Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Master Plan
December 2006
Submitted by: HNTB Corporation
in association with Cooper and Gardner Architects and Unified Industries Incorporated
1.1
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
1.6.1
1.6.2
1.6.3
1.6.4
1.6.5
1.7
1.7.1
1.7.2
1.7.3
1.7.4
1.8
1.8.1
1.8.2
1.8.3
1.8.4
1.8.5
1.8.6
1.9
1.10
1.11
1.12
1.13
1.14
1.15
1.16
1.17
1.18
1.19
1.20
1.20.1
1.20.2
1.20.3
1.20.4
1.20.5
1.21
1.21.1
INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................................................. 1-1
AIRSPACE MANAGEMENT ................................................................................................................ 1-1
DELEGATION OF AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL RESPONSIBILITIES ................................................. 1-2
EN ROUTE NAVIGATION AIDS ........................................................................................................ 1-2
LOCAL AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL PROCEDURES............................................................................. 1-2
AIRFIELD ............................................................................................................................................... 1-3
Runway.........................................................................................................................................................................1-3
Taxiways.......................................................................................................................................................................1-3
Aprons..........................................................................................................................................................................1-4
Landing Navigational Aids........................................................................................................................................1-4
Imaginary Surfaces and Obstructions......................................................................................................................1-6
PASSENGER TERMINAL BUILDING ................................................................................................. 1-6
Overview and Recent Construction History...........................................................................................................1-6
Ground Floor Level ....................................................................................................................................................1-6
First Floor Level ....................................................................................................................................................... 1-10
Building Services...................................................................................................................................................... 1-11
ACCESS, CIRCULATION AND PARKING....................................................................................... 1-11
Access ........................................................................................................................................................................ 1-11
On-Airport Circulation .......................................................................................................................................... 1-12
Traffic Volumes ....................................................................................................................................................... 1-13
Curbside Activity ..................................................................................................................................................... 1-13
Public Parking .......................................................................................................................................................... 1-13
Other Parking........................................................................................................................................................... 1-14
EXECUTIVE JET FACILITY............................................................................................................... 1-15
FORMER NATO FACILITY................................................................................................................ 1-15
AIR CARGO SHED .............................................................................................................................. 1-15
COURIER BUILDING ......................................................................................................................... 1-15
FORMER HELICOPTER BUILDING ................................................................................................. 1-16
ARFF FACILITY .................................................................................................................................. 1-16
BERMUDA POST OFFICE FACILITY ............................................................................................... 1-16
ASB/BAS WORKSHOP BUILDING ................................................................................................... 1-16
CATERING BUILDING ...................................................................................................................... 1-18
DAO MAINTENANCE FACILITY ..................................................................................................... 1-18
FUEL STORAGE/ DISTRIBUTION.................................................................................................... 1-18
UTILITIES ............................................................................................................................................ 1-18
Electric....................................................................................................................................................................... 1-18
Water ......................................................................................................................................................................... 1-18
Sanitary Sewage........................................................................................................................................................ 1-19
Communications ..................................................................................................................................................... 1-19
Stormwater ............................................................................................................................................................... 1-19
OFF-AIRPORT FACILITIES ............................................................................................................... 1-19
Air Traffic Control Tower ...................................................................................................................................... 1-19
Page
Bermuda Weather Service/Ground Electronics Building.................................................................................. 1-19
BAS-Serco Offices.................................................................................................................................................... 1-19
ENVIRONMENTAL INVENTORY .................................................................................................... 1-20
Study Area................................................................................................................................................................. 1-20
Land Use Plans, Projects and Programs ............................................................................................................... 1-20
Airport Lands ........................................................................................................................................................... 1-21
Lands Surrounding Airport.................................................................................................................................... 1-21
Fresh Water Lens ..................................................................................................................................................... 1-22
Geology ..................................................................................................................................................................... 1-22
Terrestrial Habitat ................................................................................................................................................... 1-23
Marine Habitat......................................................................................................................................................... 1-25
Water Testing ........................................................................................................................................................... 1-28
Air Testing ................................................................................................................................................................ 1-28
Noise Studies ............................................................................................................................................................ 1-29
KEY ISSUES.......................................................................................................................................... 1-29
Non-Conforming Design Standards..................................................................................................................... 1-29
Terminal Development........................................................................................................................................... 1-29
Airport Building Asset Reuse................................................................................................................................. 1-30
Land Use Compatibility.......................................................................................................................................... 1-30
2.
2.1
2.2
2.2.1
2.2.2
2.2.3
2.2.4
2.3
2.3.1
2.3.2
2.3.3
2.3.4
2.3.5
2.3.6
2.3.7
2.3.8
2.3.9
2.3.10
2.4
2.4.1
2.4.2
INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................................................. 2-1
HISTORICAL ACTIVITY ..................................................................................................................... 2-1
Passengers ....................................................................................................................................................................2-1
Operations ...................................................................................................................................................................2-3
Air Service....................................................................................................................................................................2-3
Cargo ............................................................................................................................................................................2-7
BASE FORECAST .................................................................................................................................. 2-7
General Forecast Assumptions .................................................................................................................................2-7
Scheduled Passenger Forecast...................................................................................................................................2-8
Load Factor and Seat Departure Forecast ............................................................................................................ 2-12
Scheduled Passenger Carrier Operations and Fleet Mix.................................................................................... 2-12
General Aviation...................................................................................................................................................... 2-16
Cargo ......................................................................................................................................................................... 2-20
Military...................................................................................................................................................................... 2-22
Charter ...................................................................................................................................................................... 2-22
Summary of Base Forecast...................................................................................................................................... 2-23
Derivative Base Forecast ......................................................................................................................................... 2-23
ALTERNATIVE FORECAST SCENARIOS ........................................................................................ 2-23
High Forecast Scenario ........................................................................................................................................... 2-26
Low Forecast Scenario............................................................................................................................................. 2-27
ii
Page
FACILITY REQUIREMENTS................................................................................................................ 3-1
3.1
3.2
3.2.1
3.2.2
3.3
3.3.1
3.3.2
3.3.3
3.4
3.4.1
3.4.2
3.4.3
3.4.4
3.4.5
3.4.6
3.4.7
3.4.8
3.4.9
3.4.10
3.4.11
3.4.12
3.5
3.5.1
3.5.2
3.5.3
3.5.4
3.6
3.6.1
3.6.2
3.6.3
3.7
3.8
3.8.1
3.8.2
3.8.3
3.8.4
3.9
3.9.1
3.9.2
3.9.3
3.10
3.11
3.12
INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................................................. 3-1
DESIGN CRITERIA ............................................................................................................................... 3-1
ICAO Aerodrome Reference Code ..........................................................................................................................3-2
Approach Minimums.................................................................................................................................................3-2
AIRFIELD CAPACITY REQUIREMENTS ........................................................................................... 3-5
Factors Affecting Airfield Capacity..........................................................................................................................3-5
Determining BDA Airfield Capacity .......................................................................................................................3-8
Airfield Delay ..............................................................................................................................................................3-9
AIRFIELD REQUIREMENTS................................................................................................................ 3-9
New Runways ..............................................................................................................................................................3-9
Runway Length ........................................................................................................................................................ 3-14
Runway Width ......................................................................................................................................................... 3-15
Runway Strength...................................................................................................................................................... 3-15
Runway Shoulders ................................................................................................................................................... 3-17
Runway Strips........................................................................................................................................................... 3-17
Runway Blast Pads................................................................................................................................................... 3-17
Runway End Safety Areas....................................................................................................................................... 3-19
Clearways .................................................................................................................................................................. 3-19
Stopways.................................................................................................................................................................... 3-19
Taxiway Requirements............................................................................................................................................ 3-19
NAVAIDs ................................................................................................................................................................. 3-21
TERMINAL AND CONCOURSE REQUIREMENTS ........................................................................ 3-22
Demand Levels and Planning Factors .................................................................................................................. 3-22
Facility Requirements.............................................................................................................................................. 3-28
Aircraft Gate Requirements ................................................................................................................................... 3-35
Summary................................................................................................................................................................... 3-36
SURFACE TRANSPORTATION AND PARKING REQUIREMENTS ............................................. 3-36
Airport Access and Circulation ............................................................................................................................. 3-36
Terminal Curbside................................................................................................................................................... 3-38
Parking Requirements............................................................................................................................................. 3-38
AIR CARGO ......................................................................................................................................... 3-41
GENERAL AVIATION FACILITIES .................................................................................................. 3-43
GA Terminal............................................................................................................................................................. 3-43
GA Apron Requirements........................................................................................................................................ 3-45
GA Hangar Requirements ...................................................................................................................................... 3-45
Total GA Site Requirements................................................................................................................................... 3-45
SUPPORT FACILITIES ....................................................................................................................... 3-45
Maintenance Facilities ............................................................................................................................................ 3-45
Fuel Storage Facilities.............................................................................................................................................. 3-45
ARFF Facilities ......................................................................................................................................................... 3-46
USEFUL LIFE ANALYSIS ................................................................................................................... 3-48
UTILITIES ............................................................................................................................................ 3-48
STORM SURGE PROTECTION ......................................................................................................... 3-50
iii
Page
CONCEPTS ............................................................................................................................................ 4-1
4.1
4.2
4.3
4.4
4.4.1
4.4.2
4.4.3
4.4.4
4.5
4.5.1
4.5.2
4.5.3
4.6
4.6.1
4.6.2
4.7
INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................................................. 4-1
OPPORTUNITIES AND CONSTRAINTS ........................................................................................... 4-1
OVERALL PLANNING STRATEGY .................................................................................................... 4-2
NEW TERMINAL DEVELOPMENT ANALYSIS ................................................................................ 4-2
Screening Initial Sites .................................................................................................................................................4-2
Evaluation of New Terminal Sites ............................................................................................................................4-2
Replacement Terminal Configuration Analysis.....................................................................................................4-8
Other Airport Facilities Development Concepts ................................................................................................ 4-13
REDEVELOPMENT OF EXISTING TERMINAL .............................................................................. 4-14
Preliminary Onsite Redevelopment Strategies .................................................................................................... 4-15
Layout and General Phasing Plan for Redeveloped Terminal at Existing Site ............................................... 4-15
Concepts for Other Airport Facilities for Redeveloped Terminal at Existing Site......................................... 4-17
EVALUATION OF TERMINAL DEVELOPMENT CONCEPTS ...................................................... 4-17
Evaluation Criteria .................................................................................................................................................. 4-17
Terminal Development Options Evaluation........................................................................................................ 4-19
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION ......................................................................................... 4-25
5.
5.1
5.2
5.3
5.4
5.4.1
5.4.2
5.4.3
5.4.4
5.4.5
5.5
5.6
5.6.1
5.6.2
5.6.3
5.6.4
INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................................................. 5-1
OVERALL DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY............................................................................................ 5-1
ON-AIRPORT LAND USE .................................................................................................................... 5-1
AIRPORT DEVELOPMENT PLAN ...................................................................................................... 5-2
Airfield..........................................................................................................................................................................5-2
Terminal Area .............................................................................................................................................................5-5
Air Cargo......................................................................................................................................................................5-6
General Aviation.........................................................................................................................................................5-6
Support Facilities ........................................................................................................................................................5-6
PRELIMINARY COST AND PHASING ............................................................................................... 5-7
OFF-AIRPORT LAND USE RECOMMENDATIONS ......................................................................... 5-8
Background............................................................................................................................................................... 5-11
Noise Metrics and Modelling................................................................................................................................. 5-11
Results of Noise Analysis ........................................................................................................................................ 5-11
Recommended Off-Airport Land Use Compatibility ........................................................................................ 5-13
6.
6.1
6.2
6.2.1
6.2.2
6.2.3
6.2.4
INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................................................. 6-1
BENEFIT COST ANALYSIS .................................................................................................................. 6-1
Revenue Enhancement Assumptions ......................................................................................................................6-2
Alternative Funding Sources.....................................................................................................................................6-4
Projected Benefits .......................................................................................................................................................6-4
Cost Calculations ..................................................................................................................................................... 6-11
iv
Page
Benefit Scenarios...................................................................................................................................................... 6-11
PROJECT DELIVERY OPTIONS........................................................................................................ 6-16
Design, Bid, Build, Operate .................................................................................................................................... 6-16
Agency Construction Manager (CM-at-Fee) ...................................................................................................... 6-17
Construction Manager at Risk ............................................................................................................................... 6-17
Design-Build............................................................................................................................................................. 6-18
Build-Operate-Transfer (BOT).............................................................................................................................. 6-19
Conclusion................................................................................................................................................................ 6-19
REVENUE ENHANCEMENT STRATEGIES ..................................................................................... 6-19
Overnight Aircraft Parking Fees............................................................................................................................ 6-20
Consulting Activities............................................................................................................................................... 6-20
Ground Handling .................................................................................................................................................... 6-20
Reuse of Existing Departures Hall......................................................................................................................... 6-20
High-End FBO ......................................................................................................................................................... 6-20
Seek One-Way Cruise ............................................................................................................................................. 6-21
Other Energy Efficiencies ....................................................................................................................................... 6-21
Table 1.1
Table 1.2
Table 1.3
Table 1.4
Table 2.1
Table 2.2
Table 2.3
Table 2.4
Table 2.5
Table 2.6
Table 2.7
Table 2.8
Table 2.9
Table 2.10
Table 2.11
Table 2.12
Table 2.13
Table 2.14
Table 2.15
Table 3.1
Table 3.2
Table 3.3
Table 3.4
Table 3.5
Table 3.6
Table 3.7
Table 3.8
Table 3.9
Table 3.10
Table 3.11
Table 3.12
Table 3.13
Table 3.14
Table 3.15
Table 3.16
Table 3.17
Table 3.18
Table 3.19
Table 3.20
Table 3.21
Table 4.1
Page
vi
Page
Terminal Evaluation........................................................................................................................................ 4-20
CIP Recommended Development Plan Cost in 2006 Dollars ......................................................................5-9
Noise Contour Area......................................................................................................................................... 5-12
Land Use Noise Sensitivity Matrix ................................................................................................................ 5-14
Recommended Land Use Controls for Residential Development............................................................ 5-15
Potential Revenue Enhancement Sources .......................................................................................................6-3
Potential Alternative Funding Sources/Revenue Impacts ............................................................................6-5
Revenue Enhancement Cash Flows - Base Forecast ......................................................................................6-7
Visitor's Share of Total Enplanements.............................................................................................................6-8
Air Visitor Expenditures per Total Visitor Deplanement - High Forecast Scenario................................6-9
Air Visitor Expenditures per Total Visitor Deplanement - Base Forecast Scenario.............................. 6-10
Projected Additional Visitor Expenditures in Constant 2010 Dollars attributable to High Forecast
Scenario ............................................................................................................................................................. 6-12
Discounted Marginal Benefits - High Forecast Scenario versus Low Forecast Scenario ...................... 6-13
Benefit Cost Scenarios - Terminal Only Cost Calculations ....................................................................... 6-14
Benefit Cost Scenarios - Terminal Only Benefit Scenarios........................................................................ 6-15
vii
Figure
Figure 1-1
Figure 1-2
Figure 1-3
Figure 1-4
Figure 1-5
Figure 1-6
Figure 1-7
Figure 1-8
Figure 1-9
Figure 2-1
Figure 2-2
Figure 2-3
Figure 3-1
Figure 3-2
Figure 3-3
Figure 3-4
Figure 4-1
Figure 4-2
Figure 4-3
Figure 4-4
Figure 4-5
Figure 4-6
Figure 4-7
Figure 4-8
Figure 4-9
Figure 4-10
Figure 5-1
Figure 5-2
Figure 5-3
Figure 5-4
Figure 5-5
Figure 5-6
Figure 5-7
Figure 5-8
Figure 6-1
viii
Master Plan
Chapter One
INVENTORY OF EXISTING CONDITIONS
1.1
INTRODUCTION
1.2
AIRSPACE MANAGEMENT
UN
ITE
D
ST
A
TE
S
Norfolk/VA Beach
AT
0
N
LA
A
CE
IC
Miles
100 200 300
Saint
George
BERMUDA
Bermuda
International
Airport
A T L A N T I C
O C E A N
CASTLE
HARBOUR
HARRINGTON
SOUND
Flatts
Village
Somerset
GREAT
SOUND
HAMILTON
Miles
0
0
Figure 1-1
1
2
3
Kilometres
1.3
Master Plan
DELEGATION OF AIR
TRAFFIC CONTROL
RESPONSIBILITIES
1.5
1.4
EN ROUTE NAVIGATION
AIDS
Master Plan
1.6
AIRFIELD
Runway
Taxiways
1-3
Master Plan
1.6.3
1.6.4
Aprons
1-4
Category I ILS/DMERunway 30
(minimums: 257-foot ceiling and mile visibility);
Master Plan
Table 1.1
Runway Marking, Lighting, and NAVAIDS
Runway 12-30
True Bearing
12
30
Length (Ft.)
9,713
Width (Ft.)
150
Surface
Concrete/Asphalt
PCN 80/F/A/W/U
(No tire restriction in effect)
11.0
12.0
Effective Gradient
0.0%
0.0%
207 x 150
553 x 150
950 x 500
553 x 500
9,713
10,663
9,920
9,713
9,713
10,266
10,266
9,713
Non-precision Instrument
Precision Instrument
VOR/DME
Declared Distances
Take-off Run Available (TORA) (Ft.)
Take-off Distance Avail. (TODA) (Ft.)
Accel/Stop Dist. Avail. (ASDA) (Ft.)
Landing Dist. Avail. (LDA) (Ft.)
Marking
Lighting
- Approach
- Runway edge
NAVAIDS
VOR/DME
Source: Dept. of Civil Aviation Aeronautical Information Publication (2001) & Jeppesen Sanderson, Inc. (2005).
1-5
visibility,
speed);
depending
Master Plan
on
approach
VOR/DMERunway 12 (minimums
449-foot ceiling and 1-mile to 1--mile
visibility, depending on approach
speed); and
VOR/DMERunway 30 (minimums
468-foot ceiling and -mile to 1--mile
visibility, depending on approach
speed).
1.6.5
1.7
1.7.2
PASSENGER TERMINAL
BUILDING
Master Plan
Table 1.2
Approach Obstructions
Description
Horiz. Dist.
from Runway
Threshold
Horiz. Dist.
from Runway
Centreline
Highest Point
of Elevation
(Ft. MSL)
Height Above
Runway Horiz.
