Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Teampl Deirbhile, St. Dervilas Church, near the tip of the Mullet peninsula, Co. Mayo
(Dunraven 1875)
Even if post-Med is starting to find more acceptance and prominence, the sub-discipline of
what may be termed modern archaeology still has a long way to go. One well-known example
is the popular and professional reactions to the famous Transit Van excavation. It has
occasionally crossed my mind to ponder on the question: how awful does it have to be before
archaeologists refuse to study it? Considering the propensity for archaeologists to literally
study piles of old rubbish, from a towering mound of disused amphorae in Rome, to the waste
from George Washingtons house, right down to the Tucson Garbage Project, Ive often
presumed that theres pretty much no limit to what well consider investing our time and
cerebral effort in. In events unrelated to these questions, I was recently invited to partake in a
discussion on what was described as graveyard tat all the ugly, tasteless, plastic clutter that
(in every sense) profanes our graveyards as the places of quiet, contemplation, mourning, and
rest eternal that they should be. I would make it quite clear that I considered this an
archaeological question only in so far as it despoiled the beauty of the graveyards especially
our older ones where the recent dead lie shoulder-to-shoulder with their ancestors, often in
the shadow of a suitably decaying Medieval ruin. In places like this, I feel, that this form of
plastic tat is visually distracting, out of place, and downright ugly it is repulsive and should,
rightly, be condemned. No matter how great the appetite for the archaeology of what one may
term more recent times, I think that only the most ardent would readily embrace this
awfulness as an area of study. Well, thats where I had started in my thinking.
However, after having looked at quite a few pictures of this kind of stuff, I find that I have
changed my opinion well, up to a point. I still see this material as horrible tat, but looking
on this as archaeologists, we should be aware that however horrible it is it is still relatively
ephemeral and, in the grand scheme of things, will not last too long on a grave. In a hundred
years time they will be gone, leaving only the clean stone monument. Im not suggesting for
even a second that we should regard them as high art. Nor should we think any better of them
as artefacts, no matter how much genuine affection and sorrow they represent by those
bereaved. Nonetheless, I do think we should be recording a sample of them in all their
Decaying glass dome protected by rusting wire cage. Photo: Pete Birkinshaw.
I think, perhaps, the reasons that we find this detritus so objectionable are manifold. In the
first instance, its mass-produced nature seems at odds to the very personal and individual
grieving that it represents. Its relative impermanence certainly in a pristine state means
that for the majority of time that it is publically visible it is either decaying on a relatively new
grave, or moldering on a communal cemetery rubbish heap. Tied to this sense of
impermanence is the idea that this form of ornament is a relatively modern occurrence. It is
pretty easy to fall into this way of thinking theyre all nasty plastic eyesores, probably with
made in China or made in Taiwan stamped somewhere on them obviously theyre a
modern phenomenon! While this incarnation may be modern, the urge to place symbols of
mourning however impermanent on the grave of a family member or friend is a strong one
and is hardwired into our makeup. Im sure that there are many examples of older sources out
there describing the state of graveyards in times past, but this is my favourite. It is a
description of Teampl Deirbhile, St. Dervilas Church, near the tip of the Mullet peninsula,
Co. Mayo (Dunraven 1875, 107).
possess no redeeming artistic features (to us, in this time) and I certainly dont want any of
them over me when my time comes but no more than the fact that Im fascinated by the
description of the graveyard at Teampl Deirbhile, Ive started to think that there will be
wonder and interest in the tat of today by the archaeologists of the future!