Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
pdf (jur77)
[title :] Who guards the guardians of justice in Strasbourg?
or
A decision good for the East
by
(to see also the name
[author:] S.P.
of the sender,(x) Page 13/34)
[source:] (x) http://steprom.atwebpages.com/
<----------\<CTRL+clic on x
[version / date:] 2013.06 / 2013-06-30 14:00
to follow link
[motto of the author:] what's wrong with signatures in .this pictures?
fig(1)
fig(2)
- - - <CTRL+clic on x to follow link------->
fig(1+2)=overlapping(1)and(2)
[details: see (x)Page 11/34 and next]
34 /34
34/34
Prior note :
To the attention of those who have only about 5 min or who promote the essential to the
detriment of details: go directly to the page 3/34 ; it is a shortcut toward the first named
variant micro (petition by email; see the table of contents) ; this could be a starting point
for the other variants.
The main idea
in discussion : the present judicial system is sufficient to maintain the social order, or it is
necessary to reinforce it by extra - judicial means, including the restriction of the access
to the public documents?
The main event
is an atypical, bizarre - and, at least, doubtful, as for its authenticity - transmission of
documents under the heading of an European judicial institution. .
This event has
been followed of several tentative of a citizen pre- occupied of justice interested to clarify
it - including before of other judicial authorities - without any useful result, in a generally
no-friendly context for the access to the public documents.
The author doesn't intend a concrete analysis of reasons or a legitimate action
close to authorities (in accordance with their regulations), that after having received reactions
on behalf of recipients including authority, in a reasonable delay. At the same time,
the author puts questions and suggest explanations in a hypothetical analysis, in similar
situations, to the section Instead of epilogue in one of variants.
2
Variants :
The present text is an explanatory introduction to a letter in 3 variants
(micro, mini and maxi):
-a pre- established letter of adherence-support in favor of a (re - )analysis of a request
(simplified, situated in the section micro, of the type e-mail petition, advisable to the
physical, individual people or communities, promoting the essential to the detriment of
details - containing 2 pages of text and several images, from page 3/34, based simply on
the direct interpretation of some images ; letter sent by e-mail, following a personal decision;
-a minimal letter (containing more details, situated in the section mini, advisable in
principle to parliamentarians and diplomatic personnel, containing 3 pages from page 13/34,
included in the extended letter, by idented paragraphs ( moved from the left margin) , and
-an extended letter (in-extenso, situated in the section maxi, advisable among others to the
legal persons and institutions, including press, containing 5 pages plus notes from page
16/34, documented in detail, accompanied of a chronology simplifying, letter easy to read
and maybe otherwise pleasant;
Structure of the letters:
micro (email)
mini (minimalist)
facts : page 4/34
facts :
-derivative and deducted by
interpretation of pictures
-'A'
page 14/34
demands :
page 13/34
-(re-)analyze and
-verification of documents
demands :
-'B'
page 14/34
maxi (extent)
facts :
-'A1' page 18/34
-'A2' page 18/34
-'A3' conclusions page 20/34
demands :
- 'B1' page 21/34
- 'B2' instead of the epilog
page 21/34
In version maxi (extent), facts of before and after the aforementioned main event are
organized in two sections (' A1 ' and ' A2 '), follow-up of conclusions ;
demands contain the section ' B1 ' and the section ' B2 ', instead of the epilog .
In the minimal version the two sections of facts form the unified section ' A', follow-up of the
demand section ' B'.
Notations : ___ x ___ = underlining of ' x'; [x] = x is optional ;
(Notes in brackets [] ' (hooks) are optional.)
(x) = <CTRL+ click on x to follow link>
x/34 = page x of /34 from this file, e.g. 3/34 is this page; not to confound with
pag03--a55v.pdf which is a file of type .pdf [ notation imposed by reasons of compatibility
with a (former) version on paper].
Clarifications :
A copy on paper signed for conformity could arrive to your address, if it is necessary; with
proofs in the legal sense, and facsimiles, various useful materials in a possible investigation
will be able to be the object of supplementary clarifications. Documents at pages 7/34, 9/34
and 30-31/34 are available for forensic expertise.
3
(i1b)
(i1c)
(i1d)
...............................................................................................................................................
i2. indirectly , by SMS (SMS = Short Message Service, on mobile phones), through the
applicant, to his phone number : +40728605986 ( in extreme lack of time situations, as an
exception, not recommended ) illustrated in this figures :
MOBILE : SCREEN - SMS - TEXT
_______________________
/
New Message
\
|_______________________ _ |
|I support demands in
|
| attach.pdf from the site
|
|STEPROM.atwebpages.com |
|
|
|2012.10.21|
|uk-london-EastLondon|
|jjd- jjdoe@yahoo.com
|
|.________________________.|
[options]
^
[Back]
|
<
O
>
|
| \
v
/ |
| [1 ]
[2 abc] [3 def]
|
| [4 ghi] [5 jkl] [6 mno]
|
| [7pqrs] [8 tuv] [9wxyz]
|
| [* ]
[0 + ]
[# ]
|
\_________________________/
[In detail :]
In order to signal to the applicant the decision to support him , send a SMS message
to tel. +40728 605 986 ,
containing a text of identification (e-mail ID required
for possibly verification), for ex.:
I support demands from attach.pdf on the site STEPROM. atwebpages.com
2012.10.21-uk-london-EastLondon-jjd-jjdoe@yahoo.com
5
fig. ' APPENDIX 58' from file (x)..\COMMONcommun\RESPONSESrponses\pag29-a57R+a58.pdf and extract of site [in dec.2012](x) www.echr.coe.int/echr/en/hudoc/ click
on /HUDOC Collections: /HUDOC database, select only Decisions / Admissibility, fill
Number of case /(''52534/99'') / Search >result: 0[zero] results found (to read/verify:
view / zoom factor recommended : 200 )
donneaucun rsultat /did not return any results (view / zoom factor recommended : 200 )
10
(repetition to highlight )
fig(1)extract-APPENDIX 57 R appendix 57 R|
fig(2)extract-APPENDIX 58 appendix 58|
fig(1+2) overlapping 'APPENDIX 57R+58'
11
fig(1)
fig(1)
fig(2)
fig(1+2)
12
---------------------------------------------------------------text of attachment :
To the attention of
Jean-Claude Mignon, president of the Parliamentary assembly of the Council of Europe
(address email :
webmaster.assembly@coe.int)
If
1. pictures of the attachment under the header of the Council of Europe ( CoE ) represent
documents, printed, signed really and delivered on behalf of this institution ;
2. the snapshot excerpt of the Hudoc public data base from the official site of CoE is rel ;
then
A. I note irregularities:
A1. no. of file 52534 / 99 is not found ( 0 [zero] results found ) in the Hudoc data
base,
A2. two signings of the clerk are overlapped, i.e. identical ;
B.I support the ___ demands ___ :
B1. to confirm the absence of named documents (as the decision), in the official public
publications (as the official journal) ;
B2. (re - )analyze, as seriously as possible, the named documents, in order to make
corrections and to give explanations.
----------------------------------------------------------------
13
[-A letter on the same subject, the accession to a certified copy addressed to
Transparency International (TI) Brussels [*0031], remained unanswered,
result of an implied refusal, according to the national postal service: "the recipient
was not present to take the sending "[*0032].]
B) requests:
14
search the public database Hudoc, the official website of the CoE for file (folder)
no. 52534/99 of the aforementioned decision (at internet address:
www.echr.coe.int/echr/fr/hudoc/ or www.echr.coe.int/echr/en/hudoc/);
confirm or infirm the
___ presence ___
of file no. 52534/99 in the database;
the answer is expected as one of the binary logic values: "YES" for the presence or "NO" for
the non-presence (absence);
[In other words, it is equivalent to the statement on page 17/34
'' A. I notice irregularities:
A1. File no. "52534/99" is not found ("0 [zero] results found") in the Hudoc database for
the micro letter.]
If you are in possession of the book named below, or in the situation to consult,
.
. -Check if the official journal book, "Reports of judgments and
. Decisions / Recueil des Arrts et dcisions 2001-VII "by C. Heymanns,
. ISBN-10: 3452254658, 530 pages
.
___ Contains ___
. the file number and the name of the applicant:
. "52534/99 - Stelian Pascanu c / Romania"
.
. (As a succession of alphanumeric characters), the answer is
. expected as a binary logic values: "YES" or "NO";
.
