H J AMES J OHNSON

HUMAN RIGHTS § CIVIL RIGHTS § CORRUPTION § MEDIA

D EFA M AT I O N § P R O F E S S I O N A L N E G L I G E N C E L AW
1 S T F L O O R 1 4 1 O S B O R N E S T R E E T S O U T H YA R R A V I C T O R I A 3 1 4 1
TELEPHONE: +613 9279 3932 FA C S I M I L E : + 6 1 3 9 2 7 9 3 9 5 5

Monday 21 September 2009 *** IMPORTANT COMMUNICATION

*** NO MEDIA EMBARGO WHATSOEVER

Mr Robert McClelland
Attorney-General
Australian Parliament House
Canberra ACT 2600

By Facsimile: 02 6237 4102 (... pages)

Dear Mr McClelland

UNITED NATIONS TOLD 'FAMILY COURTS ABUSING ONE MILLION AUSTRALIAN'S HUMAN RIGHTS'
AUSSIES IN WONDERLAND: WITCH HUNT, WATERGATE, WATERLOO - VICTORIAN SUPREME COURT
PROCEEDINGS 9665 OF 2007, 9263 AND 10222 OF 2008 AND 3731 AND 3766 OF 2009
AGGRAVATED BURGLARY 17 NOVEMBER 2007 (VICTIM: JOHNSON – CULPRIT: CRESSY)

1. I attach a copy of my latest facsmile today to my local Federal Member of Parliament, Ms Julia Gillard,
Deputy PM, plus substantial reading materials from the Victorian Ombudsman's 2008-09 Annual Report,
and press reports of the Federal Attorney-General's warnings 'lawyers fail you' and 'sharks with wigs'.
2. Ms Gillard's staff assure me that they have copied to you my complaint materials, including my 300 plus
page Notice under Section 32 of the Victorian Charter of Human Rights and Responsiblities Act 2006.
3. I am reeling from reading these materials on Friday, as they provide a helicopter view of the corruption and
criminal misconduct that is rampant in the legal profession (solicitors, barristers, judges and regulators) of
which I am probably just one, probably one of the biggest and most heavily hit, victims.
4. The Victorian Attorney-General should be sacked for appointing this States most criminally incompetent
lawyer as its peak lawyer-regulator. I'm all by crying as I write this – pain, shock and humor.
5. I swear that my case is a perfect example for anyone with the moral courage to wish to do a rocket-fuelled
clean up of this corrupt industry.
6. But just look at the WA Chief Justice Martin's suggestions – the emphasis should be on teaching ethics not
punishing the sharks for past sharking (or, presumably, compensating the bitten and maimed). Is this
corruption, or is this politicial expediency – recognition that the lawyered priveleged class are so powerful,
and will use all their privileges and powers to keep their privlieges and powers, and the extent of sharking is
too endemic (a $6bn per annum industry in the family law courts alone) to ever get any reforms without the
co-operation of powerful lawyers lobbies, which co-operation can only be bought with blanket permanent
amnesties for all sharks in wigs.
7. This is truly sickening for someone like me who believes in stuff like Magna Charta, equality of all under the
law, and that professionals should lead by example (if anything, should be less equal rather than more equal
under the law).
8. I ask that you action this information and my plight as best fits your moral courage and conscience. Me, I
have no doubt that the Governments (State and Federal) will lay down with the powerful 'sharks with wigs'
lobbies and this will all die down with no real changes. Just words that can be said so the problems can be
forgotten soon – especially with the footy finals, Spring races and other much more important grown up
children's games and things coming up to occupy the minds of the masses.
9. Mr Federal Attorney-General, are you just a big bag of words that do not translate into actions? or unlike
your Victorian counterpart, do you have the moral courage to translate your words of last week into lasting
actions. One day, I hope, operative human rights laws will be introduced into Australia, as the Australian
Government has since 1991 been legally obliged to do under international law (as signatory 18 years ago to
the Optional Protocol to the United Nations 1964 [sic] International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights).
During my life-time I've seen indiginous born Australian's finally recognised as human beings (1967 federal
constitutional amendments). At some stage in my life-time (ie pre-2050) I'd like to see human rights laws
introduced in Australia, for all Australians – do you and your Government have any capacity to begin
delivering on them?

Kind regards

H. JAMES JOHNSON