Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
a r t i c l e
i n f o
Article history:
Received 18 September 2007
Received in revised form 26 March 2008
Accepted 27 March 2008
Available online 4 April 2008
Keywords:
Calabrese sausage
Natural hog casing
Stufng yield
Soy lecithin
a b s t r a c t
Large quantities of natural casings are used in sausage production, affecting quality and cost aspects. The
inuence of different casing treatments with surfactant solutions on the stufng yield of Calabrese sausage was studied in this work. The effect of process variables (soy lecithin and soy oil concentrations,
temperature and treatment time) on casing properties was evaluated with the aid of an experimental
design. Elongation, tensile strength, porosity and water vapor permeability of treated casings, as well
as color, sensory attributes and physicalchemical parameters were determined. Higher stufng yields
were obtained using soy lecithin solutions in concentration up to 1:25 w/w for 3060 min. The surfactant
solutions increased the elongation capacity of the treated casings. On the other hand, no signicant difference was observed regarding the water vapor permeability of treated casings compared with control.
Consequently, the yield of natural hog casings can be improved by the proposed treatment, while the
quality characteristics are preserved.
2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
The development of high added-value products with quality
requisites is a challenge for the meat industry. The sausage packaging process and the technological characteristics of hog casings are
important to maintain the functional properties, the quality attributes and the safety of sausage goods. Moreover, sausage casings
should present good barrier to water vapor, low cost, easy manufacturing and caliber regularity, producing uniform size and
shapes. Therefore, because natural casings present variability in
caliber and elongation capacity, studies to improve casings properties are essential to enlarge the stufng efciency, raising the
sausage production (Bakker et al., 1999; Benli et al., 2008).
Functional and mechanical properties of edible lms like sausage casings can be modied by the action of surfactant substances. The soy lecithin is a surfactant particularly attractive to
food industries due to its functional and nutritional properties,
and attractive cost/benet ratio (Rodrguez et al., 2006; Wong,
1995). The humectant and the surfactant properties of soy lecithin
are related to the phospholipids content, implying characteristics
such as viscosity reducer of fat emulsions, dispersion agent, antioxidant and dissolution accelerator (McClements, 2005).
Natural casings used in sausage stufng are frequently salted to
reduce microorganism activity, with no changes in their technological properties. Chemical preservatives such as lactic, tartaric and
citric acid, hydrogen peroxide or ethanol are also applied (Chawla
et al., 2006; Byun et al., 2001). These chemicals can generate adverse
effects on casings technological characteristics, including an in* Corresponding author. Tel.: +55 48 3721 9448; fax: +55 48 3721 9687.
E-mail address: sandra@enq.ufsc.br (S.R.S. Ferreira).
0260-8774/$ - see front matter 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2008.03.024
18
an industrial unit following the company formulation (condential) and in accordance with the Brazilian regulations (MAPA,
2000). For the natural hog casing treatments, surfactant:water
solutions were prepared with soy lecithin and commercial soybean
oil. The treated casings were used for sausage stufng in a continuous vertical mechanical unit.
2.2. Experimental design
A fractional factorial design of 341 was used with the aim of
determining the combined effect of process variables on casing
properties. The variables were: (1) lecithin concentration, (2) oil
concentration, (3) solution temperature and (4) residence time of
casing in the surfactant solution. The values of the variables were
dened according to operational limitations and dened in three
levels (1, 0, +1). The experimental plan was obtained using the
software Statistica 6.0 Statsoft, OK USA, and resulted in 27 assays, as presented in Table 1.
The effect of the variables on the casing properties was evaluated through stufng efciency and Calabrese sausage quality.
The stufng efciency, treated as casing yield before cooking
(YBC) and casing yield after cooking (YAC), was determined by the
weight increase of treated sausages related to the control weight
(casing without treatment), as follows:
weightBC controlBC 100
;
controlBC
weightAC controlAC 100
%
controlAC
Y BC %
Y AC
where weightBC and weightAC are the mean weight for 30 sausage
pieces for each casing treatment, measured before and after cooking, respectively, and controlBC and controlAC are the average
weights obtained from industry data considering 6 months of production, before and after cooking, respectively.
Table 1
Experimental plan: process variables for the treatment of natural hog casings
Treatment
Soy lecithin
concentrationa
Soy oil
concentration (%
w/w)
Solution
temperature
(C)
Residence
time (min)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
1:30
1:30
1:30
1:30
1:30
1:30
1:30
1:30
1:30
1:25
1:25
1:25
1:25
1:25
1:25
1:25
1:25
1:25
1:20
1:20
1:20
1:20
1:20
1:20
1:20
1:20
1:20
0.0
0.0
0.0
2.5
2.5
2.5
5.0
5.0
5.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
2.5
2.5
2.5
5.0
5.0
5.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
2.5
2.5
2.5
5.0
5.0
5.0
20
30
40
20
30
40
20
30
40
20
30
40
20
30
40
20
30
40
20
30
40
20
30
40
20
30
40
30
90
60
90
60
30
60
30
90
90
60
30
60
30
90
30
90
60
60
30
90
30
90
60
90
60
30
G
d
t AP s RH1 RH2
19
20
Table 2
Experimental results obtained for YBC and YAC, for assays performed with free casing
release (FC) and restricted casing release (RC)
Treatment
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Mean
a
b
FC
RC
YBC (%)a
YAC (%)b
YBC (%)a
YAC (%)b
16.18
4.53
25.43
16.86
28.42
31.50
16.84
12.47
9.13
13.91
9.05
9.81
16.00
4.36
2.28
13.85
24.09
19.04
1.60
7.62
2.62
2.32
20.26
10.39
3.94
9.27
33.20
19.72
3.55
30.75
21.02
28.58
35.89
19.64
14.34
12.23
17.21
10.85
13.61
19.69
6.31
3.91
15.46
27.69
23.22
3.15
5.62
4.19
2.56
22.59
12.49
4.76
11.89
38.35
16.99
26.67
25.53
24.03
42.50
33.08
12.47
14.02
10.71
32.30
24.25
27.12
33.85
18.90
22.12
40.98
34.74
39.57
17.37
14.71
22.72
15.09
35.92
12.20
17.45
25.27
45.72
22.92
24.65
30.86
27.12
43.25
37.14
32.78
15.73
14.41
37.71
27.31
32.38
37.35
21.51
25.19
44.01
40.50
46.47
18.86
12.94
26.39
17.10
40.77
13.96
21.47
25.70
51.96
14 8
16 10
25 9
29 10
sented in terms of linear (L) and quadratic (Q) effect. The results
indicate the surfactant concentration and the oil concentration as
the most signicant variables because the magnitude of the variables are near the signicance line (p = 0.10). Therefore, these variables present a direct relation with stufng yield. The highest
values for YBC and YAC were obtained with the use of surfactant
solution, indicating that the treatments affect the casings physical
characteristics, improving their performance for all concentrations
studied. Indeed, according to Rodrguez et al. (2006), the use of surfactants could be incorporated into the lm formulation to reduce
surface tension, which is a function of the surfactant concentration.
The stufng procedures (FC and RC) are also compared in Table
2. The yield data show higher casing efciency for RC stufng, i.e.
larger amount of sausage batter stuffed inside a linear length of
casing when compared with FC stufng. This behavior is observed
through the YBC and YAC results. The mean values of YBC were
14 8% and 25 9% for FC and RC procedures, respectively, and
the values of YAC were 16 10% and 29 10% for FC and RC procedures, respectively. The comparison of the above yield results
shows a yield increase of 11 6% and 12 7% for YBC and YAC,
respectively. These results are explained by the much higher elongation capacity of treated casings.
As observed in Table 2, the RC procedure is more effective for all
treatments than the FC procedure in terms of yield results, indicating that the use of restricted casing release during stufng is a suitable industrial procedure. Furthermore, comparing treated casings
with control (non-treated), the use of RC decreased casings rupture
from 3.5% to 0.8%, as observed in the results for 3 months of industrial sausage production. It represents a considerable reduction on
casings rupture and leads to an impressive material saving due to
the use of surfactant solution for casing treatment.
3.2. Chemical composition of Calabrese sausage
The YBC and YAC results for the RC procedure indicated higher
stufng yield for treatment 27, for casings treated with upper lecithin concentration (1:20) and oil concentration (5.0%), solution
temperature 40 C and residence time of 30 min. On the other
hand, the lowest yield was obtained for treatment 9, with the inferior lecithin level (1:30).
The Paretto chart presented in Fig. 2 shows the effect of the
yield after cooking (YAC) for Calabrese sausage, calculated for treated casings. The level of signicance of process variables are pre-
Fig. 2. Paretto chart for YAC for Calabrese sausage prepared with treated casings. The effect of the process variables is presented by level of signicance. L and Q represent the
linear and quadratic effect, respectively.
0.955
FC
RC
Standard
Water activity
0.950
0.945
0.940
0.935
0.930
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
21
treated samples with control in terms of luminosity (L*). The average values of L* were 45.3 and 46.6 for treated and for control sausages, respectively. According to the Dunnet test, a signicant
difference at the 5% level was detected between treated samples
and control, with slightly brighter values for control. The evaluation of the process variables for the 54 treatments, related to the
L* values, indicate the lecithin concentration as the only variable
that affect the product luminosity, at level of 5%, compared to control result. The results obtained for a* and b* were 20.7 and
23.3, mean values for 54 treatments, while the respective values
for the control samples were 20.2 and 22.2. These results showed
no signicant difference (p > 0.05), comparing treated samples
with control. Complementarily, the sensorial analysis for the color
attribute showed no difference between treated samples and control, indicating that the surfactant solution does not interfere on
product appearance. Considering that the control product is a very
successful brand, the absence of color interference of surfactant
solution allows its use in industrial production in terms of product
appearance.
