Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
and
Costs
ASSOCIATE
Member (magazine not included)
DISTINGUISHED
Citizen (65 yrs or older)
STUDENT
INDiViDUAL
COUPLE/FAMILy
WALLBuilder (complimentary AA Tote Bag)
LIFE
MARCH 2007
Vol 45, No.3
Hrn~rimnHth~ist Ma~alim
ISSN0516-9623
March 2007
Editor, American Atheist Press
Frank Zindler
Editor, American Atheist Magazine
Ellen Johnson
Regular Contributors
Martin Foreman
Conrad F.Goeringer
Frank Zindler
CONTENTS
4
by Ellen Johnson
Designer
Elias Scultori
Cover Design
18
Tim Mize
Editorial Assistants
Gil and Jeanne Gaudia
13
by Rene Salm
Published monthly
(Except June & December) by
American Atheists Inc.
16
Mailing Address:
P.O.Box 5733
Parsippany, NJ 07054-6733
12
phone - 908.276.7300
FAX - 908.276.7402
editor@americanatheist.org
www.atheists.org
Idiopathy
by Wendy Babiak
15
Gotcha!
by Gil Gaudia, Ph.D.
24
Culture Watch
Left Behind: Eternal Forces
by Conrad F.Goeringer
Quackwatch
Twenty-Five Ways To Spot Quacks And Vitamin Pushers
by Dr. Stephen
30
Barrett
2'3
Foreman
31
o. Shapiro
N~v~m~~r
Miu- I~rmIl~~ti~m
The Results Are In
How You Voted And More!
Ellen Johnson
AMERICANATHEIST -
MARCH2007
*OTHERS
HUMANIST4
FREETHINKER
6
AGNOSTICS
Solstice Error?
Editor:
I enjoyed Ellen Johnson's column in the Nov./Dec.'06 issue
of American Atheist. She is lucky to have grown up in a nonreligious family!
I also appreciated the "Solstice Season"by Madalyn O'Hair.
I must note, however, that Madalyn erred when she attributed
the solstices and equinoxes to the earth's elliptical orbit along
with the inclination of the earth's axis. She also errs when she
stated "when we are in points furthest away from the Sun, we
have another phenomenon. That, along with the 23% inclination of the earth, causes the solstices." In actuality, the earth
would have four seasons even with a purely circular orbit, as
the sole cause of the seasons is the 23.5% (not 23%) inclination of the earth's axis. The distance of the earth from the sun
is not relevant as to when it is winter, spring, summer or fall. In
fact, perihelion (the closest point at 90.5 million miles) occurs
in January, so when it is winter in the northern hemisphere, we
are closer to the Sun than we are in July, when aphelion (the
furthest point at 94 million miles) is attained! This may seem
contradictory, but keep in mind that the seasons are reversed
in the southern hemisphere!
Moreover, because of a phenomenon known as the precession of the equinoxes, which causes the earth to rotate
like a top around its axis (constantly inclined at 23.5%) every
27,000 years or so,the time will come when winter in the northern hemisphere occurs at aphelion and winter in the southern
hemisphere will occur at perihelion, the reverse of the present
situation.
The only effect the elliptical orbit has on the seasons is that
when winter occurs at aphelion it will be colder (because the
Sun is further away) and longer (because Kepler's Laws means
that the earth moves more slowly when it is further away from
the Sun) than would be the case at perihelion and points in between. In other words, the intensity and duration of the seasons
will be affected, but not the timing of the seasons.
Dennis Middlebrooks, NY
MARCH')ffJ7 -
AMERICANATHEIST
AMERICANATHElSf -
MARCH2007
copyright
with permission.
for readers under
18 years of age.
The
FoJlI'\Clers
t-nenCls ...
and
quackwatch
Iw~nty-fiv~Way~I~~~~t~ua~k~HnrrVitamin~u~h~r~
by Dr. Stephen Barrett
Ow
can food quacks and other vitamin pushers be recognized? Here are 25 signs that should arouse suspicion.
1. When Talking About Nutrients, They Tell
Only Part of the Story.
Quacks tell you all the wonderful things that vitamins and
minerals do in your body and/or all the horrible things that can
happen if you don't get enough. Many claim that their products or
programs offer "optimal nutritional support." But they conveniently
neglect to tell you that a balanced diet provides the nutrients most
people need and that "government guidelines" makes balancing your
diet simple.
2. They Claim That Most Americans Are Poorly Nourished.
This is an appeal to fear that is not only untrue, but ignores
the fact that the main forms of bad nourishment in the United States
are obesity in the population at large, particularly the poor, and undernourishment among the poverty-stricken. Poor people can ill-afford to waste money on unnecessary vitamin pills. Their food money
should be spent on nourishing food.
It is falsely alleged that Americans are so addicted to "junk"
foods that an adequate diet is exceptional rather than usual. While it
is true that some snack foods are mainly "naked calories" (sugars and/
or fats without other nutrients), it is not necessary for every morsel
of food we eat to be loaded with nutrients. In fact, no normal person
following the "Dietary Guidelines for Americans" is in any danger of
vitamin deficiency.
3. They Recommend "Nutrition Insurance" for Everyone.
Most vitamin pushers suggest that everyone is in danger of deficiency and should therefore take supplements as "insurance." Some
suggest that it is difficult to get what you need from food, while others claim that it is impossible. Their pitch resembles that of the doorto-door huckster who states that your perfectly good furnace is in
danger of blowing up unless you replace it with his product. Vitamin
pushers will never tell you who doesn't need their products. Their "be
wary of deficiency" claims may not be limited to essential nutrients.
It can also include nonessential chemicals that nobody needs to worry
about because the body makes its own supply.
4. They Say That Most Diseases Are Due to Faulty Diet
and Can Be Treated with "Nutritional" Methods.
This simply isn't so. Consult your doctor or any recognized
textbook of medicine. They will tell you that although diet is a factor
in some diseases (most notably coronary heart disease), most diseases
have little or nothing to do with diet. Common symptoms like malaise (feeling poorly), fatigue, lack of pep, aches (including headaches)
or pains, insomnia, and similar complaints are usually the body's re-
AMERICANATHEISf
Baubles of Blasphemy
by Edwin Kagin
...a fiery combination of a backwoods
manner; feral urbanity, and an absolutely
ruthless search for truth ...
- Tom Flynn, Free Inquiry
Clamors for a place on the bookshelf of
any thoughtful person. Believer or infidel.
- Ellen Johnson,American Atheists
...a must-read for everyone in the
community of reason as well as for all
others with an open mind ...
- Mel Lipman,American Humanists
Association
This book wi/l win Edwin Kagin a firstclass ticket to hell.
- Dan Barker, Freedom From
Religion Foundation
stock # 9901
$20.00 (AA Members Price: $18.00)
AMERICANATHEIST -
MARCH2007
While it is true that the need for vitamins may rise slightly
under physical stress and in certain diseases, this type of advertising is
fraudulent. The average American-stressed or not-is not in danger
of vitamin deficiency. The increased needs to which the ads refer are
not higher than the amounts obtainable by proper eating. Someone
who is really in danger of deficiency due to an illness would be very
sick and would need medical care, probably in a hospital. But these
promotions are aimed at average Americans who certainly don't need
vitamin supplements to survive the common cold, a round of golf,
or a jog around the neighborhood! Athletes get more than enough
vitamins when they eat the food needed to meet their caloric requirements.