. -If such claims can not be done, let me know your
. opinion on the right of access to such information by the undersigned; if your opinion is
. favorable, please record it in writing, in the same binary logic, in a
. non-contestable formula, such as "the applicant
. ___ has ___ the right to know the decision of the European Court in Strasbourg
. by public___ publication___, including by the official journal. ";
``
. -Any other contribution to unravel the mysteries / unanswered.questions will be welcome;
Please accept Sir / Madam,
Stelian Pascanu / ____________________
-------------------------------------------------- ---------------------- Notes:
[*0010] pag30 - a59i + a62.pdf
[See below an extract from a facsimile of the Annex 59i,
Page 71/85 File-pag08 a69vii.pdf]
[ECHR / C. of E. ]
FIRST SECTION
ECHR-LF11.2R Strasbourg on 6 August 2001
15
CSA / RFT
52534/99 (inadmissible)
[...]
When your application for a certified copy of the decision [...] I note that this document
already sent to you attached to the letter of January 5, 2001
[...] Section Registrar (Clerk)
[*0016]
pag19 - 69viii - ti no.pdf
[*0022] pagX32 - a69viii-ue2.pdf
[*0023] pag34-a69viii - UE2-r.pdf
[*0031]
pagX36 - a75-IT-EA - fr + en.pdf
pagX37 - a75-IT-EA - de.pdf
pag36 - a75-TI-p.pdf
pag37 - a75-TI - EA - ret.pdf
pag37-back-a75-TI - EA - ret.pdf
pag38 - a75-TI - EA - ro - ret.pdf
postal return
postal return
postal return
16
.
[jur58iiext '. jpg]
.
Select / tick one or more boxes (letters a..f )
.
the aforesaid overlapping explains [ ;-) ]:
. a. economy of consumables (ink), due to
. economic crisis ;
. b. imminent [yet! ], but not yet effective, inauguration
. of the famous European Public Prosecutor;
. c. lack of "jurisdiction to deal with complaints
. against an international court, "according to the Prosecutor's Office of
. TGI Strasbourg, after several months of reflection;
. d. "Business climate" and a "sense of public corruption"
. denounced by a former Attorney General at the Cour de Cassation;
. e. restricted, summarized procedure, during summer judicial vacancy;
.(period July, 1 to August, 31)
. f. solution such as "good for the East."
17
Parliament [*13] and, again, not to mention the comments that the press made public on
public climate [*14].
The Secretariat of the Committee of Ministers treated a claim of the applicant in an classic
administrative way, delivering it directly to an official who answered in the spirit in which
the claimed part did earlier, by mail without specifying the name of the sender on the
envelope; here is the second "production" of non-compliant documents under the heading of
the Council of Europe [*15].
.
. The applicant did send by registered Italian mail a certified letter [*0016]
. to Mr. J. B. signatory to the list at NouvelObs and member support of the
. said access to documents; no response has arrived at the address of the
. applicant by national postal service or otherwise; by the said letter, the
. applicant sought the support of Transparency International (TI) for
. access to a copy of a decision of the ECHR; note the
. communication by foreign postal service.
"Mother Europe" - or perhaps "Bitter Europe," according to the preferences [*17] - isn't
exaggerating, also, in favor of public access to documents [*18], to no longer recall the
famous European Public Prosecutor promised for years, which could deal with the
restriction of access by criminal means; moreover, total silence on the theory of pillars, in an
addressed letter [*19].
Two divisions of the European Commission are expressed in
European dialect, one providing a free lesson, not sought, of administrative law categorizing
the trial as "problems of general administration of justice" [*20] and on the other side
containing the recommendation in implicit response, to reiterate, sometimes for the third
time, the same previous approaches [*21].
.
. - The applicant submitted an administrative request on paper to an Assistant Secretary
. of the European Commission on the same subject, the accession to a certified copy ,
. supposedly included to the internal Commission's documentation [*0022] request
. including in appendices, among other things, the letter to Mr. J. B.; the
. applicant acknowledged receipt of an email message in response containing
. the recommendation to repeat the same previous steps, without mention of
. said internal documentation of the Commission [*0023]; note the communication by
. internet, without delivery from national postal service.
Neither EuroJust does not feel better - so to speak - even ignoring accuses of corruption to
the address of the former president, his problem is internal affair; the applicant's request for
investigation about his request was denied apparent lack of prejudice expressed explicitly by
a third party, prejudice that is a normative requirement by the procedural rules of EuroJust
(implicitly confirmed in a letter of reply - see "pag35 a74-ej-in-r.pdf");
it appears
that two complaints made by the applicant to two representatives (Cons. of E. and PACE)
were not sufficient to access their agendas,in order to suggest a prejudice [*24]. It also
appears (is it right?) that a last cryptic and sibylline reminiscence of the spirit of duty finally
emerged in the paragraph of the list of documents; in fact, the only document mentioned
among the dozens received by EuroJust concerns (is it the true path to said "St. Grail "? - Yes,
that is it, you have already guessed, that is ...) the prosecutor; would - they be true the
19
observations that the press made on public climate? (See also [*14]), and again, would it be
true some discreet intervention of a reputed NGO from overseas and one of its continental
sections [*25] to deliver at least one response of the prosecution, even unfavorable, even after
8 months? (To note the thanks of the applicant - notes [*26]).
Two other letters sent to an embassy [*27] and another addressed to TI (Tribunal d'Instance)
Strasbourg containing a simple standard type request for a copy[*28];
another addressed to the Sub-Committee on Human Rights of the European Parliament
[*29] and several addressed to Transparency International (TI) [*30] [*0031], all on the
subject of accessing a legal copy of the aforesaid decision , also remained
___unanswered ___.
[Notation: ___ x ___ = underline 'x' by the author]
.
. -A letter on the same subject, the accession to a certified copy addressed to
. Transparency International (TI) Brussels [*0031], remained unanswered,
. result of an implied refusal, according to the national postal service: "the recipient
. was not present to take the sending "[*0032].
.
Instead of conclusions: ............................................... A3
These are the conditions of widespread rejection
[abstract:] In law, in order to start an investigation of a crime, cause of prejudice
of an individual (such as falsification of signatures in a judicial decision or obstruction of
access of the individual to the same document, i.e. abuse of the office of Registrar /Clerk, ), a
procedural rule of EuroJust asks the presence of a 2nd prejudice - of prestige, or authority ,
etc - to a third legal person, generally institutions, named third below; per a contrario ;
no prejudice means no investigation . In fact,
--the third, among others: the (1st Section of the) ECHR, the PACE (Parliamentary
Assembly) and the Committee of ministers of the Council of Europe, relativizes, especially
by silence, the access to the public documents by means of judicial ___ publication ___ by
writing (concretely, the access to decision no. 54534/99 that should be, but according to
appearances, is not published in Reports of judgments and decisions / Recueil des Arrts et
dcisions , 2001-VII par Heymanns C., ISBN-10 : 3452254658; 530 pages)
--the third don't declare any prejudice concerning the aforesaid judicial __ non publication __ by writing; and therefore per a contrario no investigation is started to EuroJust ;
--a national public prosecutor's office rejected a complaint for infringement of forgery
against an international jurisdiction because of a treaty, in spite of the different opinions
in the doctrine .
Under these conditions, would be somebody surprised by the resolution of the High
Commissioner for Human Rights in Geneva ?: [ which ]"is not able to attend [you...] for
reasons [... : -The] complaint is being considered or has been considered by the [ECHR ]
-The State Party has made a reservation to the Optional Protocol or to the International
Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, under which your complaint can not be considered ";
which essentially is, in judicial slang, a negative conflict of jurisdiction (see APPENDIX 62
- note [*33]).
The complainant requests: ............................................................................requests (B1) ..
. [Subsection -common, see [*09]]
20
[despite] the art 47.5 of the Rules of Court. "- see [*34]
As for the international media, the NouvelObs and Access Info Europe have already been
mentioned as critics of the transparency policy of the Council, by opening lists of member
protesters, including the applicant; the site leschroniques.net explains on judicial, historical
and sociological perspective the phenomenon of
"denial of justice characterized by an intolerable infringement on the most basic human
rights, to be tried by a court" certifying officers of the ECHR in good faith and honesty; the
applicant appreciates that in the first instance, the editors of the site will refuse to believe
and to publish any of the accuses of this letter.
