Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Page
8
Source Legend:
Decorative Surface of
Attachment & Functional Parts to the
Exterior and Interior of Automobiles
Type of characteristic
No. 1:
Offset
No. 2:
Burn marks
No. 3:
Dents
Page
Type of characteristic
No. 28: Various polishing defects
No. 5:
Impression marks
No. 6:
Anodising splits
No. 7:
Colour misting
No. 8:
Colour differences
No. 9:
Swollen edges
10
11
12
13
14
15
1) Anodizing
2) Powder coating (EPS)
3) Wet painting
4) Extrusion
5) Injection moulding
6) Galvanizing
16
Page 1 of 17
16
Decorative Surface of
Attachment & Functional Parts to the
Exterior and Interior of Automobiles
No. 1: Offset
Data:
Definition: Misalignment where parts are structured (for example,
by vulcanisation or over-moulding).
Process allocation: 5, 8, 12, 13, 15
Examples of permissible characteristic features:
Zone A: Visible and detectable by touch +/- 0.3 mm
Zone B: +/- 0.7 mm
No. 3: Dents
Data:
Definition: Flat bubble-like depressions, caused by high pressure.
Process allocation: 6, 8 -16
Examples of permissible characteristic features:
Zone A: Not acceptable if visible at a distance of > 800 mm
Zone B: Not acceptable if visible at a distance of > 1200 mm
Source Legend:
1) Anodizing
2) Powder coating (EPS)
3) Wet painting
4) Extrusion
5) Injection moulding
6) Galvanizing
Page 2 of 17
Dokument wurde bereitgestellt fr Gerhard Alois Schneider vom
VDA-QMC Internetportal am 19.05.2009 um 17:13
16
Decorative Surface of
Attachment & Functional Parts to the
Exterior and Interior of Automobiles
Source Legend:
1) Anodizing
2) Powder coating (EPS)
3) Wet painting
4) Extrusion
5) Injection moulding
6) Galvanizing
Page 3 of 17
Dokument wurde bereitgestellt fr Gerhard Alois Schneider vom
VDA-QMC Internetportal am 19.05.2009 um 17:13
16
Decorative Surface of
Attachment & Functional Parts to the
Exterior and Interior of Automobiles
Process allocation: 2, 3, 6, 13
Examples of permissible characteristic features:
Zone A: Deviation refer to MTP sample(s)
Zone B: Refer to MTP sample(s)
Source Legend:
1) Anodizing
2) Powder coating (EPS)
3) Wet painting
4) Extrusion
5) Injection moulding
6) Galvanizing
Page 4 of 17
Dokument wurde bereitgestellt fr Gerhard Alois Schneider vom
VDA-QMC Internetportal am 19.05.2009 um 17:13
16
Decorative Surface of
Attachment & Functional Parts to the
Exterior and Interior of Automobiles
Source Legend:
1) Anodizing
2) Powder coating (EPS)
3) Wet painting
4) Extrusion
5) Injection moulding
6) Galvanizing
Page 5 of 17
Dokument wurde bereitgestellt fr Gerhard Alois Schneider vom
VDA-QMC Internetportal am 19.05.2009 um 17:13
16
Decorative Surface of
Attachment & Functional Parts to the
Exterior and Interior of Automobiles
Source Legend:
1) Anodizing
2) Powder coating (EPS)
3) Wet painting
4) Extrusion
5) Injection moulding
6) Galvanizing
Page 6 of 17
Dokument wurde bereitgestellt fr Gerhard Alois Schneider vom
VDA-QMC Internetportal am 19.05.2009 um 17:13
16
Decorative Surface of
Attachment & Functional Parts to the
Exterior and Interior of Automobiles
Source Legend:
1) Anodizing
2) Powder coating (EPS)
3) Wet painting
4) Extrusion
5) Injection moulding
6) Galvanizing
Page 7 of 17
Dokument wurde bereitgestellt fr Gerhard Alois Schneider vom
VDA-QMC Internetportal am 19.05.2009 um 17:13
16
Decorative Surface of
Attachment & Functional Parts to the
Exterior and Interior of Automobiles
No illustration available
Source Legend:
1) Anodizing
2) Powder coating (EPS)
3) Wet painting
4) Extrusion
5) Injection moulding
6) Galvanizing
Page 8 of 17
Dokument wurde bereitgestellt fr Gerhard Alois Schneider vom
VDA-QMC Internetportal am 19.05.2009 um 17:13
16
Decorative Surface of
Attachment & Functional Parts to the
Exterior and Interior of Automobiles
Source Legend:
1) Anodizing
2) Powder coating (EPS)
3) Wet painting
4) Extrusion
5) Injection moulding
6) Galvanizing
Page 9 of 17
Dokument wurde bereitgestellt fr Gerhard Alois Schneider vom
VDA-QMC Internetportal am 19.05.2009 um 17:13
