1

OUTLINE IN PERSONS
AND FAMILY RELATIONS
SY 2014-2015
-------------------
Note: All articles reere!ces are to t"e Fa#il$ %o&e '!less a %i(il
%o&e article reere!ce ) N%% * is i!&icate&+

Re,'ire& Te-t: Fa#il$ La. i! t"e P"ili//i!es0 Le1ar&a0 Ma.is0 2ar1as
)2013*

We will use a variety of teaching/learning methods to achieve the goals of
this course, to keep things interesting, and to accommodate various learning
styles. I ask for your forbearance when I am using a style that works for
others, but not for you.

The methods include:
A. Teacher and student presentation
B. Whole class, small group and team discussion and problem solving
. !ractice e"ams and #ui$$es
%. &ther

'. (&)*+
A. Teacher
,. Work hard to help students succeed in the course
-. +hare knowledge
.. /odel skills and values
0. !rovide feedback to students
1. )ead in course and class design
2. )ead in maintaining a positive, challenging learning environment
3. !rovide feedback to students
4. 5rade student performance
6. &ther

B. +tudents
,. Work hard to achieve the goals of the course
-. Assist in course and class design
.. Actively contribute to maintaining a positive, respectful, challenging
learning environment
0. +hare knowledge
1. !rovide feedback to teacher and other students
2
2. ooperate and collaborate with other students working in teams
3. &ther

!(&7*++I&8A) *85A5*/*8T I8 )AW +9&&)
As you may know, you are creating your professional reputation in the law.
Accordingly, please behave as the best attorneys do. This includes paying
attention and responding to what others say as well as working with others to
collectively learn the material.

!lease be prepared for class and to be ready to work. !lease listen to others,
avoid dominating discussion, take the initiative to improve your skills, take
risks and be resourceful. !lease seek help when you reali$e you need it or
when recommended. !lease show up every day on time and stay in class the
whole time.

If you are unable to attend a class due to illness or other good reason, please
notify me before class, if at all possible. :ou may receive an e"cused
absence if you notify me in writing why you need to miss class and provide
me with sufficient information for me to e"cuse you. If you accumulate 1 or
more une"cused absences, you will fail the course and you will be given a
;1< in the class.

:ou are responsible for learning information and getting the handouts
provided in class or made available online. If you missed class, talk to
classmates to learn what happened and get notes.

When you are in class, please be prepared to participate in the discussion=
and to engage. Being ;prepared< does not mean you have become an e"pert
on the material> it does mean that you will have read ?generally more than
once for court opinions@ and thought about the assigned materials, completed
assigned work, and be ready to engage and discuss this work with others.
:ou will not be penali$ed for asking what you might think are ;stupid
#uestions< or letting me know when you are confused. :ou are responsible,
however, for asking #uestions when you do not understand material.

In class, you are each responsible for participating to an appropriate e"tent,
i.e., neither being silent nor dominating the discussion, but doing your share
of the talking.

3
If you cannot prepare for a class, please notify me that you are unprepared at
the beginning of class. Being unprepared counts as an une"cused absence. If
you are not prepared for some classes, I may ask you to leave. This would be
because we will be discussing material specific to a graded assignment, and
it is only appropriate to have the discussion with students who have already
completed the assignment.

8ote: + (ules re#uired:
,. A-B2BA-, Adoption
-. A-B,,B,A, 8ullity
., A-B,,B,,, )egal +eparation
0. A-B,,B,-, !rovisional &rders
1. A.BA0BA0, ustody of /inors
2. A0B,AB,,, 'AW


I. I8T(&%CTI&8

, Tolentino, ivil ode, pp. ,B,A D,66A *ditionE


II. *77*T A8% A!!)IATI&8 &7 )AW+

Arts. , to ,., pp. ,B1- of Tolentino
8 , B ,4

A. When law takes effect

8 -
(evised Administrative ode ?(A@ +ecs. ,4B-0
*"ec. &rder -AA, +ec. -

TaFada v. Tuvera ,.2 +(A -3
Acaac v Azcuna, Jr., G.R. No. 187378, SEP 30, 2013


B. Ignorance of the law

8 .
GA+I)A5 '+. (&%(I5C*H, 26 !9I) -,3
4
. (etroactivity of laws

8 0, cf. 8 --1- B --26
(evised !enal ode ?(!@ --
7amily ode ?7@ -12

+imon v han, 5.(. 8o. ,13103, 7ebruary -., -A,,
7rancisco vs. A , 5.(. 8o. ,A-..A. 8ovember -1, ,664
7: !esca vs. !esca, 5.(. 8o. ,.26-,. April ,3, -AA,


%. /andatory or !rohibitory )aws

8 Art. 1 with 8 Art. ,3 ?.@
8erwin v !8&, 5.(. 8o. ,23A13, April ,,, -A,-


*. Waiver of rights

8 Art. 2
8 Art. -A.1

%/ onsunIi vs. A, 5.(. 8o. ,.343., April -A, -AA,
'illareal v !eople, 5.(.8o.,1,-14, 7ebruary,, -A,-


7. (epeal of laws

8 3
cf. ,643 onstitution, Art. J'III +ec. .
7 -10, -11

Thornton vs. Thornton, Aug. ,2, -AA0


4+ Kudicial %ecisions

8 4

!esca vs. !esca, 5.(. 8o. ,.26-,. April ,3, -AA,
5
%e astro v KB, 5. (. 8o. ,6,AA-, April -A, -A,A
Republc v Ren!an Enterpr"e", GR 1##310, $eb.1#, 201%


9. %uty to render Iudgment

8 6, ,A
(! 1
!eople v. (itter ,60 +(A 26A
Alon$o v !adua, ,1A +(A .36


I. !resumption and Applicability of ustom

8 ,, B ,-
cf. ,643 onstitution, Art. JII +ec. 1
(ules of ourt (ule ,-6 ?-@, ?.@

/artine$ v. 'an Buskirk, ,4 !hil. 36


K. )egal periods

8 ,.
cf. (ules of ourt ?(&@ (ule --
(A +ec. .,

Internal (evenue v !rimetown, 5( ,2-,11, August -4, -AA3

G. Applicability of !enal )aws

8 ,0, ,3?.@, (! Art. -

). Binding effect

8 ,1
cf. 7 -2

Tenchave$ v. *scaFo ,1 +(A .11
ATI &verseas orp vs. *chin, 5.(. 8o. ,3411,, &ct. ,,, -A,A
5
Tuna !rocessing Inc. v !hil. Gingford, ,4114-, 7eb. -6, -A,-


8 ,2

Amos v Bellis, -A +(A .14

8 ,3

(aytheon v (ou$ie, 5( ,2-460, 7ebruary -2, -AA4

8 ,4
Tamano v &rti$, 5.(. 8o. ,-22A., Kune -6, ,664
)lave vs (epublic, 5( ,26322, /arch .A, -A,,
Hamoranos v !eople, 5.(. 8o. ,6.6A-, Kune ,, -A,,
Vllagraca v S&ara, GR 188832, Aprl 23, 201%


III. !*(+&8+ L !*(+&8A)IT:


A. The concept of a MpersonN and MpersonalityN

8 .3 B .6

lasses of persons and their distinctions
*lements of civil capacity
Kuridical capacity v. personality
Kuridical capacity v. capacity to act

B. ommencement and termination of personality

,. 8atural !ersons

?a@ Birth

8 0A B 0,
,643 onstitution, Art. II +ec. ,-
!.%. 2A. Dhild and :outh Welfare odeE, Art. 1
7 ,20
6
(! Arts. -12 B -16

5elu$ v. A - +(A 4A,
Ouimiging v. Icao .0 +(A ,.0
%e Kesus v. +y#uia 14 !hil 422
ontinental +teel v. /ontano, 5( ,4-4.2, &ctober ,., -AA6


?b@ %eath

8 0-

)imIoco v. Intestate *state of !io 7ragante 4A !hil 332
Valno v Adrano, GR 1828#%, Aprl 22, 201%

8 0.
(& (ule ,., +ec. . ?II@ B ?kk@ ?,646 (ev. (ules on *vidence@

Koa#uin v. 8avarro 6. !hil -13


-. Kuridical !ersons

8 00B03
Batas !ambansa Blg. 24 ?orp. ode@, +ecs. -, 0, ,3
8 ,323B,324


. (estrictions on civil capacity


,. !resumption of capacity, Art. .3 8

atalan vs. Basa, 5.(. 8o. ,16123, Kuly .,, -AA3

-. (estrictions on capacity to act

8 .4 B .6, cf. 8 ,.-3

?a@ /inority
7

,. Age of maIority, (.A. 24A6
-. A./. 8&. A.BA-BA1B+ (ules on 5uardianship
.. +uffrage, +ec. , Art. ' ,643 onstitution Dcf. Sanggunang
'abataan(
0. /arriage, 7 1> 01 ?,@> cf. (.A. 24A6
1. ontracts

8 ,.-3
8 ,.6A ?par. ,@, ,0A. ?par. .@
8 ,.63, ,.66
8 ,046
8 ,0-2 B ,0-3

/ercado v. *spiritu .3 !hil -,1
Bambalan v. /aramba 1, !hil 0,3
+uan hian v. Alcantara 41 !hil 226
Bragan$a v. 'illaBAbrille ,A1 !hil 012


2. riminal liability

(! ,- ?-@ B ?.@>
(! ,. ?-@> !% 2A. +ecs. ,46 P -A0
Also see: (ule ., +ection 1 ,663 (ules of ivil !rocedure
Kuvenile Kustice )aw, +ecs 2 and 3

Ati$ado vs !eople, 5( 8o. ,3.4--, &ctober ,., -A,A

?b@ Insanity

,. /arriage, 7 01 ?-@, Art. 36
-. ontracts, 8 ,.-3 ?,@, ,.-4
.. riminal liability,

(! ,- ?,@
(ule ,A,, (ules of ourt

C+ v. 'aguilar, -3 !hil 44
!eople v. (afanan -A0 +(A 21
8
+tandard &il v. Arenas, 5( 8o. )B16-,, Kuly -1, ,6,,
!eople v Bugalao, 5( ,40313, &ct. 1, -A,,


?c@ %eafB/utism, 8 ,.-3 ?-@, 4A3 L 4-A
?d@ !rodigality, (& (ule 6- +ec. -
?e@ ivil Interdiction, (! .,, .0, 0,

KalosIos v &/*)*, 5.(. 8o. ,6.-.3, &ctober 6, -A,-

?f@ 7amily (elations

7 ,1AB,1,> cf. 7 43, .3, .4
8 ,06A
8 -A.1
cf. 8 62.B623

?g@ Alienage, cf. Art. I', +ecs. ,B1, ,643 onstitution

(eyes v &/*)*, 5.(. 8o. -A3-20, Kune -1, -A,.

