l*,1

o
ParoleEoard'roilirr,ondes
librations
of Canada conditionnelles du Canada
Chairperson Prdsident
410 lulr Avenue West
Ottasa, ON K1A oRl
Document Released Under the Access to
H:lll'l: i:j i"".:'J ffiillH :ii P;
"
e n ve rt u
MCU PS I UCM SP
Received / Regu
M""- 0 1 2013
APR 2 { 2013
The,Honourable Vic Toews, P.C., Q.C., M.P.
Minister of Public Safety
269
Laurier
Avenge West
Ottawa, OntarioKlAOPS
Re: Parofe Boatd of Ganada video for victims
Dear Minister,
1fi5 my pleasure to present to you a new information video for victims, Parote Board of
Canada: Victim Services.
Available on-line, the video informs viCtims of the options they have at the Board. lt
shows how a hearing works and directs victims to other Boarcl information, such as our
website and toll-free victim information line.
At the FBC, we believe Victims should, if they choose, have a role in the conditional
release process, including the right to attend and
present a statement at a parole
hearing as now enshrined in law. We believe victims have the right to information, and
under the Corrections and Conditional Release Acf, the Board routinely shares
information about offenders with registered victims that Would othenvise be protected
under the Privacy Act.
Sec. $erv. PSlSsrv, Soc, SP
Recelvcd / Regut
ei'.J 01 2013
C;anadH
A-2013-00021
1.
Document Released Under the Access to
_2.
Him:li:jj3:?ffiil1fl:iiy":"
en verru
This stan-oe of openness and transparency suppprts our public safety mandate. This is
why we continue to reach out to vietirn organizalions and to work with the Conectional
SeMce of Canada to streamline victim information services.
I hope and trust you
willfind this video a useful addition to the Pubtig S-afety
portfolio
suite of communimtigns products
for victims.
Harvey Cenalko
Chairperson, Parole Board of Canada
cc. Andrew House, Chief of Staff
Encl.
Gnadfr
l*l 9ru:ni:^' ffu:lm*O
To
A
The Honourable Vic Toews, P.C., M.P.
Minister of Public Safety
Chairperson
Parole Board of Canada
the contents of this report at your convenience.
c,c.: Shawn Tupper, Assistant Deputy Minister of Public Safety
Document Released Under ihe Access to
MEMoffi ;H?l ft#'HHH$6!s;
o en ve1 u
slcurity Glassmcation - Classiftcation de s6cudt6
uN cLess; a'D
f,ur File - Notre r6f6rence
3-or3-o{
93o
YOUr Frle ' VOre reterenco
)a'e
sil
06.?015
eJ;.*,
Flla No,
cf,fia,s
o
T
I
L
T
From
De
I
I
_l
I
-J
_l
J
Sublect
Objet
Monthlv-'lDashboard" ort Recbrd
QHspEnsion.Ooerations
and Deciqions,and Backloo
As requested, please find attached the Monthly Dashboard report on Record Suspension
for fiscaf 2013-14. lncluded with this reporting is a separate "Dashboard" progress on
decision making in relation to the backlog.
The record suspension report covens.the first month of the new tiscal year. During that
period the PBC has received 1,643 applications and accepted,.8O1 with no decisions made.
The PBC still has 5,861 applications in process from the preVious year with 959 with a
Board member foi decision
As for the backlog, there remains 20,657 active files with 77A wfth Board members for:
decision.
r::5J:sm
Mi"'
0 0 2013
I am available to further
B=F
$=P
rJ
=
s
gd
u,0 3
rJ
1t#
P:i-o
X
\-O)
E'F
g
$,H
b
-:J:l
*'g I
]i FF-1
3
+3
E5
CI
ssF
(D'
ni
g8
CI
;l
lrs
iN
l6
c.
rb
f)
w
e
&
<
E
s
('!
&
F
:s.
hI
&
{/,J
Ow's
q
+fr"
ec H-S
liE
t+
Irr
lo-
F
is
ls
lral
l%
le
1f;.
tp.
lsi
li
iEl
l*i
lHi
lh|l
,rad I
a
s)
a
,\: o
:: +
)* u
:;i
1
<l)
s,
a
g
6
&
o
-il
.,t
.A
EI
,,;) 2
C9, d
'ql 4
0a
B}
:
vr
*
lil
cr
""1
ro
v1
\
.N fi
s8
.o
F*
)Pe
I
I
iifs
;i
Fs
.r.{o
)i r.q
,AF
!,
;s a s
bLj
!
iE
;q.
$d
E'3
ar 9L
^t'-
/
n@ 6
FA Bri
iq
'5S Ys !:Yf
oH
d
*
xo
o
u; J

* f
S34 trA!
sF; +61
5 x u *F R
5;f si3
E4; ;bS
);a65:3iu
i.s.s fr s x
l$
a
a
E
l?p:,$ns
R:d- HR
i:
tS'
!E Cl
n
ilq
E
a'
n
F
o
o
<t
e
5
,l' ,/
/'/
,/t
l2{
*9 d&s i'l
$i
i
g.* $f'g
{t,,; ,
e.
E:
fr:Zi
::.4:
ro
o
o
o
o
grigg$g
4' a5
"g
'fr
r"'7,
'F
.HH $
* 5 $
#HHft:B
g*'fi{[fi
$$EgfE
#'89"$ *"8
q
s,.{
g
Fd
m
F't
AI
rs
.aJ
4t
gl
':..;l
L;
''J3
if
rhl
g
.g
IB
"c
a
{J
&.
'B
t-
=
e
fr)
g
ff: f
{A
fi}
fl)
.tr)
11 a.
!f*
Y ffiX
<lu
J -+.r
E}Fffi
f". '-*
:i:T)
h
i*+r k
G)
r -lJ
-ffiffc
r,*
)* P-^
;{
,$
Xt^
r{1 v
ffi
n'$i
fs-- X
_Qx 6
s,ts-
r/
*{'
!-
|i&-1
e.g
v)
g6I
f- r- *)
:?f$
!l o-
JJF
O
{lL'x
LEJ E L,'
ti
q,
F
$
q{
tu
F
tu
rt
B
ic
U
ls
EJ
.*
$J
a
qr,,
Sr'
q
o
rJ
Sl
1;
$
Q'
p
8e
s
^,
rD
ce
r
v
s
a
s
g
qJ
o
B
ie
s,
F
.fI
r{
E
E
*
p
#
g
b
l&
E
,$.
I
e
d
B
u
b
Ti

e
s
F
|t
3
:::'::':::ii
'!
,,i
r:1
!r :::
6t{
> :::
gs
ne
.p'
ii?
ra
F3
o,
6*,
1
\
\
?i
dx
E.:
uo
0
E,g
c
^=:c
?f iirt
E1U.
!E
i
S,F
?i
:25
46
fo
I
o
I
z
b
q.l
rq
I
f4
r"l
8\i
a
@
.p
t;
ffi
l'rt
aa Itl:
R*i
-a^
FL
q
*
a
t5
s.-
&3
d
rN
3
rfi
s
fn
.'l
?g
r.l
0.
1{
3
,J)
U
IU
a
#
IE
=
rL
L
l&
s
rv
('l
!"{
e
nl
4r
Q
;r
w
m!
?u
trJ
4l
ffi**um*r:t ffisl**sse{ Ur""le*sn th* Aee*ss to
0nf*rn"rmti*n A*t 1 ffi*curvrsr:t divulgu* en vsrtu
, ,
Pardons Granted Pardons Denied Suspensions Orderedl Suspensions Refused
2013-08-01 35 1. z z
2013-08-02 19
I
6 0
2013-08-03 0 0 b 0
20r3-08-04 0 0 2 0
2013-08-05 0
n
38 1
2013-08-06 43 1" 80 3
2013-08-07 83 2 68 3
20r3-08-08 L25 I 39 5
2013-08-09 12 3 93 3
2013-08-10 L 0
q
0
2013-08-11 1
n
LC 0
2013-08-12 59 1 46
?