16
Decorative Surface of
Attachment & Functional Parts to the
Exterior and Interior of Automobiles
Source Legend:
1) Anodizing
2) Powder coating (EPS)
3) Wet painting
4) Extrusion
5) Injection moulding
6) Galvanizing
Page 10 of 17
Dokument wurde bereitgestellt fr Gerhard Alois Schneider vom
VDA-QMC Internetportal am 19.05.2009 um 17:13
16
Decorative Surface of
Attachment & Functional Parts to the
Exterior and Interior of Automobiles
No illustration available
Process allocation: 4, 8
Examples of permissible characteristic features:
Zone A: Refer to MTP sample(s)
Zone B: Refer to MTP sample(s)
Page 11 of 17
Dokument wurde bereitgestellt fr Gerhard Alois Schneider vom
VDA-QMC Internetportal am 19.05.2009 um 17:13
16
Decorative Surface of
Attachment & Functional Parts to the
Exterior and Interior of Automobiles
Process allocation: 3, 6, 7, 9, 13
Examples of permissible characteristic features:
Zone A: Refer to MTP sample(s)
Zone B: Refer to MTP sample(s)
Page 12 of 17
Dokument wurde bereitgestellt fr Gerhard Alois Schneider vom
VDA-QMC Internetportal am 19.05.2009 um 17:13
16
Decorative Surface of
Attachment & Functional Parts to the
Exterior and Interior of Automobiles
Source Legend:
1) Anodizing
2) Powder coating (EPS)
3) Wet painting
4) Extrusion
5) Injection moulding
6) Galvanizing
Page 13 of 17
Dokument wurde bereitgestellt fr Gerhard Alois Schneider vom
VDA-QMC Internetportal am 19.05.2009 um 17:13
16
Decorative Surface of
Attachment & Functional Parts to the
Exterior and Interior of Automobiles
No illustration available
Source Legend:
1) Anodizing
2) Powder coating (EPS)
3) Wet painting
4) Extrusion
5) Injection moulding
6) Galvanizing
Page 14 of 17
Dokument wurde bereitgestellt fr Gerhard Alois Schneider vom
VDA-QMC Internetportal am 19.05.2009 um 17:13
16
Decorative Surface of
Attachment & Functional Parts to the
Exterior and Interior of Automobiles
Source Legend:
1) Anodizing
2) Powder coating (EPS)
3) Wet painting
4) Extrusion
5) Injection moulding
6) Galvanizing
Page 15 of 17
Dokument wurde bereitgestellt fr Gerhard Alois Schneider vom
VDA-QMC Internetportal am 19.05.2009 um 17:13
16
Decorative Surface of
Attachment & Functional Parts to the
Exterior and Interior of Automobiles
Source Legend:
1) Anodizing
2) Powder coating (EPS)
3) Wet painting
4) Extrusion
5) Injection moulding
6) Galvanizing
Page 16 of 17
Dokument wurde bereitgestellt fr Gerhard Alois Schneider vom
VDA-QMC Internetportal am 19.05.2009 um 17:13
16
Decorative Surface of
Attachment & Functional Parts to the
Exterior and Interior of Automobiles
Imprint
VDA QMC
Qualitts Management Center
im Verband der Automobilindustrie
VDA QMC
An den Drei Hasen 31
D-61440 Oberursel
GERMANY
Phone:
Fax:
E-Mail:
Web:
Version 1.0
Source Legend:
1) Anodizing
2) Powder coating (EPS)
3) Wet painting
4) Extrusion
5) Injection moulding
6) Galvanizing
Page 17 of 17
Dokument wurde bereitgestellt fr Gerhard Alois Schneider vom
VDA-QMC Internetportal am 19.05.2009 um 17:13
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
The 95% UCL and 95% LCL represent the 95% upper and lower confidence limits on the
binomial distribution. The Calculated Score is the basic computation reported on the report
page for % Appraiser and % Score vs Attribute. The 95% confidence interval represents
the range within which the true Calculated Score lies given the uncertainty associated with
limited sample sizes. As sample size increases (in this case, Total Inspected) the
confidence interval will get smaller and smaller which indicates more reliable estimates of
the true percentages. In the case of the Demo data, the true Calculated score for Operator 1
could be as low as 76.8% given that only 14 samples inspected, even though there was a 100%
Appraiser value calculated. Also, even though Operator 2 had a lower score, Operators 1 and 3
cannot be distinguished from Operator 2 because the calculated score of #2 (78.6%) lies within
the confidence limits for Operators 1 and 3.
