Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Outline
Future Innovations
Super Girder
Up to 70 strands
WWR
Long span capability
Can be P/T
CA Wide Flange
Pretensioned
Post Tensioned
WF Bottom
Flange
#5 Stirrup
WWR
3 5/8 diameter
ducts
54 Straight strand
14 Harped strand
5
r
=
yt yb
r=
I
A
6
Non-Composite Section
Composite Section
Girder Spacing = 10 ft
D
= 0.045
S
Simple Span
Girder Spacing = 10 ft
10
WF Capabilities Summary
D/S = 0.04 (Continuous)
D/S = 0.045 (Simple)
Spacing 10 12 ft
Span 200 ft
19 0.6 in. Strand
Tendons
11
Innovations
Welded Wire
Reinforcement
Self Consolidating
Concrete
Threaded Rod Continuity
No End Blocks
Pre-bent Stirrups
12
Design Examples
13
WF Girder Alternatives
Threaded Rod Alternative:
Pretensioned Girders
Continuous for deck weight
14
15
16
17
5000
Moment resistance
fs = 54 ksi
ld = 5 ft
4000
3000
Moment (k-ft)
2000
1000
0
0
20
40
60
80
120
-1000
-2000
Deck weight moment demand
-3000
18
-4000
100
140
160
180
Post-tensioned Alternative
19
Analysis Considerations
Elastic behavior no redistribution
Lump-sum losses
Deflections superimposed from each stage
Sag soffit profile not allowed
CT Bridge used for live load and P/T
20
21
22
Girder Post-tensioning
23
Girder + pretension
Stage 1 P/T
Deck weight
Stage 2 P/T
SDL
0.4 in.
2.5 in.
-2.6 in.
0.5 in.
-0.5 in.
Total
0.5 in.
Girder Shear
25
Vn = Vc + Vs + V p 0.25 f cbv d v
26
27
Abutments
Post-tensioned Alternative
28
Bent Cap
29
30
UCSD
31
Cost Analysis
Item
Superstructure
Threaded
Rod
Posttensioned
CIP Box
$2,034,000
$2,130,000
$2,515,000
Substructure
$770,000
$1,140,000
$1,055,000
Other*
$398,000
$330,000
$304,000
$3,202,000
$3,600,000
$3,874,000
Total
32
33
Future Innovations
0.7 in. Strand
Full-depth precast deck
panels
Railroad applications
Prefabricated substructure
connections
34
WF Capabilities
Simple Span
Girder Spacing = 10 ft
35
36
37
38
Acknowledgements
39