Explain in detail the object, purpose and basis of international
law. 2001 Define International Law. Do you agree with John Austins concept International Law is not a true law, but a positi!e international "orality#$ Elaborate your answer with appropriate argu"ents.2005 %hat are the sources of International Law$ Discuss any two of the" in detail.2005 International Law is a Law regulating the rights and duties of states and creating no rights and i"posing no duties on indi!iduals#. Do u agree with this state"ent$ %hy or why not$ Argue.2006 John Austin says International Law is not a real Law, but a positi!e International &orality.# Do you agree with hi"$ 'i!e argu"ents in support of your answer.2008 'i!e such a definition of International Law which could co!er all the "odern trends in it$ 2010 (International Law is pri"arily concerned with the rights, duties and interests of states.( Exa"ine this state"ent with reference to the place of indi!iduals and non)state entities is International Law. 2011 SUBJECT OF INTERNATIONAL LAW %hat does *ubjects of international law "ean$ Discuss indi!iduals as subjects of International Law. Elaborate your answer with the appropriate exa"ples.2005 +riefly and precisely define *,+JE-.* International Law. Do you agree that I/DI0ID,AL* can be considered as subjects of International Law$ 'i!e appropriate exa"ples in this regard.2008 %hat is "eant by 1*ubjects of International Law1$ Justify Indi!iduals as the subject of International Law by gi!ing appropriate exa"ples. 2010 NATIONALITY Short Notes: /ationality 2000 Define nationality. %hat are neutral and neutrali2ed states$ 2001 Explain the !arious "odes of ac3uiring and losing nationality. %hat is double /ationality and *tatelessness$ 2002 Short Notes: Double nationality 2003, 2012 Explain the !arious "odes of ac3uiring and losing /A.I4/ALI.5. %hat is D4,+LE /A.I4/ALI.5 and *.A.ELE**/E**$ 2007 RECOGNITION OF STATES %hat do you understand by 16ecognition of *tates1 and 16ecognition of 'o!ern"ents$ Explain fully the distinction between 76ecognition Dejure and 76ecognition Defacto. 2000 Short Notes: De facto recognition 2003 Describe the legal nature of recognition of states, with particular reference to difference between defacto and Dejure recognition. 2003 %hat is the duty of other states in case of internal re!olt in an independent state$ -an they help the rebels$ ,nder what circu"stances recognition "ay be accorded to the rebels$ 2006 (%hat is "eant by 6E-4'/I.I4/ of *.A.E* as a "a"ber of 8A&IL5 of /A.I4/*$ *tate the different "odes of such recognition. 2007 Discuss 6ecognition. Differentiate between de)jure and de)facto recognition. %hat are the disabilities of an unrecogni2ed state$ 2008 Define 6ecognition. Differentiate between Defacto and Dejure 6ecognition. 2010 (.he *ubject of 6ecognition is one of the "ost difficult branches of international law, not "erely fro" the points of !iew of exposition of principles, but also intrinsically by reason of "any difficulties which arise in practice.( Discuss 2011 /on)recognition of a go!ern"ent can be a"ounted to denying the recognition of the state itself as it is the go!ern"ents that do international business on behalf of the states.# Argue in affir"ati!e this state"ent with particular reference to -onstituti!e .heory of 6ecognition. 2012 INTERNATIONAL RIVERS %rite a co"prehensi!e note on international ri!ers and international canal. 2001 Describe international ri!ers. *tate the principles of law, regulating the use of water and na!igation in international ri!ers. 2003 HIGH SEAS Short Notes: 9igh *eas 2000 Discuss the extent to which a state can clai" jurisdiction o!er the high seas in war and peace. Is an appropriation by a state of the underwater soil allowed in International Law$2006 Define 9igh *eas. Explain the concept of 8reedo" of 9igh *eas along)with restrictions o!er it.2008 INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE %rite a detailed note on the International)court of Justice with particular reference to its powers to exercise jurisdiction o!er disputant states. 2000 .he jurisdiction of international court of justice depends on the consent of the parties concerned. Discuss. 2001 9ow far has the ,nited /ation succeeded in de!eloping a co"prehensi!e syste" of 9u"an 6ights protection$ -an e"phasis on social justice and 9u"an rights lead to a stable International 4rder$ 2009 UNITED NATIONS ORGANIZATION -ritically exa"ine the powers and the !oting procedure of the ,./. *ecurity -ouncil . 2000 9ow far has the ,nited /ation succeeded in de!eloping a co"prehensi!e syste" of 9u"an 6ights protection$ -an e"phasis on social justice and 9u"an rights lead to a stable International 4rder$2009 :eeping in !iew the objecti!es of the charter see:ing to establish a "echanis" of peace and security how far has ,nited /ations succeeded in confronting changes in 'lobal society$ 2009 (.he ;ractice of ,nited /ations 4rgani2ation *how that while the principle of *elf)Deter"ination is agreed upon, neither the scope of its application nor the "ethod of decoloni2ation has been settled.