Many vitamin pushers suggest that smokers need vitamin C
supplements. Although it is true that smokers in North America have
somewhat lower blood levels of this vitamin, these levels are still far
above deficiency levels. In America, cigarette smoking is the leading cause of death preventable by self-discipline. Rather than seeking
false comfort by taking vitamin C, smokers who are concerned about
their health should stop smoking. Suggestions that "stress vitamins"
are helpful against emotional stress are also fraudulent.
12. They Recommend "Supplements" and "Health Foods"
for Everyone.
Food quacks belittle normal foods and ridicule the food-group
systems of good nutrition. They may not tell you they earn their living from such pronouncements-via
public appearance fees, product
endorsements, sale of publications, or financial interests in vitamin
companies, health-food stores, or organic farms.
The very term "health food" is a deceptive slogan. Judgments
about individual foods should take into account how they contribute
to an individual's overall diet. All food is health food in moderation;
any food is junk food in excess. Did you ever stop to think that your
corner grocery, fruit market, meat market, and supermarket are also
health-food stores? They are-and they generally charge less than
stores that use the slogan.
By the way, have you ever wondered why people who eat lots
of "health foods" still feel they must load themselves up with vitamin supplements? Or why so many "health food" shoppers complain
about ill health?
13. They Claim That "Natural" Vitamins are Better than
"Synthetic" Ones.
This claim is flatly a lie. Each vitamin is a chain of atoms
strung together as a molecule. With minor exceptions, molecules
made in the "factories" of nature are identical to those made in the
factories of chemical companies. Does it make sense to pay extra for
vitamins extracted from foods when you can get all you need from
the foods themselves?
14. They Suggest That a Questionnaire Can Be Used to
Indicate Whether You Need Dietary Supplements.
No questionnaire can do this. A few entrepreneurs have devised lengthy computer-scored questionnaires with questions about
symptoms that could be present if a vitamin deficiency exists. But
such symptoms occur much more frequently in conditions unrelated
to nutrition. Even when a deficiency actually exists, the tests don't
provide enough information to discover the cause, so that suitable
treatment can be recommended. That requires a physical examination and appropriate laboratory tests. Many responsible nutritionists
use a computer to help evaluate their clients' diet. But this is done
to make dietary recommendations, such as reducing fat content or
increasing fiber content. Supplements are seldom necessary unless the
person is unable (or unwilling) to consume an adequate diet.
-me
Jesus.
t~
MARCH '2fJJ7 -
AMERICAN ATHE/Sf
ing the 1930s. No such "toxins" have ever been found, and careful
observations have shown that individuals in good health can vary
greatly in bowel habits. Quacks may also suggest that fecal material collects on the lining of the intestine and causes trouble unless
removed by laxatives, colonic irrigation, special diets, and/or various
herbs or food supplements that "cleanse" the body. The falsity of this
notion is obvious to doctors who perform intestinal surgery or peer
within the large intestine with a diagnostic instrument. Fecal material
does not adhere to the intestinal lining. Colonic irrigation is done by
inserting a tube into the rectum and pumping up to 20 gallons of water in and out. This type of enema is not only therapeutically worthless but can cause fatal electrolyte imbalance. Cases of death due to
intestinal perforation and infection (from contaminated equipment)
have also been reported.
Baubles of Blasphemy
by
Edwin Kagin
AMERICAN A1HEISf
MARCH
2007
Do you believe they would conspire to suppress cures for diseases that
also afflict them and their loved ones? When polio was conquered,
iron lungs became virtually obsolete, but nobody resisted this advancement because it would force hospitals to change. And neither
will scientists mourn the eventual defeat of cancer.
24. They Warn You Not to Trust Your Doctor.
Quacks, who want you to trust them, suggest that most doctors are "butchers" and "poisoners." They exaggerate the shortcomings of our healthcare delivery system, but completely disregard their
own-and those of other quacks. For the same reason, quacks also
claim that doctors are nutrition illiterates. This, too, is untrue. The
principles of nutrition are those of human biochemistry and physiology, courses required in every medical school. Some medical schools
don't teach a separate, required course labeled "Nutrition" because
the subject is included in other courses at the points where it is most
relevant. For example, nutrition in growth and development is taught
in pediatrics, nutrition in wound healing is taught in surgery, and
nutrition in pregnancy is covered in obstetrics. In addition, many
medical schools do offer separate instruction in nutrition.
A physician's training, of course, does not end on the day of
graduation from medical school or completion of specialty training.
The medical profession advocates lifelong education, and some states
require it for license renewal. Physicians can further their knowledge
of nutrition by reading medical journals and textbooks, discussing
cases with colleagues, and attending continuing education courses.
Most doctors know what nutrients can and cannot do and can tell the
difference between a real nutritional discovery and a piece of quack
nonsense. Those who are unable to answer questions about dietetics
(meal planning) can refer patients to someone who can-usually a
registered dietitian. Like all human beings, doctors sometimes make
mistakes. However, quacks deliver mistreatment most of the time.
25. They Encourage Patients to Lend Political Support to
Their Treatment Methods.
A century ago, before scientific methodology was generally accepted, valid new ideas were hard to evaluate and were sometimes
rejected by a majority of the medical community, only to be upheld
later. But today, treatments demonstrated as effective are welcomed by
scientific practitioners and do not need a group to crusade for them.
Quacks seek political endorsement because they can't prove that their
methods work. Instead, they may seek to legalize their treatment and
force insurance companies to pay for it. One of the surest signs that a
treatment doesn't work is a political campaign to legalize its use.
11)
12J
13J
Young JH, McFayden RE. The Koch Cancer Treatment. Journal of the
History of Medicine 53:254-284, 1998.
Hambidge KM. Hair analyses: Worthless for vitamins, limited for minerals. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 36:943-949, 1983.
Barrett S. The American Association of Nutritional Consultants:
Who and what does it represent?
Quackwatch, revised July 2004.
MARCH2007 -
AMERICANATHEIST
11
by Steve Berthiaume
The Sun Newspaper
Lowell, Massachusetts
12/11/2006
12
AMERiCANAniEIST -
MARCH2007
patibility of the various religions that the debate has become sidetracked
into discussions that threaten to become ridiculously baroque and are
ultimately beside the point: Worshipping spirits is inappropriate at City
Council meetings.
That notwithstanding, the four religions that seem to be on the
fast-track to government sanction (Islam, Buddhism, Judaism and Hinduism) were seemingly chosen on the basis of number of adherents. But
what neither the City Council nor the GLILA has realized is that the
number of non-religious Americans (29 million, according to the 2001
ARlS survey) dwarfs the number of adherents of the other four religions
under consideration combined (less than 6 million). In addition, this
number is on the rise, having more than doubled in 10 years, from 13
million ill 1990. What about the rights of this growillg segment of society?
Keeping state and church separate benefits not only atheists, naturalists and other secularists,but religious people as well-it allows a level
playing field for all citizens when dealing with the government. My.organization, the Atheists of Greater Lowell, has fielded several complaints
in recent months from atheists and others who have had their confidence
in local government undermined by the spectacle of group spirit-worship in public. Government leaders are supposed to decide public issues
through the use of reason and thought, and the opening prayer gives one
the impression that issues will be decided on personal superstition and
faith. Further, those who have contacted us are understandably reluctant
to speak publicly about this, for the very reason of opposing the local
leadership's official endorsement of Catholicism. This will not do.
Wouldn't the best solution be to abolish any prayer, bring the
city into constitutional compliance, and get down to city business?Th~t
the prayer is traditional is irrelevant: The issue here is whether prayer IS
appropriate, and it is clearly not in an increasingly diverse and educated
society.The subcommittee should be disbanded, all City Council prayer
abolished, and the councilors should concentrate on doing the public
business, while remaining ftee to worship as they choose---on their own
time and in their own churches.
ecent American Atheist column contained surprising results of new research into one of the most important venues of the Christian story: the town of Nazareth. This topic
as been contentious for many years, and it is no coincidence that significant research into the dubious origins of Christianity
(namely, proof that Nazareth did not exist in the time of Jesus) should
first appear in these pages, given what I consider the common sense
and scientific acumen indigenous to Atheists. Of course, damaging
material such as this puts the very stiff Christian neck in a scientific
noose, as it were, and the Christian press has no interest in kicking
the chair out from under itself. A nudge by well-intentioned Atheists
at this critical juncture won't hurt. With the knowledge that Nazareth
did not exist in the time ofJesus, we have our fingers wrapped around
one of the chair legs and are now poised to give it a decided heave.
The column in the November-December issue of American Atheist was aptly titled "Why The Truth About Nazareth Is Important." *
This topic is indeed important, but not for the most obvious reason.
After all, where Jesus reallycame from is hardly earthshaking. What must
matter to all Christians, however, is the inescapable fact that the evangelists invented this basic element in the story of cosmic redemption. The
proof is now at hand that "Jesus of Nazareth," a long-standing icon of
Western civilization, is bogus.
There can be no return to the comforting familiarity of the past,
for with the proof that Nazareth did not exist at the turn of the era, the
gospels leave the realm of history and forever enter the realm of myth. It
is a swift kick to the solar plexus of Christian inerrantism, the scholarly
equivalent of a punch sending the opponent to the mat-perhaps even
a knockout.
THE MYTH OF NAZARETH boots Christian certitude out
the window, and the door is now wide open to ask, "What else did the
evangelists invent?" As after the recent power shift in Congress, there
will be questions. Up until now the tradition has been able to fend off
attacks from the intellectual left because those attacks lacked proof. Now,
archaeology has supplied the proof, and with it the balance finally shifts.
The Church's position must fall like a house of cards. After all, Nazareth
is mentioned in all four canonical gospels and is neither an insignificant
nor a passing element. If the tradition invented his hometown, then who
can place faith in other aspects of the Jesus story, such as his virgin birth,
miracles, crucifixion, or resurrection? Were these also invented? What, in
other words, is left in the gospels of which the average Christian can be
sure?What is left of his or her faith?
Scholars can now apply this radical new information to problems
that have bedeviled them for three centuries, as they fruitlessly have tried
to reconcile contradictions and make sense out of four narratives that
obstinately refuse to agree. For example, it has long been known that the
birth stories in Matthew and Luke are incompatible (in the Gospel of
Matthew the Holy Family comes from Bethlehem, not Nazareth). Again,
why isJesus so often interacting with Pharisees in the Galilee, where they
were hardly known before 70 CE? Why does Luke write about a preposterous Roman census in which everyone returned to his birthplace
to register for taxation (Luke 2: 1-7)?The Romans were far too practical
to mandate such a recipe for instant social chaos. Besides, the evangelist
was in error by several years (a different type of census took place in 6
CE). In any case, Galilee was not within the area of direct Roman jurisdiction (it was administered by the puppet ruler, Herod Antipas). To
make a long story short, the invention of Nazareth now brings another
alternative to the fore: these elements are not historical at all. They, too,
are make-believe.
For readers who may not have the prior article at hand, I would
like to summarize the results of my research on Nazareth carried out over
the last eight years. Chronologically, those results can be reduced to the
following five points:
(1) The earliest settlement in the Nazareth basin was destroyed
about 730 BCE during the Assyrian conquest of the Holy Land. Before
that time, the Bronze-Iron Age settlement (which had been in existence
for some 1300 years) was not known as Nazareth but as japhia, a town
mentioned in the Bible and in Egyptian records.
(2) The destruction of Japhia was followed by a hiatus in settlement lasting from the late eighth century BCE until the late first century
CEo During those eight centuries no one lived in the Nazareth basin.
(3) Nazareth came into being between the two Jewish revolts (70
CE-135 CE). That is, the town appeared when most scholars allege that
the evangelists were writing their gospels. The appearance of Nazareth
toward the end of the first century CE is confirmed most significantly by
'1ustratea Stories
Prom 'The t.Bi6Ce
P,mlFarrell
t!4JstritooiryblhyDl/OI(/Iud
MARCH 7JYJ7 -
AMERICAN AniEIST
13
the finding of the twenty-nine earliest oil lamps (the most datable finds),
which date 25 CE-135 CEo In addition, the twenty-odd Roman tombs
in the basin all postdate 50 CEo
(4) It is not possible that Mary, Jesus, and Joseph lived where
tradition says, namely, in the vicinity of the Church of the Annunciation. Not only was Nazareth not yet in existence during the time of the
Holy Family, but Jewish law mandates that domiciles not be near tombs
(corpses are a source of rirual impurity). This is significant because the
venerated area was part of the village cemetery and agriculrural district.
For over fifteen hundred years, in fact, Christian pilgrims have been visiting and worshipping at a Late Roman cemetery and wine press.
(5) Nazareth was at first a Jewish village (without the admixture
of heretics or pagans). It has lasted continuously from about 100 CE to
the present.
The invention of Nazareth is proof positive that the evangelists
were spinning a yarn, that the Gospels are myth in a big way, and that the
Christian faith is, well ... (supply the appropriate word). No longer can
conservatives tout "gospel truth," one of the three solas of the Reformation: Sola gratia, sola fide, sola scriptura ("Only grace, only faith, only
scriprure"). As the third leg of this triad dissolvesbefore our very eyes, the
other two must soon succumb as well.
Without Nazareth there can be no Christianity. After all, the village is more than the alleged hometown of Jesus. It is also the venue of
the Annunciation. We all know the story: "In the sixth month the angel
Gabriel was sent from God to a city of Galilee named Nazareth, to a
virgin betrothed to a man whose name was Joseph, of the house of David; and the virgin's name was Mary" (Luke 1:26-27). The Church will
now have to look for another venue, where God united with the Blessed
Virgin to produce a son both divine and human, and to boggle the mind
of man ever since. But we needn't hold our collective breath as twentyfirst century priests and nuns scour the Galilee for the real site of the annunciation. If such bull-headed clerics and conservatives do embark on
that misguided vision quest, we should wish them better luck than their
first choice, for the present Church of the Annunciation sits in a Roman
cemetery dating a couple of hundred years after the time of Christ. It's
too late, though, because "The siruation is hopeless," goes an Austrian
proverb, "but not serious." So also with Nazareth. The situation is hopelessfor the tradition, but hopeful for Freethinkers everywhere.
