Você está na página 1de 10

After studying this chapter, you should be able to:

Human Resource
Management
ELEVENTH EDITION

1. List the basic factors in determining pay rates.


2. Explain in detail how to establish pay rates.
3. Explain how to price managerial and professional jobs.

GARY DESSLER

4. Discuss competencycompetency-based pay and other current


trends in compensation.

Part 4 | Compensation

Chapter 11

Establishing Strategic Pay Plans


2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.
All rights reserved.

PowerPoint Presentation by Charlie Cook


The University of West Alabama

2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved.

Legal Considerations in Compensation

Basic Factors in Determining


Pay Rates
Employee
Compensation

Davis-Bacon Act (1931)

Equal Pay Act (1963)

Walsh-Healey Public
Contract Act (1936)

Employee Retirement
Income Security Act (ERISA)

Title VII of the 1964


Civil Rights Act

Direct Financial
Payments

112

Indirect Financial
Payments

Employee
Compensation

Age Discrimination in
Employment Act

Fair Labor Standards Act


(1938)

Americans with
Disabilities Act

The Family and Medical


Leave Act

The Social Security Act of


1935 (as amended)

Workers Compensation

2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved.

FIGURE 111

113

Who Is Exempt? Who Is Not Exempt?

Exempt Professionals
Attorneys
Physicians
Dentists
Pharmacists
Optometrists
Architects
Engineers
Teachers
Certified public accountants
Scientists
Computer systems analysts
Nonexempt
Paralegals
Nonlicensed accountants
Accounting clerks
Newspaper writers

Exempt Executives
Corporate officers
Supervisors
Source: Jeffrey Friedman, The Fair Labor Standards Act Today: A Primer,
Compensation, January/ February 2002, p. 53. Reprinted with permission of Sage
Publications, Inc. Note: These lists are general in nature, and exceptions exist. Any
questionable allocation of exemption status should be reviewed by labor legal counsel.

2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved.

2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved.

FIGURE 112

Superintendents
General managers
Individual who is in sole charge of an
independent establishment or
branch

114

Primary Duties of White-Collar Exempt Positions

Executive (Three Duties Are Required)


1. Management of the enterprise in which the employee is employed or of a permanent
department or subdivision; AND
2. Who customarily and regularly directs the work of two or more other employees; AND
3. Who has the authority to hire or fire other employees or whose suggestions and
recommendations are given particular weight.

Nonexempt
Working foreman/forewoman
Working supervisor
Lead worker
Management trainees

Administrative (Both Duties Are Required)


1. Performance of office or nonmanual work directly related to the management or
general business operations of the employer or the employers customers; AND
2. The exercise of discretion and independent judgment with respect to matters of
significance.

Exempt Administrators
Executive assistant to the president
Personnel directors
Accountants
Purchasing agents

Professional (Either Duty Is Sufficient)


1. Performance of work requiring knowledge of an advanced type in a field of
science or learning customarily acquired by a prolonged course of specialized
intellectual instructions; OR
2. Performance of work requiring invention, imagination, originality, or talent in a
recognized field of artistic or creative endeavor.

Nonexempt
Secretaries
Clerical employees
Inspectors
Statisticians

Source: Andr Honore, The New Fair Labor Standards Act Regulations and the Sales Force:
Who is Entitled to Pay?, Compensation & Benefits Review, January/February 2006, p. 31.
115

2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved.

Reprinted by permission of
Sage Publications, Inc.
116

FIGURE 113
Independent
Contractor

Corporate Policies, Competitive Strategy,


and Compensation
Aligned Reward Strategy
 The employers basic task:


To create a bundle of rewards


rewardsa total reward package
package
that specifically elicits the employee behaviors that the firm
needs to support and achieve its competitive strategy.

 The HR or compensation manager along with top

management creates pay policies that are consistent


with the firms strategic aims.

Source: Reprinted from www.HR.BLR.com


with permission of the publisher Business
and Legal Reports Inc., 141 Mill Rock Road
East, Old Saybrook, CT 2004.
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved.

TABLE 111

117

Developing an Aligned Reward Strategy

2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved.

118

Compensation Policy Issues

Questions to Ask:

Pay for performance

1. What must our company do to be successful in fulfilling its


mission or achieving its desired competitive position?

Pay for seniority

2. What are the employee behaviors or actions necessary to


successfully implement this competitive strategy?

The pay cycle

3. What compensation programs should we use to reinforce those


behaviors? What should be the purpose of each program in
reinforcing each desired behavior?

Overtime and shift pay

4. What measurable requirements should each compensation


program meet to be deemed successful in fulfilling its purpose?

Paid and unpaid leaves

5. How well do our current compensation programs match these


requirements?

Salary compression

Salary increases and promotions


Probationary pay
Paid holidays
Geographic costs of living differences

Source: Adapted from Jack Dolmat-Connell, Developing a Reward Strategy that Delivers Shareholder
and Employee Value, Compensation and Benefits Review, MarchApril 1999, p. 51.
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved.

119

Equity and Its Impact on Pay Rates

2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved.

1110

Addressing Equity Issues


Salary Surveys

Forms of Equity

Methods to
Address Equity
Issues
External
Equity

Internal
Equity

Individual
Equity

Procedural
Equity

Job Analysis and


Job Evaluation

Performance Appraisal
and Incentive Pay
Communications, Grievance
Mechanisms, and Employees
Participation

2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved.

1111

2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved.

1112

Establishing Pay Rates

The Salary Survey

Steps in Establishing Pay Rates


1

Conduct a salary survey of what other employers are


paying for comparable jobs (to help ensure external equity).

Determine the worth of each job in your organization


through job evaluation (to ensure internal equity).

Group similar jobs into pay grades.

Price each pay grade by using wave curves.

Fine-tune pay rates.

Step 1. The Wage Survey:


Uses for Salary Surveys

To price
benchmark
jobs

2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved.

1113

Sources of Wage and


Salary Information

Employer SelfConducted
Surveys

Consulting
Firms

Professional
Associations

Government
Agencies

The
Internet

2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved.

1115

Establishing Pay Rates (contd)

To make
decisions
about benefits

2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved.

TABLE 112

Sources for Salary Surveys

To marketprice wages
for jobs

1114

Some Pay Data Web Sites

Sponsor

Internet Address

What It Provides

Downside

Salary.com

Salary.com

Salary by job and zip code,


plus job and description, for
hundreds of jobs

Adapts national averages


by applying local cost-ofliving differences

Wageweb

www.wageweb.com

Average salaries for more


than 150 clerical, professional,
and managerial jobs

Charges $169 for


breakdowns by industry,
location, etc.

U.S. Office of
Personnel
Management

www.opm.gov/oca/
07tables/

Salaries and wages for U.S.


government jobs, by location

Limited to U.S. government


jobs

Job Smart

http://jobstar.org/tools/
salary/sal-prof.php

Profession-specific salary
surveys

Necessary to review
numerous salary surveys
for each profession

moving.com

moving.com

Median salaries for thousands


of jobs, by city

Doesnt consider factors


like company size or
benefits

cnnmoney.com

cnnmoney.com

Input your current salary and


city, and this gives you
comparable salary in
destination city

Based on national averages


adapted to cost of living
differences

2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved.

1116

Establishing Pay Rates (contd)


Preparing for the Job Evaluation

Skills

Identifying the need for the job evaluation

Getting the cooperation of employees

Choosing an evaluation committee

Performing the actual evaluation

Effort
Step 2. Job Evaluation:
Identifying
Compensable Factors
Responsibility

Working Conditions

2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved.

1117

2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved.

1118

Establishing Pay Rates (contd)

Job Evaluation Methods: Ranking


Ranking each job relative to all other jobs,
usually based on some overall factor.

