalin IR 10 mg Medication improves performance 1 Treatment evaluation Before-after Ritalin 10mg Unmedicated Ritalin LA 20 mg Medication impairs performance 2 MOXO Clinical Decision Support Unmedicated Patient code: 407609 | Male | 22Y | Test Date: February 2014 Symptoms: Attention and Anxiety Medication Selection I Clinical Interpretation: No significant drug effect Provider moved to address anxiety symptoms Ritalin LA 30 mg SSRI only SSRI + Ritalin LA 30 mg Symptoms not anxiety- or depression-driven C l i n i c i a n
I n t e r p r e t a t i o n Alternative MPH formulation with SSRI shows additional effect Patient code: 407609 | Male | 22Y | Test Date: April 2014 Symptoms: Attention and Anxiety Medication Selection II Unmedicated Male, 11Y Previous Clinician Assessment: ODD Parental Assessment: ADHD Clinical Decision Support Objectively deconflict contradictory assessments Methylphenidate Moxo provided clinician with demonstrable evidence to bolster assessment. After viewing report, parents agreed to ODD-focused treatment approach Before Therapy Female | 14Y | Symptoms: Depression with attention problems Efficacy of Psychotherapy Treatment After Therapy Teacher Parents Hyperactive / Impulsive Attention Hyperactive / Impulsive Attention 7/9 8/9 1/9 2/9 ADHD questionnaire for parents and teachers Recent Peer-Reviewed Publications Haimov-Kochman R et al. Cognitive functions of regularly cycling women may differ throughout the month, depending on sex hormone status; a possible explanation to conflicting results of studies of ADHD in females. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 8(191): 1-6 (2014). Berger I. and Cassuto H. The effect of environmental distractors incorporation into a CPT on sustained attention and ADHD diagnosis among adolescents. Journal of Neuroscience Methods 222:62-68 (2014). Cassuto H, et al. Using environmental distractors in the diagnosis of ADHD. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 7 (805): 1-10 (2014). Berger I, et al. Maturational delay in ADHD: Evidence from CPT. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 7 (691): 1-11 (2013). Berger I and Goldzweig G. Objective Measures of Attention Deficit / Hyperactivity Disorder: A Pilot Study. Israel Medical Association Journal 12:531-535 (2010). Institution Project March 2014 Status Hadassah/ Hebrew University Attentional loading in autism, measured vs. siblings and on/off medications Recruiting Hadassah/ Hebrew University Estrogen effect on attention in post-menopausal women Mini-review published, poster presented, recruitment ongoing Nat Inst for Testing and Eval Multi-battery assessment of university students with attention deficits Analysis Hadassah/ Hebrew University Ritalin effect on ADHD using Moxo Poster presented Analysis ongoing Schneider Childrens Hospital Attention deficits in epilepsy Poster presented, Analysis ongoing Wolfson Hospital Attention in ADHD and mental retardation Manuscript in prep Hadassah/ Hebrew University Fatigue effect on attention in medical residents Manuscript in prep Selected Studies ICASA Neurotech Solutions is a founding member and partner of ICASA www.adhdandsubstanceabuse.org ICASA Goals Prevention of development of SUD in ADHD children, adolescents and adults. Increasing the quality of diagnostic and treatment procedures in adolescents and adults suffering from both disorders. USA, Netherland , Australia, Norway, Sweden, Belgium, France, Spain, Switzerland, Hungary, Finland, England, Ireland, South Africa, Brazil, Egypt Participating countries 45 Number of researchers ICASA Members Research Consortium Collaboration CASP Study Multi-center study US, Australia, Hungary, Netherlands, Israel Initiated 2012 Research Population (n~450): Adults with Substance Use Disorder (SUD) Adults with SUD and ADHD Healthy Controls Goal: Investigate attention, hyperactivity, response time and impulsivity in SUD, ADHD & comorbid disorders Status: Manuscripts in preparation CASP Study Consortium ICASA Neurotech Solutions is a founding member and partner of ICASA www.adhdandsubstanceabuse.org Participating Countries: USA, Netherlands, Australia, Norway, Sweden, Belgium, France, Spain, Switzerland, Hungary, Finland, England, Ireland, South Africa, Brazil, Egypt Developmental Report For Pediatric test (7-12) Developmental Research Developmental Research Patients Details Summary Table Age Resemblance (z score) Comparative Report For patients with 2-4 tests Getting started Important technical issues Use wired internet connection only (not cellular or WIFI). Recommended browser Google Chrome. Use a keyboard thats wired connected to the computer. Use external speakers (not screen built in speakers). Turn off any irrelevant software running in the background (Skype, outlook, etc.). Make sure all pop-up elements are neutralized. After test begins- do not touch the mouse. If using a laptop (not recommended). Use wire internet connection. Connect external wired keyboard and mouse. Summary: MOXO d-CPT Test General Objective measures for key attention parameters. Low overhead, easy deployability. Flexible business model. International partnering opportunities. Clinical Decision Support Beyond CPT. Significant unmet need . Rapid adoption in the field. Decision support for challenging diagnoses. DSM-V adult criteria have added additional uncertainty. Multiple reports, including developmental age and longitudinal tracking. Research Flexible, Adaptable Collaborative. Standardization across sites. Flexible structure can support multiple control/norm groups. Thank you!