Plane
50
82
105
65
95
80
126
136
90
40
72
95
55
85
70
116
126
80
35
35
40
40
47
40
40
60
25
25
30
30
37
30
30
50
Runway 12 Obstructios
Hill
Hill
Building
Building
Hill
Building
Hill & Mast (Lit)
Hill & Mast (Lit)
Hill
1,950
2,600
2,600
2,700
3,000
3,200-3,650
3,650
3,950
4,850
550 Left
300 Left
300 Left
150 Left
700 Left
200-500 Right
200 Right
200 Right
1,050 Right
Runway 30 Obstructions
Group of 3 Bdgs
Building
Hill
Hill
Building
Hill
Hill
Building
1,550
1,850
1,850
2,250
3,000
3,550
3,550
3,650
550 Right
350 Right
650 Right
600 Right
705 Right
700 Right
700 Right
700 Right
1-7
Master Plan
Table 1.3
Passenger Terminal Area by Function
Existing
Space
Terminal Component
Airline Functions
Ticket Counter
Ticket Counter Positions - 40
Ticket Counter - SF
Ticket Counter - LF
Ticket Counter Process & Queuing
Airline Areas
Operations
Maintenance
Storage
Ramp Area
Departure Lounge
Baggage Claim (SF)
Baggage Claim (LF)
No. of Devices - 3
Pct. Of
Total
22,495 sf
9.5%
22,495 sf
247 lf
9.5%
18,107 sf
10,145 sf
2,606 sf
2,177 sf
3,179 sf
19,284 sf
10,284 sf
354 lf
0.0%
7.7%
4.3%
1.1%
0.9%
1.3%
8.2%
4.4%
19,962 sf
562 lf
3,499 sf
6,536 sf
567 sf
100,734 sf
8.4%
0.2%
1.5%
2.8%
0.2%
42.6%
4,636 sf
9,746 sf
2,387 sf
4,197 sf
20,966 sf
2.0%
4.1%
1.0%
1.8%
8.9%
1,431 sf
749 sf
683 sf
532 sf
12,835 sf
14,798 sf
0.6%
0.3%
0.3%
0.2%
5.4%
6.3%
3,239 sf
18,792 sf
494 sf
22,525 sf
1.4%
8.0%
0.2%
9.5%
21,984 sf
4,306 sf
11,678 sf
6,000 sf
21,601 sf
14,834 sf
4,023 sf
2,744 sf
43,585 sf
9.3%
1.8%
4.9%
2.5%
9.1%
6.3%
1.7%
1.2%
18.4%
10,759 sf
14,989 sf
506 sf
883 sf
1,815 sf
4,760 sf
2,079 sf
1,782 sf
0 sf
899 sf
33,712 sf
4.6%
6.3%
0.2%
0.4%
0.8%
2.0%
0.9%
0.8%
0.0%
0.4%
14.3%
236,321 sf
100.0%
Non-Public Area
Circulation
Airport Administration
Miscellaneous
Maintenance
Police (Substation)
Building Systems
Mechanical
Electrical
Fire Control/P
IT/Spec. Systems
Subtotal Non Public
1-8
Master Plan
Immigration Arrivals
Master Plan
1.7.3
1-10
Master Plan
Telecommunications
The telephone system at BDA is a Voiceover-IP (VoIP) solution manufactured by
Nortel Network that utilises fibre optic
cabling for interconnecting between
distribution hubs throughout the Airport.
The network handles the Airports voice,
data,
and
wireless
communications
requirements. The system, installed in 2005,
was initially configured to support up to 200
telephones in a multi-tenant configuration
and has the capacity to be upgraded to
support over 1,500 users.
1.8
ACCESS, CIRCULATION
AND PARKING
Building Services
1.8.1
Access
Electrical
The existing terminal building power
service is provided by the Bermuda Electric
Light Company to 750 and 500 KVA
transformers located on the west end of the
site. The Airport maintains two emergency
1-11
Master Plan
1.8.2
On-Airport Circulation
1.8.3
Master Plan
Traffic Volumes
Curbside Activity
1.8.5
Public Parking
1-13
Master Plan
Long-term/
Overflow:
Occupancy1
(percent)
Capacity
Short-Term
19%
75
Long-Term
72%
107
22%
502
Curb parking
55%
203
Total
45%
252
Overflow
1.8.6
Other Parking
1-14
Master Plan
1.9
Master Plan
Master Plan
Table 1.4
Inventory of ARFF Vehicles
Bumper Turret Roof Turret
Discharge Rate Discharge Rate
(GPM)
(GPM)
Year
Oshkosh T-3000
1995 (3)
3,000
420
500
2,000
300
600/1,250
Oshkosh T-1500
2003
1,500
210
750
1,520
300
375 / 750
2000
Citroen Dispatch
2001
1-17
PKP (2)
(Pounds)
Pump
Capacity
(GPM)
No. of
Vehicles
Vehicle
Water
(Gallons)
Capacities
AFFF (1)
(Gallons)
Master Plan
1.20 UTILITIES
Figure 1-6 shows the general location of
utilities. Following is a description of
existing utilities serving the Airport.
1.20.1
Electric
1.20.2
Water
Master Plan
Sanitary Sewage
Communications
1.21.2
Bermuda Weather
Service/Ground Electronics
Building
Stormwater
1.21.3
BAS-Serco Offices
Master Plan
1.22 ENVIRONMENTAL
INVENTORY
Study Area
by
1-20
Master Plan
North
The majority of the land to the north of
the Airport is also part of the former U.S.
NAS. This land is known as Southside and
falls under the jurisdiction of the Bermuda
Land Development Company (BLDC).
Airport Lands
East
Master Plan
South
The majority of the southern boundary
of the Airport land comprises the waters of
Castle Harbour.
The unused runway
protrudes into Castle Harbour and is
designated Landbank.
West
The lands to the west of the Airport abut
the public road known as Kindley Field
Road. The land and rocky coast located in
between Kindley Field Road and the waters
of Ferry Reach are designated National Park.
1.22.5
Geology
4
1.22.7
Master Plan
Terrestrial Habitat
Rocky Coastal
The Rocky Coastal habitat exists at
Nonsuch Island and Coopers Island. This is
the area between mean high tide and Upland
Coastal and is characterised by cliffs, rock
outcrops and little soil.
1-23
Feet 0
Metres 0
Study Area
Figure 1-7
Terrestrial Habitats
600
200
1200
400
Master Plan
Upland Hillside
The Upland Hillside habitat comprises a
significant part of Coopers Island, and there
are pockets of this habitat on the northeast
side of the Study Area (see Figure 1-7).
Although this habitat contains pockets of
native vegetation, including the Bermuda
Cedar, Palmetto, Olivewood, White Stopper,
Jamaica Dogwood, Hackberry, and the
Bermuda Snowberry, the invasive Brazil
Pepper, Casuarina, Fiddlewood, and Jumbie
Bean dominate.
Salt Marsh
and
1-24
Master Plan
Marine Habitat
Turtles
Seagrass Beds
Seagrass are marine flowering plants and
are recognised as extremely productive
ecological systems. Seagrass beds support
marine organisms and are a habitat for
many species. In addition to supporting the
Spiny Lobster and such fish as Yellowtail
Snapper, Grey Snapper, Hogfish, Tarpon,
and Bonefish, the seagrass beds serve as
feeding grounds for the Queen Conch and
immature Green Turtles.
Queen Conch
The Queen Conch was once abundant in
Bermuda but was over harvested. In 1978
they were afforded protection by the
Fisheries (Protected Species) Order 1978.
1-25
and
Feet 0
Metres 0
Study Area
Figure 1-8
Marine Habitats
600
200
1200
400
Master Plan
Coral Reefs
Bermudas coral reefs are considered to
be in excellent condition; however,
Bermudas northerly location, geographic
isolation and dense population (and
subsequent pollution in the sea) are all
factors that put Bermudas reefs in a very
high risk category.
2005.
1-26
Agaricia fragilis
Diploria labyrinthiformis
Feet 0
Metres 0
Study Area
Figure 1-9
600
200
1200
400
Diploria strigosa
Favia fragum
Isophylllia sinosa
Madracis decactis
Madracis mirabilis
Meandrina meandrites
Millipora alcicornis
Montastrea cavernosa
Montastrea faveolata
Montastrea frankesi
Oculina diffusa
Oculina robusta
Porites astreoides
Porites porites
Scolymia cubensis
Siderastrea radians
Siderasrea sidereal
Stephanocoenia michilinial.
Master Plan
Intertidal Zone
Mangroves
1-27
Master Plan
Water Testing
Air Testing
1-28
1.22.11
Master Plan
Noise Studies
Non-Conforming Design
Standards
Terminal Development
1-29
Master Plan
associated with
occupation.
preparing
them
for
1-30
Master Plan
Chapter Two
AVIATION ACTIVITY FORECAST
Passenger enplanements,
2.2
2.2.1
2.1
INTRODUCTION
HISTORICAL ACTIVITY
Passengers
11
2-1
Master Plan
Table 2.1
Historic Enplanements and Visitors
Year
Resident Air
Passengers (1)
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
167,197
143,341
111,964
109,146
103,997
113,999
115,687
125,480
111,671
125,601
132,991
132,181
139,747
147,677
149,700
-0.8%
434,909
386,178
375,231
413,134
416,990
387,625
391,450
380,790
369,971
354,815
332,191
278,153
284,024
256,576
271,617
-3.3%
Percentage
Visitors
Total
Enplanements (3)
72.2%
72.9%
77.0%
79.1%
80.0%
77.3%
77.2%
75.2%
76.8%
73.9%
71.4%
67.8%
67.0%
63.5%
64.5%
602,106
529,519
487,195
522,280
520,987
501,624
507,137
506,270
481,642
480,416
465,182
410,334
423,771
404,253
421,317
-0.8%
-2.5%
Notes: (1) Figures from 1990 -1996 are from Figure 2-2 in the Bermuda International Airport Draft
Land Use Plan (November 1995), ACI-NA and Bermuda Digest of Statistics, 2000.
Figures for 1997-2004 are from Airport statistics.
(2) Bermuda Department of Tourism. Includes business and leisure visitors to Bermuda
that arrived by air. Does not include Bermuda residents that travelled by air.
(3) Enplanements minus air visitors.
Sources: As noted and HNTB analysis.
2-2
650
600
550
500
Total
450
400
Visitors
350
300
250
200
150
Residents
100
50
0
1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004
Figure 2-1
Master Plan
2.2.3
The rise in the percentage of resident
travel in recent years is likely attributable to
a shift in the Bermuda economy. In the
early 1990s, tourism was the leading
industry in Bermuda, but over the last
decade
international
business
has
supplanted tourism as the number one
industry.
According to the Bermuda
Department of Statistics, international
business activity accounted for almost 21
percent of Bermudas GDP in 2003, up from
about 14 percent in 1998. Over the same
time
period,
employment
in
the
international business sector jumped about
38 percent while employment in the hotel
industry dropped by almost 28 percent. The
drop in tourist-related air arrivals is
attributed to a combination of factors,
including the high cost of airfare to
Bermuda, the high cost of staying in
Bermuda, growth in cruise ships as
alternative mode of leisure travel, a lack of
consumer awareness of Bermuda as a
vacation destination, and competition from
Caribbean destinations.
2.2.2
Air Service
Operations
Master Plan
Table 2.2
Historic Aircraft Operations by Category
Year
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004 (4)
Avg. Annual Growth
1994-2004
Scheduled
Passenger
Carrier (1)
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
7,774
7,975
8,242
7,521
7,233
7,318
8,010
6,990
6,860
7,042
8,318
0.7%
General
Aviation (2)
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
2,534
3,151
3,199
3,488
3,574
3,440
3,718
3,756
5,224
5,152
5,241
Military
Cargo
Charter
Total (3)
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
276
240
236
270
248
283
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
744
N/A
972
1,340
1,428
1,390
630
546
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
188
200
100
150
68
186
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
10,308
11,126
11,441
11,753
10,807
12,194
13,508
12,510
13,894
13,140
14,574
7.5%
3.5%
Notes: (1) Data for 1999-2004 is from Airport statistics. Data for 1994-1998 & 2004 is from OAG multiplied by a 99.1%
completion factor. The 99.1% completion factor reflects the average completion rate for 1999, 2000, and 2002.
The years 2001 and 2003 were omitted from completion rate average because of the flight interruptions after
the Sept. 11th terrorist attacks in 2001 and Hurricane Fabian in 2003.
(2) Data for 1996-2004 is from Airport statistics. Data for 1994 & 1995 is from ACI.
(3) Does not include diversions. Totals for 1994-1998 include only GA and passenger carrier operations.
(4) Estimated from summary Airport statistics (GA, military, and total operations) and tower data (cargo and
charter) for 2004. Scheduled operations are from the OAG adjusted by the 99.1% completion factor.
Sources: Airport statistics, Airport Council International (ACI), and Official Airline Guide (OAG) as published by
BACK Information Services.
2-4
Master Plan
Table 2.3
Historic Scheduled Seat Departures, Load Factors, and Average Aircraft Size
Scheduled Seat
Departures (1)
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
Avg. Annual Growth
1994-2004
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
701,874
703,097
714,302
662,506
641,908
633,536
705,152
625,483
582,942
597,631
664,427
-0.5%
Scheduled Passenger
Aircraft Departures (2)
Enplanements (3)
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
3,922
4,023
4,158
3,794
3,649
3,705
4,046
3,689
3,444
3,670
4,196
602,106
529,519
487,195
522,280
520,987
501,624
507,137
506,270
481,642
480,416
465,182
410,334
423,771
404,253
421,317
0.7%
-2.1%
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
74.2%
71.3%
71.0%
76.4%
75.0%
75.8%
66.0%
65.6%
72.7%
67.6%
63.4%
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
179.0
174.8
171.8
174.6
175.9
171.0
174.3
169.6
169.3
162.8
158.3
-1.6%
-1.2%
Notes: (1) Offical Airline Guide (OAG) as published by BACK Information Services.
(2) These figures are slightly higher than those in Table 2.2 because they represent total scheduled departures, whereas those in
Table 2.2 represent departures performed (scheduled * completion factor).
(3) Table 2.1.
(4) Enplanements/Scheduled Seat Departures (no adjustment for completion).
(5) Scheduled Seat Departures/Scheduled Operations (no adjustement for completion).
Sources: Table 2.1 and the Offical Airline Guide (OAG) as published by BACK Information Services.
2-5
Master Plan
Table 2.4
Historical Scheduled Seat Departures by Market & Region
Airport Code
YHZ
YYZ
FRA
LGW
ACY
ATL
BOS
BWI
CLT
DCA
DTW
EWR
FLL
JFK
LGA
MCO
MIA
ORD
PHL
RDU
STL
TOTAL
Market
Halifax, Canada
Toronto, Canada
Frankfurt, Germany
London, England
Atlantic City, NJ
Atlanta, GA
Boston, MA
Baltimore, MD
Charlotte, NC
Washington, DC
Detroit, Michigan
Newark, NJ
Fort Lauderdale, FL
New York, NY
New York, NY
Orlando, FL
Miami, FL
Chicago, IL
Philadelphia, PA
Raleigh, NC
St. Louis, MO
Mainland US
Canada
Europe
TOTAL
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
9,230
53,775
31,244
74,825
135,621
45,812
74,190
120,008
46,206
65,279
45,684
701,874
8,710
56,757
1,345
35,096
75,213
107,834
59,595
30,415
94,441
123,057
47,637
62,997
703,097
6,100
56,270
40,018
88,900
103,193
52,704
28,368
111,595
135,008
35,856
56,085
714,097
4,915
51,777
33,384
5,760
74,275
116,199
52,560
26,352
80,542
142,438
21,744
52,560
662,506
607,625
63,005
31,244
701,874
601,189
65,467
36,441
703,097
611,914
62,370
40,018
714,302
572,430
56,692
39,144
668,266
1999
Annual
Growth
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
MARKET
3,976
3,444
50,642
51,312
42,267
42,449
73,125
72,823
109,527
107,603
52,560
52,560
26,064
26,064
74,184
81,251
138,510
117,688
18,493
18,432
52,560
59,910
641,908
633,536
4,116
53,185
47,268
111,303
106,938
52,704
30,102
82,527
120,516
22,176
68,857
5,460
705,152
4,265
52,965
47,187
72,346
106,185
43,102
23,184
74,018
116,150
23,184
62,897
625,483
3,584
51,615
42,449
72,031
106,645
11,640
10,080
14,902
78,684
114,620
15,120
61,418
582,788
3,668
53,247
42,449
71,444
117,719
10,920
24,840
74,463
1,440
115,580
21,480
60,381
597,631
4,200
52,134
49,259
70,587
96,935
23,376
11,280
26,040
77,372
4,200
135,318
28,672
2,640
2,484
79,776
664,273
3,864
51,716
54,480
67,000
76,182
20,328
12,600
26,040
2,960
89,686
125,342
18,960
1,680
23,384
1,794
86,517
662,533
-0.5%
REGION
545,023
536,331
54,618
54,756
42,267
42,449
641,908
633,536
600,583
57,301
47,268
705,152
521,066
57,230
47,187
625,483
485,140
55,199
42,449
582,788
498,267
56,915
42,449
597,631
558,680
56,334
49,259
664,273
552,473
55,580
54,480
662,533
-0.9%
-1.1%
5.2%
-0.5%
Source: Official Airline Guide (OAG) as published by BACK Information Services. Year 2005 data was pulled in July 2005 and may change slightly over the next six months. Total seat departures in this table
differ slightly from those in Table 2.3 because this table does not include markets to which annual seat departures totaled less than 200 in any given year.
2-6
-7.6%
-0.4%
5.2%
-1.0%
-5.1%
-7.1%
1.7%
0.4%
-7.8%
2.6%
Master Plan
2.3.1
Cargo
2.3
Fuel Assumptions
The real cost of fuel is assumed to
increase gradually, in accordance with the
U.S. Federal Aviation Administrations
(FAA) Aerospace Forecast, 2005-2016 and
the
U.S.
Department
of
Energy,
International Energy Outlook 2005. Both
forecasts assume some oil and gas price
volatility in the short-term but then expect a
steady increase in prices over time. No
major price shocks or disruption, as
occurred in the mid- and late-1970s, are
assumed. Also, no major increases in fuel
taxes are assumed.