( Discuss 2011 (All the "ajor issues on !oting in the *ecretary -ouncil are now satisfactorily resol!ed. .he real proble" today is about the co"position of the *ecurity -ouncil.( Discuss 2011 Elucidate and justify< (.he ,nited /ations inspite of its i"perfections, is the only organi2ations that can sa!e hu"anity fro" disaster and co"plete annihilation.( 2011 Does the custo"ary international law grant the right to use force to a state in response to a terrorist attac: on it$ *ubstantiate your answer by arguing fro" Article => and ;aragraph ? of the Article @ of the ,/ -harter and other recent exa"ples in this regard. 2012 NEUTRALIZATION Short Notes: /eutrality 2003 Differentiate between /eutrali2ed and /eutral *tates. Discuss the rights and duties of a neutral state.2005 Discuss the concept of /eutrali2ation. 9ow is it done$ Explain the 6ights, Duties and 'uarantees gi!en to a /eutrali2ed state.2010 INTERNATIONAL DISPUTES Discuss Aash"ir dispute in the light of 1. 6ight of self deter"ination 2001 2. ,/ *ecurity -ouncil resolution 2001 3. /on interference in internal affairs 2001 4. legal status of election in Aash"ir 2001 5. *i"la agree"ent 2001 %hat are a"icable "eans of settle"ent of international disputes$ 2002 Describe !arious "ethods of peaceful and a"icable settle"ent of international disputes. 2004 Discuss a"icable "eans for the settle"ent of international disputes.2005 Discuss A"icable &eans for the settle"ent of International Disputes.$2008 Discuss in detail a"icable "eans for settle"ent of international disputes.2010 DIPLOMACY *tate the !arious :inds and classes of diplo"atic agents and "ention their pri!ileges and i""unities.2003 A ;a:istani citi2en wor:ing in the e"bassy of a foreign country in Isla"abad, has co""itted an offence against another ;a:istani citi2en. .he ;a:istani police want to arrest such person. 9owe!er, the a"bassador is refusing to hando!er the accused to the police with the plea that the accused has a diplo"atic i""unity. Do you agree with the pleas of the a"bassador$ %hy or why not$2006 Describe I"portance of diplo"acy in interstate relations and discuss the concept of diplo"acy and i""unity$2009 Define Diplo"atic En!oy. 'i!e a short account of the functions, pri!ileges and i""unities of the diplo"atic en!oys accredited to other states. 2011 IMMUNITY *tate i""unity has beco"e a "ere fiction which the law can do with out. .he principle is gradually withering away, a process already under way and constantly gaining "o"entu". Do you agree$ 'i!e reasons in support of your answer.2002 Describe I"portance of diplo"acy in interstate relations and discuss the concept of diplo"acy and i""unity$2009 COURTS AND CASES Short Notes: -orfu -hannel -ase, ,.A.0. AlbaniaB>C?DE, I.-.J. 6ep. >C?C. 2000 Short Notes: -hor2ow 8actory case, 'er"any 0. ;oland B>C@DE , ;.-.I.J. 6ep. *er. A, /o.>F 2000 Explain the rules which go!ern the application of International Law by &unicipal -ourts. 'i!e your answer in the light of the court practice with special reference to the +ritish and A"erican -ourts. 2000 Short Notes: ;ri2e courts 2002, 2012 Ena"urate the principles of International Law in!ol!ed in the decision of -orfu -hannel -ase. Assess the i"pact that decision on the growth and de!elop"ent of International Law.2004 Short Notes: *cotia -ase 2005 Describe the functions of a ;ri2e -ourt. %hat law does it ad"inister$2006 TREATY Define a 7.reaty. *tate how are they concluded and ter"inated$ Explain it in the light of 0ienna -on!ention on the Law of .reaties >CGC. 2000 -oercion against a state renders a treaty in!alid. Discuss "ain features of the principle. Also elaborate two other "ethods of rendering in!alid the consent of a state to be bound by a treaty.2002 *tate and discuss in brief the !arious steps "entioned by star:e in the creation of legal obligation by a treaty. 2003 9ow far do you thin: that International Law is based on co""on consent of *tates$ E!aluate i"portance of custo"ary law and treaty law as binding in this regard 2009 %hat are the !arious :inds of treaties in international law$ Explain the laws about for"ation, interpretation and ter"ination of treaties. 2012 EXTRADITION Short Notes: Extradition 2003, 2012 Discuss the concept of extradition. Explain "ain principles of extradition. Discuss also the cri"es exe"pted fro" extradition.2005 'i!e precise definition of Extradition. %rite a co"prehensi!e essay on extradition by co!ering all its aspects.2008 STATE JURISDICTION Discuss the ter" *tate jurisdiction with reference to 1. &ariti"e belt 2. ;ort 3. 