Methods for
Evaluating Jobs

Steps in job ranking:


1. Obtain job information.
2. Select and group jobs.

Job
Classification

Ranking

Point
Method

Factor
Comparison

3. Select compensable factors.


4. Rank jobs.
5. Combine ratings.

2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved.

TABLE 113

1119

Job Ranking by Olympia Health Care

Ranking Order

2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved.

1120

Job Evaluation Methods:


Job Classification

Annual Pay Scale

1. Office manager

Raters categorize jobs into groups or classes of


jobs that are of roughly the same value for pay
purposes.

$43,000

2. Chief nurse

42,500

3. Bookkeeper

34,000

4. Nurse

32,500

5. Cook

31,000

6. Nurses aide

28,500

7. Orderly

25,500

 Classes contain similar jobs.




Administrative assistants

 Grades are jobs similar in difficulty but otherwise

different.


Mechanics, welders, electricians, and machinists

 Jobs are classed by the amount or level of

compensable factors they contain.


2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved.

FIGURE 114

1121

Example of a Grade Level Definition

2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved.

1122

Job Evaluation Methods: Point Method


A quantitative technique that involves:
 Identifying the degree to which each compensable

factor is present in the job.


 Awarding points for each degree of each factor.
 Calculating a total point value for the job by adding

up the corresponding points for each factor.


This is a summary chart of the key grade level criteria for the GS-7 level of clerical and assistance
work. Do not use this chart alone for classification purposes; additional grade level criteria are in the
Web-based chart.

Source: www.opm.gov/fedclass/gscler.pdf. Accessed May 18, 2007.


2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved.

1123

2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved.

1124

Establishing Pay Rates (contd)

Establishing Pay Rates (contd)


Step 4. Price Each Pay Grade
GradeWage Curve
 Shows the pay rates paid for jobs in each pay grade,

relative to the points or rankings assigned to each


job or grade by the job evaluation.

Point Method
Step 3. Group
Similar Jobs
into Pay Grades

 Shows the relationships between the value of the job

Ranking Method

as determined by one of the job evaluation methods


and the current average pay rates for your grades.

Classification Methods

2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved.

1125

FIGURE 115
Plotting a
Wage Curve

2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved.

1126

Establishing Pay Rates (contd)


Step 5. FineFine-Tune Pay Rates
 Developing pay ranges


Flexibility in meeting external job market rates.

Easier for employees to move into higher pay grades.

Allows for rewarding performance differences and seniority.

 Correcting outout-of
of--line rates

2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved.

1127

FIGURE 116
Wage Structure

Raising underpaid jobs to the minimum of the rate range for


their pay grade.

Freezing rates or cutting pay rates for overpaid (red circle)


jobs to maximum in the pay range for their pay grade.

2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved.

TABLE 114

1128

Federal Government Pay Schedule: Grades GS-8, GS-9, GS-10,


GS-11 for Dallas-Fort Worth, Texas

EFFECTIVE JANUARY 2007


Annual Rates by Grade and Step

2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved.

1129

GS-8

41,246

42,621

43,997

45,372

46,747

48,122

49,498

50,873

52,248

GS-9

45,556

47,074

48,593

50,111

51,630

53,148

54,666

56,185

57,703

59,221

GS-10

50,169

51,841

53,513

55,185

56,857

58,529

60,201

61,873

63,545

65,218

GS-11

55,119

56,957

58,794

60,632

62,469

64,307

66,145

67,982

69,820

71,657

Source: http://opm.gov/oca/07tables/pdf/DFW.pdf. Accessed May 18, 2007.


2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved.

53,623

1130

FIGURE 117
Compensation
Administration
Checklist

Pricing Managerial and Professional Jobs


Compensating Executives
and Managers

Base
Pay

Source: Reprinted from www.HR.BLR.com


with permission of the publisher Business
and Legal Reports Inc., 141 Mill Rock
Road East, Old Saybrook, CT 2004.
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved.

1131

Short-term
Incentives

Long-Term
Incentives

Executive
Benefits and
Perks

2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved.

1132

Pricing Managerial and Professional Jobs

Compensating Professional Employees

What Really Determines Executive Pay?

Employers can use job evaluation for


professional jobs.

 CEO pay is set by the board of directors taking into

account factors such as the business strategy,


corporate trends, and where they want to be in the
short and long term.
 Firms pay CEOs based on the complexity of the jobs

they filled.
 Boards are reducing the relative importance of base

salary while boosting the emphasis on performanceperformancebased pay.

2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved.

1133

Competency--Based Pay
Competency

Compensable factors focus on problem solving,


creativity, job scope, and technical knowledge
and expertise.
Firms use the point method and factor
comparison methods, although job classification
seems most popular.
Professional jobs are marketmarket-priced to establish
the values for benchmark jobs.
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved.

1134

Competency--Based Pay (contd)


Competency

Competencies
 Demonstrable characteristics of a person, including

Why Use CompetencyBased Pay?

knowledge, skills, and behaviors, that enable


performance.

What is CompetencyCompetency-Based Pay?


 Paying for the employees range, depth, and types of

skills and knowledge, rather than for the job title he


or she holds.

2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved.

Support HighPerformance
Work Systems

1135

2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved.

Support
Strategic Aims

Support
Performance
Management

1136

Competency--Based Pay in Practice


Competency

Competency--Based Pay: Pros and Cons


Competency

Main elements of skill/competency/knowledge


skill/competency/knowledge
based pay programs:

Pros

1. A system that defines specific skills, and a process

for tying the persons pay to his or her skill.

 Higher quality
 Lower absenteeism
 Fewer accidents

2. A training system that lets employees seek and

Cons

acquire skills.
3. A formal competency testing system.

 Pay program implementation problems

4. A work design that lets employees move among

 Costs of paying for unused knowledge, skills, and

behaviors

jobs to permit work assignment flexibility.

 Complexity of program
 Uncertainty that the program improves productivity
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved.

1137

2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved.

1138

FIGURE 118
Broadbanded
Structure and
How It Relates
to Traditional
Pay Grades
and Ranges

Other Compensation Trends


Broadbanding
 Consolidating salary grades and ranges into just a

few wide levels or bands, each of which contains a


relatively wide range of jobs and salary levels.
 Pro and Cons


More flexibility in assigning workers to different job grades.

Provides support for flatter hierarchies and teams.

Promotes skills learning and mobility.

Lack of permanence in job responsibilities can be unsettling


to new employees.

2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved.

1139

2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved.

Other Compensation Trends (contd)

The Pay Gap

Comparable Worth

Factors Lowering the Earnings of Women:

 Refers to the requirement to pay men and women

1140

 Womens starting salaries are traditionally lower.

equal wages for dissimilar jobs that are of


comparable (rather than strictly equal) value to the
employer.

 Salary increases for women in professional jobs do

not reflect their aboveabove-average performance.


 In whitewhite-collar jobs, men change jobs more

 Seeks to address the issue that women have jobs

that are dissimilar to those of men and those jobs are


often consistently valued less than mens jobs.

frequently, enabling them to be promoted to higherhigherlevel jobs over women with more seniority.
 In blueblue-collar jobs, women tend to be placed in

departments with lowerlower-paying jobs.

2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved.

1141

2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved.

1142

Board Oversight of Executive Pay

Improving Productivity Through HRIS:


Automating Compensation Administration

Factors Influencing Executive Compensation


 FASB requirements for expensing of stock options at

fair market value.

Benefits of Compensation Automation:


 Allows for quick updating of compensation programs.

 Increased SEC reporting requirements for

 Eliminates costs of formerly manual processes.

compensation--related information.
compensation

 Coordinates centralized compensation budgets to

 Increased executive liability for accuracy in corporate

prevent overages in compensation and raises.

financial reporting under the Sarbanes Oxley Act.


 Shareholder activism protesting excessive executive

 Can integrate and automatically administer other pay

compensation due to lack of independence by


executive board compensation committees.

2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved.

actions.

1143

2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved.

1144

KEY TERMS
employee compensation
direct financial payments
indirect financial payments
Davis--Bacon Act (1931)
Davis
Walsh--Healey Public Contract Act
Walsh
(1936)
Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act
Fair Labor Standards Act (1938)
Equal Pay Act (1963)
Employee Retirement Income
Security Act (ERISA)
salary compression
salary survey
benchmark job
job evaluation

compensable factor
ranking method
job classification (or grading) method
classes
grades
grade definition
point method
factor comparison method
pay grade
wage curve
pay ranges
competency--based pay
competency
competencies
broadbanding
comparable worth

2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved.

1145

Human Resource
Management
ELEVENTH EDITION

GARY DESSLER

Part 4 | Compensation

Appendix for Chapter 11

Quantitative Job Evaluation Methods


2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.
All rights reserved.

FIGURE 11A1

Quantitative Job Evaluation Methods

PowerPoint Presentation by Charlie Cook


The University of West Alabama

Sample Definitions of Five Factors Typically Used in Factor Comparison Method

1. Mental Requirements

Factor Comparison Job Evaluation Method

Either the possession of and/or the active application of the following:


A. (inherent) Mental traits, such as intelligence, memory, reasoning, facility in verbal expression,
ability to get along with people, and imagination.
B. (acquired) General education, such as grammar and arithmetic; or general information as to sports, world
events, etc.
C. (acquired) Specialized knowledge such as chemistry, engineering, accounting, advertising, etc.

Step 1. Obtain job information


Step 2. Select key benchmark jobs

2. Skill Requirements

Step 3. Rank key jobs by factor

A. (acquired) Facility in muscular coordination, as in operating machines, repetitive movements, careful


coordinations, dexterity, assembling, sorting, etc.
B. (acquired) Specific job knowledge necessary to the muscular coordination only; acquired by
performance of the work and not to be confused with general education or specialized knowledge.
It is very largely training in the interpretation of sensory impressions.
Examples
1. In operating an adding machine, the knowledge of which key to depress for a subtotal would be skill.
2. In automobile repair, the ability to determine the significance of a knock in the motor would be skill.
3. In hand-firing a boiler, the ability to determine from the appearance of the firebed how coal should be
shoveled over the surface would be skill.

Step 4. Distribute wage rates by factors


Step 5. Rank key jobs according to wages
assigned to each factor
Step 6. Compare the two sets of rankings to
screen out unusable key jobs

3. Physical Requirements

Step 7. Construct the jobjob-comparison scale

A. Physical effort, such as sitting, standing, walking, climbing, pulling, lifting, etc.; both the amount
exercised and the degree of the continuity should be taken into account.
B. Physical status, such as age, height, weight, sex, strength, and eyesight.

Step 8. Use the jobjob-comparison scale


2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved.

1147

Source: Jay L. Otis and Richard H. Leukart, Job Evaluation: A Basis for Sound Wage Administration,
p. 181. 1954, revised 1983. Reprinted by permission of Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved.

1148

FIGURE 11A1

Sample Definitions of Five Factors Typically Used in Factor Comparison Method (contd)

TABLE 11A1

Ranking Key Jobs by Factors1

4. Responsibilities
A.
B.
C.
D.
E.
F.
1.

For raw materials, processed materials, tools, equipment, and property.


For money or negotiable securities.
For profits or loss, savings or methods improvement.
For public contact.
For records.
For supervision.
Primarily the complexity of supervision given to subordinates; the number of subordinates is a secondary
feature. Planning, direction, coordination, instruction, control, and approval characterize this kind of supervision.
2. Also, the degree of supervision received. If Jobs A and B gave no supervision to subordinates,
but A received much closer immediate supervision than B, then B would be entitled to a higher rating than A in
the supervision factor.
To summarize the four degrees of supervision:
Highest degreegives muchgets little
High degreegives muchgets much
Low degreegives nonegets little
Lowest degreegives nonegets much

Mental
Requirements

Physical
Requirements

Skill
Requirements

Responsibility

Welder

Crane operator

Working
Conditions

Punch press operator

Security guard

11

is high, 4 is low.

5. Working Conditions
A. Environmental influences such as atmosphere, ventilation, illumination, noise, congestion,
fellow workers, etc.
B. Hazardsfrom the work or its surroundings.
C. Hours.

Source: Jay L. Otis and Richard H. Leukart, Job Evaluation: A Basis for Sound Wage Administration,
p. 181. 1954, revised 1983. Reprinted by permission of Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved.

TABLE 11A2

1149

Ranking Key Jobs by Wage Rates1

Welder

TABLE 11A3

Requirements

Hourly
Wage

Mental

Physical

Skill

Responsibility

Working
Conditions

$9.80

4.00(1)

0.40(4)

3.00(1)

2.00(1)

0.40(2)

Crane operator

$5.60

1.40(3)

2.00(1)

1.80(3)

0.20(4)

0.20(4)

Punch press operator

$6.00

1.60(2)

1.30(3)

2.00(2)

0.80(2)

0.30(3)

Security guard

11

$4.00

1.20(4)

1.40(2)

2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved.

0.40(4)

0.40(3)

0.60(1)

1150

Comparison of Factor and Wage Rankings

Mental
Requirements

Physical
Requirements

Skill
Requirements

Responsibility

Working
Conditions

A1

$2

A1

$2

A1

$2

A1

$2

A1

Welder

$2
2

Crane operator

is high, 4 is low.

2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved.

TABLE 11A4

1151

Job (Factor) Comparison Scale

Mental Requirements

Physical Requirements

Skill Requirements

0.20

Working Conditions

Crane Operator

Crane Operator

Sec. Guard

1Amount

of each factor based on step 3.

2Ratings

based on distribution of wages to each factor from step 5.

2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved.

1152

Step 1. Determine clusters of jobs to be


evaluated

Punch Press Operator


Welder

Security guard

The Point Method of Job Evaluation


Responsibility

0.30
0.40

Punch press operator

Sec. Guard

Welder

0.50
0.60

Sec. Guard

0.70
0.80

Punch Press Operator

Step 2. Collect job information

0.90
1.00

(Plater)

1.10
1.20
1.30
1.40

Step 3. Select compensable factors

Sec. Guard
Punch Press Operator
Crane Operator

1.50

Sec. Guard

(Inspector)

(Plater)

(Inspector)

1.60

Punch Press Operator

1.70

(Plater)

1.80

(Inspector)

Crane Operator

(Inspector)

Punch Press Operator

Welder

Step 4. Define compensable factors


Step 5. Define factor degrees

1.90
2.00

Crane Operator

2.20
2.40

(Plater)
(Inspector)

(Plater)

Step 6. Determine relative values of factors

2.60
2.80
3.00

Welder

3.20
3.40
3.60
3.80
4.00

Welder

2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved.

1153

2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved.

1154

FIGURE 11A2
Example of
One Factor
(Complexity/
Problem
Solving) in
a Point Factor
System

TABLE 11A5

Source: Richard W.
Beatty and James R.
Beatty, Job Evaluation,
in Ronald A. Berk (ed.),
Performance
Assessment: Methods
and Applications
(Baltimore, MD: Johns
Hopkins University
Press, 1986), p. 322.

Evaluation Points Assigned to Factors and Degrees

FirstDegree
Points

SecondDegree
Points

ThirdDegree
Points

FourthDegree
Points

FifthDegree
Points

Decision making

41

82

123

164

204

Problem solving

35

70

105

140

174

Knowledge

24

48

72

96

123

Reprinted by
permission.

2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved.

1155

2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved.

1156

10

Você também pode gostar