Future Security Environment
BASE FORECAST
2-7
Master Plan
Economic Assumptions
The forecasts also assume no major
downturn in the Bermuda economy.
International economies will periodically
increase and decrease their pace of growth in
accordance with business cycles; however, it
is assumed that, over the 20-year forecast
term, these high- and low-growth periods
will offset each other.
2.3.2
Master Plan
AAGR 2004-23*
4.0%
ADJUSTED Airbus
Passenger Traffic Forecast by Sub-market
6.9%
Sub-markets
Bermuda U.S.
Bermuda-Western
Europe
5.9%
An
examination
of
year-to-date
passenger data and hotel bookings suggests
that Bermuda had not completely recovered
from the adverse impacts of Hurricane
Fabian in 2004, making 2004 less than ideal
as a base year. Year-to-date passenger data
for 2005 was extrapolated for the remainder
of the year to generate an annual estimate of
458,544 enplaned passengers. The 2005
enplanement estimate was then used as the
base year to which the growth rates were
applied.
12
AAGR 2004-23*
0.7%
2-9
Master Plan
Table 2.5
Bermuda and Caribbean Historical Scheduled Seat Departures by Region
Destination
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
Growth
From CARIBBEAN
To Mainland US
9,392,467
9,739,043
9,799,283
9,544,706
9,689,512
10,366,832
10,886,978
10,915,127
10,677,128
11,638,847
11,835,764
12,204,445
2.4%
To Europe
2,083,878
2,484,657
2,613,458
2,787,548
3,107,444
3,550,959
3,980,740
3,940,659
3,847,973
3,853,908
4,045,292
4,017,531
6.1%
From BERMUDA
Mainland US
RATIO (1)
607,625
6.5%
601,189
6.2%
611,914
6.2%
572,430
6.0%
545,023
5.6%
536,331
5.2%
600,583
5.5%
521,066
4.8%
485,140
4.5%
498,267
4.3%
558,680
4.7%
552,473
4.5%
-0.9%
-3.2%
Europe
RATIO (2)
31,244
1.5%
36,441
1.5%
40,018
1.5%
39,144
1.4%
42,267
1.4%
42,449
1.2%
47,268
1.2%
47,187
1.2%
42,449
1.1%
42,449
1.1%
49,259
1.2%
54,480
1.4%
5.2%
-0.9%
ADJUSTMENT FACTOR
Mainland US
from Caribbean
from Bermuda
2.4%
-0.9%
ADJUSTMENT-U.S. (3)
3.3%
Europe
from Caribbean
from Bermuda
6.1%
5.2%
ADJUSTMENT-Europe (4)
1.0%
ADJUSTMENT to AIRBUS FORECAST
Caribbean- U.S.
Unadjusted
Adjusted (5)
4.0%
0.7%
6.9%
5.9%
2-10
Berm
u
12
da-U
10
n-U
a
e
b
b
ari
.S.
500
400
300
ur o pe
E
n
a
e
b
Carib
200
100
Bermuda-Europe
0
1994
Figure 2-2
600
.S.
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
0
2004
700
14
Master Plan
Table 2.6
Forecast of Scheduled Enplanements by Region
Year
Bermuda-U.S.
Bermuda-Europe
2004 (2)
2005 (3)
338,071
367,872
38,601
47,802
43,163
42,870
419,835
458,544
2010
2015
2020
2025
381,483
395,598
410,236
425,415
63,775
85,085
113,515
151,446
43,859
44,871
45,906
46,965
489,117
525,554
569,657
623,825
0.7%
5.9%
0.5%
1.6%
Notes: (1) The Airbus forecast does not include a Caribbean-Canada passenger forecast. The growth rate for
Canadian passengers was derived as follows: U.S. adjusted rate - (Historical growth in U.S./Bermuda
Passengers - Historical growth in Canada/Bermuda Passengers) or 7%-(-0.9%-(-1.1%)). See Table 2.4 for
growth in seat departures from Bermuda to Canada.
(2) Total enplanements are slightly lower than those in Table 2.1 because the figures in this table do not
include charter passengers. Airport records include only the complete regional breakout of schedule
carrier passengers.
(3) Extrapolated from January through March 2005 data using 2004 seasonality factors.
Sources: Bermuda Digest of Statistics, 2000, Bermuda Statistics Department, and Airport statistics.
2-11
Master Plan
are
2.3.4
13
2-12
Master Plan
Table 2.7
Historical and Projected Load Factors and Seat Departures by Region
Year
U.S. (1)
Europe (2)
Canada (2)
Overall
LOAD FACTORS
2002
2003
2004
2005 (3)
AVERAGE
68.7%
64.0%
60.5%
66.6%
64.9%
95.0%
91.2%
78.4%
87.7%
88.1%
77.3%
77.5%
76.6%
77.1%
77.1%
71.4%
67.2%
63.2%
69.2%
67.7%
2010
2015
2020
2025
66.6%
66.6%
66.6%
66.6%
88.1%
88.1%
88.1%
88.1%
77.1%
77.1%
77.1%
77.1%
69.7%
70.2%
70.8%
71.6%
558,680
552,473
572,915
594,113
616,095
638,891
49,259
54,480
72,419
96,617
128,901
171,972
5.9%
56,334
55,580
56,860
58,172
59,514
60,887
0.5%
664,273
662,533
702,194
748,902
804,510
871,750
1.4%
Notes: (1) The U.S. load factors are projected to grow in line with the FAA load factor projections for the
Atlantic travel region.
(2) European and Canadian load factors are projected to remain constant over the forecast period.
(3) Estimated to be equal to estimated enplanements from Table 2.6 divided by scheduled seat departures.
Sources: Offical Airline Guide as published by BACK Information Services, Airport statistics,
FAA Aerospace Forecast 2005-2016, and HNTB analysis.
2-13
Master Plan
14
2006.
2-14
Master Plan
Table 2.8
Forecast of Scheduled Passenger Aircraft Operations by Aircraft Type
Aircraft
2004 (1)
2005 (2)
2010
2015
2020
2025
8,318
1,800
1,166
52
890
1,260
2
1,776
1,030
28
480
-
808
1,804
1,466
68
900
1,318
1,870
650
28
730
-
968
1,774
1,568
316
920
1,342
218
1,668
500
28
730
-
1,260
1,734
1,428
560
826
2,260
1,610
200
730
416
1,260
1,534
1,328
950
780
1,700
2,470
1,010
520
8,484
9,642
10,032
11,024
11,552
0.0%
21.2%
13.7%
0.6%
10.5%
14.9%
0.0%
0.0%
20.9%
12.1%
0.3%
5.7%
0.0%
100%
8.4%
18.7%
15.2%
0.7%
9.3%
13.7%
0.0%
0.0%
19.4%
6.7%
0.3%
7.6%
0.0%
100%
9.6%
17.7%
15.6%
3.1%
9.2%
13.4%
0.0%
2.2%
16.6%
5.0%
0.3%
7.3%
0.0%
100%
11.4%
15.7%
13.0%
5.1%
7.5%
20.5%
0.0%
14.6%
1.8%
0.0%
0.0%
6.6%
3.8%
100%
2-15
10.9%
13.3%
11.5%
8.2%
6.8%
14.7%
0.0%
21.4%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
8.7%
4.5%
100%
Master Plan
General Aviation
Operations
15
2-16
Master Plan
GA Based Aircraft
Table 2.10 displays the current and
projected GA fleet mix at BDA. The current
fleet mix was derived from 2004 radar data
provided by the BDA air traffic control
tower and a radar sample taken using Flight
Explorer software over a three-week period
in July 2005. Both radar samples include
each daily operation that took place over the
specified period, including aircraft type and
arrival and departure time. The projected
fleet mix is based on the existing fleet mix,
announced aircraft orders, details about
upcoming aircraft models, industry
forecasts, discussions with Airport staff, and
professional judgment.
18
2005.
2-17
Master Plan
Table 2.9
Forecast of General Aviation Operations
Year
Operations
5,241
2004 (1)
6,938
8,765
11,073
13,989
2010
2015
2020
2025
Average Annual Growth
2004-2025
2-18
4.8%
Master Plan
Table 2.10
Forecast of GA Operations by Aircraft Type
Aircraft Code
Aircraft Type
(1)
Aircraft Name
Aircraft Size
2004 (2)
2010
2015
2020
2025
0%
1%
1%
1%
1%
3%
3%
1%
0%
8%
0%
0%
0%
4%
2%
0%
6%
4%
1%
3%
0%
0%
1%
1%
1%
3%
13%
5%
0%
16%
2%
0%
1%
6%
0%
1%
2%
3%
3%
0%
1%
2%
0%
1%
3%
3%
1%
2%
8%
3%
1%
2%
0%
2%
1%
8%
3%
0%
2%
1%
3%
2%
2%
0%
1%
14%
5%
1%
16%
0%
3%
0%
2%
2%
1%
1%
3%
0%
1%
1%
1%
0%
1%
2%
3%
1%
3%
8%
3%
1%
2%
0%
2%
1%
8%
3%
0%
2%
2%
3%
3%
2%
0%
0%
14%
6%
1%
16%
0%
5%
0%
0%
2%
1%
0%
2%
0%
1%
1%
1%
0%
0%
2%
3%
0%
5%
7%
3%
2%
2%
0%
2%
2%
8%
2%
0%
2%
2%
3%
4%
2%
0%
0%
14%
6%
1%
15%
0%
5%
0%
0%
2%
1%
0%
2%
0%
1%
1%
1%
0%
0%
2%
3%
0%
5%
7%
3%
2%
2%
0%
2%
2%
8%
2%
0%
2%
2%
3%
4%
2%
0%
0%
14%
6%
1%
15%
0%
5%
0%
0%
2%
1%
0%
2%
0%
3%
2%
1%
1%
1%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
BE20
Jet
Jet
Jet
Jet
Jet
Jet
Jet
Jet
Jet
Jet
Jet
Jet
Jet
Jet
Jet
Jet
Jet
Jet
Jet
Jet
Jet
Jet
Jet
Jet
Jet
Jet
Jet
Jet
Jet
Jet
Jet
Jet
Jet
Jet
Jet
Jet
Jet
Jet
Jet
Large
Light to Mid
Large
Light
Light
Light to Mid
Light to Mid
Mid
Mid
Mid
Mid
Light
Light
Mid-Large
Mid-Large
Mid-Large
Mid
Mid-Large
Light
Mid
Large
Mid-Large
Mid
Mid-Large
Mid-Large
Mid-Large
Mid-Large
Mid-Large
Mid-Large
Mid
Mid
Light
Light
Light
Light
Light to Mid
Mid
Light to Mid
Light to Mid
Turboprop
TOTAL
Notes: (1) Single engine piston aircraft currently account for less than one percent of operations and are projected to remain at this level.
(2) 2004 daily radar data and radar from a three week period in July, 2005.
Source: HNTB analysis. See text for details.
2-19
2.3.6
Master Plan
Cargo
19
20
2-20
Master Plan
Table 2.11
Forecast of Cargo Tonnage (Metric Tonnes of Mail and Freight)
Year
Inbound
Belly
Outbound
Total
Inbound
All-Cargo
Outbound
Total
Inbound
Total
Outbound
Total
Percent
Belly
2004 (1)
3,569
334
3,902
3,286
1,076
4,363
6,855
1,410
8,265
47.2%
2010
2015
2020
2025
3,938
3,861
4,810
5,866
353
348
412
488
4,291
4,209
5,222
6,354
4,558
6,221
7,387
8,861
1,493
2,037
2,419
2,901
6,051
8,258
9,806
11,762
8,496
10,082
12,197
14,727
1,846
2,385
2,831
3,389
10,342
12,467
15,028
18,116
41.5%
33.8%
34.7%
35.1%
Average Annual
Growth (3)
2004-2025
2.3%
4.8%
3.8%
Notes: (1) Belly cargo tonnage from Airport statistics by airline for 2004. All-cargo tonnage from T-100 data as published by the U.S. Department of
Transportation.
(2) Tonnage carried in the belly of passenger aircraft. Remaining cargo carried by all-cargo aircraft. All mail carried by passenger carriers. See
text for load factor assumptions. Cargo capacity on U.S. carriers dropped significantly between 2004 and 2005 and is expected to continue to
drop gradually through the forecast period as B757s and B767s are replaced by smaller next generation B737s.
(3) See text for details.
Sources: Boeing World Cargo Forecast 2004/2005 and HNTB analysis.
2-21
Master Plan
cargo capacity in each forecast year (allcargo tonnage in each forecast year divided
by projected load factor in each forecast
year). It is assumed that all-cargo load
factors will increase by about 0.5 percent per
year.21 Once future all-cargo capacity was
calculated, the future fleet mix was projected
using data on aircraft orders and anticipated
cargo trends.
2.3.8
Charter
Military
21
Master Plan
2.4
ALTERNATIVE FORECAST
SCENARIOS
Master Plan
Table 2.12
Summary of Annual Aircraft Operations Forecast, by Operation Type
Year
Scheduled
Passenger (1)
2004
8,318
5,241
2010
2015
2020
2025
9,642
10,032
11,024
11,552
6,938
8,765
11,073
13,989
1.6%
General
Aviation (2)
4.8%
All-Cargo (3)
Military (4)
Charter (5)
TOTAL
546
283
186
14,574
540
622
644
780
260
260
260
260
210
210
210
210
17,590
19,889
23,211
26,791
1.7%
0.0%
0.0%
2.9%
2-24
Enplanements (1000)
Historic
Forecast
600
500
400
300
200
100
0
1990
1995
2000
2005
2010
2015
2020
2025
2020
2025
25
All-cargo
20
Belly
15
10
5
0
2004
2010
2015
2020
2025
Historic
Forecast
25
20
15
10
Figure 2-3
5
0
1990
1995
2000
2005
2010
2015
Master Plan
Table 2.13
Summary of Overall Airport Activity Peaking Characteristics
2004
2010
2015
2020
2025
Passenger Enplanements
Annual (1)
Peak Month (2)
Avg. Day/Peak Month (3)
Peak Hour (4)
419,835
52,077
1,680
593
489,117
60,670
1,957
592
525,554
65,190
2,103
591
569,657
70,660
2,279
597
623,825
77,380
2,496
603
Passenger Deplanements
Annual (1)
Peak Month (2)
Avg. Day/Peak Month (3)
Peak Hour (4)
419,835
52,077
1,680
633
489,117
60,670
1,957
656
525,554
65,190
2,103
678
569,657
70,660
2,279
685
623,825
77,380
2,496
691
Total Passengers
Annual (1)
Peak Month (2)
Avg. Day/Peak Month (3)
Peak Hour (4)
839,670
104,153
3,360
853
978,234
121,341
3,914
876
1,051,108
130,380
4,206
898
1,139,313
141,321
4,559
973
1,247,650
154,759
4,992
1,047
14,574
1,577
51
9
17,590
1,909
62
11
19,889
2,158
70
12
23,211
2,519
81
14
26,791
2,907
94
17
2-25
Master Plan
22
Master Plan
23
25
2-27
Master Plan
Table 2.14
Summary of High Forecast Scenario
Passenger Enplanements
Annual (1)
Peak Month (2)
Avg. Day/Peak Month (3)
Peak Hour (4)
Enplanements
Deplanements
Total
Air Cargo Tonnage (1)
Belly
All Cargo
Total
Total Aircraft Operations
Scheduled Passenger (1)
General Aviation (5)
All-Cargo (1)
Military (5)
Charter (1)
Total
2004
2010
2015
2020
2025
419,835
52,077
1,680
706,767
87,668
2,828
874,188
108,435
3,498
1,083,544
134,403
4,336
1,346,162
166,979
5,386
593
633
853
637
730
1,106
705
808
1,269
790
906
1,473
897
1,028
1,729
3,902
4,363
8,265
5,226
5,549
10,775
5,939
7,354
13,293
8,492
7,986
16,479
11,833
8,712
20,545
8,318
5,241
546
283
186
14,574
10,610
6,938
490
260
237
18,535
12,765
8,765
526
260
285
22,602
15,648
11,073
500
260
350
27,831
19,219
13,989
520
260
430
34,418
2-28
Master Plan
2-29
Master Plan
Table 2.15
Summary of Low Forecast Scenario
2004
Passenger Enplanements
Annual (1)
Peak Month (2)
Avg. Day/Peak Month (3)
Peak Hour (4)
Enplanements
Deplanements
Total
Air Cargo Tonnage (1)
Belly
All Cargo
Total
Total Aircraft Operations
Scheduled Passenger (1)
General Aviation (5)
All-Cargo (1)
Military (5)
Charter (1)
Total
2010
2015
2020
2025
419,835
52,077
1,680
456,667
56,645
1,827
479,848
59,521
1,920
508,122
63,028
2,033
542,947
67,347
2,172
593
633
853
592
648
862
593
655
885
594
663
912
596
674
946
3,902
4,363
8,265
4,008
6,042
10,050
3,846
8,014
11,860
4,665
9,327
13,992
5,543
10,953
16,496
8,318
5,241
546
283
186
14,574
8,837
6,938
558
260
186
16,779
9,300
8,765
642
260
186
19,153
9,756
11,073
704
260
186
21,979
9,994
13,989
834
260
186
25,263
2-30
Master Plan
FACILITY REQUIREMENTS
Chapter Three
FACILITY REQUIREMENTS
3.1
INTRODUCTION
Airfield,
Terminal facilities,
Air cargo,
General Aviation,
Utilities.
3.2
DESIGN CRITERIA
3.2.1
Master Plan
Non-instrument
Non-precision instrument
Take-off runway
Approach Minimums
3-2
Master Plan
Table 3.1
Aerodrome Reference Codes
Code Element 1
Code
Aeroplane Reference
Number
Field Length
Code
Letter
F
Source: ICAO Annex 14.
3-3
Code Element 2
Outer Main Gear
Wing Span
Wheel Span
Up to but not inc. Up to but not inc.
