JJ614 PROJECT 2

OBSERVATION FORM (40%)

(Evaluation by Project's Supervisor)

A. PROJECT SELECTION AND CLASSIFICATION

NO

CRITERIA

A Research

CLO
1

Industrial
Requirement

Student did significant research

and it is entirely in their own words.
Student demonstrates a deep
understanding of their project.

Student did a lot of research

and it is presented in their own
words. Student shows a clear
understanding of their project.

Student did inediquate research. Student

does not understand their own project.

Meet industrial requirement.

Meet industrial requirement but

need some improvement.

Does not meet industrial requirement.

Students shows some successful

fulfillment of ideas and concept.

Students concept can not be

fully made to the viewer or not
fully clear.

Student's concept is not evident at all or

unclear.

Ideas and Concept

SCORE
3

B. PROJECT PLANNING
NO

CRITERIA

CLO

SCORE
3

Provides a detailed breakdown of

tasks. Task are specific to the
project and encompass active
design as well as course.

Tasks are listed, but could use

more detail. Key task may be
ommited.

Task list are vague, incomplete, or too

closely associated with course
deliverables to accurately describe and
guide design work.

Timeline and time estimates are

realistic and reflect course
deadlines. Timeline spans the
length of project.

Timeline or time estimates

occasionally veer from reality
or are too closely tied to coyrse
deadlines.

Timeline or time estimates are

unrealistic, inflated or inaccurate. Grader
doubts project will track the way the chart
predicts.

Must remind to keep on-task

Rarely focuses on the task and what

needs to be done

A Gantt-chart

B Time Management

Focus on Task
3

Consistently stays focused on the

task and what needs to be done

C. PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION
NO

CRITERIA

CLO

A Technical Skill
2
B Teamwork
3

SCORE
3

Demonstrates excellent and

correct methods for handling
engineering equiptment.
Excellence knowledge of safety
rules.
Consistently worked together as a
well-coordinated team; divided
large task into a number of smaller
tasks; smaller tasks were assigned
to team members; team members
pulled their own share.

Sometimes shows a good

knowledge for handling
engineering equipment
equipment and safety rules.

Lack knowledge of the usage of

engineering equipment and safety rules.

Usually worked together as a

well-coordinated team; usually
divided large task into a
number of smaller tasks;
smaller tasks were usually
assigned to team members;
team members pulled their own

Team did not work together and

effectively split up tasks. Outside
intervention was needed to help split up
work; team members did not pull their
own share.

PROJECT TITLE
PROGRAMME
NO

REG. NO

NAME

03DKM11F2013
03DKM11F2050
03DKM11F2028
03DKM11F2020
03DKM11F2022

FAIQ RUSYDI BIN IDRIS

MUHAMMAD B. FAIZ BAFANA
AZRUL AIMAN B. ROSLI
SAIFUL AMIRUL B. MOHD ROSLI
MOHAMAD KHAIRUDDIN B. ABDUL KARIM

2
3
4
5
6

Evaluate By:

( SHAIFUL ZAMRI BIN ABDUL SATTAR )

SELECTION & CLASSIFICATION

A
4
4
4
4
4

B
4
4
4
4
4

C
4
4
4
4
4

PLANNING

A
4
4
4
4
4

B
4
4
4
4
4

IMPLEMENTATION

C
4
4
4
4
4

A
4
4
4
4
4

B
4
4
4
4
4

TOTAL
40%

32
32
32
32
32

JJ614 PROJECT 2
INDIVIDUAL PRESENTATION FORM (50%)
(Evaluation by Department's Representative)

NO

CRITERIA

SCORE

CLO

INDIVIDUAL

Non Verbal Skills

Excellent

Good

Average

9-10

6-8

3-5

Weak
0-2

A Eye Contact

Student maintains eye contact

with audience, seldom returning to notes.

Student maintains eye contact

most of the time but frequently
returns to notes.

Student occasionally uses eye

contact, but still reads mostly
from notes.

Student makes no eye contact

and only reads from notes.

B Facial
Expressions

Gives audience clues to what the content

of speech is about; Appropriate
expression, never notice a deadpan or
conflicting
expression

Occasionally demonstrates
either a deadpan OR
conflicting expression during
presentation

Occasionally displays both a

deadpan and conflicting
expression during
presentation

Has either a deadpan

expression of shows a
conflicting expression during
entire presentation

C Gestures

Natural hand gestures are demonstrated

Vocal Skills

9-10

No gestures are notices

6-8

3-5

0-2

D Enthusiasm

Demonstrates a strong
positive feeling about topic
during entire presentation

Occasionally shows positive

feelings about topic

Shows some negativity

toward topic presented

Shows absolutely no interest in

topic presented

E Verbal
Techniques

Student uses a clear voice and

correct, precise pronunciation
of terms so that all audience
members can hear
presentation.