201,3-08-13 78 3 52 z
20t3-08-14 76
1
33
4
2013-08-15 41. 2 1.3 3
2013-08-16 39 2 2A
4
I
2013-08-17 0 L 0
2013-08-18 1
at
10
n
2013-08-19 33 I 49 0
2013-08-20 L8 L 27
2013-08-21 17
tl 4 1.
2013-08-22
)A
2 26 4
2013-08-23 28 4 18 1
2At3-08-24 2 0 z o
2013-08-25 17 0 5 0
2013-08-26 1.08 5 57 z
2013-08-27 94 5 35 6
2013-08-28 1 1.3 55 4
20r3-08-29 1.O7
1
33 1.2
2013-08-30 0 I 1,2 0
2013-08-31 0 0 0 0
Total: L177 45 851 55
A-2013-00024
00001
Document
Releaised
Under
Information
Act / Document
the
Access
divulgue
en
to
vertu
egeds d l'i
Pardons
Granted Pardons
Denied
Suspensions
Ordened Suqnpncinnc Qaf,..^,r
20t.3-09{1
r
0
1
2013-09-02
22 n
8
2013-09-03
1.80 I
38
2013-09-04
93
75
al
2013-09-0s
88
71
5 2|)1 ?-no-nc
84
I
5
.rrtJ-w-ul
18 n
2
fi
2013-09-08
1.8
1
18
rl
2C)l3-09-09
L34
35 1
zcr13-09-10
93
30
0 Tnrl t-nq-
5
9
1
Au.r'-wt-.lz
t6
l-
3
z
2013-09-13
9C
1
3(
2013-09-14
U o
2013-09-1s n
0
c
U
20:13-09-16
50 1
4
3
20r3-09-17
23
5
38
4
18
5
39
1
2013-09-19
29
15
3
2oJr3-09-20
47
0
17
201t3-09-21
z/ 'J.
t
0
207.3-09-22
48 o
o
n
zo73-09-23
61
6
27
2073-A9-24
47
85 q
2013-09-25
6R
I
118
2013-09-26
1
36
5
^ s
zms-49-27
5L 1
70
L
2013-09-28
28
31
201:3-09-29
23 n
47
201:]-09-30
67 I
46
Total:
1518
59
3
1048
71
00002
t**umsnt ffi.els*sed
Lindsn
Enf*rrnati*n Act 1 ilaeument
th* Aec*ss to
divulgu* en vertu
2
Pardons Granted Pardons Denied Suspensions Ordered Suspensions Refused
201:3-l.O-01 20 4 51 2
201:3-:t0-02 27 L 33 5
201,3-10-03 31 1 54 7
2013-10-04 54 3 39 11
20x:3-t0-05 28
n 17 0
201:3-:10-06 6
I
16 0
201,3-:10{7 54 3 83 4
201:3-:10-08 32 I 39 2
201:3-;1,0-09 23 U 28
R
201:3-10-10 27 L 55 4
201it-:t 0-11 27 1 25 5
20113-:10-12 l" U 3 0
20Lil-:to-13
n n
0 0
201:3-:[0-14 15 3 30 0
201:3-r0-15 25
1
r 29 3
201:3-10-16 21 0 43
'l
20I'"J-:LO-77 21 2 34 3
201:3-:10-18 44 5 23 0
201:3-10-19 22 2 18 o
201:3-10-20 0 0 I 0
207ir-1.0-21 32 z 40 5
207:r-:lo-22 29 6 28
201:]-r0-23 34 3 39 5
201:3-10-24 3.3 0 L9 1
201:'-:Lo-25 2 0 30 1.
201:l-:t0-26 26 5 29 2
20tit-1"o-27 3 0 24 3
201:l-L0-28 L9 1 22 5
201:l-10-29 24 7 37 5
201,1-I0-30 18 3 54 3
201:]-10-31 48 4 27 5
Total r 726 60 978 102
00003
Document
Released
Under
f nformation
Act / Document
the Access
divulgue
en
to
vertu
l'infnrmqtinrr A
Pardons
Granted Pardons
Denied Suspensions
Ordered Susoensionr Rofircorf
:10:13-11-01
6
5
so
2
210::13-tt-02
15
,|
13
1
2r013-11-03
10
2C
1,
20n3-11-04
37
50
2
2013-11-05
61
3s
5
20t.3-11-06
17
.l
f
35
1
2013-17-07
8
4
24
I
,L
2013-11-08 o
L
10
2r013-1149
33
c
0
0
2t013-11-10 c
1
L2
U
2013-11-11
10
3
0 1.
2013-11-12
17
l-
23
.t
J.
2013-11-13
2T
1
L
9
.L
2013-11-14
23
20
:I
201:'-11-15
r.8
L
3
.',
201:t-11.16
J
20
I
z0t1.at-Lt-77
0
32
20tt3-11-tt
29
2
34
:t
20r13-11-19
22
1
23
.,
20r13-11-20
21
1
22
2013-11-21
38
3
54
2013-11-22
50
1
32
2073-tt-23
30
1
8
20L3-tt-24
32
0
o
{
2013-11-25
?8
5
50
20.13-7t-26
B
1
17
20'.13-17-27
4J
5
31
20:1.3-11-28
22
L
52
J
2013-11-29
z
1.
2s
L
20:13-11-30
9
0
18
1
Total:
643
49
"t28
59
00004
Dncument
ffi.slsms*d
{"-f nd*n ths Aeeess
t*
lnfnrrxati*n
A*t / il**urnsnt
divulgue err vertu
5s m l'lnfcnrnati $ & l'tRt0rmatt0n.
Pardons Granted Pardons Denied Suspensions Ordered Suspensions Refused
2013-1.2-01 14
n
22 1"
20rit-72-02 25 0 24
a
L
2013-12-03 3 1 33 )
20tit-L2-o4 17 J 13 4
z0tit-72-o5 T9 4 18 4
2013-12-06 54 2 5 2
20t21-72-O7 24
n
19 3
2013-1.2-08 2C U 12 0
2013-1.2-09 31 3
-f
z
201it-L2-!0 1 4
o
2
2074t-7.2-LL LC 20 L3 7
z0Lrl-7.2-LZ 1.4 15 0
20Lit-L2-13 C L 0
zal:rt-12-t4 13 3 13 0
201:r-1.2-1s 6 3
n
0
20L3a-1.2-L6 42 8 74 12
20t2t-7.2-77 35 2 28
zal:rt-1.2-L8 7L 3 1-L
a
I
201:t-12-79 23 z 2t 1
20t2t-t2-20 30 z d f,
20t3t-12-21 19 c 5 t,
20L3r-L2-22 b
1
L 6 0
2073t-12-23 15 3 4
20t3rt2-24 4 L 22 2
20t3t-72-25
n
L2 0
2At3-\2-26 17 f 4
2073t-L2-27 1.1 3 20 3
2073t-L2-28 7 1 T
20L3t-12-29 0 U 20 2
2073t-t2-30 t5 2 37 7
20t3rl2-37
1n
2 18 t
Total: 504 83
tl40
86
00005
***umsnt
Rmlsms*d Un"ldsn the Aecss$
8r:f*nnr*ti*n
Act 1 ilSccummnt
divulgue
en
dm lm {-*i sun l'aneeis a l'infcrryaAti$Atrz
trr
vsrtu
Parole Board of Canada
Performance
Measurement
lmportant Notice: The above outcome rates provide
information on the performance
of offenders on
conditional release from the
gtart-of the. supervision peiiou.
unlii tn"
"no
of the period
of supervision,
The
statistics refer to supervision Perlods (;rot tho * br oneno-eofJn""
arn offender may have more
than one supervisions perlods.
