Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Legionella Viability
Sverine Allegra, Franoise Berger, Philippe Berthelot,
Florence Grattard, Bruno Pozzetto and Serge Riffard
Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2008, 74(24):7813. DOI:
10.1128/AEM.01364-08.
Published Ahead of Print 10 October 2008.
These include:
REFERENCES
CONTENT ALERTS
Legionella viability was monitored during heat shock treatment at 70C by a flow cytometric assay (FCA).
After 30 min of treatment, for 6 of the 12 strains tested, the FCA still detected 10 to 25% of cells that were viable
but nonculturable (VBNC). These VBNC cells were able to produce ATP and to be resuscitated after culture
on amoebae.
7814
ALLEGRA ET AL.
and by their ability to be resuscitated after intracellular multiplication in Acanthamoeba polyphaga (13). Under various
stress conditions, many bacteria are able to enter a state where
they are no longer culturable on standard media but still main-
FIG. 2. Evaluation of the characteristics of a suspension of L. pneumophila sg 1 PHB before (0 min) and 10 and 60 min after a heat shock
treatment at 70C. Cells were evaluated by an FCA (A), solid culture on BCYE with 0.1% -ketoglutarate (B), ATP production (C), and solid
culture on BCYE with 0.1% -ketoglutarate after resuscitation on amoebae (D). Representative results (A, B, and D) or means standard errors
(C) from four independent experiments are shown. RLU, relative light units; SE, standard errors.
FIG. 1. Kinetic analysis by FCA of Legionella extermination after heat shock treatment. A 3-day culture of L. pneumophila sg 1 on BCYE with 0.1%
-ketoglutarate was subjected to a heat shock at 70C from 0 to 60 min. The bacteria were visualized on a dot plot of PI red fluorescence (FL3) versus
Syto 9 green fluorescence (FL1). The P1 region corresponds to dead cells. Syto 9-stained bacteria with intact membranes were used to delineate the P2 region
(viable, culturable cells). The P3 region (VBNC cells) corresponds to bacteria in an intermediate state with compromised membranes (see the text).
7815
REFERENCES
1. AFNOR. 1993. Testing water-detection and enumeration of Legionella spp.
and Legionella pneumophilageneral method by direct culture and membrane filtration. French standard AFNOR NF T90-431. Association Francaise de Normalisation, Paris, France.
2. Alonso, J. L., S. Mascellaro, Y. Moreno, M. A. Ferrus, and J. Hernandez.
2002. Double-staining method for differentiation of morphological changes
and membrane integrity of Campylobacter coli cells. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 68:51515154.
3. Armisen, T. G., and P. Servais. 2004. Combining direct viable count (DVC)
and fluorescent in situ hybridisation (FISH) to enumerate viable E. coli in
rivers and wastewaters. Water Sci. Technol. 50:271275.
4. Atlas, R. M. 1999. Legionella: from environmental habitats to disease pathology, detection and control. Environ. Microbiol. 1:283293.
5. Barer, M. R., and C. R. Harwood. 1999. Bacterial viability and culturability.
Adv. Microb. Physiol. 41:93137.
6. Berney, M., F. Hammes, F. Bosshard, H. U. Weilenmann, and T. Egli. 2007.
Assessment and interpretation of bacterial viability by using the LIVE/
DEAD BacLight kit in combination with flow cytometry. Appl. Environ.
Microbiol. 73:32833290.
7. Bjergbaek, L. A., and P. Roslev. 2005. Formation of nonculturable Escherichia coli in drinking water. J. Appl. Microbiol. 99:10901098.
8. Boccia, S., P. Laurenti, P. Borella, U. Moscato, G. Capalbo, A. Cambieri, R.
Amore, G. Quaranta, F. Boninti, M. Orsini, G. Branca, G. Fadda, V. Romano-Spica, and G. Ricciardi. 2006. Prospective 3-year surveillance for
nosocomial and environmental Legionella pneumophila: implications for infection control. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 27:459465.
9. Boulos, L., M. Prevost, B. Barbeau, J. Coallier, and R. Desjardins. 1999.
LIVE/DEAD BacLight: application of a new rapid staining method for
direct enumeration of viable and total bacteria in drinking water. J. Microbiol. Methods 37:7786.
10. DGS. 22 April 2002. Circulaire DGS/SD7A/SD5C/DHOS/E4 no. 2002/243
du 22 avril 2002 relative `a la prevention du risque lie aux legionelles dans les
etablissements de sante, p. 243. Direction Generale de la Sante, Paris,
France.
11. Doleans, A., H. Aurell, M. Reyrolle, G. Lina, J. Freney, F. Vandenesch, J.
Etienne, and S. Jarraud. 2004. Clinical and environmental distributions of
Legionella strains in France are different. J. Clin. Microbiol. 42:458460.
12. Fields, B. S., R. F. Benson, and R. E. Besser. 2002. Legionella and Legionnaires disease: 25 years of investigation. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 15:506526.
13. Garca, M. T., S. Jones, C. Pelaz, R. D. Millar, and Y. Abu Kwaik. 2007.
Acanthamoeba polyphaga resuscitates viable non-culturable Legionella pneumophila after disinfection. Environ. Microbiol. 9:12671277.
14. Hoefel, D., W. L. Grooby, P. T. Monis, S. Andrews, and C. P. Saint. 2003.
Enumeration of water-borne bacteria using viability assays and flow cytometry: a comparison to culture-based techniques. J. Microbiol. Methods 55:
585597.
15. Ingram, M., T. J. Cleary, B. J. Price, R. L. Price III, and A. Castro. 1982.
FIG. 3. Resistance patterns of various Legionella strains subjected to a heat shock treatment. After a 3-day culture on BCYE with 0.1%
-ketoglutarate, 12 Legionella strains were subjected to a heat shock treatment at 70C from 0 to 60 min, and FCAs were performed. For each
strain, the result at each time point shown is the percentage of bacteria detected in both the P2 (viable, culturable cells) and P3 (VBNC cells)
regions and is expressed as the mean standard error from two to five independent experiments. Lp1, L. pneumophila sg 1.
7816
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
ALLEGRA ET AL.