Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
32.
33.
34.
35.
36.
37.
38.
39.
40.
41.
42.
43.
44.
45.
46.
47.
48.
49.
50.
51.
52.
53.
54.
55.
56.
57.
58.
59.
60.
61.
62.
Trial 1
.254g
43.7mL
44.2mL
34.1mL
0.0222M
Trial 2
.250g
36.2mL
43.7mL
33.2mL
0.0225M
Trial 3
.251g
27.0mL
35.2mL
34.0mL
0.0220M
Trial 1
0.3001g
1.0mL
24.0mL
23.0mL
0.1301g
43.3%
0.2%
Trial 2
0.3003g
24.0mL
47.0mL
23.0mL
0.1301g
43.3%
0.2%
Average
Calculations:
Balancing the Oxidation-Reduction Reaction:
V10O286- + H2SO3 VO2+ + HSO4V10O286- + H2SO3 10VO2+ + HSO4V10O286- + H2SO3 10VO2+ + HSO4- + 17H2O
43.3%
0.2%
Trial 2:
.0230L X .0222M X 50.9451g/mol X 5 = .1301g
Conclusions: In this lab, standardization of a solution of potassium permanganate allowed us to characterize an
unknown solution of decavanadate and determine its percent vanadium by mass. This lab focused on the
synthesis of the decavandate, the characterization of the decavanadate, and the standardization of potassium
permanganate. Our three trials revealed that our potassium permanganate had an average molarity of .0222M
with individual values of .0222M, .0220M, and .0225M. These standardized values were fairly precise with less
than 2% variation on either side of the average value. Possible sources of error in the standardization process
include incomplete filtration of the potassium permanganate, although it is more likely that error arose in the
titration process itself, most likely in the realm of over titrating the solution or improper distinction of a
persisting pink color. When characterizing the decavandate, both trials, and thusly the average came to be
43.3% vanadium by mass. Since both trials yielded the same result, our precision was perfect but when
compared with the theoretical value our accuracy was also very good with a .2% margin of error. Sources of
error in characterization of the decavandate are largely a part of knowing when the solution has been
completely titrated without going over the point where it is complete. Overall, however, our results proved to
be both precise and accurate despite the difficulty associated with titrations.