49 ft (15 m)
15 ft (4.5 m)
49 ft (15 m) up to
but not inc. 79 ft
(24 m)
79 ft (24 m) up to
but not inc. 118 ft
(36 m)
118 ft (36 m) up
to but not inc. 171
ft (52 m)
171 ft (52 m) up
to but not inc. 214
ft (65 m)
214 ft (65 m) up
to but not inc. 262
ft (80 m)
15 ft (4.5 m) up to
but not inc. 20 ft
(6 m)
20 ft (6 m) up to
but not inc. 30 ft
(9 m)
30 ft (9 m) up to
but not inc. 46 ft
(14 m)
30 ft (9 m) up to
but not inc. 46 ft
(14 m)
46 ft (14 m) up to
but not inc. 52 ft
(16 m)
Master Plan
Table 3.2
Aerodrome Reference Codes and Representative Aircraft
Representative Aircraft
B200 King Air
Lear Jet 28/29
Lear Jet 35A/36A
CRJ-200
EMB 145
Gulfstream Aero. G-V
Bombardier Global Express
A300 B2
A318
A319
A320
A321
B717-200
B727-200
B737-300
B737-400
B737-800
B737-900
MD 81/82/83
MD 87
A300-600
B757-200
B757-300
B767-200
B767-300
DC-10-30
MD 11
A330-200
A330-300
A340-300
B747-400
B777-200
B777-300
B787-3 (Prelim.)
B787-8 (Prelim)
B787-5 (Prelim.)
A380
Aerodrome
Reference
Code
1B
2A
3A
3B
3B
4C
3C
3D
4C
4C
4C
4C
3C
4C
4C
4C
4C
4C
4C
4C
4D
4D
4D
4D
4D
4D
4D
4E
4E
4E
4E
4E
4E
4D
4E
4E
4F
Wing Span
(Feet)
(Metres)
54.5
44.0
39.4
69.6
65.6
93.5
94.2
147.1
111.8
111.8
111.8
111.8
93.2
108.0
94.8
94.8
112.5
112.5
107.8
107.8
147.0
124.7
124.7
156.1
156.1
165.3
169.6
197.8
197.8
197.1
211.4
199.8
199.9
165-170
197.0
197.0
261.8
16.6
13.4
12.0
21.2
20.0
28.5
28.7
44.8
34.1
34.1
34.1
34.1
28.4
32.9
28.9
28.9
34.3
34.3
32.9
32.9
44.8
38.0
38.0
47.6
47.6
50.4
51.7
60.3
60.3
60.3
64.9
60.9
60.9
50-52
60.0
60.0
79.8
Length
(Feet)
(Metres)
43.8
47.6
48.7
87.8
98.1
96.3
99.4
175.9
103.1
111.0
123.3
146.0
124.0
153.2
100.1
119.8
129.6
137.5
147.8
130.4
177.5
155.2
178.6
159.1
180.3
181.6
200.8
193.0
208.1
208.8
231.8
209.1
239.8
186.0
186.0
202.0
239.5
13.3
14.5
14.8
26.8
29.9
29.4
30.3
53.6
31.4
33.8
37.6
44.5
37.8
46.7
30.5
36.5
39.5
41.9
45.1
39.8
54.1
47.3
54.4
48.5
54.9
55.4
61.2
58.8
63.6
63.6
70.4
63.7
73.1
57.0
57.0
62.0
73.0
Sources: Aerodrome Design Manual Part 2 Appendix 3, aircraft manufacturer websites, and planning manuals.
3-4
5.6
2.5
2.5
4.0
4.8
5.1
4.9
10.9
n/a
n/a
8.7
n/a
5.4
6.9
6.4
6.4
7.0
7.0
6.2
6.2
10.9
8.7
8.7
10.8
10.8
12.6
12.0
12.0
12.0
12.0
12.4
12.8
12.8
n/a
n/a
n/a
15.0
Master Plan
AIRFIELD CAPACITY
REQUIREMENTS
aircraft fleet
procedures.
Airfield Layout
3.3
and
operational
mix,
3-5
Master Plan
Meteorological Conditions
The FAA classifies weather conditions
according to two basic types: visual
meteorological conditions (VMC) and
instrument
meteorological
conditions
(IMC). During VMC, pilots can maintain
visual separation, and in-trail distances may
be reduced, increasing capacity. IMC occurs
when visibility or cloud ceiling falls below
the minimums prescribed for VMC. During
IMC, IFR procedures apply and spacing
between aircraft is increased to ensure safe
operations.
Based on eight-year meteorological data
(January 1997 through December 2004),
VMC occurs approximately 98.0 percent of
the year at BDA, while IMC occurs about 1.9
percent of the year (as shown in Table 3.3).
Conditions below IMC (i.e., below a 200foot ceiling and/or -mile visibility) occur
about 0.1 percent annually.
When
conditions fall below this level, aircraft may
be delayed until conditions improve or may
Master Plan
Table 3.3
Ceiling/Visibility Conditions
Meteorological
Condition
Percent
VMC (1)
IMC Category 1 (2)
IMC Below Category 1 (3)
Total IMC
Grand Total
98.02%
1.93%
0.05%
1.98%
100.00%
3-7
Master Plan
3.3.2
Annual Capacity
3-8
Master Plan
3.4
AIRFIELD REQUIREMENTS
Airfield Delay
3.4.1
New Runways
Wind Coverage
Aircraft generally land and take-off into
the wind. In addition, pilots prefer to land
with as little cross-wind as possible. The
cross-wind component is the wind direction
and velocity vector at a right angle to the
runway. Each aircraft type is certified to
operate within a maximum cross-wind
component; larger, faster aircraft generally
are able to operate with higher cross-winds
than smaller, slower aircraft.
3-9
10.0
10.0
9.0
9.0
8.0
8.0
7.0
7.0
6.0
6.0
5.0
5.0
4.0
4.0
Year
2025
High
Scenario
3.0
2.0
Year
2004
Year
2010
Year
2020
Year
2015
3.0
t
you
a
ld L
e
i
f
r
i
ing A
t
s
i
x
E
Year
2025
1.0
2.0
1.0
0.0
0.0
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Master Plan
Table 3.4
Aerodrome Reference Code 4E Dimensional Standards
Facility Dimension
Feet
Metres
--(1)--
Runway Length
Runway Width
150.0
45.0
Width of Rwy+Shoulders
200.0
60.0
200.0
60.0
1,000.0
300.0
300.0
790.0
90.0
240.0
--(2)--
Clearway Length
--(3)--
Clearway Width
500.0
150.0
Stopway Width
150.0
45.0
400.0
120.0
Taxiway Width
75.0
23.0
144.4
44.0
Twy Width+Shoulders
3-10
Master Plan
Table 3.5
Minimum Separation Distances (Centre Line-to-Centre Line) (1)
Aerodrome Reference Code 4E & Precision Approach Category I
Facility
Feet
Metres
300.0
90.0 (2)
600.0
180.0
Taxiway to Taxiway
270.0
80.0
Taxiway to Object
160.0
47.5
140.0
42.5
3-11
Master Plan
26
3-12
See Appendix B.
Master Plan
Table 3.6
Runway 12-30 Wind Coverage
Cross-wind
Component
AllWeather
IMC (1)
74.1%
52.0%
85.4%
65.8%
97.4%
89.4%
Note: (1) Ceiling less than 200 feet and/or visibility less than mile.
Sources: Bermuda Weather Service; HNTB analysis.
3-13
+
26
+
25
+
+
+
+
+
+
21
+
.1
20
+
+
.1 .1
.1
.2
.1
+
.1
17
.2
.1
16
.2 .2
+
.2
.3
.4 .2 14
.1
.2
.4
.2
13
.2
.3
.1
.4
.2
.2
.1
.3 .3 11 .4 .4
.4
.4
.3
.3
10
.3
.3
.4
.2
.9 .9 .6 .8 .8
.4
.3
+
.4
.4
.8.6
.7 .7
.1
.4
.4
.4
6
.6
.7
.4
.5
5
.7
.7
.5
.4
+
.4
.2
.8
.9
.4 .4
.4 .2
.8
.9
Calm
.3 .2
.3
.7
+
.4 .5 .8
.1
1.1
.9
16.8
.8
.4
.7
.2
1.2
.9
.2
.5
.9
1.3
.4
.1
.9
.3
.7
1.7
.8
.4
.7
.2
1.1
1.0
.7
.3
.2
1.41.3
.9
.7
.8
.1
1.0 .8 1.11.0
.4
.8
.6
.1
.7
.2
1.1
.4
1.0 .7
.8
.2
+
.3
.5
.4 .6 .5
.1
1.1
.3
1.1
.3
.1
.8
.6 .4 .5
.3
+
.8
.2
.8
.2
+
.3
.5
.3 .3
+
.1
.4
.5
.1
.2
.3
.2
+
.2
+
.3
.4
.2
.3
.2
.2
.3
.2
.3
.1
.1
.1
.2
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
2-30
20 Kt
s
13 Kt
s
10 Kt
s
.1
Rwy 1
+
.2
.1
.1
.1
All Weather
Figure 3-2
.0
.0
.1
.2
26
.1
25
.0
.0
.0
.2
.1
.2
.1
21
.0
.0
20
.0
.2 .0
.1
.1
.0
.2
.1
17
.5
.2
16
.1
.2
.0
.2
.2
.0
.2
.2
14 .0 .2
.2
.0
13
.2 .2
.1
.2
.0
.0
.8
.1 .1 11
.2
.2
.0
.1
.2
10
.0
.2
.0
.1
.6
.0
.2 .2 .2 .5
.2
.2
.3
.3
.1
.5 .5
.2 .4
.3
.2
.3
.0
.7
6
.2
.3
.2
.2
.5
.4
5
.2
.1
.5
.0
.2
.4
.7
.2
.2
.3 .1
.5 .5
.2
Calm
.4
.7
.4
.2 .2
.2
.5 .5 1.3
.2
.9
.2
5.8
1.8
.2
.3
.8
.2
.5
1.4 2.0
1.7
.4
.0
.0
.9
.5
2.1
.5
.2
.3
.7
.0
.5
.2
.9
1.6
.4
1.21.4
.2
1.7
.2
.7
.5 .4 .7 .9
1.0
1.6
.1
.2
.8
.3
1.1
.3
1.5
.0
1.8 .8 .5 .5 .2
1.1
.3
.1
.3
1.4
.1
.3
1.9
.5
.0
2.7
1.6
1.7 .5 .7
.4
.2
.8
.1
3.0
.2
2.5 1.1
.7
.2
.2
.8
.6
1.3
.2
1.4
.3
.2
.2
.0
1.1
.1
.2
1.0
.3
.9
.3
.5
.2
.1
.3
.2
.2
.2
.2
.2
.2
.1
.2
.2
.0
2-30
.1
.3
Rwy 1
.2
20 Kt
s
13 Kt
s
10 Kt
s
.0
.2
IFR
Figure 3-3
Master Plan
Airfield Capacity
The estimated annual capacity of the
Airport under its current airfield layout is
estimated at 80,000 to 90,000 annual
operations assuming an average annual
delay of about four minutes per aircraft
operation. Recognising that the 20-year
activity forecast will reach 26,400 under the
Base Forecast and 34,400 under the High
Forecast Scenario, average aircraft delay is
expected to be less than 0.4 minutes per
operation; therefore, no additional airfield
capacity is required.
3.4.2
Runway Length
Runway length requirements for BDA
therefore considered the Airports elevation
at sea level, a mean maximum temperature
of 86 degrees Fahrenheit, the forecast fleet
mix found in Chapter Two of this Report,
existing and anticipated stage lengths (i.e.,
trip lengths) ranging from 1,000 to 4,000
statute miles, a full passenger load, and a 50
percent cargo load. Figure 3-4 shows
markets currently receiving non-stop service
from BDA. Based on Governments Air
Services Strategy report, all scheduled
markets of interest are within the U.S. and
the Caribbean and are within 4,000 statute
miles of BDA. The Government is also
pursuing service by charter operators to the
U.S., Canada, and Europe. Most of Western
Europe is within 4,000 statue miles of BDA.
Although it is anticipated that Bermuda will
not likely receive regular (i.e., more than 500
annual operations) non-stop service from
markets greater than 4,000 statute miles, for
planning
purposes,
runway
length
requirements at maximum take-off weight
were also determined assuming a balanced
London
Miami
Figure 3-4
Existing Markets
1000 sm
2000 sm
Orlando
3000 sm
4000 sm
Master Plan
3.4.3
Runway Width
Runway Strength
27
3-15
Master Plan
Table 3.7
Runway Length Requirements--Commercial Airline Fleet (1, 2, 3)
Aircraft Type
EMB145 (4)
B717
A319 (4)
A320 (4)
A321 (4)
B737-300
B737-400
B737-700 (4)
B737-800 (4)
B737-900 Winglets (4)
MD88
B727-200 (4)(5)
B757-200 (4)
B757-300
B767-200ER (4)
B767-300ER
B747-400
B777-200 (4)
B777-300
A330-200 (4)
A330-300
A340-300
B787-8 (6)
Take-off with 100 Pct. Passenger Load & 50 Pct. Cargo Load
Stage Length (Statute Miles)
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,700
4,900
4,500
6,100
6,700
5,100
5,300
4,100
5,700
6,200
5,500
6,800
5,100
6,100
4,900
4,900
-4,600
6,400
6,600
6,200
6,300
5,000
6,900
5,800
4,800
7,000
7,800
6,300
6,300
4,800
6,200
7,300
7,000
9,000
6,000
7,000
5,400
5,300
-5,100
7,200
6,800
6,400
6,600
5,400
--5,500
---8,400
5,500
7,500
8,300
--7,800
8,000
6,000
6,000
6,000
5,600
8,100
7,400
7,000
6,900
5,700
--------------6,800
6,600
6,900
6,200
9,000
8,900
8,400
7,200
6,200
Take-off at
Maximum
Takeoff Wt.
7,100
5,800
9,500
7,300
7,800
7,900
8,900
6,800
8,700
9,000
8,100
10,500
7,900
8,900
8,100
9,400
11,000
11,700
11,100
12,300
11,600
10,700
10,000
(est.)
4,700
4,700
4,600
5,100
5,600
4,600
5,200
4,200
5,200
5,500
5,000
5,000
4,700
5,600
5,000
5,200
6,800
5,200
6,000
5,700
6,000
6,500
N/A
5,400
5,400
5,300
5,900
6,500
5,300
5,900
4,900
6,100
6,300
5,700
5,700
5,400
6,400
5,600
6,000
7,800
6,000
7,000
6,600
6,900
7,500
N/A
Notes: (1) Based on mean maximum temperature of 86 degrees Fahrenheit at sea level; calm wind; estimated typical fuel reserves.
(2) Typical mixed-class seating configuration and engine types.
(3) For planning purposes only; accurate to within approximately 200 feet.
(4) Aircraft in forecast fleet mix. (See Table 2.8.)
(5) Freighter--assumes 85% useful load.
(6) Preliminary.
Sources: Aircraft characteristics for airport planning manuals from manufacturers; Jane's All the World's Aircraft (various years); HNTB analysis.
3-16
Master Plan
Runway Shoulders
3.4.7
Runway Strips
Appendix 2 in Part 2 of ICAO
Document 9157 AN/901, Aerodrome Design
Manual recommends that blast pads should
be at least as wide as the runway and
shoulders and extend 400 feet (120 metres)
beyond the runway end. The west (12) end
has about 500 feet (150 metres) of paved
surface beyond the runway threshold that
serves as a blast pad, whilst the east (30) end
has about 260 feet (80 metres) of paved
surface that serves as a blast pad.
3-17
Master Plan
Table 3.8
Aircraft Classification Number (ACN) (1)
Aircraft Type
ACN
A330-200
B747-400ER
B777-200LR
B727-200F
B767-300
B737-800
B737-900
MD-88
A320-200
B737-700
B757-200
62
62
61
52
44
43
43
39
37
36
34
3-18
3.4.8
Master Plan
3.4.9
Clearways
3.4.10
Stopways
3.4.11
Taxiway Requirements
3-19
Master Plan
28
3-20
Master Plan
NAVAIDs
3-21
3.5
Master Plan
Demand Levels
TERMINAL AND
CONCOURSE
REQUIREMENTS
3-22
Master Plan
Peak
operational
periods
were
determined based on current airline
flight scheduling characteristics for
BDA.
Specific
space
and
operational
considerations used to develop planning
factors of the major component areas are
described in additional detail below.
