Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
LTFRB
Petitioners challenge this Court to issue a writ
of mandamuscommanding respondents LTFRB
and DOTC torequire PUVs touse compressed
natural gas (CNG) asalternative fuel.Asserting
their right to clean air, petitionerscontend that
thebases for their petition for a writ
of mandamus to order theLTFRB to require PUVs
to useCNG as an alternative fuel, lie inSection
16, Article II of the 1987 Constitution, our ruling
in Oposa v. Factoran, Jr.,and Section 4 of
Republic Act No. 8749otherwise known asthe
"Philippine Clean Air Act of 1999."
Issue:
WON LTFRB CAN BE COMPELLED
TOREQUIREPUVs TO USE CNG THROUGH A WRIT
OFMANDAMUS?
Held:
NO. Petitioners invoke the provisions of
theConstitutionand the Clean Air Act in their
prayer for issuance of a writ of mandamus
commanding therespondents to require PUVs
touse CNG as an alternativefuel. Although both
are generalmandates that do notspecifically
enjoin the use of any kind of fuel,
particularlythe use of CNG, there is an executive
order implementing a program on the use of
CNG by public vehicles.ExecutiveOrder No. 290,
MMDA vs Jancom
Posted on October 14, 2008 by danabatnag
MMDA v. Jancom
Date: Jan 30, 2002
Petitioner: MMDA
Respondent: Jancom
Ponente: Melo, J.
Nature: Petition for review on certiorari under Rule 45
of the Rules of Civil Procedure
Facts of the case: After bidding for a waste
management project with the MMDA, Jancom won a
contract for the MMDAs San Mateo waste
management project. A BOT contract for the waste to
energy project was signed on Dec 19, 1997, between
Jancom and the Philippine Government, represented by
the Presidential Task Force on Solid Waste
Management through DENR Secretary Victor Ramos,
CORD-NCR chair Dionisio dela Serna, and MMDA chair
Prospero Oreta.
The contract, however, was never signed by President
Ramos as it was too close to the end of his term. He
endorsed it to President Estrada, but Estrada refused