Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
CONCORDIA UNIVERSITY
FALL 2013
Gas Dynamics
MECH 6111
Dr. Pierre Q. Gauthier
Scramjets
Prepared by:
6477607
Eusebio Olalde
6708307
2013-12-20
Tabla de contenido
1 Scope ........................................................................................................................... 1
2 Technical Overview ...................................................................................................... 2
2.1 Hypersonic machines ............................................................................................. 3
2.2 Principle of ramjets ................................................................................................ 5
2.3 Scramjets ............................................................................................................... 7
2.3.1 Scramjet fuel injection [7] .................................................................................. 9
2.3.2 Wind tunnel problematic ................................................................................ 11
2.3.3 Fuels .............................................................................................................. 12
2.3.4 Thermal protection systems (TPS) [1] ............................................................. 13
3 International Scramjet Developments......................................................................... 15
3.1 International Chronicle of Scramjet Development ................................................ 15
United States ....................................................................................................... 15
France ................................................................................................................. 16
Russia ................................................................................................................. 17
Germany .............................................................................................................. 18
Japan................................................................................................................... 19
Australia .............................................................................................................. 19
3.2 Recent Scramjet Developments ....................................................................... 22
4 Future Developments ................................................................................................. 24
5 Conclusions and Remarks ......................................................................................... 25
6 References ................................................................................................................. 26
Scramjets
1 Scope
This work deals with an introductory overview of the Supersonic Combustion RAM-jet
(SCRAMjet) for Hypersonic air-breathing propulsion applications, which has been considered the
most promising technology for powering vehicles at high Mach number speeds, since its
establishment as a solution for more efficient hypersonic propulsion during the 1950s [5].
International efforts on Research and Development (R&D) projects of Scramjet are summarized
in order to provide a global picture of the most important contributions to this technology in
different countries. For the last 60 years, hypersonic air-breathing propulsion has been of big
priority to the most important national aerospace programs in the world; the most significant
developments and results of the scramjet projects carried in Russia, USA, Australia, France,
Germany, Japan and England are discussed.
In an air-breathing engine, when flight speeds reach the hypersonic regime, the total pressure
and temperature contained inside are very large, so large that in order to maintain the static
pressures within the structural limits of a suitable mass engine, the working fluid must flow
through the engines core at supersonic speeds. This flow characteristic becomes a problem in
the combustion part of the cycle, for two main reasons [6]:
Flow of air inside the engine is so fast, that even a close to instantaneous reaction like
combustion becomes hard to be completely achieved before the flow leaves the
combustor.
The RAM-jet engine has been utilized in missiles and other hi-speed applications for a long time
now
[7]
, but its operation speed limits have been restricted below the hypersonic regime by the
combustors capability of overcoming these problems when burning fuel at such speeds. The
present work covers mainly the research and developments of the Supersonic Combustion part
of the scramjet engine, such as combustor performance and combustor-inlet interactions.
The present scramjet engines development situation is assessed to give a base ground on the
operation cycle and performance of this hypersonic engine, as well as the critical gaps that still
remain unfilled in order to put the scramjet into operation in the following years.
1
Scramjets
2 Technical Overview
After World War II several countries including the United States, Russia, China, Japan, Australia
among other realize that hypersonic flights were a necessity to achieve better war gear, less
expensive commercial flights and means to bring load to outer space. Since then, there have
been a lot of sole and combined efforts from all these countries to achieve hypersonic propulsion.
However, the list of technical design difficulties related to hypersonic flights is really long, just to
mention some; aerothermodynamics environment, propulsion systems, structure, flight control
systems. Moreover there are decisive factors to consider as weight, complexity, variability,
longevity, cost, handling, stowability, etc.
[1]
addressed in the present work with the most resent research available.
