Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Creativity Thresholds (June 1, 2014). Texas Law Review, Vol. 93, p. 1921,
2014; Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2443667 (Introduction
and pages 1932-74, 1977-80)
Christopher J. Buccafusco and Christopher Sprigman, The Creativity
Effect (July 22, 2010). University of Chicago Law Review, Vol. 78, p. 31, 2011.
Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1647009
Joseph Fishman, Creating Around Copyright (July 13, 2014). Harvard Law
Review, Vol. 128, Forthcoming. Available at
SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2465590 (pages 2-8; 24-55)
RECOMMENDED
Empirical Studies Database, Center for Empirical Studies of Intellectual
Property (CESIP), Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago-Kent College of
Law, http://www.kentlaw.edu/cesip/
Session 7: Incentives Paradigm 4: Enforcement and Intermediaries, 13 Jan
Reinier H. Kraakman, Gatekeepers: The Anatomy of a Third-Party
Enforcement Strategy, 2 J. L. ECON. & ORG. 53 (1986) (pages 53-88)
Assaf Hamdani, Gatekeeper Liability, 77 S. CAL. L. REV. 53 (2003) (pages
910-930)
Digital Millennium Copyright Act, 17 USC sections 512(k)(1); 512(c);
512(i); 512(h); 512(f); 512(m); 512(j).
Claudio Ruiz Gallardo and J. Carlos Lara Glvez, Liability of Internet
Service Providers (ISPs) and the exercise of freedom of expression in Latin
America and Intermediaries in Towards an Internet Free of Censorship:
Proposals for Latin America (Center for Studies on Freedom of Expression
and Access to Information) (2012) (pages 13-34)
Leaked TPP Text, Oct. 16, 2014, Addendum III Intellectual Property
[Rights] Chapter, Non-Paper on Internet Service Provider Safe
Harbors, https://wikileaks.org/tpp-ip2/#addendum_iii
RECOMMENDED:
Margot E. Kaminski, The Capture of International Intellectual Property Law
through the U.S. Trade Regime Kaminski, (November 14, 2013). Southern
California Law Review, 2014 Forthcoming. Available at
SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2354324
Felix T. Wu, Collateral Censorship and the Limits of Intermediary Immunity,
87 Notre Dame L. Rev. 293 (2011).
Timothy Lee, Heres why Obama trade negotiators push the interests of
Hollywood and drug companies, The Washington Post, November 26,
2013, http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/theswitch/wp/2013/11/26/heres-why-obama-trade-negotiators-push-theinterests-of-hollywood-and-drug-companies/
Session 8: Commons and Peer Production, 14 Jan
Frishmann, Madison & Strandburg, Governing the Knowledge
Commons in Governing the Knowledge Commons (Oxford 2014) (pages 139)
Jack Balkin, The Future of Free Expression in a Digital Age, 33 Pepp. L. Rev.
427 (2009).
Owen Fiss, Free Speech and Social Structure, 71 Iowa L Rev 1405 (1986).
Seana Shiffrin, A Thinker-Based Approach to Freedom of Speech, 27 CONST.
COMM. 283 (2011)
Jennifer Rothman, Liberating Copyright: Thinking Beyond Free Speech, 95
Cornell L. Rev. 463 (2010) (Read Abstract and pages 513-28)
Neil W. Netanel, Copyright in a Democratic Civil Society, 106 YALE L. J. 283
(1996) (pages 341-64)
RECOMMENDED:
Hiram Melndez-Juarbe, Selected Bibliography on Copyright Law and
Freedom of Speech, September 27,
2013, http://derechoalderecho.org/2011/09/27/libertad-de-expresion-yderechos-de-autor-bibliografia-selecta/
Golan v. Holder, 132 S. Ct. 873, 181 L. Ed. 2d 835 (2012)
Harper & Row v. Nation Enterprises, 471 U.S. 539 (1985)
Session 10: Fair Use and Fair Dealing, 16 Jan
Wendy Gordon, Fair Use as market Failure: A Structural and Economic
Analysis of the Betamax Case and Its Predecessors as edited in Robert
Merges & Jane Ginsburg, Foundations of Intellectual Property, Foundation
Press 2004.
Rebecca Tushnet, Copy This Essay: How Fair Use Doctrine Harms Free
Speech and How Copying Serves It, 114 YALE L. J. 535 (2004) (pages 54962)
Fred Von Lohman, Fair Use as Innovation Policy, 23 BERKELEY TECH. L. J 1
(2008)
Niva Elkin-Koren and Orit Fischman Afori, Taking Users' Rights to the
Next Level: A Pragmatist Approach to Fair Use (August 20, 2014). Cardozo
Arts & Entertainment Law Journal, Vol. 33, 2014 Forthcoming. Available at
SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2483939
Michael Geist, Fairness Found: How Canada Quietly Shifted from Fair
Dealing to Fair Use, in The Copyright Pentalogy: How the supreme Court of
Canada shook the foundations of Canadian Copyright law, pages 157-186
RECOMMENDED
The Authors Guild v Google, US Disrict Ct NY, 05 Civ. 8136 (DC), November
14, 2013.
William W Fisher III, Reconstructing the Fair Use Doctrine, 101 Harv. L.
Rev. 1659, 1673 (1988) as edited in Robert Merges & Jane Ginsburg,
Foundations of Intellectual Property, Foundation Press 2004.
Yu, Peter K., The Confuzzling Rhetoric Against New Copyright Exceptions
(July 15, 2014). Kritika, Vol. 1, 2014. Available at
SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2466544
Session 11: Taking the User Seriously: Capabilities and the User / Brief
Presentations: Final Essays, 19 Jan
Julie Cohen, Configuring the Networked Self (2012) (Chapters 3 and 4)
Yu, Peter K., Can the Canadian UGC Exception Be Transplanted Abroad?
(March 7, 2014). Intellectual Property Journal, Vol. 27, 2014. Available at
SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2405821
RECOMMENDED
Amartya Sen, The Idea of Justice (2009) (selection)
Session 12: Moral Limits of markets?, 20 Jan
Margaret Jane Radin, Market-Inalienability, 100 HARV L. REV. 1849
(1987) (pages 1852-70; 1903-21)
Michael Sandel, What Money Cant Buy: The Moral Limits of Markets, as
edited in Rethinking Commodification: Cases and Readings in Law and
Culture (Martha Ertman & Joan Williams, Eds, 2005), (pages 122-127)
Debra Satz, The Moral Limits of Markets (2010) (Noxious markets) (pages
4-13)
Madhavi Sunder, Property in Personhood, in Rethinking Commodification:
Cases and Readings in Law and Culture (Martha Ertman & Joan Williams, Eds,
2005)
Wendy J. Gordon, The Why of Markets: Fair Use and Circularity, 116 YALE
L.J. POCKET PART 371
(2007), http://yalelawjournal.org/2007/4/25/gordon.html;
Rebecca L. Tushnet, Economies of Desire: Fair Use and Marketplace
Assumptions, 51 Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 513 (2009) (pages 522-536)