Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
2.4. Rewrite the following equations in their clearest and most appropriate forms:
(a) x= 3.323 1.4 mm
(b) t =1,234,567 54,321 s
(c) A= 5.33 X 10^-7 3.21 X 10^-9 m
(d) r =0.000,000,538 0.000,000,03 mm
2.16. You have learned (or will learn) in optics that certain lenses (namely,
thin spherical lenses) can be characterized by a parameter called the focal
length / and that if an object is placed at a distance p from the lens, the lens
forms an image at a distance q, satisfying the lens equation, 11/ = (lip) +
(l/q), where / always has the same value for a given lens. To check if these
ideas apply to a certain lens, a student places a small light bulb at various
distances p from the lens and measures the location q of the corresponding
images. She then calculates the corresponding values of l from the lens
equation and obtains the results shown in Table 2.9.
Make a plot of l against p, with appropriate error bars, and decide if it is
true that this particular lens has a unique focal length f
Table 2.9. Object distances p (in cm) and corresponding focal lengths
f (I cm); for
Problem) 2.16.
Object distance p
(negligible uncertainty)
Focal length f
45
55
28
65
75
33
85
(all 2)
34
37
40
2.18 If a stone is thrown vertically upward with speed v, it should rise to a height h
given by v2 = 2gh. In particular, v2 should be proportional to h. To test this
proportionality, a student measures v2 and h for seven different throws and gets the
results shown in Table 2.11.
(a) Make a plot of v2 against h, including vertical and horizontal error bars. (As usual,
use squared paper, label your axes, and choose your scale sensibly.) Is your plot
consistent with the prediction that v2 <X h?
(b) The slope of your graph should be 2g. To find the slope, draw what seems to be the
best straight line through the points and then measure its slope. To find the
uncertainty in the slope, draw the steepest and least steep lines that seem to fit the
data reasonably. The slopes of these lines give the largest and smallest probable
values of the slope.
Are your results consistent with the accepted value 2g = 19.6 m/s^2?
Table 2.11
Heights and
Speeds of a stone thrown
Vertically upward
h (m)
all 0.05
0.4
0.8 1
1.4 2
2.0 3
2.6 4
3.4 6
3.8 7
v^2 (m^2/s^2)
73
73
53
84
55
25
26
4.18 After measuring the speed of sound u several times, a student concludes that the
standard deviation (Tu of her measurements is (Tu = 10 m/s. If all uncertainties were truly
random, she could get any desired precision by making enough measurements and averaging.
(a) How many measurements are needed to give a final uncertainty of 3 m/s?
(b) How many for a final uncertainty of only
0.5 m/s?
Systematic Errors
4.24. In some experiments, systematic errors can be caused by the neglect of an effect that is not
(in the situation concerned) negligible, for example, neglect of heat losses from a badly insulated
calorimeter or neglect of friction for a poorly lubricated cart. Here is another example: A student
wants to measure the acceleration of gravity g by timing the fall of a wooden ball (3 or 4 inches
across) dropped from four different windows in a tall building. He assumes that air resistance is
negligible and that the distance fallen is given by d = ~g? Using a tape measure and an electric
timer, he measures the distances and times of the four separate drops as follows:
Distance, d (meters): 15.43 17.37 19.62 21.68
Time, t (seconds): 1.804 1.915 2.043 2.149
(a) Copy these data and add a third row in which you put the corresponding accelerations,
calculated as g = 2d/f.
(b) Based on these results, what is his best estimate for g, assuming that all errors are random?
Show that this answer is inconsistent with the accepted value of g = 9.80 m/s2.
(c) Having checked his calculations, tape measure, and timer, he concludes (correctly) that
there must be some systematic error causing an acceleration different from 9.80 m/s2, and he
suggests that air resistance is probably the culprit. Give at least two arguments to support this
suggestion.
(d) Suggest a couple of ways he could modify the experiment to reduce the effect of this
systematic error.
[Although the percent uncertainties in the five measurements of I are probably not exactly the
same, it is appropriate (and time saving) in many experiments to assume they are at least
approximately so. In other words, instead of doing five separate error propagations, you may
often appropriately do just one for a representative case and assume that all five cases are
reasonably similar.]
4.28.
Systematic errors sometimes arise when the experimenter unwittingly measures the wrong
quantity. Here is an example: A student tries to measure g using a pendulum made of a steel
ball suspended by a light string. (See Figure 4.4.) He records five different lengths of the
pendulum l and the corresponding periods T as follows: