International Journal of Fuzzy Logic Systems (IJFLS) Vol.4, No.

4, October 2014

TWO NEW OPERATOR DEFINED OVER

INTERVAL VALUED INTUITIONISTIC FUZZY
SETS
S. Sudharsan1, 2 and D. Ezhilmaran3
1

Research Scholar, Bharathiar University, Coimbatore -641046, India.

Department of Mathematics, C. Abdul Hakeem College of Engineering & Technology,
Melvisharam,Vellore 632 509, Tamilnadu, India.
3
School of Advanced Sciences, VIT University, Vellore 632 014, Tamilnadu, India.

ABSTRACT
IVIFS
 with  and Multiplication of an IVIFS
 with the natural number are proved.


In this paper, two new Operator defined over IVIFSs were introduced, which will be Multiplication of an


Key Words:
Intuitionistic fuzzy set, Interval valued Intuitionistic fuzzy sets, Operations over interval valued
intuitionistic fuzzy sets.

AMS CLASSIFICATION: 03E72

1. INTRODUCTION
In 1965, Fuzzy sets theory was proposed by L. A. Zadeh[18]. In 1986, the concept of
intuitionistic fuzzy sets (IFSs), as a generalization of fuzzy set were introduced by K.
Atanassov[1]. After the introduction of IFS, many researchers have shown interest in the IFS
theory and applied in numerous fields, such as pattern recognition, machine learning, image
processing, decision making and etc... In 1994, new operations defined over the intuitionistic
fuzzy sets was proposed by K. Atanassov[3]. In 2000, Some operations on intuitionistic fuzzy
sets were proposed by Supriya Kumar De, Ranjit Biswas and Akhil Ranjan Roy[12]. In 2001, an
application of intuitionistic fuzzy sets in medical diagnosis were proposed by Supriya Kumar De,
Ranjit Biswas and Akhil Ranjan Roy [13]. In 2006, n-extraction operation over intuitionistic
fuzzy sets were proposed by B. Riecan and K. Atanassov[9]. In 2010, Operation division by n
over intuitionistic fuzzy sets were proposed by B. Riecan and K. Atanassov [10]. In 2010,
Remarks on equalities between intuitionistic fuzzy sets was K. Atanassov[4]. In 2008, properties
of some IFS operators and operations were proposed by Liu Q, Ma C and Zhou X [7]. In 2008,
Four equalities connected with intuitionistic fuzzy sets was proposed by T. Vasilev [14]. In 2011,
Intuitionistic fuzzy sets: Some new results were proposed by R. K. Verma and B. D. Sharma[15].
In 1989, the notion of Interval-Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets which is a generalization of both
DOI : 10.5121/ijfls.2014.4401

International Journal of Fuzzy Logic Systems (IJFLS) Vol.4, No.4, October 2014

Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets and Interval-Valued Fuzzy Sets were proposed by K. Atanassov and G.
Gargov [5]. After the introduction of IVIFS, many researchers have shown interest in the IVIFS
theory and applied it to the various field. In 1994, Operators over interval-valued intuitionistic
fuzzy sets was proposed by K. Atanassov[6]. In 2007, methods for aggregating interval-valued
intuitionistic fuzzy information and their application to decision making was proposed by Z.S. Xu
[17]. In 2007, Some geometric aggregation operators based on interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy
sets and their application to group decision making were proposed by G.W .Wei and X.R.Wang
[16]. In 2012, Some Results on Generalized Interval-Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets were
proposed by Monoranjan Bhowmik and Madhumangal Pal[8]. In 2013, Interval-Valued
Intuitionistic Hesitant Fuzzy Aggregation Operators and Their Application in Group DecisionMaking were proposed by Zhiming Zhang [19]. In 2014, new Operations over Interval Valued
Intuitionistic Hesitant Fuzzy Set were proposed by Broumi and Florentin Smarandache [11]. This
paper proceeds as follows: In section 2 some basic definitions related to intuitionistic fuzzy sets,
interval valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets and set operations are introduced over the IVIFSs are
presented. In section 3 two new operators 
 and 
 defined over IVIFSs are introduced and
proved. In section 4 and 5, Conclusion and Acknowledgments are given.


