Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Course
Design
Professor Mary Beth W. Goodrich, CPA, CIA, CISA
Term Fall 2006
Meetings Thursdays: 7:00p.m. – 9:45p.m.
Class Location: SM 2.106
The topics to be covered and schedule for class meetings is subject to change at the instructor’s
discretion. Changes will be announced in class and/or will be posted on webCT. It is a good idea to
check webCT frequently (I recommend daily, but at least 3-4 times per week). It is your
responsibility to keep up with what is expected of you.
Team Submission #1
due 9/28/06
8 10/5 Acquisition / Payment Process Chapter 12 – The
Purchasing Process
Part A: Purchases
Part B: Accounts Payable / Cash Chapter 13 – The
Disbursements Process Accounts Payable /
Cash Disbursements
(AP / CD) Process
9 10/12 Acquisition / Payment Process (cont.) Chapter 14 – The
Human Resources
Part C: Human Resources Business (HR) Management
Processes and Payroll, Fixed Assets, and Payroll
Financing Processes
Module 3
10 11/2 The Conversion (or Production) Cycle Chapter 15 –
Integrated Production
Processes (IPP)
11 11/2 E-Business Chapter 3 –
Electronic Business
(E-Business)
Systems
These descriptions and timelines are subject to change at the discretion of the
Professor.
Class Format
I believe that you will learn more in a facilitated learning environment. What does this mean?
Your active participation in discussions will enable you to learn and retain more of the
information. I see myself as the facilitator of your learning experience. It is up to you the
degree to which you choose to learn. I have one set of experiences. All of us have different
experiences that can add to the discussion. If you have a question, please ask it. Chances are
you are not the only one with the question. When you share, we all learn. If you have any
questions at all on the material, bring it up in class or talk with me.
Points
Team Project (1 interim submission worth 200
100 pts, and final paper worth 100 points)
0 (or – or + points)
Teaming Evaluation Points
Test #1 100
Test #2 100
Cumulative Final Exam 100
Grading TOTAL POINTS 500
(credit)
Criteria
Grading criteria
These are closed book and notes. You may expect exams to cover
any material from class discussions, presentations, the text, homework
assignments, and any notes on webCT or handed out. Exams may
consist of multiple-choice, essay, short answer or problems. You may
be required to present a UTD student identification card or driver’s
Exams license at any examination.
I will have a short review of what will be covered on the exams in a
class before the exam. If you are not in class, I will not review this
information with you individually. This review is just one of the perks of
coming to class.
If you have a valid reason to miss an exam, you must get in touch with
me within a reasonably sufficient time BEFORE the exam (in person,
through webCT e-mail or via phone) in order to be granted a make-up.
I get to determine whether you provided reasonable time to me and
have a valid reason to miss the exam. For personal illness, I require a
Make-up signed, physician’s excuse. With a valid, PRE-APPROVED excuse, a
Exams make-up will be granted.
Team Project There will be a team project. There will be one (1) graded interim
submission and the final project paper due towards the end of the
semester. Emphasis will be on case study of an accounting
information system and applying concepts and information learned in
class to analyze and make design recommendations on an existing
accounting information system. A Team Project Case Study Outline is
provided (Appendix A of Syllabus). Teams that do not follow the
outline because it does not apply to them or they want to do something
different must get approval from the instructor BEFORE the interim
submission and/or Final Team Project is turned in. Please refer to the
Team Project Case Study Outline for more details and read it
thoroughly several times.
The thing to remember is: 0 (zero) is a good score on this and
means that you put forth a full effort! Each individual must turn in a
Teaming Evaluation Form when the Final Team Project is turned in
through webCT assignment functionality. Details on the Teaming
Evaluation Form can be found in Appendix A of the Syllabus.
The form MUST be completed on you and all your team members
Teaming and should include effort on ALL group work. This form MUST be
Evaluation typed and you must provide responses to all required information or
Points points will be deducted from your Teaming Evaluation Form score.
Late Work Please see policies as related to exams, team project, teaming
evaluation forms, and other under those respective areas.
There will be several self-quizzes available for you to take. These are
not graded. However, they must be taken by the due dates provided
On-line Self and will close up after the due date. These are optional, but good to
Quizzes take as some questions from the quizzes will be similar to ones you
may see on the exams and give you an idea on whether you are
grasping the content.
Grade If you believe there is an error on any grade, you are to let the
Contests / Instructor and Teaching Assistant know in writing (via webCT e-mail)
Grade what you believe may be in error and why you believe it is wrong. This
A student at the university neither loses the rights nor escapes the
responsibilities of citizenship. He or she is expected to obey federal,
state, and local laws as well as the Regents’ Rules, university
regulations, and administrative rules. Students are subject to discipline
for violating the standards of conduct whether such conduct takes
place on or off campus, or whether civil or criminal penalties are also
imposed for such conduct.
The faculty expects from its students a high level of responsibility and
academic honesty. Because the value of an academic degree
depends upon the absolute integrity of the work done by the student
for that degree, it is imperative that a student demonstrate a high
standard of individual honor in his or her scholastic work.
Academic
Integrity Scholastic dishonesty includes, but is not limited to, statements, acts or
omissions related to applications for enrollment or the award of a
degree, and/or the submission as one’s own work or material that is
not one’s own. As a general rule, scholastic dishonesty involves one
of the following acts: cheating, plagiarism, collusion and/or falsifying
academic records. Students suspected of academic dishonesty are
subject to disciplinary proceedings.
Essentially, the law requires that colleges and universities make those
Disability reasonable adjustments necessary to eliminate discrimination on the
Services basis of disability. For example, it may be necessary to remove
classroom prohibitions against tape recorders or animals (in the case
of dog guides) for students who are blind. Occasionally an assignment
requirement may be substituted (for example, a research paper versus
an oral presentation for a student who is hearing impaired). Classes
enrolled students with mobility impairments may have to be
rescheduled in accessible facilities. The college or university may
need to provide special services such as registration, note-taking, or
mobility assistance.
You need to turn in your team name, the company you want to review, and the project
focus. You must submit all the detail I need by the date in the TOPICS AND SCHEDULE
part of the syllabus or you can get up to –10 points on the project.
Think about companies that you work with and a key business process that feeds the
accounting information system (AIS) such as (sales / collection (order to cash),
acquisition / payment (purchase to pay), human resources (hire to paycheck), or
conversion (such as the production of finished goods) or an accounting process such as
consolidations, month-end or year-end closing, cost accounting, etc.
Using any company of your choice – either one that uses SAP R/3 or some other
enterprise system (such as Oracle, PeopleSoft or Baan) or one that could possibly
benefit from an enterprise resource planning / enterprise system, e-Business concepts,
and/or additional focus on internal control.
Complete the following:
· Sections in blue must be turned in for the Team Submission #1 for a grade and all
sections can be turned in with Team Submission #1 for “freebie” feedback (and
also to give you a leg up on the end of semester “crunch”).
· All sections must be turned in for Team Submission #2 including all modifications
recommended from Team Submission #1.
· Have the information for both submissions in one Word document or points will
be taken off.
1. PLANNING STAGE (30 points total) - Give a brief history of the company (you are
completing this case on) include the following:
a. History (5 points)
b. Current key business processes and accounting transactions (5 points)
c. Explain all the systems that the company uses in conjunction with the
accounting information system (feeds to the accounting system) and how
these systems are used for decision-making and how they support the
business processes. (5 points)
d. List and prioritize all information systems needs – criticality of systems
that need to be improved (3 points).
e. Explain pervasive internal control (Using the COSO framework) explain
internal control at the company level. Explain it as it relates to the 5
components of control and explain the key pervasive controls. (Consult
Chapter 7 and Document posted on COSO Components of Control ) (5
points)
f. Explain the pervasive internal control from an IT perspective (Using the
COBiT framework). How is the IT organization structured, etc. at the
company level? Give sufficient detail for your analysis (Consult Chapter 8)
(5 points)
g. Give your overall company assessment of internal control at a high level. (2
points)
NOTE: If your team would like to do a slightly different project, please write up a Case
Study similar to this one for my review and approval. Or for a minor change, for
example, instead of doing a business process, one team did the month-end accounting
close process for an organization because they were experiencing significant problems
with that you can e-mail me with the suggested project modification.
Have fun with the subject matter and be creative – with analyzing systems and
processes, it is essential to be creative in order to facilitate valuable changes and not
just “pave the cow paths”.
The below teaming evaluation form must be completed and submitted by the due date
and time as specified in the Syllabus (the same form will be attached in the Assignments
area of the course). In addition to losing points for late submission, points could be
Late submission points for late teaming evaluation forms will be deducted as follows:
Late by one day = -5 points
Late by two days = -10 points
Late by three days = -20 points
Late by four or more days = -30 points
My Name
Team Name
(List Team Members in alphabetical order of last names, including yourself).
Score:
Above and beyond – A+ - went above and beyond in some way and deserves a score higher than the majority of the
team (explain why they deserve above and beyond status)
Full contributor – A - should get all the team points because they gave a fair effort (explain why they are a full
contributor)
Less than full - If less than a full contributor, say whether they gave a B, C, D or F effort and you give support for
why you scored them there - why they were not a full contributor.
Ranking: Rank each team member from 1 to X with 1 being overall the best team member (you MUST rank
yourself). Note: no person can have the same number!
Team Member’s Name Score of Team Ranking
Member
Team Member #1
Team Member #2
Team Member #3
Team Member #4
Team Member #5
Explain the SPECIFIC work (i.e. sections of the paper) that each person did on the project and the
strengths of each team member, INCLUDING you.
What would YOU do to improve YOUR work and what could the TEAM have done better?