[ti?tftff";:5,:t3lifi:
onlv those offenders serying determinat sntences, as offsnders servins indorrminate
senrences
p q6
8.o*
ii,=>
<6
o
o
u
o
o
z
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
J
o
o
o
o
o
o
(n
o
d
o
;
o
o
o
;
o
c
o
c
o
o
z
o
o
o
o
o
f.
o
o
o
o
o
u
o
o
e.
o
N
P
tr&
l:iJ
li$
f*
l$
Is?
h$
r#
;*
,ffi
o
o
0
o
o
(O
',2
o
o
9r
o
o
o
o
c
o
o
5
o
o
OJ
o
c
o
o
o
o
(n
o
o
;
o
o
o
=
o
o
q
o
o
o
z
o
gl
o
o
o
q,
6
o
o
o
= n
o
o
6
o
N
N
@
N
O o
@
A
q
I
:
O o
o
N u
o
ts
u)
o
w
N \
u
@
!
J-
C'l
T
o
N ()
5
O)
m
N 5
q
u 5
{
!
ol o
o
o
$
cll
u
J\,
O)
o
@ o ! !
e
!
r
o
5 c)
@
q
A
F
!
u o
N
@
('r
@ (r
j-
N
@ {
J-
P
.F
o
o
N
@
N
o
u
s
\
o
\
N
o
N
! F
N
N
bo
N
n
N (n
u N
q
00
\
N
i!
N
;-
N
Ol
0
O)
o
(D
3
o
N
@
h
ol
!
! N
q
!
o
@ N
o
o
Ol
N
N
F
(o
c)
5
@
!
u
(o
@
o
o
o
3
o O
o
o
b
o
j-
{
z
J
o
O)
A
Ol
u
Or N
@
a
N
o
o
o
s
q
@
!
\t ts
u
{
o
o
o
o
3
o
\
q
ts
NJ
qJ
(p
N
Vl
9o
qJ
00
so
H
(o
(o
{s
\
{
N
o
P
a
A
qJ
b
Ur
qJ
l\r
lil
ro
6
t\l
lo
A
i\
.9t
\
a
\
-
o
5
N
9!
tso
!o
o)H
o
a-
+f
rio
5:
xo
oa If
:o
j6
o3
fg
OJ
ao
oo
!-
o<
3-i
Ro
t.o
<o
of,
E.e
5o
=;' 5di
o
ii.
=.o
oo
;z'
;o
=.s
3
-f
o@
<=t
oa ro
,^o
;<
o^-
=5
ar
is"
i'-
='H
YN
'40
on
{t.
OF
IO
:o
>E
oo
6'e
9-
o
c
3
o
+
=
o
o
o
a
N
t^
c
o
E
o
N
o
N
r{
m
-c
(J
L
o
o
P
o.
5
o
o
o
N
I
:
:,
i
6
|...
LN
ro
C\l
:1,,:
:"ii
1|:
$i
; i,ia
: i.:i
:':,
:ik
!il
iii
:,
".
iri
o
m
f-
(o
f.)
m
N
(o
H
N
(n
j;irl
: l'i:
tl:t!!
il:i
iiil
ii'
lii'
i.lii
)1:tl
::
1.,
(o
O
s
llr
I
lrii
li]l
m
F\
N
I
o
m
m
r
$
N
:
Ln
01
N
Cll
F
n
(\
r
N
cn
@
O
o
N
an
m
O)
N
rn
\o
m
(o
m
r
(o
N
m
s
:,
(o
(o
F.-
r
N
r
o
Ol
N
T\
<f
(n
rl
m
\o
s
d
m
d
.f
(o
6
lo
N
d
r
rn
d
o o r
l-.
si
rn
N
N
r
N
6
o)
m
m
$
J
o
i
m
o
<t
N
n
00
N
r
Ol
N
(o
N d
c'r
oo
N
n
ln
m
(o
v
Or
m
G
6
Ln
N
N
t\
r
q N
N
n
ol
n
N
(o m
Ot
F-.
g
(o
N
N
|...
o)
n
O)
N
co
I
v
N
s
d
N
Ot
F-
N
$
N
N
F-
N
s
J
N
s
r
N
Ol
Ol
m
l-.
N
m
d
a
0,
r
Ln
('r
n
o
(o
00
<t
N o
N n N
st
N
+
+
F\
F\
N
$
o
n
c')
F-
6
m
N
F
m
N
F-
d
@
$
@
N
Ol
Or
o
F\
rn
N
N
d
cn
r
+
;
N
N
N
ro
ro
<i'
N
m
E
o
z
m
q
N
(\

n
m
s
cn o
f)
Ol
Cll
d
F- N
(o
<f
F-
ol
d
ln
N
r
\0 N
m
N
F\
<i'
N
N
m
N
N
N
o
m
o)
m
N
N
N
N
n
N
F-
J
n
Ol
N
n
(\
J
n
(o
N
6
F\
o
N
@
N
N
'q
('l
r
s
n
o
d
o
N
@
r
N
@
m
@
n
m
o
N
N
N
N
N
o
m
m
o1
N
Ol
r)
H
n
ol
N
crr
N
N
o
N
N
N
tri
(o
N
m
N
@
r
r
ol
o
N
N
o
Ol N
N
crt
o
m
o,
ll
E
OJ
o
Ol
d
rf
ro
t\
@
r
cn
s
N
N
n
d
N
N
r
<t
sl
n
s
m
N
m
d
F
r
r
oo
*
o
('l
o
N
N
m
n
r
r
N
N
s
N
r
o
I
(o
N
$
O)
O)
O
o
N
o
c{
@
d
(O
N
@
o r
m
N
o
E
o
L
E
o
P
o
o
IJ
I
(!
!
e
|It
'o
o
F-.
m
(o
d
in
i:o
!d
,d
d
rn
m
sf
co
d
O o)
LN
N
<t
N
m
cn
<t
d
rn
n
N
(o
\t
v
n
N
N
n
r
o
d
m
N
m
r
@
m
oo
N
N
Ol
N
@
f-
$
N
N
(rl
@
s
@
N
@
N
o
N
cf)
$
N
N
n
d
a')
<f
n
1ia)
!!o
,3
v
n
(o
co
c'l
N
m
N
$
o
6
<f
N
m
N
F-
o
F.
oo
00
r..
q
Ot
LN
@
m
rn
O
N
o
N
(o
<t
N
fn
to
d
l-.
6
00
N
c\
t
d
c{
6
@
N
N
(\
N
F.
d
(o
N
<t
N
s
o
N
$
N
]O
Clr
n
N
N m
d
r
n
d
N
c{
(o
m
o
d
N
r
o
n
N
o
oo
n
n
$
N
m
N
ol
d
N
@
O
N
o
m
n
d
N
r
6
cn
n
N
o
N
6
@
m
m
s
N
Ol
o
6
(o
o
m
N
o
m
@
o
rJ
o
u
:
il
o
.9
o.
o-
N
n
(o
tr
o
N
(o
rn
v
(O
N
cn
c|l
<i
cfl
6 n
r
n
lo
n
ln
c'r
n
N
N
N
\r
Ln
(o
Ol
N
m
N
N
<r
d
l--
N
r
6
N
@
Ol
00
N
Ln
N N
r
N
N
n
N
$
N
o
c\l
N
@
O)
$
m
N
(O
J
r0
O)
<f,
+
n
Ol
f"
d
(o
6 o
(o
N
m
n
N
Ln
N
c|l
co
<f,
N
co
n
cn
n
N
o
O
co
r
N
N
N
m
@
ro
g
o
l-r
m
N
6
co
N
n
Or
O
g
ro
m
N
v
<t
N
q
r|
N
(o
N
$
n
N
N
0
.O
0
d
o
O
o
@
N
N
Fl
N
16
o
'o
o
E
!
C]
o
o
(n
o
N
N
o
o
N
o
O
o
G
o
o
o
a
sl
N
m
N
o
'6
o
o
E.
o
o
o
o
6
o
N
s
o
N
o
o
@
E
0)
o
o
o
(o
o
o
N
ln
o
N
'o
O
o
o
t
-o
o
o
o
r
o
N
(o
N
CJ
O
o
d
OJ
o
@ o
o
N
r-
o
o
N
E
O
0
0
E
E
o
o
o
ol
o
FI
@
N
o
'O
o
G
0
o
O
o
o
.{
N
q)
N

o
'oJ
o
E
a
@
o
o
N
o
d
o
N
E
o
o
o
t
o
o
*
N
d
o
N
i
N
ql
'0
a
O
G
0
o
o
;F.