But, what is hypersonic flight? To answer this question, the dimensionless relation known as
Mach number should be presented. It relates the local velocity of the free stream (V) with the
local sonic velocity (a) as,
1.1
The Mach number yields to 4 different speeds of flight, also known as regimes of flight: subsonic
(M<1), transonic (M1), supersonic (M>1) and hypersonic (M>5). To have an idea about the
meaning of the number; speed of sound at sea level is 768 miles per hour or 1,236 kilometers
per hour, thus an hypersonic flight at sea level will require to achieve a speed of at least 3840
miles per hour or 6180 kilometers per hour. As mentioned by H. K. Beckmann Mach number is
like aborigine counting: one, two, three, four, many. Once you reach many, the flow is
hypersonic. [2]
It is possible to see that it is difficult to achieve that speed; furthermore there is a lot of
information that remains unknown or unaware, as presented in the Knowledge Management
Space developed by Matsch and McMasters[1]. The graph is divided into 4 quadrants, each one
representing the level of knowledge available; the first quadrant is information known that we are
aware what we know we know. The second quadrant is information unknown but we are aware
what we know we dont know. The third quadrant is the most dangerous one, the information
that we do not know and we are not aware what we dont know we dont know. This is the main
2
Scramjets
reason a lot of tests developed either on wind tunnels or with actual prototypes result in damage
of equipment, unexpected behavior of the system, wrong data or, as it has happened before, in
lost of lives. And finally the last quadrant is information known but we are not aware what
someone knows, but that we havent found yet. Figure 1.1 shows all 4 quadrants.
Scramjets
spectrum as well as the use of hydrogen as fuel. Also in Table 1.1 a comparison of some
hypersonic applications with the technology related to them is presented.
Scramjets
Mach number
Aerodynamic
technology
Missiles
Maneuvering reentry
vehicles
Global reach
aircraft systems
Space launch
1-6
0-20
0-18
0-25
High lift/drag
ratio
Low drag
Rocket
Propulsion
Ramjet /
Scramjet
Rocket
Fuel
Hydrocarbon
Heat sink
Thermal protection
Ablatives
Radiation cooled
Structure
Low drag
Low drag
Airframe-prop
integration
Airframe-prop integration
Rocket
Rocket
Ramjet / Scramjet
Ramjet / Scramjet
Hydrocarbon
Hydrocarbon
Hydrogen
Hydrogen
Fuel cooled
Radiation cooled
Long life structure
Fuel cooled
Radiation cooled
Low structural weight
fraction
Scramjets
table 1.1, on the section of propulsion, usually the ramjet (scramjet) is not implemented by itself;
rather it is used with a rocket. The reason is that compression depends on velocity and
decreases dramatically with vehicle speed.[3] So, during take-off rocket provides the required
initial acceleration. The operation principle is that air enters to the compression area, an inlet and
a diffuser, after it will go to the combustion chamber, where is mixed with injected fuel and ignited.
The combustion of the oxygen and fuel produces energy, which is transmitted to the gas in form
of high speed expansion, directed to the outer nozzle. The speed of the output air is higher than
the input, thus there will be production of thrust. In comparison with normal turbomachinery,
where air compression is accomplished by means of moving parts, with a speed of Mach 3 or
higher, there is no sustain gain in the pressure efficiency, making machines with changes in
geometry more suitable and efficient for these regimes.
Since its conceptions, according to Ronal S. Fry There are key enabling technologies,
components, or events that had significant impact on the maturation of ramjet propulsion and
engine designs. All these key matters are classified into 10 different sections [6]:
1. High speed aerodynamics analysis: Study of flows with the aid of computational tools as CFD
and the improvement in design tools and techniques.
2. Air induction system technology: Improved designs of fixed and variable geometries,
subsonic, supersonic and dual-flow paths, integration with airframes, mixed cycle flow path
development and improved materials.
3. Combustor technology: Study of fuel mapping and heat transfer distribution, improved
insulators and structural materials and combustion ignition, piloting and flame holding.
4. Ramjet/scramjet fuels: Study of low temperature, high energy and endothermic solid and
liquid fuels.
5. Fuel management systems: Improved injectors, spray distribution, feed systems and
feedback control systems.
6. Propulsion/airframe integration, materials and thermal management: Improved metal alloys,
structures, passive and active cooling devices and fiber reinforced composites.
7. Solid propellant booster technology: Development in tandem, integral rocket-ramjet boosters
and self-boosted ramjet
8. Ejectable and nonejectable technology: Development in inlets, port covers and nozzles.
Scramjets
9. Thermochemical modeling and simulation development: Development in thermochemical
tables, cycle analysis and performance modeling.
10. Ground test methodologies: Improved airflow quality, instrumentation and flight-test
correlation.
