Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
!1
connective tissue with healthy cells. By contrast, periodontitis, which involves breakdown of the
epithelial attachment is not reversible.
[Slide 7] [Pocket healing (repair) and]
[Dr. ???] And what we can hope for is basicallyas it says here cessation of attachment loss.
Stopping the progression of the disease. So the whole thing of attachment loss in areas where
pockets were in evidence typically by means of a long junctional epithelial. Now that may be a
new term for you. Thats something youre familiar with, or not? Yes? Ok..So were not going
to spend whole lot of time about that. But for 2 fundamental reasons, we get reduction in probing
depth. One due to the long junctional epithelium formation and for the second due to shrinkage or
reduction in the size of inflamed and edematous tissue.
!2
tissue anatomical structure. Its made up of epithelial elements. And so this is what we can hope
for, in terms of significant positive outcome form non- surgical therapy. And here you can see a
few of these, fibers, the PDL fibers that were damaged have regenerated, and with it, some little
amount of bone regenerates. But again, this is a very, very, very small proportion of what amounts
to the epithelial apparatus. Now the smoother, the more biocompatible that root surface is, the
more likely it will form a long junctional epithelium. So theres a physiological basis or rationale
to what we call root plane. Root planing is simply creating a biocompatible surface upon which
epithelial cells will migrate, or through which they will migrate. And then form the long
junctional epithelium. Now does anyone have any questions about this? Ok. I hope its straight
forward.
[Slide 12] [Root planing]
[Dr. ???] This is a histological picture of the same. These are the deposits of calculus, plaque,
this is - here, calculus covered with plaque. Yuck. This is the suclcular epithelium. This is the
instrument in place, and it goes from the base of the pocket coronally. OK? And here is root
planing. The Gracie curette removes plaque, calculus, endotoxin-containing cementum from the
root surface. The arrow indicates the direction toward which the curette is pulled. So we place it
in the pocket to the depth of the sulcus and then move it coronally. And youve all had some little
experience in this in Introduction to Patient Care. Although, hopefully, none of you have
periodontal pockets.
[Slide 13] [What are the limitations )potential) of initial therapy?]
[Dr. ???] So what are the limitations, actually potential of initial therapy. In other words, what
are the limitations of non-surgical therapy?
[Slide 14] [Scaling and Root planing]
[Dr. ???] So this is a University of Michigan study that was done 35 years ago. And what was
compared was scaling and root planing, whats called a Widmans flap- modified Widmans flap,
and a surgical approach to pocket elimination
[Slide 15] [Scaling/Root planing images]
[Dr. ???] And the next slide shows these 3 techniques. Scaling and Root Planing which I dont
feel I need to explain. A modified Widman surgical approach. The blade goes from the sulcular
epithelium at the free gingival margin to the crest of the bone and this tissue is simply excised.
This oral epithelium and connective tissue remains in place. The 3rd technique is a flap
procedure. The blade is brought to the crest and then what is called a periosteal elevator is used to
push this tissue up and out. So you can imagine, this becomes the flap thats moved into the oral
cavity, so to speak, away from the bone. And you can see its been reduced in size. This is a
pocket elimination technique that basically reduces the height from the free gingival margin. And
at the same time what we can do is move this flap apically. Its called an apically positioned or
apically repositioned flap thereby eliminating a periodontal pocket. In this case, we cut open the
sulcular epithelium, root plane, and replace this flap. And in the closed procedure, initial therapy,
we simply root plane. So every one understand the difference between these 3 techniques? Ok.
[Slide 16] [Pocket depths: 4-6mm]
[Dr. ???] So what happens after 8 years? After 8 years, the pocket reduction among these three
techniques is indistinguishable which suggests that non-surgical therapy is just as effective, or it
can be just as effective as a surgical approach to pocket elimination. And you can see this is 4-6
millimeter pockets. What happens if a pocket is 7 or 8 or 10 millimeters? We know from studies
like this that a pocket greater than, deeper than 6 mm will not resolve. You really cant induce
!3
enough shrinkage and enough of a long junctional epithelium so that the probing depth is
significantly reduced within a 7mm pocket or 8 or 9 or 10. So, just about 5-6mm is the limit of
the effectiveness of non-surgical therapy. So if a patient presents to you with probing depths - and
anything that Im saying, is it, do you all understand when I say probing depths? Do you all
understand when I say probing depths, what I mean? Does anyone not understand? So a patient
comes in with generalized periodontitis probing depths ranging from 6 to 10 to 12 in the molar
region, you can rest assured that this patient will probably need surgery at some point. And whats
the point? It would be after reevaluation, after youve made the assessment of how effective
initial therapy has been. So residual sites, sites of residual disease, would then be referred to the
periodontist or the generalist who is interested in periodontal surgery for a surgical procedure.
[Slide 17] [Additional goals of periodontal therapy]
[Dr. ???] Next year, youll get a whole year of advanced periodontics. So I dont want to go
that much into this. There are additional goals of periodontalof initial therapy. Improved
contour to simplify plaque control. Well, this is periodontal therapy in general. Stabilize mobile
teeth, improve soft-tissue aesthetics and restore lost tissues. So this is periodontal therapy in
general, including initial therapy and surgical therapy. But you know, dont worry about this slide
today.
[Slide 18] [Periodontal Therapy II]
[Dr. ???] Umm, now were going to talk about in more specific terms, what to do with patients.
[Slide 19] [Initial Therapy]
[Dr. ???] This is initial therapy, Phase I therapy, Non Surgical Therapy, Cause-Related
Therapy, Anti-infective therapy, all the same. You want to stop the infection.
[Slide 20] [The goal of conservative, non-surgical therapy is to:]
[Dr. ???] And these are the goals of non surgical therapy. Eliminate the bacteria responsible for
periodontal destruction. You want to change the microflora from a pathogenic population to a
non-pathogenic population. You would like to create a bio-compatible root surface- that, you now
understand why. You need to remove diseased or infected tissues. And again, importantly, you
want to ascertain, understand, examine the response of the host both physiologically and
behaviorally.
[Slide 21] [Initial Therapy I: Hygiene Phase]
[Dr. ???] So heres initial therapy phase 1- Hygiene phase. What were doing here is instructing
the patient in oral hygiene techniques. We may introduce chemical plaque control. Whats that?
What do you think that is? Antimicrobial rinse. There are some patients who really cant manage,
because of arthritis, because of other impediments who cant manage, on a day to day basis,
plaque control, effectively. So, for some of those patients, we may recommend an antimicrobial.
We want to take away supra gingival plaque and calculus. We want to remove iatrogenic irritants.
Whats an example of an iatrogenic irritant? Fancy word for an overhanging margin, an open
contact, um, something that a dentist has done to create a problem for the patient. So you want to
try to identify and eliminate iatrogenic - meaning coming form the provider- mistakes, so to
speak. And finally removal of naturally occurring plaque retentive areas. What would be an
example of that. Anybody go to the orthodontist here? Ever? Did you start out, anybody- who
went to the orthodontist? So did you start out with really crowded teeth? Were they easy to
maintain plaque control? In some cases, its impossible to maintain plaque control with really
crowded teeth. Its a recommendation to go to the orthodontist simply to be able to keep you
!4
periodontal tissue healthy. There are many other reasons to go to he orthodontist. This is one of
them. Okay. Initial therapy II, scaling and root planing is more invasive. Its sub gingival and
were basically preparing the root surface for the long junctional epithelium. This typically
doesnt involve anesthesia. Phase II on the other hand, typically does. We anesthetize our patients
with local anesthesia to scale and root plane effectively.
[Slide 22] [Sequence of Treatment]
[Dr. ???] Now heres the sequence of treatment. We first collect clinical and radiographic
evidence, interpret the evidence. We make a diagnosis, we identify the risk factors. We make a
prognosis, formulate a treatment plan and treat the patient.
[Slide 23] [Sequence of Treatment]
[Dr. ???] So the first step is the first 3.
[Slide 24] [Health History]
[Dr. ???] So lets look. Heres a patient, 52 year old male with history of heart murmur, which
at this point may not be significant. Is a smoker and his family history doesn't include diabetes.
Why do I want to know about diabetes? Is it a risk factor for periodontal disease? Absolutely. So
this person - we want to at least identify one risk factor for periodontal disease. Hes smoking.
His approach to dental treatment has been what we call crisis care. What does that mean? When
theres a crisis, he goes. So is this a person that you think might be thinking ahead abut his
periodontal health? Probably not, so this may present a challenge when changing this patients
behavior. He brushes his teeth twice a day - most people do. He says hes under a lot of stress and
hes clenching and grinding his teeth and they keep him up at night. You know what that term is?
Its a parafunctional habit calledanyone? Its a b-word. Bruxism. Ok. And his teeth are really
sensitive to cold. Its consistent with clenching sometimes. Ok.
[Slide 25] [Oral Examination]
[Dr. ???] So his everything extra orally are within normal limits. And everything, in terms of
the soft tissue and outside of the teeth and periodontal tissues are also within normal limits.
[Slide 26] [Images]
[Dr. ???] So we look at the clinical picture and I circled this. What is this called? This is
blunting of the papilla. Something is going on there. And when I talked yesterday about how to
form or maintain the viability of the interdental papillae during restorative procedures. So it may
be this is a function of the fact that this crown was poorly contoured and didnt maintain the
papillae between tooth 13 and 14. It can also be that there is a defect here underlying in the bone
so that the interproximal bone has been lost and so the underlying support for the soft tissue is
also compromised. But its a sign that there is something going on. May not be that significant but
it may be significant. You can see everything else sort of looks normal. Theres inflammation and
some edema but nothing to get excited about. Now, this is a patient whose soft tissue may not
look as inflamed as you would expect for a patient whose plaque control is poor. Anyone think of
why that may be the case? Smoking. Somebody said smoking? Yeah. Thats true. So smokers
actually look a little healthier, if you dont look at them that carefully then they actually might be.
And the reason is, for one thing, constricts the peripheral blood vessels. So if thats going on in
the oral cavity, youre not going to see that much edema, youre not going to see that much
erythema, and you certainly wont see that much bleeding. Theres also a much more
foundational effect of smoking, and I talked about that as well, on the immune system. So the
inflammatory process itself is compromised. And smokers dont look inflamed, because their
!5
immune system cant do it. Okay? So its important to recognize the fact that, for example,
bleeding on probing in a smoker cant be used as an indication or not of inflammation. Its
different for people who dont smoke.
[Slide 27] [Clinical Examination I]
[Dr. ???] So here, the clinical exam. All the teeth are there. There are some restorations that are
poor. Theres a lot plaque, calculus, and some mobility and fremitus. Can anyone define fremitus?
You know what fremitus is? Can anyone? No? So when you close your teeth together, and clench
them and move your jaw back and forth, if you take the finger and you put it on the outside
surface of your maxillary teeth. If the teeth are in fremitus, youll feel them moving in response to
the functional activity of your lower jaw. By definition, mobility induced by function. Patients
with severe or pronounced fremitus, you can actually see teeth move. But the more subtle
fremitus, you feel with a finger. You just put it on the outside of the buccal surface of your
maxillary teeth, clench back and forth. And if theres mobility and fremitus youll feel it.
[Slide 28] [What comes first, radiographs or periodontal probing..?]
[Dr. ???] Ok. So what comes first? We have a blank sheet in front of us for charting and we
have a set of X-rays. What do we do first? Do we look at the films first? Or do we start charting
the clinical defects? Anybody offer a suggestion? And why? Who thinks we look at films first?
Anybody? Ok. So the rest of you dont vote or you think we do the charting first. Well, to me, and
this is a personal belief, to me, I would look at the films first.
[Slide 29] [Radiographs]
[Dr. ???] And why do I do that? Because the films are going to give me a road map. Theyre
going to tell me where to expect to see a soft tissue defect that would be consistent, for example,
with bone loss at a particular site. On the other hand, you can see Ive circled, youve got. This is
his film. This is the crown thats next to the blunted papilla.
[Slide 30] [Radiographs]
[Dr. ???] And you can see theres something right here. And Im going to make them bigger.
Theres something right here. These are two views. So what is that? That could be cement. It
could be calculus. Its something radiopaque. And if you were to probe between 14 and 15, you
might end up with a probing depth of 1 or 2 millimeters, because your probe got stuck on
whatever that radiopaque structure is. So what you would miss is the fact that theres probably a 5
or 6 or even 7 millimeter pocket between 14 and 15, not that you can tell theres a pocket from
the films, but this tell you to go looking between 14 and 15 for what you think may be a
periodontal defect. Ok? So again, by the same token, if this werent here, this little piece of
calculus or whatever, you had the films in front of you and you saw that bone loss between 14
and 15, you would absolutely make sure that when you probe you didnt miss something that you
think might be there. So thats the reason I think we should look at the film, actually, before we
start clinical charting. To give us a sense of what to expect, if nothing more.
[Slide 31] [Radiographs]
[Dr. ???] And here it is even bigger. Now what you see here- what does this slanted bone
represent? This is what is called a vertical defect. As opposed to a horizontal defect. So there s a
horizontal bone loss which occurs over a long period of time and is associated with chronic
disease. And then theres whats called vertical bone loss where you get these very sharp angle
from the horizontal plane of the alveolar ridge.
[Slide 32] [Radiographs]
!6
[Dr. ???] Now, this would be consistent with, for example, a deep periodontal pocket. Okay.
Any questions about this? And then theres a failed root canal, maybe. Maybe a perforation of an
anterior tooth. And this might be associated with a periodontal defect. Very often we see,
associated with failed RCT, especially if its a perforation of the root. And it seems to be a
perforation that might have been associated with this post - whats called and endo-perio or perioendo lesion. So that the one lesion becomes contiguous with the other. So knowing that theres
this defect in the tooth, again, you would make sure that between- this was 7? 9 and 10 and 10
and 11- that you would make sure that you've examined that really carefully and not missed what
might be a periodontal endodontic lesion.
[Slide 33] [Radiographic Analysis]
[Dr. ???] So here is the radiographic analysis. Uniform loss of alveolar crestal height, limited
mainly to posterior segments. Possible vertical defect on 15. Radiopacity, possible dental cement
on the distal aspect of #14. A failed root canal and a defective filling. So thats kind of your
radiographic analysis. And that goes in the progress notes. You need to write up what your
findings are. Ok. Is there furcation involvement? Its a very important issue. Does anyone know
what a furcation involvement means when I say furcation involvement? What does that mean?
Anyone? First, where would you find a furcation involvement. In front teeth or back?
[Class] Back
[Dr. ???] Ok. So you know what a furcation is.
[Slide 34] [Radiographs]
[Dr. ???] So furcation involvement is when periodontal infection reaches the level of furcation,
and you can begin to see it radiographically. And its not always that clear clinically. But
radiographically, for example, this radiolucency on these molars. The radiolucency here, the
radiolucency on this maxillary molar on the mesial aspect of the maxillary molar, the buccal
aspect of the maxillary molar and the distal aspect. And theres actually a very, sort of,
pathognomonic finding where, whats called the dark triangle. You see that here. Anyone not see
the dark triangle? Theres one here, and theres one here. And its formed by the fact that the
palatal root overlaps with the buccal or distobuccal or mesiobuccal root on the maxillary molar.
So for some of this, you have the 2 roots together, and for some of it, only one root is visible. And
so it looks like a radiolucent triangle. Knowing that this exists radiographically, you would go out
of your way with a Nabers probe to make sure that you found or you couldn't find a clinical
furcation. Itsand why do we need to know about clinical furcations? What does that have a
bearing on when were doing our diagnosis and work-up. We find teeth with furcation
involvements, what does that significant- why is that significant? What does it affect. It doesnt
affect the diagnosis but it does affect the prognosis. Because we know the prognosis is poor for
teeth that have furcation involvement, if only because its more difficult to manage, to stabilize a
periodontal infection in a furcation involved tooth. So all of these things were collecting. All of
the data were collecting which is clinical findings - you write a big list down, and on the basis of
that, and the other list of risk factors, we can make a prognosis. We can predict this patients
future. Not only for the patient, but for us- so that when youre treating a patient, you need to
know, as best as you can determine, what the outcome, possible outcomes are. So you can inform
the patient. And the more accurate, as I said a few days ago, the more accurate your prediction,
the smarter youll seem to your patients and youll get more and more interested in knowing
about their future. And when you think about it, thats who you want to see.
[Slide 35] [Clinical Examination II]
[Dr. ???] So the Clinical Examination II is, after we did the head and neck and intraoral, then
we do clinical examination 2, which is probing, bleeding on probing, assessment of calculus,
mobility. All of the clinical findings that we associated with teeth and the periodontal tissue.
!7
!8
young. Then, and there are abundant local factors- plaque, calculus, no compliance, there's
smoking, all types of things that contribute to this guys disease. So this is in striking distinction to
aggressive disease which Ill talk about probably in about half hour.
[Slide 41] [So whats the definitive periodontal diagnosis?]
[Dr. ???] Ok. So whats the definitive periodontal diagnosis? Ok. Chronic periodontitis. And
we then need to say how severe is it? Its not simply chronic periodontitis. Is it mild, moderate, or
severe? And you can use this. These definitions. Somebody might call it a little bit more or less
severe, with one or two more millimeters one way or the other. But basically its either mild,
which is either incipient, or manageable, predictably, by non-surgical therapy. Moderate
periodontitis, by definition, more serious, more involved, the pocketing can be greater than 6.
And typically, this is not managed only by non-surgical therapy. And severe, again, by definition,
over 7mm of pocket depth or probing depth or attachment loss. And this is, without question, not
completely manageable with non-surgical therapy. So you can think of it, what can I treat
completely with scaling and root planing? That will be mild. What may need surgery? Probably,
need surgery- thats probably moderate. And what will definitely need surgery or is completely
hopeless, cant be treated? Thats without question, sever. So theres sort of a commonsensical
approach to this which makes much more sense than trying to remember definitions of how many
millimeters is associated with one versus the other. You can put it in a context of something thats
relatable - that makes much more sense, I think.
[Slide 42] [Probing depths]
[Dr. ???] So heres the chart again. Im not sure why I have it here. Oh, so I just wanted to
reiterate. This is pocketing of 4 and 5. Heres a 6 here and there. 5s and 6s. 3s and 4s. So
theres a range here. The deepest pocket is 6 so[Slide 43] [Diagnosis: Chronic generalized mid-moderate periodontitis]
[Dr. ???] SKIP
[Slide 44] [Sequence of Treatment]
[Dr. ???] It may be chronic generalized mild-moderate periodontitis. So youve got a mix, or
its sort of in the middle between whats frankly manageable, non surgically, which may be some
areas that may have to be treated surgically. So theres- its in between mild and moderate. So the
diagnosis is chronic mild to moderate. We also want to identify where it is. The extent of this- is it
localized or generalized? And there are lots of definitions that distinguish between localized and
generalized. But if it occurs in more than a few or several sites and more than a couple of
quadrants I would call it generalized. So again, you can look at it from a commonsensical
point of view in terms of its definition. Do not get hung up on how many, or 27 reasons to use a
rubber dam, that kind of memorization. You should really think of it in terms of the context, for
example, treating the patient.
[Slide 45] [Summary of Risk Factors]
[Dr. ???] Ok. So, next- weve made the diagnosis. Now we have to figure out the risk factors
and make a prognosis. S the risk factors are plaque, the pockets themselves are risk factors for
more plaque. Lack of compliance. Those are local factors. The systemic factors are smoking, and
previous so the patient walks in and he has attachment loss. So by definition, thats called a
previous loss of attachment. Why is that significant. Well, its significant because it speaks to, sort
of, an inherent susceptibility to periodontitis in this patient. Then you have to ask which of these
!9
are modifiable. So of all of these, which are modifiable? The only one thats not modifiable is
previous loss of attachment. You cant do anything about that, its like his age. Its a given. So the
other smoking and plaque control, you definitely can address. Definitely can address.
[Slide 46] [Determine the Prognosis]
[Dr. ???] So that goes into the prognosis. Theres a short term prognosis. Good, and what does
that mean? And youll more about this next year from Dr. Brawler, Dr. Kye.
[Slide 47] [Short-term prognosis]
[Dr. ???] But in short term prognosis, its basically whether or not your therapy on a short term
-you know the first 3 months of knowing a patient- whether that is going to be effective. It
probably will. The long term prognosis depends on whether or not we can eliminate or reduce the
threats. And that speaks to behavior, smoking as well as plaque control.
!10
!11
~Applause~
A smattering of applause, I love it.
!12