When one door closesanother opens. If Nazareth did not exist in
the time ofJesus, then the enigmatic term "Nazarene" (or "Nazorean")ftequently found in Mark and in the other gospels-cannot refer to a
place at all but must refer to something else; something long forgotten.
This makes sense, for in the Acts of the Apostles (24:5) Paul is accused
of being a "ringleader of the sect of the Nazoreans." Obviously, he was
not the ringleader of inhabitants of Nazareth! The Semitic root ofNazarene means "guard, preserve" (verb) and "branch, shoot" (noun). Thus,
Paul was accused of being a leader of people who were trying to preserve
something they considered precious. What that was has yet to be determined. In any case, the (probably pre-Pauline) religion of the Nazarenes
must have been very different from the Christianity we know today.
Celebrate, Freethinkers ... Christianity as we know it may be finally coming to an end!
AMBuCAN ATHEIST -
MARCH 2fYJ7
representiQ9
YOu
12/21106 -
12/21/06 -
12/22/06 12/30/06 -
01/03/07 -
01/08/07 -
01/11/07 -
In Memoriam
Sara
Scott
Lois
PA
Bard-MANHEIM,
AndreWS-LAYTON,
Dahle-SALT
Utah
Lake City,
Utah
bot~na!
by Gil Gaudia, Ph.D.
God
s willing to prevent evil but not able? Then he is not omnipotent. Is he able but not willing? Then he is malevolent.
Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil? Is he
neither able nor willing? Then why call him God?"
Most Atheists love this riddle, because in it, Epicurus flawlessly
outlines the implausibility of the God myth. Yet for centuries, even educated people, have attempted to ignore, challenge and refine its inescapable chain of reasoning. In doing so they have concocted various strategies, against the evidence and reason of science, including the one I like
best; the unassailable bedrock argument of Christian apologists; reason's
greatest cop out, "We humans are just unable to understand God's mysterious ways."
Question: Why would a benevolent God allow a holocaust to
take place?Answer: He had a purpose that we can't fathom.
Question: Why did He allow Katrina to kill hundreds of thousands?
Answer: There's a higher value to this suffering, that we humans
cannot comprehend.
Question: Why are there irreconcilable contradictions in the
Bible?
Answer: We cannot interpret the Bible by using our limited human standards.
Any argument offered by an Atheist, Agnostic, scientist or just
plain logical thinker, who seeks to understand the claims of religion, specificallyChristianity, will happily be discussed by apologists-using the
same logic that the rest of us rely upon. They generally try to engage in a
reasonable sounding seriesof questions and answers-"Why is X?" "Oh,
because of B." But they will only allow the logical discussion to proceed
so far. When the theist is presented with the rational statement that cannot be refuted; or asked the question that cannot be answered without
contradiction-as does Epicurus' "So why call him God?-when a definitive statement is uncontrovertibly arrived at; when the undeniable
final point is made, the apologist invariably invokes the "God's mysterious ways"alibi. What elsecan they do? They can't just storm off in a huff;
good Christians don't like to do that.
And that's when they not only stop thinking, but they expect you
to do the same.
Well, let's assume that they are correct-that we can't understand
God's reasons for doing certain things. If so, then now can all the interpreters and apologists for the Bible, and Christianity, claim to be able to
comprehend and explain to us, all the other nonsense in the Christian
mythology. Why for example, are they able to explain the six-day creation by hypothesizing that "perhaps a day means 500 million years?"
This is an apparent (if lame) attempt at using some form oflogic.
They do pretty well trying to sound logical in other examples;
with the fact that the Bible claims that God created light before he created the sun (Where did the light come from?) Their answer here is that
it could come from the background radiation, or some other, as yet, undiscovered form of energy, that was converted into light, in an apparently
plausible (to them) explanation. Notice that they try to use some quasiscientific sounding blather to continue to sound logical.
Where did Cain find a wife, ..? No problem. Perhaps Adam and
Eve had other offspring, including a daughter, who wandered off somewhere, and Cain accidentally ran into her in the Land of Nod or East of
Eden and they got married. That makes sense. What about incest?That's
another problem. Don't try to confuse things.
In other words, they see logic and reason as desirable in explaining much of the mystery of religion, because it is, well, so reasonable to
do so. It may, in fact, be just barely possible that when the Bible says "a
day" it means 500 million years. It is, say,just barely possible, that when
Jesus said he would arise after "three days in the tomb" that three days
meant "a portion of any three days" and not three consecutive twentyfour hour periods. Decomposition of the corpse? That's another issue.
Don't try to confuse things
Why are they willing to use reason and logic to explain the things
they can get away with, but when backed into a corner with irrefutable
logic, they resort to the ultimate excuse?
How can you fail to comprehend the most fundamentally obvious flaw in Epicurus' paradox (which points to the logical impossibility
of a benevolent omnipotence) and yet, at the same time, unravel and explain in detail the Virgin Birth, the existence of God and the logic of the
trinity-monotheism with a three-in-one-God. How can a single God
appeal to his other self to save him ("My God, why hast thou forsaken
me?" pleaded Jesus on the cross.)
The only mystery to me is the fact that Christians, when faced
with irrefutable evidence of their nonsensical ideas, fail to admit that they
see what we are talking about.
Logic and reason are used exactly the way Atheists and scientists
use them until, ... the contradiction that cannot be rationalized emerges.
Then it's, ... We just can't understand God's mysterious ways. GOTCHA!
MARCH?fYJ7 -
AMERlCANATHEISf
15
IDIOPATH
for Donna Gosine
intermittently
suspended.
and a stubborn,
it wasn't Hell-flame
that tormented
But lucky
16
floor
Idiopathic:
than you
AMERICANAnlElST -
MARCH2007
Yes
MARCH Lffi7
AMERICANATHEIST
17
~ixMyth~Ho~utHth~i~tI~a~h~r~
by David Layton
1925,
n
high school biology teacher John Scopes was put on
trial for teaching the theory of evolution in contradiction to
Tennessee law. In 1940, City College of New York infamously
denied Bertrand Russell a faculty post because of public outcry
over his Atheism. Vashti McCollum lost her job at the University of
Illinois, Champaign, in 1947 when she challenged in court a religious
program forced upon children at her son's elementary school. These
famous examples of coercive religion applied in American public
schools, primary, secondary, and higher, ought to be mere notes in
intellectual history. Instead, even in the twenty-first century, in both
small and large ways, freethinking and Atheist teachers pay the price
for their dissent from the majority religious views.
For six years, I taught various subjects, primarily English, at
an exclusive private high school in southern California. This was a
secular high school, founded by an Atheist who died in the 1970s.
His successor, the principal of the school, was not an Atheist, but neither was he conspicuously religious. During the job interview I had
with him, the subject of religion never came up. Neither did it seem
much of a concern until late in my second year of teaching there. I
cannot now recall the original subject of the conversation, but some
time in its course I mentioned that I was an Atheist. Surprise crossed
his face, and without hesitation he blurted, "I wish I had known that
before I hired you, or I never would have hired you." I did not directly respond to this remark, but one can image my own surprise,
since this principal deeply admired the school's Atheist founder. It
became clear, though, that he considered the founder to be an aberration among Atheists; that, in his mind, Atheists were most probably
an unsavory and untrustworthy lot; and that in hiring me he had
taken a great unknown risk with his precious students.
The issue never became contentious between us, and in the
six years I worked there, I demonstrated enough character, sense, and
teaching ability to become head teacher (among a small faculty). To
his credit, the principal would sometimes tell me that is was "good"
for students to be exposed to alternative views such as mine. Nevertheless, I got a clear sense that he probably thought of me as an
exception among Atheists, and most likely deep down not an Atheist
at all. For instance, during one lunchtime conversation with a Christian teacher who would later study for the ministry, he said that they
had to see what they could do to bring me "to the Lord." In another
conversation he told me that I would "come around" when my death
was near. I resisted the temptation of pointing out that a deathbed
conversion is no proof of faith, just of desperation. These and many
similar instances demonstrate, in their benign and relatively harmless
way, some of the discrimination that Atheist, Skeptical, and Agnostic
teachers face every day in America.
18
AMERICAN ATHEISf
MARCH 2007
Imagine for a minute similar statements made in similar circumstances to a Jewish or gay teacher. Imagine the principal making
half-serious remarks to bring me around to what he perceives to
be the "right" way of thinking or behaving if I asked to go home
early on Fridays for Sabbath, or brought my boyfriend to graduation. Jews, gays, women, Blacks, and all sorts of minority and disempowered groups have some kinds of legal recourse when they are
pressured to be other than what they are or have the right to be.
Atheists have but one, the establishment clause of the First Amendment to the Constitution, which sadly does not often extend into
the private sector.
Additionally, the situation for Atheists is somewhat different
from what it is for these other minority and disempowered groups.
The other groups have various kinds of legal status, which one can
see on government forms and in the laws, rules, and regulations at all
levels of government. Atheism has almost no such comparable status. Furthermore, for many of these other groups, the difference that
separates them from the perceived norm or preferred group of white
middle- and upper-class Christian males is physically obvious. No
one gives serious consideration to the idea of making a Black man
White through persuasion. While some hold that gays might be persuaded to heterosexuality, this idea has largely been debunked and is
held mostly by fundamentalist religionists.
The difference that separates Atheists and other nonbelievers
from the religionist majority is a set of ideas. These ideas are widely
misunderstood and misrepresented in popular media and especially
in places of worship. So, Atheism is treated in part as if it were a
kind of political affiliation like being a Democrat or Republican, and
thus come the regular attempts to persuade Atheists to abandon their
views. However, Atheism is also treated as a kind of aberrant behavior, a mental disease, or worse, an insidious underground, shadowy
movement bent on "taking over" the country and destroying treasured American values.
Because Atheists are so generally mistrusted and their views so
thoroughly misunderstood, Atheists are often treated in exactly the
fashion that minorities have been historically treated. The attitude
is, "it is fine to think that such a thing might actually exist, but I
wouldn't want one in my neighborhood." Atheists get dubious and
shady motivations attributed to them. If the Atheist is brought closer to home, that is into contact with the religionists' children, then
visceral anger often results. I was relatively lucky that my employer
could see that I was not the evil monster that he worried I might
have been. I was also lucky that, though I never hid my Atheism and
always explained it when students asked whether I believed in god, no
parents objected to my teaching their children.
Many teachers are not so lucky. Some have been hounded and
vilified for being Atheists, while others have suffered from the invisible hand of discrimination. Even I felt pressure to keep my convictions to myself. Mainstream teachers could declare that they were
Catholic or Jewish without ever feeling the need to "explain" it. On
the other hand, I knew that I always would have to explain it, and
sometimes the need to explain it gets tiresome. Additionally, while it
was perfectly acceptable for students, faculty, and administration to
try to persuade me away from my views, it was not conversely acceptable for me to persuade others to my views.
I now teach at various colleges as an adjunct "professor."
Though colleges, except for the private religious ones, are supposed
to be open to public debate on all issues, and welcoming of diverse
points of view, I do feel some fear for my job, enough that I keep my
Atheism to myself. The reason is that often I receive papers in which
blind religious indoctrination has been substituted for any kind of
thought. The student writers assume that anyone reading their papers
shares their extreme religious views. They quote and often misquote
the Bible as sole evidence and proof. I have to tell them on their essays
that belief is not proof, that not everyone thinks as they do, and that
biblical authority is not universally accepted.
If these students knew that I was an Atheist, it would be certain that at least one of them by now would claim that I was persecuting him or her, that the low grade was the result of a personal bias or
vendetta against Christianity and not the result of bad writing. As an
adjunct, I do not have the luxury of tenure to protect me. I teach on
a per/class contractual basis, and it is easy enough for a school simply
not to renew the contract, which schools often do with adjunct faculty that become "trouble" in one way or another. As long as the students do not know that I am an Atheist, any complaint can be turned
aside on the basis that the students just did not write well.
My fear is not unjustified. Alan Dershowitz has noted that
even tenured skeptical and nonbelieving professors fear publicizing
their views ("Taking Disbelief Out Of The Closet" FreeInquiry Summer 1999). In May, 2005, sociology professor Timothy Shortell was
forced to refuse becoming chair of the sociology department at Brooklyn College because of a website he ran that harshly criticized blind
religious devotion (Jaschik, Scott. "Withdrawal At Brooklyn" Inside
Higher Ed, 8 June 2005). Shortell's example shows that professors
critical of religion need to hold in their criticisms, since their advancement, perhaps their jobs, is at stake. The same fear for one's job probably affects even more greatly Atheist teachers in primary and secondary schools, where outraged parents can wield enormous power.
Examples of such discrimination exist, though often the discrimination is hidden behind plausible-sounding excuses. In 2005,
the Chicago Tribune reported that Richard Sherman signed a contract for a job at Schaumburg High School, but that the contract
was rescinded, most probably because of Richard's father, Chicagoarea Atheist and activist Robert Sherman. The elder Sherman has for
many years made local government officials uncomfortable with his
challenges of various theistic activities. He has, among other things,
petitioned the Chicago city council to remove "under god" from
the Pledge of Allegiance and has pointed out that the same words
in Lincoln's Gettysburg Address were not in Lincoln's hand-written
version of the speech and were probably added by news writers after the event (Cline, Austin. "Atheist's Son Denied A Job Because of
Father?" http://atheism.about.com/b/al173347.htm,
29 May 2005).
A reasonable speculation about Richard Sherman's case is that the
school board feared givihg a prominent Atheist critic an avenue into
the schools.
AMERlCANAniElST
19
AMERiaN Anrasr
MARCH7f.JJ7
Americans don't want an Atheist teaching their kids. I'm sorry if you
happen to be in the minority on this issue and have radical views" O.
Coyle, qtd. Austin Cline, "Responses to Case of Atheist's Son Being
Denied a Teaching Job," http://arheism.about.com/b/ a/ 174609 .htrn,
08 June 2005).
One can see rhe barely hidden desire for an American theocracy in such remarks. Ordinary Americans holding up Saudi Arabia
as a social exemplar should frighten any free rhinker, not just Arheists.
Atheist teachers constantly face students and parents who think that
the U.S. is a "Christian" country, that "Christian" principles should
run the republic, and rhat non-Christians of any sort should just give
up rheir ways and join the majority. Recent calls for a holy war against
Islam by conservative Christians such as Ann Coulter, George W
Bush, and Pat Robertson only fuel the misperception that America's
government should be a fundamentalist theocracy. This attitude is
perhaps the most dangerous to the Atheist teacher who brings open
debate on religious issues into the classroom.
5. When Atheist teachers teach, they are "teaching" Atheism.
Given the previous four myths, one can see that myth number
five is inevitable. An Atheist cabal bent on destruction of Christian
society and using biology classes as a pretext to preach the gospel of
Atheism in rhe form of Darwin's rheories must be after converts. Here
is just one example of this line of nonsensical rhought. The story involves the National Association of Biology Teachers in Canada, who,
in rhe 1990s had described evolution as an "unsupervised, impersonal"
process, even though rhey also specified that "natural" does not mean
"without god." Under pressure from Theists, rhe association changed
rhe wording. From rhis, Canadian Christian commentator and journalist Denyse O'Leary curiously concludes rhat, "So accustomed were
they to teaching Arheism, one must infer, rhat it had never occurred to
rhem that they might be challenged on rhe point" ("Teaching Arheism
At Public Expense?" http://post-Darwinist.blogspot.com/2005/09/
teaching-atheism-at-public-expense.htrnl. 11 Sep 2005). Another example of rhe dangerous non sequitur rhat Arheist teachers teach Atheism comes from John Baumgartner of the Los Alamos National Laboratory, in response to a 1996 decision in New Mexico to teach only
evolution in biology classes. Baumgartner states, "mandating only the
evolutionary perspective, as the current policy does, sends the message
to Atheist teachers, not just in science but in all subjects, that rhey
have full legal authority and approval to indoctrinate their students
without restraint in an Arheist worldview" ("The Case For Teaching
Creationism." The Los Alamos Monitor, 23 Aug 1996).
God's Brothel
by Andrea Moore-Emmett
The extortion of sex for salvation
in contemporary Mormon and
Christian fundamentalist polygamy
and the stories of 18 women who
escaped.
stock # 5905
$16.00
(AA Members Price: $14.40)
MARCH"2fXJ7
AMERICAN
ATHEIST
21
This belief that some teachers are teaching Atheism goes back
at least as far as the 1925 Scopes Trial. William Jennings Bryan, in his
pamphlet "The Menace of Evolution," equates the teaching of evolution with the teaching of Agnosticism and Atheism, and claims that
biology teachers were substituting Darwin for the Bible. Eighty years
of biology classes later, and there is not a single piece of evidence that
supports the notion that teaching evolution corrupts either the religious faith or moral values of young minds. Yet, religionists continue
to make the same counter-factual claim that Bryan had made.
If religionists truly believed the "logic" of their own position,
they would have to argue that a Catholic teacher teaches Catholicism, that a Jewish teacher teaches Judaism, that a Muslim teacher
teaches Islam, no matter what the actual subject of the class. As an
English teacher, I have to understand and demonstrate the Christian
philosophies that form the majority of Western literature. I should
not and do not spend my time trying to prove that such philosophies
are wrong. And, in my experience, most supposedly devout Christian
students, high school and college, have almost no understanding of
the ethos of great Christian writers such as Milton, Donne, or Hawthorne, for instance. Instead of teaching Atheism, I spend much time
actually teaching Christianity.
NEWS ITEM:
22
AMERJCAN
ATHEISt -
MARCH '2fJJ7
ter to prevailing dogmas, they risk ridicule, harassment, their reputations, and their jobs.
Nevertheless, hiding one's beliefs will not make the problem go
away. The growing influence of religious extremism both in America
and worldwide makes it necessary for more dissenters to voice their
opinions and stand up to ideological inquisition. There are things
that Atheist and other secular Humanist teachers can do without
turning the classroom into an ideological battleground.
First, science teachers need to insist that science and only science belongs in a science class. If school boards and administrators
create policies that require science teachers to say that nonscientific
theology disguised as science, such as "intelligent design," are coequal theories with scientific ones, then teachers should say "no." Second, when asked about their religious beliefs, teachers should explain
those beliefs. Even when one gets tired of explaining one's beliefs,
one should still explain them. Misunderstandings about both Atheism and Skepticism of religious claims can be cleared only when more
people know what Atheism and Skepticism truly are. These beliefs
are sturdy enough that one need not denigrate any religion in order
to show the validity of Atheism and Skepticism.
Third, those teachers inclined to writing should publish writings about Atheism and Skepticism. Publications both in print and
on the web help to educate the general public about Atheism and
Skepticism, and help to build a network community of Atheists and
Skeptics. Furthermore, such publications provide evidence should
teachers be dismissed for their views.
Fourth, when students state blatant falsehoods about religion
or Atheism, teachers should not be afraid to point out the falsehood
and explain what makes it wrong. In one college class I taught, a
born-again Christian openly stated that Catholics were not Christians because they "worshipped the Pope." As a teacher, I could not
let such a falsehood go unchallenged. Another student wrote on a
discussion board for an online class that evolution was the last desperate argument of Atheists. I had to point out, on the discussion board,
that many biologists are religious, as was Darwin himself Letting
such statements go uncorrected would have served only the cause
of ignorance and may have given the impression that the instructor
condones such beliefs.
Despite threats to their reputations and employment, Atheist
teachers should not, as most nonbelieving politicians do, hide their
credos, nor pretend to a religiosity they do not have. Such inauthentic
behavior makes Atheism seem shameful and undermines its credibility as an intellectual principle. The most valuable lesson Atheist teachers can teach is that they have the courage of their convictions.
Dr.Shapiro is an Atheist and podiatrist in private practice in Tucson, Arizona. Dr. Shapiro was born and raised in
New York City and completed his pre-medical training at
Columbia University after obtaining bachelor's and master's degrees from the City University of New York. After
9raduation (with honors) from the California College of
Podiatric Medicine in San Francisco (associated with UCSF
College of Medicine), he was fortunate to have been selected to complete a two-year intensive surgical residency
at Northlake Hospital in Chicago. This program was considered, at that time, to be one of the finest programs of
its kind in the country.
In 1980, Dr. Shapiro came to Tucson and assumed the
practice of Dr. Felton Gamble who retired after 29 years.
Dr.Shapiro is one of only a few Tucson podiatrists who
is board certified by both the American Boards of Podiatric Surgery and Podiatric Orthopedics. He has served as an
oral examiner for their national examinations. Dr. Shapiro
has lectured at the local, state and national levels on podiatric surgery and practice management. He has a special
interest in the management of diabetic and arthritic conditions. Dr. Shapiro believes firmly in the Latin expression:
"Qui amat suam propriam, laborum ayam bene faclt," ...
which means "He who loves his work, does it well:'
MARCH2007 -
AMERICANATHEIST
23
culture watch
raiseJesus and get ready to kick some godless, feminist, one- publisher is marketing games based on the "Veggie Tales" series of
world-government, secularist, abortionist, and, oh yes! ho- Christian videos for children. Another is pitching "Bibleman: A Fight
mosexual, Antichrist-serving butt! And have fun in the profor Faith," about a superhero who stands up for the word of God with
his sidekicks Cypher and Biblegirl.
cess.... That seems to be subtext in a new Christian-themed
video game. Dubbed "Left Behind: Eternal Forces," and based on
Eternal Forces is also designed to reach beyond the core marthe popular series of books by evangelist Tim laHaye and co-author
ket of evangelical churches and readers of the Left Behind book series
which has sold over 65 million copies.