2.3 Scramjets
In summary, the ramjet operation is based on air entering to the inlet at a supersonic speed and
low pressure, decelerated to subsonic speed and high pressure, two conditions that provide
more convenient combustion conditions. After it is exhaust to the nozzle to provide thrust. But,
when the incoming air is travelling too fast, around Mach 5, the static pressure and temperature
produced from decelerating the flow to subsonic speed are really high, causing molecular
dissociation of the incoming flow and excessive material stress.[7] To overcome this limitation, it
was proposed to decelerate the air but keeping it still supersonic; this was called supersonic
ramjet or scramjet.
As shown in figure 1.4, due to the condition in the combustion chamber for the ramjet a physical
nozzle is installed to maintain the desired inlet operational conditions. However, for the
supersonic counterpart an area increase is expected to provide the right heat conditions during
the combustion gas release. [3]
Scramjets
recovered heat into kinetic energy require long distances, heavier and longer nozzles have to
be designed. [3]
3. A limiting design factor for ramjets is the ratio of the nozzle throat and capture area, if this
ratio is increase then the thrust will be increased as well. But, producing a heavier nozzle.
Whereas, for scramjets, during deceleration of the flow the physical throat is substitute by a
thermal throat. [3]
4. A lighter construction and increased system efficiency is accomplish with scramjets by the
lower static pressure which reduces the structural load of engines ducts. [3]
It is possible to say that all these facts are the bright side of scramjet. However when it comes
to its operational characteristics and its integration with the aircraft, a lot of considerable design
difficulties have to be taken into account. [3]
1. The time air remains inside the scramjet is in the order of millisecond, hence to provide an
optimal mix between oxygen and fuel is complicated, as air remains in the combustion
chamber very few time. Usually, mechanism to accelerate the mix are used, however they
create momentum losses, sacrificing the overall efficiency of the engine. [3]
2. The fact that air travels so fast create the problem of maintaining the flame on, so flame
holders must be placed. [3]
3. The high speeds aircraft achieves will create a large temperature around itself and the
engine. Usually, fuel is used as coolant. Most common fuels are liquid hydrogen and
hydrocarbons. Liquid hydrogen is a good choice to cool down the entire engine; however it
has a very low density, thus larger amounts of fuel have to be carried for each flight. Whereas,
hydrocarbons have higher density but its cooling capacity is smaller and sometimes not
enough to absorb all the heat created around the engine and the
aircraft. [3]
4. A recurrent problem, already mentioned in previous sections, is the fact that scramjets
cannot operate from takeoff and during low speed flight they are very inefficient. Hence, more
propulsion devices are required. But as speed increases, the integration between vehicle
aerodynamics and engine performance become more coupled. Also the integration of
several components in the aircraft will add more weight and aerodynamics problems, related
mostly to creation of drag.
Scramjets
5. Testing new concept in ground represents a challenge itself, because the difficulty to achieve
high Mach numbers and the noise that the tunnel creates, which interferes with the boundary
layer transition. [1]
Further explanation of some of these issues will be provided.
2. Normal injection. It consists of a blast of fuel in a direction perpendicular to the air through a
port on the wall. The problem is that a detached normal shock is created upstream of the
injector, causing flow separation and losses in total pressure, thus affecting the efficiency of
9
Scramjets
the engine. However, separation can be used downstream as a flame holder. In overall is not
a very efficient method as the mixing rate is not so high.
3. Ramp injectors. This method is an improvement of the parallel injection. It consists of ramps
that have an injector on the trailing edge adding velocity to the fuel and increasing fuel mixing.
These ramps also create normal shocks and expansion fans, hence pressure gradients
increase mixing as well. There are two kinds of ramps, expansion and compression ramps.
As compressing ramps increase the fuel air mixing, expansion ramps have higher
combustion efficiency. However, the way ramps are placed inside the combustion chamber
provides low fuel penetration throughout the flow field.
4. Strut injector. It consists of a strut with a wedge leading edge placed all along the vertical axis
of the combustion chamber, injectors are placed on the trailing edge of the strut, this provides
the fuel to be added in all the flow field. It can be added either parallel or normal to the free
stream direction. However, it produces high pressures losses, decreasing its performance.
Recently research suggests that with a different shape of strut, pressure losses can be
10
Scramjets
decreased, some suggestions are to change the shape of the trailing edge or to make a strut
in a diamond shape.
5. Pylon injection: It is very similar to the parallel injection method but instead of having just a
splitter plate, there is a tall narrow in-stream body. Injection could be either axial, normal or at
some angle. Research has showed that flow penetration and mixing are high as pressure
losses low, in comparison with the previous methods.