QO
:P6
56 E
.q.xr
-91:6
F66
96 0
r:6
o; o
3
ai
B
B
9J
t
':
I
a
s
!
a)
5
I
AJ
Bt
o
a)
3
.t
.a
;r
oo
.so
HO
.9
q,+
l:F
Ja
oq{
3
OJ
t:
a.)
--
!
o
-
SJ
a)
.n
N
ftl
q
I
tr
o
*
l!
ltu
lcL
lo
l5
lvr
lo
l-
OJ
5
CL
0
o
5
o
CL
a
o
:J
J
T'
:.
ts
N
o
o
o
c
lC
o
OJ
at
(l,t
!'
N
c)
ts
A
ET
:J
s9l
q!d
iD og
*E S
a.q;
od
a@
<6
o
(D
c)
li
It
ll
l(
IF
T
(D
o
N
Fr
c)
N'
ts
o
o
f,
o
o-
C)
o
:J
t9
o
(o
N
o
ts
o
o
J
o'
6)
o
f,
TW
o
6
N
o
(o
o
:.
(D
6)
o
N
o
o
N
o
o
@
o
o
f.
rD
6)
D
5
o
N
o
o
v
0
(D
f,
6'
6}
o
J
N
o
o
(,
o
o!
rD
f
rD
N
o
o
5
N
o
gr
o
rD
f,
6'
6)
o
f
N
o
o
q,
N
o
o
5
I
o
J
rD
o
o
o
J
N
o
o
lv
N
o
q,
o
o
f
6
6)
o
J
N
o
o
ts
N
o
19
I
o
J
.D
o_
o
o
f
N
o
19
o
F
N
5
N
(! (o
5 N
o
N
ts
Ot 5 \
A F
\
LN
!
lv
UJ
w
o
u
I
[,
J.
A
(rr
ts
s
5
Ol
!
O)
f.
(rl
N
UJ
c!
ts
!
F
(o
N
(o
FJ
u 5
P
(D
UJ 5
C^J
@
N Ltl
NJ
ts
5
(o
(rl
P
NJ
5
(!
(!
(J
F
N
ts
(/l
N
N
0,
3
o
ts
ts
-J
w
::
N
a 5
Ol
Ol ol
(D
ol F
N
! ql
ro
F
N
5
!
N
NJ
NJ
P
Ol
N
(o
l.J
s
(o
N cll ul
N
N
In
5
o
P
!
N
!
N)
(l)
N
! 5
!
N)
oo 5
{
F
qJ
NJ
gJ
(tl
w
:ilr
i:itl
UJ
ts
N
F
(r)
LN
5
NJ ts
(!
5
Ol
s
(p
5 UJ
e
F
5
F
ts
H
\
ts
A
a
P N
A
1..)
(,
\
(!
N
-J
5
(o
F
LN
Ol
P
5
L!
@ H
5
('l
(o (o
F
O)
a
\
P
-J
(o
O)
F
5
C!
F
NJ
Or
N
NJ
Nr
c,
(o
(/l
F
Oi
!
A
\
@
N
w
(n
5
F
(^)
{
l'i!,
'::,
P
ts
ol
P
Ol
UJ
(tl
rl
P
ts
!
@
P
(n
P
NJ
m
P
(l)
5
N
N
w
L^)
!
!
(rl
o
3
N
('o
-F
l.J
\
;ii
irl
(D
NJ
s (!
5
co
(,
@
(o
NJ
\j
F
\
{
! 5
ts
(,
!
1i
t:i
il:
1,:
li:,
,!1
ilr,
a
{
-J
o)
lfl
,. ,tl
:li
r:l
iij
,:l
ri :
:,1
;'"l
i{i: lll
fiil
i.
lL
iil
19
N
F
(n
P
5
ru1
!
u
N
A
N
{
Ol
A
n
o
ID
NJ
C'l
or
NJ
p
5
U
NJ
NJ
LN
!
H
5
oo
5
F
{
(n (tl
F
LN
{
ts
UJ
(.n
UJ
P
5
NJ
N)
(.!
o) U
'l
rl
,l
I
I
:l
.:"1
:l
,,I
r.l
..,, 1
: r,l
',1-
]:|
:l
l_
.l
,|]
,l
,:,1
,,1
i'l
,
tl
H
Ol
A
iz
rf
o
:l
ts
NJ
F
U
}J
(tl
N
s UJ
UJ
NJ
(o
5
P
N
@
NJ
(n
!
N
(!
(n
! u
NJ
@
iil
)t)
Ll
;ii
P
NJ
(,
(!
!
UJ
UJ
L!
N
(!
ul u
5
F
ol
\
(o
c'l
O)
O)
(J
o
a1
o
:J
o
T!
A
s 5
\
\
UJ
P
NJ
\j (n
NJ
A
w
F
NJ
!
ts 5
uj O)
m
(n
N.)
ts
A
NJ ! NJ
(n
(o
N
5
a
\
;l
,A (lJ
\
P
N
ol
!
tn
I
(tl
UJ
Ot
ul
P
F
o
N) oo
ts
(n
oo
UJ
p
@
!
,5 (/l
U UJ
NJ
F
rU
F.J 5
w
rn
n)
c:
:t
(t) @
l.J
ql
N
t,
ll
ts
gl
I
I
l
(rl
(D
NJ
TU
w
(!
5
!
s
@
NJ
N
oo
5
I
'l
rl
,l NJ
P D
)o
qJ
\.| 5 5
ts
!
(o
@
't:
t!
l(
l'
3i
gl
(1l
-tr
t\,
t\)
(^l
{p
lr
F
lh
th
5
rv
N)
av
5
ts
gJ
A ljr
t^t
r.l,
ol
N
6
l.i
o
F
6
A
(t
F
o
w
5
s
\,1
l l:I
i'l
It.l
'il
.l
F
o
co
(rJ
(J'l
N
:[-
1r
N
UJ
U1
N
5
P
o
ts
(rl
ur F.
@
P
5
5
N
N
T\,
ts
('1
Or
{ ul
t9
ts
5
N
F
gJ
J
6
o
o
N
ol
o
ol
o
o
B6
P.E
;90
o <t
bE-9
P P.g
!5o
F
q
3E*
A'A,':,--oooI(>
n.*H 3i6"Jifff'
Snfnnnt*ti*n A** 1 il3m*ument
3ffiillffi"?d'$ffi:Em
Loi sur l'aeees
ISISUE :!!; REGORD SUSPENSION PROCESS
qA9KGBoUNq
o The Criminat Records Act (CRA) gives the Board exclusive
jurisdiction and absolute
discretion to order, refuse to order and to deny a record suspension for offences
under a FederalAct or Regulation. .
o The CRA was tast amended in March 2)12.lt establishesi new eligibitity
periods:
renders some individuals inadmissible for a record suspension; and, requires the
l]oard to present a report to the Minister three months after the end of each fiscal
yearwhich is to be tabled in Parliament no later than December of that same year.
.
Persons applying for a record suspension must now wait 5 years for a conviction of
a summary offence and 10 years for a conviction of an indictable offence.
r lndividuals convicted of more than three offences tried by indictment and for which a
sentence of imprisonment of two years or more was imposed are not admissible to
apply for a record suspension.
.
lndividuals convicted of an offence listed in $chedule 1 of the CRA are also
inadmissible to apply for a record suspension. However, an individual can apply if
he or she can satisff the Board that he or she was not in a position of trust towards
the victim of the offence and the victim was not in a relationship of dependency with
him or her: that he or she did not use, threaten to use or attempt to use violence,
intimidation or coercion in relation to the victim; and that he or she was less than five
years older than the victim.
.
As well, the Board shall, within three months after the end of each fiscalyear, submit
to the Minister a report for that year containing the number of applications made; the
number of decisions made by the Board; the number of record suspensions ordered,
categorized by the offence to which they relate and, if applicable, the province of
rcsidence of the applicant; and any other information rqruips6 by the Minister'
RI
.
ln assessing a record suspension request for a summary or indictable conviction, the
Board confiims that the application is eligible as
per criteria set out in the CRA. This
includes ensuring that the compulsory waiting
period has been completed and that
the sentence has been satisfied. Satisfaction of sentence includes imprisonment,
parole, statutory release, and periods of probation orders. lt also includes payrnents
of allfines including surcharges and victim surcharges as well as restitution and
compensation orders.
en vgffiij
00001
divul
June, 2413
Information Act / Document divulgu6 en vertu
de la Li sur I'acces A l'information.
'The
Board conducts inquiries and investigations through a multitude of open and
$ecure databases to corroborate facts and obtain any otherr relevant information
iabout the applicant. An interview of the applicant is often conducted. Partnerships
'with
the different criminatljustice participants enables the Eloard to conduct
'verifications
and investigations on the applicants' criminal activities, history and other
lbehaviours to ensure that the applicant has been, and is still, of good
conduct and
roonsequently
meritorious of the record suspension. This allso includes assessing
information, documents and sources from abroad when applicable.
lFor the purpose of the CRA, good
conduct is defined in policy as behaviour that is
r:onsistent with, and demonstrates, a lawabiding life-style. The PBC may order or
rcfuse to order a record suspension based on the information received from law
enforcement agencies and all other criminaljustice participants regarding suspected
or alleged criminal behaviour by the applicant. This information is used by the Board
when rendering a decision.
In the case of a conviction for an indictable offence, the Board must take into
consideration additional information, The Board must be satisfied that the applicant
has demonstrated that obtaining a record suspension would provide
a measurable
benefit and sustain their rehabilitation in society. When considering ordering a
record suspension for these offences, the Board may take into account specific
factors ensuring that the:decision does not bring the administration of
justice
into
disrepute.
f n fiscaf 2012-2013 the Board has received in excess of 19, 500 applications and
has accepted more than 1 1,500. Generally, these applicants would have received
non-custodial and
provincial
sentences (fines, probation). To date, of the
appfications accepted 49o/o ila for offences tried by indictment and 510/o arefor
those tried summarily. The former are investigated for concluct and are assessed for
rneasurable benefit, sustained rehabilitation, and the administration of
justice
and its
possible disrepute. Allfiles are voted on by at least one Board member, however,
files relating to a conviction for a sexualoffence must receive consensus by two
Eloard members in order for a pardon
to be granted (these files account for less than
1o/o oI the overall volume). Additional inquires with local police
detachments are also
c,onducted for these cases.
11'the Board proposes
to refuse to order a record suspension, it will notify the
applicant in writing as resuired by statute and advise him/her of the right to make
rr:presentations that they believe are relevant, either in writiing or verbally at a
hearing if authorized by the Board. Before making its final decision to order or refuse
ttl order a record suspension, the Board will consider any nrpresentation made by
the applicant within a reasonable time (60 days).
June.2013
00002
-.-IIl
$a'rfmrnratinn A*t / ffi'n*um*r-lt divulgu* eR vsrtu
d* lm [-*i sur l'sr**s lh l'infcnrnatl*n.
. Wnen a recoid suspension is ordered, the Board will notity RCMP Criminal Real
I'ime ldentification Services, They willsequester allsuspended convictions frorn the
Canadian Police Information Centre
(CPIC) and in turn, will notify the arresting
police force of the record suspension as well as all RCMP detachments. In
addition, the Board will notify the applicant, the court whene the case was heard and
all other
justice partners who were involved in the
procesri, that a record suspension
has been ordered and request that the file be kept separate and apart'
e F:ederal agencies/departments that have records of convictions must keep those
records separate once the record suspension has been ordered. They may not
clisclose the information without the permission of the Minister of Public Safety.
Although this applies only to federal records, most
provinr:ial and municipal agencies
restrict access to their records once notified by the Board'
r l-he Minister of Public Safety, before granting disclosure, shall be satisfied that the
disclosure is in the interests of the administration of
justic,e
or the safety/security of
Oanada or any state allied or associated with Canada. Relquest for disclosure are
made to the RCMP who then submits the request to the Department. Most requests
are tabled by Crown Counsel for sentencing
purposes.
.
'}'he
Criminal Records Regulations
(CRR) and the CRA require that a notation be
rnade in CPIC to indicate that a sequestered record exists for a sexual offence listed
in Schedule2 of the Act. This information is only made accessible upon request to
police or other authorized body where an individual's criminal record may be
clisclosed only if that person seeks employment to work or volunteer with vulnerable
persons
and has given written consent
prior to the existence of a record being
verified or disclosed.
BITVOCATION/CESSATION
OF A RECORD SUSPEI)|S|ON|
.
A record suspension may be revoked by the Board if the
person to whom it relates is
subsequently convicted of an offence punishable on summary conviction under an
l\ct of Parliament or a regulation rnade under an Act of Pilrliament; on evidence to
the satisfaction of the Board that the person is no longer of good conduct; or if the
per$on knowingly made a false or deceptive statement or concealed information in
relation to the application for the record suspension. These decisions require a vote
by a Board rnember, When
proposing to revoke a pardon, the Board will notify the
person and advise that person of his or her right to make representations.
.
A record suspension automatically ceases to have effect if the person is
siubsequently convicted of an offence prosecuted by indictment or an offence
punishable either by way of indictment or summary conviction
(hybrid offence). All
military indictable offences underthe Nafibnal Defence Acf willalso result in the
<;essation of a record suspension. The criminal record is then reactivated in CPIC
and there is no process or possibility for the
person to metke representations,
June,2A13
00003
Information Act / Document divulgue en vertu
de la LSi sur l'acces A l'information.
The Board may also cease a record suspension if it is convinced by new information
that the applicant was not eligible at the time the record suspension was initially
ordered.
o Exceptions include section 255 (1) of the CiminalCode (impaired driving) or hybrid
offences under the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act,the Firearms Acf, Part lll
or lV of the Food and Dnugs Acf or lhe Narcotic Contrcl Acf, chapter N-1 of the
Revised Stafutes of Canada, 1985, that are
punishable either on conviction on
indictment or on summary conviction. These offences may be considered by the
Board for a possible revocation, which entails the possibility to make representations
and require a Board Member vote.
KE:v MESSAGES
.
The record suspension program
takes into consideration the criminal history and the
lperson's
conduct in every case. More exhaustive assessments are conducted for the
more complex and severe cases, as additional requirements are
placed
on the
applicant and the Board, to establish the merilorious natur,e of the request and
reflsUt
the highest regard for the administration of
justice.
.
'fhe
record suspension workload is always significant, unpredictable and fluctuates
ias many externalfactors can impact both the number of applications received,on
iany given
day and the volume of data received from partners. Diligence is required
iat all times to ensure that the process
works efficiently, with all of the challenges that
it entails as far as resources and service delivery.
.
r\s
part
of the criminaljustice system, the Board relies on ilts relationship with other
justice partners in order to render
just,
independent and
quality decisions.
June>,2013
00004
I,* [ 3ii"i:.?f" 3"T[,Tffi""?,*:,i1"#:3:'
ISISUE 24: USER FEES
-
RECORD SUSPENSION
BrlgxgRoluNe
.
In 1994-95, the Treasury Board approved the introduction of a user fee for
processing of a record suspension (at that time the CriminalRecords Acf referred to
a pardon) applications. A user fee of $50 was introduced to reduce the overall costs
to
government by having citizens who use
government services
pay a portion of
these services. The fee represented a marginal
portion of the costs incurred by the
Parole Board of Canada (PBC) and the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) for
this work. The PBC received $35 and the RCMP received $15.
.
In the 16 years since the introduction of the user fee, the CIost to
process a record
suspension application rose substantially, however, the $50
fee remained
unchanged. During fiscalyears 2008/09 and 2009/10 the PBC had been working
towards increasing the user fee to make the
program sustainable.
o \Mth the coming into force of Bill C-23A (Limiting Pardons of Senous Crimes Act) on
June 29, 2010, the bench marks used to establish the fee were no longer valid and
consequently the fee became even further out of alignment with the costs to process
an application.
.
ln the fall of z}1l,the Minister of Public Safety tabled in both Houses of Parliament
an interim, partial cost recovery fee proposalto increase the user fee to $150.
The
Ministerial Order, which is the authority to fix the fee of $150,
came into effect on
December 29,2010.
.
l'he interim user fee of $150,
of which the Board receives $135,
covers the Board's
direct operational costs of
processing
a
pardon under the Criminal Records Act
(ARA) prior to amendments made in June 2010.
.
In April 2010, the Government announced its intention to implement a new cost
recovery modelwhich would recover the cost of processing a pardon
application
(rather than
just
the direct costs). The revised cost recovery model will increase the
pardon user fee to $631
($610 to the Board, $15 to the RCMP) and was derived
from a detailed assessment of the costs of delivering the pardon system under the
new requirements of the CRA enacted by C23-4.
r These costs did not include one-time start-up costs.
.
Consistent with the requirements of the User Fee Acf (Uf:A), the PBC conducted
on-line public consultation and consulted with other government departments
(OGDs) and external stakeholders from February 10lo 27,201 1 as part of the
lnformation Act / Document divulgu6 en vertu
de la Loisur l'accds d l'information.
BRIEFING NOTE
NOTE D'INFORMATION
June,2013
00005
Information Act / Document divulgu6 en vertu
de la Loi sur l'accds i l'information.
-2-
proposed increase to $631.
As a result of this consultation,
1,086 submissions
Were received with comments on the
proposed increase to the user fee,
. f n accordance with lhe llFA, 16 of the 1,086 consulted elected to submit their
complaint to an Independent Advisory Panel. The panel reviewed the complaints
and submitted a report of its findings to the PBC and complainants.
o
'l'he
panel's report and a package prepared by the PBC rr;flecting the results were
submitted for the Ministe/s review. The
proposed increase to the user fee was
tabled in both Houses of Parliament in February 2O12 and the fee was in force on
F:ebruary 23,2012.
STA US
e The fee has now been in place for more than one financial cycle. The consequence
has been a reduction in the votume of applications in comparison to previous years,
however on track based on forecast.
KE|Y MEgSAGES
o The current user fee of $631
will allow the Board to meet lts legislated mandate and
have the record suspension
program remain sustainable in the medium term.
o Any future amendments to the Criminal Records Act and increases in both salaries
and operating costs will require the costing estimates to be re-examined and the fee
to be revised.
June,2013
00006
{rtf*rmatl*n A*t I ffi*eument
en vertu
t'ipt
"li6'ii:f"*o
3"Tif;liH"i,i."iffi:8ffi L*i sun l'mre*s
{1$
00007
divul
ls$i$!J!: ADDRESSING THE PARDON BACKLOG
BA,CKGROUND
o
The number of Board members was based on the initial assessment conducted during the
costing for record suspensions in 2010 of 28 decisions in a day for files that do not contain a
sexual offence. The latter files take considerably longer at 8 a day but form less that 2Yo of
the overall volume.
r
The Board now has a total
"of
20 Board members trained on Pardons and Record Suspensions.
Of those 6 are part-time-Bgard members, 5 are Regional Vice-chairs and the Executive Vice-
chair, leaving 8 full-time Board members two of which are mostly dedicated to pardons and
record suspensions. The 6 full+ime Board members remaining are regularly removed from
pardons/record suspension decision-making for conditional release.
o An assessment of decision-making over the last fiscal year demonshates that Board members
render on average 12 pardon/record suspension decisions a day. At that rate the Board will
need 72.4 part-time Board members working 7 days every month over 24 months to clear the
existing backlog at a cost of approximately $ 1,431,360.
r ds of May 2013 there remained 19,739 pardon applications being investigated and 997 with
Eoard members waiting on a decision.
.
Work began in earnest, following training, in January 2013. The backlog then was a22,500.
In five months that number dropped by 2,761. At that rute,552 per month, the backlog
should be at approximately 14,187 by the end of fiscal2}Wl{.
KErYIIESSAGE9
o The PBC is working to eliminate the existing backlog of pardorr applications. It is looking to
fi'ain additional Board members in order to increase its decision making capacity.
Prepared by Denis Ladouceur, Director, Clemency and Record Suspension Division
June,2013
s.69(1){s} re
{d}
A-2013-00016
Inforrnation Act / Document divulgud en vert
de la Ldi sur l'accAs A l'information.
No information is vetted on this page.
;{F n :i6'5:ff"
:;"'frIlitH""l'*:Ji%'iil3l'
lnformation Act / Document divulgu6 en vertu
de la Loi sur l'accesFiil8fitffigi".
NOTE D'INFORMATION
|StiUE29:GLEMENCYPRoCESS(Roya|PrerogativeofMercy)
BA,CKGROUND
o The Royal Prerogative
of Mercy is a largely discretionary
power to apply exceptional
nlmedies under exceptional circumstances
to deserving ciases.
o The power to exercise the Royal Prerogative
of Mercy for federal offences is vested
in the Governor General of Canada Uyirirtue of the Letters; Patent constituting the
Office of the Governor General
(1g47i.In addition, the CriminalCode,
section 748,
authorizes the Governor in Councilto
grant free or conditional
pardons-and748.1
provides authority to order remission of fines,
pecuniary pranalties and forfeitures
irnposed under an act of Parliament'
o Clemency requests are, as a rule, forwarded
to the Federal Cabinet for a decision
rather than to the Governor Generatwho exercises
power only when the.remedy
sought cannot be granted by recourse to the relevant sections on the Criminal Code.
o lnr addition to granting free and conditional
pardons, remission of fine, forfeiture and
pecuniary penalty, th-e Governor Generalcan also
grant remission of sentence,
respite and relief from
prohibition'
!
,i:
r The Governor General or the Governor in Council may
griant clemency.upon
recommendation from any Minister, but normally it comes from the Minister of Public
{iafety.
CLE:MENCY PROCESS
o The
parole
Board of Canada reviews the applications,
conducts
investigations, at
the request of the Minister, and subsequently
male-s-recommendations
to the
Minister. In reviewing clemency applications, the PBC ustls ministerialdirection as
guiding principles wfiicn are mLantto provide for,a fair and equitable
process, while
ilnsuriid that clemency is granted only in very exceptional
and truly deserving
cases, The princiPles are:
> there musi be evidence of substantial injustice or undue hardship;
> each application is strictly examined on its own merits;
> the applicant must have exhausted all other avenues available under the
Criminal Code, or other pertinent legislation
(e'g'' CCRA);
> the independence of the
judiciary shall be respecteid in that there must be
stronger and more specific
grounds to recommend action that would interfere
with a court's decision;
> it is intended only for rare cases in which consideration of
justice,
humanity
and compassion override the normal administrationr
of
justice;
and,
> the decision should not, in any way, increase the penalty for the applicant'
June,2A13
00009
lnformation Act / Document
divulgue
en vertu
de la Loi sur l'acces
d l,information.
-2-
e
ln the past
the
llc
generally
received
less than 25 clemerncy requests per year;
however, in2012 alone it received
52 requests. In the last fivb years (20t0g-211\,
15 requests have been granted",
5 have been denied, and 107-have
Leen
discontinued.
The-majority
of requests were discontinued either uecause
the client
did not provide
sufficient informaiion
or proof
of excessive hardshijio pioceeo
with
the request, or because the Minister
deiermined that the clemency reqlest
did not
warrant investigation,
as the criteria were not met. Currenlly, there are
g6
active
files.