Jerry Jenkins, the game allows players to join up with heavily armed
Christians fighting it out with a demonic opposition in the streets of
"The reason I think this game has a chance is that it's not parNew York City, or even switch roles for a violent walk on the wild ticularly preachy," said securities analyst Michael Pachter. "I will say
and evil side. It takes place following "The Rapture" when thousands
some of the dialogue is pretty lame-people saying, 'Praise the Lord'
of people who are right with Jehovah are whisked up to heaven, leav- after they blow away the bad guys. I think they're overdoing it a bit.
But the message is OK."
ing behind everyone else, to suffer under the boot of the Antichrist,
who unleashes his own reign of terror,
the Tribulation. It has just about everything from constant frenetic action to
Based on the popular "Left Behind" series, this Christian video
hyper-violence (except sex) that gamers
and video game developers consider de
game mixes Dispensationalist Religion with graphic violence.
rigueur in order to compete in a multiShould we be concerned, or is pop-culture co-opting the Apocalypse?
billion-dollar marketplace.
"Left Behind: Eternal Forces"
was unveiled in May at the annual
Electronic Entertainment Expo, and caused an immediate sensation.
"Left Behind: Eternal Forces" takes place in New York City
"It has the Antichrist, the end of the world, the apocalypse," gushed where a Christian militia (the Tribulation Force) battles with the
co-creator Jeffrey S. Frichner. "It's got all the Christian stuff, and it's Global Community Peacekeepers of the U.N. who are under the
control of the Antichrist. Thousands have already been raptured,
still got all the cool stuff."
but many more not selected in this bizarre cosmic lottery are "left
Troy Lyndon, the CEO of Left Behind Games, was boasting
about the bottom line. "Our research has shown this market to be behind" as human history enters its final days. Players take on the
role of real-time battlefield generals controlling virtual armies. Bible
huge," he told reporters. "It's been three years in the making by more
than 50 developers on three continents. The cost was significant, but verse and inspirational music are included as players work their way
we are not at liberty to disclose details."
up the increasingly difficult levels of the game. Killing an opponent
Indeed, "Eternal Forces" is by the far the most aggressive and
results in a loss of spiritual goodness, and must be compensated with
well-funded foray Lyndon's firm or any other Christian-themed com- prayer. Angels and demons intervene. The game skillfully blends the
fast-paced action of attacking helicopters, tanks and guns with apocapany has made into the tempestuous waters of video gaming. Game
wonks and "Left Behind" enthusiasts are comparing it to hits like lyptic spirituality.
Early reviews of "Eternal Forces" give the video game high
"Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas" which has sold over 5.1 million
copies. In contrast, earlier religion-based videos have achieved only marks for sophisticated production values. Lyndon, who worked on
mediocre sales. Digital Praise, another developer of Christian games, over 50 other video game projects, has found apparent success in
shipped a reported 30,000 copies of its "Dance Praise." The anticdeveloping a product for a wide, game-savvy audience blending vioipated success of the new Left Behind game offering, though, has lence with Christian prophecy. According to the Times feature, he
Bible-believing developers chomping at the bit. LA Times Reporter
left the gaming world in 1999 to join the Jesus Film Project, which
Dawn Chmielewski noted:
produced a two-hour docudrama about the life of the alleged Jesus
Christ, and at the behest of his wife returned "to his game-making
Eternal Forces is part of a new wave of religious games comroots to turn the 'Left Behind' books into a form of electronic evaning out at a time when the mainstream industry faces increasing
gelism aimed at teens."
criticism that its products celebrate misogynistic mayhem. Another
24
AMERICAN ATHEIST
MARCH 2007
AMERICANATHEIST
25
AMERICANATHEIST -
MARCH2fJJ7
Wh~r~Hr~Ih~lramiti~nalf~~~il~(
by Jim Strayer
earMcCluskey,
I often get this question from people who have never read a collegebiology or geology textbook. They usually
have never visited the public library or the Internet either.
Your question would have been better if you would have told me
the resources that you used to come to a conclusion that no transitional
forms exist. I can't imagine it coming from any scientific source.
It so happens that there are hundreds of transitional forms found
in fossilsand many in plants and animals living today.
Did you know that alligatorsare more closelyrelated to birds than
to reptiles?Their hearts, brains, DNA, and behavior are more bird like
than reptilian. It takes scientific study to discover these things,
I can only assume that you asked the question because you do not
believe that evolution is the force that is responsible for the diversity of
life on earth. If that is the case I have a couple of questions for you.
First some information:
There have been over one thousand human genes isolated that
cause disease in humans. Examples would be albinism, which occurs in
all vertebrate animals. In humans it occurs once in ever seventeen thousand births. One in ever seventy-fine humans carries the gene. One in
ever eight hundred births is a Down Syndrome baby. It is simple math,
inherited human defects occur because the genes are there in a specific
number.
My question for you is, how did they get there?
Either these genes evolved or they were placed in humans by a
creator to cause very serious problems and much misery.
There are severalparasitic worms that infect only humans. One
example is Onchocerciasis (River Blindness). This very painful and
blinding disease could have evolved, or it could have been designed by
the creator to cause untold pain in innocent children. Your choice.
The leaders on the intelligent design movement use the compli-
Mississippi
Attorney Needed
is looking for an attorney in
Mississippi to help us with a very important
prayer lawsuit. This attorney would not have
to litigate the case,just be our local counsel
of record. If anyone in Mississippi knows any
attorney in any area of law who would be
willing to help us in a marginal way please
contact us at 908-276-7300 Thank-you.
AMERICAN ATHEISTS
q_._%_%%_~
~~~~~,~~~~
_~,~'
AMERICAN ATHEIST
27
news
Pope Warns
Of Threats
To Christmas
Celebration From
Secular Trends
by Daniela Petroff
Associated Press Writer
VATICAN
CITY (AP)-Pope Benedict
XVI urged Christians on Wednesday to defend the spirit of Christmas
against secular trends during his last
general audience before the holiday.
He wished the several thousand
pilgrims and tourists gathered in a
Vatican auditorium decorated with
Christmas trees a "Happy Christmas" in seven languages and told
them that "false prophets continue
to offer cheap salvation which ends
up in deep delusions."
"It is the duty of Christians to
spread through a witness of life the
truth of Christmas, which Christ
brings to every man and woman of
good will."
Throughout the audience, choral groups sang Christmas carols,
including "Silent Night," a favorite in the pope's native Germany.
Shepherds from Italy's Abruzzi
mountains, in their traditional furtrimmed costumes, played Italian
carols on their bagpipes.
During his speech, Benedict also
posed the question of the relevance
of religion in modern society, one of
his leading themes.
"Today, many consider God irrelevant. Even believers sometimes
seek tempting but illusory shortcuts
to happiness. And yet perhaps even
because of this confusion humanity
seeks a savior, and awaits the coming
of Christ," the pope said.
Although he warned against
being distracted by what he called
the "trappings of Christmas," Benedict offered thanks for the 11O-foot
Christmas tree set up in St. Peter's
Square, and the one in his private
apartment in the Vatican, both gifts
from the mountains of Calabria in
southern Italy.
He also encouraged the custom
of setting up nativity scenes in the
home.
"It is my hope that such an important element (of Christmas) not
28
AMERICANATHEIST -
MARCH2007
Cobb School
Board Abandons
Evolution Sticker
Case
by Doug Gross
Associated Press Writer
ATLANTA
(AP) -A suburban Atlanta
school board that put stickers in its
high school science books that said
evolution is "a theory, not a fact"
abandoned the legal battle Tuesday
after four years.
The Cobb County board agreed
in federal court never to use a similar
sticker or ro undermine the teaching
of evolution in science classes.
In return, the parents who sued
over the stickers agreed to drop 'all
legal action.
"We certainly think that it's a
win not just for our clients but for all
students in Cobb County and, really,
all residents of Georgia," said Beth
Littrell of the ACLU of Georgia.
The school board placed the
stickers inside the front cover of biology books in 2002 after a group of
parents complained that evolution
was being taught to the exclusion
of other theories, including a literal
reading of the Biblical story of creation.
University Of
Texas Workers
Dismissed After
Praying In Office
Cubicle
by Matt Curry
Associated Press Writer
DALLAS (AP)-Two
former employees of the University of Texas at
Arlington said they were fired after
praying over another staff member's
cubicle and anointing it with olive
oil.
Evelyne M. Shatkin, an administrative assistant, and Linda Shifflett, a development funds assistant,
claimed in a lawsuit filed Tuesday in
federal court that their termination
constitutes religious discrimination.
The suit was filed by the Liberty Legal Institute of Plano.
"UTA should be ashamed for
punishing these two women for simply praying after work on their own
time," said Hiram Sasser, director of
litigation for the firm, which files
lawsuits over religious issues.
The university released a statement saying its decision had been
upheld by the Texas Workforce
Commission and the Texas Equal
Employment
Opportunity
CommiSSIOn.
"UT Arlington respects our
employee's rights to their religious
beliefs and does not discriminate on
the basis of religion," the statement
said. "We cannot comment on personnel matters or cases in litigation.
However, the accusations presented
in this lawsuit are a gross distortion
of the truth."
The suit claims that a male
worker was having problems with
another employee and shared the
information with ShifRett. ShifRett,
Shatkin and the man stayed after
work on March 3 to pray for the
woman, who was on vacation. The
three met at the woman's cubicle
about 5:30 p.m., believing no one
else was there.
news
Shawn prayed for the situation,
and according to her religious tradition, dabbed olive oil on the door
frame of the cubicle. The oil left no
mark and did not damage the cubicle,
according to the suit.
The university dismissed Shifflett
and Shawn and denied their internal
appeal. Amy J. Schultz, assistant vice
president for development, said in a
March 24 letter that the women's
behavior was unbecoming for a UTA
staff member.
"More
specifically, praying,
shouting and/or chanting over a coworkers personal and professional
belongings without her knowledge
and consent constitutes harassment
of a fellow co-worker," she wrote. "In
addition, rubbing this co-worker's cubicle with oil is blatant disregard for
university property, both of which are
identified as behavior that is grounds
for dismissal..."
The suit also alleges age and sex
discrimination, saying that the university took no action against the other employee involved in the prayer, "a
male under the age of 40."
u.s. Criticizes
Egyptian Court
Decision To Ban
Bahai Listing On
Identity Cards
WASHINGTON(AP)- THE U.S. State
Department
has condemned an
Egyptian court ruling that denies
Bahais the right to have their faith
recognized on official identification
documents.
Rejecting a lower court decision
favorable to Bahais, the Supreme
Administrative Court ruled that the
Egyptian constitution
recognizes
33rdANNUAL
NATlONALCONVEN11ON
of AMERICAN ATHEISTS
APRIL6-8,2007
SEATTLE,WASHINGTON
Make Your Plans Now!
Whatever your interest - we've got it covered!
AMERICANATHEISTS- Ellen Johnson, president
American
Atheists
RELIGION& MENTAL ILLNESS- Dr. Henry Jones
CHRISTIANATONEMENT- Robert M. Price
STATE-CHURCHSEPARATIONLAWSUITS- Edwin Kagin
LEGISLATIVEISSUES& POLITICS- Peter Nuhn
HUMOROUSLOOK ATTHE BIOLOGICALIMPLICATIONSOFTHEOLD TESTAMENTJESUS
- Frank Zindler
INTELLIGENTDESIGN DEBATE- Dr. Massimo Pigliucci
"BLASPHEMY"GAME - David Fitzgerald
COMEDIAN & STAROF MOVIES AND TELEVISION- Julia Sweeney
FILM - "The Root of All Evil" by Richard Dawkins
MEETINGOF MILITARYATHEISTS
MEETINGOF AFFILIATEDORGANIZATIONS
PANEL DISCUSSION,MEET OUR STATEDIRECTORS
TRAIN TRIP,WINE TASTING,MUSIC & DANCING
(Speakers are still being added to the program.)
The program
begins at 9:30 am on Friday and Saturday.
Program SubjectTo Change
MARCH2fJJ7 -
AMERICANATHEIST
29
M~ml~vesY~u~~Much ...
AMERlCAN ATHElSf
MARCH
2fXJ7
David Newton
ntill joined the military, despite having no real
belief in a god, I clung to the safe idea that I was
an Agonistic. It was not until later in life, after
several years in the military, that I realized that
Agnosticism (in my case) was a coward's position. Knowing I was not a coward, I changed to a complete
and total acceptance of my Atheism. The acceptance became very liberating and I saw the world more clearly. I finally
understood our country's Founding Fathers and their desire
to push religion from the government. When listening to
others I could recognize their hypocrisy and muddled
thoughts. It was, as if a great space had been opened
in my brain for many more thoughts and ideas. It
was freedom.
During boot camp, there were only two things
you could do on Sunday morning. One was to go
to chapel and try to catch some shuteye in the back
pew. The other was peel potatoes and/or clean the
mess hall. Given the alternatives,l chose the chapel
and a nap. In fact, upon entry to the military during
the issuing of dog tags, I was asked for my religion for
inclusion on the tag. My answer of "None"was unacceptable to them, and I was made to claim "Protestant"
(as my religion).
When I became an officer I had many debates with a
member of the CIA and other government employees (not
military) who constantly professed how blessed they are. One
day I had about as much of this "blessing" as I could stand
and I mouthed off to one of them. I explained to him how I
thought he used religion to hide his sexual perversion and
if he really were what he professed he would be more
concerned with the ills and hardships of others in the
world, especially the third world.
I made some very unflattering comments
about his use of religion. At the time, his adult
daughter was suing him in court for her early
years of child abuse. He fell against the wall
behind him as if I had hit him, even though I did
not. But it was within the possible alternative
outcomes I was considering (Just give me an
excuse you religious fraud!).
I had no idea how this would play with
the leaders cfthe organization but I got a hint
when a lead government engineer started
coming around regularly to talk on a wideranging number of topics. It seemed that
they had accepted my "outburst" but they