Certainly, there are many more injection systems. Just to mention some; plasma igniter,
upstream injector, barbitage injection system, pulsed injector, cavity-pylon flame holder,
micro-flame holder, conventional scale bluff body flame holder, cantilever fuel injector, however it
is not the purpose of this work to go in depth of all these, rather is to present the basic idea and
reference of all of them.
Scramjets
free stream is 5 or more time larger than the local sonic velocity are complicated. Basically, and
according to equation 1.1, there are two solutions to this problem, one is to provide a really high
free stream velocity and the other one is to make sonic velocity really small. In order to make a
decision the equation to get the speed of sound is shown:
1.2
Where is the heat capacity ratio, R the universal gas constant and T is the local temperature in
kelvin degrees.
So, from the two solution proposed, the first one provides a really challenging situation as the
free stream velocity of Mach 5 or higher is difficult to accomplish. Hence, the second solution will
bring an easier way to achieve wind tunnel testing. From equation 1.2, it is possible to see that
and R are gas constants; therefore the only parameter that could be varied is the temperature.
Hence, test gas is expanded to provide a static temperature just above liquefaction temperature.
This is a safe path to achieve a high Mach number and keeping safe the surrounding equipment.
As total enthalpies related to hypersonic flights are really high, simulation of these conditions are
not possible to recreate in ground without causing equipment damage or just for a very small
period of time.
Another wind tunnel problem is related to the prediction of boundary layer transition is difficult to
understand and predict. A variety of experiments have been performed to produce a
semi-empirical model to predict transition at different flight conditions as well as attempts to use
linear stability theory, but all of them have inaccurate results. Recent research points that maybe,
one of the problems to get accurate results is the noise produce by the wind tunnel. If it is true, all
the information gotten so far will have to be discarded. [1] And a quiet hypersonic wind tunnel
must be constructed; however difficulties for this task are still in the second quadrant of
Figure 1.1.
2.3.3 Fuels
As mentioned before, there are two different fuels used for scramjets application, both of them
having advantages and disadvantages. Table 1.1 shows a comparison of them.
12
Scramjets
Advantages
Limitations
surfaces.
vehicle weight.
hydrogen
Hydrocarbons
Scramjets
is heated, then the hot gas moves to the cool side of the heat pipe to discharge the heat and after
it comes back through the wick to start the process again. Ablators are used where really high
temperatures are reached. It is a layer of a chemical product that will pyrolyze as it absorbs heat,
leaving a layer of char between the outer surface and the ablator.
Finally, the concept of active systems is using pipes and pumps to circulate coolant through the
high heat zones, absorbing it and then bringing it to a low heat area. Where it is discharged and
the process starts again. In comparison, this is the best method to keep the key areas cool,
however, it is expensive and makes the design more complex. Also, the weight of the vehicle is
increased from the pipes, pumps and coolants. Convective cooling is the only one that does not
add an extra weight from the coolant, as it uses the fuel to cool the structure and then it is
brought to the combustion chamber to be burn. It does not only have a beneficial impact in the
temperature of the cooled area, but it also benefits combustion, as it brings the fuel already hot,
facilitating burning and cutting the time it has to mix with oxygen and burn.
14
Scramjets
[7]
. The international situation after the war was very tense, the United States
and former Soviet Union started an overwhelming race of scientific and technologic
developments, specially in the military aerospace applications, such as missiles, reconnaissance
aircrafts, satellites and space vehicles; all of these having the particular interest or requirement of
hypersonic cruise speeds. Important developments have also been made in Australia, France,
Japan, Germany and England. Tables 3.1 and 3.2 [7] present a summary of hypersonic flight
projects in the world since the 1950s.
[4,7]
engine with a Mach 4 to 7 range; as well as two demonstration engine models, the structural
assembly model (SAM) and the aerothermodynamic integration model (AIM), independently
tested to corroborate structural and flowpath performance respectively. The 107 tests that were
carried on these models provided an extensive and important performance overview at 5 M 7.
In the US, the supersonic combustion engine development in the following years, the HRE was
not of great importance until 1986, when the National Aero-Space Plane (NASP) program was
settled to develop a combined-cycle scramjet to be used in the hypersonic aircraft X-30,
promising to fly up to Mach 25, something unfeasible due to the Hypersonic TRL of that year.
Important advances in CFD and design methodology for hypersonic regimes, as well as new
propulsion integration methods and structures were some of the advances carried at the NASP
program.