?h@ Absence, 8 .4, P .62, 7 0,

&laguer v !urugganan, 5( ,146A3, 7ebruary ,-, -AA3

)i* Insolvency and Trusteeship, 8 ,.4,, ,06,, --.2

Cmale v A+B (ealty, 5( ,4,,-2, Kune ,1, -A,,

)9* 5ender, Art. II, +ec. ,0, ,643 onstitution> cf. 8 0A.
+ee also: (ule . +ection 0, ,663 (ules of ivil !rocedure

):* !hysical Incapacity/%isease, 7 01?1@, 01?2@, 02, 8 4-A

)er" *+ $av", Sr. v Gonzale", et al., GR. No. 18,#22, Jan. 1,
201%

%. %omicile and residence of persons

,. Kuridical persons, 8 1,
10

-. 8atural persons

8 1A
7 24B26, cf. 8 ,,A
cf. 7 11, ,A,, ,06, ,1-, ,A,

KalosIos v &/*)*, 5( ,6,63A, April -0, -A,-



I'. I8T(&%CTI&8 T& T9* 7A/I): &%*

Tolentino, ;!ersons and 7amily (elations in the ivil ode<


A. *ffect and (etroactivity

*.&. -6, as amended by *.&. --3, (.A. 24A6, (.A. 32,A
7 -12, cf. 7 .2 in rel. to .6, 7 ,A1, 7 ,2-, 7 -13

)upo Atien$a v. Kudge Brilliantes, -0. +(A .-
Bernabe vs. AleIo, .30 +(A ,4A
7uentes vs. (oca, 5.(. 8o. ,346A-, April -,, -A,A

B. (epeal/Amendment

7 -10, -11


'. /A((IA5* L !*(+&8A) (*)ATI&8+ B*TW**8 +!&C+*+

A. The concept of ;marriage<

7 , cf. 8 1-, 7 ,06
Art II +ec. ,-, ,643 onstitution
Art. J' +ec. -, ,643 onstitution


B. 8ature of marriage in !hilippine law
11


7 ,
cf. (ule ,., +ec. . ?aa@, ,646 (ules on *vidence,
8 --A
/uslim ode, ?!.%. ,A4.@ +ec. ,0

5oitia vs amposB(ueda, .1 !hils -1-
+ermonia v (epublic, -.. +(A ,11
!erido v !erido, 2. +(A 63
+ilverio vs (epublic, &ctober --, -AA3
!eople v %e )a ru$, 5.(. 8o.,4324., 7ebruary ,,, -A,A
%e +antis v Intestate *state Kalandoni, %ecember ,, -A,A
*spinosa v &mana, A 8o. 6A4,, &ctober ,-, -A,,
Avendo v Avendo, G.R. No. 173,%0, Jan 22 201%
. Agreements prior to marriage

,. +tipulations in marriage

7 , cf. 8 --,

*spinosa v Atty. &mana, A.. 8o. 6A4,, &ctober ,-, -A,,

-. Breach of promise to marry

8 ,6 B -,> 8 -,32> 8 ,0A. -?c@
/ --

9ermosisima v. A ,A6 !hil 2-6
Wassmer v. 'ele$ ,- +(A 204
TanIanco v. A ,4 +(A 660
Baksh v. A, -,6 +(A ,,1
Abanag v /abute, A/ !B,,B-6--, April 0, -A,,


%. (e#uisites for a valid marriage


12
, Tolentino --- B -26

/ariategui v. A -A1 +(A ..3

,. Ginds of re#uisites L effects of nonBcompliance

7 -B.> 7 0> 7 1> 7 .1> 7 01 cf. 8 1.
(! .1AB.1,
%e /iIares vs 'illalu$, -30 +(A ,

-. *ssential re#uisites

?a@ )egal apacity

?i@ 5ender, 7 - ? ,@ cf. 7 ,04

+ilverio vs (epublic, &ctober --, -AA3

?ii@. Age

7 1> 7 .1 ?,@> (.A. 24A6 cf. 7 -,
8 10 L 4A ?,@
(! .00
cf. %&K &pinion ,01 +.,66, ?&ct. ,66,@


?iii@ Absence of impediment, 7 1, .1
5arcia vs. (ecio, .21 +(A 0.3
Te vs. hoa, 5.(. 8o. ,-2002, 8ov. -6, -AAA ?.02 +(A
.-3@
8ollora v !eople, 5( ,6,0-1, +eptember 3, -A,,
Avendo v Avendo, G.R. No. 173,%0, Jan 22 201%

.. !arental consent

7 ,0> 7 01 ?,@

0. onsent freely given by both spouses

?a@. /istake as to identity,
13

7 .1 ?1@> 8 42 ?,@

?b@. *ffect of insanity, 7 01 ?-@

?c@. *ffect of fraud, 7 01 ?.@> 7 02, 8 ,..4 P
,.00

Anaya vs !alaroan, 8ov. -2, ,63A

?d@. *ffect of force, intimidation and undue
influence, 7 01 ?0@> 8 ,..1 P ,..3

'illanueva vs A, 1A1 +cra 120

?e@. *ffect of physical incapacity/impotence, 7
01 ?1@

Kimene$ v. aFi$ares ,A6 !hil -3
Alca$ar v Alca$ar, 5.(. 8o. ,3001,, &ctober ,.,
-AA6

?f@ *ffect of affliction with +T%, 7 01 ?2@> 02 ?.@



1. 7ormal (e#uisites


?a@ /arriage license

(epublic v. A, -.2 +(A -13
+y vs. A, 5.(. 8o. ,-3-2., April ,-, -AAA
Alcantara vs. Alcantara, 5.(. 8o. ,23302, Aug. -4, -AA3
%e astro v %e astro, 5.(. 8o. ,2A,3-, 7ebruary ,., -AA4
Abbas vs Abbas, 5.(. 8o. ,4.462, Kanuary .A, -A,.


,. Where to apply, 7 6 B ,A

14
-. (e#uirements for issuance

a. application, 7 ,,
b. proof of capacity, 7 ,-B,0> 7 -, cf. 8 40

cf. %&K &pinion 1A +. ,66, ?April .A, ,66,@
%&K &pinion ,02 +. ,66, ?&ct. ,3, ,66,@

c. parental advice, 7 ,1
d. marriage counseling, 7 ,2
e. publication, 7 ,3
f. investigation of impediments, 7 ,4
g. payment of fees, 7 ,6
h. family planning certificate, !.%. 621

.. !lace where valid, 7 -A
0. !eriod of validity, 7 -A
1. %uties of the ivil (egistrar, 7 -0B-1

Alcantara vs Alcantara, 5( 8o. ,23302, Aug. -4, -AA3


2. marriages e"empt from license re#uirement

7 -3B.0, cf. 8 32, !.%. ,A4.

8iFal vs. Bayadog, 5.(. ,..334, /ar. ,0, -AAA
%e astro vs. %e astro, 5.(. ,2A,3-, 7ebruary ,.,
-AA4
(epublic vs %ayot, /arch -4, -AA4


?b@ Authority of the solemni$ing officer

,. Who are authori$ed

7 3, ,A, ., L .-
8 12, 30, 32
(.A. 3,2A ?,66, )ocal 5overnment ode@,
+ecs. 000?b@?,@?"viii@, 001 ?b@?,@?"viii@
15

Aranes vs &cciano, .4A +(A 0A-
8avarro v. %omagtoy +.. A./. /TKB62B,A44, Kuly ,6, ,662


-. 9ow authori$ed

7 3 ?-@ cf. 8 6-B62

'illar v. !araiso 62 !hil 216

.. *ffect of absence of authority

7 0> 7 .1 ?-@
(! .1-
cf. Tenchave$ v. *scaFo, ,1 +(A .11 at page .2A


0. %uties of the solemni$ing officer, 7 -.B-0

1. *ffect of irregularity, 7 0


?c@ /arriage eremony

,. form of ceremony, 7 . ?.@> 7 2 cf. 7 .., 7 4

/artine$ v. Tan ,- !hil 3.,
&/!A(* T&: /origo v !eople, 5.(. 8o. ,01--2.
7ebruary A2, -AA0


-. !lace for ceremony, 7 4> 7 -4B-6> 7 .-B..


.. Issuance of marriage certificate, 7 2> 7 --, -.

/adrideIo v. %e )eon 11 !hil ,
!eople v. Borromeo ,.. +(A ,A2

15
*. )aw governing validity of marriages abroad

, Tolentino -2A B -2.

,. 5eneral rule in contracts

?a@ As to form, 8 ,3 ?,@ and ?-@
?b@ As to substantive re#uirements, 8 ,1 L ,3 ?.@

-. +pecial rule in marriage

-a. le/ loc celebraton", 7 -2> 7 -,, 7 ,A

:ao Gee v. +yB5on$ales, ,23 +(A 342
(epublic vs. &rbecido III, 5.(. 8o. ,10.4A, &ctober 1,
-AA1
7uIiki v /arinay, 5.(. 8o. ,62A06, Kune -2, -A,.


?b@ *"ceptions

7 -2 in relation to
7 .1?,@, .1?0@, .1?1@ and ?2@, .2, .3 L .4
cf. 8 3,
%&K &pinion 8o. ,, +. ,66A ?Kan. ,3, ,66A@


7. ommonBlaw marriages/ MliveBinN relationships

7 ,03, cf. (! .1A
7 ,04 ?;adulterous<@
(ule ,., +ec. . ?aa@ P ?cc@, ,646 (ules on *vidence cf. 8
--A
7 -2 par. ,
8 Book II, Title III ?040B1A,@

)esaca v. )esaca, 6, !hil ,.1
:aptinchay v. Torres, -4 +(A 046
*strada v *scritor, A./. 8o. !BA-B,21,, August 0, -AA.

