Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
transparent. Light hitting the zone plate will diffract around the
opaque zones. The zones can be spaced so that the diffracted
light constructively interferes at the desired focus, creating an
image there. [7]
B) Refractors
Refractors are antennas that causes refraction to the
radiowaves. Common refractors include lens and Fresnel zone
plate.
Lens antenna is an antenna whose directivity pattern is a
result of the difference between the phase velocity of
propagation of an electromagnetic wave in air and that in the
lens material. It is used in radar and metering equipment that
operates in the centimeter wavelength range. A lens antenna
consists of a lens proper and of a feed. The shape of the lens
depends on the refractive index n (the ratio of the phase velocity
of propagation of a radio wave in a vacuum to that in the lens).
A decelerating lens antenna, as in optics, is one for which n > 1.
An accelerating lens antenna (without an optical analogy) is one
for which n < 1. The feed is usually a horn antenna that
generates a spherical wave front or an antenna array that
produces a cylindrical wave front. [6]
C) Radiators
In a radio antenna, a passive radiator or parasitic element is a
conductive element, typically a metal rod, which is not
electrically connected to anything else. Multielement antennas
such as the Yagi-Uda antenna typically consist of a "driven
element" which is connected to the radio receiver or transmitter
through a feed line, and parasitic elements, which are not. The
purpose of the parasitic elements is to modify the radiation
pattern of the radio waves emitted by the driven element,
directing them in a beam in one direction, increasing the
antenna's directivity (gain). A parasitic element does this by
acting as a passive resonator, something like a guitar's sound
box, absorbing the radio waves from the nearby driven element
and re-radiating them again with a different phase. The waves
from the different antenna elements interfere, strengthening the
antenna's radiation in the desired direction, and cancelling out
the waves in undesired directions. [8] Common radiators
include, horn, cavity and slot.
A horn antenna or microwave horn is an antenna that consists
of a flaring metal waveguide shaped like a horn to direct radio
waves in a beam. Horns are widely used as antennas at UHF and
microwave frequencies, above 300 MHz. They are used as
feeders (called feed horns) for larger antenna structures such as
parabolic antennas, as standard calibration antennas to measure
the gain of other antennas, and as directive antennas for such
devices as radar guns, automatic door openers, and microwave
radiometers. Their advantages are moderate directivity, low
standing wave ratio (SWR), broad bandwidth, and simple
construction and adjustment.
D) Hybrids
Hybrid antennas are antenna that combine different kind of
antenna to form a new one. It is usually made to improve the
performance of an antenna especially its gain and directivity.
Common hybrid antennas include Hogg Horn, Cas-Horn, and
Dielguide.
A type of antenna that combines a horn with a parabolic
reflector is the Hogg or horn-reflector antenna, invented by
Alfred C. Beck and Harald T. Friis in 1941 and further
developed by David C. Hogg at Bell labs in 1961. It is also
referred to as the "sugar scoop" due to its characteristic shape. It
consists of a horn antenna with a reflector mounted in the mouth
of the horn at a 45 degree angle so the radiated beam is at right
angles to the horn axis. The reflector is a segment of a parabolic
reflector, and the focus of the reflector is at the apex of the horn,
so the device is equivalent to a parabolic antenna fed off-axis.
The advantage of this design over a standard parabolic
antenna is that the horn shields the antenna from radiation
coming from angles outside the main beam axis, so its radiation
pattern has very small sidelobes. Also, the aperture isn't partially
obstructed by the feed and its supports, as with ordinary frontfed parabolic dishes, allowing it to achieve aperture efficiencies
of 70% as opposed to 55-60% for front-fed dishes. The
disadvantage is that it is far larger and heavier for a given
aperture area than a parabolic dish, and must be mounted on a
cumbersome turntable to be fully steerable. [10]