Ticketing
3-23
Master Plan
Table 3.9
Existing Terminal Building - Total Area by Function, 2005
Space
LF
Airline Functions
Ticket Counter - SF
Ticket Counter - LF
Ticket Counter Queuing
Airline Ticket Office
Curbside Baggage Check
Departure Lounge (Gates)
Baggage Claim (SF)
Baggage Claim (LF)
Baggage Service/Storage
Outbound Baggage
Inbound Baggage
Operations/Maintenance/Storage
Clubs/VIP Room
Subtotal Airline Functions
SF
2,594
247
4,970
9,518
15,326
10,284
354
Concessions Space
Food/Beverage
News/Gift/Sundry
Rental Car
Other Revenue
Subtotal Concessions Space
950
19,962
3,499
7,639
9,230
83,972
5,301
9,746
6,584
21,631
Existing, 2005
Existing Factor
593
593
593
593
6
633
633
633
593
633
419,835
2
PHEP
PHEP
PHEP
PHEP
PHEP
Gates
PHTP
PHTP
PHTP
PHEP
PHTP
ANNEP
Clubs
4.37
0.42
8.38
16.05
2,554
16.25
0.56
1.50
33.66
5.53
0.0182
4,615
SF/PHEP
LF/PHEP
SF/PHEP
SF/PHEP
SF/PHEP
SF/Gate
SF/PHTP
LF/PHTP
SF/PHTP
SF/PHEP
SF/PHTP
SF/ANNEP
SF/Club
419,835
419,835
419,835
ANNEP
ANNEP
ANNEP
ANNEP
0.0126
0.0232
0.0157
SF/ANNEP
SF/ANNEP
SF/ANNEP
SF/ANNEP
21,984
633
PHTP
35
21,601
43,585
593
PHEP
36
1,432
12,835
1,055
15,322
3
6
853
-
Checkpoints
Gates
PHP
14,931
18,792
3,239
494
37,456
593
419,835
853
419,835
Non-Public Area
Airport Administration
Circulation
Police Station
Maintenance & Miscellaneous
Mechanical/Electrical/Building Systems
Subtotal Non-Public Area
16,155
10,759
1,815
1,389
4,237
34,355
16,155
10,759
1,815
1,389
4,237
236,321
% of Total
1.10%
2.10%
4.03%
6.49%
4.35%
0.40%
8.45%
1.48%
3.23%
3.91%
35.53%
2.24%
4.12%
0.00%
2.79%
9.15%
9.30%
SF/PHEP
9.14%
18.44%
477
2,139
1.24
-
SF/Chkpt
SF/Gate
SF/PHP
SF/ANNEP
0.61%
5.43%
0.45%
0.00%
6.48%
PHEP
PHTP
ANNEP
PHP
ANNEP
25.18
0.0448
3.80
0.0012
SF/PHEP
SF/PHTP
SF/ANNEP
SF/PHP
SF/ANNEP
6.32%
0.00%
7.95%
1.37%
0.21%
15.85%
As Required
As Required
As Required
Total SF
Total SF
16,155
10,759
1,815
0.59%
1.79%
SF
SF
SF
Of Total SF
Of Total SF
6.84%
4.55%
0.77%
0.59%
1.79%
14.54%
100.00%
3-24
Master Plan
Table 3.10
Passenger Terminal Building - Planning Factors
Factor
Remarks
Airline Functions
Ticket Counter - SF
Ticket Counter - LF
Ticket Counter Queuing
Airline Ticket Office
Curbside Baggage Check
Departure Lounge
ERJ 145 (Regional Jets) [50 Pax]
A319/320/321/B737-700,800,900 [134-177 Pax]
B757 [186 Pax]
B767 [269 Pax]
A330/B777 [293, 305 Pax]
Baggage Claim (SF)
Baggage Claim (LF)
Baggage Service
Outbound Baggage
Inbound Baggage
Operations/Maintenance/Storage
Clubs/VIP Room
4.37
0.42
8.38
16.50
2,700
600
2,000
2,200
3,200
3,600
18.00
0.80
2.00
34.00
10.00
0.0200
3,500
SF/PHEP
LF/PHEP
SF/PHEP
SF/PHEP
SF/PHEP
SF/Gate
SF/Gate
SF/Gate
SF/Gate
SF/Gate
SF/Gate
SF/PHTP
LF/PHTP
SF/PHTP
SF/PHEP
SF/PHTP
SF/ANNEP
SF/Club
Concessions Space
Food/Beverage
News/Gift/Sundry
Rental Car
Other Revenue
0.0126
0.0030
0.0020
SF/ANNEP
SF/ANNEP
SF/ANNEP
SF/ANNEP
Comparable airports
Comparable airports
N/A
Comparable airports
45.00
SF/PHTP
Comparable airports
45.00
SF/PHEP
Comparable airports
1,400
2,100
3.80
-
SF/Chkpt
SF/Gate
SF/PHP
SF/ANNEP
8.00
0.0300
3.80
0.0012
SF/PHEP
SF/PHTP
SF/ANNEP
SF/PHP
SF/ANNEP
20 feet deep
Included in HM Customs and Immigrations
Comparable airports
Comparable airports
Existing factor
Non-Public Area
Airport Administration
Circulation
Airport Police
Maintenance & Miscellaneous
Mechanical/Electrical/Bldg. Systems
6.50%
4.00%
0.77%
0.59%
10.00%
Of Total SF
Of Total SF
Of Total SF
Of Total SF
Of Total SF
See Note 1.
See Note 2.
Existing percentage of total area.
Existing percentage of total area.
Comparable airports
Notes: (1) Existing area increase of Administration area over planning period is assumed to be less proportional to increase in total building area.
(2) Existing area increase of Non-Public Circulation over planning period is assumed to be less proportional to increase in total building area.
Source: HNTB analysis, October 2005.
3-25
Master Plan
Table 3.11
Passenger Terminal Building - Capacity Analysis
Base Forecast Scenario
Space
Airline Functions
Ticket Counter - SF
Ticket Counter - LF
Ticket Counter Queuing
Airline Ticket Office
Curbside Baggage Check
Departure Lounge (Gates)
Baggage Claim (SF)
Baggage Claim (LF)
Baggage Service/Storage
Outbound Baggage
Inbound Baggage
Operations/Maintenance/Storage
Clubs/VIP Room
Subtotal Airline Functions
Concessions Space
Food/Beverage
News/Gift/Sundry
Rental Car
Other Revenue
Subtotal Concessions Space
LF
274
SF
Planning Factor
2,594
0
4,970
9,518
15,326
10,284
0
950
19,962
3,499
7,639
9,230
83,972
4.37
0.42
8.38
16.50
2,700
18.00
0.80
2.00
34.00
10.00
0.0200
3,500
SF/PHEP
LF/PHEP
SF/PHEP
SF/PHEP
SF/PHEP
SF/Gate
SF/PHTP
LF/PHTP
SF/PHTP
SF/PHEP
SF/PHTP
SF/ANNEP
SF/Club
5,301
9,746
6,584
21,631
0.0126
0.0030
0.0020
SF/ANNEP
SF/ANNEP
SF/ANNEP
SF/ANNEP
594
653
594
577
6
Existing Demand
0
572
588
350
381,950
3
PHEP
PHEP
PHEP
PHEP
PHEP
Gates
PHTP
PHTP
PHTP
PHEP
PHTP
ANNEP
Clubs
593
593
593
593
6
633
633
633
593
633
419,835
2
PHEP
PHEP
PHEP
PHEP
PHEP
Gates
PHTP
PHTP
PHTP
PHEP
PHTP
ANNEP
Clubs
420,715
3,248,667
3,292,000
ANNEP
ANNEP
ANNEP
ANNEP
419,835
419,835
419,835
ANNEP
ANNEP
ANNEP
ANNEP
21,984
45.00 SF/PHTP
489 PHTP
633 PHTP
21,601
43,585
45.00 SF/PHEP
481 PHEP
593 PHEP
1,432
12,835
1,055
15,322
1,400
2,100
3.80
-
SF/Chkpt
SF/Gate
SF/PHP
SF/ANNEP
2
7
278
-
3
6
853
-
14,931
18,792
3,239
494
37,456
8.00
0.0300
3.80
0.0012
SF/PHEP
SF/PHTP
SF/ANNEP
SF/PHP
SF/ANNEP
1,867
626,400
853
411,667
PHEP
PHTP
ANNEP
PHP
ANNEP
Non-Public Area
Airport Administration
Circulation
Police Station
Maintenance & Miscellaneous
Mechanical/Electrical/Building Systems
Subtotal Non-Public Area
16,155
10,759
1,815
1,389
4,237
34,355
6.50%
4.00%
0.77%
0.59%
10.00%
Of Total SF
Of Total SF
Of Total SF
Of Total SF
Of Total SF
248,539
268,975
235,715
235,424
42,370
SF Facility
SF Facility
SF Facility
SF Facility
SF Facility
236,321
3-26
Checkpoint
Gates
PHP
ANNEP
593
419,835
853
419,835
16,155
10,759
1,815
1,389
4,237
Checkpoints
Gates
PHP
0
PHEP
PHTP
ANNEP
PHP
ANNEP
As Required
As Required
As Required
Total SF
Total SF
Master Plan
Passenger Screening
The security screening checkpoint
(SSCP)
consists
of
x-ray
units,
magnetometers and inspection areas to
screen passengers prior to access to the
concourse or departure gate area.
Placement of the SSCP delineates secure and
non-secure areas of the facility. Demand on
the SSCP is a result of peak hour enplaning
passengers and simultaneous enplaning
operations. Facility requirements for the
SSCP were based on the following:
Primary SSCP
lane
Selectee Screening
3-27
Master Plan
Airline Function
Facility Requirements
Terminal Building
3.5.2
3-28
Master Plan
Table 3.12
Passenger Terminal Building - Facility Requirements 2010
Base Forecast Scenario
Space
Demand Level
Planning Factor
SF
% of Total
2,588
0.96%
4,961
9,768
0
21,600
11,799
1.84%
3.62%
0.00%
8.00%
4.37%
1,311
20,128
6,555
9,783
9,230
97,723
0.49%
7.46%
2.43%
3.62%
3.42%
36.20%
6,163
1,468
0
979
8,610
2.28%
0.54%
0.00%
0.36%
3.19%
29,498
10.93%
26,640
56,138
9.87%
20.80%
# SF/Chkpt
# SF/Gate
# SF/PHP
# SF/ANNEP
4,200
16,800
3,327
0
24,327
1.56%
6.22%
1.23%
0.00%
9.01%
Airline Functions
Ticket Counter - SF
Ticket Counter - LF
Ticket Counter Queuing
Airline Ticket Office
Curbside Baggage Check
Departure Lounge (Gates) (1)
Baggage Claim (SF)
Baggage Claim (LF)
Baggage Service/Storage
Outbound Baggage
Inbound Baggage
Operations/Maintenance/Storage
Clubs/VIP Room
Subtotal Airline Functions
592 PHEP
592 PHEP
592 PHEP
592 PHEP
- PHEP
8 # Gates
656 PHTP
656 PHTP
656 PHTP
592 PHEP
656 PHTP
489,117 ANNEP
3 Clubs
4.37
0.42
8.38
16.50
2,700
18.00
0.80
2.00
34.00
10.00
0.0200
3,500
# SF/PHEP
# LF/PHEP
# SF/PHEP
# SF/PHEP
# SF/PHEP
# SF/Gate
# SF/PHTP
# LF/PHTP
# SF/PHTP
# SF/PHEP
# SF/PHTP
# SF/ANNEP
# SF/Club
Concessions Space
Food/Beverage
News/Gift/Sundry
Rental Car
Other Revenue
Subtotal Concessions Space
489,117
489,117
489,117
489,117
0.0126
0.0030
0.0020
#
#
#
#
656
592
ANNEP
ANNEP
ANNEP
ANNEP
PHTP
LF
249
525
SF/ANNEP
SF/ANNEP
SF/ANNEP
SF/ANNEP
PHEP
45.00 # SF/PHTP
#
45.00 # SF/PHEP
3
8
876
489,117
Chkpt
Gates
PHP
ANNEP
1,400
2,100
3.80
-
592
489,117
876
489,117
PHEP
PHTP
ANNEP
PHP
ANNEP
8.00
0.0300
3.80
0.0012
#
#
#
#
#
SF/PHEP
SF/PHTP
SF/ANNEP
SF/PHP
SF/ANNEP
4,736
0
14,674
3,327
587
23,324
1.75%
0.00%
5.44%
1.23%
0.22%
8.64%
Total SF
Total SF
Total SF
Total SF
Total SF
6.50%
4.00%
0.77%
0.59%
10.00%
# Of Total SF
# Of Total SF
# Of Total SF
# Of Total SF
# Of Total SF
17,797
10,952
2,097
1,604
27,380
59,830
6.59%
4.06%
0.78%
0.59%
10.14%
22.16%
269,952
100%
Non-Public Area
Airport Administration
Circulation
Police Station
Maintenance & Miscellaneous
Mechanical/Electrical/Building Systems
Subtotal Non-Public Area
Total All Areas
Notes: (1) Assumed gate requirements are based on anticipated peak period requirements and input from DAO.
(2) Non-secure Public Circulation -Baggage Claim is included in HM Customs and Immigration.
Source: HNTB analysis.
3-29
Master Plan
Table 3.13
Passenger Terminal Building - Facility Requirements 2015
Base Forecast Scenario
Space
Airline Functions
Ticket Counter - SF
Ticket Counter - LF
Ticket Counter Queuing
Airline Ticket Office
Curbside Baggage Check
Departure Lounge (Gates) (1)
Baggage Claim (SF)
Baggage Claim (LF)
Baggage Service/Storage
Outbound Baggage
Inbound Baggage
Operations/Maintenance/Storage
Clubs/VIP Room
Subtotal Airline Functions
Concessions Space
Food/Beverage
News/Gift/Sundry
Rental Car
Other Revenue
Subtotal Concessions Space
HM Customs and Immigrations
Customs/Immigrations/Support
US Customs and Border Protection
US Pre-clear
Subtotal HM and Customs
Demand Level
591
591
591
591
Planning Factor
8
678
678
678
591
678
525,554
3
PHEP
PHEP
PHEP
PHEP
PHEP
Gates
PHTP
PHTP
PHTP
PHEP
PHTP
ANNEP
Club
4.37
0.42
8.38
16.50
2,700
18.00
0.80
2.00
34.00
10.00
0.0200
3,500
525,554
525,554
525,554
525,554
ANNEP
ANNEP
ANNEP
ANNEP
0.0126
0.0030
0.0020
678
591
PHTP
SF/PHEP
SF/PHEP
SF/PHEP
SF/PHEP
SF/PHEP
SF/Gate
SF/PHTP
SF/PHTP
SF/PHTP
SF/PHEP
SF/PHTP
SF/ANNEP
SF/Club
#
#
#
#
LF
PHEP
% of Total
2,583
0.93%
4,953
9,752
0
21,600
12,204
1.79%
3.52%
0.00%
7.80%
4.41%
1,356
20,094
6,780
10,512
10,500
100,334
0.49%
7.25%
2.45%
3.79%
3.79%
36.22%
6,622
1,577
0
1,052
9,251
2.39%
0.57%
0.00%
0.38%
3.34%
30,510
11.01%
26,595
57,105
9.60%
20.61%
248
543
SF/ANNEP
SF/ANNEP
SF/ANNEP
SF/ANNEP
45.00 # SF/PHTP
#
45.00 # SF/PHEP
SF
3
8
898
525,554
Chkpt
Gates
PHP
ANNEP
1,400
2,100
3.80
-
#
#
#
#
SF/Chkpt
SF/Gate
SF/PHP
SF/ANNEP
4,200
16,800
3,413
0
24,413
1.52%
6.06%
1.23%
0.00%
8.81%
591
3,921
525,554
898
525,554
PHEP
PHTP
ANNEP
PHP
ANNEP
8.00
0.0300
3.80
0.0012
#
#
#
#
#
SF/PHEP
SF/PHTP
SF/ANNEP
SF/PHP
SF/ANNEP
4,728
0
15,767
3,413
631
24,539
1.71%
0.00%
5.69%
1.23%
0.23%
8.86%
Total SF
Total SF
Total SF
Total SF
Total SF
6.50%
4.00%
0.77%
0.59%
10.00%
#
#
#
#
#
Of Total SF
Of Total SF
Of Total SF
Of Total SF
Of Total SF
18,258
11,236
2,163
1,657
28,089
61,403
6.59%
4.06%
0.78%
0.60%
10.14%
22.16%
277,045
100%
Non-Public Area
Airport Administration
Circulation
Police Station
Maintenance & Miscellaneous
Mechanical/Electrical/Building Systems
Subtotal Non-Public Area
Total All Areas
Notes: (1) Assumed gate requirements are based on anticipated peak period requirements and input from DAO.
(2) Non-secure Public Circulation -Baggage Claim is included in HM Customs and Immigration.
Source: HNTB analysis.
3-30
Master Plan
Table 3.14
Passenger Terminal Building - Facility Requirements 2020
Base Forecast Scenario
Space
Airline Functions
Ticket Counter - SF
Ticket Counter - LF
Ticket Counter Queuing
Airline Ticket Office
Curbside Baggage Check
Departure Lounge (Gates) (1)
Baggage Claim (SF)
Baggage Claim (LF)
Baggage Service/Storage
Outbound Baggage
Inbound Baggage
Operations/Maintenance/Storage
Clubs/VIP Room
Subtotal Airline Functions
Concessions Space
Food/Beverage
News/Gift/Sundry
Rental Car
Other Revenue
Subtotal Concessions Space
HM Customs and Immigrations
Customs/Immigrations/Support
US Customs and Border Protection
US Pre-clear
Subtotal HM and US Customs
Demand Level
597
597
597
597
Planning Factor
9
685
685
685
597
685
569,657
3
PHEP
PHEP
PHEP
PHEP
PHEP
Gates
PHTP
PHTP
PHTP
PHEP
PHTP
ANNEP
Club
4.37
0.42
8.38
16.50
2,700
18.00
0.80
2.00
34.00
10.00
0.0200
3,500
SF/PHEP
LF/PHEP
SF/PHEP
SF/PHEP
SF/PHEP
SF/Gate
SF/PHTP
LF/PHTP
SF/PHTP
SF/PHEP
SF/PHTP
SF/ANNEP
SF/Club
569,657
569,657
569,657
569,657
ANNEP
ANNEP
ANNEP
ANNEP
0.0126
0.0030
0.0020
SF/ANNEP
SF/ANNEP
SF/ANNEP
SF/ANNEP
685
PHTP
45.00
LF
SF
% of Total
2,609
0.90%
5,003
9,851
0
24,300
12,321
1.73%
3.40%
0.00%
8.40%
4.26%
1,369
20,298
6,845
11,394
10,500
104,490
0.47%
7.01%
2.37%
3.94%
3.63%
36.11%
7,178
1,709
0
1,140
10,027
2.48%
0.59%
0.00%
0.39%
3.47%
30,803
10.65%
251
548
SF/PHTP
`
597
PHEP
45.00
SF/PHEP
26,865
57,668
9.28%
19.93%
3
9
963
569,657
Chkpt
Gates
PHP
ANNEP
1,400
2,100
3.80
-
SF/Chkpt
SF/Gate
SF/PHP
SF/ANNEP
4,200
18,900
3,658
0
26,758
1.45%
6.53%
1.26%
0.00%
9.25%
597
685
569,657
963
569,657
PHEP
PHTP
ANNEP
PHP
ANNEP
8.00
0.0300
3.80
0.0012
SF/PHEP
SF/PHTP
SF/ANNEP
SF/PHP
SF/ANNEP
4,776
0
17,090
3,658
684
26,208
1.65%
0.00%
5.91%
1.26%
0.24%
9.06%
Total SF
Total SF
Total SF
Total SF
Total SF
6.50%
4.00%
0.77%
0.59%
10.00%
Of Total SF
Of Total SF
Of Total SF
Of Total SF
Of Total SF
19,086
11,745
2,273
1,742
29,362
64,208
6.60%
4.06%
0.79%
0.60%
10.15%
22.19%
289,359
100%
Non-Public Area
Airport Administration
Circulation
Police Station
Maintenance & Miscellaneous
Mechanical/Electrical/Building Systems
Subtotal Non-Public Area
Total All Areas
Notes: (1) Assumed gate requirements are based on anticipated peak period requirements and input from DAO.
(2) Non-secure Public Circulation -Baggage Claim is included in HM Customs and Immigration.