All approaches to elucidating have resulted in equivocal responses on
authenticity, or also not found in ___ any ___ public official databases ; the ___ only ___
evidence of genuine response from the institution named "ECHR" seems to be [*35] the
receipt / delivery of the complaint, see "pag03 - a55v.pdf."
Can an entity of almost billion Europeans (E.U.) or 800 millions (CoE) manage something
as simple as the identification of a responsible for infringement of forgery, in ___ their ___
European institutions ? (Remember E.U. wants to be part of CoE as an Member Entity).
After posting dozens and dozens of equivocal pages about European justice in years
and years, ___ and after all ___, is it mandatory for said justice to find and punish that
responsible ?
What can they say about the ethics of the officiants, in a political
environment claimed to be submitted to high (and maybe divine ?) moral commandments,
environment situated in key decision positions, for years and years?
Were they wright
the high-rank exponents of this environment when they warned about possible contagion with
corruption of the hard-core of the European establishment from the new-comers from the
said other side of Europe ?; towards a peripheral European corruption or towards a
pure-and-simple European corruption ?
[The main idea in discussion ]: the present judicial system is sufficient to maintain the
social order, or it is necessary to reinforce it by extra - judicial means, including the
restriction of the access to the public documents?
What is the limit of hypocrisy
of an authority, even European, which in a simple patron- employee conflict , goes
openly alongside the patron, by favoring him with a procedure not only
immoral, but plainly illicit ?
What have to say, in this case, the defenders of the
famous protestant work ethic or the center-left-wing caviar supporters, after denying
for more than 15 years of trial/judgment the right to work by such means ?
Is it
abject(i.e.: despicable, vile, wretched, by an explanatory dictionary ) or "abject cowardice"
sufficient to describe said hypocrisy ?
Where is the famous principle of equality of
weapons of the two sides ?
What are the performance criteria of the justice done at
the ECHR after more than 15 years of trial, without results published in the Official Journal?
And by extension, what is the effectiveness of a famous "mechanism for
cooperation and verification" best known by its abbreviation, "M.C.V.", if the filter did not
retained any reference to this file for a long time?
This "M.C.V." error is a purely
technical issue of "general justice administration" or there are other reasons, less technical?
Perhaps the resemblance of some political color?
In this case, it seems the
solution is only one of prefabricated items "made in Europe. which comes from the EU see the European Commission in Brussels and from the Council- see the Venice Commission
22
- on a rolling tape eastward together with others, including some guidelines of "good
practice". government [from Brussels] or an - already famous - referendum procedure with
cvorum during the summer of 2012, concerning the representative of a Member State [from
Venice].
Is it applicable the concept of "state terrorism" and by extension, of an entity with state
characteristics - in this case? (see definition of terror [*36]).
Remember that in
an article on this notion Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia mentions as the first method of state
terrorism and by extension, of such an entity -"expeditious (fast) courts , and superficial
(including the fastest, those who avoid the publication of their decisions - to save time, isn' t
it?)" although that term is applicable in the present situation only in non-violent sense.thanks to God ? - till now .
Here is a comparison with two terms / situations:
1. on one hand, in European law:
the [''']principle of publicity / publication of court documents seems to be [']excepted from
application for at least (according to author) one of the litigants from ['']<<the other side of
the Europe >>;
2. on the other hand, in his book <<About the native population. Anatomy of a legal
"monster": colonial law >> Olivier Le Cour Grandmaison wrote:
So the political and [']legal exception of the colonial legislation becomes the rule for
['']<<Natives>>. Colonial law is a [''']<<law without principle>> [...]
or, in a synopsis of common / similar concepts in two columns:
1.
|
2.
['].
excepted [from application] |
[legal] exception
[''].
<<The other side of Europe >>
|
<<Natives>>
[''']
the principle of publicity[excepted | <<law without principle>>
from appl.]|
Finally, a riddle: which other law the European law begins to look like ?
The applicant determines its response, concerning the main idea, depending on recipients of
the letters, within a reasonable time.
Please accept, Madam / Sir,
Stelian Pascanu / ____________________
-------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------- Notes
[*01]:
[extract -translation from the journal Ziua ("The Day") of 1995-11-21" - see facsimiles of
files "pag03--Ziua1995112??. jpg" ( ?? = 1a, 1b, 2a, 2b, 1a--, 1b-- )]
----------------------------------------------------------------
23
pag03--Ziua19951121a. jpg
24
[Paragraph] The "D. Effect" paralyzes Justice [] [i.e. The effect of the lack of
irremovability - D.=Dide is the name of the initiator-- note of sollicitant]
Justice [...] is violently jolted by the "D. Effect". Judges without irremovability are unable
to exercise their profession. The [...] judges are challenged by lawyers, saying the
"Exception D." became __ common knowledge__. Thousands of proceedings [...]
are likely to be affected by nullity.
[Title] Courts [...] have been bombarded with "Exceptions D." by Rasvan Savaliuc
[That is to say, lack of irremovability ...] citizens and their advocates have raised the
"Exception D." showing the courts that they do not want their lawsuits are tried by judges
who have no irremovability [...]
[Title] [...] by Magdalena .Dumitru - The refusal of irremovability may attract legal tragic
consequences [] MD: The time expressly provided by the Act is imperative.
[Title] The Court of Brasov in disarray [...] by M.Petrascu
[...] Have invoked the exception of the lack of irremovability requested by the mandatory
provisions of the Act [...]
[*02] see below jur55v.jpg
or file pag03 - a55v. Pdf
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 25
[ jur55v.jpg]
26
(En)
593,807
32,934
37,735
Rception
39,755
pag16--a69viii--ap-ch.pdf ap=PAce/APce,ch=Suiza/Switzerland/Conf.Hlvetique
1,704,837 pag17--a69viii-ap-ch-tr2.pdf
543,284
87,872
33,521
1,573,305 pag24--a69viii--scdh-adr.pdf
51,497
67,439
pagX29--a72.pdf
32,804
pagX30--a72--en.pdf
"
London
1,377,819 pagX31-0--a72-en-adr.pdf
37,997 pagX32--a69viii-ue2.pdf ue2= Secretario Adjunto/Assist.Secr./Secr.Adj.
commission EU
385,919 pagX33--a69viii-ue2_JPG.PDF
271,531 pagX33--a69viii-ue2-en_JPG.PDF
1,610,172 pagX34--a69viii-ue2-en-tr.pdf
179,862 pagX35--a74-ej-en.PDF
ej=EuroJust
352,710 pagX36--a75-TI_EA-en-fr.PDF
307,347 pagX37--a75-TI_EA-de.pdf
117,883 pagX38--a75-TI_ro.PDF
TI_ro=Transp. Int'l Ro
158,096 pagX38verso--a75-TI_en+fr.pdf
281,075 pagX39--a69viii-craj-ro.pdf craj-ro=centro contra la corrupcin en la justicia
/justice anticorruption center/ centre [de ressources] anticorruption en justice
214,734 pagX39verso--a69viii-craj-ro.pdf
38,583 pagX39--a69viii-craj-en+fr.pdf
38,542 pagX39verso'--a69viii-craj-en+fr.pdf
104,684 pagX40--a75-TI_ro+craj-ro-ar_a.PDF ar= AvisoDeRecibo /note of
28
Receipt/AvisDeRception
105,110 pagX40--a75-TI_ro+craj-ro-ar_b.PDF
craj-ro=centro/center/ centre
91,758 pagX40verso--a75-TI_ro+craj-ro-ar_a.PDF
526,581 pagX40verso--a75-TI_ro+craj-ro-ar_b.PDF
=========Directory ..\COMMONcommun\RESPONSESrponses ==========
- - - -- - - - - - - - -notation -r=Response[Rponse] - - - - - - - - -- - - - 150,065
864,524
pag29--a57R+a58.pdf
1,309,148 pag30--a59i+a62.pdf
843,150
pag31--a69vii-r.pdf
992,341
808,199
pag35--a74-ej-en-r.pdf ej=EuroJust
1,889,374 pag36--a75-TI-p.pdf
90,858
pag36--a75-TI-EA-ret-a.PDF retour
73,025
pag36--a75-TI-EA-ret-b.PDF
662,276
pag37--a75-TI_EA-p.pdf retour
44,787
pag37verso--a75-TI_EA-p-a.pdf retour
241,323
pag37verso--a75-TI_EA-p-b.pdf
325,373
pag38--a75-TI-EA-ro-ret-a.PDF
328,842
pag38--a75-TI-EA-ro-ret-b.PDF
38,751
pag38verso--a75-TI-EA-fr+en-ret.pdf
Embajada /Embassy/Ambass.
