Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
(a) Compare the Chebyshev bound and the exact probability for the event {|X | c}
as a function of c for X distributed uniform on [b, b].
(b) Compare the Chernoff and Chebyshev bounds to the exact probabilities for X a Laplacian
random variable with parameter a = 2 for c = 1, 2, 3, 4, 5. You may use Python, MATLAB,
or whatever mathematical tool you like, to evaluate the Chernoff bound.
5 j
determine E[X].
SS-1. Let X be a Poisson random variable with parameter .
(a) Let = 100. Fill out the following table (show how you got each value).
True
Chernoff
Generalized
CLT
probability
bound
Chebyshev Inequality
Estimate
P(X 105)
0.3216
0.8843
1.8
0.31
P(X 120)
0.0282
0.1528
1.4
0.023
( 2 + 2 )
1 N
Xi
N i=1
1
[1 + (x )2 ]
i = 1, . . . , N.
1
,
[1 + (y )2 ]
that is, is identical to the pdf of the Xi s and independent of N. (Hint: Use the c.f. approach.)
4.
(a) In a radar system used to detect an airplane, a continuous wave signal is transmitted on
two adjacent frequencies and the return signals are processed to produce two outputs
X and Y . If only ground clutter (i.e., no plane) is present, X and Y are independent
Gaussian random variables with mean zero and variance 1/4. If a plane is present,
the X and Y are jointlypGaussian random variables with mean zero, variance one, and
correlation coefficient 3/4.
If the probability that a plane is present is 2/3, determine the maximum a posteriori
(MAP) criterion for deciding whether a plane is present.
(b) In another radar system, the outputs X and Y are always uncorrelated, zero-mean
Gaussian random variables. However, the variance of the random variables is one if no
plane is present and four if a plane is present. If the probability that a plane is present is
2/3, determine the maximum likelihood (ML) criterion for deciding whether a plane
is present.
4
1.6 1.6
1
0.5
K1 = 1.6
1.6 0.5 0.694
(b)
4
1.6 1.6
1 0.6
K2 = 1.6
1.6 0.6
1
(c)
4
1.6 1.6
1
0.5
K3 = 1.6
1.6 0.5
1
(d)
4
1.6 1.6
1
0.5
K4 = 1.6
1.6 0.5
1
5. Part (a) of problem 5.10 in Stark and Woods
6. Problem 5.15 in Stark and Woods
299
PROBLEMS
5.6. Let Xi, i = 1,..., n be n mutually orthogonal random vectors. Show that
E
= EE[||Xi||2].
x<
i=l
i=l
= ^[||Xi-Mi||2].
(*-- M i )
i=i
i=l
5.8. Let Xi,i = 1,... ,n be n mutually uncorrelated random vectors with i[X;] = /xi}
i = 1,..., n. Show that
= EK.
E
i=l
i=l
where Ki [(Xi - &)&* - Mi)T]5.9. Explain why none of the following matrices can be covariance matrices associated
with real random vectors.
2 - 4 0'
4 3 1
0 1 2
(a)
5.10.
4
0
0
6 1+j 2'
1-j
5
-1
2 - 1 6
0
0"
6
0
0 -2
(b)
(c)
4
6
2
6
9
3
9 12 16
(d)
KXX = [y/2 4
Find a linear transformation C such that Y = CX will have
Kyy =
1 0
0 1
Is C a unitary transformation?
(b) Consider the two real symmetric matrices A and A' given by
A ^
a b
b c
a' b'
Show that when a = c and a' = c', the product A A' is real symmetric. More
generally, show that if A and A7 are any real symmetric matrices then AA'
will be symmetric if AA7 = A'A.
PROBLEMS
301
2-1
2 5 0
-10
4
(SHCS)
such that Fi and y2 are independent. Compute the joint pdf of Yi, Y2.
5.17. Show that if X = (JCU..., Xn)T has mean fj>= (/jlu ..., jzn)T and covariance
has mean
and variance