8oreigners 4. 8loating island 2003 Define *tate jurisdiction and explain how do"estic jurisdiction can be li"ited by and reduced by principles of International Law$ 2009 INTERVENTIONS Short Notes: Inter!ention 2000 .he fre3uent 7Inter!entions ha!e challenged the !alidity of so"e of funda"ental principles of International Law. %hat are those principles$ Discuss in the light of inter!entions in Afghanistan and Ira3 by the super)powers.2004 %hate!er the "orality of inter!ention, states ha!e no right under International Law to inter!ene on the territory of other states in order to pre!ent alleged cri"es against hu"anity or to uphold hu"an rights nor"s.# Discuss. 2006 Explain with reference to the rele!ant articles of the ,/ -harter that whether the world body is authori2ed to inter!ene in the do"estic jurisdiction of its "e"ber states. 2012 VETO %hat is !eto$ 9ow, when and by who" is used$ 2003 %hat is 0eto$ 9ow, when and by who" it is used$ %hat conse3uences ;a:istan had to face in the past because of its use by a for"er superpower$ 2012 SOVEREIGN STATE 8ully explain the duties of a *o!ereign *tate with special reference to<2004 >. /ot to interfere in the do"estic affairs of another state @. .o refrain fro" use of threat of use force against another state Discuss !arious "odes of Ac3uisition of .erritorial *o!ereignty by the states ac:nowledged in International Law. 2010 Lord -ur2on once said, 8rontiers are indeed the ra2ors edge on which hang suspended the "odern issues of war or peace, of life or death to nations.# Explain in this light the !arious "odes of ac3uisition of territory by a state. 2012 HIJACKING Short Notes: 9igh jac:ing 2000 Explain how the proble" of 9ijac:ing has been dealt with under the International Law$2004 BLOCKADE Short Notes: +loc:ade 2000 Define +loc:ade. %hat are the essentials of real and binding +loc:ade$ %hat does it ter"inate$ 6efer to leading cases 2004 PRISONERS OF WAR 9ow are 7;risoners of war to be treated under International Law$ Explain with reference to !arious con!entions. 2004 Short Notes: 6ights of ;risoners of %ar 2005 LAW OF SEA %rite short notes on any three of the following in the light of con!ention on the law of sea >CD@ and our "ariti"e 2one act of >CFG. 5ou "ust discuss the nature of jurisdiction, right and duties. 1. Internal %aters 2. -ontinental *helf 3. .erritorial %aters 4. Land)loc:ed *tate 5. EEH 2001 Short Notes: .erritorial waters 2002 Short Notes: -ontinental *helf 2005, 2012 MISCELLANEOUS Enu"erates with short explanation the "ain principles discussed in any two of the following cases. 1. Lotus case 2001 2. -larence .ho"as and Anita hill case 2001 3. A"erican diplo"at case 2001 %hat do you understand by international institutions$ Discuss their status and functions as subject of international law. 2002 Discuss the liability of the following< 2006 >. .he a"bassador of the 6epublic of +rondasia in Isla"abad "urders a ;a:istani out of sudden pro!ocation. @. .he wife of the +rondasian a"bassador bought cos"etics worth 6s.>III,III fro" a local depart"ental store, refused to pay and went away to her e"bassy. J. A ;a:istani friend of the +rondasian a"bassador has "urdered a +rondasian e"ployee of the e"bassy. %hat is the duty of other states in case of internal re!olt in an independent state$ -an they help the rebels$ ,nder what circu"stances recognition "ay be accorded to the rebels$2006 Differentiate between .erritorial and Extra).erritorial Asylu". ,nder which circu"stances an E"bassy or -onsulate can offer asylu" to a fugiti!eKoffender of the territorial *tate$2008 Define International personality and discuss !arious entities as International Legal person.2009 .erritory is undoubtedly the basic character of a state as well as widely accepted elaborate with reference to exclusi!e rights of states on Land and Air territory.2009 'i!e an account of the efforts of international co""unity to protect the ci!ilian population fro" the effects of war.2010 (As the basis of the Law of /ations is the co""on consent of the "e"ber states of the 8a"ily of /ations, it is e!ident there "ust exist as "any sources of international law as there are facts through which such co""on consent can possibly co"e into existence.( B4ppenhei"E. Discuss 2011 SHORT NOTES Short Notes: 9u"an 6ights 2000 Short Notes: Exclusi!e Econo"ic Hone 2000 Short Notes: -al!o -lause 2000 Short Notes: Aellogg +riand ;act >C@D 2002 Short Notes: .he 'ene!a -on!ention >C@C 2002 Short Notes: ;acta *unt *er!anda 2002 Short Notes: ;rotectorate 2002, 2012 Short Notes: *tate ser!itude 2002 Short Notes: &onroes doctrine 2002 Short Notes: E3uality of states 2002 Short Notes: Doctrine of ;ostli"iniu" 2002 Short Notes: -ontinuous !oyage 2002 Short Notes: International boundaries 2003 Short Notes: ,ni!ersal Declaration of 9u"an 6ights 2012