16
5. 'oid /arriages

, Tolentino -3A B .,A

5eneral rule, 7 0

,. Ginds of void marriages

?a@ Absence of re#uisites

cf. 'II ?%@ of &utline
7 .1 cf. 7 -.0, (A 24A6
Alcantara v Alcantara, 5( 8&. ,233002, Aug. ,4,
-AA3
+o v 'alera, 5( ,1A233, Kune 1, -AA6
%e astro v %e astro, 5.(. 8o. ,2A,3-, 7eb. ,.,
-AA4
(epublic v %ayot, 5.(. 8o. ,3114,, /arch -4, -AA4
Abbas vs Abbas, 5.(. 8o. ,4.462, Kanuary .A, -A,.

?b@ Bigamous and polygamous marriages,

7 .1?0@, .6, 0A, 0,, 00
(! .00, .06

/ercado vs Tan, ..3 +(A ,--
Bobis v Bobis, 5( ,.61A6, Kuly .,, -AAA
Ty vs. A, 5.(. 8o.,-30A2, 8ov. -3, -AAA
/origo vs /origo, 0-- +(A
Tenebro vs. A, 5.(. 8o. ,1A314. 7ebruary ,4, -AA0
?read concurring of Kustice 'itug and dissent of Kustice
arpio@
Teves v !eople, 5( ,44331, August -0, -A,,
8ollora v !eople, 5( ,6,0-1, +eptember 3, -A,,
/ontane$ vs ipriano, 5( ,4,A46, &ctober --, -A,-
0apl v People, GR 18380,, Jul1 3, 2013
+ee: Abbas vs Abbas, 5.(. 8o. ,4.462, Kanuary .A,
-A,.
!eople v &dtuhan, 5( ,6,122, Kuly ,3, -A,.
Iwasawa vs 5angan, , 5.(. 8o. -A0,26, +*! ,, -A,.
17

?c@ +ubse#uent marriage, upon reappearance of absent spouse

7 0, in relation to 7 0-B00
8 .6AB.6,, 7 11 ?6@, 7 ,A,

Kones v. 9ortiguela 20 !hil ,36
(epublic vs. 8olasco, --A +(A -A, /arch ,3, ,66.
Bienvenido vs. A, -.3 +(A 232, &ctober -0, ,660
+++ vs Kar#ue, 5.(. 8o. ,21101, /arch -0, -AA2

!rocedure
(epublic v 5ranada, 5( 8o. ,431,-, Kune ,., -A,-


?d@ Bad faith of both spouses, under 7 00, 0., 0A, 01

?e@ !sychological incapacity under 7 .2


7 .2, .6, 24B3.
(.A. 41..

+antos v. A -0A +(A -A
hi /ing Tsoi v. A 5.(. 8o. ,,6,6A, Kan. ,2, ,663
(epublic v /olina, 5.(. 8o. ,A432. 7ebruary ,., ,663
9ernande$ vs. ourt of Appeals, .-A +(A 32,
%ecember A4, ,666
/arcos vs. /arcos, .0. +(A 311, &ctober ,6, -AAA
(epublic vs. %agdag, .1, +(A 0-1
(! vs. OuinteroB9amano, 5.(. 8o. ,06064, /ay -A,
-AA0
Antonio vs.(eyes, 5.(. 8o. ,114AA, /ar. ,A,-AA1
(epublic vs. TanyagB+an Kose, 1,3 +(A ,-., 7ebruary
2, -AA3
Almelor vs (TB)as !inas, 5( 8o. ,362-A, Aug. -2,
-AA4
Te vs Te, 5( 8o. ,2,36., 7eb. ,., -AA6
A$cueta vs (!, 5.(. 8o. ,4A224, /ay -2, -AA6
18
9alili v 9alili, 5( ,210-0, Kune 6, -AA6 ?/otion for
(econ@
8aIera v 8aIera, 5( ,204,3, Kuly ., -AA6
amachoB(eyes v (eyes, 5.(. 8o. ,41-42, August ,4,
-A,A
(epublic vs *ncelan, 5.(. 8o. ,3AA--, Kan. 6, -A,.
Republc v 2e Graca, GR. No. 171,,7, $eb. 12, 201%
?f@ Incestuous marriages, 7 .3 cf. 8 62.B623
?g@ /arriages against public policy

7 .4, compare 7 .4?2@ with 8 4A?2@
(! -02
8 4A?3@, 4-
8 62.B623


?h@ 8onBcompliance under 7 1., 1-
+ec. -,, -- and -., A./. 8o. A-B,,B,AB+. /arch 0, -AA.

-. Who can invoke nullity, 7 .2, 7 .6, 7 0A
+ec. -, A./. 8o. A-B,,B,AB+. /arch 0, -AA.

8iFal vs. Bayadog, 5.(. ,..334, /ar. ,0, -AAA
atalan vs. ourt of Appeals, 1,0 +(A 2A3, 7ebruary 2, -AA3
*nrico vs. 9eirs of +ps. /edinaceli, 5.(. 8o. ,3.2,0,
+eptember -4, -AA3
arlos s. +andoval, 5( ,366--, %ecember ,2, -AA4
Abla$a v (epublic, 5.(. 8o. ,14-64, August ,,, -A,A


.. When to file action for declaration of nullity

7 .6 in relation to 7 -11, -12
7 0-, par. -


0. !rocedure in actions for declaration of nullity

20
a. (e#uisite for valid remarriage, see 'II ?*@?,A@?b@
above
b. +afeguards against collusion, 7 04

/alcampo +in vs. +in, .11 +(A -41
Ancheta vs Ancheta, 0-0 +(A 3-1
(epublic v A, 5.(. 8o. ,16160, 8ovember ,-, -A,-


c. 8o confession of Iudgment, 7 04> cf. 8 -A.1

d. A./. 8o. A-B,,B,AB+. /arch 0, -AA.

Kocson v. (obles -- +(A 1-,
Tolentino v. 'illanueva 12 +(A ,

e. !articipation of the &+5

/endo$a v (epublic, 5( ,13410, 8ovember ,-, -A,-

f. 8o /otion to %ismiss

Aurelio v Aurelio, 5.(. 8o. ,31.23, Kune 2, -A,,

g. &ther /atters

han v han, 5.(. 8o. ,36342, Kuly, ,0, -A,.

1. *ffects of pendency of action for declaration of nullity B Art.
06, ,64, 1A ?-@

2. *ffects of re" 3udcata

/allion vs Alcantara, 1A2 +(A ..2


3. *ffects of final Iudgment declaring nullity

?a@ In general, 7 1AB10, ,64, -,. but see 7
,03B,04
21

?b@ &n remarriage, 7 0A, 0,

Wiegel v. +empioB%iy, ,0. +(A 066 ?,642@
Terre v. Terre, -,, +(A 2
%omingo v. A --2 +(A 13-
ariFo vs. ariFo .1, +(A ,-3
Bobis vs. Bobis, 5.(. 8o. ,.41A6, Kuly .,, -AAA
/ercado vs.Tan, 5.(. 8o ,.3,,A, August ,, -AAA
Ty vs A, .02 +(A .-3
/origo vs /origo, 0-- +(A .32
/ontane$ v ipriano, 5( ,4,A46, &ct. --,
-A,-
7uIiki v /arinay, 5.(. 8o. ,62A06, Kune -2, -A,.

?c@ &n rights L obligations between the former spouses

?d@ &n the property regime of the marriage

7 ,03B,04

'aldes v. OB(T, 5.(. 8o. ,--306, Kuly .,, ,662
%ino v %ino, 5( ,34A00, Kanuary ,6, -A,,
:u v (eyesBarpio, 5( ,46-A3, Kune ,1, -A,,
abre$a v abre$a, 5.(. 8o. ,4,62-, Kanuary ,2, -A,-

?e@ &n MlegitimesN of the common children

7 1AB1., 7 1, in rel to 8 442, 444>
7 ,32
8 6A4, ,A2,
+ec. -,, A./. 8o. A-B,,B,AB+. /arch 0, -AA.
&/!A(* T&: 7 ,03

%ino v %ino, 5( ,34A00, Kanuary ,6, -A,,
&/!A(* T&:
:u v arpioB(eyes, 5( ,46-A3, Kune ,1, -A,,


?f@ &n the status and custody of children, 7 10, -,.
22

?g@ &n use of surnames, 8 Art. .3,, .20, .26

:asin vs +hariQa, 5.(. 8o.60642 7ebruary -., ,661
B. /. 8&. ,2-1 BK&+*!9I8* !. C:BTI/&+A
(emo v %7A, /arch -A,A

?h@ &n hereditary rights, 7 0., ,0, ,%

?i@ *ffect of death, Art. ,A., ,.A

9eirs of 5o v +ervacio, 5( ,131.3, +ept. 3, -A,,



9. 'oidable /arriages

, Tolentino -3A B .,A

1+ 'oid v. voidable marriages, 7 0 cf. 01

Weigel vs. +empioB%y ,0. +(A 066
Terre vs. Terre -,, +(A 2

-. 5rounds for annulment

?a@ Absence of parental consent,

7 0, 1, ,0, 01?,@, 03?,@, .1 ?,@, cf (.A. 24A6

?b@ Insanity, 7 01?-@, 03?-@, 8 Art. ,,06

Gatipunan v Tenorio, .4 &5 ,3-, ,6.3
&ropesa v &ropesa, 5( ,401-4, April -1, -A,-


?c@ 7raud

7 01?.@, 02, 03?.@

23
9ernande$ vs. ourt of Appeals, %ecember A4, ,666

8 ,..4B,.00

Buccat v. Buccat 3- !hil 06
A#uino v. %eli$o ,A4 !hil -,
Anaya v. !alaroan .2 +(A 63
Almelor vs. (T, 5.(. 8o. ,362-A, August -2, -AA4


?d@ 7orce, intimidation and undue influence

7 01?0@, 03?0@
8 ,..1B,..3
(! .00, last paragraph

(ui$ v Atien$a, 0A &.5. ,6A. ?,60,@
'illanueva v A, 1A1 +(A 120

?e@ !hysical incapacity/impotence

7 01?1@, 03?1@

Kimene$ v. aFi$ares ,A6 !hil -3.
+arao v 5uevara, ,60A, 0A &5 ,, +upp -2.
Alca$ar vs Alca$ar, 5( ,3001,, &ctober ,., -AA6

?f@ Affliction with +T%, 7 ?01?2@, compare with 7 02?.@,
03?1@

?g@ &thers

Republc v Albo", G.R. No. 1#8780, *ctober 14, 2013


.. Who can seek annulment, 7 03, +ec. ., A/ 8o. A-B,,B,AB+,
/arch 0, -AA.

0. When to seek annulment. 7 03, 8 ,,06

24
1. !rocedure in actions for annulment, see 'II?*@?,.@?b@B?d@

7 Art. 04, A./. 8o. A-B,,B,AB+. /arch 0, -AA.

Barcelona vs. A, 5. (. ,.AA43, +ept. -0, -AA.

2. *ffects of pendency of action for annulment

7 06, ,64, -,.
A./ 8o. A-B,,B,-B+. /arch 0, -AA.

3. *ffects of annulment, 7 1AB10, 0., ,A-, ,-6, -,.

?a@ In general

hanBTan v han, 5.(. 8o. ,23,.6, 7ebruary -1, -A,A

?b@ &n remarriage, 7 Art. 0A
?c@ &n rights L obligations between the former spouses, ,64
?d@ &n the property regime of the marriage

7 1A, 7 0.?-@ cf. 7 ,A-?0@, ,-6, ,.4
Buenaventura v A, 5.(. 8o. ,-3.14. /arch .,, -AA1
Ouiao v Ouiao, 5. (. 8o. ,4.2--, Kuly 0, -A,-

?e@ &n Mpresumptive legitimes/hereditary rights

7 1AB1., 0. ?-@, 7 1, in rel to 8 442, 444>
7 ,32
8 6A4, ,A2,
7 ,A- ?1@ and ?2@, ,-6 ?4@ and ?6@

:u v (eyesBarpio, 5( ,46-A3, Kune ,1, -A,,

?f@ &n the status and custody of children, 7 10, -,.

?g@ &n use of surnames, 8 Art. .3,, .20, .26

:asin vs +hariQa, 5.(. 8o.60642 7ebruary -., ,661
B./. 8&. ,2-1 BK&+*!9I8* !. C:BTI/&+A
25
(emo v %7A, /arch -A,A


I. /arriage when one spouse is absent

7 0,B00, compare with 8 4., 41?-@ and 43?-@
cf. (! .06

+++ vs. %e Bailon, 5.(. 8o. ,21101, /arch -0, -AA2
'alde$ v (epublic, 5.(. 8o. ,4A42., +eptember 4, -AA6


K. /arriages dissolved by a foreign Iudgment

8 ,1, ,3 ?.@
7 -2

Arca vs Kavier, Kuly .,, ,610
Tenchave$ v. *scaFo, ,1 +(A .11
'an %orn v. (omillo, ,.6 +(A ,.6
+omera v. !ilapil, ,30 +(A 22.
Ouita vs A, .AA +(A 0A2
)lorente vs A, .01 +(A 16-
5arcia vs. (ecio, .22 +(A 0.3
%iego vs astillo, 0.2 +(A 23
(! vs. &rbecido, 5.(.8o. ,10.4A, &ct. 1, -AA1
+an )uis vs. +an )uis, 5.(. ,..30., 7eb. -, -AA3
AmorBatalan vs. a, 5.(. 8o. ,23,A6, 7ebruary 2, -AA3
orpus v +to Tomas, 5.(. 8o. ,4213,, August ,,, -A,A
7uIiki v /arinay, 5.(. 8o. ,62A06, Kune -2, -A,.


G. /arriages giving rise to criminal liability


Art. 0, Art. ,2, Art. 0,
8 40, (! .1,B.1-, 7 ,23B,26

(.A. 2611, ;An Act to %eclare Cnlawful the !ractice of
/atching 7ilipino Women for /arriage to 7oreign 8ationals<
25

(.A. 6-A4, AntiBTrafficking in !ersons Act of -AA., as amended by
(A ,A.20



'I. T9* )AW &8 +*!A(ATI&8 &7 T9* +!&C+*+

A. oncepts of separation L divorce

,. +eparation in fact, 7 -.4B-04, ,A,?.@

'illanueva v hiong, 5( ,16446, Kune 1, -AA4

-. Agreements to separate, 7 ,, 8 --, ?,@

*spinosa v &mana, A.. 8o. 6A4,, &ctober, ,-, -A,,

.. Absolute divorce

?a@ %ivorce under the 7amily ode

7 -2, paragraph -
Tenchave$ v. *scaFo, ,1 +(A .11
'an %orn v. (omillo, ,.6 +(A ,.6
+omera v. !ilapil, ,30 +(A 22.
7uIiki v /arinay, 5.(. 8o. ,62A06, Kune -2, -A,.


?b@ %ivorce under the /uslim ode, / 01B11

)lave v (epublic, 5.(. 8o. ,26322, /arch .A, -A,,
Hamoranos v !eople, 5.(. 8o. ,6.6A-, Kune ,, -A,,



B. oncept of legal separation, compare with 8 63

,. 5rounds for legal separation P Art. 11 7, (A 6-2-

26
A./. 8o. A-B,,B,,B+. /arch 0, -AA.


?a@ +e"ual infidelity or perversion

7 11?4@
8 .2
(! ... L ..0
(! -03

5oitia v. amposB(ueda .1 !hil -1-
5andionco v. !eFaranda ,11 +(A 3-1
Galaw v 7ernande$, 5( ,22.13, +eptember ,6, -A,,
(epublic v Ouintos, 5( ,16160, 8ovember ,-, -A,-

?b@ %rug addiction, habitual alcoholism, lesbianism or
homose"uality

7 11 ?1@ and ?2@ compare with 7 02?0@

Almelor v (T, 5( 8o. ,362-A, Aug. -2, -AA4
ampos v ampos, A./. 8o. /TKB,AB,32,, 7eb. A4, -A,-


?c@ Attempt on the life of the other spouse

7 11?6@, compare with 8 63?-@
(ep. Act 6-2-

?d@ Abandonment

7 Art. 11 ?,A@
7 ,A, par. ., compare with separation in fact
(epublic v Ouintos, 5( ,16160, 8ovember ,-, -A,-

?e@ &ther grounds

7 11 ?,@
5oitia vs amposB(ueda, .1 !hils -1-
Galaw v 7ernande$, 5( ,22.13, +eptember ,6, -A,,
27

-. Who can ask for legal separation

7 11, compare with 8 66

.. When may petition be filed

7 13, compare with 8 ,A-, 8 66

)apu$ v. *ufemio 0. +(A ,33
/atubis v. !ra"edes, ,A6 !hil 346
!eople v. Hapata 44 !hil 244


0. ourt procedure in legal separation

7 14B2A>
+ec ,6, (A 6-2-
A./. 8o. A-B,,B,,B+. /arch 0, -AA.

Araneta vs oncepcion, 66 !hil 3A6
&campo v 7lorenciano, ,A3 !hil .1
)apu$ vs *ufemio, 0. +(A ,33
+amosa vs 'amenta, Kr., 02 +(A ,,A
!acete v. ariaga, -., +(A .-,

1. *ffect of pendency of the petition, 7 2,B2-

?a@ coolingBoff period, 7 14
?b@ right of consortium, 7 2, par. ,
?c@ administration of property, 7 2, par. -

%e la 'iFa v. 'illareal 0, !hil ,.
+abalones v. A -.A +(A 36


?d@ +upport and custody pendente lte

7 2- cf. 7 06, 7 ,64
:angco v. (hode, , !hil 0A0
28
%e la 'iFa v. 'illareal, 0, !hil ,.
Araneta v. oncepcion 66 !hil 3A6
(amos v. 'amenta 02 +(A ,,A
)erma v. A 2, +(A 00A


2. %efenses in actions for legal separation P 7 Art. 12

?a@ onsent

7 12?-@> 8 ,AA

/atubis v. !ra"edes, ,A6 !hil 346
!eople v. +ansano 1A !hil 3.
!eople v. +chneckenberger 3. !hil 0,.

?b@ ondonation

7 12?,@
5ine$ v. Bugayong ,AA !hil 2,2

?c@ (ecrimination

7 12?0@
Brown v. :ambao ,A- !hil ,24
&ng vs &ng, 5.(. 8o. ,1.-A2, &ctober -., -AA2

?d@ ollusion//utual onsent

7 2A
7 12?.@, ?1@, compare with 8 ,A, and --,?.@
Brown v. :ambao, supra
&campo v. 7lorenciano ,A3 !hil .1
(epublic v A, 8ovember ,-, -A,-


3. *ffects of decree of legal separation

?a@ &n personal relations, 7 2.
?b@ &n the custody of children
30

7 2.?.@> 7 -,.
8 ,A2?.@
!.%. 2A. ?:W@ Art. ,3 par. .
/atute v. /acadaeg, 66 !hil .0A, /ay .A, ,612

?c@ &n property relations

7 2.?-@, 7 20, 7 Art. ,A- ?0@, ,-6 ?3@
Ouiao v Ouiao, 5. (. 8o. ,4.2--, Kuly 0, -A,-

?d@ &n support, 7 ,64

?e@ &n the use of surname, 8 .3-

)aperal v. (epublic ,,2 !hil 23-

?f@ &n hereditary rights, 7 2.?0@

?g@ &ther *ffects, 7 20

?h@ +olo !arents Act P (A 463-

4. (econciliation, 7 21B23

6. *ffect of death of one of the parties

)apu$ vs. *ufemio 0. +(A .,0
/acadangdang vs. A ,A4 +(A .,0



'II. (I59T+ A8% &B)I5ATI&8+ &7 +!&C+*+

, Tolentino ..4 B .11
cf. 8 ,,.B,,0


A. &bligation to love each other, 7 24

31
B. &bligation to live with the other spouse

,. 5eneral rule and e"ceptions

7 24 P 3,> 7 3-
Art. ,AA> ,-3> ,A,> ,-4
8 6-, ?0@
(! ,, ?-@
(! -03
(epublic v /olina, 5.(. 8o. ,A432. 7ebruary ,., ,663
5oitia v. amposB(ueda, .1 !hils -1-
Arroyo v. 'as#uesBArroyo 0- !hil 10
uaderno v. uaderno ,- +(A 1A1
Ilusorio vs. Bildner, 5.(. 8o. ,.6346. /ay ,-, -AAA.


-. %esignation of domicile

?a@ 5eneral rule: Iointly
7 26 par. ,, compare with 8 ,,A
Abella v. &/*)*, -A, +(A ..1
%e la 'iFa v. 'illareal, 0, !hil ,. at pp. ,2B-,

?b@ *"ception, 7 26 par. -


. Koint management of family life

7 3,, 60 ?last par.@, ,-, ?last par.@, ,--, ,02


%. Koint &bligation to +upport

7 3A, ,60, 60 ?,@, 60 ?last par.@, ,-,, ,-- ?,@, ,02

+++ v %e los +antos, 5.(. 8o. ,2036A, August -6, -AA4
+++ v 7avila, 5.(. 8o. ,3A,61, /arch -4, -A,,
alderon vs (o"as, 5.(. 8o. ,41161, Kan. A6, -A,.


32
*. The right to e"ercise a profession or calling

7 3., compare with 8 ,,3, (A ,A13- ?/ay -0, -A,.@
7 Art. 60 ?-@, ?.@> 7 Art. ,-, ?-@, ?.@
Art. II +ec. ,0 and Art. JIII +ec. ,0, ,643 onstitution
cf. 8 ,,. compare with (& (ule . +ec. 0

cf. R.A. 71#2, ;An Act !romoting the Integration of Women as
7ull L *#ual !artners of /en in %evelopment and 8ation
Building<

cf. R.A. 8187, ;An Act 5ranting !aternity )eave...<

(A 63,A, /agna arta of Women

7. (elated rights/obligations

(epublic v /olina, 5.(. 8o. ,A432. 7ebruary ,., ,663
:asin v. +hariah ourt -0, +(A ?,661@

5. *nforcement of (ights of Women and hildren
(epublic Act 8o. 6-2- P AntiB'iolence Against Women and hildren
+harica /ari 5o Tan vs +pouses Tan, 5( 8o. ,2441-, +ept.
.A, -AA4
+an %iego vs (T, 5.(. 8o. ,6.62A, Kan. A3, -A,.
5ua v 6angrobang, G.R. No. 170701, Januar1 22, 201%


'III. !(&!*(T: (*)ATI&8+ &7 T9* +!&C+*+

A. (e#uisites for validity of marriage settlements

7 Art. 31> ,.A ?.@> ,A. ?.@

,. !rior to marriage: modifications

7 ,> 7 32 ?modifications after marriage@
7 22, 23, ,-4, ,.1, ,.2
33

!ana vs. 9eirs of Kuanite, +r., 5.(. 8o. ,20-A,,
%ecember ,A, -A,-

-. 7orm L registration re#uirement, 7 33, 8 ,.13, ,.14,
8 3A6

.. elebration of the marriage, 7 4, cf. Art. 42 ?,@

B. !arties to a marriage settlement

?a@ minors, 7 34, ,0, -,,, --1
?b@ persons under civil interdiction, 8 Art. .4, .6,
7 36, (! .0, 7 ,.1 ?,@
?c@ incapacitated persons, 7 36, in rel. to 8 .4B.6

. Which law governs property relations, 7 30

,. +tipulation in marriage settlements, 7 4A
-. If both 7ilipinos
.. /i"ed marriage between 7ilipino and alien
0. If both aliens
1. 7or property located outside (!

7 4A ?-@ and ?.@ in rel. to 8 ,2
7 4A ?.@ in rel. To 8 ,3 ?,@


%. %onations propter nupta"

,. %efinition, 7 4-

+olis v +olis, 1. !hil 6,- D,6-4E
'elas#ue$ v A, 5.(. 8o. ,-2662. 7ebruary ,1, -AAA
Abobon v Abobon, 5.(. 8o. ,114.A, August ,1, -A,-

-. 7orm of %onations, 7 Art. 4., 8 Arts. 304B306

'alencia v )o#uiao, 5( ,--,.0, &ctober ., -AA.
34
%oronio v 9eirs, 5.(. 8o. ,26010, %ecember -3, -AA3

.. Who may be donors P 7 Art 4-, 4., 40

0. What may be donated by a spouse as donor

?a@ present property, 7 40, ,A3A, 3-A
?b@ future property, 7 40> 8 32,

/ateo vs )agua, -6 +(A 420

?c@ encumbered property, 7 41
?d@ donations in the marriage settlements, 7 4,


1. 'oid donations by the spouses, 7 43

?a@ %onations during the marriage

hing v 5oyanko, 5( ,21436, 8ovember ,A, -AA2


?b@ %onations in common law marriages

/atabuena v. ervantes .4 +(A -40
+++ v %avac, 5.(. 8o. )B-,20-. Kuly .A, ,622
Bienvenido v. ourt of Appeals, -.3 +(A 232
+umbad vs A, .A4 (A 131
Arcaba vs. Tabancura vs. de Batocael, 5.(. 8o.
,0224.. 8ov. --, -AA,


2. (evocation of donations propter nupta", 7 4,, 42?,@


?a@ revocation by donor, 7 42> 8 321> 7 Art. 1A> 0. ?.@

/ateo vs )agua, -6 +(A 420

?b@ by operation of law, 7 00> 2,> 0. ?.@
35



*. Absolute community of property ?A!@

,. When applicable, 7 31, ,A. ?.@> ,.A ?.@> 6- ?.@

-. ommencement, 7 44

.. Waiver during marriage, 7 46 ?,@ cf 8 ,24

0. Waiver after marriage, 7 46 par. -

1. +uppletory rules:

oBownership, 7 6A> of 8 040B1A,

2. What constitutes A!, 7 6,

?a@ All property at time of marriage
?b@ !roperty ac#uired subse#uently
?c@ Winnings from gambling, 7 61 cf 8 ,20
?d@ !resumption of A!, 7 6. of 8 ,2A

/uller v /uller, 5.(. 8o. ,062,1, August -6, -AA2
Beumer v Amores, 5( ,6123A, %ecember ., -A,-

3. What is e"cluded from A!, 7 6-> 8ote: 7 ,0-

Abrenica v Abrenica, 5.(. 8o. ,4A13-, Kune ,4, -A,-

4. harges upon A!, 7 60

)u$on +urety o., Inc. vs %e 5arcia, .A +(A ,,,
5elano vs A, ,A. +(A 6A
5BTractors, Inc., vs A, ,.1 +(A ,6-

?a@ 7amily e"penses cf. 7 ,AA ?.@, 7 ,-,?1@ and 7 60 ?,@,
?0@, ?1@

35
7rancisco v 5on$ales, 5.(. 8o. ,33223, +eptember ,3,
-AA4

?b@ %ebts of spouses, Art. 60 ?-@ and ?.@
?c@ +ubsidiary liabilities, Art. 60 ?6@

Buado vs. A, 5.(. 8o. ,01---, April -0, -AA6

?d@ +ole obligations of a spouse, Art. 60
?e@ 5ambling losses, 7 61
?f@ &ther charges, Art. 60

6. &wnership, 7 6A, 7 62 in rel. to 8 -A2

,A. Administration and enIoyment of A!

?a@ Ioint administration, 7 62> 7 6A

%ar v )egasto, 5.(. 8o. ,0.A,2, August .A, -AAA


?b@ +ole administration

?,@ incapacity, 7 62 ?-@ P no court order

Cy vs. A, .02 +(A -02

?-@ separation in fact 7 ,AA ?.@, ,0- P with court
order, of separate property
?.@ abandonment, 7 ,A, P with court order
?1@ pendency of legal separation proceeding, 7
2, P with court order

?c@ %isposition and encumbrance, 7 62B64

/atthews vs. Taylor, 5( ,20140, Kune --, -AA6

,,. *ffect of separation de +acto, 7 ,AA> ,A,> cf. 7 -.6

,-. *ffect of abandonment, 7 ,A,, 7 3-, -.6
36

,.. auses for dissolution of A!, 7 66

?a@ %eath, 7 ,A. cf. (ule 3. +ec. ,- (&

9eirs of 5o v +ervacio, 5( ,131.3, +ept. 3, -A,,

?b@ )egal separation, 7 2.?-@> 7 22
?c@ Annulment and declaration of nullity, 7 1A in rel. to
7 0. ?-@, ,03, ,04
?d@ Kudicial separation of property, 7 ,.0B,.4

Cgalde v :sasi, 5( ,.A2-., 7ebruary -6, -AA4


,0. *ffects of dissolution

?a@ )i#uidation procedure, 7 ,A-

Ouiao v Ouiao, 5. (. 8o. ,4.2--, Kuly 0, -A,-

?b@ 7or cause other than death, 7 0. ?-@> 7 2.?-@> ,03>
,04
?c@ Termination due to death, 7 ,A.

Buenaventura v A, 5.(. 8o. ,-3.14. /arch .,, -AA1
%ino v %ino, 5( ,34A00, Kanuary ,6, -A,,
:u v (eyesBarpio, 5( ,46-A3, Kune ,1, -A,,

,1. 7or marriages before 7, 7 ,A0 cf Art. ,A. ?.@

%eli$o v. %eli$o, 26 +(A -,2

,2. +upport during A! li#uidation, 7 ,64, ,AA?,@


7. onIugal partnership of gains

Belcodero v. A --3 +(A .A.
+ps. *stonina v. A 5.(. 8o. ,,,103, Kan. -3, ,663
37
Ouiao v Ouiao, 5. (. 8o. ,4.2--, Kuly 0, -A,-
&rpiano vs Tomas, 5.(. 8o. ,342,,, Kan. ,0, -A,.


,. When !5 commences and applies

?a@ /arriages under 7, 7 ,A3 cf. 7 44, 7 46

?b@ /arriages before 7, 7 ,A1?-@ of 7 -12

astro vs. /iat, .63 +(A -3,

?c@ When applicable, 7 ,A1 of 7 30B32, ,A3, 44, 46

?d@ +uppletory rules, 7 ,A4 cf. 8 ,323B,324


-. What is included in the !5, 7 Art. ,A2, ,,3, ,,1, ,,4,
,,6, ,-A

Titan v %avid, 5.(. 8o. ,26104, /arch ,1, -A,A
Imani vs. /etrobank, 5.(. 8o. ,43A-., 8ov. ,3, -A,A.
%ewara v )amela, 5( ,36A,A, April ,,, -A,,
L! v. E7utable P08 9an:, G.R. No. 183#18. Januar1
1,, 201%.


.. What is e"cluded from !5, 7 ,A6

?a@ Brought as e"clusive property, 7 ,A6?,@

)aperal v. Gatigbak, ,A +(A 06.
7rancisco v A, 5.(. 8o. ,A-..A, 8ov. -1, ,664
Tan v Andrade, 5( ,3,6A0, Aug 3, -A,.


?b@ Ac#uired by gratuitous title during marriage,
7 ,A6 ?-@ cf 7 ,,., 7 ,,0, 7 ,,1, 8 ,A,1

'eloso v. /artine$, -4 !hil -11
38
Berciles v. 5+I+,,-4 +(A 1., cf. 7 ,,1

?c@ Ac#uired by redemption/e"change, 7 ,A6?.@, 8
,2A,, ,2,6

!lata v. :atco, ,- +(A 3,4

?d@ !urchased with e"clusive money, 7 ,A6?0@> of 7
,,4B,,6

?e@ !roperties of parents

)aurena vs A, 5( ,16--A, +eptember --, -AA4


0. Administration of e"clusive property

?a@ By the spouseBowner, 7 ,,A
?b@ By the other spouse, 7 ,,A?-@> 7 ,0-, 31, --3

R 'eloso v. /artine$, -4 !hil -11
/anotok (ealty v. A, ,06 +(A .3-
&ng vs A, -A0 +(A -63

1. *ncumbrance/disposition of e"clusive property
7 ,,,B,,-, amended by (A ,A13-, 7 -.2, amended
by (A 24A6

Wong et al. v. IA -AA +(A 36-


2. What constitutes !5

?a@ %efinition, 7 ,A2
?b@ !resumption of !5, 7 ,,2

%ewara v )amela, 5( ,36A,A, April ,,, -A,,
%e )a !ena v Avila, 5.(. 8o. ,4306A, 7eb. 4, -A,-
Ouiao v Ouiao, 5. (. 8o. ,4.2--, Kuly 0, -A,-

40

? c@ What are included in !5, 7 ,,3, ,,1, ,,4, ,,6,
,-A

'illanueva vs A, 0-3 +(A 0.6
/endo$a v. (eyes ,-0 +(A ,10
Aguete v !8B, 5( ,3A,22, April 2, -A,,

?d@ If property bought by installments, 7 Art. ,,4
Kovellanos v A, 5.(. 8o. ,AA3-4 Kune ,4, ,66-
Tarrosa vs. %e )eon, 5( ,41A2., Kuly -., -AA6
?e@ redits due, 7 ,,6

?f@ Improvements on !5 property, 7 ,-A

/uno$, Kr. v (amire$, 5( ,12,-1, August -1, -A,A


3. harges upon and obligations of !5, 7 ,-,, ,--

/ariano vs A, ,30 +(A 16
Ayala vs A, -42 +(A -3-
hing vs A, 0-. +(A .12
9omeowners vs. %ailo, 5.(. 8o. ,1.4A-, /ar.,,, -AA1
Ando v ampo, 5( ,40AA3, 7ebruary ,2, -A,,

?a@ With consent

5BTractors v. A, ,.1 +(A ,6-
&ng v. A -A0 +(A -63
Ayala Investment vs. A ?7ebruary ,-, ,664@
+ecurity Bank vs. /ar Tiera orp., 5.(. 8o. ,0..4-,
8ov. -6, -AA2
Aguete v !8B, 5( ,3A,22, April 2, -A,,

?b@ Without consent

ostuna vs. %omondon, ,4A +(A ...
41
arlos vs. Abelardo, .4A +(A .2,
'illanueva vs hiong, 5( 16446, Kune 1, -AA4
(avina v 'illaBAbrille, 5( 8o. ,2A3A4, &ct. ,2, -AA6
7uentes v (oca, 5( 8o. ,346A-, April -,, -A,A


?c@ personal debts, 7 ,--, RP0 108

!eople v. )agrimas, -6 +(A ,1.
Buado vs Buado, 5.(. 8o. ,01---, April -0, -AA6
!ana vs. 9eirs of Kuanite, +r., 5.(. 8o. ,20-A,,
%ecember ,A, -A,-

?d@ winnings from gambling, 7 ,-.


4. &wnership, administration and enIoyment

?a@ Koint administration, 7 ,-0 cf. 7 62, ,0-

5uiang vs A, -6, +(A .3-
(o"as v. A ,64 +(A 10, D,66,E
%ocena vs. )apesura, .11 +(A 214
Alinas vs Alinas, 5( 8o. ,14A0A, April ,0, -AA4
Aggabao vs. !arulan, 5.(. 8o. ,214A., +ept. ,, -A,A


?b@ +ole administration

?,@ Incapacity, 7 ,-0, ,-3, -1.

Cy vs. A, .02 +(A -02

?-@ +eparation in fact, 7 ,AA ?.@, ,-3?.@
?.@ Abandonment, 7 ,A,, ,-4
R
?0@ !endency of legal separation proceedings, 7 2,

+abalones v. A -.A +(A 36
42

?c@ %isposition and encumbrance, 7 ,-0B,-1> 7 63,
,-,

heeseman v. IA ,6. +(A 6.
7ren$el vs. atito, 5.(. 8o. ,0.614, Kuly ,,, -AA.
'illaranda vs. 'illaranda, 5.(. 8o. ,1.003, 7eb. -., -AA0
(avina v 'illaBAbrille, 5( 8o. ,2A3A4, &ct. ,2, -AA6
+iochi v 5o$on, 5.(. 8o. ,266AA, /arch ,4, -A,A
7uentes vs. (oca, 5.(. 8o. ,346A-, April -,, -A,A
Aguete v !8B, 5( ,3A,22, April 2, -A,,
7lores v )indo, 5( ,4.640, April ,., -A,,


6. *ffect of separation de +acto, 7 ,-3, 7 ,AA cf. 7 -.6


,A. *ffect of abandonment, 7 ,-4 cf. 7 ,A,

!artosaBKo v. A -,2 +(A 26.

,,. %issolution of !5, 7 ,-2

?a@ %eath, 7 ,-2 ?,@, ,.A

9eirs of 5o v +ervacio, 5( ,131.3, +ept. 3, -A,,

?b@ )egal separation, 7 2. ?-@, 7 22
?c@ Annulment and declaration of nullity, 7 1A in rel.
to 7 0. ?-@
?d@ Kudicial separation of property, 7 ,.0B,.4

Cgalde v :sasi, 5( ,.A2-., 7ebruary -6, -AA4


,-. *ffects of dissolution, 7 ,-6

Tarrosa vs %e )eon, 5( ,41A2., Kuly -., -AA6
abre$a v abre$a, 5( ,3,-2A, +eptember ,,, -AA6

43

?a@ )i#uidation procedure, 7 ,-6

Ouiao v Ouiao, 5. (. 8o. ,4.2--, Kuly 0, -A,-

?b@ ause other than death, 7 ,-6> 7 0.?-@, 7 2.?-@
?c@ termination due to death> 7 ,.A, cf. 7 ,A0

,.. 7or marriages before 7, 7 ,.,

,0. Applicability of (ules of ourt, 7 ,.-

,1. +upport during !5 li#uidation, 7 ,..

+antero v. 7I, ,1. +(A 3-4


5. (egime of separation of property

,. When applicable

?a@ In the marriage settlements, 7 ,0.B,02
?b@ When mandatory, 7 ,A. L 7 ,.A
?c@ (econciliation in legal separation, 7 22?-@
?d@ Kudicial separation of property, 7 ,.1B,02

Cgalde v :sasi, 5( ,.A2-., 7ebruary -6, -AA4

-. !roperty covered, 7 ,00

.. Administration

?a@ By the ownerBspouse, 7 ,01
?b@ By the other spouse, 7 ,0-, ,A,
?c@ 7 ,AA ?.@> ,A,

0. 7amily e"penses, 7 ,02

1. onveyances between the spouses, 7 43, 8 ,06A

44

9. Kudicial separation of property

,. When possible, 7 ,.0

/a#uilan vs /a#uilan, Kune 4, -AA3

-. 7or sufficient cause, 7 ,.1, (! .0, cf. 7 11 ?,A@>
--6?0@, -.,, -.-

Cgalde v :sasi, 5( ,.A2-., 7ebruary -6, -AA4
+ales v +ales, 5( ,304A., Kuly ,., -AA6

.. 'oluntary separation of property, 7 ,.2, 7 30B31, 7 ,.0

0. *ffects of Iudicial separation of property

?a@ li#uidation of !5 or A!, 7 ,.3 par. ,
?b@ support pendente lite, 7 ,.3 par. -
?c@ regime after K+!, 7 ,.4 of 7 22 ?-@
?d@ binding effect on third parties, 7 ,.6B,0A> of 7 22?-@

)aperal v Gatigbak, ,,2 !hil 23-

1. (evival of property regime after K+!, 7 ,0, cf. 7 23, ,.1,
,0-

2. Transfer of administration of e"clusive property, 7 ,0- 7
62> 7 ,-0


I. !roperty regime of unions without marriage

Reve;: 7 2, .1 ?-@, .1 ?.@, .1 ?1@, .2, .4, 1.> 7 0,, 00> 7 01
?'oid and voidable marriages@

,. Cnions under 7 ,03, 2, .1, .2, 1., cf. 8 ,00

'aldes v. O (T, 5.(. 8o. ,--306, Kuly .,, ,662
arino vs. arino, 5( ,.-1.6, 7ebruary ., -AA,
45
5on$ales vs 5on$ales, 034 +(A .-3
%iFo v %iFo, 5( ,34AA0, Kanuary ,6, -A,,
Sala", Jr., v Agula, G.R. No. 202370, SEP 23 2013


-. Cnions under 7 ,04 of 7 1A in rel. to 7 06?-@ and 7
1A, .3, .4, and 00

Bienvenido v. A -.3 +(A 232
Agapay vs Agapay, -32 +(A .0A
Tumlos vs. +ps. 7ernande$, 5.(. 8o. ,.321A, Apr ,-, -AAA
Adriano v A, .-4 +(A 3.4
/alilin vs astillo, ... +(A 2-4
'illanueva vs A, 0-3 +(A 0.6
Atien$a vs.de astro,5.(. 8o. ,261264, 8ov. -6, -AA2
+igney v +++, 5( 8o. ,3.14-, Kan. -4, -AA4
Borromeo vs %escallar, 5( 8o. ,16.,A, 7eb. -0, -AA6
9eirs of /aramag vs %e 5u$man, 5( ,4,,.-, Kune 1, -AA6
)acbayan v +amoy, 5.(. 8o. ,210-3, /arch -,, -A,, ?see K.
BrionNs +eparate &pinion@
5oB Bangayan v Bangayan, 5.(. 8o. -A,A2,, Kuly ., -A,.