Source: HNTB analysis
Source: HNTB analysis.
3-31
Master Plan
Table 3.15
Passenger Terminal Building - Facility Requirements 2025
Base Forecast Scenario
Space
Airline Functions
Ticket Counter - SF
Ticket Counter - LF
Ticket Counter Queuing
Airline Ticket Office
Curbside Baggage Check
Departure Lounge (Gates) (1)
Baggage Claim (SF)
Baggage Claim (LF)
Baggage Service/Storage
Outbound Baggage
Inbound Baggage
Operations/Maintenance/Storage
Clubs/VIP Room
Subtotal Airline Functions
Concessions Space
Food/Beverage
News/Gift/Sundry
Rental Car
Other Revenue
Subtotal Concessions Space
HM Customs and Immigrations
Customs/Immigrations/Support
US Customs and Border Protection
US Pre-clear
Subtotal HM and US Customs
Demand Level
603
603
603
603
Planning Factor
9
691
691
691
603
691
623,825
3
PHEP
PHEP
PHEP
PHEP
PHEP
Gates
PHTP
PHTP
PHTP
PHEP
PHTP
ANNEP
Club
4.37
0.42
8.38
16.50
2,700
18.00
0.80
2.00
34.00
10.00
0.0200
3,500
SF/PHEP
LF/PHEP
SF/PHEP
SF/PHEP
SF/PHEP
SF/Gate
SF/PHTP
LF/PHTP
SF/PHTP
SF/PHEP
SF/PHTP
SF/ANNEP
SF/Club
623,825
623,825
623,825
623,825
ANNEP
ANNEP
ANNEP
ANNEP
0.0126
0.0030
SF/ANNEP
SF/ANNEP
SF/ANNEP
SF/ANNEP
691
0.0020
PHTP
45.00
LF
SF
% of Total
2,636
0.89%
5,054
9,950
0
24,300
12,438
1.71%
3.36%
0.00%
8.21%
4.20%
1,382
20,502
6,910
12,477
10,500
106,149
0.47%
6.93%
2.33%
4.22%
3.55%
35.86%
7,861
1,872
0
1,248
10,981
2.66%
0.63%
0.00%
0.42%
3.71%
31,095
10.50%
253
553
SF/PHTP
`
603
PHEP
45.00
SF/PHEP
27,135
58,230
9.17%
19.67%
3
9
1,027
623,825
Chkpt
Gates
PHP
ANNEP
1,400
2,100
3.80
-
SF/Chkpt
SF/Gate
SF/PHP
SF/ANNEP
4,200
18,900
3,903
0
27,003
1.42%
6.39%
1.32%
0.00%
9.12%
603
691
623,825
1,027
623,825
PHEP
PHTP
ANNEP
PHP
ANNEP
8.00
0.0300
3.80
0.0012
SF/PHEP
SF/PHTP
SF/ANNEP
SF/PHP
SF/ANNEP
4,824
0
18,715
3,903
749
28,191
1.63%
0.00%
6.32%
1.32%
0.25%
9.52%
Total SF
Total SF
Total SF
Total SF
Total SF
6.50%
4.00%
0.77%
0.59%
10.00%
Of Total SF
Of Total SF
Of Total SF
Of Total SF
Of Total SF
19,467
11,979
2,298
1,755
29,949
65,448
6.58%
4.05%
0.78%
0.59%
10.12%
22.11%
296,002
100%
Non-Public Area
Airport Administration
Circulation
Police Station
Maintenance & Miscellaneous
Mechanical/Electrical/Building Systems
Subtotal Non-Public Area
Total All Areas
Notes: (1) Assumed gate requirements are based on anticipated peak period requirements and input from DAO.
(2) Non-secure Public Circulation -Baggage Claim is included in HM Customs and Immigration.
Source: HNTB analysis.
3-32
Master Plan
Concessions Space
Concessions space includes food and
beverage establishments, news/gift/sundry
stands and shops, duty free shops, and other
revenue-generating
space
such
as
telephones, advertisement kiosks and
ground transportation service areas. Facility
requirements for these areas were projected
using a detailed concessions planning
approach that focuses on enplaned
passenger levels, and their propensity to
shop while in an airport. The projected
facility requirements for food and beverage
concessions yield a deficiency of
approximately 87 square feet by 2025.
However, news, gifts and sundry items, and
other revenue generating concessions areas
are projected to be in excess of required area
by as much as 2,900 square feet in 2010,
decreasing to a surplus of nearly 900 square
feet by 2025. A deficiency in other revenueproducing space (advertising, travel agency,
other services) of approximately 3,200
square feet is expected by 2025. In all, a
deficiency of approximately 2,400 square
feet in concessions space is expected by
2025.
Master Plan
3-34
Master Plan
3.5.3
Master Plan
3.5.4
3.6
3.6.1
SURFACE
TRANSPORTATION AND
PARKING REQUIREMENTS
Summary
Master Plan
Table 3.16
Estimated Gate and Position Requirements (1)
Common Use
Preferential
Existing Gates/
Positions
2010
2015
2020
2025
8
-
6
8
6
8
6
9
6
9
Note: (1) Based on projected peak period requirements and input from DAO.
Source: HNTB analysis. Projection of Gate requirements based on 2005 OAG schedule and derivative schedules
in Forecast Appendix A.
3-37
Master Plan
Terminal Curbside
3.6.3
Parking Requirements
3-38
Master Plan
Table 3.17
Car Park Requirements
Existing
Capacity (1)
Spaces
SF
Public Car Park
Short Term Car Park
Long Term Car Park
Cycle spaces (adj. STCP)
Overflow (3)
Curb (linear feet, not SF)
Other Car Park
Staff Car Park
Managers Car Park
Taxi Hold
2005
Spaces
SF (2)
2010
Spaces
SF
Required
2015
Spaces
SF
2020
Spaces
SF
2025
Spaces
SF
75
107
54
100
20
35,925
49,093
2,450
35,000
300
75
107
54
100
11
33,750
48,150
2,160
45,000
(165)
82
117
70
109
12
36,900
52,650
2,800
49,050
(180)
89
127
87
118
13
40,050
57,150
3,480
53,100
(195)
96
137
103
127
14
43,200
61,650
4,120
57,150
(210)
103
147
120
137
15
46,350
66,150
4,800
61,650
(225)
100
28
130
34,474
13,327
23,262
100
28
50
35,000
9,800
10,000
110
31
54
38,500
10,850
10,800
120
35
59
42,000
12,250
11,800
131
39
63
45,850
13,650
12,600
142
43
69
49,700
15,050
13,800
Notes: (1) Existing Capacity and 2005 base year data from July 2005 HNTB field observations.
(2) Space requirements assume 350 SF per space for Staff, Managers, and Overflow Car Parks; 450 SF per space for
Short Term and Long Term Car Parks; 200 SF per space for Taxi Hold; and 15 LF per space for Curb.
(3) The area of the Overflow Car Park could not be determined. Number of spaces was estimated during July 2005 HNTB field observations.
Source: HNTB analysis.
3-39
Master Plan
Cycle spaces:
Cycle parking by
observation and anecdote is not
adequate today. Based on observed
3-40
Master Plan
3.7
AIR CARGO
3-41
Master Plan
Table 3.18
Air Cargo Requirements
Facility Type
Building
Square Feet
Square Metres
Ramp
Aircraft Positions
ICAO Code Letter C (2)
ICAO Code Letter D (3)
Total
Area (4)
Square Yards
Square Metres
Site (5)
Acres
Hectares
Existing
2004/05
2010
21,200 (1)
1,972 (1)
1
0
1
25,070
2,332
1
0
1
Required
2015
30,220
2,810
2
0
2
2020
36,430
3,388
1
1
2
2025
43,920
4,085
1
1
2
16,530
13,819
6,190
5,175
11,300
9,447
15,740
13,159
15,740
13,159
5.3
2.1
3.1
1.2
5.2
2.1
6.7
2.7
7.7
3.1
3-42
Master Plan
3.8.1
3.8
GA Terminal
GENERAL AVIATION
FACILITIES
29
3-43
Master Plan
Table 3.19
General Aviation Requirements
Existing
2004/05
Location/Facility
GA Terminal Building
Square Feet
Square Metres
2005
2010
Required
2015
2020
2025
1,076
100
1,076
100
1,090
101
1,388
129
1,751
163
2,212
206
25
15
15
19
24
31
375
310
380
320
484
400
610
510
771
640
3
11
1
15
3
11
1
15
4
15
1
20
5
19
1
25
6
24
2
32
8
30
2
40
35,100
29,344
39,000
32,600
52,160
43,610
61,320
51,260
75,720
63,300
87,500
73,150
8,800
820
8,800
820
11,000
1,020
13,200
1,230
15,400
1,430
880
740
880
740
1,100
920
1,320
1,100
1,540
1,290
N/A
10
12
14
N/A
N/A
150
130
200
170
250
210
300
250
350
290
9
4
12
5
15
6
18
7
21
8
Auto Parking
Spaces
Lot Size
Square Yards
Square Metres
625 (1)
520
(4)
Auto Parking
Spaces
(5)
Area
Square Yards
Square Metres
3-44
3.8.2
Master Plan
3.8.4
GA Apron Requirements
3.9
3.9.1
SUPPORT FACILITIES
Maintenance Facilities
The DAO has a 1,750-square foot (160square metre) building for an office and
workshop for terminal-related maintenance.
The Airport is currently constructing
two 7,000-square foot (650-square metre)
buildings, one near the former post office
and kitchen area and a second near the BASSerco buildings to store all airfield
maintenance equipment. The two facilities
are scheduled for completion in the next
several months. Recognising that no new
significant airfield improvements have been
identified, these two facilities should be
sufficient to accommodate 20-year airfield
maintenance needs.
GA Hangar Requirements
3.9.2
3-45
Master Plan
ARFF Facilities
3-46
Master Plan
Table 3.20
Fuel Storage Requirements
Based on Five-day Peak Month Reserve
Existing
Capacity (Gallons)
GA
Air Carrier
Total
Site Requirement
Acres
Hectares
40,500 (1)
109,500 (2)
150,000
8,265
0.5
0.2
2005
2010
2015
2020
2025
40,500
109,500
150,000
53,600
123,800
177,400
67,700
146,600
214,300
85,600
176,600
262,200
108,100
216,200
324,300
0.5
0.2
0.6
0.2
12,467
0.7
0.3
0.8
0.3
1.0
0.4
Notes: (1) Assumes 27 percent requirement for GA, based on discussions with Shell Oil representative.
GA fuel storage requirement forecast to increase at same rate as GA operations.
(2) Assumes 73 percent of total requirement for air carrier based on discussions with Shell Oil
representative. Air carrier requirement forecast to increase at same rate as non-U.S. seat
departures.
Source: HNTB analysis.
3-47
Master Plan
3.11 UTILITIES
Since the utilities serving the existing
terminal area accommodated activity levels
that are higher than forecasted as part of this
Master Plan, they should be adequate to
accommodate long-term demand.
3-48
Master Plan
Table 3.21
Useful Life Analysis
of Airport Physical Assets (Except Terminal and Pavements)
Asset Number
(Old)
(New)
114
115
116
330
0637
331
0639
341
0629 (1)
397
443
444
446
706
0628
956 (2)
966 (2)
967 (2)
968 (2)
1014
0627
1035
1092
1038
1095
1039
1096
1048
1093
1058
1076
1079
1101
1104
1162
0638
1166
0652
1421
1438
0642
1439
0644
1574
0630
2
0631
0632
0633
0634
0635
0636
0640
0641
0643 (3)
0645
0646
0647
0648
0649
0650
0651
1089
1090
1091
Name
EMER GENERATOR F/WEATHER
ELECT DISB. FOR WEATHER
WEATHER RADAR
FIRE CRASH RESCUE (CFR)
BAS SERCO OFFICES
ATC TOWER
EMER PWR PLT/TRANSFORMER
ANTENNA
ANTENNA
ANTENNA
ANTENNA FARM AND GENERATOR
ACFT WASHRACK-PAVEMENT
ACFT PUMP STATION
ACFT WASHRACK TANK
ACFT PUMP STATION
HELICOPTER BUILDING
WIND SOCK 12 END
STD BY GEN/TRANSFORMER
APPROACH LIGHTING 30 END NAV AIDS
WIND SOCK 30 END
TRANSFORMER VAULT 75KVA
EMERGENCY GENERATOR BUILDING
AIR OPS/NOCF
AVIONICS BUILDING/SUPPLY GND E
TV VAULT 375 KVA
COMBINED FIRE/RESCUE BLDG
HANGAR BUILDING/GENERATOR
AIR SURVEILLANCE RADAR-7
ILS BUILDING/ANTENNA
INST APPLIED GLIDE SLOPE/ANTENNA
MET OFFICE/GES OFFICES
TAXI OPERATOR BUILDING
ASB/BAS WORKSHOP
AIRPORT KITCHEN
CAT AIR COURIER BLDG
CAT SECURITY GATE 102
CAT DAO MAINTENANCE
REFUELING BUILDING
MAIN TERMINAL BUILDING
CUSTOMS WAREHOUSE
TRANSFORMER VAULTS AND AIR
TERMINAL GENERATORS
AIRFIELD LIGHTING TRANSFORMER
VAULT AND GENERATOR
POST OFFICE SORTING BUILDING
ATC VAULT/GENERATOR
S DOPPLER WEATHER RADAR
SITE/VAULT
BELCO TRANSFORMER VAULT
SECURITY GATE 103
OLD WEATHER RADAR ANTENNA/
BUILDING/VAULT
4 ANTENNAS AT RTR SITE
VOR BUILDING/GENERATOR BUILDING
Year
Built
1957
N/A
1957
1959
1959
1953
1953
1968
1968
1968
1955
1959
1988
1988
1988
1959
1988
1965
1988
1954
1966
1942
1990
1957
1992
1992
1973
1975
1975
1981
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
2004
2004
1980s/2004
2005
2005
2000/2004
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Additional
Rehabilitation
Possible?
Yes
N/A
No
Yes
Yes
Sched. For 2006
Yes
No
No
No
Yes
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
BLDC
BLDC
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
2004
Yes
Year
Rehabilitated
2003
N/A
1987/2005
1998/2003
1990
1987/1999
1987/2003
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
2005
est. 1988
2004
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
2005
N/A
2005
N/A
N/A
Sched 2006
N/A
N/A
1955
1987
2003
N/A
2003
N/A
1094
331 GUARD HOUSE
1988
2003
Notes: (1) Depending upon future development, may be an obstruction and relocation would be required.
(2) Facilities 956, 966, 967, and 968 are currently leased to Bermuda Youth and Sports.
(3) Due to other planning issues, may be relocated prior to end of useful life.
Source: Department of Airport Operations.
3-49
2015
2025
Utility
2025
Utility
Yes
2030
Industrial
Utility
Yes
2030
Utility
Yes
Yes
2030
2030
Utility
Public Safety
Yes
2025
Utility
N/A
Yes
Yes
Yes
N/A
2030
2030
2020
Utility
Utility
Utility
Public Safety
Yes
Yes
Estimated
Life End
2018
N/A
N/A
2040
2038
2030
2030
N/A
N/A
N/A
2030
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
2035
2015
2025
2030
2015
2015
2025
2025
2045
2025
2040
2035
2035
2030
2012
2025
2010
2015
2030
2025
2025
Construction
Materials
Conc Block/Conc Roof
Conc Block/Conc Roof
Conc Block/Conc Roof
Conc Block/Steeldeck Roof
Conc Block/Conc Roof
Conc Block/Steeldeck Roof
Conc Block/Conc Roof
140x87x29
17x17x15
Conc Block/Conc Roof
23x21x40/
11x9x8
5x5x9
Master Plan
3-50
Master Plan
CONCEPTS
Chapter Four
CONCEPTS
4.1
INTRODUCTION
4.2
OPPORTUNITIES AND
CONSTRAINTS
4-1
Figure 4-1
Master Plan
4.4.1
4.3
OVERALL PLANNING
STRATEGY
4.4
NEW TERMINAL
DEVELOPMENT ANALYSIS
4.4.2
Figure 4-2
Figure 4-3
NATO Site
West Site
Figure 4-4
Weapons Pier
(Not Considered)
Apron V
(Not Considered)
N
West Site
Example Layout
NATO Site
N
To
Ferry
Stop
Example Layout
Figure 4-5
Master Plan
differentiator
with
other
island
destinations, aesthetics/enhancement of
Bermuda
Image,
and
green/
sustainability);
Operational
efficiency
(including
average delay per aircraft operation,
average taxi distance, and average
number of runway crossings by aircraft
and ground vehicles); and
Evaluation Criteria
4-3
Master Plan
Table 4.1
Screening of New Terminal Development Sites (1)
(1 of 2)
Western
Site
Former NATO
Site
Similar
Similar
Walkable to terminal
Yes
No
17+
12
Very good
Limited
No change in impacts
More impacts
Less opportunity
More opportunity
Similar
Similar
Category
Criteria
Terminal
Customer Service
Expandability/
Flexibility
Support of Local/
National Goals and
Consistency with
National Plans
Green/Sustainability
Storm Protection
Cost
Operational Efficiency
Similar (5)
Similar (5)
4-4
Master Plan
Category
New
Terminal
Redevelopment of
Existing Terminal
No
Yes
Criteria
Requires Land from BLDC
Impact on Existing Civil Terminal
Airline Fuelling
2
3
4
0
0
1
4
0
0
1
1
0
2
6
Notes: (1) Criterion where one site has clear advantage indicated by green color.
(2) Depending on site option selected.
(3) Terminal at western site would be designed to withstand Category 4 storm.
(4) At this phase, order-of-magnitude costs appear similar for both alternatives.
(5) Assumes taxiway improvements to eliminate head-to-head conflicts.
Sources: HNTB, C&G and UII analysis.
4-5
Master Plan
Customer Service
Both new terminal sites would be
designed to provide optimal customer
service. However, a facility located on the
western side of the Airport would have a
lower average ground access travel time for
the majority of users, saving, on average, as
much as 10 percent to 15 percent of their
total access time compared to a terminal at
the NATO site. A western site would also
afford superior opportunities to connect to
water transportation, which is anticipated to
play a larger role in the future, especially for
visitor transportation.