The color attribute was also evaluated by sensory analysis (preference test). This attribute was estimated with other quality attributes in order to designate the preferred samples. The results,
performed by the global sensorial analysis, selected the sausage
samples prepared with casings submitted to the following surfactant treatments: 1, 11, 13, and 15. These preferred treatments used
low lecithin concentrations (1:25 and 1:30) and low soy oil
concentrations (0% and 2.5%). The grades obtained by the four preferred tests (treatments 1, 11, 13 and 15) were compared and the p
variance values indicate no signicant variation among treatments
(p > 0.05).
3.4. Physical attributes of natural hog casings
The physical attributes of natural hog casings evaluated in this
study were water vapor permeability (WVP), mechanical properties (tensile strength, elasticity modulus and elongation capacity)
and surface aspects by SEM, as described in Sections 2.7, 2.8 and
2.9, respectively.
The WVP of natural hog casings were evaluated comparing treated casings with control. Samples of natural hog casings submitted
to surfactant treatment 13 were selected for WVP evaluation. The
treatment 13 present a suitable casing yield (according to mean value in Table 2) and was selected by sensory analysis as one of the
better treatments for sausage quality attributes. The conditions
of the selected treatment were: 1:25 soy lecithin concentration,
1.25% soy oil, 24 C of solution temperature and 60 min of residence time. The results of WVP for control and treated samples
(assays in triplicate) were 2.4 107 0.3 107 (g m1 Pa1 h)
and 2.0 107 0.2 107 (g m1 Pa1 h), respectively. According
to the Students t-test, no signicant difference at a 5% level was
detected between treated samples and control.
The results of traction tests, performed for ve treated casings
(1, 2, 8, 13 and 24) and control sample, are compared in Fig. 4.
The traction data are expressed in TS (tensile strength, MPa) and
e (elongation at break or elongation capacity, %) (Srinivasa et al.,
2007).
The values for TS and for e are dependent on the chemical and
physical structure of the material. The results from Fig. 4 show a
conservative behavior for TS values. All treated casings presented
a TS value varying from 4.4 to 5.5 MPa, while the TS value for the
control casing was 4.6 MPa. Otherwise, all treated casings had
the elongation capacity increased by an average of 77% (from
e = 28% to e = 4655%). This behavior has been reported in the literature as being a characteristic of protein- and carbohydrate-based
lms plasticized with glycerol or sorbitol (Park et al., 1993; Moore
et al., 2006). Briey, hog casings can be considered as formed
22
70
TS (MPa)
(%)
60
50
40
30
20
Elongation (%)
10
10
0
Control
Treat.1
Treat.2
Fig. 4. Tensile strength (TS) and elongation (e) for control casing compared with
treated casings (treatments 1, 2, 8, 11, 13, 24).
Several studies have used SEM to correlate the physical properties of materials with the morphological structure of the resulting
lms (Larotonda et al., 2005; Salmieri and Lacroix, 2006). Fig. 5a
and b shows the SEM results for samples of hog casings without
treatment (control) and with treatment 24 (1:20 lecithin concentration, 2.5% edible oil, 40 C and 60 min), respectively. It can be
observed that the surfactant solution evidenced clearly the morphologic structure of the casing surface (Fig. 5b) due to the coating
of the lm bers with lecithin and vegetable oil. Treatments with
surfactant solutions also resulted in a lighter casing surface, as discussed previously. The comparison of Fig. 5a and b indicates also
that the surfactant treatment affect the collagen bers causing a
swelling of the casing.
4. Conclusions
basically of 90% collagen and 5% elastin (Houben et al., 2005), evidencing its protein based composition, with a predisposition to the
action of a plasticizer.
According to Benli et al. (2008), the rupture force indicates the
casings capacity to resist the internal force applied during stufng
and can be used as an alternative rheological method to compare
bursting strength. It explains the results obtained in the present
work, where the elevated elongation capacity (e values) of treated
casings produced higher casing yields during stufng (YBC and YAC).
Comparing the elongation capacity of treated samples, we observe slightly higher values of e (%) for treatments 1 and 13, performed at the lowest temperature level (20 C).
Fig. 5. (a) Micrography obtained by SEM for hog casing without surfactant treatment (control) and (b) micrography obtained by SEM for hog casing submitted to
treatment 24.
23
Rodrguez, M., Oss, J., Ziani, K., Mat, J.I., 2006. Combined effect of platicizers and
surfactants on the physical properties of starch based edible lms. Food
Research International 39 (8), 840846.
Silva, M.A.A.P., 1997. Mtodos de avaliaco sensorial de alimentos. UNICAMP,
p. 71.
Salmieri, S., Lacroix, M., 2006. Physicochemical properties of alginate/
polycaprolactone-based lms containing essential oils. Journal of Agricultural
and Food Chemistry 54 (26), 1020510214.
Srinivasa, P.C., Ramesh, M.N., Tharanathan, R.N., 2007. Effect of plasticizers and fatty
acids on mechanical and permeability characteristics of chitosan lms. Food
Hydrocolloids 21 (7), 11131122.
Wong, D.W.S., 1995. Qumica de los Alimentos Mecanismos y Teoria. Acribia,
Zaragoza, pp. 3943.