K. !roperty (elations of /i"ed /arriages

Borromeo vs %escallar, 5( 8o. ,16.,A, 7eb. -0, -AA6
heeseman v. IA ,6. +(A 6.
/atthews vs. Taylor, 5( ,20140, Kune --, -AA6
7ren$el vs. atito, 5.(. 8o. ,0.614, Kuly ,,, -AA.
/uller v /uller, 5.(. 8o. ,062,1, August -6, -AA2
!acific Ace v :anagisawa, 5.(. 8o. ,31.A., April ,,, -A,-
Beumer v Amores, 5( ,6123A, %ecember ., -A,-

45
IJ. 7A/I): (*)ATI&8+

A. What governs family relations, 7 ,06, onstitution Art. II, +ec.
,- and Art. J'

B. *ffects of family relationship on legal disputes

7 ,1A B ,1,
8 -A.1
(& (ule ,2 +ec. ,?I@
(! -A, -03 and ..-

5ayon v. 5ayon, .2 +(A ,A0
Wainwright v. 'erso$a, -2 +(A 34
/agbaleta vs 5onong, 32 +(A 1,,
Tribiana vs.Tribiana, 5.(. 8o. ,.3.16, +ept. ,., -AA0
9iyas +avings vs. AcuFa, 5.(. 8&. ,10,.-, August .,, -AA2
)er" *+ $av", Sr. v Gonzale", et al., GR. No. 18,#22, Jan. 1, 201%


. The 7amily 9ome

,. What constitutes the family home, 7 ,1-, ,12, ,2,
-. Who may constitute the family home, 7 ,1-, 7 ,2,
.. When deemed constituted, 7 ,1.

0. Beneficiaries, 7 ,10, ,14, ,60B,62, ,66

!atricio vs. %ario, 5.(. 8o. ,3A4-6, 8ovember -A, -AA2

1. When terminated, 7 ,1. compare with 7 ,16

Arriola v Arriola, 5( ,333A., Kanuary -4, -AA4

2. *"emptions, 7 ,11, 7 ,13, 7 ,2A
3. When may be sold, 7 ,14
46
9onrado v A, 5( ,22..., 8ov. -1, -AA1
abang vs Basay, 5( 8o. ,4A143, /arch -A, -AA6
7ortale$a v )apitan, 5( ,34-44, August ,1, -A,-

4. (ights of creditors, 7 ,13, ,2AB,2-

(amos v !angilinan, 5( ,416-A, Kuly -A, -A,A
*#uitable v &K /ark, 5.(. 8o. ,2161A, August ,,, -A,A
%e /esa v Acero, 5.(. 8o. ,41A20, Kanuary ,2,
-A,-


J. !AT*(8IT: A8% 7I)IATI&8

A. oncepts of paternity, filiation and legitimacy, 7 ,2.

B. )egitimate children, 7 ,20 cf. 7 ,21 in rel to 8 -12B-13,
,22, ,23, ,24, ,26

Angeles vs /aglaya, 026 +(A .2.
+++ vs. Aguas, 5.(. ,21102, 7eb. -3, -AA2
(ivera vs 9eirs, 5( 8o. ,0,1A,, Kuly -,, -AA2
+untay v +untay, 5( ,4.A1., &ctober ,A, -A,-


,. Who are considered legitimate children

?a@ onceived during marriage cf. (& (ule ,., +ec.
.?dd@, 7 Art. ,24

,. valid marriage

Arbolario v A, 5.(. 8o. ,-6,2., April --, -AA.
ontinental +teel v /ontano, &ct. ,., -AA6

-. terminated marriage under 7 0- in rel. to 7
0.?,@
.. void marriages under 7 10
0. voidable marriages, 7 01

47
+untay v +untay, 5( ,.-1-0, %ec. -6, ,664

?b@ Born during marriage, 7 ,20
?c@ onceived by artificial insemination cf. 8 0A,
7 ,20
?d@ Adopted children, (A 411-, +ec. ,3

(ivera v (amire$, 5( ,46263, Kune -3, -A,-

?e@ )egitimated children, ,33, ,34


-. (ights of legitimate children, 7 ,3.B,30

8 .20, .30, .32
8 444, 8 636

/oore v. (epublic, 4 +(A -4-
8aldo$a v. (epublic, ,,- +(A 214
&ng vs A, -3- +(A 3-1
(ep. vs A, .AA +(A ,.4

. Illegitimate children

,. Who are considered illegitimate

?a@ under 8
?b@ under 7 ,21
Cy v hua, 5.(. 8o. ,4.621, +eptember ,4, -AA6

-. (ights of illegitimate children, 7 ,3., ,3-, ,31B,32

&smeFa de 'alencia v. (odrigue$, 40 !hil ---
Briones vs. /iguel, 00A +(A 011, &ctober ,4, -AA0
/aramag vs %e 5u$man, 5( ,4,,.-, Kune 1, -AA6
%e la ru$ vs 5racia, 5.(. 8o. ,333-4, Kuly .,, -AA6
/anungas v )oreto, 5( ,6.,2,, August --, -A,,
5otardo v Buling, 5( ,21,22, August ,1, -A,-
48
Grande v Antono, G.R. No. 2042%8, $ebruar1 18, 201%

%. Action to impugn legitimacy

(eyes vs. /auricio, 5.(. 8o. ,31A4A, 8ovember -0, -A,A

,. 5rounds, 7 ,22

?a@ !hysical impossibility of access

Andal v. /acaraig, 46 !hil ,21
/acadangdang v. A, ,AA +(A 3.
oncepcion vs. A, 5.(. 8o. ,-.01A, Aug. .,, -AA1

?b@ Biological or other scientific grounds

A./. 8o. A2B,,B1B+ ?(C)* &8 %8A *vidence@
7 ,3A, ,3,

Agustin, Kune ,1, -AA1
9errera vs. Alba, 5.(. 8o. ,04--A, Kune ,1, -AA1
*state v. %ia$, 5.(. 8o. ,3,3,., %ec. ,3, -AA3
)ucas v )ucas, 5( 8o. ,6A3,A, Kune 2, -A,,

?c.@ 7 ,22?.@

-. *ffect of a motherNs declaration, 7 ,23

hua Geng 5iap v. IA, ,14 +(A ,4


.. In subse#uent marriages, 7 ,24, ,26

!eople v Ouitoriano, Kanuary -A, ,663

0. !resumptions, 7 ,3A, ,3,

1. !rescription of action to impugn legitimacy

50
5aspay v. A, -.4 +(A ,2.

2. Who may impugn

Benite$BBadua v. A, --6 +(A 024
)iyao, Kr. vs. TanhotiB)iyao, .34 +(A 12.
(epublic v /agpayo, 5( ,46032, 7eb. -, -A,,

*. !roof of 7iliation

,. &f legitimate children, 7 ,3-B,3.

%ia$ vs. ourt of Appeals, ,-6 +(A 2-,, Kune --, ,640
Tison vs. ourt of Appeals, -32 +(A 14-, Kuly .,, ,663
Trinidad vs. ourt of Appeals, -46 +(A ,44, April -A, ,664
9eirs of onti v A, 5.(. 8o. ,,4020, %ecember -,, ,664
%e Kesus vs. *state of Kuan 5amboa %i$on, .22 +(A 066

-. &f illegitimate children, 7 ,31

Kison vs. A, -42 +(A 061
9eirs of 5abatan vs A, 5( ,1A-A2, /arch ,., -AA6
%ela ru$ , et al vs. 5racia, 5.(. 8o. ,333-4, Kuly .,, -AA6
)ucas v )ucas, 5.(. 8o. ,6A3,A, Kune 2, -A,,
5otardo v Buling, 5( ,21,22, August ,1, -A,-
!erla v Baring, 5( ,3-03,, 8ovember ,-, -A,-

.. (ights of illegitimate children, 7 ,32

0. ompulsory recognition, cf. (! .01

!eople v Abella, 5.(. 8o. ,33-61, Kanuary 2, -A,A


7. )egitimated hildren

,. who may be legitimated, 7 ,33, (A 6414

Abadilla vs Tabiliran, -06 +(A 003
51

-. 9ow legitimation takes place, 7 ,34, 7 ,4A

.. (etroactivity and effects, 7 ,4AB,4,

0. Action to impugn legitimation, 7 ,4-

1. (ights of legitimated children, 7 ,36


JI. A%&!TI&8

)a$atin v. ampos, 6- +(A -1A
ervantes v. 7aIardo, ,26 +(A 131
R.A. 8,,2 ?%omestic Adoption )aw@
A./. 8o. A-B2BA-B+.. ?Aug. --, -AA-@


A. (e#uisites to be an adopter

,. Age and capacity re#uired P +ec. 3

-. 9usband and wife Iointly P +ec. 3

/ichelle )im, 5( ,2466-, /ay -,, -AA6

.. 8eed for consent P +ec. 6

)andingin vs. (!, 5.(. 8o. ,20604, Kune -3, -AA2

0. Aliens as adopters P +ec. 3 ?b@

(epublic v. Toledano, -.. +(A 6

(.A. 4A0., ;The )aw on InterBountry Adoption<
A./. 8o. A-B2BA-B+.. ?Aug. --, -AA-@

B. Who may not adopt, +ec. 3

. Who may be adopted, +ec. 4
52

%. Who may not be adopted

*. *ffect of death, +ec. ,.