Master Plan
Operational Efficiency
Three measures of operational efficiency
were considered: average taxi distance,
4-7
Master Plan
4.4.3
Replacement Terminal
Configuration Analysis
4-8
1000
0m
0m
200m
Option A
Figure 4-6
Option B
1000
200m
0
0m
Option C
1000
200m
Master Plan
separate
second
holdroom area.
level
international
4-9
Figure 4-7
100 200
Feet
Master Plan
Customer service,
Flexibility,
Expandability,
Cost,
Phasing/impact
functions.
of
Airport
other
Following is a
evaluation process.
on
the
Evaluation Criteria
Eight general evaluation criteria were
identified and are presented in rank order of
priority:
4-10
100 200
Feet
Figure 4-8
Figure 4-9
Master Plan
Advantage: Option C.
Support of Local and National Goals and
Compatibility of National Plans
Option A would permit the greatest
opportunities to redevelop the area to the
south (the site of the existing terminal). It
would present excellent views from the
concourse to the south.
Advantage: Option C.
With Option B, ground traffic
approaching the Airport from the
bridge/causeway would be afforded a
striking view of the terminal.
Expandability
Consideration was given to long-term
expansion capability (beyond the 20-year
planning horizon of this Study). Landside,
terminal, and concourse expandability were
all examined in this analysis.
Advantage: Option C.
Storm Protection
A proposed linear terminal located on
the far north of the western site (Option A)
provides the best natural protection against
a storm surge associated with hurricane
conditions. However, given the proposed
location of the pier terminal, breakwater
4-11
Master Plan
Advantage: Option A.
Cost
Operational Efficiency
For all three options, it was assumed that
air cargo facilities would be located in the
vicinity of the new terminal, while GA
facilities would be relocated to the north side
of the airfield (most likely at the former
NATO site). For this reason, operational
efficiency focused on commercial passenger
operations. In this regard, Option A is the
least efficient because it would only provide
single aircraft taxi flow into and out of the
terminal area (similar to the constraint at the
current Civil Terminal). Options B and C
were both considered to be equally efficient.
Advantage: Option C.
Summary and Preliminary New Terminal
Site Recommendation
While all three options would provide
good customer service, Option C appears to
be the superior layout for a redeveloped
terminal as it would provide the greatest
expandability potential, would best support
local and national goals, would have the
lowest terminal construction cost, and
4-12
Master Plan
General Aviation
The recommended site for a new
terminal would require the displacement of
the Executive Jet Facility (GA). Second in
size to long-term passenger terminal
facilities, GA is anticipated to require a
significant amount of land area: about 21
acres (8.5 hectares). As such, it was this
element of the Airport that was addressed
next.
4-13
Master Plan
Other Facilities
Air Cargo
4.5
Although land requirements for future
air cargo facilities will be less than those for
GA, much of the same siting criteria apply to
this element of the Airport. Additionally, it
is desirable from an adjacency perspective to
locate cargo facilities in the vicinity of the
passenger terminal, since a significant
portion of air freight is carried aboard
passenger aircraft. A site on the north side
of the runway (i.e., in the vicinity of the
former NATO facility) was therefore not
considered, as it would require the transport
of large amounts of cargo across the airfield.
The only practical sites for long term cargo
development appear to be east of the flight
kitchen or at the site of the current Civil
Terminal.
REDEVELOPMENT OF
EXISTING TERMINAL
A
considerable
number
of
improvements have been made to the Civil
Terminal since it was transferred to the
Bermudian Government.
The current
layout is a two-storey facility totalling
approximately 237,000 square feet in area. It
is a compilation of additions, which includes
everything from wood frame to concrete
structures, as well as unrelated functional
areas caused by changes in the industry and
the avoidance of a comprehensive
refurbishment of the facility.
The Civil Terminal is at an elevation and
location which is subject to flooding and
damage from hurricane-force winds which
more than occasionally batter the island. To
date, the facility has been repaired following
the most recent hurricane.
Fuel Farm
Under the new terminal scenario, the
current fuel farm would be moved to a site
directly northeast of Apron II to provide a
greater opportunity for redevelopment of
the vacated terminal area.
4-14
Maintaining
operations
during
construction
(i.e.,
phasing
and
minimising impact on level of customer
service).
Master Plan
4.5.2
Preliminary Onsite
Redevelopment Strategies
Figure 4-10
Master Plan
Convert the balance of the current longterm car park into a holding, queuing,
and access route to the pre-arranged ride
loading area.
4-16
Master Plan
4.5.3
4.6
EVALUATION OF
TERMINAL
DEVELOPMENT
CONCEPTS
Evaluation Criteria
4-17
Master Plan
Sustainability potential.
Environmental Considerations
Noise impact,
Flexibility/Expandability
Terrestrial habitats,
Landside expandability/flexibility,
GA expandability/flexibility, and
Support
ibility.
facilities
Storm Protection
expandability/flex-
Cost, and
Financial Implications
enabling
4-18
Master Plan
4.6.2
Operational Efficiency
Terminal Development
Options Evaluation
Safety
Land acquisition
BLDC,
Number of relocations,
requirement
from
4-19
Master Plan
Table 4.2
Terminal Evaluation
(1 of 3)
New
Terminal
Redevelopment of
Existing Terminal
No distinguishable difference
No distinguishable difference
No distinguishable difference
No distinguishable difference
Good
Fair
11+
Landside Expandability/Flexibility
Good
Limited
Cargo Expandability/Flexibility
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
25 acres
17 acres
Good
Limited
Good
Fair
Sustainability Potential
Good
Fair
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Category
Criteria
Expandability/
Flexibility
4-20
Master Plan
Table 4.2
Terminal Evaluation
(2 of 3)
New
Terminal
Redevelopment of
Existing Terminal
Same
Same
Noise Impact
Same
Same
Terrestrial Habitats
Same
Same
Marine Habitats
Same
Same
Minimal
Minimal
$2.1 M
$1.1 M
$424 M
$476 M
$184 (Phase I)
$117 (Phase II)
$154 (Phase III)
$21 (Phase IV)
Minimal
Measurable
Measurable
None
Possible
Possible
Good
Fair
Minimal
Minimal
Good
Fair
Category
Environmental
Considerations
Criteria
Financial
Implications
Operational
Efficiency
4-21
Master Plan
Table 4.2
Terminal Evaluation
(3 of 3)
Category
Safety
Criteria
Ability to meet ICAO Recommended Design Standards
Land Acquisition Requirement from BLDC
Construction Impact on Terminal Operations
Ease of Phasing,
Impact on Ongoing
Impact on Executive Jet Facility
Airport Operations
Redevelopment of
Existing Terminal
Yes
Yes
Number of Relocations
New
Terminal
Requires relocation
No impact
No impact
No impact
No impact
4-22
Master Plan
4-23
Master Plan
Advantage:
Existing Terminal.
Redevelopment
of
Financial Implications
From nearly every measure, a new
terminal would provide more positive
financial implications compared to a
redeveloped terminal. The overall cost for a
new terminal and the resulting enabling
projects is estimated at $424 million,
compared to $476 million for a redeveloped
terminal.
Most of the difference is
attributable to the cost of construction
directly adjacent to the existing Civil
Terminal, which would entail complicated
phasing and would require multiple
relocations of tenants.
Storm Protection
Both terminal development options
would be able to be protected against a
Category 4 storm. Based on initial planning,
storm protection for the terminal area would
be accomplished by constructing a berm
along the shoreline.
Under the new terminal option, it was
assumed that the berm would extend from
the waste management facility (dump), west
past the causeway, and continue along Ferry
Reach to the east end of the runway. Under
the redeveloped terminal option, the extent
of the storm protection feature would be
limited to between the waste management
facility and the causeway.
The cost,
therefore, for providing storm surge
4-24
Master Plan
4.7
Operational Efficiency
From
an
operational
efficiency
standpoint, the two terminal development
options are similar, since aircraft delays
would be minimal under each. Average taxi
distances between the terminal and the midpoint of the runway would be slightly lower
for a new terminal compared to a
redeveloped terminal (8,400 feet versus
8,800 feet, respectively). Lastly, air traffic
controllers would have a better view of
terminal apron activity under the new
terminal option.
SUMMARY AND
RECOMMENDATION
4-25
Master Plan
RECOMMENDED PLAN
Chapter Five
RECOMMENDED PLAN
5.1
INTRODUCTION
This
Chapter
describes
the
recommended development plan for
Bermuda International Airport.
The
recommended improvements are based on
the facility requirements identified in
Chapter Three, which were, in turn, based
on the aviation activity forecasts presented
in Chapter Two. Finally, the recommended
plan reflects the alternatives analysis
described in Chapter Four of this Study, the
result of which was a recommendation to
proceed with the construction of a new
terminal.
Section 5.2 outlines the overall planning
strategy used to develop the recommended
plan. Section 5.3 identifies the general
development areas as defined by on-airport
land use designations. A detailed discussion
of the recommended plan is presented in
Section 5.4. Lastly, Section 5.5 presents the
development cost and phasing of the plan.
5.2
5.3
The
current
Airport
boundary
encompasses 543 acres (220 hectares).
Based on future facility requirements, the
need to meet ICAO design standards, and to
ensure compatible land uses in the Airport
vicinity, the Master Plan recommends an
additional 131 acres (53 hectares) be
designated Airport property. The location
of these additional parcels include the RESA
on the west end of the runway, land adjacent
to and north of the Swing Bridge, land
adjacent to the former NATO facility, land
east of the fire station, land northeast of the
east end of Runway 30, and the peninsula
known as the Finger. To date, a move to redesignate much of this land to DAO
management is being reviewed by the
OVERALL DEVELOPMENT
STRATEGY
5-1
Master Plan
Airfield/Navaid
(AN),
including
runways, taxiways, safety areas, airfield
lighting, and on-airport navigational
aids;
Airport
Circulation/Parking
(AC),
which includes terminal car parks;
5.4
AIRPORT DEVELOPMENT
PLAN
The
Master
Plan
recommends
preserving the land on the extreme west side
of the Airport for future terminal, cargo, and
support development. The Plan further
identifies the site of the former NATO
facility as the new location for GA
(Executive Jet Terminal) facilities.
5.4.1
Airfield
Master Plan
Project Descriptions
The
Master
Plan
recommends
constructing a taxiway parallel to Taxiway
Bravo to provide two-way airfield traffic
5-3
Master Plan
west end of Runway 12-30. EMAS is a highenergy absorbing material that is designed to
reliably and predictably crush under the
weight of an aircraft. Although the U.S.
FAA has approved their use at U.S. airports,
it is not clear whether ICAO recognises its
use in situations where a standard RESA
cannot be provided. There appears to be
sufficient room at the west end of Runway
12-30 to accommodate an EMAS
installation. Although the landing distance
available for Runway 12 would need to be
reduced to 9,150 feet (2,790 metres), all
other declared distances could remain as
currently published.
Project Impacts
The airfield projects described above will
result in environmental and community
impacts. Southside Road (located on the
northeast end of the runway) will require
relocation. This portion of the road is part
of the BLDCs Proposed New Carriageway
System
Phase
2,
currently
under
construction. When completed, the BLDC
Phase 2 Plan will redirect traffic east of the
softball diamond onto McCloskey Road.
The existing Southside Road further to the
east will remain as a cycle way/pedestrian
path. The area of road to the east of the
softball diamond will be impacted by the
upgrade of the RESA off the Runway 30 end
to meet ICAO standards. The required
changes to the BLDC Phase 2 Plan will not
Rwy 30
9,713 ft.
10,266 ft.
9,153 ft.
9,153 ft.
TORA
TODA
ASDA
LDA
Notes:
TORA = Take-off Run Available
TODA = Take-off Distance Available
ASDA = Accelerate-Stop Distance Available
LDA = Landing Distance Available
5-4
Master Plan
Terminal Area
Project Description
The terminal and its associated car parks
and roadway system would be aligned
perpendicular to the current Civil Terminal.
The new terminal would feature a nine-gate
double-loaded concourse which could easily
be extended to provide additional contact
gates. Ticketing, customs, baggage claim,
and curb side access would be provided on
the ground level, while gate holdrooms and
DAO offices would be located on the first
floor. Pedestrian access would be provided
between the new terminal and a possible
Fast Ferry terminal. Figure 5-6 shows an
artist rendering of a possible concept for the
terminals interior.
5-5
Figure 5-4
Figure 5-5
Figure 5-6
Master Plan
5.4.3
strategies.
Possible strategies to be
considered during the design phase include:
Co-generation,
Solar thermal
generation,
power
hot
Air Cargo
water
5.4.4
General Aviation
Support Facilities
5-6
Master Plan
Other support facilities, such as the BASSerco maintenance shop and the flight
kitchen, are shown as continuing in their
current location.
5.5
5-7
Master Plan
Phase II (2010-2014)
Phase I (2007-2009)
In Phase I, it is anticipated that
architectural design for the new terminal
would be undertaken, along with design of
the accompanying terminal apron and
landside facilities. The total cost for these
efforts is approximately $30 million.
In addition, recognising the age and
condition of the existing air cargo/courier
facilities, the Master Plan recommends
constructing a new replacement cargo
facility in this time period. The total cost of
the new cargo facility is approximately $33
million, excluding the cost of demolishing
the existing facility.
5.6
5-8
Master Plan
Table 5.1
Capital Improvement Program
Recommended Development Plan
Cost in 2006 Dollars (1)
(1 of 2)
Phase I
(2007-2009)
Project
Phase II
(2010-2014)
Phase III
(2015-2025)
Total
Redeveloped Terminal
Terminal Building
Apron
Landside
Subtotal
$
$
$
$
28,397,000 (2)
1,118,000 (2)
235,000 (2)
29,750,000
$ 369,155,000 (3)
$ 14,531,000 (3)
$
3,055,000 (3)
$ 386,741,000
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
397,552,000
15,649,000
3,290,000
416,491,000
$
$
$
$
31,500,000
1,368,000
493,000
33,361,000
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
31,500,000
1,368,000
493,000
33,361,000
$
$
$
$
$
1,680,000
2,906,000
53,000
4,639,000
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
3,711,000
3,711,000
$
$
$
$
$
1,680,000
2,906,000
3,711,000
53,000
8,350,000
Airfield Improvements
Relocate Twy Alpha (West)
Relocate Twy Alpha (Center)
Relocate Twy Alpha (East)
Remove Old Twy Alpha (Entire)
Reconstruct Twy Charlie as Rapid Exit
Extend Twy Echo
Construct Twy Bravo2
Reconstruct Twy Bravo as Rapid Exit
Upgrade App. Lighting System Rwy 30
Provide Full Rwy Strip South Side
Provide Full RESA (West End)
Subtotal
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
7,139,000
25,969,000
5,870,000
1,875,000
1,452,000
286,000
307,000
4,200,000
14,956,000
6,621,000
68,675,000
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
7,139,000
25,969,000
5,870,000
1,875,000
1,452,000
286,000
1,506,000
307,000
4,200,000
14,956,000
6,621,000
70,181,000
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
1,506,000
1,506,000
5-9
Master Plan
Table 5.1
Capital Improvement Program
Recommended Development Plan
Cost in 2006 Dollars (1)
(2 of 2)
Phase I
(2007-2009)
Project
Other Projects
Demolish Existing Cargo Bdg
Demolish Existing Terminal Bdg
Relocate Fuel Farm
Construct Storm Surge Berm
Subtotal
$
$
$
$
$
794,000
2,121,000
2,915,000
Grand Total
70,665,000
Phase II
(2010-2014)
$
$
$
$
$
Phase III
(2015-2025)
12,186,000
427,000
12,613,000
$
$
$
$
$
$ 400,860,000
72,386,000
Total
$
$
$
$
$
794,000
12,186,000
427,000
2,121,000
15,528,000
543,911,000
Notes: (1) Cost of construction and design unless otherwise specified; includes 10% engineering/inspection and 20% construction
contingency.
(2) Design.
(3) Construction.
Source: HNTB analysis.
5-10
5.6.1
Master Plan
Background
5.6.3
30
5-11
Master Plan
Table 5.2
Noise Contour Area (1)
Noise Level
2004
Acres Hectares
2025
Acres Hectares
Percent
Change
Lden 70-75
92
37
105
42
14.1%
Lden 65-70
161
65
182
74
12.6%
Lden 60-65
446
180
436
177
-2.1%
Lden 55-60
1,192
483
1,232
499
3.3%
1,993
807
2,067
837
3.7%
5-12
Master Plan
Recommended Off-Airport
Land Use Compatibility
Lden 55 to Lden 60
For residential areas between the Lden 55
and Lden 60 contours, a full disclosure
statement for residential properties should
be required. (See Table 5.4.) The applicant
should disclose in writing to all prospective
purchasers that the property is within the
BDA Lden 55 noise contour and will be
impacted by aircraft over-flights and aircraft
noise. Such notification should be
accomplished by inclusion of this information in all sales contracts, brochures, and
promotional documents, including any
illustrative site plans on display with any
sales office, as well as within home owner
association documents, and by inclusion on
all sub-division and site plans, and within all
deeds of conveyance.
32
Master Plan
Table 5.3
Land Use Noise Sensitivity Matrix (1)
Noise Level (Lden) (2)
55-65
65-75
75+
Residential
1-2 family
Multi-family
Mobile homes
Dorms, etc.
Institutional
Churches
Schools
Hospitals
Nursing homes
Libraries
Recreational
Sports/play
Arts/instructional
Camping
Commercial
Industrial
Agricultural
= Compatible Land Use
= Non-compatible Land Use
Notes:
(1) From U.S. FAA FAR Part 150 via Land Use Compatibility and
Airports, a Guide for Effective Land Use Planning (FAA).
(2) Source chart used DNL, which is roughly equivalent to Lden.
5-14
Master Plan
Table 5.4
Recommended Land Use Controls for Residential Development (1)
Requirement
Lden
Range
Full
Disclosure
Statement
Acoustical
Treatment
Avigation
Easement
Residential
Land Use Not
Compatible
55-60
60-65
65+
(2)
Notes: (1) Guidance taken from Loudoun County, Virginia Zoning Ordinance.
(2) Residential dwellings shall not be permitted once orginance implemented;
however, for dwelling units approved prior to effective date of ordinance,
full disclosure, acoustical treatment, and granting of easement are required.
Sources: Loudoun County, Viginia Ordinance Establishing an Airport Overlay District;
HNTB analysis.
