Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
School of Postgraduate Medical and Dental Education, Cardiff University, University Dental Hospital and School, Heath Park, Cardiff, UK,
Cardiff Unit for Research and Evaluation in Medical and Dental Education (CUREMeDE), School of Social Science, Cardiff University, Glamorgan Building, Cardiff, UK,
Institute of Dentistry, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
Keywords
continuing professional development;
continuing education; dentistry.
Correspondence
Jonathan G. Cowpe
Dental Postgraduate Section,
Wales Deanery - School of Postgraduate
Medical and Dental Education
Neuadd Meirionnydd
Heath Park
Cardiff CF14 4YS, UK
Tel: +44 (0)29 2074 4317
Fax: +44 (0)29 2074 3960
e-mail: cowpeJG@cardiff.ac.uk
Abstract
Aim: To summarise findings from a literature review of dentists engagement in
continuing professional development (CPD) and its effects on improving oral health
care for patients.
Method: The search strategy used key terms in a range of databases and an academic
literature search engine, complemented by hand searching and citation follow-up.
Results: One hundred and fourteen papers were reviewed. The majority of dentists
engaged in CPD. Factors affecting participation included time since graduation, costs,
work and home commitments, postgraduate qualification, interest and convenience.
Learning needs identification and reflection on practice were rarely evidenced. Common modes of CPD were courses and journal reading; no one delivery method proved
more effective. Few papers directly explored recommendations for topics although
suggestions related to common areas of error and gaps in knowledge or skill. Studies
of CPD effectiveness and impact-on-practice suggested that courses can result in widespread new learning and considerable self-reported change in practice. However, significant barriers to implementing change in workplace practice were noted and included
availability of materials, resources and support from colleagues.
Conclusion: To ensure high standards of care, alongside recommending core or mandatory topics, more attention should be given to reflection on learning needs, the learners readiness to engage with education and training and the influence of the
workplace environment.
Introduction
Key competences required of the new dental graduate and a
European perspective on the quality assurance of undergraduate
education have been established (1). In the context of changing
patterns of oral health needs (2), an increasingly wide range of
health issues (3) and higher patient expectations (46), practitioners need to develop a wider knowledge base than that
which can be provided by undergraduate training alone (610).
Continuing professional development (CPD) is the mechanism
by which dental practitioners develop their skills and knowl*Article reproduced from Eur J Dent Educ 16 (2012) 166178
2013 John Wiley & Sons A/S
Eur J Dent Educ 17 (Suppl. 1) (2013) 517
Barnes et al.
Method
As well as searching for papers in the scientific, medical and
nursing databases (Web of Science; OVID Medline; EMBASE;
CINAHL; SCOPUS Life Sciences, Health Sciences, Physical Sciences and Social Sciences & Humanities), others were included
to capture educational (ERIC after 1996; British Education
Index) or social sciences and psychology aspects (ISI Web of
Knowledge; ASSIA after 1987; PsychInfo). Unless otherwise
indicated, there was no date limit initially, although papers
published prior to 1990 were later excluded. An academic literature search engine (Google Scholar) was also utilised. This
search was conducted in the UK and complemented by one
undertaken by colleagues in Finland who searched four databases (OVID Medline; EBM Reviews ACP Journal Club 1991
Databases
searched
Results
4310 papers
retrieved
2546 duplicates
removed
1764
titles/abstracts
screened
118
papers
relevant
1646
papers
excluded
32 could not
access
26 from
other
sources
103 full
papers
9
abstracts
only
114
sources
included
Comprising:
83 empirical papers
8 reports
7 literature reviews
4 opinion pieces
12 topic summaries
Country
UK
Ireland
Worldwide
UK
USA
UK
Ireland
UK
UK
USA
Saudi Arabia
Northern Ireland
Switzerland
Authors
Al Fouzan (36)
Questionnaire, no n given
Questionnaire, 90 responses
Questionnaire 24 returns
Geneva
Context, subjects
TABLE 1. Studies reporting amount of continuing professional development (CPD) undertaken by dental practitioners
Key findings
Barnes et al.
Review of CPD for dentists
8
Country
Australia
Ireland
Mongolia
UK
UK
Hong Kong
Greece
Italy
Australia
Authors
TABLE 1. Continued
Questionnaire 21 returns
Dentists on register
Context, subjects
Key findings
Barnes et al.
10
USA
UK
UK
UK
UK
Australia
UK
Ireland
UK
UK
UK
Ireland
UK
USA
Mongolia
USA
Bean (45)
Country
Authors
Questionnaire
n/a
Context, subjects
TABLE 2. Studies reporting factors relating to continuing professional development (CPD) uptake
Key findings
Greece
Australia
Ireland
Australia
John and Parashos (54)
Questionnaire 21 returns
Audit
Australia
Best et al. (16)
USA
Christensen (53)
Questionnaire, n undisclosed
Country
Opinion article
Authors
TABLE 2. Continued
Context, subjects
Key findings
Barnes et al.
12
Ireland
UK
USA
Australia
UK
UK
UK
Australia
Australia
Renehan (58)
Johnson (59)
Best and Messer (39)
Australia
UK
UK
Australia
Canada
Country
Authors
Summary paper
Questionnaire 75 returns
Questionnaire 8 returns
Questionnaire 396 returns,
review of records
Questionnaire
Questionnaire 16 returns
Context, subjects
TABLE 3. Studies reporting reasons for choosing continuing professional development (CPD) activity
Key findings
Barnes et al.
Discussion
In the context of movement of graduate dentists across countries within the EU, there is a clear need to review education
and training provided through CPD, so that patients can be
assured of high quality care as a result of dentists undertaking
additional education and training. That review of undergraduate education has been undertaken by the DentEd programme
(99101). Following that, the DentCPD project has focused on
CPD and this review is part of that project.
13
Barnes et al.
Conclusion
Our review has described the range of factors that have been
found to affect participation in CPD. We have noted that a
variety of modes of CPD delivery are available and that the
level of learner engagement and the match with learning need
can make a difference to the effectiveness of the CPD. It can be
hard for dentists to implement change in practice but they can
be helped by supportive colleagues. The discussion draws on
the medical education literature in better understanding how
dental CPD may lead to improved patient care. We conclude
2013 John Wiley & Sons A/S
Eur J Dent Educ 17 (Suppl. 1) (2013) 517
Barnes et al.
that more attention should be given to the importance of practitioner reflection, the state of the learners readiness to engage
with education and training and the influence of the workplace
environment.
Acknowledgements
This review was undertaken as part of the DentCPD project,
supported by colleagues in the University of Helsinki (Kimmo
Suomalanien), National and Kapodistrian University of Athens
(Argyro Kavadella, Anastassia Kosioni), Academic Centre for
Dentistry, Amsterdam (Henk Kersten, Eva Povel), Association
for Dental Education in Europe (Majella Giles, Damien Walmsley) and Riga Stradins University (Una Soboleva, Ilze Akota,
Andra Liepa) and part funded by the European Commission
(#509961-LLP-1-2010-1-UK-ERASMUS-EMHE). The authors
would like to thank Wendy Hardyman (CUREMeDE) for her
critical comment.
References
1 Cowpe J, Plasschaert A, Harzer W, Vinkka-Puhakka H, Walmsley
AD. Profile and competences for the graduating European dentist
update 2009. Eur J Dental Educ 2010: 14: 193202.
2 Office for National Statistics. Adult Dental Health Survey. London:
HMSO, 1998.
3 Low DS, Kalkwarf KL. Assessing continued competency: an
approach for dentistry. J Am Dent Assoc (1939) 1996: 127: 383388.
4 Burke F, Wilson N, Christensen G, Cheung S, Brunton P. Contemporary dental practice in the UK: demographic data and practising
arrangements. Br Dent J 2005: 198: 3943.
5 Eaton K, Plasschaert A, Toh C, Grayden S, Senakola E, Rohlin M.
A survey of continuing professional education for orthodontists in
23 European countries. J Orthod 2000: 27: 273278.
6 Sanz M, Widstrom E, Eaton K. Is there a need for a common
framework of dental specialties in Europe? Eur J Dental Educ
2008: 12: 138143.
7 Mossey P. The changing face of dental education. Br Dent J 2004:
197: 35.
8 Christensen GJ. Dealing with the increasing need for continuing
education. J Am Dent Assoc 2007: 138: 387390.
9 Schleyer T, Eaton K, Mock D, Barach V. Comparison of dental
licensure, specialization and continuing education in five countries.
Eur J Dental Educ 2002: 6: 153161.
10 Chan WC, Ng CH, Yiu BK, et al. A survey on the preference for
continuing professional dental education amongst general dental
practitioners who attended the 26th Asia Pacific Dental Congress.
Eur J Dental Educ 2006: 10: 210216.
11 European Commission. Advisory Committee on the Training of
Dental Practitioners. Report and recommendation concerning
clinical proficiencies reuired for the practice of dentistry in the
European Union. Directorate General XV (XV/E/8316/7/93-EN).
Brussels: European Comission, 1996.
12 Tseveenjav B, Vehkalahti MM, Murtomaa H. Attendance at and
self-perceived need for continuing education among Mongolian
dentists. Eur J Dent Educ 2003: 7: 130135.
2013 John Wiley & Sons A/S
Eur J Dent Educ 17 (Suppl. 1) (2013) 517
15
16
Barnes et al.
Barnes et al.
98 Collado V, Nicolas E, Faulks D, et al. Evaluation of safe and effective administration of nitrous oxide after a postgraduate training
course. BMC Clin Pharmacol 2008: 8: art. no. 3.
99 Jones ML, Hobson RS, Plasschaert AJM, et al. Quality assurance
and benchmarking: an approach for European dental schools. Eur
J Dental Educ 2007: 11: 137143.
100 Plasschaert AJM, Lindh C, McLoughlin J, et al. Curriculum structure and the European credit transfer system for European dental
schools: Part I. Eur J Dental Educ 2006: 10: 123130.
101 Plasschaert AJM, Manogue M, Lindh C, et al. Curriculum content,
structure and ECTS for European dental schools. Part II: methods
of learning and teaching, assessment procedures and performance
criteria. Eur J Dental Educ 2007: 11: 125136.
102 Cochrane L, Olson C, Murray S, Dupuis M, Tooman T, Hayes S.
Gaps between knowing and doing: understanding and assessing the
barriers to optimal health care. J Contin Educ Health Prof 2007:
27: 94102.
103 Mansouri M, Lockyer J. A meta-analysis of continuing medical
education effectiveness. J Contin Educ Health Prof 2007: 27: 615.
104 Cantillon P, Jones R. Does continuing medical education in general practice make a difference? BMJ 1999: 318: 12761279.
105 Oxman A, Thomson M, Davis D, Haynes R. No magic bullets: a
systematic review of 105 trials of interventions to improve practice.
CMAJ 1995: 153: 14231431.
106 Regehr G, Mylopoulos M. Maintaining competence in the field:
learning about practice, through practice, in practice. J Contin
Educ Health Prof 2008: 1: S19S23.
107 Teunissen P, Dornan T. The competent novice: lifelong learning at
work. BMJ 2008: 336: 667669.
108 Eraut M. Learning from people in the workplace. Oxf Rev Educ
2007: 33: 403422.
109 Davis D, Thomson M, Freemantle N, Wolf F, Mazmanian P, Taylor-Vaisey A. Impact of formal continuing medical education.
JAMA 1999: 282: 867874.
110 Davis N, Davis D, Bloch R. Continuing medical education: AMEE
education guide no 35. Med Teach 2008: 30: 652666.
111 Grant J. Learning needs assessment: assessing the need. BMJ 2002:
324: 156159.
112 Mazmanian P, Davis D. Continuing medical education and the
physician as learner. JAMA 2002: 288: 10571060.
113 Parent R, Roy M, St Jacques D. A systems-based dynamic knowledge transfer capacity model. J Knowl Manage 2007: 11: 8193.
114 Hellman C, Johnson C, Dobson T. Taking action to stop violence:
a study on readiness to change among male batterers. J Fam Viol
2010: 25: 431438.
115 Prochaska J, DiClemente C, Norcross J. In search of how people
change: application to addictive behaviours. Am Psychol 1992: 47:
11021114.
116 Furze G, Pearcey P. Continuing education in nursing: a review of
the literature. J Adv Nurs 1999: 29: 355363.
17