Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
d) The learning of a,b,c,d is very important for the child at pre school level. In the Montessori method, the
language program does not start with a,b,c,d, so its inefficient .
Montessori method do not teach children the letter sounds in alphabetical order. Instead teach them in small
groupings of letters, starting with consonants most often seen that are very different from one another with one
vowel sound incorporated into each group. (such as a, b, g. m)
This way the children learn the sounds independently from similar sounds or similarly shaped letters (letters like
b and d are presented in different groups, as are p and q, as are the short vowel sounds i and e). Later children
are introduced to the "long" vowel sounds and the situations where they come about as well as the differences in
the hard and soft c and g. It is at this time, that, if needed children are given work to compare similar sounding
or looking letters if they still need help in differentiating between the
It is true, Montessorians do not begin the teaching of reading by teaching children the names of the letters. This
is because they then begin to confuse the letter name with the letter sound. A situation that becomes even more
confusing because sometimes certain letters do make the sound of their names, and other times they do not.
More so other letter never make the sound of their names. For example: when they see an "A" it sometimes
makes the "A" sound, but just as often it makes the"a" sound as in apple, or the "ah" sound, as in tuba, or even
the "uh" sound in an unstressed syllable as in Australia. Additionally, the letter "B", never makes the
"beeeeeeeee" sound, just as a "J" never makes a "Jaaaaaaaaaa" sound.
This becomes confusing to a child than to learn the names of the letters first and does not easily segue into the
teaching of reading. Because of this Montessorians forgo the teaching of letter names at first and focus on the
predominate sounds of the letters.
Answer 2
Steps taken at primary level to change the present system of education for better:The nation needs an education system that excites and stimulates children, providing them with the learning
they need - and deserve - to fulfill their potential. This means providing a curriculum of practical and vocational
learning alongside theoretical study.
This need for change has never been more pressing. It is not due to the fault of any individual, any school or
even any one political party but due to the simple fact the world has changed - and our education system has not
changed fast enough. Indeed, it is largely based on a system developed over a century ago; a factory
manufacturing model where children are placed on a learning conveyor belt, then sorted, packaged and labelled
according to their so-called intelligence.
However, in this day and age there is no excuse for such a top-down, one-size-fits-all education system that does
not enable all children to thrive in their own way. We must recognise that young people are individuals with
different talents and dreams. As such, not all children learn in the same way. We need to move towards a
system of mass customisation, based on a strong common core of essential skills and knowledge, which allows
young people to develop their own particular talents and aspirations.
We must support young people in discovering what they enjoy and are good at - and who they want to be in
life. And we must encourage and support teachers and schools in responding to these different needs. Young
people will learn if they see learning as important, meaningful and worthwhile.
The rich and upper middle class in cities find decent quality private schools to send their children to.
Even in these schools, getting a pass in the exams is the priority, not learning. Even these schools
fail in teaching various arts, and in particular common sense to children.
Both the private and government schools in smaller towns and villages are uniformly pathetic.
afford that to their children. Those with money can always opt for their favourite private school, and feed their
own children. Alternately, some rich may decide to send their children to the govt. schools.
2. Govt. schools should be run by private entities/entrepreneurs.
It is very doubtful if the government can manage hiring qualified teachers and provide quality education to
children. Like in the USA, the government can opt for building the schools and make them available to private
companies on a long-term lease, based on auction. The organization that comes up with the lowest bid and
agrees to maintain the best quality education would be chosen to run each school in each locality.
We need to introduce a concept of 'education credit'. It is an amount equal to the average cost incurred in
teaching a child in the privately run Govt. schools. This education credit is made available to every child. The
child can either avail of the education by exchanging this credit in the Govt. owned and private operated
school, or cash this portion against the fees and other costs incurred by them in a completely private school.
This way, the tax payer does not have to feel miffed that his her money is used only to train OTHER children.
Panchayat and municipalities must own and manage the school premises and oversee the operation of the
private entities running the school.
In the Preliminary Exercises, the child learns the basic movements of all societies such as pouring, folding,
and carrying.
In the Applied Exercises, the child learns about the care and maintenance that helps every day life. These
activities are, for example, the care of the person (i.e the washing of the hand) and the care of the
environment (i.e dusting a table or outdoor sweeping).
In the Grace and Courtesy Exercises, the children work on the interactions of people to people.
In the Control of Movement Exercises, the child learns about his own movements and learns how to refine
his coordination through such activities as walking on the line.
advanced level. For instance, one illustration of Rote learning can be observed in preparing quickly for exams, a
technique which may be colloquially referred to as "cramming".
Rote learning is the memorization of information based on repetition. The two biggest examples of rote learning
are the alphabet and numbers. Slightly more complicated examples include multiplication tables and spelling
words. At the high school level, the elements and their chemical numbers must be memorized by rote. Many
times, teachers use rote learning without even realizing they do so.
Is rote learning an outdated technique or is there a valid place for its use in the classroom today? Increasingly,
rote learning is being abandoned for newer techniques such as associative learning, meta cognition, and critical
thinking instead of being used as a functional foundation to higher levels of learning.
Its always useful to apply meaningful relationships to basic skills. At the end of the day, however, rote learning
plays a bigger role than most teachers would like to recognize in todays learning climate.
The difference between memory and intelligence
The mental ability to memorize is often used as an indicator of intelligence. No doubt, the two are strongly
linked, but memory is not always a reliable indicator of intelligence. Working memory does not directly affect
the level of intelligence of a student.
Most of the time, a deficit in working memory is due to the structure of learning. Think of working memory as a
filing cabinet. If each piece of information has a separate file, finding the information becomes difficult. If
factors such as stress, lack of sleep, and distractions are involved, finding the information is even harder.
Instead, effective memorization involves categorization of the information and sections within sections of the
filing cabinet.
Memory is not a strong indicator of intelligence. Instead, it is linked to interaction of environmental factors and
training.
Why rote learning is useful
As an alternative approach to subject areas that require memorization with disdain and conflict, teachers can
build higher-level critical thinking skills with a rote learning as the foundation. Thats not to say that there arent
some problems with rote learning. Obviously, rote learning is not beneficial for the student and promotes
disengagement in the classroom.
Not all rote learning has to be approached with a sheet of loose leaf and writing the same word or mathematical
equation over and over again until the students hand cramps. This can result in a loss of focus where the student
starts to challenge themselves on how quickly they can get it over with or how legible their handwriting is. This
is probably not the goal that the teacher had in mind.
When trying to teach something as fundamental as basic math and literacy and the lesson turns into boredom
and dread, then something has gone wrong.
When is there a problem with rote learning?
Rote memorization becomes a problem when its the main focus of the classroom.. When the majority of the
students day is spent on repetition, the foundation for learning becomes shaky.
When the role of rote memorization is an end in itself, instead of a means to an end, rote memorization fails as a
building block to critical thinking.
Of course in the early stages, the stage of actually memorizing the material, it is an end in itself. The end being
that the students gets the information memorized so that they can move into concepts and application. The
longer view is that the information acquired by rote, is the house of higher-level learning.
Once students have these down and memorized, they can more easily combine them and use them in their
thinking. Otherwise, they just have to pause and use a calculator or computer, which will really slows things
downnot to mention disengages and distracts the student.
At the end of a learning experience, you can assess your own learning outcomes by using two basic kinds of
tests: retention tests, which seek to evaluate if you remember what was taught, and transfer tests, which you
must apply what has been learned to a novel situation (Mayer, 1995). If you have not learned, you would have
poor retention and poor transfer performance. If you have learned in a rote way, you probably have good
retention, but would not know how to transfer. If you have learned in a meaningful way, it is likely that you
have both good retention and good transfer.
As this model is developmental, it is often shown as an upward spiral rather than a circle, implying that the
result of the complete cycle is at a higher level than its starting point. Hence following an experience or after
gathering information, there should be a consolidation that draws you to actively explore in your mind the new
information and relate it to previous knowledge, before moving on to new topics. Wherever you start on this
cycle, it is important not to miss out any stages. Learning opportunities will be wasted if you:
Have no theoretical basis or prior concepts with which to make sense of your experience or to devise
action plans;
Are not involved in setting up your own action plans, but simply carry out the directions of others (e.g.
teachers or peers);
Carry out activities without being aware (not thinking) of what is going on; and
do not reflect upon your experiences.
It can be changed by:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.