Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Execution Date:2005-01-01
1 Context
4 Product Classification
5 Technology Requirements
6 Experiment Approach
1 Context
These criteria regulate the product classification, technology
requirements, experiment approach, regulation for test, package, sign,
transit and storage of chromium alloy cast grinding balls for minerals
industry.
These criteria can be applied to chromium alloy cast grinding balls for
minerals industry. (ab.cast balls).Other cast balls for industrial use can
also take these criteria as reference.
4 Product Classification
4.1 According to the percentage of Chromium, cast balls can be classified
as high Chromium cast balls, medium Chromium cast balls and low
Chromium cast balls with 5 tallies. According to the heat processing,
cast balls with the same tally can be divided as quenching ones and
non-quenching ones.
4.2 There are 16 specifications of cast balls according to their diameter.
The diameter deviation of 10-25 and30-120 cast balls can
respectively answer for the regulations in GB/T6414-1999 on CT9
and CT10 accuracy. See Table 1
Table 1
Specification
Items
10
Diameter
Deviation
12
15
17
20
25
30
+1.5
-0.5
40
50
+1.5
-1.0
60
70
80
+2.0
-1.0
90
100
110
120
125
+2.5
-1.0
4.4.3 Example: a cast ball with its tally ZQCr15A and diameter100mm
is to be labeled as: ZQCr15A-100.
5 Technology Requirements
5.1 The diameter deviation of the cast balls should be no more than that
of the balls with the same specification.
5.2 The shape deviation of the cast balls should be no more than the
diameter deviation of the balls with the same specification.
5.3 The chemical components of the cast balls should answer for the
regulations in Table 2
Table 2
Name
Chemical Components%
Tally
C
Mo
Cu
Ti
16-19
0-1.0
0-1.2
0-0.3
0-0.
15
0.10
0.06
14-16
0-1.0
0-1.2
0-0.3
0-0.
15
0.10
0.06
High
10-14 0-1.0
0-1.2 0-0.3 0-0.
ZQCr12 1.8- 0.3Chromium
15
3.2 1.5
Cast Ball
Medium
0-1.0
0-1.2 0-0.3 0-0.
ZQCr8
2.1- 0.5- 0.5- 7-10
Chromium
3.2 2.2 1.5
15
Cast Ball
Low
0-0.8 0-0.3 0-0.
ZQCr2
2.0- 0.5- 0.5- 1-3
0-1.0
Chromium
3.6 1.5 1.5
15
Cast Ball
Remarks: the chemical components within the brackets are applicable for A balls
0.10
0.06
0.10
0.06
0.10
0.08
High
Chromium
Cast Ball
High
Chromium
Cast Ball
Si Mn
ZQCr17
2.03.2
0.31.0
ZQCr15
1.83.2
0.31.2
0.41.5
(1.62.5)
Cr
Name
High Chromium
Cast Ball
High Chromium
Cast Ball
High Chromium
Cast Ball
Medium Chromium
Cast Ball
Low Chromium
Cast Ball
Tally
Table 3
Surface Hardness(HRC)
Quenching (A)
Non-Quenching (B)
ZQCr17
56
48
ZQCr15
56
50
ZQCr12
56
50
ZQCr8
56
48
ZQCr2
52
46
10S25
30S50
60S90
100S120
proportional
remaining
rag(mm)
1.0
2.0
0.8
1.5
3.0
1.0
2.0
4.0
1.0
2.5
5.0
1.5
Remarks: S in the table stands for the diameter of cast ball.
hole(not beading)
depth
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
each
area
4
6
10
12
total
area
16
30
45
60
6 Experiment Approach
6.1 According to the regulations in 5.1, 5.2 and 5.7.2, if we use a
measuring mean with accuracy no less than 1/10mm to measure, we
should avoid the parts which can cause measurement error due to the
surface flaw.
6.2 To test and arbitrage 5.4 , see the regulations in GB/T22.3-1981,
GB/T223.2-1981,GB/T223.3-1988,GB/T223.4-1988,
GB/T223.11-1991, GB/T223.14-2000, GB/T223.16-1991,
GB/T223.18-1994, GB/T223.26-1989, GB/T223.60-1997,
GB/T223.63-1998: test executed according to GB/T5678-1985 is
acceptable.
6.3 Hardness difference and macroscopic structure fabrication
The sampling of hardness difference and macroscopic structure can
be fabricated by electric discharge wire-cutting approach. The tangent
plant of the sample should be vertical to the joint face of the cast ball
and through the centre of inner runner and nucellus. The cutting
surface should be grinded at least 1mm; If we employ the mechanical
processing approach to fabricate sample, the cutting surface should be
grinded at least 2mm.
6.4 To test the surface hardness (5.4.1) and the hardness difference (5.4.2),
see GB/T230. To test the hardness, check through the diameter of the
center of inner runner, in each 5mm.
6.5 To test 5.4, execute on the grinding face regulated in 6.3. The
approach should find reference in GB/T226.
6.6 To test 5.5 and 5.7.1, check by eyes.
6.7 To test the weariness life of cast ball in the falling sphere impact test
in 5.4.3, see the regulations in Appendix A of GB/T17445-1998.
6.8 To test the clip index and consumption in 5.6, see the regulations in
Appendix A.
A
B
C
1.0
4.0
6.5
randomly every half production month, if the cast balls are of same
tally and same processing technology. The cast balls of same tally and
same processing technology should be checked at least one time for
each month. The result of the weariness life of cast ball in the falling
sphere impact test should answer for the regulations in 5.4.3.
7.8 Overall test.
It requires an overall test if any of the following circumstances occurs
and the test should answer for all the technology requirements in
these criteria:
a. A new product is undertaken trial-produce;
b. The processing technology is undertaken an improvement which
might affect the quality of the products.
c. If the products have been batch produced, we should check at least
one time for every half year.
d. Re-produce after stopping production for a long time.
e. There is obvious difference between exworks test and previous
overall test.
f. The national quality inspection organ requires an overall test.
Appendix A
The Clip Index and Consumption of the Cast Balls
A1 The clip index should be calculated according to the following
formula:
P=(Q1+Q2)(Q3+Q4)100%
P--------the clip index of the cast ball, %;
Q1------the quantity of the clip balls from the mill in gear, t;
Q2------the quantity of the clip balls from the mill when the mill is
stopped for check, t;
Q3------the quantity of the grinding balls when the mill is to be first
installed, t;
Q4------the quantity of the adding grinding balls in the mill in gear, t.