With a worksheet limitation of 100 samples, at best a lower 95% limit of 96.4% can be calculated.
Thus, we would have to say that an inspector could be as bad as 96% efficient, even though he/she
missed no calls.
Sample Size
# Matches
95% UCL
Calculated Score
95% LCL
30
30
100,0%
100,0%
88,4%
< Try out different combinations of number of samples and number of matches
< to see the effects of sample size. In this case, a sample size of 30 with
< one non-match will yield a 17% confidence interval. In order to get reasonable
< reliability in estimates of efficiency, large sample sizes will be required.
Page 1 of 5
Attributiven_Gage_R&R-Studie
Dokument wurde bereitgestellt fr Gerhard Alois Schneider vom
VDA-QMC Internetportal am 19.05.2009 um 17:13
Data Entry
Attribute Legend
(used in computations)
1 Pass
2 Fail
Known Population
Sample #
Attribute
1
Pass
2
Pass
3
Pass
4
Pass
5
Fail
6
Fail
7
Pass
8
Pass
9
Fail
10
Pass
11
Pass
12
Pass
13
Pass
14
Pass
15
Fail
16
Pass
17
Pass
18
Pass
19
Fail
20
Pass
21
Pass
22
Pass
23
Pass
24
Pass
25
Fail
26
Pass
27
Pass
28
Pass
29
Fail
30
Pass
31
99
100
Operator #1
Try #1
Try #2
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Fail
Fail
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Fail
Fail
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Fail
Fail
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Fail
Fail
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Fail
Fail
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Fail
Fail
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Fail
Fail
Pass
Pass
(2)
->
DATE:
NAME:
PRODUCT:
BUSINESS:
04.01.2001
Acme Employee
Widgets
All operators
Earth Products
Operator #2
Try #1
Try #2
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Fail
Fail
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Fail
Fail
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Fail
Fail
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Fail
Fail
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Fail
Fail
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Fail
Fail
Pass
Pass
Operator #3
Try #1
Try #2
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Fail
Pass
Pass
Fail
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Fail
Fail
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Fail
Pass
Pass
Fail
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Fail
Fail
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Fail
Pass
Fail
Fail
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Fail
Fail
Pass
Pass
100,00%
100,00%
83,33%
93,33%
96,67%
80,00%
All Operators
between each
agree with
Other
standard
Y/N
Agree
Y
Y
Y
N
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y/N
Agree
Y
Y
Y
N
N
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
80,00%
(4)
->
76,67%
Note:
Operator agrees with him/herself on both trials
Operator agrees on both trials with the known standard
(3) All operators agreed within and between themselves
(4) All operators agreed within and between themselves AND agreed with the known standard
(5) Enter Pass/Fail, Good/Bad, Accept/Reject or other labels which indicate status of inspection
(1)
(2)
Page 2 of 5
Attributiven_Gage_R&R-Studie
Dokument wurde bereitgestellt fr Gerhard Alois Schneider vom
VDA-QMC Internetportal am 19.05.2009 um 17:13
Report
Attribute Gage R & R Effectiveness
SCORING REPORT
DATE:
NAME:
PRODUCT:
BUSINESS:
Attribute Legend
1 Pass
2 Fail
Known Population
Sample #
Attribute
1
Pass
2
Pass
3
Pass
4
Pass
5
Fail
6
Fail
7
Pass
8
Pass
9
Fail
10
Pass
11
Pass
12
Pass
13
Pass
14
Pass
15
Fail
16
Pass
17
Pass
18
Pass
19
Fail
20
Pass
21
Pass
22
Pass
23
Pass
24
Pass
25
Fail
26
Pass
27
Pass
28
Pass
29
Fail
30
Pass
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
-
Operator #1
Try #1
Try #2
04.01.2001
Acme Employee
Widgets
Earth Products
Operator #2
Try #1
Try #2
All operators
agree within and All Operators
between each
agree with
Other
standard
Operator #3
Try #1
Try #2
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Fail
Pass
Fail
Fail
Fail
Fail
Pass
Fail
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Fail
Fail
Fail
Fail
Fail
Fail
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Fail
Pass
Fail
Fail
Fail
Fail
Pass
Fail
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Fail
Fail
Fail
Fail
Fail
Fail
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Fail
Fail
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Fail
Pass
Fail
Fail
Fail
Fail
Fail
Fail
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Fail
Fail
Fail
Fail
Fail
Fail
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
100,00%
93,33%
100,00%
96,67%
Y/N
Agree
Y
Y
Y
N
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y/N
Agree
Y
Y
Y
N
N
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
83,33%
80,00%
Page 3 of 5
Attributiven_Gage_R&R-Studie
04.01.2001
Acme Employee
Widgets
Earth Products
% Appraiser1
Operator #1 Operator #2 Operator #3
30
30
30
30
30
25
Source
Total Inspected
# Matched
False Negative (operator rejected good product)
False Positive (operator accepted bad product)
Mixed
95% UCL
100,0%
100,0%
Calculated Score
100,0%
100,0%
95% LCL
88,4%
88,4%
Total Inspected
# in Agreement
95% UCL
Calculated Score
95% LCL
1
1
0
99,2%
93,3%
77,9%
95% UCL
Calculated Score
95% LCL
110,0%
110,0%
90,0%
80,0%
80,0%
70,0%
70,0%
% Efficiency
100,0%
40,0%
60,0%
50,0%
40,0%
30,0%
30,0%
20,0%
20,0%
10,0%
10,0%
0,0%
95% UCL
Calculated Score
95% LCL
% Score vs Appraiser
90,0%
50,0%
0
1
5
92,3%
80,0%
61,4%
90,1%
76,7%
57,7%
100,0%
60,0%
0
1
0
99,9%
96,7%
82,8%
92,3%
80,0%
61,4%
% Appraiser
% Efficiency
94,4%
83,3%
65,3%
%Score vs Attribute2
Operator #1 Operator #2 Operator #3
30
30
30
28
29
24
0,0%
Operator #1
Operator #2
Operator #3
Operator #1
Operator #2
Operator #3
Notes
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
Page 4 of 5
Attributiven_Gage_R&R-Studie
Dokument wurde bereitgestellt fr Gerhard Alois Schneider vom
VDA-QMC Internetportal am 19.05.2009 um 17:13
Calculations
Known Population
Sample #
Attribute
1
1
2
1
3
1
4
1
5
2
6
2
7
1
8
1
9
2
10
1
11
1
12
1
13
1
14
1
15
2
16
1
17
1
18
1
19
2
20
1
21
1
22
1
23
1
24
1
25
2
26
1
27
1
28
1
29
2
30
1
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
% Appraiser Score
Operator #1
Try #1
Try #2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
1
1
100,00%
Operator #2
Try #1
Try #2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
1
1
100,00%
Operator #3
Try #1
Try #2
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
1
1
Y/N
Agree
TRUE
TRUE
TRUE
FALSE
FALSE
TRUE
TRUE
TRUE
TRUE
TRUE
TRUE
TRUE
TRUE
FALSE
FALSE
TRUE
TRUE
TRUE
TRUE
TRUE
TRUE
FALSE
TRUE
FALSE
TRUE
TRUE
TRUE
TRUE
TRUE
TRUE
Y/N
Agree
TRUE
TRUE
TRUE
FALSE
FALSE
FALSE
TRUE
TRUE
TRUE
TRUE
TRUE
TRUE
TRUE
FALSE
FALSE
TRUE
TRUE
TRUE
TRUE
TRUE
TRUE
FALSE
TRUE
FALSE
TRUE
TRUE
TRUE
TRUE
TRUE
TRUE
83,33%
Page 5 of 5
Attributiven_Gage_R&R-Studie