5-15
Master Plan
Lden 60 to Lden 65
For residential areas between the Lden
60 and Lden 65 contours, full disclosure is
recommended (see above). In addition,
acoustical treatment should be required for
new construction for all residential units to
ensure that interior noise levels within living
spaces do not exceed an average sound level
of 45 db(A) Lden. Compliance with this
standard should be based on a certification
from an acoustical engineer licensed in
Bermuda, submitted at the time of zoning
permit issuance, that the design and
construction methods and materials to be
used in the construction of the dwelling are
such that the foregoing standard would be
met, assuming exterior noise levels between
Lden 60-65.
5-16
Master Plan
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
Chapter Six
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
6.1
INTRODUCTION
6.2
6-1
Projected Benefits
Cost Calculations
Master Plan
Benefit Scenarios
6.2.1
Revenue Enhancement
Assumptions
33
6-2
Master Plan
Table 6.1
Potential Revenue Enhancement Sources
Source
Terminal Retail Concessions
Advertising
Sponsorship Rights
Commercial Land (1)
Users Fees
Departure Tax Retention (2)
Reduced O&M (3)
Basis
More/better locations in new terminal
More/better locations in new terminal
Business center, arrivals hall, etc.
Additional land available near existing terminal
Implement user fees for taxi, courtesy vehicles, etc.
Ten ($10) of the departure tax retained by DAO
New terminal will be more efficient
Marginal Annual
Revenue - 2005
$800,000
$200,000
$25,000
$2,028,000
$425,200
$4,251,950
$535,000
Notes: (1) Market rent estimated at $156,000 per acre, which represents a 12% capitalization rate on a value of $1.3 million per acre.
A total of 13 acres is presumed to be available.
(2) Could be $10 of an increased, $35 departure tax, or a special assessment on visitors instead of residents.
(3) based on assumed decrease of 2.3% after new terminal opening.
Source: HNTB Analysis.
6-3
Master Plan
6.2.2
6.2.3
Projected Benefits
6-4
Master Plan
Table 6.2
Potential Alternative Funding Sources/Revenue Impacts
Source
Funds
Grants
Private Funding
- Cargo Facility
- Executive Jet Facility
25,000,000
$
$
35,054,200
11,017,600
71,071,800
$
$
Note: The cargo and executive jet facilities are enabling projects
for the Terminal.
Source: HNTB Analysis.
6-5
(100,000)
(145,000)
Master Plan
34
6-6
Master Plan
Table 6.3
Revenue Enhancement Cash Flows - Base Forecast (1)
Year
Terminal Retail
Concessions
Advertising
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
2030
2031
2032
2033
$960,800.00
$974,700.00
$988,800.00
$1,004,900.00
$1,021,200.00
$1,037,800.00
$1,054,700.00
$1,071,800.00
$1,091,500.00
$1,111,500.00
$1,131,800.00
$1,152,600.00
$1,173,700.00
$1,195,200.00
$1,217,200.00
$1,239,500.00
$1,262,200.00
$1,285,300.00
$1,308,900.00
$1,332,900.00
$1,357,300.00
$240,200.00
$243,700.00
$247,200.00
$251,200.00
$255,300.00
$259,500.00
$263,700.00
$268,000.00
$272,900.00
$277,900.00
$283,000.00
$288,100.00
$293,400.00
$298,800.00
$304,300.00
$309,900.00
$315,500.00
$321,300.00
$327,200.00
$333,200.00
$339,300.00
Sponsorship
Rights (2)
$25,000.00
$25,000.00
$25,000.00
$25,000.00
$25,000.00
$25,000.00
$25,000.00
$25,000.00
$25,000.00
$25,000.00
$25,000.00
$25,000.00
$25,000.00
$25,000.00
$25,000.00
$25,000.00
$25,000.00
$25,000.00
$25,000.00
$25,000.00
$25,000.00
Commercial Land
Leases (2)
$2,028,000.00
$2,028,000.00
$2,028,000.00
$2,028,000.00
$2,028,000.00
$2,028,000.00
$2,028,000.00
$2,028,000.00
$2,028,000.00
$2,028,000.00
$2,028,000.00
$2,028,000.00
$2,028,000.00
$2,028,000.00
$2,028,000.00
$2,028,000.00
$2,028,000.00
$2,028,000.00
$2,028,000.00
$2,028,000.00
$2,028,000.00
Departure Tax
Retention
User Fees
$510,700.00
$518,100.00
$525,600.00
$534,100.00
$542,800.00
$551,600.00
$560,600.00
$569,700.00
$580,100.00
$590,700.00
$601,600.00
$612,600.00
$623,800.00
$635,300.00
$646,900.00
$658,800.00
$670,900.00
$683,200.00
$695,700.00
$708,400.00
$721,400.00
$5,106,640.00
$5,180,560.00
$5,255,540.00
$5,340,920.00
$5,427,700.00
$5,515,880.00
$5,605,500.00
$5,696,570.00
$5,801,000.00
$5,907,350.00
$6,015,660.00
$6,125,940.00
$6,238,250.00
$6,352,620.00
$6,469,080.00
$6,587,680.00
$6,708,450.00
$6,831,440.00
$6,956,680.00
$7,084,220.00
$7,214,100.00
Reduced O&M
Expenses
$626,800.00
$639,300.00
$652,100.00
$665,100.00
$678,400.00
$692,000.00
$705,800.00
$719,900.00
$734,300.00
$749,000.00
$764,000.00
$779,300.00
$794,900.00
$810,800.00
$827,000.00
$843,500.00
$860,400.00
$877,600.00
$895,200.00
$913,100.00
$931,400.00
Lost Cargo
Revenue
($117,200.00)
($119,500.00)
($121,900.00)
($124,300.00)
($126,800.00)
($129,300.00)
($131,900.00)
($134,500.00)
($137,200.00)
($139,900.00)
($142,700.00)
($145,600.00)
($148,500.00)
($151,500.00)
($154,500.00)
($157,600.00)
($160,800.00)
($164,000.00)
($167,300.00)
($170,600.00)
($174,000.00)
Lost GA
Revenue (3)
($169,900.00)
($173,300.00)
($176,800.00)
($180,300.00)
($183,900.00)
($187,600.00)
($191,400.00)
($195,200.00)
($199,100.00)
($203,100.00)
($207,200.00)
($211,300.00)
($215,500.00)
Total Revenue
Enhancements (3)
$9,380,940.00
$9,489,860.00
$9,600,340.00
$9,724,920.00
$9,851,600.00
$9,980,480.00
$10,111,400.00
$10,244,470.00
$10,225,700.00
$10,376,250.00
$10,529,560.00
$10,685,640.00
$10,844,650.00
$11,006,620.00
$11,171,580.00
$11,339,580.00
$11,510,550.00
$11,684,740.00
$11,862,180.00
$12,042,920.00
$12,227,000.00
$111,934,600
Notes: (1) Growth based on Base enplanement forecasts (with the exception of items (b) and (c), below), in constant 2013 dollars.
(2) Revenue levels presumed to be constant as part of long-term lease or agreement.
(3) Table 6.2.
Source: HNTB Analysis.
6-7
Master Plan
Table 6.4
Visitor's Share of Total Enplanements
Total
Enplanements
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
602,106
529,519
487,195
522,280
520,987
501,624
507,137
506,270
481,642
480,416
465,182
410,334
423,771
404,253
421,317
425,195
Visitor Air
Arrivals
Residents
434,909
386,178
375,231
413,134
416,990
387,625
391,450
380,790
369,971
354,815
332,191
278,153
284,024
256,576
271,617
269,587
167,197
143,341
111,964
109,146
103,997
113,999
115,687
125,480
111,671
125,601
132,991
132,181
139,747
147,677
149,700
155,608
Visitor Air
Arrivals Share
72.23%
72.93%
77.02%
79.10%
80.04%
77.27%
77.19%
75.21%
76.81%
73.86%
71.41%
67.79%
67.02%
63.47%
64.47%
63.40%
Average, 2001-2005
Average, 1990-2000
65.23%
75.71%
70.00%
67.00%
6-8
Master Plan
Table 6.5
Air Visitor Expenditures per Total Visitor Deplanement
High Forecast Scenario
Passenger Arrivals
(1)
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
2030
2031
2032
2033
802,922
837,798
874,188
912,543
952,580
994,375
1,038,002
1,083,544
1,131,610
1,181,808
1,234,233
1,288,983
1,346,162
1,405,877
1,468,242
1,533,372
1,601,393
1,672,430
1,746,619
1,824,098
1,905,015
% Visitors
70.00%
70.00%
70.00%
70.00%
70.00%
70.00%
70.00%
70.00%
70.00%
70.00%
70.00%
70.00%
70.00%
70.00%
70.00%
70.00%
70.00%
70.00%
70.00%
70.00%
70.00%
Average Revenue
Per Air Visitor (3)
$1,356
$1,356
$1,356
$1,356
$1,356
$1,356
$1,356
$1,356
$1,356
$1,356
$1,356
$1,356
$1,356
$1,356
$1,356
$1,356
$1,356
$1,356
$1,356
$1,356
$1,356
$762,243,979
$795,352,658
$829,899,438
$866,310,904
$904,319,907
$943,996,538
$985,413,963
$1,028,648,559
$1,074,279,169
$1,121,933,942
$1,171,702,670
$1,223,679,127
$1,277,961,248
$1,334,651,310
$1,393,856,131
$1,455,687,263
$1,520,261,211
$1,587,699,643
$1,658,129,629
$1,731,683,872
$1,808,500,964
Notes: (1) 2010, 2015,2020, and 2025 from BDA forecast. Other years are interpolated.
(2) Total deplanements multiplied by the visitor percentage.
(3) Taken from Ministry of Tourism and Transport exit survey, presented in constant 2013 dollars (inflated at
2.0% annually from 2005 figures).
Source: HNTB analysis.
6-9
Master Plan
Table 6.6
Air Visitor Expenditures per Total Visitor Deplanement
Base Forecast Scenario
Year
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
2030
2031
2032
2033
Passenger
Arrivals (1)
510,664
518,056
525,554
534,092
542,770
551,588
560,550
569,657
580,100
590,735
601,566
612,594
623,825
635,262
646,908
658,768
670,845
683,144
695,668
708,422
721,410
% Visitors
67.00%
67.00%
67.00%
67.00%
67.00%
67.00%
67.00%
67.00%
67.00%
67.00%
67.00%
67.00%
67.00%
67.00%
67.00%
67.00%
67.00%
67.00%
67.00%
67.00%
67.00%
Notes: (1) 2010, 2015, 2020, and 2025 from BDA forecast. Other years are interpolated.
(2) Total deplanements multiplied by the visitor percentage.
(3) Taken from Ministry of Tourism and Transport exit survey, presented in constant 2013 dollars (inflated at
2.0% annually from 2005 figures).
Source: HNTB analysis.
6-10
Master Plan
6.2.5
Benefit Scenarios
Cost Calculations
35
6-11
Master Plan
Table 6.7
Projected Additional Visitor Expenditures in Constant 2010 Dollars
attributable to High Forecast Scenario
Year
Additional Visitor
Expenditures
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
2030
2031
2032
2033
$762,243,979
$795,352,658
$829,899,438
$866,310,904
$904,319,907
$943,996,538
$985,413,963
$1,028,648,559
$1,074,279,169
$1,121,933,942
$1,171,702,670
$1,223,679,127
$1,277,961,248
$1,334,651,310
$1,393,856,131
$1,455,687,263
$1,520,261,211
$1,587,699,643
$1,658,129,629
$1,731,683,872
$1,808,500,964
$464,015,633
$470,731,740
$477,545,055
$485,303,653
$493,188,303
$501,201,054
$509,343,986
$517,619,216
$527,108,840
$536,772,439
$546,613,204
$556,634,381
$566,839,278
$577,231,264
$587,813,769
$598,590,285
$609,564,369
$620,739,643
$632,119,796
$643,708,584
$655,509,832
$298,228,346
$324,620,918
$352,354,383
$381,007,251
$411,131,604
$442,795,484
$476,069,977
$511,029,343
$547,170,329
$585,161,503
$625,089,466
$667,044,746
$711,121,969
$757,420,046
$806,042,362
$857,096,978
$910,696,842
$966,960,000
$1,026,009,832
$1,087,975,288
$1,152,991,133
Total
$27,577,789,888
$12,930,895,977
$14,646,893,911
Note:
6-12
$1,600,000
Additional Expenditures to be
Realized due to High Forecast
Expenditures (Thousands)
$1,400,000
$1,200,000
$1,000,000
$800,000
$600,000
$400,000
$200,000
$0
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Year
High Forecast
Figure 6-1
Baseline Forecast
2026
2027
2028
2029
2030
Master Plan
Table 6.8
Discounted Marginal Benefits - High Forecast Scenario vs. Low Forecast Scenario
Year
Marginal Annual
Benefits (1)
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
2030
2031
2032
2033
$298,228,346
$324,620,918
$352,354,383
$381,007,251
$411,131,604
$442,795,484
$476,069,977
$511,029,343
$547,170,329
$585,161,503
$625,089,466
$667,044,746
$711,121,969
$757,420,046
$806,042,362
$857,096,978
$910,696,842
$966,960,000
$1,026,009,832
$1,087,975,288
$1,152,991,133
Total
$14,646,893,911
Discounted
Discount Factor Benefits (2)
1.00
0.93
0.87
0.82
0.76
0.71
0.67
0.62
0.58
0.54
0.51
0.48
0.44
0.41
0.39
0.36
0.34
0.32
0.30
0.28
0.26
$298,228,346
$303,384,035
$307,759,964
$311,015,410
$313,650,332
$315,707,060
$317,225,527
$318,243,392
$318,458,113
$318,289,086
$317,763,788
$316,908,154
$315,746,659
$314,302,391
$312,597,125
$310,651,388
$308,484,528
$306,114,773
$303,559,287
$300,834,233
$297,954,819
$6,526,878,412
6-13
Master Plan
Table 6.9
Benefit Cost Scenarios - Terminal Only
Cost Calculations
Project Costs (1)
$0.00
$0.00
$35,054,200.00
$11,017,600.00
$16,316,100.00
$62,387,900.00
$71,071,800.00
$111,934,600.00
$183,006,400.00
($120,618,500.00)
Notes: (1) Table 5.1, inflated to mid-year 2008 (midpoint of construction), except
Terminal Phase II, inflated to mid-2011, and Executive Jet Facility,
inflated to mid-2020.
(2) Table 6.2.
(3) Table 6.3.
Source: HNTB analysis.
6-14
Master Plan
Table 6.10
Benefit Cost Scenarios - Terminal Only
Benefit Scenarios
($120,618,500.00)
$1,958,064,000.00
$1,305,376,000.00
$652,688,000.00
($16.23)
($10.82)
($5.41)
($120,619,000.00)
$1.00
Assumptions:
- The Ministry will be successful in enhancing air service and growing tourism demand.
- This demand will materialize only if the necessary facilities exist to support it.
- A less-than-ideal passenger terminal will leave an impression that causes a percentage
of visitors not to return, and a percentage of new visitors to choose a different destination.
Note: (1) Table 6.9.
Source: HNTB analysis.
6-15
Master Plan
6.3.1
6.3
PROJECT DELIVERY
OPTIONS
6-16
Master Plan
6.3.3
Master Plan
Design-Build
Master Plan
Build-Operate-Transfer (BOT)
6.3.6
Conclusion
6.4
REVENUE ENHANCEMENT
STRATEGIES
6-19
6.4.1
Master Plan
Consulting Activities
6.4.5
High-End FBO
Ground Handling
Third-party
companies
currently
provide much of the ground handling in
Bermuda. These companies do not directly
pay any rent to the Government for the right
to conduct business on the property.
6-20
Master Plan
6.4.7
6-21
Master Plan
APPENDIX A
ESTIMATED FLIGHT SCHEDULES
Figure A-1
2005 Flight Schedule
0
Airline
US
US
CO
US
AA
AC
DL
US
US
DL
CO
BA
AA
U5
AA
US
CO
6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48 54 00
7
6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48 54 00
8
6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48 54 00
9
6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48 54 00
1 0
6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48 54 00
1 1
6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48 54 00
1 2
6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48 54 00
1 3
6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48 54 00
1 4
6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48 54 00
1 5
6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48 54 00
1 6
6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48 54 00
1 7
6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48 54 00
1 8
6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48 54 00
1 9
6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48 54 00
2 0
6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48 54 00
2 1
6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48 54 00
2 2
6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48 54 00
2 3
6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48 54 00
Figure A-2
2015 Flight Schedule
0
Airline
US
US
CO
US
AA
AC
DL
US
US
DL
AA
DL
CO
BA
AA
U5
AA
US
CO
6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48 54 00
6
6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48 54 00
7
6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48 54 00
8
6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48 54 00
9
6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48 54 00
1 0
6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48 54 00
1 1
6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48 54 00
1 2
6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48 54 00
1 3
6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48 54 00
1 4
6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48 54 00
1 5
6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48 54 00
1 6
6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48 54 00
1 7
6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48 54 00
1 8
6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48 54 00
1 9
6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48 54 00
2 0
6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48 54 00
2 1
6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48 54 00
2 2
6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48 54 00
2 3
6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48 54 00
Figure A-3
2025 Flight Schedule
0
Airline
US
US
CO
US
AA
AC
DL
US
US
DL
AA
LH
DL
DL
CO
BA
AA
U5
AA
US
CO
6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48 54 00
6
6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48 54 00
7
6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48 54 00
8
6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48 54 00
9
6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48 54 00
1 0
6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48 54 00
1 1
6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48 54 00
1 2
6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48 54 00
1 3
6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48 54 00
1 4
6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48 54 00
1 5
6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48 54 00
1 6
6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48 54 00
1 7
6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48 54 00
1 8
6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48 54 00
1 9
6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48 54 00
2 0
6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48 54 00
2 1
6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48 54 00
2 2
6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48 54 00
2 3
6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48 54 00
Master Plan
APPENDIX B
ORDER-OF-MAGNITUDE FEASIBILITY
ANALYSIS OF CROSS-WIND RUNWAY
Master Plan
Introduction
36
B-1
Master Plan
B-2
Master Plan
APPENDIX C
INITIAL NEW TERMINAL OPTIONS
IDENTIFIED IN NOVEMBER 2005
MEETING