Você está na página 1de 46

EX PARTE

OAO 240 (Rev. 10/03)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


UNITED STATES
District of COLUMBIA
VICTOR DEL RIO
2427 PINPOINT DR
SPRING, TX 77373
PH 281-216-5624 APPLICATION TO PROCEED
EMAIL delrvich@gmail.com
Plaintiff PLAINTIFF WITHOUT PREPAYMENT OF
V. FEES AND AFFIDAVIT
US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
V.
US ATTORNEY GENERAL ERIC HOLDER
950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,
Washington DC 20530-0001
PH 202-514-2000 CASE NUMBER:
EMAIL askdoj@usdoj.gov DEFENDANT
Defendant

I, VICTOR DEL RIO declare that I am the (check appropriate box)


G petitioner/plaintiff/movant G other
in the above-entitled proceeding; that in support of my request to proceed without prepayment of fees or costs
under 28 USC §1915 I declare that I am unable to pay the costs of these proceedings and that I am entitled to the
relief sought in the complaint/petition/motion.
In support of this application, I answer the following questions under penalty of perjury:
1. Are you currently incarcerated? G Yes G No (If “No,” go to Part 2)
If “Yes,” state the place of your incarceration
Are you employed at the institution? Do you receive any payment from the institution?
Attach a ledger sheet from the institution(s) of your incarceration showing at least the past six months’
transactions.
2. Are you currently employed? G Yes G No
a. If the answer is “Yes,” state the amount of your take-home salary or wages and pay period and give the
name and address of your employer. (List both gross and net salary.)
WAL-MART, 155 Louetta Crossing, Spring, TX 77373; $7.50 PER HOUR - variable

b. If the answer is “No,” state the date of your last employment, the amount of your take-home salary or wages
and pay period and the name and address of your last employer.

3. In the past 12 twelve months have you received any money from any of the following sources?
a. Business, profession or other self-employment G Yes G No
b. Rent payments, interest or dividends G Yes G No
c. Pensions, annuities or life insurance payments G Yes G No
d. Disability or workers compensation payments G Yes G No
e. Gifts or inheritances G Yes G No
f. Any other sources G Yes G No

If the answer to any of the above is “Yes,” describe, on the following page, each source of money and state the
amount received and what you expect you will continue to receive.

USDCDC 1 OF 46
AO 240 Reverse (Rev. 10/03)

4. Do you have any cash or checking or savings accounts? G Yes G No

If “Yes,” state the total amount.

5. Do you own any real estate, stocks, bonds, securities, other financial instruments, automobiles or any other
thing of value? G Yes G No

If “Yes,” describe the property and state its value.


1996 FORD RANGER P/U, 146K MILES, $700 APPROX

6. List the persons who are dependent on you for support, state your relationship to each person and indicate
how much you contribute to their support. (If children are dependents, please refer to them by their initials)
NICHOLAS DEL RIO, SON, 710.00 PER MONTH, PER UNFINALIZED VOID ORDERS NO. 2000-27121

IFP permission granted in 98% of cases: (most recent) US Supreme Court Case No. 09-6398,
Tx Supreme Court Case No.s 08-0896 & 09-0702, US Federal Claims Case No. 09-130C

I declare under penalty of perjury that the above information is true and correct.

DEC 21, 2009

Date Signature of Applicant

NOTICE TO PRISONER: A Prisoner seeking to proceed without prepayment of fees shall submit an affidavit
stating all assets. In addition, a prisoner must attach a statement certified by the appropriate institutional officer
showing all receipts, expenditures, and balances during the last six months in your institutional accounts. If you have
multiple accounts, perhaps because you have been in multiple institutions, attach one certified statement of each
account.

