1-1 : Test and CI for Two Variances: Type1, Type2_1

Method
Null hypothesis
Alternative hypothesis
Significance level

(Type1) / (Type2_1) = 1
(Type1) / (Type2_1) 1
= 0.05

F method was used. This method is accurate for normal data only.
Statistics
Variable
Type1
Type2_1

N
10
10

StDev
9.684
9.367

95% CI for
StDevs
(6.661, 17.680)
(6.443, 17.100)

Variance
93.789
87.733

Ratio of standard deviations = 1.034

Ratio of variances = 1.069
95% Confidence Intervals

Method
F

CI for StDev
Ratio
(0.515, 2.075)

CI for
Variance
Ratio
(0.266, 4.304)

Tests
Method
F

DF1
9

DF2
9

Test
Statistic
1.07

P-Value
0.922

1-2 : Paired T-Test and CI: K-Method, L-Method

Paired T for K-Method - L-Method
K-Method

N
9

Mean
1.3401

StDev
0.1460

SE Mean
0.0487

L-Method
Difference

9
9

1.0662
0.2739

0.0494
0.1351

0.0165
0.0450

95% CI for mean difference: (0.1700, 0.3777)

T-Test of mean difference = 0 (vs 0): T-Value = 6.08

P-Value = 0.000

Paired T-Test and CI: K-Method, L-Method

Paired T for K-Method - L-Method
N
9
9
9

K-Method
L-Method
Difference

Mean
1.3401
1.0662
0.2739

StDev
0.1460
0.0494
0.1351

SE Mean
0.0487
0.0165
0.0450

95% CI for mean difference: (0.1700, 0.3777)

T-Test of mean difference = 0 (vs 0): T-Value = 6.08

P-Value = 0.000

Boxplot of Differences
(with Ho and 95% t-confidence interval for the mean)

_
X
Ho

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

Differences

One-way ANOVA: Tensile STR versus Mix Tech

Method
Null hypothesis
Alternative hypothesis
Significance level

All means are equal

At least one mean is different
= 0.05

Equal variances were assumed for the analysis.

Factor Information
Factor
Mix Tech

Levels
15

Values
2600, 2700, 2765, 2800, 2865, 2890, 2900, 2975, 2985, 3000, 3050, 3129,
3150, 3200, 3300

Analysis of Variance
Source
Mix Tech
Error
Total

DF
14
1
15

Adj SS
630848
12800
643648

Adj MS
45061
12800

F-Value
3.52

P-Value
0.398

Model Summary
S
113.137

R-sq
98.01%

R-sq(adj)
70.17%

R-sq(pred)
*

Means
Mix Tech
2600
2700
2765
2800
2865
2890
2900
2975
2985
3000
3050
3129
3150
3200
3300

N
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1

Mean
2970.0
3150
2765
2865
2800
2600
2975
2900
2985
3200
2600
3129
2700
3000
3300

StDev
113.1
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*

95% CI
(1953.5, 3986.5)
( 1712,
4588)
( 1327,
4203)
( 1427,
4303)
( 1362,
4238)
( 1162,
4038)
( 1537,
4413)
( 1462,
4338)
( 1547,
4423)
( 1762,
4638)
( 1162,
4038)
( 1691,
4567)
( 1262,
4138)
( 1562,
4438)
( 1862,
4738)

Pooled StDev = 113.137

Interval Plot of Tensile STR vs Mix Tech

2-1: Fisher Pairwise Comparisons

Grouping Information Using the Fisher LSD Method and 95% Confidence
Mix Tech
3300
3000
2700
3129
3200
2985
2900
2600
2975
2800
2865
2765
3150
3050
2890

N
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1

Mean
3300
3200
3150
3129
3000
2985
2975
2970.0
2900
2865
2800
2765
2700
2600
2600

Grouping
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A

Means that do not share a letter are significantly different.

Interval Plot of Tensile STR vs Mix Tech

Individual Value Plot of Tensile STR vs Mix Tech
Boxplot of Tensile STR
Residuals from Tensile STR vs Mix Tech

One-way ANOVA: Tensile STR versus Mix Tech

* NOTE * Unable to perform Tukey comparisons for this error rate, number of levels, and
degrees of freedom. Cannot provide grouping information or confidence intervals.
* NOTE * Cannot draw the interval plot for the Fisher procedure. Interval plots for
comparisons are illegible with more than 45 intervals.
Method
Null hypothesis
Alternative hypothesis
Significance level

All means are equal

At least one mean is different
= 0.05

Equal variances were assumed for the analysis.