2. PRELIMINARIES
Definition 2.1:
Intuitionistic Fuzzy Set [1,2]: An intuitionistic fuzzy set A in the finite universe X is defined as

 ,  ,   |   , where  :  0,1 and  :  0,1
with the
condition 0  sup! " # sup! "  1, for any  . The intervals   and  
denote the degree of membership function and the degree of non-membership of the element x to
the set A.
Definition 2.2:

Interval valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy Set [5]: An Interval valued intuitionistic fuzzy set A in the
finite universe X is defined as A ,  ,  , |   . The intervals   and  
denote the degree of membership function and the degree of non-membership of the element x to
the set A. For every  ,  and   are closed intervals and their Left and Right end
points
are
denoted
by% , & ,
% ,and& .Let
us
denote
% , & )
% , & )
& 
& 
% 

 ', (

, (

|  *Where 0  
# 
 1 , 
+
% 
%
&
%
&
0, 
+ 0. Especially if         and         then the
given IVIFS A is reduced to an ordinary IFS.
Let us define the empty IVIFS, the totally uncertain IVIFS and the unit IVIFS by:
,  , 0,0, 1,1 |  , .  , 0,0, 1,1 |  /0 1 
, 1,1, 0,0 |  .

Definition 2.2. Set operations on IVIFSs [5]: Let A and B be two IVIFSs on the universe X,
where

International Journal of Fuzzy Logic Systems (IJFLS) Vol.4, No.4, October 2014

 '2 , (% , & ) , (% , & )3 |  * 4

 ' 2, (5% , 5& ) , (5% , 5& )3 |  *

Here, we define some set operations for IVIFSs:

4  7 8

4  78

, (9/!% , 5% " , 9/!& , 5& ") ,

!9:!% , 5% " , 9:!& , 5& " "

, (9:!% , 5% " , 9:!& , 5& ") ,

; |   <

; |   <
!9/!% , 5% " , 9/!& , 5& " "
, !%  # 5%  @ % 5% , & 5&  @ & 5& ",
A |   B

# 4  > ?
% , 5%  , & 5&  
, !% 5%  , & , 5& ",

4  > ? %
A |   B
  # 5%  @ % 5% , &  # 5&  @ & 5&  

D  E F, !% , & ", !% , & "G |  H
I
 EF, !% , & ", !1 @ % , 1 @ & "G|  H

 EF, !1 @ % , 1 @ & " , !% , & "G|  H





 EF, !1 @ !1 @ % " , 1 @ !1 @ & " ", !!% " , !& " "G|  H





  EF, !!% " , !& " ", !1 @ !1 @ % " , 1 @ !1 @ & " "G|  H

 >? , L M!% ", M!& "N , L1 @ M!1 @ % ", 1 @ M!1 @ & "NA |  B






 >?, L1 @ M!1 @ % ", 1 @ M!1 @ & "N , L M!% ", M!& "NA |  B,


Where  + 1 is natural number.

3. TWO NEW OPERATOR OPO AND PO DEFINED OVER IVIFS ARE

O
INTRODUCED AND PROVED
Q

Operations extraction as well as of operation Multiplication of an IVIFS
 with  and

Multiplication of an IVIFS
 with . It has the form for every IVIFS and for every natural
number  + 1


Two new Operators, defined over IVIFS are introduced, which will be an analogous as of



^
UX
a


 , Y1 @ Z1 @ M!% ", 1 @ Z1 @ M!& "[ ,]
W
S
S
S
S
1 
W
]

  W
| 


]

T
`



W Z
]
%
&
Y 1 @ M!1 @  " , Z1 @ M!1 @  " [
S
S
SW
S
]
RV
\
_



% "
& "
, (1 @ !1 @ !
" , 1 @ !1 @ !
" ),

  bc
d |  e


 
(!1 @ !1 @ % " " , !1 @ !1 @ & " " )

International Journal of Fuzzy Logic Systems (IJFLS) Vol.4, No.4, October 2014

Theorem 3.1. For any two IVIFSs A and B and for every natural number  + 1:
/. 
 4   
 4 , f. 
 4   
 4


1 
1 
1 
1 
1  1 
g. h
 4  i 
 4  , 0 . h
 4  i 
 4  .






Proof: /.

 4 




EF, ! !% " , !& " ", !1 @ !1 @ % " , 1 @ !1 @ & " "G|   H

[
  Y
% "
& "
% "
& "
EF, ! !5
, !5
", !1 @ !1 @ 5
, 1 @ !1 @ 5
"G|  H
%
%
&
&
UX, (9:!! " , !5 " ", 9:!! " , !5 " ") ,^
a
l
q


W
]
%
%
 k
|   p
9/!1 @ !1 @  " , 1 @ !1 @ 5 " ",
TW
`
]
m

 n
9/!1 @ !1 @ & " , 1 @ !1 @ 5& " "
RV
\
_
j
o

% "
% "
,
!
")
,
1
@
(1
@
9: !!
^
UX
a

5
, Y
[,
W
]
S
S


S
S
1 @ (1 @ 9: !!& " , !5& " ")
W
]
| 


 W

]
T (9/ !1 @ !1 @ % " , 1 @ !1 @ 5% " ") ,
`
W
]
S
S
Y
[
 ]
SW
S
& "
& "
(9/ !1
@
!1
@

,
1
@
!1
@

")
5
5
RV
\
_


1 @ (9/ !1 @ !% " , 1 @ !5% " ") ,

^
UX
a
,
Y
[, ]
W
S
S


S
S
1 @ (9/ !1 @ !& " , 1 @ !5& " ")
W
]
 W
| 




]
TW 9/ (!1 @ !1 @ % " " , !1 @ !1 @ 5% " " ) , ]
`
S
S
SW Y

 []
S
& "
& "
"
,
!1
@
!1
@

"
)
9/
(!1
@
!1
@


5
RV
\
_


% "
% "
1 @ 9/ (!1 @ !
" , !1 @ !5
" ), ^
UX
a
, Y

 [,]
W


S
S
S
S
1 @ 9/ (!1 @ !& " " , !1 @ !5& " " ) ]
W
 W
| 




]
T W 9/ (!1 @ !1 @ % " " , !1 @ !1 @ 5% " " ) , ]
`
S
S
Y
[


SW
S
]
& "
& "
9/
(!1
@
!1
@

"
,
!1
@
!1
@

"
)

5
\
RV
_


% "
% "
9: (1 @ !1 @ !
" , 1 @ !1 @ !5
" ), ^
UX
a
, Y

 [ ,]
W


S
S
S
S
9: (1 @ !1 @ !& " " , 1 @ !1 @ !5& " " ) ]
W
| 


 W


]
TW 9/ (!1 @ !1 @ % " " , !1 @ !1 @ 5% " " ) , ]
`
S
S
Y
[
SW
S
]
 
 
9/ (!1 @ !1 @ & " " , !1 @ !1 @ 5& " " ) \
RV
_


% "
& "
, (1 @ !1 @ !
" , 1 @ !1 @ !
" ),
bc
d | eq


 
l
(!1 @ !1 @ % " " , !1 @ !1 @ & " " )
k
p
p
k



k
p
% "
& "
,
(1
@
!1
@
!
"
,
1
@
!1
@
!
"
)
,
k
p
5
5
bc
d | e




(!1 @ !1 @ 5% " " , !1 @ !1 @ 5& " " )
j
o


 
 4
Hence / is proved and similarly (b) is proved by analogy.
Proof:g.

International Journal of Fuzzy Logic Systems (IJFLS) Vol.4, No.4, October 2014


1 
h
 4  i


%
&
%
&
78, m L M N , L M Nn , L1 @ M!1 @  ", 1 @ M!1 @  "N; |   <
l
q
1k

p
 k

p
k
p




%
&
%
&
78, m L M5 N , L M5 Nn , L1 @ M!1 @ 5 ", 1 @ M!1 @ 5 "N; |  <
j
o


UX, m 9: L M % , M % N , 9: L M & , M & Nn ,^

a

5

5
lSW
]
Sq
SW
Sp
]
k
1


] |   p
 k W
9/ L1 @ M!1 @ % ", 1 @ M!1 @ 5% "N ,
 kTW
l
q ]
`p
k
p ]
kSW
Sp


9/ L1 @ M!1 @ & ", 1 @ M!1 @ 5& "N
SW
S
]
j
o
\
jRV
_o




^
UX
a
%
%
l1 @ Z m1 @ 9: L M , M5 Nn ,q
]
SW
S
SW , k
S
p, ]
SW
S
]
k
p



SW
S
]
1 @ Z m1 @ 9: L M& , M5& Nn
SW
S
]
j
o
| 


 W
]
TW 
`


]
%
%
SW l Z9/ L1 @ M!1 @  ", 1 @ M!1 @ 5 "N ,q]
S
SW k
S
p]
S
S
k
p
W
]

S


S
&
&
SW Z9/ L1 @ M!1 @  ", 1 @ M!1 @ 5 "N ]
S
o\
RV j
_




^
UX
a
Z9/ L1 @ M% , 1 @ M5% N ,q
1
@

l
]
SW
S
SW
]
S
p,
, k
SW
S
]
k
p



SW
S
]
1 @ Z9/ L1 @ M& , 1 @ M5& N
SW
S
]
j
o
] |  
 W


]
TW
`


%
%
SWl9/ Y Z1 @ M!1 @  " , Z1 @ M!1 @ 5 "[ ,q ]
S
SW k
S
p]
SW k
S
p ]


p
SW k
]
S


&
&
SW 9/ Y Z1 @ M!1 @  " , Z1 @ M!1 @ 5 "[ ]
S
RV j
_
o\

International Journal of Fuzzy Logic Systems (IJFLS) Vol.4, No.4, October 2014



^
UX
a


% 
Z1 @ M5% [ ,q ]
ZL1
M
1
@
9/
Y
@
N
,

SW l
S
p ]
SW k
S
,
p, ]
SW k
S

SW k 1 @ 9/ Y ZL1 @ M & N , Z1 @ M & [ p ]
S

5
SW
]
S
j
o ]
 W
|  
TW
`
]




SWl9/ Y Z1 @ M!1 @ % " , Z1 @ M!1 @ 5% "[ ,q ]
S
SW k
]
S
p
SW k
S
p ]


SW k
S
p
]


&
&
SW 9/ Y Z1 @ M!1 @  " , Z1 @ M!1 @ 5 "[ ]
S
RV j
o\
_



^
UX
a


%
%
Z
S W l9: Y1 @ ZL1 @ M N , 1 @ 1 @ M5 [ ,q ]
S
p]
SW k
S
,
p ,]
SW k
S

S W k 9: Y1 @ ZL1 @ M & N , 1 @ Z1 @ M & [ p ]
S

5
SW
]
S
j
o]
 W
|  
TW
`
]




S W l9/ Y Z1 @ M!1 @ % " , Z1 @ M!1 @ 5% "[ ,q ]
S
SW k
]
S
p
SW k
S
p ]


SW k
S
p
]


&
&
S W 9/ Y Z1 @ M!1 @  " , Z1 @ M!1 @ 5 "[ ]
S
RV j
o \
_

UX, L1 @ M(1 @ r% ) , 1 @ M(1 @ r& )N ,^

a
Sq
]
l SW
] |  p
k W 

`p
kTW Y Z1 @ M!1 @  % " , Z1 @ M!1 @  & " [ ]


W
]
S
Sp
k
R
V
\
_p
k
k

p




k UX
% 
& 
ap
, L1 @ M(1 @ r5 ) , 1 @ M(1 @ r5 )N ,^
k SW
Sp
]
k W
] |  p

k TW 


]
`p
%
&
SW Y Z1 @ M!1 @ 5 " , Z1 @ M!1 @ 5 " [ ]
S
j RV
\
_o
1 
1 

 4 




Hence g is proved and similarly (d) is proved by analogy.

International Journal of Fuzzy Logic Systems (IJFLS) Vol.4, No.4, October 2014

Theorem 3.2. For every IVIFS A and for every natural number  + 1:

/. I
  I
 ; f .
 
 ; g. I
  I
 ; 0. 
  
 .



1 
I


1




 I 78, m L M% N , L M& Nn , L1 @ M!1 @ % ", 1 @ M!1 @ & "N ; | <


Proof: (a).

I

U
T
R

c, Y1 @ ZL1 @ M% N , 1 @ ZL1 @ M& N[ , Y Z1 @ M!1 @ % " , Z1 @ M!1 @ & " [d


| 



^
UX
a
, L1 @ M(1 @ r% ) , 1 @ M(1 @ r& )N ,
SW
S
]
|


 W
]


TW
`


%
&
S m1 @ L1 @ M(1 @ r )N , 1 @ L1 @ M(1 @ r )Nn]
S
RV
\
_


a
`
_

 >?, L1 @ M(1 @ r% ) , 1 @ M(1 @ r& )N , L M(1 @ r% ) , M(1 @ r& )NA | B


(3.1)

1
I







1
%
&
%
&
I bc8, m L M N , L M Nn , L1 @ M!1 @  ", 1 @ M!1 @  "N;d | e


1




%
&
%
 >?, L M , M N , L 1 @ M , 1 @ M& NA | B


%
&
%
&
 >?, L1 @ M(1 @ r ) , 1 @ M(1 @ r )N , L M(1 @ r ) , M(1 @ r )NA | B



(3.2)

From (3.1) and (3.2), we get


1  1
I
  I




Hence (a) is proved and similarly (b) is proved by analogy.

I





 I EF, !!% " , !& " ",!1 @ !1 @ % " , 1 @ !1 @ & " "G| H

Proof: g.

 

 

 

 

%
&
%
&
 I tu, (1 @ !1 @ ! " " , 1 @ !1 @ ! " " ) , (!1 @ !1 @  " " , !1 @ !1 @  " " )v | w

International Journal of Fuzzy Logic Systems (IJFLS) Vol.4, No.4, October 2014

 bc

 

 

, (1 @ !1 @ !% " " , 1 @ !1 @ !& " " ) ,

 

 

h1 @ (1 @ !1 @ !% " " ) , 1 @ (1 @ !1 @ !& " " )i

 

 

d | e
 

 

 '2, (1 @ !1 @ !% " " , 1 @ !1 @ !& " " ) , (!1 @ !% " " , !1 @ !& " " )3 | *
(3.3)
I





 IEF, !!% " , !& " ", !1 @ !1 @ % " , 1 @ !1 @ & " " G| H




 EF , !!% " , !& " " , !1 @ !% " , 1 @ !& " " G| H
 

 

 

 

  '2, (1 @ !1 @ !% " " , 1 @ !1 @ !& " " ) , (!1 @ !% " " , !1 @ !& " " ) 3 | *
(3.4)

From (3.3) and (3.4), we get

I
  I

Hence g is proved and similarly (d) is proved by analogy.

Theorem 3.3. For any two IVIFSs A and B and for every natural number  + 1:



1 
1 
1 
1 
1  1 
/. h
 # 4  i 
 # 4  , f. h
 4 i 
 4  ,






g. 
 # 4   
 # 4 , 0. 
 4   
 4 .

Proof:/


1 
h
 # 4 i

1




 L>?, r , 1 @ M!1 @  " A| B # >?, r5 , 1 @ M!1 @ 5 "A | BN




1




 >?, ( r  # r5  @ r  r5  ) , L1 @ M!1 @  "N L1 @ M!1 @ 5 "N A | B



^
UX
a
1 @ M(1 @ r ) #
q
]
SW l
S

SW k

]
S
p
M(1 @ r5 )
SW k 1@
p 
S
]



p , ZL1 @ M!1 @  "N ZL1 @ M!1 @  "N] | 
 W, k
5
]
T W k@ L1 @ M(1 @ r )Np
`

p
]
SW k
S
p
]
SW k
S


SW
S
]
L1 @ M(1 @ r5 )N
o
\
RV j
_



 bc , 1 @ M(1 @ r  ) , ZL1 @ M!1 @  "N d| e



International Journal of Fuzzy Logic Systems (IJFLS) Vol.4, No.4, October 2014
# bc , 1 @ M(1 @ r5 ) , ZL1 @ M!1 @ 5 "Nd| e


1
1




 >?, r , 1 @ M!1 @  "A |  B # >?, r5 , 1 @ M!1 @ 5 "A |  B



1
1

 # 4



Hence (a) is proved and similarly (b) is proved by analogy.

Proof:g


 # 4 




 !EF, ! " , 1 @ !1 @  " G| H # EF, !5 " , 1 @ !1 @ 5 " G| H"

 EF, ! " # !5 " @ ! " !5 " , !1 @ !1 @  " "!1 @ !1 @ 5 " "G| H


 

1 @ !1 @ ! " "

^
UX
a
]
S W l #1 @ !1 @ ! " " q
S
5
 
 
p
]
"
"
 W, k
,
!1
@
!1
@

"
!1
@
!1
@

"
|





5
k
p
T W k@ (1 @ !1 @ ! " " )p
`
]
SW
S

]

R V j (1 @ !1 @ !5 " " ) o
\
_

F
" " , !1 @ !1 @  " " G
 >  , 1 @ !1 @ !
B
| 
 
 
F
" " , !1 @ !1 @ 5 " " G
# >  , 1 @ !1 @ !5
B
| 





 EF, ! " , 1 @ !1 @  " G|  H # EF, !5 " , 1 @ !1 @ 5 " G|  H

 
 # 4
 

 

Hence (c) is proved and similarly (d) is proved by analogy.

Theorem 3.4. For every IVIFS A and for every natural number  + 1:

1 
1
/.  h
 i 
 f. 
  




Proof./.
1 
 h
 i


1




  L >?, L M% , M& N , L1 @ M!1 @ % ", 1 @ M!1 @ & "NA |  BN


International Journal of Fuzzy Logic Systems (IJFLS) Vol.4, No.4, October 2014


^
UX
a


% 
Z
Z1 @ M& [ , ]
M
 ,
Y 1
@
1
@
,
1
@

W
S
S
S
S
W
]
 W
] |  
TW 
`

]


SWY Z1 @ M!1 @ % " , Z1 @ M!1 @ & " []
S
S
S
\
RV
_


^
UX
a



SW l x1 @ x1 @ Y1 @ Z1 @ M%  [y y ,q Y Z1 @ M!1 @  % " [ , ]
S
l
q

SW k
S
]
p
k
p]
p
 W, k
,
| 



p
k
p k 
TW k
`
p]


SW k x1 @ x1 @ Y1 @ Z1 @ M &  [y y p Y Z1 @ M!1 @ & " [ ]
S

SW
S
]
j
o
\
RV j
o
_


U
a


Sz, lY1 @ Y Z1 @ M %  [ [ , Y1 @ Y Z1 @ M &  [ [q , L1 @ M!1 @  % " , 1 @ M!1 @  & "N{S





T j
`
o
S
S
R
_
|  
 78, m1 @ L1 @ M% N , 1 @ L1 @ M& Nn , L1 @ M!1 @ % ", 1 @ M!1 @ & "N; |  <


 >?, L M% , M& N , L1 @ M!1 @ % ", 1 @ M!1 @ & "N A |  B






Hence (a) is proved.

Proof.f.
1

 



1




! EF, !!% " , !& " ", !1 @ !1 @ % " , 1 @ !1 @ & " " G|  H"

 

 

%
&
1  , ( 1 @ !1 @ ! " " , 1 @ !1 @ ! " " )
d |  e
 bc
 
 

, (!1 @ !1 @  % " " , !1 @ !1 @  & " " )


10

International Journal of Fuzzy Logic Systems (IJFLS) Vol.4, No.4, October 2014


^
UX
a
L1 @ Mh1 @ (1 @ !1 @ !% " " )iN ,
l
q
]
SW
S
, k
SW
S
p,
]



SW
S
]
L1 @ Mh1 @ (1 @ !1 @ !& " " )iN
 W
]|  
j
o
TW
`
]


]
 
S W M
S
% "
&
" N , L M!1 @ !1 @  " " N[]
S WYL !1 @ !1 @ 
S
SV
S
\

R
_


% "
UX
^
a
M
" N ,
SW l1 @ L !1 @ !
S
q
% "
& " ]
 W, k
, ! 1 @ !1 @ 
, 1 @ !1 @ 
"] |  
p

TW
`
 
]
1 @ L M!1 @ !& " " N
S
S
\
RV j
_
o


%
&
%
&
 tu, (1 @ !1 @ ! " ", 1 @ !1 @ ! " ") , !1 @ !1 @  " , 1 @ !1 @  " "v |  w



 EF, ! !% " , !& " ", !1 @ !1 @ % " , 1 @ !1 @ & " "G|  H





Hence (b) is proved.

Theorem 3.5: For every IVIFS A and for every natural number n +1:



(a). | h |
i 
 , (b). |!|
"  




Proof. (a).


1
| L |
N



1
 | h EF, !% , & ", !% , & "G |  } Hi


%
&
%
&
 | L> ?, L1 @ M1 @ ! ", 1 @ M1 @ ! "N , L M! ", M! "N A| BN








^
UX
a


% " Z
Z
M1
,
Y
1
@
@
!
,
1 @ M1 @ !& "[ , ]

lS
SW
Sq
S
]
k W
p
 | k W
] |  p
`p
kT W


]


S WY1 @ ZL1 @ M!% "N , 1 @ ZL1 @ M!& "N[]
S
S
S
jR V
\
_o

11

International Journal of Fuzzy Logic Systems (IJFLS) Vol.4, No.4, October 2014



^
UX
a


, Y1 @ ZL1 @ M!% "N , 1 @ ZL1 @ M!& "N[ ,]
W
S
S
S
S
W
]
 W
|


]
TW
`


]


%
&
Z
Z
S
S
"
"
M1
M1
Y
1
@
@
!
,
1
@
@
!
[
SW


S
]
RV
\
_

1 




Hence (a) is proved.

|!|
"


Proof. (b).

 |!EF, !% , & ", !% , & "G |  } H"

 |!E F, !1 @ !1 @ % " , 1 @ !1 @ & " ", !!% " , !& " "G| H"


 

 

 

 

%
&
%
&
 | t2 , (!1 @ !1 @  " " , !1 @ !1 @  " " ) , (1 @ !1 @ ! " " , 1 @ !1 @ ! " " )3 |  w

 

 

 

 

 ' 2, (1 @ !1 @ !% " " , 1 @ !1 @ !& " " ) , (!1 @ !1 @ % " " , !1 @ !1 @ & " " )3 |  *
 


Hence (b) is proved.

4. CONCLUSION
In this paper, two new operators based IVIFS were introduced and few theorems were proved. In
future, the application of this operator will be proposed and another two operators based on IVIFS
are to be introduced.

5. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The authors are highly grateful to the Editor-in-Chief and Reviewer Professor Ayad Ghany
Ismaeel and the referees for their valuable comments and suggestions.

REFERENCES
[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]

K. Atanassov, (1986) Intuitionistic fuzzy sets, Fuzzy Sets & Systems., vol. 20, pp. 87-96.
K. Atanassov, (1999) Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets, Springer Physica-Verlag, Berlin.
K. Atanassov, (1994) New operations defined over the intuitionistic fuzzy sets, Fuzzy Sets
&Systems, vol.61, pp, 37-42.
K. Atanassov, (2010) Remarks on equalities between intuitionistic fuzzy sets, Notes on
Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets, vol.16, no.3, pp. 40-41.
12

International Journal of Fuzzy Logic Systems (IJFLS) Vol.4, No.4, October 2014
[5]
[6]
[7]
[8]
[9]
[10]
[11]
[12]
[13]
[14]
[15]
[16]

[17]
[18]
[19]

K. Atanassov and G. Gargov,(1989) Interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets, Fuzzy Sets and
Systems, vol. 31, pp. 343-349.
K. Atanassov, (1994) Operators over interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets, Fuzzy Sets and
Systems. vol. 64, no.2, pp. 159-174.
Q.Liu, C. Ma and X. Zhou, (2008) On properties of some IFS operators and operations, Notes on
Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets, Vol. 14, no.3, pp. 17-24.
Monoranjan Bhowmik and Madhumangal Pal,(2012) Some Results on Generalized Interval-Valued
Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets, International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, vol. 14, no.2.
B. Riecan and K. Atanassov,(2006) n-extraction operation over intuitionistic fuzzy sets, Notes in
Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets, vol 12, no.4, pp. 911.
B. Riecan and K. Atanassov,(2010) Operation division by n over intuitionistic fuzzy sets, Notes in
Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets, vol. 16, no.4, pp. 14.
Said Broumi and Florentin Smarandache,(2014) New Operations over Interval Valued Intuitionistic
Hesitant Fuzzy Set, Mathematics and Statistics, vol. 2 no. 2, pp. 62-71.
Supriya Kumar De, Ranjit Biswas and Akhil Ranjan Roy, (2000) Some operations on intuitionistic
fuzzy sets, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 114, no. 4, pp. 477484.
Supriya Kumar De, Ranjit Biswas and Akhil Ranjan Roy, (2001) An application of intuitionistic
fuzzy sets in medical diagnosis, Fuzzy Sets & System, vol. 117 no. 2, pp. 209-213.
T. Vasilev, (2008) Four equalities connected with intuitionistic fuzzy sets, Notes on Intuitionistic
Fuzzy Sets, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 1-4.
R. K. Verma and B. D. Sharma, (2011) Intuitionistic fuzzy sets: Some new results, Notes on
Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets, vol. 17, no. 3, pp.1-10.
G. W. Wei, and X. R. Wang, (2007) Some geometric aggregation operators based on interval-valued
intuitionistic fuzzy sets and their application to group decision making, In Proceedings of the
international conference on computational intelligence and security, pp. 495-499.
Z. S. Xu, (2007) Methods for aggregating interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy information and their
application to decision making, Control Decis. vol. 22, no.2, pp. 215-219.
L. A. Zadeh, (1965) Fuzzy Sets, Information & Control, Vol.8, pp. 338-353.
Zhiming Zhang, (2013) Interval-Valued Intuitionistic Hesitant Fuzzy Aggregation Operators and
their application in Group Decision Making, Journal of Applied Mathematics.

13