Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
INTRODUCTION
Differentiated thyroid cancers (DTC) in general have
very good prognosis, and the overall long-term survival
rate of patients with DTC is more than 90%, with variations among subsets of patients.1 Traditionally, the measure of primary outcome in cancer has been survival time.
But it is increasingly recognized that the diagnosis and
management of cancer can have a major impact on every
aspect of a patients quality of life (QOL) and that measuring these changes is important. In addition to mortality, cancer can cause significant morbidity not only from
the disease but also from the treatment. We believe this is
especially so in DTC, which tends to affect young patients
in the prime of their lives.
There have been relatively few health-related
(HR)QOL studies looking specifically into thyroid cancer
and none in an urban multi-ethnic Asian population. We
sought to address this gap in the literature, and therefore
the aim of this study was to determine QOL in DTC
survivors in Singapore and compare this with national
norms of QOL using the Short Form 36 Health Survey
(SF-36).
507
Instruments
The definition of HRQOL is the extent to which ones usual
or expected physical, emotional, and social well-being are affected
by a medical condition or its treatment.3
The SF-36 is a generic QOL instrument. This comprehensive short-form instrument with 36 questions can be selfadministered to yield a health profile comprising eight domains:
physical functioning (PF), role limitations caused by physical
problems (RP), bodily pain (BP), general health (GH), vitality
(VT), social functioning (SF), role limitations caused by emotional
problems (RE), and mental health (MH). In Singapore, both English (UK) and Chinese (simplified characters) versions of SF-36
(version 1) were validated in patients with systematic lupus erythematosus by Thumboo et al.4,5 and later in a community-based
population survey of 5,503 Singaporeans.6,7 In these studies, both
language versions of SF-36 showed satisfactory construct validity
and internal consistency reliability.
Statistical Analysis
The SF-36 was used to generate eight domain scores on a
scale ranging from 0 to 100.8 Mean SF-36 scores for the study
sample were compared with their population norms using onesample t tests. To calculate the population norms for SF-36
scores, the distributions of age, sex, race, and survey language
(English vs. Chinese) of our study sample were described and
used as weights to calculate weighted mean SF-36 scores for a
representative sample of the Singaporean general population
whose SF-36 scores were obtained from a previous study.7 The
weighted mean scores represented the functioning and well-being
levels for a healthy population that was the same as our study
sample in terms of age, sex, race, and language, thus serving as
adjusted population norms for characterizing the reductions in
QOL of our patients. Cohens effect size9 was calculated to evaluate the magnitude of reduction in QOL for the patients. The
effect size was the difference between patients mean scores and
adjusted population norms divided by the SD of patients SF-36
scores. An effect size of 0.2, 0.5, and 0.8 indicate small, moderate,
and large differences, respectively.
To identify the determinants of QOL, we first examined the
effects of patients characteristics on each SF-36 scale using univariate analysis of variance tests and then included those significant variables (defined as a P value of less than .05) in multiple
linear regression models, one for each SF-36 scale. Patients characteristics examined included sex, age, race, educational level,
working status, language used when answering the questionnaire, time since diagnosis, number of surgeries, hoarse voice
more than 6 months, long-term calcium supplementation, the
number of times patient underwent surgery or radio-iodine treatments, and the number of days spent on medical appointments in
the previous year. All statistical analyses were performed using
SAS for Windows (version 9.1, Cary, NC) with all tests being
two-tailed and significance level being .05.
RESULTS
Patient Characteristics
Of the 290 in the targeted study sample, 152 patients
mailed back completed questionnaires, representing a response rate of 52.4%. Compared with respondents, nonrespondents were older (mean age, 61 vs. 47 yr, P .01) and
were more likely to be ethnic Malays (18.2% vs. 7.2%, P
.05). Eight patients were removed from the statistical
analysis because of incomplete responses in their questionnaires. The demographic characteristics of the 144
patients are shown in Table I. The mean (SD) age was 47.8
Laryngoscope 117: March 2007
508
TABLE I.
Sociodemographic Characteristics of Respondents.
n (%)
Female sex
Marital status
Married
Single/divorced/widowed
Education
06 years
712 years
12 years
Unknown
Employment status
Working (full time or part time)
Unemployed/retired
Race
Chinese
Malay
Indian
107 (74.3)
117 (81.3)
27 (18.7)
43 (29.9)
72 (50.0)
26 (18.0)
3 (2.1)
77 (53.8)
67 (46.2)
123 (85.4)
10 (6.9)
11 (7.6)
(13.7) years, with a range of 18 to 82 years. Of the respondents, 26.3% were male, 51.2% had 7 to 12 years of formal
education, 81.3% were married, and 53.8% were working.
Quality of Life
SF-36 scores of the study population versus the general Singaporean population (adjusted for age, sex, race,
and survey language) are shown in Table II. There was a
statistically significant decrease in SF-36 scores between
thyroid cancer survivors and the general population in all
domains except for SF.
The results of multiple linear regression are as
shown in Table III. PF was worse in those survivors who
were aged 50 years or older. MH scores were better in
those who had more than 12 years of formal education.
Being employed had a positive influence on RP and RE
scores. Compared with Chinese, ethnic Malay/Indian had
lower scores in BP, SF, RE, and MH domains. Patients
who underwent two or more surgeries reported significantly better RE scores. Eleven percent of the respondents
had stopped thyroxine in the 6 weeks before the study. We
would expect the SF-36 scores for these patients would be
lower because of the symptoms of hypothyroidism.10,11
However, this was not seen in our study population.
Tan et al.: Quality of Life in Thyroid Cancer Survivors
TABLE II.