Student's voice is clear.

Student pronounces most
words correctly. Most
audience members can hear
presentation.

Student's voice is low.

Student incorrectly
pronounces terms. Audience
members have difficulty
hearing presentation.

Student mumbles, incorrectly

pronounces terms, and speaks
too quietly for audience in the
back of class to hear.

PROJECT TITLE
PROGRAMME
CRITERIA

CRITERIA

TOTAL
30%

TOTAL
20%

B
7

19

14

19

14

F2028

19

14

F2020

20

14

F2022

18

14

NO

REG. NO

F2013

F2050

NAME

Evaluated By:

( Panel's Name )

JJ614 PROJECT 2
GROUP PRESENTATION FORM (50%)
(Evaluation by Department's Representative)

PROJECT TITLE
PROGRAMME
NO

CRITERIA

SCORE

CLO

Content
A

GROUP

Use of
Technology

Visual Aids

Demonstration

Subject
Knowledge

Teamwork

Excellent

Good

Average

Week

9-10

6-8

3-5

0-2

MARKS

Uses technology as a highly

effective tool.

Technology enhances the

message

Uses technology to some

extent to demonstrate the
groups position.

Does not use technology in a

persuasive manner

Student's visual aids explain and

reinforce the presentation. Visual aid
enhances presentation, all thoughts
articulated and keeps interest

Student's visual aids relate to

the presentation. Thoughts
articulated clearly, but not
engaging

Student occasionally uses visual

aids that rarely support the
presentation. Adds nothing to
presentation

Student uses superfluous visual aids

or no visual aids. Poor, distracts
audience and is hard to read

Students are able to operate the

machine properly and efficiently.
Always practice safety precautions.
Machine works well and meet all the
objectives

Students are able to operate the

machine properly. Practice safety
precautions most of the times.
Machine works well and meet the
objectives

Students unable to operate the

machine with safety precautions.
Machine is not work properly and
fail to meet some of the
objectives

Students unable to operate the

machine with safety precaution.
Machine is not work and fail to
achieve the objectives

Student demonstrates full

knowledge (more than
required) by answering all
class questions with
explanations and elaboration.

Student is at ease and

answers most questions with
explanations and some
elaboration.

Student is uncomfortable with

information and is able to answer
only rudimentary questions, but
fails to elaborate.

Student does not have grasp

of information; student cannot
answer questions about
subject.

Works as a cohesive unit to

make the presentation

Works as a group to make the

presentation

Works together to make the

presentation

Does not work together to

make presentation

( Panel's Name )

5
TOTAL

Evaluated By:

22

JJ614 PROJECT 2
PROJECT REPORT FORM (40%)
(Evaluation by Project's Supervisor)

PROJECT TITLE
PROGRAMME
NO
A

CRITERIA

CLO

Introduction

Good

Average

Week

2-3

Able to explain the proposed project clearly.

Unable to explain the proposed project clearly.

MARKS

Uncertain about the proposed project.

4
B

Problem Statement

Objectives

Problem statement clearly defined.

Unsure of the problem statement.

Unable to state the problem statement which

requires the project's need.

Main objective clearly stated, supported by subMain objectives clearly stated, inadequate sub-objectives.
objectives. Applying suitable verbs. Objective(s) is Inaccurate verbs used. Objectives cannot be measured.
measurerable.

The main objectives and sub-objectives are not

clear, the objective cannot be measured. Wrongly
used verbs.

Scope

Suitable for 16 weeks period.

Unsuitable for 16 weeks period.

Too general.

Literature

Clearly researched with strong proof.

No proof that research was done.

Explaination made is too general.

4
3

Methodology

Relating methodology with project work.

Lack of methodology relationship with project work.

No linkage between methodology and project work.

4
G

Importance of
Project

Clear

Unclear

Not stated.

Conclusion

Clear

Unclear

Not stated.

Planning

There are linkage between the methodology and

schedule planning.

No linkage between methodology and schedule planning.

Doesn't illustrate the project's flow.

Complying APA standard.

Doesn't comply with APA standard.

References

4
3

None

3
TOTAL
Evaluate By:

Supervisor's Name

35