USDCDC 2 OF 46
EX PARTE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

DO NOT WRITE ON SAMPLE FORM

VICTOR DEL RIO


YOURPINPOINT
2427 NAME DR
YOUR ADDRESS
SPRING, TX 77373
PH 281-216-5624
CITY, STATE & ZIP CODE
EMAIL delrvich@gmail.com
YOUR TELEPHONE NO.
PLAINTIFF

VS. CIVIL ACTION NO. (To be filled in by Clerk)

US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
DEFENDANT(S)
US ATTORNEY GENERAL NAME(S)
ERIC HOLDER
THEIR ADDRESS
950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,
Washington DC 20530-0001
CITY, STATE & ZIP CODE
PH 202-514-2000
EMAIL askdoj@usdoj.gov

COMPLAINT
DEFENDANT
DO NOT WRITE ON SAMPLE FORM

SET FORTH
THIRD PARTY THE FACTS OF YOUR CASE.
DEFENDANTS: 42 USC § 2000d-7; 28 USC § 2403;
Tracey Del Rio, Lois Hill, 42 USC § 1983; 42 USC § 421;
Spring ISD Special Services, 28 USC § 2254; 18 USC § 241 & 242;
ON THE
Denise LAST PAGE
Drexler, OF YOUR COMPLAINT, SPELL
Doug Warne, OUT§ THE
18 USC 1512 RELIEF
& 1513; YOU ARE
REQUESTING
Baylor CollegeFROM THIS COURT.
of Medicine, Bivens 403 U.S. 388;
Texas Children's Hospital, Ex Parte Young, 209 U.S. 123 (1908),
Cole Speech & Language Center, Monell, 436 U.S. 658 (1978);
IF YOU
City ARE ASKING
of Houston, Juana FOR
Del A TRIAL BY JURY, YOU
Rio, MUST
Civil STATE
Rights Act THIS IN YOUR
of 1871 & 1964;
COMPLAINT.
Maggie Del Rio, Josefina Del Rio, FALSE CLAIMS, & 4th & 9th Amendments
2431 Pinpoint Drive Spring TX 77373,
Depelchin Family Center,
IF YOU
David ARE REQUESTING
Khaleq, Dollar GeneralA SPECIFIC
on AMOUNT OF MONEY, STATE THIS IN YOUR
COMPLAINT. Rd,
Rayford-Sawdust
Baker Hughes Oilfield Operations,
Ray & Myrna Gregory, Elizabeth Pagel,
(more to be added soon)
_______________________________
ORIGINAL SIGNATURE (IN PEN)
_
VICTOR DEL RIO
YOURPINPOINT
2427 NAME DRIVE
YOUR ADDRESS
SPRING, TX 77373
CITY, STATE & ZIP CODE

Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 520 (1971) Supreme Court found that pro se pleadings
should be held to "less stringent standards" than those drafted by attorneys.

USDCDC 3 OF 46
JURISDICTION AND VENUE

JURISDICTION and VENUE are proper pursuant to:

01. Public Law 96-170 Dec 29 1979.

02. Article I, II, & III of the D.C. Constitution and under the 14th Amendment Section 3.

03. 31 USC § 3732 (False claims jurisdiction)

04. 42 USC § 2000c–8 (Personal suits for relief against discrim ination in public education)

05. 42 USC § 2000a–6 (Jurisdiction; exhaustion of other rem edies; exclusiveness of remedies; assertion of

rights based on other Federal or State laws and pursuit of remedies for enforcement of such rights)

06. 28 USC § 1367 (Supplemental jurisdict ion)

07. 28 USC § 1631(Transfer to cure want of jurisdiction)

08. 28 USC § 1402 (United States as defendant)

09. 28 USC § 2679 (Exclusiveness of remed y)

10. D.C. CODE § 16-1901(b) Petition; issuance of writ.

11. D.C. CODE § 11-501. Civil jurisdiction. In addition to its jurisdict ion as a United States district court

and any other jurisdiction conferred on it by law, the United States District Court for the District of

Columbia has jurisdiction of the following:

(1) Any civil action or other matter begun in the court before the effect ive date of the District of

Columbia Court Reorganization Act of 1970 other than any matter over which the Superior Court of

the District of Columbia takes jurisdiction under section 11-921(a)(4)(G) or 11-921(a)(5)(B).

(4) Any civil action (other than a matter over which the Superior Court of the District of Columbia

has jurisdict ion under paragraph (3) or (4) of section 11-921(a)) begun in the court during the thirty-

month period beginning on such effective date wherein the amount in cont roversy exceeds $50,000.

12. 5th Amendment of US Constitution: No person … be deprived of life, liberty, or p roperty, without due

process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

13. 9th Amendment of US Constitution: The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be

construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people. Ref Quo Warranto

14.Article IV, Section IV: The Guarantee Clause

15. Civil Rights Act of 1871 (42 USC Sec 1983)

USDCDC 4 OF 46
16. Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction And Enforcement Act ("UCCJEA") Section 204

All of which gives the HONORABLE DISTRICT COURT OF THE DISTRIC T OF COLUMBIA

JURISDICTION over SUBJECT MATTER JURIS DICTION and PERSONAL JURISDICTION to

hear PETITIONER'S CLAIMS.

COMPLAINT

17.

Now Comes PETITIONER, VICTOR DEL RIO, on behalf of SON and himself, both long term victims of

State and Federal Crimes (s ince 1996), suffering irreparable damages, retaliation (Title II and ADA 504

discrimination), denials and deprivations of their Civil Rights, and loss of life-libert y-propert y, as

Naturalist Citizens of the United States of America, who have not rescinded their Cit izenship to their

Country. Their Urgent Pleading for Redress for Grievances comes in the form of this COMPLAINT for

damages and violations started in 1996 by TRACEY DEL RIO:

01) In 1996, SO N unknowingly inflict ed with brain dama ges,

02) In March 1998, SON suspected to be Autistic,

03) In July 2000, SO N unknowingly intentionally near-drowned to ca use brain seizures,

04) In August 2000, SON now confirmed to be Autistic,

05) Since July 2000

a. resultant brain damages and seizures remain undisclosed or

falsely diagnosed as symptomatic to Aut ism until PETITIONER'S discovery in early 2008

b. Parents divorced, standard custody until January 2006, then every other week custody,

c. School district (Spring Independent School District ) denies IDEA 2004 compliant F.A.P.E.

06) In mid 2007, Due Process against SISD is permitted but completely biased and prejudiced for SISD

07) In July through February 2007, PETITIONER is repeatedly burglarized,

08). In August 2007, PETITIONER is w rongly terminated,

09) From September through December 2007, PETITIONER home schools SON with amazing results and

aptitude NOT attributed to SON by ANYONE before-during-after this time.

10) In December 2007, PETITIONER requests another Due Process and files in local District Court for

Public Funding of Private Education

USDCDC 5 OF 46
11) On December 16th, TRACEY DEL RIO denies SON and PETITIONER almost all conta ct until March

in order to prevent further HEARINGS which SON and PETITIONER had both decided to end to focus

on their new family business (com ic book publishing) combined, home schooling, and pursuing their

mutual dream.

12) Since December 16th to date, PETITIONER and SON have tolerated DISCRIMINATION (retaliation)

from Family Court 311 and every other Court,

13) Since December 16th to date, PETITIONER and SON have tolerated Federal Torts,

14) Since December 16th to date, PETITIONER and SON have tolerated NO LEGAL REMEDY

in almost all Courts inc. Texas Supreme Court, U.S. Supreme Court, local Courts,

etc...

15) Since December 16th to date, PETITIONER and SON et al have learned ongoing DENIAL of IDEA

2004 Compliant F.A.P.E. and how to HANDLE and REMOVE PETITIONER are according to a

classified 'protocol' in the hands of SISD, their legal counsel Bracewell & Giuliani and Thompson &

Hort on, and the Texas Attorney General.

16) PETITIONER and SO N, without any legal counsel, have been and are still facing immense legal

complexities:

a. Family Court issues – custody, child abuse, void orders, denial of Due Process,

b. Federal and State court issues – FALSE CLAIMS, F.T.C.A., Civil rights,

Constitutional dama ges, Torts, State Action Requirement, duo jurisdictions, et c...

EXPEDITED AND MANDATORY RE LIEF REQUESTED

18. Expedited Writ of Habeas Corpus (or Writ of Right) for return of SON suffering brain

damages-brain seizures-history of developmental delays caused by TRACEY DE L RIO, who

accelerated her abuse since December 16th, 2007.

a. DC ST 1981 § 16-1901 (Petition; issuance of writ),

b. Rules Gove rning Domestic Relations Proceedings (SCR-Dom. Rel.) Rule 64,

c. Crime Victims' Rights Act of 2004, 18 U.S.C. § 3771(a)(1) & (d)(3)

d. UCCJEA

19. Permission for PETITIONER to testify via Teleconference, Internet, Video, or locally to

USDCDC 6 OF 46
MAGISTRATE, to arrange # 01

20. Court appointed legal counsel pursuant to:

a. Crime Victims' Rights Act of 2004, 18 U.S.C. § 3771(a)(5)

b. Intervention by United States or a State, 28 USC § 2403

c. Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 24

d. US Constitution 6th Amendment (effective counsel)

21. Emergency local special sessions pursuant to DC ST § 11-911 (Emergency authority to conduct

proceedings outside Dist rict of Columbia) in a local Court since PETITIONER'S are residents of

Texas and bankrupted, denied gainful employment, denied their right ful share to proceedings

against former employer, (Pugh v. Baker Hughes Oilfield Operations, Inc., No. 4:07-CV-2869),

denied approx. 8 months of unemployment insurance by former employer, both forced to reside with

DEFENDANTS (CO-CONSPIRATORS) aggravating their damages by:

a. restricting their access to 'legal remedies' (by phone, internet, mail, etc...),

b. conspiring to interfere with civil rights (42 USC § 1985) by

1. false allegations of PETITIONER being INSANE, BRAIN DAMAGED,UNFIT,

2. involvement in attempts for PETITIONER'S ENTRAPMENT and IMPRISONMENT,

22. Expedited Motion to Vacate & Evidentiary Hearings on Unfinalized,Void Orders, No. 2000-

27121, from 2008 Custody Hearings which disregarded ALL TESTIM ONY and RIGH TS of

PETIONER and SON. Temporary Orders should replace TRACEY DE L RIO with VICTOR DEL

RIO and vice versa;

PETITIONER has not been permitted any conta ct or custody of SON, going on 1.5 years, to:

a. prevent prosecution and legal remedy of DEFENDANTS,

b. help create evidence of 'conduct' to use against PETITIONER,

c. rid themselves of PETITIONER by causing his death, debilitation, imprisonment or

civil commitment without Substantive Due Process, or 'surrender'

23. Proceed over (2) FTCA Forms submitted to US DOJ in mid-May 2009 without reply to date,

total $4 million

24. DEFENDANT's immediate cease and desist of tortious interference by or denials of legal duties owed to

USDCDC 7 OF 46
SON and PETITIONER by:

GREGORY ABBOTT - TEXAS ATTORNEY GENERAL - greg.abbott@oag.state.tx.us

ERIC HOLDER - U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL D.C. - askDOJ@usdoj. gov

as it pertains to F.T.C.A.,

TIM JOHNSON - U.S. ATTORNEY OF HARRIS COUNTY - usatxs.atty@usdoj.gov

THOMAS PEREZ – U.S. ASSIST ATTORNEY GENERAL D.C. - tom.perez @usdoj.gov

as it pertains to Enforcement and Intervention per US AM Chap 8,

RICHARD POWERS – F.B.I. SAIC OF HARRIS COUNTY - richard.powers@ic.fbi.gov

as it pertains to 24x7 illegal surveillance of PETITIONER, Bivens Claims for Constitutional

damages, Investigations per US AM Chap 8,

25. Damages currently total $4 million; however, PETITIONER is very willing to negotiate for the sake of

everyone's best interest – his SON, himself, home state, and country.

26. Return of stolen and forfeited propert y,


and available
27. Any and All Other Relief and Remedy necessary not requested as necessary, such as:

a. Termination of Pa rental Rights for Tracey Del Rio

b. Title II and ADA 504 discrimination for SON & PETITIONER


30. Pursuant to 28 USC § 2254, granting expedited
c. Denial of ID EA 2004 compliant F.A.P.E. Writ of Habeas Corpus for return of SON.

d. Malpractice, etc... 31. Pursuant to 18 USC § 1513, Immediate cessation


of 'protocol' in effect to prevent legal remedy
e. Credit history repair, for PETITIONER and SON through TORTS, FALSE
ALLEGATIONS, FALSE ARREST, etc.. (PROJECT
PAPERCLIP; protocol is conspiracy to disable,
f. Witness protection relocation scapegoat, exhaust & exploit victim
under 'color of law') SEE PGS 14, 31, 34, 39, 41
28. Quo Wa rranto proceedings (if necessary) & CD
29. WRIT OF MANDAMUS directed to FED. JUDGE 32. PETITIONER is forced to reside with
DAVID HITTNER & JUDGE VANESSA GILMORE TO NOTICE DEFENDANTS (JUANA & MAGGIE DEL RIO), longtime
EXPEDITE HEARINGS ON CASE NO. H-09-1651 IN conspirators, helping to falsely portray
LOCAL FEDERAL COURT. 29. PETITIONER as ABUSIVE, VIOLENT, CRAZY, SEX
FIEND, & UNFIT PARENT.
We, the People, reserve the Right to Amend this Petition at any time daring the Process of this action at

bar.

NOTE: PETITIONER REPEATEDLY MADE AWARE OF CONSPIRACY IN 2006 HAS BEEN PLANTING
EVIDENCE TO CONFIRM INVASION OF PRIVACY, CONSPIRACY, ACCUSATIONS OF BEING PARANOID
AND OR CRAZY,

USDCDC 8 OF 46
PRAYER

30.

The District of Columbia not being a State and is not represented in Congress; its officials are not part of

this action as D.C. holds a neutral posit ion. I, VICTOR DEL RIO, respectfully request our case to be heard,

directly or indirect ly through Supervisory Control or Writ of Mandamus, pursuant to Constitutional and

statutory provisions.

SIGNED _____________________________________________________________________
DEC 21, 2009
DATED_______Dec 19, 2009________________________

Respect fully submitted,

VICTOR DEL RIO, 2427 PINPOINT DRIVE, SPRING, TX 77373,

Ph 281-216-5624, Fx 281-617-4218, delrvich@gmail.com

VERIFICATION

I, VICTOR DEL RIO, Sui Juris, hereby verify, under penalty of perjury, under the laws of the United

States of America, without the “United States” (Federal government), that the above statement of facts and

laws is true and correct, according to the best of my current information, knowledge, and belief, and the

attached documents are true and exact copies of the originals with exception to necessary redaction or

notation, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1746(1).

DISTRICT
THIS PETITION is being mailed to the Clerk of the Honorable Court COURT OF
of the Superior THE
Court of the Dist rict

of Columbia and the DEFENDANT'S on this day of _____________ and month of_____________ in the year

2009.

SIGNED _____________________________________________________________________

DEC 19,
DATED_______Dec 21,2009________________________
2009

Respect fully submitted,

VICTOR DEL RIO, 2427 PINPOINT DRIVE, SPRING, TX 77373,

Ph 281-216-5624, Fx 281-617-4218, delrvich@gmail.com

USDCDC 9 OF 46
TABLE OF CONTENTS

I. Application to Proceed IFP...................................................................................................................01

II. CO MPLAINT.........................................................................................................................................03

A. JURISD ICTION AND VENUE.................................................................................................04

B. CO MPLAINT.............................................................................................................................05

C. EXPEDITED AND MANDATORY RELIEF REQUESTED...................................................06

D. NOTICE.....................................................................................................................................08

E. PRAYER....................................................................................................................................09

F. VERIFICATION........................................................................................................................09

III. AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING 01...........................................................................................................11

IV. AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING 02...........................................................................................................12

V. CERTIFICATION OF JUDGEMENT...............................................................................................13

APPENDIX 01–VOID ORDERS NO. 2000-27121..................................................................................14

APPENDIX 02_ PREFERENCE OF CHILD...........................................................................................29

APPENDIX 03_ NOTICE OF DESIGNATION OF RELATED CIVIL CASES.....................................30

APPENDIX 04_ EMERGENCY WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS.............................................................32

APPENDIX 05_ PROOF OF RESTRAINT..............................................................................................34

APPENDIX 06_REASONS FOR GRANTING THE PETITION............................................................35

APPENDIX 07_FTCA FORM 95 #1.........................................................................................................39

APPENDIX 08_FTCA FORM 95 #2.........................................................................................................41

APPENDIX 09_THREATENED IN FEDERAL COURT........................................................................45


US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
US ATTORNEY GENERAL ERIC HOLDER
950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,
Washington DC 20530-0001
PH 202-514-2000
EMAIL askdoj@usdoj.gov

21st

USDCDC 11 OF 46
US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
US ATTORNEY GENERAL ERIC HOLDER
950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,
Washington DC 20530-0001
PH 202-514-2000
EMAIL askdoj@usdoj.gov

21st

USDCDC 12 OF 46
v.
US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
US ATTORNEY GENERAL ERIC HOLDER
950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,
Washington DC 20530-0001
PH 202-514-2000
EMAIL askdoj@usdoj.gov

USDCDC 13 OF 46
U&VFO 1 of 15

U&VFO 1 of 15 USDCDC 14 OF 46
U&VFO 2 of 15

U&VFO 2 of 15 USDCDC 15 OF 46
U&VFO 3 of 15

U&VFO 3 of 15 USDCDC 16 OF 46
U&VFO 4 of 15

U&VFO 4 of 15 USDCDC 17 OF 46
U&VFO 5 of 15

U&VFO 5 of 15 USDCDC 18 OF 46
U&VFO 6 of 15

U&VFO 6 of 15 USDCDC 19 OF 46
U&VFO 7 of 15

U&VFO 7 of 15 USDCDC 20 OF 46
U&VFO 8 of 15

U&VFO 8 of 15 USDCDC 21 OF 46
U&VFO 9 of 15

U&VFO 9 of 15 USDCDC 22 OF 46
U&VFO 10 of 15

U&VFO 10 of 15 USDCDC 23 OF 46
U&VFO 11 of 15

U&VFO 11 of 15 USDCDC 24 OF 46
U&VFO 12 of 15

U&VFO 12 of 15 USDCDC 25 OF 46
U&VFO 13 of 15

U&VFO 13 of 15 USDCDC 26 OF 46
U&VFO 14 of 15

U&VFO 14 of 15 USDCDC 27 OF 46
U&VFO 15 of 15

U&VFO 15 of 15 USDCDC 28 OF 46
USDCDC 29 OF 46
CLERK=S OFFICE CO-932
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Rev. 4/96
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

NOTICE OF DESIGNATION OF RELATED CIVIL CASES PENDING


IN THIS OR ANY OTHER UNITED STATES COURT

Civil Action No. __________


(To be supplied by the Clerk)

NOTICE TO PARTIES:

Pursuant to Rule 40.5(b)(2), you are required to prepare and submit this form at the time of filing any civil action which is
related to any pending cases or which involves the same parties and relates to the same subject matter of any dismissed related cases.
This form must be prepared in sufficient quantity to provide one copy for the Clerk=s records, one copy for the Judge to whom the
cases is assigned and one copy for each defendant, so that you must prepare 3 copies for a one defendant case, 4 copies for a two
defendant case, etc.

NOTICE TO DEFENDANT:

Rule 405(b)(2) of this Court requires that you serve upon the plaintiff and file with your first responsive pleading or motion
any objection you have to the related case designation.

NOTICE TO ALL COUNSEL

Rule 405(b)(3) of this Court requires that as soon as an attorney for a party becomes aware of the existence of a related case
or cases, such attorney shall immediately notify, in writing, the Judges on whose calendars the cases appear and shall serve such notice
on counsel for all other parties.
_______________

The plaintiff , defendant or counsel must complete the following:

I. RELATIONSHIP OF NEW CASE TO PENDING RELATED CASE(S).

A new case is deemed related to a case pending in this or another U.S. Court if the new case: [Check appropriate box(e=s)
below.]

[ ] (a) relates to common property

[ ] (b) involves common issues of fact

[ ] (c) grows out of the same event or transaction

[ ] (d) involves the validity or infringement of the same patent

[ ] (e) is filed by the same pro se litigant

2. RELATIONSHIP OF NEW CASE TO DISMISSED RELATED CASE(ES)

A new case is deemed related to a case dismissed, with or without prejudice, in this or any other U.S. Court, if the new case
involves the same parties and same subject matter.

Check box if new case is related to a dismissed case: [ ]

3. NAME THE UNITED STATES COURT IN WHICH THE RELATED CASE IS FILED (IF OTHER THAN THIS
COURT):
SEE NEXT PAGE
________________________________________________________________________________________________

4. CAPTION AND CASE NUMBER OF RELATED CASE(E=S). IF MORE ROOM IS NEED PLEASE USE OTHER SIDE.
SEE NEXT PAGE
____________________________________ v. ____________________________ C.A. No._________
DEC 21, 2009
_________________________ _______________________________________________
DATE Signature of Plaintiff /Defendant (or counsel) USDCDC
CO-392
301OF
OF46
2
PAGE 30
FAMILY COURT 311TH
01. VICTOR DEL RIO V. TRACEY DEL RIO, NO. 2008-02476 (DISMISSED)
02. VICTOR DEL RIO V. TRACEY DEL RIO, NO. 2008-03143 (DISMISSED)
03. TRACEY DEL RIO V. VICTOR DEL RIO, NO. 2000-27121 (CONTESTED)

APPEALS - STATE
04. VICTOR DEL RIO V. TRACEY DEL RIO, NO. 01-08-00993-CV, DENIED ALL RELIEF
05. VICTOR DEL RIO V. DOUG WARNE INDIVIDUALLY ...,
NO. 01-08-00993-CV, DENIED ALL RELIEF
06. VICTOR DEL RIO V. ELIZABETH PAGEL, NO. 01-08-00993-CV, DENIED ALL RELIEF
07. In re VICTOR DEL RIO, NO. 01-08-00993-CV, DENIED ALL RELIEF

CIVIL COURT
07. N. DEL RIO, bnf VICTOR DEL RIO V. SPRING INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT,
NO. H073937, UNHEARD, TRACEY DEL RIO INTERFERED WITH WITNESS
08. USA V. CITY OF HOUSTON, HARRIS COUNTY & TEXAS, NO. 2009-17355, DENIED ALL
RELIEF-DECLARED VEXATIOUS LITIGANT-PENDING MOREHEARINGS IN 2010.
Hon. Judge Randy Wilson, Court Phone: (713) 368-6230
09. UNKNOWN, FALSE CHARGES OF HIRING HOOKER HANDLED BY EX-EMPLOYER (FTCA claim)
10. UNKNOWN, FALSELY CHARGED WITH THEFT BY ANOTHER EX-EMPLOYER (FTCA claim)

FEDERAL COURT
10. VICTOR DEL RIO V. DENISE DREXLER & TRACEY DEL RIO, NO. 409MC00076,
DENIED ALL RELIEF except IFP
11. VICTOR DEL RIO V. TRACEY DEL RIO, NO. 409MC00076, WANT OF JURISDICTION
12. VICTOR DEL RIO V. US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, NO. H-09-1651, HEARINGS IN MARCH
2010, DENIED ALL RELIEF except IFP

TEXAS SUPREME COURT


12. In re Victor Del Rio, NO. 08-0896 (DENIED HABEAS CORPUS, WITHDREW W/O PREJ)
13. UNITED STATES V. Tracey Del Rio & Douglas Warne individually & in his/her
official capacity as Administrative Judge in Family Division in Harris
County, NO. 09-0963 DENIED ANY POSSIBILITY OF A HEARING

US SUPREME COURT
14. VICTOR DEL RIO V. TEXAS et al, NO. 09-6398, DENIED ALL RELIEF except IFP

US COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS


15. VICTOR DEL RIO V. UNITED STATES, NO. 09-130C, DENIED ALL RELIEF except IFP

5TH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS


16. In re Victor Del Rio, NO. 09-20232, DENIED ALL RELIEF except IFP

STATE COURT, TRAVIS COUNTY


17. VICTOR DEL RIO V. DENISE DREXLER, NO. D-1-GN-09-000882, DENIED ALL RELIEF except
IFP

OTHER
18. CPS cases in 2007-2008 No.s 26492443 & 26550760 confirm SON is being neglected,

nervous and frightened (having been in his mother's custody for weeks after she
suddenly discontinues PETITIONER'S every other week custody (since 2006) & home

schooling (from Sep 2007 - Dec 16 2007), symptoms of mental retardation, agents
suspicion TRACEY is lying about PETITIONER, DENISE DREXLER is listed as
COLLATERAL CONTACT but redacted from reports, earlier copies FALSELY ACCUSE
PETITIONER having meth lab near home,

USDCDC
CO-392
312OF
OF46
2
PAGE 31
EX PARTE

IN THE HONORABLE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT OF D.C.

PURSUANT TO CIVIL RIGHTS ACT OF 1871 'to override certain

PURSUANT TO 28 USC § 2254, The Supreme Court, a Justice thereof, a circuit


judge, or a district court shall entertain an application for a writ of
habeas corpus in behalf of a person in custody pursuant to the judgment
of a State court only on the ground that he is in custody in violation of
the Constitution or laws or treaties of the United States.

DCSup WoHC 2 of 8 USDCDC 32 OF 46


EX PARTE

DCSup WoHC 3 of 8 USDCDC 33 OF 46


EX PARTE

DCSup WoHC 4 of 8 USDCDC 34 OF 46


EX PARTE

DCSup WoHC 5 of 8 USDCDC 35 OF 46


DCSup WoHC 6 of 8 USDCDC 36 OF 46
DCSup WoHC 7 of 8 USDCDC 37 OF 46
DCSup WoHC 8 of 8 USDCDC 38 OF 46
USDCDC 39 OF 46
USDCDC 40 OF 46
USDCDC 41 OF 46
USDCDC 42 OF 46
USDCDC 43 OF 46
USDCDC 44 OF 46
2427 Pinpoint Drive
Spring, TX 77373
Ph: 713-359-0494
Fx: 515-474-2415
victordelrio@netzero.com
Jan 03, 2009

TEA Customer Service Complaint Process


Division of Human Resources
TEA Customer Service Representative
1701 North Congress Ave, Room 1-101
Austin, TX 78701-1494
Phone (512) 463-8200

My complaint is regarding Executive Director of Special Services for Spring Independent

School District, Denise Drexler.

In 2006, she openly asked my ex-wife, Tracey Del Rio, if our son, Nicholas, would need

transportation if I “were no longer available” in three different ARD meetings.

Since that time, there have been attempts on my life and liberty: twice in February 2008

(life), October 30 (liberty), and November 2008 (life).

Denise Drexler is obviously collaborating with Family Judge Warne who has removed all

my parental rights and access to my son. I’ve since filed a Sect 1983 case against him in

1st Court of Appeals.

I consider this attached Disclaimer also a threat.

This leaves me no choice but to file suit for the safety of me and my son. I’ll trust you look

into this matter quickly, for your sake.

Very best regards,

Victor Del Rio

1 of 2 USDCDC 45 OF 46
2 of 2 USDCDC 46 OF 46