Quality of Life in Surviving Subjects With Differentiated Thyroid Carcinoma.
Subjects (n 144)
SF-36 Scale
Mean
Standard Deviation
Mean for
Normal
Population*
Physical functioning
Role physical
Bodily pain
General health
Vitality
Social functioning
Role emotional
Mental health
76.3
70.7
74.3
61.0
57.1
78.7
70.1
67.3
25.6
40.0
26.6
24.4
21.3
24.1
41.5
20.2
82.1
83.5
79.9
68.3
63.5
75.2
80.2
71.8
Difference
Effect Size
P Value
5.8
12.8
5.6
7.3
6.4
3.6
10.0
4.5
0.23
0.32
0.21
0.30
0.30
0.15
0.24
0.22
.007
.001
.012
.001
.001
.077
.004
.009
DISCUSSION
Well-differentiated thyroid cancer is associated with
relative survival rates exceeding 90%. The QOL studies in
thyroid cancer have not been well studied, especially in
the Asian population. Using SF-36, we have shown that
there is a decrease in all the domains of the SF-36 except
for SF in thyroid cancer survivors compared with the
general population. The magnitude of those observed decreases was small, although statistical significance was
reached for a given P value of .05.
In our study, the effect size for PF, RP, GH, VT and
SF scales were small, with a range of 0.22 to 0.30, whereas
the remaining scales of BP, RE, and MH had effect sizes
less than 0.2. The latter finding is similar to data from the
Medicare Health Outcomes Survey.12 The effect size varied with the type of cancer and was significantly increased
when comparing patients who were currently under treatment for cancer.
We have shown that the morbidity of thyroid cancer
and its treatment does lead to a decrease in PF in survivors, especially in those above the age of 50. After taking
into account the comorbidity in the older group of patients,
TABLE III.
Regression Coefficients of Factors Influencing Quality of Life in Survivors With Differentiated Thyroid Cancer.
PF
10.0
15.1*
10.5
6.3
RP
11.0
16.8*
BP
9.4
8.9
30.0
GH
7.1
6.2
VT
6.2
6.3
SF
RE
7.9*
12.5*
MH
9.3*
23.1
38.2
16.6
18.8
13.1
16.1
14.2*
29.4
15.7*
22.0
0.29
0.27
0.24
0.15
0.13
0.13
0.16
20.9
8.2*
0.18
Only factors that were statistically significant in univariate analysis of variance tests were included in these multiple regression models (one for each SF-36 scale).
*P .05; P .01; P .001.
Compared with Chinese.
PF physical functioning; RP role physical; BP bodily pain; GH general health; VT vitality; SF social functioning; RE role emotional; MH
mental health; R2 coefficient of determination.
509
CONCLUSION
DTC patients are often told of the excellent prognosis, with most patients having near normal life expectancy. However, patients experience the life-long stress of
the diagnosis of cancer.14 Our study and others in the
literature have clearly shown that there is a significant
decrease in the QOL in these patients. These issues need
to be addressed by health care providers.
Our study also indicates that among thyroid cancer
survivors, the elderly and the poorer educated need more
attention with regard to follow-up and education. Clearly,
510
the goal of returning to work benefits this group of patients and should be encouraged to improve their QOL.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
1. Gilliland FD, Hunt WC, Morris DM, Key CR. Prognostic
factors for thyroid carcinoma. A population-based study of
15,698 cases from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End
Results (SEER) program 19731991. Cancer 1997;1:79:
564 573.
2. Dilman DA. Mail and Telephone Surveys: The Total Design
Method. New York: Wiley, 1997.
3. Cella DF. Measuring quality of life in palliative care. Semin
Oncol 1995;22:73 81.
4. Thumboo J, Fong KY, Ng TP, et al. Validation of the MOS SF
36 for quality of life assessment of systemic lupus erythematosus patients in Singapore. J Rheumatol 1999;26:
97102.
5. Thumboo J, Feng PH, Soh CH, et al. Validation of the Chinese SF-36 for quality of life assessment in patients with
systemic lupus erythematosus. Lupus 2000;9:708 712.
6. Thumboo J, Fong KY, Machin D, et al. A community-based
study of scaling assumptions and construct validity of the
English (UK) and Chinese (HK) SF-36 in Singapore. Qual
Life Res 2001;10:175188.
7. Thumboo J, Chan SP, Machin D, et al. Measuring healthrelated quality of life in Singapore: normal values for the
English and Chinese SF-36 Health Survey. Ann Acad Med
Singapore 2002;31:366 374.
8. Ware JE, Snow KK, Korinski M. SF-36 Health Survey: Manual and Interpretation Guide. Lincoln, RI: QualityMetric,
Incorporated, 2000.
9. Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd ed. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1988.
10. Mendoza A, Shaffer B, Karakla D, et al. Quality of life with
well-differentiated thyroid cancer: treatment toxicities and
their reduction. Thyroid 2004;14:133140.
11. Botella-Carretero JI, Galan JM, Caballero C, et al. Quality of
life and psychometric functionality in patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma. Endocr Relat Cancer 2003;10:
601 610.
12. Baker F, Haffer SC, Denniston M. Health-related quality of
life of cancer and noncancer patients in Medicare managed
care. Cancer 2003;1:97:674 681.
13. Tagay S, Herpertz S, Langkafel M, et al. Health-related quality of life, anxiety and depression in thyroid cancer patients under short-term hypothyroidism and TSHsuppressive levothyroxine treatment. Eur J Endocrinol
2005;153:755763.
14. Dow KH, Ferrell BR, Anello C. Balancing demands of cancer
surveillance among survivors of thyroid cancer. Cancer
Pract 1997;5:289 925.