'
Amendments to the CriminatRecords
Acf (CRA), increasing efigibility periods
for
certain offences, has increased
the number of those affectdd uf tne Lh"nge.
to
apply for Clemency. Some have and will argue that the legislaiive chanle
establishes evidence of substantial
injustice-and/or undue'-hardship.
v
'
The amendments
to the CRA contained in the Etiminating Padons forSenous
Cnmes Aci which came into force on March 13,2012, hive also increased the
number of clemency requests. By making former sexual offenders ineligible
(approximately
2o/o of applicants)
and those with more tharr three indictibte
offences
ineligible (approximately
4o/o of applicants) for a "record suspension" it wilt be argued
that not only does it cause undue hardship but that these arre cases in which
consideration
of
justice,
humanity
and compassion override the normal
administration of
justice.
The cases currenily under review include 3 applicants
-
ineligible due to a Schedule 1 offence and 2 applicants who have been convicted of
more than 3 indictable offenses. Moreover, inquiries into tlre Clemency and Record
suspension Division have increased due to the legislative r:hange.
r
'fhe
consequence to the PBC is significant and is an unfunded increase in workload.
lFurther, it will also increase the volume of reviews being sernt to the Minister for
decision.
KEI|/
tr/tEssAcE
o
(]lemency
under the Royal Prerogative of Mercy is granted by the Governor General
<lr the Governor in Council only in exceptional circumstances.
s.19(1)
s.21(1)(a)
s.21(1)(b)
s.2a(l
June\ 2013
00010
I*l ffim"' ffg;:t*'
Document Released Under the Access to
discuss the contents of this repod at your convenience'
c.c.: Shawn Tupirer, Assistant Oeputy Minister ot Public Safety
A-20{3-00020
t
ro '
The Honourable Vic Tows, P.c., M.P'
A
Minister of Publ'tc Safety
---1
J
_l
_l
I
L
T
Fm
D.
I
L
Cheitprson
Parole Board of
ganada
Sobtrd
Obiet
lnformation Act / Document
{ivulguS
en vertu
J* r r loTTB?Al'bWcd8'5
loihlU'tft ati on'
tutrly Cla3sifstidl
. clsin6[o oa l
)ur Filc - NotE l6f6FM
latt
ilon$h
,.Dashborrd"
on REGord Susoonglon ope|ations and Decbions and BaqkligF
As requested,
please find attached th Monthly Dashboard report on Record Su$Pension
tor fisial 201a-t 4. tncluded with lhis reportlng is a separate "Dashboard'
progress on
decision making fn relatlon to tho bad(log.
The record susDension report ooverB the firSt two months of the new tiscal year' During that
oerioO ittJpeC has received 2,900 applications and accepted 1,837 with niR tecord
luspensions ora,i:red. The
ped
sril tris
g,993
apptications in process f19m the prevlous
year with 652 with a Board member for decision.
As for the backlog, ther remains 19,739 riles at investigation with
gg7
with Board membeB
t:
x
..,4
E
vl
n
,,,i:
14
*
tt:
F,
*
:2
a
v
u
:.:.:
D)
s
E
2
i::
.i.
fF
'N
:t
g
c
(.:
*,
.t
.r.
:e:
E]
E.
E:
(5:
;9:
3,
:6:
$l
o
ct
o
o
X:s
6^
LA
.9!
ts
I
I
I
\
I
t
I
I
6
;:
(l
't \c
E
tl
-!t 1
z4
o-l
>arA
E
-^;1
.i
g5
\tc
g'J*
:19!
xr;
. m1
fo.sq
u u$
+ !
;{*F
cx!
f
f
e
1.4
o
e
8x
*(c
tft
It
rl
&*
Rl 3 tzr
a.lld
T"$fr
*Fd
*,r.*
;
PX
ste
eEq"
Ll. 14 .I
q
f)g
$j ,'-1;
6g"i
-E' E(.is
:t -'r
,'x
Ei
8s
fl
.E{*{
XgA
Y
r*$eH
$'$ $
?gi
,i!r
--9.O
)r.
Ef*$
s?En
$E
h
f4i
\.{
i
Q.l
c{i
sJ
4i
Fi
ti
yl':
-4.t1
'#i
mi
*l
si
w
oa
'Xi
*i
{{i;
EJ*Xtu
x*s
##s
{Yt
r{
*
*.t
p.
X
r)
F
-g
v,
o
<n
'"]
q,
s
4t
(3
K
.4
o
15 r+r
H
rf.
a ':\:
s.l
Jn
e
6
s
F
P
I
c
E
!
{
/.<"^-z
(tt
o.
O
o
q
-#
oF.
&$
.>t
FO
:i F,
q,
&D
rB
4
Ft
EE
v ./.
n /l\
o.,v,
>;'
c,
lii
It
x
{0
o
f .."
''P
E+
g"ue
'i:;*
*$B
I
f
c
c)
g
afi
avr
E.E ;
9olh
{tv
_J
.'P
(t)
r.-
i=iO t
r-+Jh
o)
c.ll
ECI-
c.-
L
J J,rn
/\
XOU)
H
o'li
Q-- 5
tuil
$
4) >
.L-
fy' -\
L-
(-f
E0.,
96
q
t- r- -J
tt$
U a) --
qE
a.'
u:
-o
(9
o
o
o
o
I h trD
: i .grl
:
.t
il:
iE$g$$$
i$fBtieg
is$ ra$Eg
; . , , , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . , . . . . . . . . . ,
i---1
l=l
is f
ifr1
i$ *-f
is El
iE r,l
ie 4l
iA qi
i;
g
i *
eJl
rt Ei
ir.l
giH
HI
'frig
Fl
if el
Hi$
rl
B;B
.S,t
#i*
$t
si.".tl
iF
HI
,$._g
a&txi-
$#*3*
a$EFg
$fi$E$
{
",R
s'\'
En
-fi4
4E
rcl
vQ
ql
f^{
)
r-r1
l't
*>
at
E3
$'
+,
gL
t;t
,dl
tr
it,
L}
fL
*;
.r^.
t"
{,r
.4r
tr'
ai
fir
*t
.ci
q;!
r,.
vs
si'
:8 ;l
s!:
t)t 94
i
.rg
p
ta
t\t
l)
xt
o
te
a
I
E,*
ge
htl
xf4
.oJ it
ilE
$s
9.t
.85
f;to
9rd
R
dr4
o.&
.|3 'r
6 !3-
a4
qff
3h
x's
1 Y
9{U
b>
fip;
a"
iiS
&#
as
r*
(1 F
xa
q
,*U
:v
{);
f;s
'.,? ft"!
YFl
ffiJ
a!d
frv
t:. .g
?.5
3S
\rt L
&*
'it
6
,tQ
i;0
TB
s
*E
oo
P. c*
i;::li::::::::::1;:;:;r::?::;:::li;:::::lil::*::;::::r:t;r::t:tr::.*
i:, :::
i, i:
i:n
ii :1,
.i'
.> g;.t
:
*;
ud'
3
'n
I
z
.E
)
c
: -:1
dt<:t
::ba
'''c
13aq
t
i
I
t :i1
-q
rrr
:l
:.!
i
rj:
r>l
qFr
tl .-.
+
En
f!
F1
r*'
{\f
t
tcl
Pil
lial
gi
EI
&l
atl
?rl
ffi iis
t'.i
rl;i
Cr
".:.'
fqi
{;l
-i
d:.
ts

t-
4
3
. /, 'l:
:?1:t:!:: :
,!rir
I
. ti.:
''
ir i
L.r l:: :
v::: :
D::: :
Fo:,,
'
Ol:' ,
el. :
mi::: :
<l i:. :
r, i::
.
ioit :
$i; :
$!':
'
rdi. :
L':::: :
s}-i:.
gf,l
bei'i
g!:.
gr:
e i;
g
::.;
.aa
-:l
>t
E ::i
3 ::i
< ::l
::1
"''
.:'i:
a:lj
:::;:::
l:,,'l
:::::
rl:i::
,,,,,t
:::::l
:r$:
i4it
:e.
;W,
:::
:::::
:::::,::
::::::
:::.:.:
:::::::
,:,ii:
:36:
':t
v
:
"
$
g
cy,fi
tn
\rr
R's
y,J
V(})X
{lv
c) sft
9:re L
!-*r k

F
r.-
La"a
l-
r{
'(U
Holrl
H
n'gi
(E
-*
ii
,9-x 6
CI*ts-
fl/
-{. r-
k --1
Ebr
P6
q
F r--J
;Icu
!1 0-
t H.s
Document Releaserd Under the Access to
iii:..ir. iil
Pi,.rols 3osr,l D(urrn,;sSisrr dc;s lrbi|atror'rs
i:ir::
'r:r:
iil. <ri C:r:iada cgr,rjitiDr:a;@5 d:; 0a33da
I
'jn
i
Fstt.t
ChiiirperSon
Ds
Parole Boarci of Cairadg
l_
Minister's ResDor)sa
I apprci,e; ;
I dc not approv: ,--
Vic Toews. P.C.. O.C., i/.P
The Honoulabie Vic Toe,ss, P.C., Q,C., ful,P.
Minisler of Fublic $afeiy, Qsplsdu
i
i
I
i
.---J
t*
I
Suujerl
ODitgt
Hsase$tf of MinlgteteApggy.at;.Fvp.c!.p- j?g*ij#p.g:!lfg;g8,!CIPq
Under the auspices of the Treasury BoarC Directive on the tvlanagement af ExpenditrJres on Travel,
Ccnference,arrd 'r'lespitalityi w &r required !r eeek ycur approval fcr'eventso orhei than core
rnsncii:le and trairiihg in whioh lotal costs exi;eei1 $25,t10C.
$Je hale estimeieci that iotal cosls for the next iounr:l ai Bcarct menrber inte.rview* wili exceed ihis
ihreshold, and are therelbrc EeeRlng yorlr approvsi in oi.der thal we sen make the r'eqUired
arrangemenis, I he atlactred fonnv pn)vid}
deli:iis of Dur ccvl estitnate.
Given the requirement io acquii'e approval pr'ior to tinelizing tiavel arnangemeqts, suah as bcokirrg
flights and confirpning hplels,
gs
weil as rhe escaiating costs:ac we epproaeh the havel daies, r,ve
rntculd be much appfeciaiive of ie6eiving your #ecision ai
your eariiest convetience,
pleggg
feei freo tofonte.&l me if
-vcu
ha'ie an)1 qr.,e*tilns.
,.-
,t .J .^ l,
I
'
-'"\i:j
"*'
F,",,,,..'l-\rrt"'
"
-.
- "
(:
_,!,'*....--..'*..
Har"eY Cenaiko
Encl.
['l]
I nfor mnUom$CIt,{qep ffi^ffitqlat d i vu I g u e en ve rt u
de la Loi sur l'accris A l'information.
fra|e'.
ae
00004
Fvent:
furrWs.e;
fialtt:
LMa?.iott:
9r:fnrmmti*n A*t / ili*eurnsnt divt"rlgu* sR vsntu
Faro.{e #ssrd *f {*n*dn de [m L*i sur l'm*eqis & l'inf*rrxatinn.
T r# v e l, o*fe r * n rc s s n d *4 o s p ft * I f tt1 E v e wt,4B p rav a f
llaar<J t*estbei lntcrvievn; - Session 2
{frtt{tber z7l2-lvl*rck 2fr13 upxlicunt:
-
lnten,iietils ol potentifrl Eoard fultmbers
****rn*nt *:?*{*ffi$*d Lir"rdan ths &e**$s ts
rr
l\ttitE:.
$*ppl
s,- *g! !
/:,e.d
-tg
ft1:
MinrsSerj lj uld,l *ttimated
s\periEs >
595;Orti"
dnd/ar eny
h Ds pir.e t ; r.tr ? lem E nts
fil 1.2 aaqly.
elelf$-erjr4i
( stal Ktiffiated
aupenses >.$5,000 but
<
oy;izs,gpDatd/rtr
hos?itaitty > Sf,Sag
but:< ot
= 55,ar0, aad
no*e at l:|tr
t! D s p i tti li ry e ]em e h ts'
in i.j ap.ptr,
Ss,l!-<!t
ry totai Estidated
Lt-oJ|-q=t.igr'i, ex/tnsts < c: .
6oq RerE4El
gs,${Jo,
and/Lr
v,!4.&2;5
ceacral]t
hnsPitgi;eYls<
gt=
$tr,SflB.cnd no
nospitdiili elr||,ents
ln 1,2 apply.
i
,ii',,
i i
'j',
Voriaex dttes sereas ttts Eauntlv
Prepared 5.*:
Appj uYe{.by,
33te
00005
Document Reledserd Under
Information Act / Dr:cument
the Access to
divulgue en vertu
Ewnt
Purp6e:
Date:
Lfro&$
Parole Eoord of Canada
de la Loi sur l'acces a l'information.
Travel Conterences ond Hospitdlity Event Appraval - Detsilled Cost Cslculstions
Basrd Member lnterviews - Session 2 (Oaober 2072-Morch 20lj applicontsl
tryntewsof poteffi"t e.trd
^
.y3
io*a"tes
_
Varlous cities across the country
Estirnated Staod.rd Otl tor M{als /A[owaffer 589.85 bated on Travel Diectivc for 42 days
[smored Standard c$rfq trlcrli/Atlomqet 915.15 bascd on Trave lO]rectlve fof 1? days (rhfse padclpanu do not lechre tlre ful] dty of rDeayalioKnceii
lEdmrted Strndqd Cost {ry Acaonrnodarltn 5159.00 bated on Accommodallon Dlrectpry rdtei ln lafg cantr6.
llstjmled Strndard Csl f6 OtlEr (taxles, parkn& tc-) le ba*d s SSO.00
pcrdry for 59 day3
.
deflnldgn: B6lnst msctln8r
lwtrliogs6sb6,
wl plaonlng retlogs,advisdv?nd maBgrmol.ommltte.
csft{etences rrqerl s awothartqmal g,thcrlngot federal goyamment or nsF edenlSdemmeai
peffi
to p.rtiripat{ h adMti6 wh s interoiis lor rec.uibftnt in tho poblic seflke, pt$tiSlos ceroffi's, awfd3
eremqio. Exclldct trainiry, hsrlngs and vi<Jrc.on{erencel.
00006
o
o
o
o
,3
"
#
g
rn
{u
H's
VffiX
<lv
\
0) #6
rz 'd
-}* '?Ft >-
vL_
L-4J h
() c#
eCIc
r r'*
L{Pd^
@r
;-{
'$
XOU)
H
n'9i
(E--
X
Qaiffi
c);7:-
n/
x"
t-
-T
x6w
E6 E
?- r-
-J
;b$
(J
r.)*
aE a:
f-l
L- -rr
lJ
g
3
6
b
c
;
3
6
I
E
5
F
E
.s
t
2
n
n
=3
9.
z9
e4
.F
95
66
gP
}P
>9
6i
OJ
q
a
:

o
,:
g

6
E
E
I
b+
F!
it
6t
g,E
c6
De
:5
pa
63
d6
zz
E;i
999
6B;
ETE
=oa
bbb
66
b3b
99!
E-g,E
999
888
*;x
6EA
8!3
2
.E
't
e
'6
E
o
E
!
=3
I
=E
+!
9;
ra
g9
oE
}E
ez
gr
OJ
2'
EE
-5
3:
bb
!5
.s ,g
99
83
.>5
ss
33
Pg
z2
I
I
>l
*l
8
;l e,
Et
= nl x
o*
"'l
i
st d
!o'
'Ee
F.9
:{
g
;ts
,fii
q
I
q
'E
Bg
tf,
.Oo
vl
b.E
Fe
Eq
^E
df, -o
*>l
t6
{l

o
o
o

f
t
q)
g
n6
E.E :
,b
-t
<-J
(l)
r,-F
i=iC t
r--*, h
I6E
(-,-
LF^
-LE
r
f
"o
HE.'l,
HO,Fi
(E--
X
()?i
6
Q).y-
fY
\.
r-
rf
E0.CI
gE
o
F rJ
=t$
(J
-eF
al
flL-:Ft
v