15
Scramjets
[7]
required to develop confidence in future hypersonic vehicle designs. The first flight of the X-43A
was attempted in 2001 but the mission was canceled just 13.5 s before launch due to a booster
failure. [8]
France
After the first American studies on scramjet engines, the world research community showed
great interest in hypersonic flights beyond Mach 6-7. The French started the ESCOPE program
in 1966, inspired by the HRE program, focused on demonstrating dual-mode scramjet in a
flight-test program at Mach 7. [7] In a series of tests conducted in 1970 and 1972, complete
supersonic ignition was not achieved, going only until transonic combustion at Mach 5.
16
[4]
Scramjets
[4,7]
started in 1999, concerning an air-to-surface missile with flight speeds of Mach 2-8 at high
altitudes.
Russia
Scramjet R&D in Russia has been on the map since the late 1950s, having an important
increment in the 1980s and 1990s.
[7]
conducted in Russia remained classified until its end in late 1980s, when the war ended; due to
the restricted access to the Russian literature, it was until Curran [4] collected the most important
contributions of the soviets in English edition that they became accessible to the worldwide
scientific community.
Russia had a lot of activity in the early 1990s, performing the very first hypersonic flight test
(Mach 5.35) in 1991, and two combined Russian-French launches in 1992 and 1995. In 1994,
they joint-ventured with NASA to study the operating of the scramjet at full supersonic
combustion.[7] American tests of the Russian engine were planned, but never done. The program
ORYOL was established by the Russian Space Agency to carry a comprehensive research and
development of combined propulsion systems for reusable space transportation.
17
[4]
Scramjets
One of the most promising concepts of hypersonic vehicles started its conception in the mid
1990s.
[4]
Figure 3.3 The First Russian scramjet model tested 1964 [4]
Germany
Germany entered the hypersonic air-breathing propulsion development efforts first in the 1980s
with the German Hypersonic Technology Program (HTP), which had the purpose to develop the
Snger II concept, a two-stage, fully reusable, future space transportation vehicle.
[4,7]
Cooperating with France, Germany also participated in the development of JAPHAR in 1997,
concerning hypersonic air-breathing propulsion for reusable launch vehicles between Mach 48,
which ended in 2001. [4,7]
18
Scramjets
Japan
The National Aerospace Laboratory in Japan has been very active in scramjet R&D since the
beginning of the 1990s. In 1994 the construction of a side-wall compression type scramjet engine
as well as the Ramjet Engine Test Facilit (RJTF) were completed; having the first successful
engine test in March that year. From 1994 to 2000 140 tests were conducted under flow
simulation at Mach 4, 6 and 8.
[4]
[9]
Stalker and Morgan in the T3 shock tunnel, and was continued until the T4 facilities went online
in early 1990s. Given that these facilities are located in universities, the efforts in Australia are
approached from a fundamental point of view, instead of a certain configuration; a variety of
different experiments have been conducted that provide empirical analyses on well-defined
information and an insight to unknown issues that could arise. Many experiments resulted in
more questions than answers; however, big contributions have been made regarding the
combustion of hydrogen, and some critical parameter measuring techniques have been
developed.
19
Scramjets
20
Scramjets
21
Scramjets
[10]
engine burned successfully and produced thrust, giving the results needed to keep pushing for
higher hypersonic speeds. This was the ending of the Hyper-X program, setting a invaluable
ground base for air-breathing engines in hypersonic applications. [11]
Figure 3.6 First flight of the X-43A 2001 [11] The X-43A is the black nose seen in the picture, the
rest is a Pegasus rocket, used to bring the air-breathing vehicle to the flight test conditions
22
Scramjets
NASA has been simultaneously developing other hypersonic test vehicles, with new and more
complex air-breathing propulsion systems, scramjet-airframe integration, and other technologies
required for Mach 15 cruise operation (X-43C). The X-43 B, or Reusable Combined Cycle Flight
Demonstration (RCCFD), has the objective of demonstrating the latest developments on
combined cycle propulsion technologies, as well as airframe-engine integration technologies. [8]
It has been known for a while now, that the space shuttle era is finished and that the new space
transportation required for manned reentry missions is expected for 2025
[4,11]
and scramjet
propulsion seems to be the launching approach intended for this and many other space
applications.
23
Scramjets
4 Future Developments
The aerospace field is going to be busy with air-breathing hypersonic propulsion for more years
to come. Curran [4], in is broad scramjet research compilation, anticipated that the topics of
greater interest for researchers was in the technologies that would improve the combustion
efficiencies and thus lower the costs of future flight testing as well as the operation costs of the
final developed engines.
Detonation Wave Ramjets are expected to have a better performance than the typical scramjet
at higher Mach numbers. As the air flows into the engine a set of shock waves are intentionally
generated in order to improve air-fuel mixing and igniting the mixture. The detonation wave
connotation was given because when the fuel ignites close to a normal or oblique shock, the
combustion reaction couples with the shock and generates a detonation wave.
The application of Electro-Magnetic Fields to control the flow either around or inside the
hypersonic aircraft shows another interesting concept that can help to achieve higher speeds in a
more efficient way. This technology is based on the release of partially-ionized working
propulsion fluids into the flow and control them with electro-magnetic fields to decelerate the flow
through the engine and facilitating the combustion; or also can be applied to external flow in
order to reduce drag and aerodynamic
heating.
As mentioned in the earlier chapter, both
Russian and American agencies are currently
developing the new class of launching space
vehicle. So we can still expect in several years
to come research on the integration of
airframe and hypersonic engine will be of
great proportion and importance.
24
Scramjets
[13]
programs, and at the NAL in Japan. The first stage of the X- programs by NASA, the Hyper-X,
finished in 2004 with the successful 10-second flight of a hypersonic air-breathing propelled
vehicle at almost Mach 10. The following programs are going to be dealing with two other
test-flight vehicles, the X-43C, very similar to the first version but larger and oriented towards
longer steady flights of up to 10 min. The X-43B is a lot different than the previous two, oriented
to reusability demonstration and its going to incorporate the latest advancements in combined
cycle propulsion systems going from Mach 0.77.
The development of a completely tested and efficient scramjet still has a couple of decades to
come, but with the most recent achievements of NASA, and all the programed tests to come in
the next years, there is a very optimistic atmosphere among the R&D teams confronting this
concept development.
25
Scramjets
6 References
[1] John J. Bertin, Russell M. Cummings. Fifty years of hypersonics: where weve been, where
were going, Department of Aeronautics, United States Air Force Academy, 2003.
[2] Bertin JJ. Hypersonic aerothermodynamics, The American Institute of Aeronautics and
Astronautics; 1994.
[3] Corin Segal. The scramjet engine. Process and characteristics. Cambridge University
press, 2009.
[4] Curran, E. T., & Murthy, S. N. B. (2000). Scramjet propulsion. Reston, Va: American Institute
of Aeronautics and Astronautics.
[5] Swithenbank, J. (January 01, 1967). Hypersonic air-breathing propulsion. Progress in
Aerospace Sciences, 8, 229-294.
[6] Townend, L. H. (November 01, 2001). Domain of the Scramjet. Journal of Propulsion and
Power, 17, 6, 1205-1213.
[7] Fry, R. S. (January 01, 2004). A Century of Ramjet Propulsion Technology Evolution.
Journal of Propulsion and Power, 20, 1, 27-58.
[8] L, M. P., L, R. V., T, N. L., & R, H. J. (January 01, 2004). NASA hypersonic flight
demonstrators-overview, status, and future plans. Acta Astronautica, 55, 619-630.
[9] Stalker, R. J., Paull, A., Mee, D. J., Morgan, R. G., & Jacobs, P. A. (January 01, 2005).
Scramjets and shock tunnelsThe Queensland experience. Progress in Aerospace
Sciences, 41, 6, 471-513.
[10] Thompson, E., Henry, K. & Williams, L. (2005). Faster Than a Speeding Bullet: Guinness
Recognizes NASA Scramjet. NASA News, [online] 20th June. Retrieved from:
http://www.nasa.gov/home/hqnews/2005/jun/HQ_05_156_X43A_Guinness.html [Accessed:
10 Dec 2013].
[11] McClinton, C. R., Rausch, V. L., Shaw, R. J., Metha, U., & Naftel, C. (January 01, 2005).
Hyper-X: Foundation for future hypersonic launch vehicles. Acta Astronautica, 57, 614-622.
[12] NASA Facts (2004). NASA Hyper-X Program Demonstrates Scramjet Technologies, X-43A
Flight Makes Aviation History. [press release] October 20.
[13] Muller,
D.
(2013).
SCRAMSPACE.
[video
online]
Available
26
at: