Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
August 2000
Introduction
A significant challenge in many mineral and coal processing plants is to utilize
the installed cyclones to produce a fine separation at high feed densities. This
requires numerous small diameter cyclones operating at high pressure drop
leading to higher operating and capital expenses. The new Krebs gMAX cyclone
produces a separation 35% finer than traditionally designed cyclones allowing
the use of larger diameter units and/or lower operating pressure drop.
The primary problem associated with operating small cyclones at high pressure drop is
high cyclone and pump wear. This results in high manpower requirements for
maintenance and often in poor cyclone performance. In large operations, the number of
required cyclones results in large floor space requirements and difficulty splitting the
slurry equally between all of the cyclones. Larger diameter cyclones tend to mitigate
these problems but have not been capable of producing the fine separation required at
many operations.
Figure 1
Page 1 of 7
Krebs Engineers recognized the limitations of cyclones with 12-15 mm thick rubber
liners in grinding circuits and in 1990, introduced a whole new line of Super Cyclones
with 25 mm thick liners and other design feature to minimize wear. These cyclones
range from 250 mm to 840 mm in diameter. Today nearly all cyclones 250 mm and
larger installed in mineral processing plants utilize thicker replaceable liners. An
exception is coal plants that use all ceramic liners in the cyclones.
In recent years, cyclone companies have introduced ramped or modified involute inlet
designs with claims of greatly improved cyclone performance. While some
improvements have been made in inlet head wear life, a ramped inlet design tends to
result in a lower capacity cyclone with no improvement in the cyclone separation. The
full involute feed shown in Figure 2 with curved corners provides the best performance
while not compromising on wear life. Figure 3 illustrates the performance differences
between an involute feed entry design and the relatively new ramped design. While the
performance is similar, the involute feed cyclone has significantly higher capacity.
Figure 2
Page 2 of 7
FEED C ONDITIONS: 55-57% Solids, 65-70% +38 micron, ~35% +212 micron
100
90
80
70
60
K rebs 250 mm Cy clone with Involute Feed, 10.5 degree cone, 85 m 3/h
50
40
30
20
10
0
10
100
1000
Figure 3
Typically cyclones have used a cylinder section length equal to one cyclone diameter in
combination with a 20-degree cone section. For finer separations the traditional
approach was to add a second cylinder section. While the longer cylinder section
provided greater residence time and thus more capacity, it also reduced the tangential
velocity. This results in minimal if any improvement in cyclone separation. The higher
capacity with the longer cylinder section did allow cyclone manufacturers to provide
smaller vortex finders, which does improve cyclone performance.
A better approach is to use a longer cone angle. Figure 4 illustrates the difference
between 10 and 20 degree cones. The longer cone produced a finer and sharper
separation at a higher unit capacity. A number of cyclone manufacturers use longer
cones on 150 to 500 mm cyclones and in the past 3 years most new cyclones in this
size range have the longer cone sections. Side by side cyclone testwork in which one
cyclone has a 10-degree cone versus the other cyclone with a 20-degree cone will
greatly favor the cyclone with the longer cone regardless of the inlet design.
Longer cone sections alone are not the answer. Maintaining the tangential velocity at
its maximum is the key to optimal cyclone performance.
Page 3 of 7
FEED CONDITIONS: 55-57% Solids, 65-70% +38 micron, ~35% +212 micron
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
10
100
1000
Figure 4
Page 4 of 7
sharper upper cone to accelerate tangential velocity and then a gradual tapering lower
cone to provide residence time for a finer separation. This results in a much better
performing cyclone at an overall length similar to a standard cyclone.
Finally the apex angle and design also has a big effect on performance. The gMAX
design incorporates an optimal apex angle in combination with a straight section to
maintain the finest possible separation with maximum dewatering.
This combination of the correct cylinder length with the right cone angles and apex
design, along with the improved feed section is the basis of the new patented Krebs
gMAX cyclone. Figures 5 and 6 illustrate the gMAX design.
Figure 6
Figure 5
Figure 7 illustrates the performance differences between the Krebs gMAX cyclone,
standard involute inlet cyclone with 10 and 20-degree cones, and ramped inlet cyclone
with a 10-degree cone. The gMAX cyclone results in a 35-40% finer separation
compared to the 20-degree cone and a 20-25% finer separation versus the 10-degree
cone cyclones. The gMAX cyclone produces this finer D50 separation while
maintaining a very sharp separation. A 35-40% improvement in separation is an entire
mesh size and allows the use of a larger diameter cyclone at lower pressure drops.
Page 5 of 7
FEED CONDITIONS: 55-57% Solids, 65-70% +38 micron, ~35% +212 micron
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
10
100
1000
Figure 7
100
90
80
70
60
50
Krebs 380 mm Standard Cyclone
40
30
20
10
0
10
100
1000
Figure 8
Page 6 of 7
FEED CONDITIONS: 58% Solids, 35% +150 Micron, 0.8 bar pressure drop
South American Iron Ore Property
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
10
100
1000
Figure 9
Conclusion
The gMAX cyclone solves the problems of producing fine separations at high densities
in mineral and coal processing plants. It accomplishes this by uniquely combining the
correct cylinder length with the right cone angles and apex design, along with an
improved involute feed. These design enhancements minimize turbulence and
maximize tangential velocity in the separation zones.
Page 7 of 7