Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
http://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-30483873?print=true
MAGAZINE
16 December 2014 Last updated at 17:43 ET
Viewpoint: Why the shadow of WW1 and 1989 hangs over world events
COMMENTS (555)
Many of today's global problems are hangovers from bad, ungenerous decisions at the end of previous conflicts, writes
Jeffrey Sachs.
This has been a year of great geopolitical anniversaries. We are at the 100th anniversary of the start of World War One, an event
that more than any other shaped world history during the past century. We are at the 25th anniversary of the fall of the Berlin Wall,
the opening chapter of the demise of the Soviet empire and the end of the Cold War. Yet we know that painfully we observe
something far more than a mere remembrance.
As William Faulkner remarked, "The past is never dead. It's not even past." WW1 and the fall of the Wall continue to shape our
most urgent realities today. The wars in Syria and Iraq are the legacy of the closure of WW1, and dramatic events in Ukraine are
unfolding in the long shadow of 1989.
1914 and 1989 are "hinge moments", decisive points of history on which subsequent events turn. How nations both great and
small behave at such hinge moments determine the future course of war and peace.
I participated directly and personally in the events of 1989, and saw this lesson in play - positively in the case of Poland and
negatively in the case of Russia. And I can tell you that as I carried out my own tasks as an economic adviser during 1989-92, I
kept a constant and always worried gaze on 1914. I carry that same sense of worry today.
In 1919, at the end of WW1, the great British economist John Maynard Keynes taught us invaluable and lasting lessons about
such hinge moments, how decisions of victors impact the economies of the vanquished, and how missteps by the powerful can
set the course of future wars.
With uncanny insight, prescience, and literary flair, Keynes's 1919 The Economic Consequences of the Peace predicted that the
cynicism and shortsightedness at the core of the Versailles Treaty, especially the imposition of punitive war reparations on
Germany, and the lack of solutions to the roiling financial crises of the debtor countries, would condemn the European economies
to continuing crisis, and would in fact invite the rise of another vengeful tyrant in the coming generation.
Keynes's cri de coeur is one of those remarkable outpourings of genius that speaks across generations. That book and its lessons
proved to be a formative guide for me in my own career as policy adviser and analyst.
As a newly minted economist some 30 years ago, I suddenly found myself charged with helping a small and largely forgotten
country, Bolivia, to find a way out of its own unmitigated economic disaster. Keynes's writings helped me to understand that
Bolivia's financial crisis should be viewed in social and political terms, and that Bolivia's creditor, the US, had a shared
responsibility of resolving Bolivia's financial anguish.
My experience in Bolivia in 1985-86 soon brought me to Poland in the spring of 1989, at a dual invitation of Poland's final
communist government and the Solidarity trade union movement that strongly opposed it. Poland, like Bolivia, was financially
bankrupt. And Europe in 1989, like Europe in 1919, was at a great hinge-moment of history.
John Maynard Keynes (1883-1946)
Educated at Eton and Cambridge University, where he read mathematics - part of the cultural circle known as the Bloomsbury Group
Joined the Treasury during WW1, and in the wake of the 1919 Versailles peace treaty, published The Economic Consequences of the Peace, criticising exorbitant war reparations
1 of 5
12/17/14 11:24 AM
BBC News - Viewpoint: Why the shadow of WW1 and 1989 h...
http://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-30483873?print=true
demanded from Germany, claiming they would harm the country's economy and foster a desire for revenge
Best-known work, The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money (1936) made Keynes Britain's most influential economist
Led 1944 British delegation to Bretton Woods conference in US, playing an important role in planning of World Bank and International Monetary Fund
2 of 5
12/17/14 11:24 AM
BBC News - Viewpoint: Why the shadow of WW1 and 1989 h...
http://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-30483873?print=true
the history, as they say, and the US felt very much the victor of the Cold War. The US would therefore remain blameless in any
accounts of Russia's mishaps after 1991, and that remains true today.
It took me 20 years to gain a proper understanding of what had happened after 1991. Why had the US, which had behaved with
such wisdom and foresight in Poland, acted with such cruel neglect in the case of Russia? Step by step, and memoir by memoir,
the true story came to light. The West had helped Poland financially and diplomatically because Poland would become the
Eastern ramparts of an expanding Nato. Poland was the West, and was therefore worthy of help. Russia, by contrast, was viewed
by US leaders roughly the same way that Lloyd George and Clemenceau had viewed Germany at Versailles - as a defeated
enemy worthy to be crushed, not helped.
A recent book by a former Nato commander, General Wesley Clark, recounts a 1991 conversation he had with Paul Wolfowitz,
who was then the Pentagon's policy director. Wolfowitz told Clark that the US had learned that it could now act with impunity in the
Middle East, and ostensibly in other regions as well, without any threat of Russian interference.
In short, the US would behave like a victor and a bully, claiming the fruits of Cold War victory through wars of choice if necessary.
The US would be on top, and Russia would be unable to stop it.
In a recent speech in Moscow, Putin has described US behaviour in almost the same terms as Wolfowitz. "The Cold War ended,"
said Putin, "but it did not end with the signing of a peace treaty with clear and transparent agreements on respecting existing rules
or creating new rules and standards. This created the impression that the so-called 'victors' in the Cold War had decided to
pressure events and reshape the world to suit their own needs and interests."
By making these observations I do not mean to exonerate Putin of responsibility for Russia's recent illegal, cynical, and dangerous
acts of violence in Ukraine. But I do mean to help explain them. The shadow of 1989 looms large. And Nato's continued desire,
expressed again just recently, to add Ukraine to its membership, thereby putting Nato right up on the Russian border, must be
regarded as profoundly unwise and provocative.
1914, 1989, 2014. We live in history. In Ukraine, we face a Russia embittered over the spread of Nato and by US bullying since
1991. In the Middle East, we face the ruins of the Ottoman Empire, destroyed by WW1, and replaced by the cynicism of European
colonial rule and US imperial pretentions.
We face, most importantly, choices for our time. Will we use power cynically and to dominate, believing that territory, Nato's long
reach, oil reserves, and other booty are the rewards of power? Or will we exercise power responsibly, knowing that generosity and
beneficence builds trust, prosperity, and the groundwork for peace? In each generation, the choice must be made anew.
You can listen to The Shadow of the Cold War on BBC Radio 4's Four Thought on 17 November at 20:45 GMT, or via the
iPlayer.
Subscribe to the BBC News Magazine's email newsletter to get articles sent to your inbox.
Your comments (555)
3 of 5
12/17/14 11:24 AM
BBC News - Viewpoint: Why the shadow of WW1 and 1989 h...
http://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-30483873?print=true
Elsewhere on BBC
BBC NEWS - NEWS
BBC CULTURE
BBC CULTURE
BBC AUTOS
Recommended by Outbrain
Comments
Sign in or Register to comment and rate comments
All posts are reactively-moderated and must obey the house rules.
Latest First
Highest Rated
Lowest Rated
555. Truthteller
6 MINUTES AGO
-2
554. GreenGoddess
9 MINUTES AGO
+3
It's all very well blaming the West for the state of Russia but Putin has had
enough time and enough money to transform Russia into a thriving
democracy. Instead he chose to line his and his cronies' pockets, rig
national elections and jail/kill any opposition.
Even if the West HAD given Russia aid in the 90's there's no reason why
Putin still wouldn't have been elected and destroyed the country.
-1
+2
4 of 5
12/17/14 11:24 AM
BBC News - Viewpoint: Why the shadow of WW1 and 1989 h...
http://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-30483873?print=true
FDR had no love for Germany, scarcely more for Russia and only a
modicum of respect for Churchill's opinion, but he still knew the US would
have to enter the war ON Britain's side eventually and did all he could to
give the UK lend-lease in the meantime.
Go back to school and re-do your GCSE History mate!
551. LUFCAT
+3
14 MINUTES AGO
Hmm, so Russia has been bullied and that is why it bullies its smaller
neighbours. Or just maybe Russia is a mafia state where it is normal for
the strong to take what they want from the weak.
Comments 5 of 555
Show More
5 of 5
12/17/14 11:24 AM