Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Lecture 36 - Lecture 39
November 18, 2014
Contents
1 Catalyst vs Promoter
2 Forms of Catalysis
3 Confirmational Analysis
3.1 Case 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.2 Case 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
3
Catalyst vs Promoter
Both stabilize the ground state as well as the transition state. but the catalyst
is one which stabilises the t.s. more than the g.s. That way it actually decreases
the activation energy of the reaction. while the promoter can only stabilise the
g.s. well enough.
Also the binding to the catalyst should not be very strong to separate the
catalyst.
Forms of Catalysis
Confirmational Analysis
3.1
Case 1
C2 H6 molecule All confirmations of each kind(staggered and eclipse) are equivalent to their
kinds.
3.2
Case 2
C4 H10 molecule Not all are equivalent but the completely anti confirmation has the lowest energy. And the energy plot is symmetric again.
If we replace one of C(2) hydrogen with -X, then the molecule will become
chiral. And due to no mirror images now, the plot remains no symmetric.
4.1
Necessary Condition
4.2
Sufficient Condition
5.1
Reaction of substituted epoxide with methanol. The protonation happens before the RDS. methanol attacks the neutral epoxide very slowly while quickly to the protonated epoxide. This catalysis depends
upon the protonating power of the solution only.
S + H + < > SH + K1 andK1
SH + > P K2
Rate =
d[P ]
dt
= K2 [SH + ]
K=
d[P ]
dt
[SH + ]
[S][H + ]
= K2 K[S][H + ]
5.2
here the upper line is strong electrolyte and the other curve is for weak
electrolytes.
]
+
in the equation for SAC - d[P
dt = K2 K[S][H ]
+
the conc. of H means the conc. of protonated solvent like H3 O+ and not H +
itself.
5.3
SAC only depends on the protnated solvent but the GAC depends on H + conc.
as well as undissolved acids.