Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Session objectives
Components
Canons of Taxation
Objectives of taxation in developing economies
Characteristics of a g
good tax system
y
Incidence and Impact of taxation
2
Taxation in India
Kautilya s Arthasastra
Kautilya's
Arthasastra, written sometime in 300 B.C.was
B C was the first
authoritative text on public finance, administration and the fiscal
laws in this country. A major portion of Arthasastra is devoted by
Kautilya to financial matters including financial administration.
C ll ti off land
Collection
l d revenue formed
f
d an important
i
t t source off
revenue to the State. The State not only collected a part of the
agricultural produce which was normally one sixth but also levied
water rates, octroi duties, tolls and customs duties. Taxes were
also
l collected
ll t d on forest
f
t produce
d
as wellll as from
f
mining
i i off metals
t l
etc. Salt tax was an important source of revenue.
Collection of Income-tax was well organised and it constituted a
j part
p
of the revenue of the State. A big
g portion
p
was
major
collected in the form of income-tax from dancers, musicians,
actors and dancing girls, etc. This taxation was not progressive
but proportional to the fluctuating income.
General Sales
Sales-tax
tax was also levied on sales and the sale and the
purchase of buildings was also subject to tax. Even gambling
operations were centralised and tax was collected on these
7
operations.
The history of Indian Taxation starts with the first Income Tax
Law introduced in 1860 consequent on the financial difficulties
arising from the Mutiny of 1857.
The tax was in force for a period of 5 years. It lapsed, but was
revived in the form of a Licence Tax on Trades and
Professions. Later in 1868 a new tax known as "Certificate
Tax", not materially different from the "Licence
Tax
Licence Tax
Tax" was
introduced which later came to include agricultural income as
well.
With the improvement of financial position, 1873 witnessed the
abolition
b l
off Income tax. This
h was not to last
l
for
f long.
l
The
h
Great Famine 1876 to 1878 brought in the revival of Direct
Taxation. This had the character of Licence Tax on trader and
a cess on land. The tax was based on local condition which
stressed the fact that the power to tax should be based on the
ability to bear the burden and was enforced through local Acts.
Reforms included
Fiscal Federalism
15
Similarly,
Si
il l there
th
are Articles
A ti l 269,
269 270,
270 275,
275 282 and
d 293 , allll off
which specify ways and means of sharing resources between
Union and States.
Thus there are both mandatory and enabling provisions in the
Constitution for facilitating a wide-ranging transfer of resources,
arranged
g in a systematic
y
manner,, through
g
1) Levy of duties by the Center but collected and retained by the States.
2) Taxes and duties levied and collected by the Center but assigned in
whole to the states
3) Mandatory sharing of the proceeds of income tax
4) Permissible participation in the proceeds of the Union excise duties
5) Statutory grants in-aid of the revenues of states
6)) Grants for
f any public
bl purpose and
d
7) Grants of loans for any public purpose
16
Canons of taxation
7. Canon
7
C
off Fl
Flexibility:
ibilit Flexibility
Fl ibilit means that
th t there
th
should
h ld be
b
no rigidity in the tax system so that it can be quickly adjusted to
new conditions; and elasticity means that the revenues can be
increased. The presence of flexibility is a condition of
elasticity.
8. Canon of Simplicity:
p
y system
y
of taxation should be simple,
p ,
plain and intelligible to the common understanding. This canon
is essential if corruption or oppression is to be avoided.
9 Canon of Diversity: A single tax or only a few taxes will not
9.
do. There should be a variety of taxes so that all the citizens,
who can afford to contribute to the State revenue, should be
made to do so.
so They should be approached in a variety of
ways. There should be a wise admixture of direct and indirect
taxes. But too great multiplicity will be bad and uneconomical. 23
10. S
10
Social
i l and
dE
Economic
i Obj
Objectives:
ti
I modern
In
d
times,
ti
economists
i t
emphasised that the tax system should be based on the principle that the
effects of taxation should be compatible with the economic and social
objectives and preferences of the community
community. The social and economic
objectives of a standard tax system are:
OBJECTIVES OF TAXATION IN
DEVELOPING ECONOMIES
26
28
(f)
Ensuring economic stability: From the point of view of
ensuring economic stability, it is necessary that the tax system must
be progressive in relation to changes in the national income. This
means that when national income rises, an increasing part of rise in
income should automatically accrue to the tax authorities.
(g) Ensuring that national income is increasing: The tax
system should ensure that the national income is increasing during
boom periods. Similarly, in depression, tax revenues should fall faster
than income so that the p
purchasing
g power
p
of people
p p does not fall as
fast as their pre-tax income. Thus, an overall progressive tax system
is an important factor in ensuring stability.
30
(h) An
A instrument
i t
t off economic
i growth:
th For
F d
developing
l i economies,
i
the
th
tax system has to serve as an instrument of economic growth. Economic
development rather than economic stability is the objective of under-developed
y
must be so shaped
p as to accelerate economic
countries. Their tax system
development. For this purpose, it must mobilise the required resources and
channelise them into investment. It must, in short step up savings and
investment and raise the level of income and employment in the economy.
(i)
S i ll advantageous:
Socially
d
t
Th tax
The
t system
t
should
h ld be
b socially
i ll
advantageous and promote general economic welfare. From this point of view,
taxes on goods of mass consumption should be avoided. The burden of tax on
basic items should not be excessive.
(j)
Optimum allocation of resources: The tax system should be so
framed as to ensure that the productive resources of the economy are optimally
allocated and utilised. For this purpose, it is essential that the tax system
should be economically neutral. In other words, it should interfere as little as
possible with the consumers choices for consumption goods and the producers
choices regarding the use of factors.
31
Tax revenue
Non-tax revenue
Interest receipts,
dividends and fees
from licenses,
passports
p
p
32
Tax revenue
33
Rs. In crore
Year
2001-02
2001
02
2002-03
2003-04
2004-05
2005-06
2006-07
006 0
2007-08
2008-09
2009 10
2009-10
2010-11
Tax
revenues
133532
158544
186982
224798
270264
351182
439547
443319
465103
534094
Non tax
revenues
67774
72789
77801
79894
77738
82909
101542
93734
106959
145189
Total
revenues
201306
231333
263813
304692
348002
434091
541089
537053
572062
679283
% of tax
revenues
to total
revenue
e en e
receipts
66
69
71
74
78
81
81
83
81
79
% of non
tax
revenues
to total
revenue
receipts
34
31
29
26
22
19
19
17
19
21
35
36
2006-07
2007-08
2008-09
2008
09
2009-10
2010-11
144318
192910
213395
255076
301331
80408
111820
106074
124991
120568
240
340
389
511
603
Customs
86327
104118
99879
84477
115000
ED
117612
123611
108613
102000
132000
ST
37597
51301
60941
58000
68000
TOTAL
351182
439547
443319
465103
534094
37
38
Indirect taxes
39
Year
DIRECT
TAXES
INDIRECT
TAXES
%OF
DIRECT
TAXESTO
TOTALTAX TOTALTAX
REVENUES REVENUES
%OF
INDIRECT
TAXESTO
TOTALTAX
REVENUES
2006-07
225045
248467
473512
48
52
2007-08
312220
280926
593146
53
47
2008-09
319892
285405
605297
53
47
2009-10
380582
252512
633094
60
40
2010 11
2010-11
422508
324142
746650
57
43
40
41
42
43
INTEREST
RECEIPTS
NET
CONTRIB
UTIONS
BY PSUs
TOTAL
NON TAX
REVENUE
S
2006-07
21550
37534
82909
2007-08
23804
41711
101542
2008-09
21141
44485
93734
2009-10
19205
55275
106959
2010-11
19254
55747
145189
% of
interest
receipts
in total
non tax
revenue
% of PSU
receipts
in total
non tax
revenues
26
45
23
41
23
47
18
52
13
38
44
45
Direct taxestaxes
1973-74 11 tax slabs, rates from 10 to 85 %, surcharge 15%
1991- simplified tax structure 3 slabs, 1997-98 3 slabs with rate
10-30%
Excise duties
1970s 24 different rates from 2 to 100%
1996-97 MODVAT followed by CENVAT in 2001
Customs
1990-91- complex tariff structure
structure, rates from 0 to 400%
1995-96 peak rate down to 50% , 2003-04 peak rate 25%
Reforms in State tax systems
Shift from cascading type sales tax to VAT
reduction in the Central Sales Tax rate to 2%, from 4%, as part of a
46
complete phase out of the tax
49
Thank you