151 pag05--a69viii--f--nr.txt
f= Embajada /Embassy/Ambass.
86 pag07--a69ii--nr.txt
TI (Trib.dInstance)
112 pag10-1--a69viii--ti--nr.txt
29
235 pag22--a69viii--scdh--nr.txt
160 pagX29--a72--nr.txt
606 pagX36--a75-TI_EA-en-fr-de-nr.txt TI_EA=Transp. Int'l Eu+Asia
95 pagX38--a75-TI_ro--nr.txt Transp. Int'l Romania
334 pagX39--a69viii-craj-ro--nr.txt craj-ro=centro contra la corrupcin en la justicia
/justice anticorruption center/ centre [de ressources] anticorruption en justice
[*09] Subsections Identes (offset from the margin, flush right) are
common to letters mini[minimum] and maxi[extended].
[*0010] pag30 - a59i + a62.pdf
[See below an extract from a facsimile of the Annex 59i,
Page 71/85 File-pag08 a69vii.pdf]
[ECHR / C. of E. ]
FIRST SECTION
ECHR-LF11.2R Strasbourg on 6 August 2001
CSA / RFT
52534/99 (inadmissible)
[...]
When your application for a certified copy of the decision [...] I note that this document
already sent to you attached to the letter of January 5, 2001
[...] Registrar (Clerk) of the Section
[*11] intellectual false, forgery, abuse in office, usurpation (theft) of official etc.;
the first two correspond to the French- C.Pnal art.441-1-al.1 and 2 and appear
together with the type of the competent court (TGI) as conclusions, following
an analysis, in the file "pag08-2 - a69vi-bis.pdf "annexed to the criminal complaint.
This file is the result of the execution of an "expert system" program, similar to programs
already accepted as a accessory means of reasoning in some instances, programs that
generate conclusions, line by line, by drawing step-by-step, each inference cycle..
[*12]
"For its part, the French "Cour de Cassation" in the name of the preservation of international
relations, uphold the immunity of the foreign state in question on the right of access to justice
protected by ConvEHR Article 6 (Report of the "Cour de Cassation" in 1995, French
documentation, p. 418-419). However, when it is to deprive the plaintiff of any opportunity to
take legal action against a State or an international organization, the immunity may be refused
to avoid the risk of denial of justice (CA Paris, 7 October 2003, Gaz. Pal. No. 15 2005 p. 2) "taken from: Adversarial relationship between immunity and impunity - Commentary on
article by Prof. Dr. Paech, "Staatenimmunitt und Kriegsverbrechen" in Archiv des
Vlkerrechts by Nomie Coutrot-Cieslinski | M2BDE
30
[*13] http://www.roportal.ro/stiri/cazul-severin-transparency-international-cere-anchetabelgiana-o-corespondenta-de-la-magda-3332360.htm
Saturday, March 26, 2011 at 2:07 pm Print
If "Severin" - Transparency International calls for investigation in Belgium. Correspondence
Magdalena Moreh.
The Brussels office of Transparency International has asked the Belgian authorities to take
over the investigation of 3 members [European Parliament], including [AS], who took [the]
money to various amendments to EU legislation. [] should the Belgian federal authorities
take the 3 [members], taking into account the allegations of corruption [which] took place on
Belgian territory.
[*14] "The investigation of the [Nouvel]Obs> EXCLUSIVE. Jean-Louis Nadal:"They
disfigured the justice "... By Agathe Logeart (excerpt) << For the first time, the former Attorney General at the "Cour de Cassation"
denounced "business climate" and a "sense of public corruption." >>
[*15]
query: pag09 - a69viii--m.pdf
answer: pag32--a69viii-m-p+r.pdf
instead of the name of the sender: "Secretariat of the Committee of Ministers'
on the envelope below is the message:
"If undeliverable
please return to:
CC International
SPI FR167
1211 Geneve 2
Switzerland "
-------------------------------------------------------------
31
[*0016]
pag19--69viii--ti--no.pdf
[*17] word games in French, untranslatable, based on a similar pronunciation of words
"mother" (mother / madre / mama) and "bitter" (bitter / amargo / amar) in
en / es / ro;
[*18] pag11--a69viii--ue.pdf
case "f) communication-response to the petition to the Committee of Ministers (see
Appendices 69viii-m and 69viii-m-r , arrived after 8 months"
see also files pag09--a69viii-m.pdf and pag32--a69viii-m-p+r.pdf
[*19] pagX32--a69viii--ue2
.. . Theory of pillars, of which the pillar "community" and the third pillar, "of decisions"
[*20] pag33--a69viii--ue-r
[*21] pag34--a69viii--UE2-r
[*0022] pagX32--a69viii-ue2.pdf
[*0023] pag34-a69viii--UE2-r.pdf
[*24] pag13--a69viii-cm2 -- en +fr+ ru.pdf
pag15--a69viii-cm2-ru-p.pdf
pag16--a69viii--ap-ch.pdf
32
pag18--a69viii-ap-ch-ar2.pdf
[*25] pag10--a69viii--ai.pdf
AI France
Embassy of France
standard request
[*29] pag22--a69viii--scdh.pdf
pag24--a69viii-HRSC-adr.pdf
[*30] pag10-1--a69viii--ti.pdf
pag19--a69viii-ti-no--to + en + no.pdf
pag21--a69viii-ti-no-ar.pdf
pagX38--a75-TI--ro.pdf
pagX40--a75-TI--ro-tr.pdf
pagX40-back-a75 IT--ro-tr.pdf
[*0031]
pagX36--a75-IT-EA--fr + en.pdf
pagX37--a75-IT-EA--de.pdf
pag36--a75-TI-p.pdf postal return
pag37--a75-TI--EA--ret.pdf postal return
pag37-back-a75-TI--EA--ret.pdf
pag38--a75-TI--EA--ro--ret.pdf postal return
[*0032] "destinatarul nu s-a prezentat sa ridice timiterea"--in original
[*33] see APPENDIX 62--pag30--a59i + a62.pdf
see also an excerpt from Annex 62 on page 77/89 File pag08--a69vii.pdf
[*34] review "IN JUSTITIE" 15/2002--November
The antechamber ECHR Romanian land? (II) by [lawyer]. G. B.
For many Romanians for a long time, the European Court of Human Rights was the
last safeguard, the miracle at the end of the earth, where justice and truth can not be doubted,
for much less trampled. A litigant ... trying to show that Romanian officials of the European
Court of Human Rights obstruct access to files and select according to rules known only by
them.
33
On ... January 31, 2002, Mihai Moldoveanu, ... lodged a complaint with ECHR [...] has been
received, recorded under no. PP31642, Moldoveanu c / Romania [...] until September 30,
when the tone of the letter, signed by the clerk were changed radically from
perspective of the signer, clerk C. Sandru, the request is not considered
as recorded [despite] the art 47.5 of the Rules of Court. [...] But the problem remains: the
respect of an international institution [ECHR] respect that must be
restored, also for some responsible of the ECHR
[* 35]
If the note of receipt / delivery of the complaint (pag03-a55v.pdf) is not genuine- which is
probable, considering several dysfunctions of the national postal station that transmitted the
sending - then sending is not recorded at the Palace of Europe (at the ECHR) in Strasbourg
and the prosecution is in error in declining jurisdiction: "[the prosecutor] has no jurisdiction
to deal with complaints against an international court" ,and should grant a criminal complaint
of the applicant, and then ___ no ___ proof of genuine response from the "ECHR" is in the
possession of the applicant
[*36]
[Encyclopdia Universalis extract - definition:]
Terror is a state, a exacerbated fear[...] a process of government
allowing the power to break up, because of extreme measures
and group fear, those who resist.
[Interpretation - author's note:]
-extreme measures? - Falsification, forgery etc.
-Group fear? - Fear amenable to citizen in quasi-infinite trial (about 15 years) [more to this
case, minimum 2 years for 2 litigation in two separate trials in the country of origin, including
one litigation won by the author - see chronology. pdf]
-those who resist it? - Said citizen , part in litigations between employers-parts-of-state and
employees [remember CoE is an intergovernmental organisation], employees subjects to the
(new) labor law in their country of origin.
#a.
#b.
34
#########
Annexes list-of-files
content of list[e].pdf # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #
#########
Annexes chronology
content of chrono[a30ii].pdf # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #