Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
CONTENTS
Introduction
Additional Revenue Generation
Case Study: 5 MW solar PV project by Reliance
Industries
Surplus Power Generation
Carbon Revenue
Additional Capital Cost
Conclusion
- Payback period
INTRODUCTION
METHODOLOGY
Solar PV projects by Lanco Infratech subsidiaries allocated under JNNSM Phase I (Batch I)
Tariff Bids (Rs/kWh)
Claimed Annual
Generation (MWh)
11.65
11,803
26.95
Saidham Overseas
11.75
11,797
26.93
11.65
11,788
26.91
11.50
11,790
26.92
Electromech Maritech
11.60
10,346
23.62
11.55
10,239
23.58
Newton Solar
11.70
10,395
23.78
Developer
info@climate-connect.co.uk
1
ANALYSIS
The power generation capacity of projects equipped with singleaxis tracking technology is about a third more than the
conventional solar PV projects. While the capital cost of projects
with tracking systems is comparatively higher than the
conventional solar PV projects, the power output is substantially
higher.
Climate Connect Limited, 2012
info@climate-connect.co.uk
2
If the project developers are able to sell the surplus power through
third-party or power exchange route, they would be able to
generate significant additional revenue. Sale of power in the open
market also opens up the possibility to avail benefits under the
Renewable Energy Certificate (REC) scheme. However, no clear
regulatory guidelines for such power sale arrangement is currently
in place.
Parameter
Capital Cost
O&M Cost (25
Years)
Rs 9.87 crore/year
Rs 32 crore/year
Carbon Revenue
10
11.38
13.8
5.80
6.38
10%
Tracker-equipped PV#
Total Cost
15.80
17. 76
Revenue
45.28
60.82
Profit
29.48
43.06
Parameter
Increased Cost
of Tracker
Single-axis
Tracking
Project
CONCLUSION
@ Rs 3.5/kWh
Conventional
Project
PLF 19%
PLF 23.5%
PLF 25.5%
5%
4.15 years
3 years
2 years
13%
7.5 years
4.5 years
3.5 years
info@climate-connect.co.uk
3
info@climate-connect.co.uk
4