Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Institute of Physics, Silesian University of Technology, ul. Krasiskiego 8, 40-019 Katowice, Poland
Department of Biophysics, Agricultural University SGGW, ul. Nowoursynowska 159, 02-776 Warsaw, Poland
Received 11 December 2008; accepted 2 March 2009; published online 21 April 2009
Twelve methods of determining energy band gap Eg of semiconductors using diffuse reflectance
spectroscopy have been applied in investigations of sonochemically produced antimony sulfoiodide
SbSI consisting of nanowires. It has been proved that the best method of determining Eg is based
on simultaneous fitting of many mechanisms of absorption to the spectral dependence of Kubelka
Munk function evaluated from the diffuse reflectance data. It allows determining the values of
indirect forbidden Eg, the Urbach energy, and the constant absorption/scattering of the examined
semiconductor. 2009 American Institute of Physics. DOI: 10.1063/1.3103603
Optical absorption spectra have been extensively used as
one of the most important tools for probing the energy gaps
Eg and band structures of semiconductors.1 There are several methods for measuring them. These include diffuse reflectance spectroscopy DRS. When a material, consisting
of many particles, or nanoparticles, is illuminated, some of
the impinging radiation penetrates the sample and some is
reflected from its surface. The portion that penetrates the
sample is scattered at a large number of points in its path as
well as it is transmitted through the particles a number of
times. Only the part of this radiation that is returned to the
surface of the sample and comes back out is considered to be
diffuse reflection.2
DRS is a suitable, not destructive, and simple method of
investigation, especially important in examinations of porous, nanocrystalline materials and gels.3 It is impossible to
examine such materials applying specular reflection and it is
also extremely difficult to determine the path length in an
optical transmittance of them. The following factors are related to high spectral quality of diffuse reflectance: dilution
of the sample with a nonabsorbing matrix ensures a deeper
penetration of the incident beam into the sample, which increases the contribution of the scattered component in the
spectrum and minimizes the specular reflection component;
and smaller particles improve the quality of DRS spectra.
However, there is no one reliable method for determining Eg while applying the DRS. The already used methods of
DRS investigations have been applied in this paper to determine Eg of ultrasonically prepared nanowires of antimony
sulfoiodide SbSI. The SbSI being a semiconducting ferroelectric has an unusually large number of interesting properties that have been reviewed in a few monographs but they
are still investigated see the literature in, e.g., Ref. 3.
The SbSI xerogel consisting of nanowires was prepared
sonochemically from the elements Sb, S, and I. The used
experimental set up and the applied procedure were the same
as described in Ref. 3. Characterization of the xerogel was
done using powder x-ray diffraction, scanning electron microscopy, energy dispersive x-ray analysis, high-resolution
a
0034-6748/2009/804/046107/3/$25.00
A = d = log
Istandard
= logRd,
Idiffuse
where d is absorption path length and represents absorption coefficient of radiation. The Eg was derived as the intersection point between lines that extrapolate the absorbances
in the small h range and at the linear absorption edge Fig.
2 in the supplementary material5.
Method 4 see, e.g., Ref. 8: the Eg was determined by
the intersection point Fig. 3a in the supplementary
80, 046107-1
046107-2
TABLE I. Comparison of the values of energy gap of SbSI nanowires determined using different techniques of diffusive reflection spectroscopy.
Eg
eV
1 Rdh2 h
=
,
2Rdh
S
where S is the scattering factor. In some cases, S is approximately equal to unity for very small participles or it is
constant e.g., when thickness of the sample is much bigger
than the individual participle see, e.g., Refs. 4 and 812.
Method 5 see, e.g., Ref. 9: sometimes, also in the small h
range, FKM has values much larger than zero.9 Therefore, Eg
was determined as the intersection point between lines that
extrapolate FKM values in the small h range and at the linear
absorption edge Fig. 3b in the supplementary material5.
Method 6 see, e.g., Refs. 4 and 8: the Eg was determined as
the energy coordinate of the point on the low energy side of
FKM curve at which the linear increase starts Fig. 3c in the
supplementary material5. However, this method is very
ambiguousit is difficult to determine uncertainty of Eg
value. Method 7 see, e.g., Ref. 10: The Eg was evaluated as
the intersection point between lines that extrapolate FKM values in the high h range and at the linear absorption edge
Fig. 3d in the supplementary material5.
Method 8 see, e.g., Ref. 10: some more information
about Eg can be obtained by McLean analysis of the absorption edge. The threshold of continuous optical absorption can
be explained by the quantum mechanical perturbation theory
of electron-photon interaction. For different transition
mechanisms, it has been proved that along the sharp absorption edge, the energy of incident photons, and Eg of a semiconductor can have, i.e., such simple relations as
n = A1h Eg
3a
hn = A2h Eg,
3b
or
where index n depends on the interband transition mechanism. The values of n equal 2 or 2/3 imply a direct allowed
or direct forbidden transition, respectively. If n = 1 / 2 or
n = 1 / 3, the interband transition is indirect allowed or indirect
forbidden, respectively. Generally the best fitting for differ-
No. of the
method
2.234
2.111
2.08
11
2.05
2.04
1.981
1.971
1.921
1.901
1.821
1.811
12
1.761
10
046107-3
2 = FKMhi B jhi
i=1
1 = A60h EgIf3
2 = AU exp
h
,
EU
for h EgIf ,
5a
5b
SbSI nanowires
Powdered bulk
single crystals of SbSIa
B A60, 1 / eV3 m
EgIf, eV
B AU, 1/m
EU, eV
B A0, 1/m
45.2824
1.811
2.796 104
0.5717
0.04881
35.2027
1.7931
2.527 109
0.1035
0.014117
Reference 3.