7. !rocedure in adoption

(epublic Act 8o. 6-1., /arch ,-, -AA6 B A8 AT
(*OCI(I85 *(TI7IATI&8 &7 T9* %*!A(T/*8T &7 +&IA)
W*)7A(* A8% %*'*)&!/*8T ?%+W%@ T& %*)A(* A S9I)%
)*5A)): A'AI)AB)* 7&( A%&!TI&8S A+ A !(*(*OCI+IT* 7&(
A%&!TI&8 !(&**%I85+

5. *ffects of a decree of adoption

,. &n status, +ec. ,3
-. &n parental authority,

Tamargo v. A, -A6 +(A 1,4
ervantes v. 7aIardo, ,26 +(A 131
9aga1a" v" 9aga1a", G.R. No". 187308, Sept. 18, 2013


.. &n hereditary rights, +ec. ,4> 7 ,46B,6A> Art. .6, !% 2A.,
(ule 66, +ection 1
+ee: Balane, (uben, Jottng" n Succe""on, D-AA2 ed.E

0. &n name

In the /atter of Adoption of +tephanie 5arcia, 010
+(A 10,


9. (escission of adoption, +ec. ,6
)ahom vs. +ibulo, 5.(. 8o. ,0.646, Kuly ,0, -AA.
,. by the adopted
53
-. by the adopter/s
.. effects of rescission, +ec. -A


JII. +C!!&(T

A. What comprises support, 7 ,60

B. Who are obliged to provide support, 7 ,61, ,62

!elayo v. )auron, ,- !hil 01.
+anche$ v. Hulueta, 24 !hil ,,A
%e Asis vs. A, 5.(. 8o. ,-3134, 7eb. ,1, ,666
(ondina v !eople, 5( ,36A16, Kune ,., -A,-
5otardo v Buling, 5( ,21,22, August ,1, -A,-
!erla v Baring, 5( ,3-03,, 8ovember ,-, -A,-
alderon vs (o"as, 5.(. 8o. ,41161, Kan. A6, -A,.
)imB)ua v )ua, 5.(. 8os. ,31-36B4A, Kune A1, -A,.


. +ource of support, 7 ,63B,64, cf. 7 06, 3A, 60, ,-,, ,--

)erma v. A, 2, +(A 00A
(eyes vs InesB)uciano, 44 +(A 4A.

%. &rder of support, 7 ,66, -AA, -A0

/angonon vs. A, 5.(. 8o. ,-1A0,, Kune .A, -AA2
+pouses )im v )im, 5.(. 8o. ,2.-A6, &ctober .A, -AA6

*. /anner and time of payment, 7 -AAB-A0

alderon vs (o"as, 5.(. 8o. ,41161, Kan. A6, -A,.

F+ Amount of support, 7 -AAB-A4

)acson vs. )acson, 5.(.8o. ,1A200, August -4, -AA2


54
4+ (enunciation and Termination, 8 -A.1> 7 ,60> 8 ,1-
?read Tolentino@

;+ +upport pendente lte, 7 ,64> (ules of ourt, (ule 2,

I. !rocedure in applications for support, (ule 2,


JIII. !A(*8TA) ACT9&(IT: L C+T&%: &7 9I)%(*8


A. oncept of parental authority, Art. II, +ec. ,-, ,643 onstitution,
7 -A6, -,,, 8 .12B.2.

/edina vs. /akabali, -3 +(A 1A-, /arch -4, ,626
Cnson vs. 8avarro, ,A, +(A ,4., 8ovember ,3, ,64A
)abea" 0orpu" *+ 6nor S&ang 'o Vng"on v 0abcaban, <2'
No. 1%817, Januar1 13, 201%


B. Transfer of !A, 7 -,A cf. 7 --.B--0, 7 -.0, -,3

*slao vs A, -22 +(A .,3


. Who e"ercises !A, 7 -,,B-,. cf. 7 06, ,A-?2@, 0.?-@, 2.?-@,
,32. 06, ,A- ?2@, ,-6 ?6@

Cnson v. 8avarro ,A, +(A ,4.
*spiritu L )ayug v. A, 5.(. 8o. ,,120A ?,661@
+antos +r. v. .A., 5.(. 8o. ,,.A10 ?,661@
%avid vs. ourt of Appeals, -1A +(A 4-, 8ovember ,2, ,661
Tonog vs. A, .32 +(A 20-
Briones vs. /iguel, 5.(. 8o. ,12.0., &ctober ,4, -AA0
5ualberto vs. 5ualberto, 5.(. 8o. ,10660. Kune -4, -AA1
Grande v Antono, G.R. No. 2042%8, $ebruar1 18, 201%

%. +ubstitute !A, 7 -,0B-,2, 7 -,3, -..
(ep. Act 8o. ,A,21, 7oster are Act of -A,-.
55

'ancil vs Belmes, .14 +(A 3A3

*. +pecial !A

7 -,4B-,6, 7 -..
cf. 7 --, in rel. to 8 -,4A
ybercrime !revention Act, (A ,A,31, +eptember ,-, -A,-

+t. /aryNs Academy vs. arpitanos, 5.(. 8o. ,0..2.,
7ebruary 2, -AA-
hild )earning entre vs. Tagario, 5( ,1A6-A, 8&'. -1, -AA1
+chool of the 9oly +pirit vs. Taguiam, 5( ,21121, Kuly ,0,
-AA4
A#uinas +chool v Inton, 5( ,40-A-, Kanuary -2, -A,,


7. 7ilial privilege, 7 -,1

(& (ule ,.A +ec. -1 cf. +ecs. -- L -.
)ee v A, 5( ,3342,, Kuly ,., -A,A

5. *ffects of !A over the childNs person,

7 --AB---
7 --.B--0

uadra v. /onfort, .1 +(A ,2A
(.A. 32,A, The hild Abuse )aw

9. *ffects of !A over the childNs property,

7 --1B--3, (A 6-.,, +ecs. ,-BB and ,-B

9ebron vs. )oyola, 5.(. 8o. ,2462A, Kuly 1, -A,A
8eri v 9eirs, 5( ,60.22, &ctober ,A, -A,-


I. +uspension or termination of !A

55
,. permanent termination, 7 --4, -.-, cf. (A 24A6

-. nonBpermanent termination, 7 --6 cf. 7 ,6.

+ecs. ,2 and ,6, (A 411- re parental authority and revocation
of adoption


.. suspension of !A, 7 -.,B-.A, -..

hua v. abangbang, -3 +(A 36,
%e 5u$man vs !ere$, 062 +(A 030

0. revival

+ee: (.A. 4.26, ;An Act *stablishing 7amily ourts, 5ranting Them
*"clusive &riginal Kurisdiction &ver hild and 7amily ases.<

+ee: (.A. 32,A, ;hild Abuse Act<

JI'. */A8I!ATI&8

(A 24A6

A. ause of emancipation, 7 -.0 as amended

B. *ffect of emancipation, 7 -.2 as amended
cf. 7 ,1, 8 -,4A


J'. +C//A(: KC%IIA) !(&**%I85+ C8%*( 7

Arts. -.4B-1., ,AA?-@, ,-3?-@, 0,, 1,, 26, 3., 62, ,-0, -,3, --1

J'I A(* A8% *%CATI&8 &7 9I)%(*8

8 .12B.2.

J'II. +C(8A/*+

56
8 .20B.4A
(A 2A41 P regulating the use of aliases, August 0, ,626
(A 6-11, 7 ,32

)laneta v. Agrava, 13 +(A -6
Telmo v. (epublic, 3. +(A -6
Tolentino v. A, ,2- +(A 22
)egamia v. IA, ,., +(A 036
hange of 8ame, Wang, 5.(. 8o. ,16622./arch .A, -AA1
(emo v %7A, /arch 1, -A,A
5on$aludo v !eople, 5.(. 8o. ,1A6,A, 7ebruary 2, -AA2
%apar v. Biascan, 0.6 +(A ,36
L!"on v Gonzalez, GR 14220,, 6arc& 31, 201%


J'III. (C)*+ 5&'*(8I85 !*(+&8+ W9& A(* AB+*8T

8 .4,B.4., .40B.46, 7 62, ,A,, ,-0, 8 .6AB.62, 7 0,

(eyes v. AleIandro, ,0, +(A 21
*astern +hipping v. )ucero, ,-0 +(A 0-1
/anuel vs. !eople, 5.(. 8o. ,2140-, 8ov. -6, -AA1
!antollano v Gorphil, 5( ,26131, /arch .A, -A,,
Rep. v Granada, GR 187,12, June 13, 2012
Rep. v" Narceda, GR 1#2740, Aprl 10, 2013


JIJ. 7C8*(A)+

8 .A1B.,A, 7 ,61, ,60
*ugenio v. 'ele$, ,41 +(A 0-1
Valno v Adrano, GR 1828#%, Aprl 22, 201%



JJ. *8T(I*+ I8 T9* I'I) (*5I+T*(

8 0A3B0,.
(&, (ule ,A4
(A 6A04, as amended by (A ,A,3-
57

Barretto vs )ocal ivil (egistrar, 30 +(A -13
(epublic v 'alencia, 5( )B.-,4,, /arch 1, ,642
(epublic v. /arcos, ,4- +(A --.
)abayoB(owe v. (epublic, ,24 +(A -60
Hapanta v. (egistrar, -.3 +(A -1v
)eonor v. ourt of Appeals, -12 +(A 26
+ilverio vs. (!, 5.(. 8o. ,30246, &ctober --, -AA3
(ep. vs. agandahan, , 5.(. 8o. ,22232, +ept. ,-,
-AA4
%ela ru$ v 5racia, 5.(. 8o. ,333-4, Kuly .,, -AA6
Bra$a v The (egistrar, 5.(. 8o. ,4,,30, %ecember 0, -AA6
Baldos vs. A, 5.(. 8o. ,3A201, Kuly 6, -A,A
(epublic v /agpayo, 5( ,46032, 7eb. -, -A,,
(epublic v +agun, 5.(. 8o. ,43123, 7ebruary ,1, -A,-
Cnited lan v +abellano, 5( ,423--, Kune ,4, -A,-
(epublic v Cy, 5( ,64A,A, Aug. ,-, -A,.
Iwasawa vs 5angan, , 5.(. 8o. -A0,26, +*! ,, -A,.
Republc v *la1bar, G.R. No. 18#,38, $ebruar1 10, 201%