Factor Information
Factor
Mix Tech

Levels
15

Values
2600, 2700, 2765, 2800, 2865, 2890, 2900, 2975, 2985, 3000, 3050, 3129,
3150, 3200, 3300

Analysis of Variance
Source
Mix Tech
Error
Total

DF
14
1
15

Adj SS
630848
12800
643648

Adj MS
45061
12800

F-Value
3.52

P-Value
0.398

Model Summary
S
113.137

R-sq
98.01%

R-sq(adj)
70.17%

R-sq(pred)
*

Means
Mix Tech
2600
2700
2765
2800
2865
2890
2900
2975
2985
3000
3050
3129
3150
3200
3300

N
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1

Mean
2970.0
3150
2765
2865
2800
2600
2975
2900
2985
3200
2600
3129
2700
3000
3300

StDev
113.1
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*

95% CI
(1953.5, 3986.5)
( 1712,
4588)
( 1327,
4203)
( 1427,
4303)
( 1362,
4238)
( 1162,
4038)
( 1537,
4413)
( 1462,
4338)
( 1547,
4423)
( 1762,
4638)
( 1162,
4038)
( 1691,
4567)
( 1262,
4138)
( 1562,
4438)
( 1862,
4738)

Pooled StDev = 113.137

Fisher Pairwise Comparisons

Grouping Information Using the Fisher LSD Method and 95% Confidence
Mix Tech
3300
3000
2700
3129
3200
2985
2900
2600
2975
2800

N
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1

Mean
3300
3200
3150
3129
3000
2985
2975
2970.0
2900
2865

Grouping
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A

2865
2765
3150
3050
2890

1
1
1
1
1

2800
2765
2700
2600
2600

A
A
A
A
A

Means that do not share a letter are significantly different.

Interval Plot of Tensile STR vs Mix Tech

95% CI for the Mean
5000

Tensile STR

4000

3000

2000

1000
2600 2700 2765 2800 2865 2890 2900 2975 2985 3000 3050 3129 3150 3200 3300

Mix Tech
The pooled standard deviation was used to calculate the intervals.

Individual Value Plot of Tensile STR vs Mix Tech

3300
3200

Tensile STR

3100
3000
2900
2800
2700
2600
2600 2700 2765 2800 2865 2890 2900 2975 2985 3000 3050 3129 3150 3200 3300

Mix Tech

Boxplot of Tensile STR

3300
3200

Tensile STR

3100
3000
2900
2800
2700
2600
2600 2700 2765 2800 2865 2890 2900 2975 2985 3000 3050 3129 3150 3200 3300

Mix Tech

2-2 : One-way ANOVA: Density versus Temp

Method
Null hypothesis
Alternative hypothesis
Significance level

All means are equal

At least one mean is different
= 0.05

Equal variances were assumed for the analysis.

Factor Information
Factor

Levels

Values

Temp

100, 125, 150, 175

Analysis of Variance
Source
Temp
Error
Total

DF
3
14
17

Adj SS
0.2161
0.3000
0.5161

Adj MS
0.07204
0.02143

F-Value
3.36

P-Value
0.049

Model Summary
S
0.146385

R-sq
41.87%

R-sq(adj)
29.42%

R-sq(pred)
3.34%

Means
Temp
100
125
150
175

N
5
4
5
4

Mean
21.8400
21.6500
21.6200
21.5500

StDev
0.0894
0.1732
0.1789
0.1291

95%
(21.6996,
(21.4930,
(21.4796,
(21.3930,

CI
21.9804)
21.8070)
21.7604)
21.7070)

Pooled StDev = 0.146385

Tukey Pairwise Comparisons

Grouping Information Using the Tukey Method and 95% Confidence
Temp
100
125
150
175

N
5
4
5
4

Mean
21.8400
21.6500
21.6200
21.5500

Grouping
A
A B
A B
B

Means that do not share a letter are significantly different.

Tukey Simultaneous 95% CIs

Fisher Pairwise Comparisons
Grouping Information Using the Fisher LSD Method and 95% Confidence
Temp
100
125
150
175

N
5
4
5
4

Mean
21.8400
21.6500
21.6200
21.5500

Grouping
A
A B
B
B

Means that do not share a letter are significantly different.

Fisher Individual 95% CIs

Interval Plot of Density vs Temp
Residuals from Density vs Temp

2.3

3 : General Linear Model: Effective versus Solution, Day

Method
Factor coding

(-1, 0, +1)

Factor Information
Factor
Solution
Day

Type
Fixed
Fixed

Levels
3
4

Values
1, 2, 3
1, 2, 3, 4

Analysis of Variance
Source
Solution
Day
Error
Total

DF
2
3
6
11

Adj SS
674.2
463.6
695.2
1862.3

Adj MS
337.1
154.5
115.9

F-Value
2.91
1.33

P-Value
0.131
0.348

Model Summary
S
10.7639

R-sq
62.67%

R-sq(adj)
31.56%

R-sq(pred)
*

Coefficients
Term
Constant
Solution
1
2
Day
1
2
3

Coef
18.75

SE Coef
3.11

T-Value
6.03

P-Value
0.001

VIF

21.17
2.17

9.83
6.21

2.15
0.35

0.075
0.739

6.67
2.67

-22.2
-0.92
9.58

11.2
6.95
6.95

-1.99
-0.13
1.38

0.094
0.899
0.217

6.50
2.50
2.50

Regression Equation
Effective = 18.75 + 21.17 Solution_1 + 2.17 Solution_2 - 23.33 Solution_3 - 22.2 Day_1
- 0.92 Day_2 + 9.58 Day_3 + 13.6 Day_4
Fits and Diagnostics for Unusual Observations
Obs
4
9
X

Effective
39.00
5.00

Fit
39.00
5.00

Resid
-0.00
0.00

Std
Resid
*
*

X
X

Unusual X

Normplot of Residuals for Effective

Residuals vs Fits for Effective
Residuals vs Order for Effective
2.3 : General Linear Model: Effective versus Solution, Day
Method
Factor coding

(-1, 0, +1)

Factor Information
Factor
Solution
Day

Type
Fixed
Fixed

Levels
3
4

Values
1, 2, 3
1, 2, 3, 4

Analysis of Variance
Source
Solution
Day
Error
Total

DF
2
3
6
11

Adj SS
674.2
463.6
695.2
1862.3

Adj MS
337.1
154.5
115.9

F-Value
2.91
1.33

P-Value
0.131
0.348

Model Summary
S
10.7639

R-sq
62.67%

R-sq(adj)
31.56%

R-sq(pred)
*

Coefficients
Term
Constant
Solution
1
2
Day
1
2
3

Coef
18.75

SE Coef
3.11

T-Value
6.03

P-Value
0.001

VIF

21.17
2.17

9.83
6.21

2.15
0.35

0.075
0.739

6.67
2.67

-22.2
-0.92
9.58

11.2
6.95
6.95

-1.99
-0.13
1.38

0.094
0.899
0.217

6.50
2.50
2.50

Regression Equation
Effective = 18.75 + 21.17 Solution_1 + 2.17 Solution_2 - 23.33 Solution_3 - 22.2 Day_1
- 0.92 Day_2 + 9.58 Day_3 + 13.6 Day_4
Fits and Diagnostics for Unusual Observations
Obs
4
9
X

Effective
39.00
5.00

Unusual X

Fit
39.00
5.00

Resid
-0.00
0.00

Std
Resid
*
*

X
X

4 : General Linear Model: Effective versus Bath, Day

Method
Factor coding

(-1, 0, +1)

Factor Information

Factor
Bath
Day

Type
Fixed
Fixed

Levels
5
5

Values
1, 2, 3, 4, 5
1, 2, 3, 4, 5

Analysis of Variance
Source
Bath
Day
Error
Total

DF
4
4
16
24

Adj SS
45.360
9.360
145.840
200.560

Adj MS
11.340
2.340
9.115

F-Value
1.24
0.26

P-Value
0.332
0.901

Model Summary
S
3.01911

R-sq
27.28%

R-sq(adj)
0.00%

R-sq(pred)
0.00%

Coefficients
Term
Constant
Bath
1
2
3
4
Day
1
2
3
4

Coef
6.240

SE Coef
0.604

T-Value
10.33

P-Value
0.000

VIF

-1.84
0.96
0.36
1.76

1.21
1.21
1.21
1.21

-1.52
0.79
0.30
1.46

0.147
0.438
0.769
0.164

1.60
1.60
1.60
1.60

0.36
-0.64
-0.84
0.56

1.21
1.21
1.21
1.21

0.30
-0.53
-0.70
0.46

0.769
0.603
0.497
0.649

1.60
1.60
1.60
1.60

Regression Equation
Effective = 6.240 - 1.84 Bath_1 + 0.96 Bath_2 + 0.36 Bath_3 + 1.76 Bath_4 - 1.24 Bath_5
+ 0.36 Day_1 - 0.64 Day_2 - 0.84 Day_3 + 0.56 Day_4 + 0.56 Day_5